Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Share
Share
Share
Share
10/1/2014 Forget He Said, She Said! Four Tricks to Writing Better Dialogue
http://www.writers-village.org/writing-award-blog/forget-he-said-she-said-four-tricks-to-writing-better-dialogue 6/6
How To Sell Your Story: The
Zombie Ice-Cream Wagon Gambit
122 comments 5 days ago
John_Yeoman That's a truly
systematic plan, ManyMoose. I don't
see any flaws in it except
Six Provocative Ways To Become
A 'Real' Writer
135 comments 3 months ago
Maerahn . There are online writers'
forums where you can get fellow
members to beta read
Six Ways To Win More Readers
With Your Words
99 comments 4 months ago
Loretta Livingstone Oh, I did laugh
at your post, and all the related
comments. Yes, UK to
Three Ways (Not) To Kill Your
Story In Its Cradle
135 comments 3 months ago
Mel Goldberg I hate to say this but
the opening is too enigmatic and
introduces too many
ALSO ON WRITERS' VILLAGE
Reply
already know who's speaking--and her voice should identify her anyhow.
1
Reply
John_Yeoman 2 years ago Mod > Don Maker
Excellent points, Don. One approach to dialogue tags is that they
should be used only when unavoidable, to indicate who's speaking.
Otherwise, the 'who' should be obvious from the context or the
speaker's idiom.
As you point out, it's often better to replace tags with body language
or actions.
'"You're wrong!" she hissed' becomes '"You're wrong!" She threw a
bread stick at me and burst into tears.'
Too much of that, however, and we start to sound like Patricia
Cornwell on a bad day...
1
Reply
John_Yeoman 2 years ago Mod
True, Ndaba. The 'fish' version - or an oblique reply to a statement - can be
confusing. However, I suspect that Tiffany does this very well, as does the
crime writer Kathy Reichs. She'll often go further and interlace an exchange
with comments, apparently irrelevant, from a third person. If you read the
passage too fast, yes, it's confusing. But go back and read the sub-text
slowly. The result can be hilarious. What's more, that jumble of voices is
the flavour of real life.
Reply
Ndaba Sibanda 2 years ago
.Thanks, Dr Yeoman, thanks Tiffany. l found your examples very
scintillating and relevant .
Writing dialogue for the sake of having a conversation is not enough. l do
agree that the dialogue should not be commonplace , humour spices it up.
However, what would you say to the argument or observation that,
ANSWERING WITH A FISH VERSION could a good thing for some
readers but a recipe for ambiguities and confusion as far as other readers
are concerned, and hence even something off-putting?
1
WHAT'S THIS?
Subscribe
Share
Share
Share
Share