Application of HIMS System

Raj Mallela
HIMS Ltd, New Zealand

18 Sept 2014
Role of RMS

RMS
Strategic
Planning
Maintenance
Budget
Maintenance
Programming
Treatments
Locations
Project
Preparation
Tender
Documents
Implementation
Funding
Allocations
RMS
Types

Predictive
Modelling
List of Assets
Detailed
Attributes
Utilization
/Capacity
Treatment
Options and
Costs
Risk
Management
Optimized
Decision
Making
Condition
Maintenance
Management
Emergency
Corrective
Preventative
Work Planning
Basic Advanced
Asset Management Systems
HIMS Background
Started as in-house data management
tool in 1999;
Initially used for data analysis and
management in New Zealand;
Transformed into an off the shelf
system in 2001;
Currently it is a complete Asset
Management System.
HIMS Features
Open Ended software;
Flexible and Multiple Referencing Systems (user
defined);
User defined objects;
Dynamic Segmentation and Data Enquiries;
Analysis Module (predictive modelling and
optimisation);
Embedded GIS & Reporting modules;
Interfacing with other Systems HDM4 etc.
Asset Valuation;
Applicable to all Linearly Referenced Assets.
Role of
HIMS

HIMS Versions
Desktop: suitable for fewer users with
limited road network;
Enterprise: suitable for several users
with large road network;
Web version: add-on to Enterprise
version for data loading and data
extraction facilities using web interface;
HIMS Applications (Major)
Project Country Funded by Network Length
Road Asset Management System, 2001-
02
Samoa World Bank Appx 1,000 km
Road Management and Decision
Support System, 2003-05
Kingdom of Cambodia World Bank Appx 12,000 km
Gujarat Road Management System,
2003-06
India World Bank Appx 70,000 km
Road and Management System, 2004-05
and 2012-13
Papua New Guinea World Bank 2,000 Bridges &
12,000 km roads
Road Management System, 2006 Sri Lanka ADB Appx 10,000 km
Urumqi Road Management System,
2007
Peoples Republic of China World Bank Appx 1,200km
(urban)
Wuhan Road Management System, 2008 Peoples Republic of China World Bank Appx 3,000 km
(urban roads)
Road Management System, 2008-09 Republic of Zambia European Union Appx 40,000 km
Central Road Database (RIS and PMS),
2008-09
Republic of Serbia World Bank Appx 20,000 km
Mozambique Road Management
System, 2011 to 2016
Mozambique World Bank Appx 30,000 km
HIMS Case Study - Mozambique
Data for nearly 30,000 km collected
(6,000km paved and 24,000 unpaved);
All classified roads (primary, secondary,
tertiary and vicinal) included;
DC Project completed in Sept 2011;
HIMS Project initiated in Nov 2011.
Implementation Schedule
Development Maintenance & Support
RMS Development
9 Months
AMS and Onsite Support
(Full Time)
1 Year
AMS and Onsite Support
(2 months/year)
3 Years
RMS
Framework
Treatment by
Road Section
RMMS
Routine
Maint.
Periodic
Maint.
Additional Data
Collection and
Detailed Design
Specific Treatment
Per Section
Routine
Maintenance Per
Section
Improvement
Project
Monitoring
Central
Database
(RIS)
PMS
BMS
Bridge
Maintenance
Requirements
Feasibility Study
GIS
Interface
Accidents Traffic
Key Data
Network
Definition
Condition
Surveys
Inventory
Surveys
Traffic Data
Accident Data
Specialised
Road
Surveys
Road
Centreline
Remote
Sensing
Other Spatial
Data
L
i
n
e
a
r

R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

D
a
t
a
S
p
a
t
i
a
l

R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

D
a
t
a
Digital
Photographs
Videos
Key Data
RIS
PMS
RMMS
BIS
TIS
AIS
WebRIS

WebRIS
Sample Outputs Network Stats
Trunk 3,115
Main 3,701
District 12,303
TOTAL 19,119 km
Condition Distribution
Cracking
65% no cracking
Potholes
64% no potholes
Paved Roughness vs Traffic
0.00
3.00
6.00
9.00
12.00
15.00
Summary Statistics Table
A
v
e
r
a
g
e

I
R
I
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
P
e
r
c
e
n
t

w
i
t
h

I
R
I

>

8

o
r

<

4
Average IRI
% Length IRI > 8
% Length IRI < 4
Average IRI 14.81 6.42 5.02 5.66 4.34 2.62
Length in Band 243.28 532.63 576.32 569.27 63.58 104.60
% Length IRI > 8 71% 30% 16% 20% 11% 1%
% Length IRI < 4 8% 43% 63% 59% 60% 88%
<500vpd 500-1000vpd 1000-2000vpd 2000-3000vpd 3000-4000vpd >4000vpd
Strip Maps - Sections
Examples of Maintenance Costs
Agency Costs
Optimal Strategy
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
2
0
0
5
2
0
0
6
2
0
0
7
2
0
0
8
2
0
0
9
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
2
0
1
9
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
1
2
0
2
2
2
0
2
3
2
0
2
4
Analysis Year
R
o
u
g
h
n
e
s
s

(
I
R
I
)
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
S
u
r
f
a
c
e

D
a
m
a
g
e

(
%
)
Roughness (IRI)
Surface Damage (%)
-
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
2
0
0
5
2
0
0
6
2
0
0
7
2
0
0
8
2
0
0
9
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
2
0
1
9
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
1
2
0
2
2
2
0
2
3
2
0
2
4
Analysis Year
A
g
e
n
c
y

E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c

C
o
s
t
s

(
U
S
$
M
)
Reconstruction
Overlay
Resurfacing
Routine
Predicted Condition
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
2
0
0
5
2
0
0
6
2
0
0
7
2
0
0
8
2
0
0
9
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
2
0
1
9
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
1
2
0
2
2
2
0
2
3
2
0
2
4
Analysis Year
R
o
u
g
h
n
e
s
s

(
I
R
I
)
Roughness (IRI) - Unconstrained
Roughness (IRI) - $12M Cap (Yr1-5)
Roughness (IRI) - $6M Cap (Yr1-5)
Threshold for Four Laning
Feasibility of dualizing to 14m wide,
net cost = $1.0 million/km
-2000
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
AADT 000s
N
P
V

$
0
0
0
s
/
k
m
Threshold for Upgrading
Ugrading to DBST in 2014
Cost = 340K /km
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
0 100 200 300 400 500
AADT in 2012
N
P
V

$
0
0
0
s

/
k
m
Three Years Works Programme
Success Stories
Gujarat, India increased maintenance
funds by 15% and established PPU;
Cambodia Established RAMO and
RDCMU;
Zambia Established HMS office;
Mozambique RMS office being
established.
All have followed different models.







Conclusions
Possible to develop an effective RMS if
structured properly;
RMS will help in determining
maintenance needs and budgets;
RMS can answer what if questions;
Continued updating of data mandatory.