INTERVIEWS Group Discussions (GDs) Strategies for GDs Interviews Facing the Interview Board' Body Sport for Interviews Negotiations The entire study of communication wouldremain incomplete if there was noanalysis of the systemof group discussions (henceforth, GDs) and interviews. Togauge/judge the mettle of students prior to their entry into any organisation, the communication skills of 'eachone'of them are tested vis-a-vis other equally, academically, competent 101 102 Business Communication candidates. Theones whoqualify at this level are further subjected to rigorous interviews where, under pressure, their responses aremeasured. Thefirst thing which needs tobekept inmind at the time of aGD and interview is that one should be immaculately dressed. It is the first impression of the interactant which to agreat extent influences theinterviewers. Together withthis, theaccessories whichanindividual carries or possesses are alsoimportant. They speak alanguage of their own which could be of great significance in transmitting a positive impression to those monitoring the show. GROUP DISCUSSIONS (GDs) Qualities Looked for in GDs Insimulated situations whichappear tobechargedwith nervous expec- tation, abit of training and coaching inthe initial phases isrequired togear the students toperform creditably. Therearecertain things whicharelooked for during a GD. Primary among them is the leadership quality. Leadership qualities Exhibit 7.1 Group Discussions 1. LeadershipQualities Qualities to be Possessed a. Takinginitiative b.Abilitytogivedirection c. TakingtheGroupalong d. Listening e. Goal Fulfilment a. Presentationof Details. b. Error-FreePresentation. 2. Knowledgeof theSubject Matter 3. Analytical Ability Useof arguments, examples, logic-how effectivelyarethesamerelatedtothesubject matter. a. Distillationof Essentials. b.Abandonmentof Peripherals. a. Thestrengthwithwhichtheargument is posited. h..Flexibleinapproachtotopic. 4. Clarityof thought 5. ConvictionandFlexibility In GDs leadership qualities necessitate that the individual have the capacity totake initiative during the course of theinteraction. This couldentail adopting strategies such as beginning the discussion, picking up the threads at a later stage, etc. Once again it is not necessary to take the initiative if one is not familiar with thetopic. Thequality which comessubsequent toit isthe Taking Initiative Group Discussions and Interviews 103 quality ofpossessing theability togivedirection totheentire discussion. ,. It followsnaturally that theinteractant shouldhave Ability to give the power and ability to sumup all that is being direction h' h . duci t th th said inamanner w lC IScon ucrve 0 egrow of the discussion. Often, it happens that oneis ledastray by emotions or by an inability to comprehend the topic. This is coupled with the feeling that onemust make aperceptible contribution right at thevery beginning of the discussion in 6rder to get noticed. In instances such as these, if an individual is able to give some kirld of direction it becomes easier to followthe flowof the discussion. Theessential attributes of aleader are, therefore, togivedirection . and at thesametimetotake thegroupalong. Such Taking the group anindividual wouldbeviewed' as aleader with the along capacity of chalking out a strategy, filtering and assimilating the ideas while leading and controlling the interactants. The ability to sumup the discussion not only at the end but also in between is a major quality of the interactant. This helps in preventing the group fromstraying away fromthe topic. In the courseof the discussion it isnot important tobethe first ~eaker, but it definit~ly is~mport~nt tomake eve~and regular contributions throughout thediscussion, Thiscanonlybe~chieved when there issomeonewhoiswillingtotake uptherather tedIOUSand -monctonous task of conjoining all the ideas and presenting themin a n~~hell to the participants at regular intervals. All this necessitates that the individual should possess capabilities oflisteningtowhat theother interactants aresaying. Listening Here, onceagain wemust emphasise the difference between hearing and listening. Listening would only beevident w~en the listener shows signs of absorbing, assimilating and then presentm~ the spoken material to the rest of the participants. Onthe contrary, If onlyhearing has taken placeit indicates that thespeaker has not been able to penetrate the screen of indiffer.ence. .. . Theseleadership qualities observedmthegroupindicate that either the goal has been achieved or i~in the process of Goal fulfilment being achieved. In other words, we can say that the topic has been thoroughly discussed by all the participants with appropriate inputs fromthe leader and all of themhave b~ena~le to perform the important feat of bringing int? .focusthe main/ancillary points related to the topic. Trying to conjoin the efforts of all the participants inafruitful manner which w~uldreveal all.of the~ to be part of a cohesive group is no mean achievement. It ISdefinitely a Herculean task which only aleader could perform. 'Ibgether with leadership qualities th~indi~idual. should also be rather well-read about the issues under discussion, HISknowledge of the subject matter should bethorough. Whilemaking apresentation or showing awareness onthe subject matter, two things need to bekept Even contributions 104 Business Communication inmind-the quantitative andthequalitative aspect of thetopic. Where theformer isconcerned, figures andnumbers should not be reeled off merely to prove one's point or knowledge about an issue unless and until oneis absolutely confident ofthesame. If not inthegroup, then definitely among the experts there is bound to besomeone who would beaware of the details. Keeping quiet because of lack of information or knowledge is really not as bad as trying to impress the experts by spouting incorrect information. The quality of presentation would be an appropriate assessment of the topic and the issues discussed. Thenext inthe sequence of trying topresent anacceptable picture of the self is the capacity to use one's analytical ability totheoptimum. Whileit isrelatively simple, to present data on an issue, it is comparatively difficult to conjoin it in amanner sothat it gives the appearance of a well thought of and analysed presentation in the CD; Clarity of thought is extremely important which can be brought about by a distillation of the essentials and abandonment of the peripherals. The movein the discussion could beeither fromthe coreto the periphery or fromthe periphery to the heart of the issue. The participants should not get hookedtotheperipheral issues. Thiscouldleadtounnecessary emphasis on trivial issues. There has to be concentration in the moves which wouldindicate an awareness onthe part of the participants regarding the subject matter and the delineation of the topic. The shift fromthe general tothe specificwill indicate awareness alongall lines and areas pertaining to the topic. For example, if the participants hover round theexampleswithout reachinganyconcretesolutions, misunderstandings regarding the topic are bound to creep in., Finally, whatever isbeing said should bestated with conviction. It often happens that the participants communicate their ideas in agroup without really believing in them. This is more than evident at the facelevel and is easy for the experts to decipher and identify. It normally happens when the interactants harbour under the misconception that to beheard in the group ismoreimportant than positing of concreteideas. Here, they are exposed because they reveal alack of convictionat the time of making a statement. Conviction while speaking goes hand in hand with flexibility in approach and ability toappreciate theviewpoint of the other person. Often a participant makes an error in interpreting the topic which he realises, much to his dismay, somewhere in the middle of the interaction. The need then arises to rectify the mistake and proceed along correct lines. The transition, which must be made, needs to be extremely subtle. Without really Knowledge of subject matter Presentation of detailS, U.e of analytical abilities Clarity of thought Conviction Flexibility Group Discussions and Interviews 105 admitting that amistake has beenmade, thespeaker has toaccept the viewpoint of the other interactant and change sides to be one with those who have amore positive understanding of the topicr Tocitean example, if aglaring blunder has been pointed out by aco-participant youneedtobealert enough torealise that it isamistake. Youcanstart bysaying, "I understand your point ofviewfI'hat's areally goodpoint..." and proceed by substantiating the point of the co-interactant. Youare nowpart of the group and are no longer an alien. But this strategy should beadopted as alast resort. In the first instance, there should benoerrors made. Careful thought shouldbegiventothe topicfloated, before any kind of discourse is begun onthe same. This strategy has been presented as a rescue measure for extreme cases in which an error has been made, albeit unwittingly, and the situation demands a rectification. If unfortunately this bethe case , the interactant would not beat aloss to make suitable amends. Exhibit 7.2 Strategiesfor GDs Do's Don'ts 1. KISS-Keep It Short and Simple 2. Followprinciples of oral communication 3. Make even contributions 4. Conclude periodically 5. Deliberate and slowin delivering your points 6. Adhere to principles of politeness 7. Substantiate your point with examples and not the other way round 1. Speak loudly 2. Adopt anegative stance 3. A casual look 4. Flay hands 5. Talk toofast 6. Provide opportunities toothers to speak STRATEGIES FOR GDs Do's There are anumber of dosand don'ts which should bekept inmind at thetimeofparticipating intheGD.Whilepresenting ideas all essentials of oral communication need to beobserved. TheKISSprinciplewhichstates-Keep It (interaction) Short and Simple is the most important of all the strategies tobeadopted inaGD. Thedescriptive modewhich couldbe used in lieu of brief statements should be avoided at all costs. This couldlead the participants into lengthy monologues merely to provea point. For example: Keep it short and simple 106 Business Communication A: The harmful effects of Mathura refinery on Taj Mahal cannot be underestimated. Even the interior of Taj has started looking pale. While almost the whole of it has been affected from the outside, the interior. .. and soonand soforth till all the participants are led astray. . The delivery should be crisp with only one or two points being presented at aparticular time. This strategy isextremely important as it helps the other interactants inretaining thefocus. If there are more than twoideas discussed at the same time the interactants might get confused. There are evenchances that theparticipant whoistrying to make a mark in the GDwould get lost in the labyrinth of jumbled ideas and issues. In.aGDit isimportant that the contributions madeby thepartici- Make even pants should beevenly spaced. Often it is noticed contributions that theparticipants areinarush tostart speaking. Incaseyouarenot familiar with thetopicyoucan easily shelvetheideaoftryingtobethefirst speaker. What isimportant in a GD is that you should make even contributions if you, as a participant, want to create along-lasting impression in the minds of the people monitoring the discussion. In continuation with the aboveit should b~noted that periodical conclusions are also important. They help in retaining focus of the group. This strategy could also beadopted if the interactant is not familiar with the topic but still needs tobelistened toand tomake amark in the GD. This however, should bethe last resort. Prior toparticipating inaGDyoushouldberather well-versedandupdated onall thecurrent topicsofnational andinternational concern. But Godforbid, if asituation of this sort does arise where you feel that worthwhile contributions fromyour sidearenot forthcomingfromtheverystart ofthediscussion, then youcan adopt astrategy of this kind. This also helps youtoget the group into focus and prevents it fromdigressing fromthe main topic. Here, youshowleadership qualities and givethe impression on onehand, that youareastrongindividual withthecapacityofcontrolling the GD. Every time you speak, try to bedeliberate and slowin delivering your points. If youstart speaking toofast the rest of the interactants wouldkeep probing ideas and issues andwondering astowhat isthetrue import of theconcepts. Anumber of factors comeintoplay when there is asituation of this sort. Doesyour speed of speaking fit inwith the other individual's speed of listening and assimilation? As stated inthe earlier chapter onlistening, there is adifference in the speedof speaking andcomprehension. Rarely doesit happen that there IS aperfect match between, the two. Youbeing anew member in the circle of participants in a GD, would definitely find it difficult to be accepted withyour ideas if youinsist onspeaking toofast. Secondly, it Make periodical conclusions Be deliberate and slow in delivering the points Group Discussions and Interviews 107 is also contingent upon your diction. If youdonot have avery clear diction, onceagain the same problems are goingtoarise. Bythe time therest of the participants becomefamiliar withthetalking strategies and try torespond accordingly, they havealready missed out onavital part of the discourse. Onceyoustart speaking, there wouldbe, at the same time, many interactants whowouldliketohavetheir voiceheard over and above yours. Youhave the floor but it may not be yours for long if, and when, others makesome"uncommunicative" attempts. Youneed tofinish stating your ownpoint but there areothers whowouldnot let youcompleteyour statement. Inthis kind of situation, what youneed to do is to tackle the situation in a firm and decisive manner. All principles of politeness need to be adhered to in the process. Your "Please", "Excuse me, I have a point to make" and "I still have not finished speaking" should bein place. Youshould abide by the basic norms of etiquette. There is bound tobesomeonemonitoring the GD who would beimpressed by these strategies, where despite odds, in whichprobablytheentire.discussion has taken thefaceof afish-market, youhave been abletocontinue. But onceagain what needs tobekept in mind is the fact that you. too need to be heard. "If you cannot beat them, join them" should be the ultimate guiding factor which should help you to determine which strategy needs to be adopted or avoided. At the time Adhere to principles of communication. of the GD the need of the hour is to avoid being magnanimous whereofferingopportunities toother interactants is concerned. Suppose you decide to relinquish thefloor toanother person youmaynot beabletoregain thesame. This normally happens when youask aquestion andwait for aresponse. This begins with the other interact ant answering the question and then taking onthe role of the sender and forcing you to interchange your role. Tocite an example, Provide opportunities to others to speak A: There are anumber of ways through which pollution could be brought under control. What are your views on it? (Looking at B). B: I am certain of it. One of the ways could be... OnceA has committed this mistake it isprobablethat A wouldnot get the floor. The best strategy would beto ask arhetorical question whichwouldnecessitate, at its best, a"yes"or a"no"as aresponse, i.e. statements like, "Isn't pollution goingtolead toerosion and depletion of natural resources, illness ofthemindandthebody?"Thiswouldgive the impression that you as a participant are including all in the interaction and are openenough to accept differing views. Substantiating points with examples isalsoavery goodstrategy to be observed at the time of the GD and should be adhered to in an 108 Business Communication orderly manner. The individual should, at no cost, start by narrating an incident or cite an example and then round it off with a point. While this could be an effective strategy in informal interaction or discourse of any kind in GDs, one needs toobserve adifferent codefor communication. If youget .thefloor and begin with an example, the first thought which crosses the mind of the people monitoring the GD, is that youare merely substantiating the point of another participant by citing an example. In a GD on "Baneful Effects of Pollution", the discourse could take the following turn: Sub.tantlate points A: Nature too seems to be subjected. to pollution. The impact of smog on natural forests is evidenced in the form of withering trees and natural deforestation. This could jolly well harm the balance in nature. B: The Taj Mahal in Agra is a perfect example of the after-effects of pollution. The yellowing effect ... TheexamplecitedbyB at thefirst instance seems tobeacontinuation or substantiation of A's point. Had it been reversed and stated in the following manner it would have definitely had a different and more lasting impact. B: Inanimate objects I relics and monuments of international importance too are not spared from the baneful effects of pollution. The Taj Mahal is a perfect example of a monument which has been subjected to the... Don'ts Inability to make oneself heard above the loud noise in the GD can Speak loudly lead to virtual screaming on the part of the interactant. Not only the tone becoines loud but even the manner of presentation becomes rather overbearing and pushy. This movehas anegative impact onthe rest of the participants as well as on the people monitoring the GD. Try at all costs to avoid this kind of strategy as it could well have some kind of negative repercussions. Coupled with this is the other "don't" which normally comes into Adopt anegative play-avoid taking a negative stance against any ."nce participant, howsoever incompetent or ill-informed hemay appear to be. Hemight betrying to make his voice heard above those of the other participants. Your feelings, positive or negative, towards a particular participant are bound to surface during the course of the interaction. They should be kept in check as they would prove contrary to leadership qualities which you are, expected to possess. Thereisatendency amongsomeparticipants toconveyanimpression Group Discussions and Interviews 109 Exhibit 7.3 Body Sport for Group Discussions Position Significance 1. Pushyour-body tothebackof thechair 2. Keepyour hands onyour lapright atoptheleft 3. Keepyour.Iegsstationedfirmlyon theground; right andleft leg intertwined beneath thechair 4. Handmo'vementsshouldberestricted Indicatesthat youdonot need hands aspropswhen,speaking > ' Keepsyoualert Indicatesthat youarealogical person Keepsyoufirmlypositioned of casualness during participation inaGD. Someobviousmanifestations Negative wouldbeevidenced inthepositioning of hands and g tlcu/atlon legs during the course of an argument: (a) Sitting with onelegfoldedsquare ontopof the other legsothat the ankle comes to rest on the knee of the other leg. This casual posture ismoreor less likenumeric 4and indicates that theindividual wishes toadopt aninformal approach to the discussion. This posture is evidenced in people'with a closed personality who like comfort. Ptnltionlng of legs (b) There is also atendency in some individuals to cross the legs primarily to make themselves more, comfortable in the course of the exchange. However, this' needs tobe'avoided. At nojuncture, 'inaformal discusaion, must the interactant indulge in a posture of this kind. "--- ,; 110 Business Communication Group Discussions and Interviews 111 Inaddition toexercising restraint inthemanner inwhichlegsare positioned, onehas to pay equal attention to the hands. Toomuchflayingof thehands asif onewas in the middle of atheatrical performance can becounter-productive. Excessivehand movements whilespeaking denotesthat hands arebeing used as props to communicate and that, onelacks the ability to use proper words or suitable expressions toget theideaor message across. This does not imply that youshould keep your hands tightly locked and convey a rather stiff impression about yourself to the people monitoring the GD. Few and occasional movements of the hands are recommendedbut onlytotheextent that theyarebeingusedforemphasis or to givegreater weightage tothewords being spoken. Thetendency togesticulate through hands isevidencedinagreater degreewhenwe speak aforeignlanguage. SpeakinginEnglish, whichisanalienlanguage for most of us, leaves us sometimes at aloss for words. Theideal positioning of the hands wouldbeaneat lockonthelap with the right atop the left, Occasional movements are to beallowed if there isanecessity or anurgency toexpress, whichistobefollowed by areturn to the original position. Movement of hands (c)Shaking of one'slegswhen listening tothe other interactants is another gesture commonlywitnessed. Thisonceagaincreates anegative impression of theinteractant. Frustration andinability toget what one wants is normally associated with this gesture. (d) Similarly stretching of legs infront b~the self as if the entire floor belonged to the interactant is againIa rather casual mode of positioning of the self in the discussion. Draping the arm around the head of the chair is once again a rather casual gesture whichneeds tobedoneaway with. It indicates an intimacy of a rather personal kind where proximity connotes familiarity. This posture should beavoided for tworeasons. One, the discussion is not of aninformal nature, and two, proximity with other participants should be minimised. Familiarity as understood in the context of intimacy should not be indicated. It has to be contrasted with aportrayal of acquaintance or formal friendship whichis part of any organisational culture. Youareanindividual inyour ownright andneedtoremain sowith adistinct and different personality. Youmust not make an attempt to 112 Business Communication submerge your personality with that of the other individual. If youso wish toindicate that youare aleader it is all the morenecessary for youtoportray that youare an individual with adistinct personality. INTERVIEWS Pre-Planning Thereissomegoodnewsfor you!Youhavejust beensummoned fOI an. interview whichmeans that youhavebeenshortlisted out of asizeable Exhibit 7.4 The Interview 1. Pre-planning Personal Information Preparing acareer statement Dress Code Detection process Talking in front of the mirror 2. Facing the Interview Familiarity with the self Skills Strengths Weaknesses Logical thinking Honest in giving aresponse Not buckling under pressure S. Negotiations The first serve Keeping the ball in one's court 4. Any questions 11 Questions related topersonal growth in the organisation, if selected. Group Discussions and Interviews 113 number of candidates. .Aninterview call indicates that youhave the potential, else no onewould be wasting their time on you. At this moment if youmake the correct moves there should beno problems whatsoever inyour successfullytackling thesituation andsecuringthe job. Thestress at thetimeoftheinterviewisnotonlyonyourknowledge, academics and achievements but also onyou, your adaptability and suitability for the present job. Prior tothe interview thorough preplanning should becarried out to bolster your confidence and gear you for the anticipated grilling. Spade-work shouldbecarried out on the organisation so that queries related to the institution, i1 raised, canbesatisfactorilyanswered. Thecandidateshouldbeconversant with two important issues regarding the organisation. (a) financial standing of the company (b) current status/position in the market. Together with this youshould also berather well informed about yourself. Your knowledge of the self should well matchtherecordspresentedbeforetheinterviewers. For example, in casethe interviewer is interested i~knowing your marks in a particular subject offered in the high school examination, there should not beany doubt inyour mind as to whether the ones that youblurt out have anything to do with the actual marks onthe cards. Whatever information there couldpossibly beinwriting, whichis presented beforethe interviewers, should also beonyour fingertips. Trytoavoidfumblingor losingcontrol oftheself. After all, if it isaquestion of providingrelevant information about the self, no onebetter than youwould be suited to performthe task to perfection. Onceyour folder isready with all theinformation whichyouneed Pre-planning Personal Information
114 Business Communication
Group Discussions and Interviews 115 or wish togivetothe interviewer, the next step istoprepare acareer statement about yourself. It would deal with questions of the followingnature: Why doyouwant tojoin this organisation? What isit that youhaveinmind, onceyoujointheorganisation? What scopedoes your discipline have in this organisation? Howdoyouplotyour career graphinthis particular organisation? Career statement ability to interact ability to conduct transactions ability to adjust inthe organization knowledgeabout what's goingoninthecorporatesector/economy knowledge about the present company. . Onceyouare familiar with the thrust areas youcangear yourself "MI I " to meet the requirements of the organisation and rror, mrror .. . prepare yourself accordingly. In the initial stages of preparation your greatest helper is the mirror which wouldtell no lies. Learn to practice speaking in front of the mirror. Whenever you feel that themirror isrejectingyouas beingtoomildor tooaggressive try changingyour strategies sothat theymatchwiththedesiredoutput. It couldprobably begin byindicating your current standing inthe academicor professional worldandyour inclinationtowards aparticular stream. Let us take the followingexample. A: I would like tojoin this organisation because it is a fast growing and leading organisation in telecommunications. My area of interest and specialisation is telecommunications. I have attended various seminars and conferences in this discipline. In this area I am sure I would be able to contribute maximum as it fits in with my learning and interest. Youwant tojoin the particular organisation because it is ablue chipcompany.Youvisualisepositivecontributions fromyour sidebecause youhave: got your training in this particular discipline. Your area of specialisation fits inwith the company's requirements and finally the implied assumption pertaining tothecareer graph is, "AsI will beable to deliver the goodsI visualise an upward rise in my career graph." Nowis the time to bother about ..the dress code. Dark coloured trousers tomatch alight colouredcoat or theother wayround. This wouldonlybeapplicable if it was a combination which the individual has decided to don. A smart tie withacoat-pinif youpossess one, preferably blackor brownshoeswith dark colouredsockstomatchyour suit. For theladies, the sari smartly doneupandneat sandals wouldbetheperfectdresscodeforaninterview. Beingabletowalk inasmart andbrisk manner alsohelps incatching the eyeof the interviewer. Your-careerstatement isreadyandsoareyou.But prior tosmartening yourself up, bewell prepared withcertain questions which couldbethrown opento you. Mostofthequestions whicharenowgoingtobeaskedwouldpertain toyour personality, your likesanddislikes, whether theearlier madestatements match thegoalsof the organisation or wouldyoubeaperfect misfit. Thedetection process is about tobegin andthe questions wouldbecentred round thefollowing issues: Dress code Real 'You' FACING THE INTERVIEW BOARD the real you knowledge about yourself consistency in approach ability towithstand stress Oneof the easiest ways of goingabout an interview is tofamiliarise yourself withyour ownassets. Eachindividual has within himcertain enviable characteristics which if polished to the hilt can lead himto unknown heights. It isjust that wearenot aware of our ownpotential. Practice talking about your ownachievements. These achievements have tobe inaccordance with the expectations of theorganisation. Theemphasis may have toundergo aslight change depending uponthe organisation and the interview which youare nowgoingtoface. Familiarity with the self Detection process