Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Suite 220
20
21
22
23
24
REPORTED BY:
25
26
276
IM-SSCE0001228
1
Deposition of
ESQ.
11
ESQ.
12
ESQ.
13
Committee on Ethics
15
Washington, DC 20510
17
202-224-298
1
18
IMMIN
@ethics . senate. gov
19
IIIIIIIIIIIIIpethics.sena
te.gov
20
alliEl
@ethics . senate . gov
21
IIIIIIIIIIIIIkethics.sena
te.gov
22
K&L Gates
5
1601 K Street, NW
6
Washington, DC 20006-1600
7
202-
8
IIIIIIIIIIIIIkklgates.c
om
9
ESQ.
12
Washington, DC 20004
15
202-
16
@dlapiper.com
17
On behalf of Witness
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 3 0
1
PROCEEDINGS
2
: Thanks for returning. So
3
this is a continuation of the deposition that we had
4
last year. As we told you then, we hoped that we
5
wouldn't have to bring you back, but we knew we'd be
6
getting a lot more documents.
7
THE WITNESS: Sure.
8
Unfortunately we have some
9
that we need to go over with you. Being a
10
continuation of that deposition, all the same rules
11
and laws apply. In particular, this is a sworn
12
deposition. We will swear you in again even though
13
it's a continuation. And so the penalties of
14
perjury apply, obstruction of Congress and making
15
false statements. All of those laws still apply in
16
full force.
17
THE WITNESS: Okay.
18
Whereupon,
19
20
was called as a witness and, having first been duly
21
sworn, was examined and testified as follows:
22
EXAMINATION (Continued)
23
BY
24
Q
Do you understand the rules of perjury,
25
obstruction of Congress and making false statements
26
279
-SSCE0001231
1
apply to this matter?
2
A
I do.
3
Q
Again, as with last time, if you or your
4
counsel wish to come in and review the transcript
5
afterwards, just let us know. It's usually a day or
6
two before it's ready.
7
A
Got it.
8
Q
Okay. And let's just get up to speed with
9
you.
10
A
11
12
A III
13
14
15
16
A
17
Okay. All right. So let's
18
get to the heart of the matter, then, unless you all
19
have any questions before we start.
20
: No.
21
BY
22
Q
Last time we were together, you had
23
discussed some conversations that you had both on
24
the 16th and 17th of June 2009 and also around the
25
time of The New York Times article in October of
26
280
1
2009. You had some conversations with Senator
2
Ensign,
3
A Uh-huh.
4 Q
We asked for the substance of some of
5
those.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
A Okay.
20
Q
But we're going to focus today entirely on
21
those two time periods*.
22
A
Okay.
23
Q
June 16/17, possibly 18 of 2009 and then
24
September/October of 2009, okay?
25
A
Great.
26
281
-SSCE0001233
1
Q
And maybe some related questions about
2
things that have happened since.
3
A
Sure.
4
Q
All right? So why don't we start right
5
off by going back to the public disclosure. Before
6
we start getting into the documents, what I would
7
like to do is ask for your recollection before we
8
review these documents about any conversations that
9
you had with the Senator
on June 16,
10
2009 or soon thereafter, within the following few
11
days. And why don't you start by sharing that with
12
us.
13
A
The day of the announcement, which is the
14
16th, correct -- or no, that was -- 16th was when he
15
told us. 17th is when he actually made the
16
announcement; is that correct?
17
I believe the evening -- the record
18
suggests that the evening of the 15th, that was the
19
late night that the C Street meeting happened.
20
A
Got it, okay.
21
Q
And then on June 16, he had a press
22
conference.
23
: That would have been the
24
evening of the 15th, morning of the 16th, because it
25
was really --
26
282
IM-SSCE0001234
1
version as well?
12
A
13
14
15
16
17
18
A
He said he thought
A Yes.
7
A
I don't know.
10
11
12 Q
Okay.
13
14
A
15 Q
Okay. All right.
16
A Uh-huh.
17 Q
And did you understand
A
As I remember it, yes.
9
A No.
18
19
20
21
22
A
I did not, no.
23
(Exhibit 11121 identified.)
24
BY
25
Q
Okay. I'll show you Exhibit 21. It's a
26
SSCE000I 248
296
A
That's right.
So that could have been 2:00 p.m. Las
one-page document bearing a document ID 43981.
2
(Witness reviewed the document.)
3
I'd also like you to compare the time
4
Yes.
15
to that?
17
I do not remember.
18
Okay.
19
A
6
AVaguely.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
A
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
299
-SSCE0001251
300
1
2
A
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
BY
If you go back to the time stamp on the
12
original Exhibit 19, it looks like that was about
13
3:30 possibly local time?
14
A
Yes, so that was much earlier.
15
16
17
18
19
20
A
21
22
23
24
25
26
-SSCE0001252
1 Q
Let me ask one other question about this
2
Exhibit 21. If you notice, the only person who this
3
is directed to, as opposed to cc, is the Senator
himself; is that correct?
5
A Right.
6
Q
And so do you know if the Senator
responded to this?
8
A
I don't remember.
9
lo
11
12
13
A
No, I don't.
14
: Let's move to Exhibit 22.
15
It's a one-page document, document ID number 43987.
16
(Exhibit 111-22 identified.)
17
(Witness reviewed the document.)
18
THE WITNESS: Yeah.
19
BY
20 Q
This is about 13 minutes after the e-mail
21
in Exhibit 21.
22
23
24
25
26
301
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 5 3
2
A I don't.
3
Q
Okay. Do you recall -7- this is from you
4
to the Senator; is that correct?
5
A Yes.
6
7
8
A Right.
9 Q
10
11
A
12
13 Q
All right. So do you have any reason to
14
believe that it was anything other than taking that
15
line out?
16
A
I don't have any reason to believe that
17
it's --
18
19
20
21
Right, thank' you.
22
23
24
25
A
26
302
1 .1 .1 1 -S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 5 4
1
2
1
appears to be several hours later, after the public
2
announcement. Is that -- is that correct?
3
A
Yeah, it looks like it.
4 Q
Do you recall this e-mail?
5
A No, I don't.
6 Q
You don't recall ever seeing it?
7
A
In the flurry of e-mails, no.
8
9
So
10
this is -- yeah, I don't remember any of this stuff.
11 Q
Okay. In particular, obviously, as you
12
might have guessed, I want you to focus on the
13
second -- third sentence.
14
15
16
A Uh -huh.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 5 6
1
2
3 A
Everybody was digging into i
4
5
A
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 A I think so.
17 Q
All right. And -- but in exhibit
18
Exhibit 20, on the second page --
19
: Which one is 20?
20
: 507216.
21
: These don't have Bates
22
stamps on them.
23
: 20 does.
24
: Oh, does. Mine
25
don't. All right. Which one is --
26
305
..1 1 -S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 5 7
1
BY
5 Q
Is it your understanding that at that
6
point, that was the only background that you all
7
were going to give out?
8
A
To the wire reporter, yes.
9 Q
But that doesn't preclude giving out more
10
background?
11
A
Exactly. I think that we dealt with the
12
wire reporter with this, and then I think it was
13
probably a whole new ballgame after he gave his
14
podium statement, televised statement.
15 Q
Okay. So back to --
16
A
This e-mail?
17 Q
-- this e-mail, what are we on, 23.
18
19
20
21
22
A
I -- I can't draw that conclusion from
23 this.
24
25
26
ME-SSCE0001258
1
2 Q
That's really why I'm going through these
3
e-mails with you.
4 A Sure.
5 Q
To kind of refresh your recollection of
6
just how much of an issue it was at the time, to see
7
if that helps you recall any further conversations
8
about that issue.
9 A Right.
10 Q
It seems to us, particularly from these
11
e-mails, that there was a lot of questions about it.
12
So we would imagine that there were a lot of
13
discussions about it.
14 A Right.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
307
-S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 5 9
A Right, right.
Okay.
A I don't.
Okay.
A
And this looks like it's at about 7:00?
9:00, I think.
A 9:00?
9:55, 10:00.
A
Yeah. I was -- yeah.
to
10
You are actually not on this e-mail.
11
A
Now that I'm remembering the timeline, the
12
night before we had gone over at 11:00 at night and
13
stayed there until 4:00 a.m., so I probably was in
14
bed at 9:00 that night, now that I think about it.
15 Q
Could be. Or 10:00.
16
A Okay. Sorry.
17
(Witness reviewed the document.)
18 Q
We'll note for the record that you're not
19
on this e-mail, but I do want to ask a couple of
20
questions to see if you are aware of it or the
21
inquiry in general.
22
I also note, it appears to be dated July
23
16, 9:52 a.m. However, the e-mail from
24
begins with "on June 17, The New York Times wrote."
25
So, you know, I'm not sure if
26
309
-S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 61
1
had a typo. And it also appears to quote an article
2
that we found to have been published on June 18. I
3
don't want to represent to you --
: It's July, July 16.
5
BY
6 Q
I'm sorry, I'm sorry.
7
When was the article?
8
The article is June 18.
9
The article is the next exhibit, I'll give you that
10
now if you'd like it now.
11
: When was that published?
12
June. June 18. This one I
13
did get --
14
: So the typo is, you're
15
saying --
16
THE WITNESS: The 17th?
17
BY
18 Q
Yeah, that could be the typo. It's a
19
really -- let me give you the article now, Exhibit
20
25A and B. It's a two-page exhibit. It's The
21
New York Times article from June 18.
22
(Exhibits II 25A and II 25B identified.)
23
BY
24
Q
They might have had a version on the 17th,
25
for all I know. Let's see, the quote
referring
26
310
S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 62
1
to is the fourth full paragraph on the second page.
2
Feel free to read it all.
3
(Witness reviewed the document.)
4
Timeline is a little messed up from my
5
date of the error on the
e-mail. Let me
6
start with Exhibit 25. Do you recall that article?
7 A Yes.
8 Q
What do you recall about it?
9 A
I guess reading it. Is there --
10 Q
Did you -- did you or do you know of
11
anybody who talked to The New York Times before the
12
article came out?
13 A
No, I don't know.
14
15
16
A
17
18
19
20
Q
Well, let me focus on that line. It's the
21
fourth full paragraph on the second page. It's the
22 line that
quotes a month later. "A person
23
close to Mr. Ensign's family who spoke only on
24
condition of anonymity said the Senator had
25
confessed the affair to his wife many months ago and
26
311
1 .1 .1 1 -S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 63
1
upon reconciling with her and attending counseling
2
dismissed Ms. Hampton from his political team with a
3
severance that he paid from his own pocket."
4
Do you recall that quote when this article
5 came out?
6
A No.
7 Q
Do you have any -- do you know who that
8 source is?
9
A Not at all.
10 Q
Do you have any reason
any educated
11
guess about who that source is?
12
A
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
A Yeah.
23
24
25
26
312
EMI-SSCE0001264
1 A
I don't know of anyone -- I certainly have
3 Q
Have you ever heard that discussed as a
way to go?
5 A No.
Q
And do you recall whether you or anybody
7
made any inquiries as to who that source was after
this article came out?
9 A
I did not, and I don't remember
10
discussions about who it could have been.
11 Q
Okay.
1 2
1 3
1 4
1 5
16
17 A
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 Q
I'm going to -- I'm going to show you
26
313
1 1 1 .1 1 -S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 65
314
1
again from the -- from last year, on the first day
2
of this deposition, Exhibit
It's 3A, B and C,
3
three pages. I'm going to ask you to focus on 3C,
4
which appears to be --
5
: A, B, C?
6
second is B, third is C.
8
BY
9
7
: That's much later, though.
8
THE WITNESS: Okay. That was much later.
9
10
11
12
13
14
BY
15 Q
Let me go off timeline a little bit and go
16
to Exhibit 24. And again, this was my error to put
17
it in the timeline here, but I think we can just get
18
rid of it.
19
When was it that you came back to the
20 office again?
25 A Exactly.
26
3 1 6
1 =-S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 68
1
I don't remember.
2 Q
Okay. I think you testified late July
3 last year.
4
A Okay.
5 Q
so
let's just deal with 24. Very quickly.
6
Do you recall ever discussing this inquiry of
7
8 A
I don't remember specifically this one,
9 no.
10
11
12 A
I did, but it wasn't a lot.
13
Q Okay.
14
15
16
A
I don't remember specific conversations or
17 inquiries.
18 Q
All right. Let me -- let me get back on
19
the timeline here. We'll go to Exhibit 26.
20
(Exhibit 11126 identified.)
21
: This is a two-page exhibit
22
bearing a document ID number of 507351.
23
: 507351?
24
: Yes.
25
BY
26
-S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 69
3 1 7
A Uh -huh.
1 Q
Now we're back to June 17.
2
(Witness reviewed the document.)
3
Do you recall these e-mails?
4
A
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 Q
Do you recall where these questions were
13 from?
14 A
I don't remember specifically if they were
15
questions that all of us had kind of discussed and I
16
was trying to put them into one spot or if they were
17
reporter questions. I don't remember.
18 Q
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
318
-S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 70
319
1
I don't remember.
2
3
4
5 Q
By the second day --
6
A Yeah.
7 Q
-- they were excluding -- okay.
8
Do you recall whether there was a
9
resolution to the questions that you had?
10
A
I don't remember.
11
12
13
A I don't.
14
15
16
17
A I don't.
18 Q
Okay. Did you -- did you read, I think it
19
was around last -- this past December the article
20
about the FEC opinion -- the FEC dismissing the
21
claim against Senator Ensign?
22
A
I remember hearing about it. I didn't
23
read any articles on it.
24 Q
Did you read the opinion of the FEC?
25
A No.
26
-S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 71
320
1
Q Okay.
2
3
5
6
7
: Fourth full paragraph on
8
the second page, "a person close to Mr. Ensign's
9
family spoke only on condition of an anonymity,"
10
et cetera, et cetera.
11
BY
12
13
14
A
I don't remember that, no.
15 Q
Have you ever discussed with anybody other
16
than your own counsel the FEC opinion or the
17
dismissal of the FEC claim?
18 A No. -
19
: Any questions in this time
20
frame? Okay.
21
BY
22
23
24
25 A Uh-huh, yes.
26
IIIIMIS S C E 0 0 0 1 2 72
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 A Correct.
9 Q
Okay. Before we get to your notes on
10
that, I want to address one specific e-mail chain,
11
and it's going to be Exhibit 27A and B.
12
Before I show it to you, let's see if you
13
have a recollection independent of it.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
A Oh, yes. Yes.
22 Q
And tell us what you recall about that
23 exchange.
24 A
25
26
321
-S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 73
1
2
3
4
5 Q
Just to keep the timeline straight, I
6
think we're talking about two different things.
7
That occurred in late October, actually.
8 A
So then I went to him.
9
(Exhibits III-27A and-27B identified.)
10
BY
11 Q
So why don't you go ahead -- just to help
12
you out, then, I'll give you Exhibit 27. It's a
13
two-page document, 27A and B, and bears the document
14
ID number at the top of 104382.
15
(Witness reviewed the document.)
16
A
Okay. Yeah, I remember this.
17 Q
So you do recall this e-mail?
18 A Yes.
19 Q
Have you seen this e-mail since it was
20
since it happened?
21 A No.
22
23
24
25
26
322
-S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 74
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
A
Well, I mean, II was certainly a part of
the conversation when we were --
Who is
A
A Yes, yes, yes.
A
A
324
S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 76
1
2
3
4
5
6
Q All right.
7
8
9
10 A
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
A No.
21 Q
Are you aware of any other missing e-mails
22
or gaps in any saved e-mails that you heard about in
23
relation to this matter?
24 A I don't recall.
25
26
325
SSCE0001277
1
was searching, in those collections, were you ever
2
made aware of any specific gaps in the time frame of
5 Q
Okay.
6
7
8 A
And I'm sorry, what was the question? Do
9
10 Q
Do you remember --
11 A
12 Q
Did you have a response to how can lawyers
13 not have?
14 A No.
15 Q
And did you discuss that further with
16
anybody else, to your recollection?
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
A Not that I remember.
(Exhibit 11128 identified.)
BY
Q
So first I'm going to give you Exhibit 28.
This is A through V. And it's 22 pages.
326
1 1 1 1 .-S S C E 0 0 0 1 2 78
3
4 Q What we'd l i k e t o do w i t h t h i s i s --
5 you're f r e e t o take as much time as you need t o
6 review them, but what we'd l i k e t o do i s s t a r t by
7 having you read a l l t h i s i n t o the r e c o r d w i t h o u t
8 i n t e r r u p t i o n , j u s t so we have a clean record as t o ,
9 you know, your t r a n s c r i p t i o n of t h i s .
10 A Read a l l the notes?
11 Yeah, read through t h i s so we have a
12 record of -- because we can't read e v e r y t h i n g here
13 obviously.
14 A Sure.
15 Q I t ' s p r e t t y good. We can read a l o t . But
16 l e t ' s j u s t have one clean record. And then w e ' l l go
17 through and ask s p e c i f i c questions about some of
18 them. But t h i s way, w e ' l l make sure t h a t we have a
19 clean record. I f you want t o read i t t o y o u r s e l f
2 0 f i r s t , t h a t ' s f i n e . Whenever you're ready, w e ' l l
21 j u s t ask you t o read i t i n t o the record.
A So you want everything, even s t u f f t h a t
23 doesn't have a n y t h i n g t o do w i t h because
24 obviously, there were other issues --
Q No, our understanding i s t h a t s t u f f t h a t
26
328
1 has n o t h i n g t o do w i t h t h i s has been You
2 might n o t i c e , f o r instance, on t h i s f i r s t page, i t
3 appears t h a t t h e r e i s something covering the top of
4 the
5 A I see.
6 Q I b e l i e v e we've been informed t h a t t h i n g s
7 t h a t are completely u n r e l a t e d t o t h i s matter may
8 have been redacted?
I've to say,
10 were t o l d t h i s was going t o be, l i k e , a two-hour
12 Yeah, I don't t h i n k t h i s
13 should take v e r y long, should i t ?
Okay. I don't know. I t
15 looks l i k e a l o t of --
16 THE WITNESS: Let me s t a r t .
17 Let's see. I don't t h i n k
18 i t should take more than f i v e minutes t o
19 read t h i s i n t o the record.
THE WITNESS:
26
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Q What you don't have t o do r i g h t now i s
e x p l a i n what you meant on any of t h i s . That w e ' l l
j u s t do s e l e c t i v e p a r t s .
A
Q Your best a b i l i t y t o read. I f you can't
read something, j u s t make t h a t record.
A
330
335
t r y and get through t h i s q u i c k l y . We have some
h i g h l i g h t s we want t o get your response t o .
THE WITNESS: Sure.
Q Let's go t o the second page, 43190,
l a b e l e d page 5. The top h a l f under t h a t 169 l a b e l ,
what do you b e l i e v e t h a t t o be from?
(Witness reviewed the document.)
338
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
A Yeah, a t t h a t p o i n t --
Q But a t some p o i n t , t h a t question came up?
A Sure, because t h a t was The New York Times
I mean, they were asking.
Q A l l So w e ' l l come back t o t h a t .
A
Q
A
Q
339
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
A Well, i t r e f e r s t o what i s behind t h a t
blank spot so
Q I t has nothing t o do w i t h t h i s case o r --
A I t does .
Do you guys need a minute?
THE Apparently, yes.
BY
Q Okay. We were on page 9, 43192.
A
Q What can you t e l l us?
Q
A So t h a t ' s what i t r e f e r s t o .
8 A
9 Q What were the responses?
13 (Witness reviewed the document.)
14 Q So the next page are the responses t o
15 those questions?
16 A Are h i s answers, yeah. Yeah.
17 Q So the comments on t h i s page, next page,
18 43193, are the Senator's answers?
19 A Uh-huh, yes.
2 0 Q Next page, marked 11, or 43194.
26
10 Q There i s a redacted s e c t i o n below t h a t , i t
11 appears, because you've got some s c r i b b l i n g a t the
12 end. Do you know i f t h a t had anything t o do w i t h
13 f u r t h e r i n g of t h a t conversation?
14 A I don't.
BY
SSCE0001295
9 Q Why don't we go through t h i s , because i t
10 seems t o me t h a t some of the questions get answered
11 as we go through, and we're marking what we come
12 back t o , and at the end -- l e t ' s work through
13 i t .
14 A Okay.
15
okay?
BY
18 Q Let's go t o what's marked as page 12,
2 5 Q Who s a i d i t was a problem?
26
Q And d i d you discuss whether or not i t was
a problem w i t h anyone?
Q Did the Senator address whether i t was a
problem?
A I don't remember s p e c i f i c conversations on
t h a t lunch a t t h a t time. I j u s t knew t h a t the
p e r c e p t i o n looked bad.
347
348
1 Q Let's go t o page 15, 43198.
6 THE WITNESS: To be honest, I t h i n k t h i s
7 has always been a b i g question mark f o r me, t h i s
8 I
BY
10 And then two l i n e s down i t says
and
12 A Right.
13 Q Do you have any idea what you were
14 t h i n k i n g ?
A I
2 0 Okay. Sorry.
22 That's okay. On the next page, 43199,
24 A No.
2 5 No. Do you know what they are from?
26
349
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Okay.
Q So you don't have any r e c o l l e c t i o n about
any such conversation?
A I
Q Let's go t o the next page. I t ' s 19. At
the bottom,
A
Q
A Let me remember.
353
354
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
24
25
26
Q Did anybody on s t a f f ever l e t ' s get the
d i s t i n c t i o n .
A
Q Was anybody w o r r i e d t h a t t h a t c o u l d be
true?
A Well, sure
Q Did anybody ever express any reason t o
doubt t h a t ?
A
Q And the next page -- next page i n the
second paragraph,
1 A
2
4
5
Yes.
6
7 22,
8
9
10
11
12
13
would mean.
14 Q
Okay.
15
16
17 A
18
19
20
21
22 Q
Well, let's explore that. What's the
23 contradiction?
24 A
25
26
356
EIM-SSCE0001308
1
2
3 Q
4
5
7 Q
8
9
10
12 Q
13
14
15 A Yes.
16 Q
And why was that decision made?
17 A
18
19 Q
20
21
22
23 Q
24
25
26
357
SSCE0001309
358
26
SSCE0001310
1
2 A
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 A
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
24 A
25
1
2
3
about --
A
8
9 A I don't know.
10
11
12
13 A
14
15
16
17 Q Okay.
18
19
20
21
22 A
23
24
25 Q
Right.
26
359
-SSCE0001311
5
6
7
Q
8 A
9
10
11
12 Q
In fact, Ethics had given general guidance
13 on --
14 A You're right.
15 Q Right?
16 A Uh-huh.
17 Q
18
19
20
21
22
23 A
24
25 Q
26
-SSCE0001312
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Yes.
361
A
9
10
11
BY
15
16
17
18 A Right.
19
20
21
22
23 Q
And why wasn't it expressed?
24 A Because we all worked for him.
25 Q
And was there any concern amongst the
26
-SSCE0001313
1 staff about telling the Senator that either he or
3 regard to ethics?
4 A
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14 A
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 A No.
23 BY
24
Q
What facts came out later that made you
15 BY
16
17
18
24 A Yes.
25
26
363
SSCE0001315
1
2
3
364
SSCE0001316
4
5
6
7 A
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
18 A Yes.
19 Q Okay.
20
21
22 A
23
24
25
26
each time you use discussed it?
A Yes.
BY
Q Very close. Next page, 43205, there's no
Q But did he have the same kind of statement
1
2
Q
You don't remember whether he said yes or
3 no.
A Uh -huh.
9 A
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
7 A
8
9 Q
I want to try and finish today, so I've
10
got two more things. I'm going to show you Exhibit
12
thing. I'm going to refer you to two points in
13 this.
15 BY
16
17
18
19
20 A
21 Q
Okay. So I want to go to -- turn on the
22
bottom there to Bates stamp -- this is 29A through
23
H, it's eight pages, the bottom there, Bates stamps
25
Let's quickly turn to 43214. At the top
26
366
MIIIIIII-SSCE0001318
1
2
3
A Yes.
6
7
8
10
A Yes.
11
12
13
Sure.
14
15
16 understand as far as
17 Q
Well, let me ask you this.
18
19
20 A I don't.
21
22
23
24
25 A
26
367
=I-SSCE0001319
1
2
3
4 Q
Let's go to the very last page, 43218. MM.
6
7
8
9
10 A
We had a bunch of calls, so I --
11
12
13
14
Do you recall any conversations in which
15 those were discussed?
16 A I don't.
17 Q Okay.
18
19
20
21
22
23
Do you recall that?
24
A Uh-huh.
25 Q
Was that a planned statement or was that
26
368
-SSCE0001320
1 him off the cuff?
A That was him. off the cuff.
3
4
5
6
8 did.
9
Q
Okay. Do you recall dealing with that
10 statement of his?
11 A
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
8 A
9
10
11
12
13 A No.
14 Q
Okay. Let me just ask this one last
15 question.
16
17
18
20 Q
Yeah, just do you have any knowledge of
24
So unless you have anything
2
transcript of my deposition and that this transcript
3
accurately states the testimony given by me, with
12 , 20
13
14
15
16 X
17
Notary Public
18
19
20
21 My commission expires:
22
23
SSCE0001324
CONTENTS
2
3
WITNESS
EXAMINATION
4
5 by
279
6
7
8
9
10
11
EXHIBITS
12
EXHIBIT NUMBER
IDENTIFIED
13
Exhibits
19A andIIII19B identified
286
14
Exhibits
20A and 1111120B
identified
294
15 Exhibit
21 identified
296
16 Exhibit
22 identified
301
17 Exhibit 23 identified
303
18
Exhibit
24 identified
309
19
Exhibits I1[25A and I1125B identified
310
20
Exhibit 11126 identified
317
21
Exhibits IMU27A and
-27B identified
322
22 Exhibit
28 identified
326
23 Exhibit 29 identified
366
24
373
-SSCE0001325