Nah.

That was an apology to anyone who didn't get my initial post in reference t
o the topic of the video and isn't a dominionist.
Due to the lack of information about Bronys personal views it is a given that
one would have no grounds to imply Brony is guilty or even not-guilty of imposin
g their religious based assertions onto society.
That said, my statement was a literary device for Brony and anyone else to ref
lect internally on the matter.
Some questions to ask;
Do my actions and beliefs cause an imposition on the others? Should my religion
receive preferential treatment over others? Am I truthfully represented by Chri
stians of politics and media?
Concluding off this, your argument that I owe Brony an apology is non sequitur
. Brony can determine for Brony if Brony is guilty or not guilty of such accusat
ions. At that time Brony will fall into the two types of Christians I highlighte
d in my clarification response. At that point an apology is not necessary as Br
ony is either one or the other.

Your feelings seem to be most hurt here.
What's going on?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IN_TutQ2RPg
Confidence for cockiness is a common switch-a-roo tactic. The same move is emplo
yed through claims of arrogance in place of confidence.
It is best to dismiss legitimized confidence by passing it off as cocky or arrog
ant. It attempts to whitewash the whole discussion for the purpose of retractin
g individuals with similar views who are sitting uncomfortably on the fence over
a well reasoned argument. Whitewashing is very common, but not always easily r
ecognizable.
An example, Mohammed Ali kicked ass. He was vocal about it for objective reasons
. He.... kicked ass! Ali's vocal confidence caused a lot of frustration. Frustr
ations that had many different roots. However, two men discussing their frustrat
ion over Ali may only have common ground up to their frustration then that's it.

Take the hypothetical for example, One gent dislikes Ali because he is black the
other may be black and dislikes Ali because he beat another of his favorite fig
hters who...could be white. Talking about Ali and sharing an expressed frustrat
ion the two will likely only agree up to the point that Ali is a cocky or arroga
nt SOB. The buck stops there.
Inject a third individual, not necessarily a fan of Ali, but one who calls it as
it currently is and things may or may not heat up. The third individual is plac
ed in defense by default. He is left explaining how Ali is not arrogant or cock
y. If he surpasses the offense of the conversation prior to the conversation goi
ng flat He will be
I'm not a fan, but AA is confident. Most Atheist are and for good reason.