Professional Documents
Culture Documents
i;j1
D
ij
_
2
_
_
_
_
1=2
:
This model is applicable in a specic range of shear rates and
generates unphysical values where shear rate is very small so it is
necessary to bound it between an upper and lower limit. In this study
these values are set to minimum and maximum apparent viscosities
measured by the viscometer.
Surface tension creates a pressure jump across the interface and in
equilibrium its gradient must be equal to extra body force inserted in
Nomenclature
Co Courant number, t/(x
cell
/v
uid
)
d Position vector connecting two cell centers
F Face Flux, u
f
x
Weighting factor
f Body force vector
g Gravitational acceleration vector
k Consistency index
n Power-Law index
n Normal Vector
P Pressure
Q Flow rate
R
0
Inlet pipe radius
t Time
u Velocity vector
u Inlet velocity
V Film velocity magnitude
W Film width
x Film length at any time and length along x-coordinate
z Length along z-coordinate
Greek symbols
Indicator function
Weighting factor
Film thickness
Shear rate tensor
Inclination
Apparent viscosity
Contact angle
Density
Surface tension
Stress tensor
Superscripts
Dimensionless variable
- Mean variable
~ Normalized variable
Transpose
Subscripts
air Air
A Acceptor cell
C Central cell
CBC Convection Boundedness Criteria
D Donor cell
DW Downwind cell
F Face value
i Interface
inv Inviscid
pl Power law
s Static
sl Solid-Liquid
t Tangential
w Wall
UQ Ultimate Quickest
x Variable calculated at x
1042 S. Haeri, S.H. Hashemabadi / International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 35 (2008) 10411047
momentum equation. The momentum equation is written for the
whole domain but this force manifests itself only at interface by giving
the transitional area a nite thickness the discontinuous pressure
jump can be calculated [13]:
f
r
r j
ja
jjaj
_ _ _ _
ja : 4
A transport equation for indicator function is also added to the
system of equations which takes the following form:
Aa
At
u ja 0 5
where equals one for points inside non-Newtonian uid and equals
zero for outside points. In order to model the two uid as a continuum
by using Eq. (1) through Eq. (3) the indicator function should be
continuous and differentiable over the hole domain this restriction is
even more stringent for calculation of curvature to calculate f
,
needing to be twice differentiable [13,22]. A possible way is to give the
transitional area between two uids a small nite thickness so 0b
i
b1
is dened in transitional area. Density and dynamic viscosity are
dened as mean values in cells with both uids present (air and non-
Newtonian uid) by utilizing the indicator function as follow:
q aq
pl
1 a q
air
6
A aA
pl
1 a A
air
: 7
3.2. Boundary conditions
A xed velocity with parabolic distribution is implemented on the
inlet as is depicted in Fig. 1b.
Zero gradient is assumed for all ow properties for outlet
boundary condition. All other boundaries are implemented as wall
boundaries meaning no slip condition for velocity and it is enough
to set a zero gradient boundary condition for indicator function [13].
Although this is not the case in experimental setup, low velocity of
liquid and insignicant impact of air around the falling lm
corroborates this assumption. Wall adhesion of non-Newtonian
uid on the inclined plate is considered by addition of contact angle
effects and consequently dening the unit normal to the interface as
follows [13]:
n n
w
cosh n
t
sinh: 8
A value of =90 reduces this formulation to zero gradient and
b90 means that the uid wets the wall.
3.3. Discretisation
The computational domain (Fig. 1b) is discretised by about 500,000
hexahedron and wedge shape nodes. Initial stages of calculation is very
sensitive to mesh and time step size due to splash of liquid against the
plate. So an optimization between process time (time step size) and
memory usage (mesh size) need to be performed. This is overcome by
dividing the computational domain into different zones and meshing
each zone with appropriate resolution to guaranty Courant number less
than one (Cob1) with a minimumtolerable time step size of 0.001 s and
temporal discretisation is implemented implicitly. Although this
method causes numerical diffusion in the direction of ow [23] it is
Fig. 1. a) Simple schematic of experimental setup b) Schematic representation of 3D computational domain (left) and cross section at inlet (right).
Table 1
Rheometry and tensiometry analysis of CMC solutions
Concentration
(%weight)
Consistency
index (Pas
n
)
Power-law
index
Surface tension
(N/m)
Contact angle ()
1.1 5.051 0.462 0.07876 29.9 NA NA
1.5 11.007 0.5294 0.08189 31.5 44.5 58.5
2 28.966 0.5427 0.08532 35.5 NA NA
Glass Surface,
Ceramic surface,
Aluminum surface, NA: Not available.
1043 S. Haeri, S.H. Hashemabadi / International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 35 (2008) 10411047
toleratedover the more computationallyexpensive secondorder Crank
Nicholson method. Convection term in momentum equation is
discretised with a High Resolution (HR) differencing scheme proposed
by Jasak [24] based on Normalized Variable Diagram (NVD) [17]. In this
method face value of velocity magnitude is calculated by:
u
f
u
D
u
D
b0 or u
D
N1
f
x
u
D
1 f
x
u
A
b
m
b u
D
b1
1
u
D
b
m
1 f
x
_ _
u
D
u
D
b
m
1 f
x
u
A
0b u
D
bb
m
_
_
9
where
u
D
1
u
A
u
D
2 ju
D
d
:
A and D subscripts are determined by direction of ow:
if F
f
z0 ZD C&A DW
if F
f
V0 ZD DW&A C:
m
is a prescribed constant, 0b
m
b0.5, with recommended value
of 0.1, f
x
is differencing weighting factor and is set to a constant value
of 0.5 in this study. Diffusive ux terms in momentum equation are
divided to orthogonal and non-orthogonal terms. The non-orthogonal
terms can be calculated by previous time step values and corrected in
an internal loop, however due to computational expense of this
method and because the non-orthogonality of meshes is small and
time step size is also small with respect to other time scales of the
system no correction is executed in solution algorithm.
Indicator function needs to be smoothed in order to calculate the
curvature and consequently f
_
11
where thedimensionless groups Reynolds, Webber andFroude numbers
are respectively:
Re
x
qu
2n
x
n
m
; We
x
qu
2
x
r
sl
; Fr
x
u
2
xgcos/
:
Fig. 4b shows lm thickness calculated from the experimental
correlation (Eq. (11)) and thickness predicted fromthe CFDsimulation.
Good agreement between experimental and simulation data is evident
from this gure. Average error in calculating lm thickness is 15%.
4.3. Falling lm velocity
Fig. 5a shows comparison of experimental results with the area
averaged dimensionless velocity of front versus dimensionless time
for different plates. The velocity has been nondimensionalized by the
Fig. 3. The velocity proles on the center-line of the lm after 15 s a)
:
Q =11 ccpm,
=30, 1.5% CMC, b)Glass, =30, 1.1% CMC, =29.9.
1045 S. Haeri, S.H. Hashemabadi / International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 35 (2008) 10411047
velocity of the corresponding fully developed inviscid uid at the
same length and ow time has also been nondimensionalized in the
same manner:
v
inv
2gxcos/
_
; t
inv
2x
gcos/
:
The dimensionless velocity changes on aluminum surface shows
the biggest error of 15% which can be related to variable contact angle
on this surface that varies between 55 and 65 and is not taken into
account in this study. Fig. 5b shows the same plot for different ow
rates and illustrates very good agreement between the experimental
data and predicted simulation values.
4.4. Film width
In early stages of lmow the width of lm grows as the thickness
of it decreases. Fluid expands on the surface until equilibrium
between surface tension and wall adhesion forces is established.
This phenomenon can be related to shear thinning properties of uid
as described in Section 41 but the uid accumulates in the width of
lm instead to reach the front of lm which results in a decelerating
expanding nature. This continues until accumulation in both direc-
tions comes to equilibriumand a steady speed is reached. Fig. 6 shows
the changes of dimensionless width versus dimensionless time which
are nondimensionalized by length of lm and time for corresponding
inviscid uid to reach the same length respectively. As noted before,
the maximum error occurs in case of owover aluminum plate due to
simplication of variable contact angle to a single constant one. Except
from 50% maximum error in case of aluminum plate other errors do
not exceed a maximum value of 15%.
5. Conclusion
In this study spreading of a non-Newtonian uid that obeys power
law model on inclined plate is studied numerically and experimen-
tally. Film shape, lm width and time dependent velocity prole for
falling lm have been reported experimentally. The image acquisition
and processing techniques has been used for experimental analysis of
falling lmand nally have beenproposed an empirical correlation for
lm thickness as a function of non-dimensional numbers (Reynolds,
Webber and Froude). Three dimensional CFD model has been
developed to simulate the spreading of liquid on inclined plate. In
volume of uid (VOF) frame work for two immiscible uids ow (air
and non-Newtonian uid), the continuity and momentum equations
are solved with appropriate boundary condition. Convection terms in
momentum equation is discretised with a High Resolution (HR)
differencing scheme based on Normalized Variable Diagram (NVD).
The simulation results illustrate good agreement with devised
correlation. With constant contact angle assumption, the CFD
predictions show further deviation with experimental works in
spreading of uid on aluminum plate, but in other cases, glass and
ceramic, the maximum error is 15%. Some stability issues in front of
lm development are also discussed and falling lm velocity and
Fig. 4. a) Variation of lm thickness on glass plate with time (=30, 1.5% CMC, 11 ccpm) b) Comparison of lm thickness from simulation and experimental measurements.
1046 S. Haeri, S.H. Hashemabadi / International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 35 (2008) 10411047
maximum lm width are compared to experimental measurements
and good agreement between results is observed.
References
[1] H.I. Anderson, The momentum integral approach to laminar thin lm ow, Proc.
ASME Symp. on Thin Fluid Films, Cincinatti, OH, FED, vol. 48, 1987, pp. 713.
[2] G. Astarita, G. Marrucci, G. Palumbo, Non-Newtonian gravity ow along inclined
plane surfaces, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 3 (4) (1964) 333339.
[3] N. Therien, B. Coupal, J.L. Corneille, Verication experimentale de l'epaisseur du
lm pour des liquides non-Newtonien s'ecoulant pargravite sur un plan incline,
Can. J. Chem. Eng. 48 (1970) 1720.
[4] N.D. Sylvester, J.S. Tyler, A.H.P. Skelland, Non-Newtonian thin lms: theory and
experiment, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 51 (1973) 418429.
[5] M.M. Rahman, A. Faghri, W.L. Hankey, T.D. Swanson, Computation of the free
surface ow of a thin liquid lm at zero and normal gravity, Numer.Heat Transf.,
Part A Appl. 17 (1) (1990) 5371.
[6] M.M. Rahman, A. Faghri, W.L. Hankey, Fluid ow and heat transfer in a radially
spreading thin liquid lm, Numer. Heat Transf., Part A Appl. 21 (1) (1992) 7190.
[7] F.H. Harlow, J.E. Welch, Numerical calculation of time dependent viscous
incompressible uid ow with free surface, Phys. Fluids 8 (12) (1965) 21822189.
[8] C.W. Hirt, B.D. Nichols, Volume of uid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free
boundaries, J. Comput. Phys. 39 (1981) 201225.
[9] S. Osher, J.A. Sethian, Fronts propagating with curvature-dependant speed:
algorithms based on HamiltonJacobi formulations, J. Comput. Phys. 79 (1988)
1249.
[10] J.A. Sethian, P. Smereka, Level set methods for uid interfaces, Annu. Rev. Fluid
Mech. 35 (2003) 341372.
[11] M. Sussman, E.G. Puckett, A coupled level set and volume-of-uid method for
computing 3Dand axisymmetric incompressible two-phase ows, J. Comput. Phys.
162 (2000) 301337.
[12] I.D. Sutalo, A. Bui, M. Rudman, The ow of non-Newtonian uids down inclines,
J. non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 136 (2006) 6475.
[13] J.U. Brackbill, D.B. Kothe, C. Zemach, A continuum method for modeling surface
tension, J. Comput. Phys. 100 (1992) 335354.
[14] A. Miyara, Numerical simulation of wavy liquid lm owing down on a vertical
wall and an inclined wall, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 39 (2000) 10151027.
[15] H.S. Dou, N. Phan-Thien, B.C. Khoo, K.S. Yeo, R. Zheng, Simulation of front evolving
liquid lm owing down an inclined plate using level set method, Comput. Mech.
34 (2004) 271281.
[16] K. Ghosh, A. Mukhopadhyay, S. Sen, D. Sanyal, A sphericosymmetric VOF approach
for investigating immiscible two-phase systems with one liquid phase, Numer.
Heat Transf., Part A Appl. 50 (10) (2006) 949974.
[17] B.P. Leonard, The ULTIMATE conservative difference scheme applied to unsteady
one-dimensional advection, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 88 (1991) 1774.
[18] O. Ubbink, R.I. Issa, A method for capturing sharp uid interfaces on arbitrary
meshes, J. Comput. Phys. 153 (1999) 2650.
[19] T. Yamamoto, R. Kimoto, N. Mori, Tip velocity of viscous ngers in shear thinning
ows in a Hele-Shaw cell, JSME 48 (2005) 756762.
[20] F. Yasar, H. Togrul, N. Arslan, Flow properties from cellulose and carboxymethyl
cellulose from orange peel, J. Food Eng. 81 (2007) 187199.
[21] R.B. Bird, R.C. Armstrong, O. Hassager, Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids Vol. 1: Fluid
Mechanics, John Wiley, New York, 1978.
[22] B. Lafaurie, C. Nardone, R. Scardovelli, S. Zaleski, G. Zanetti, Modeling merging and
fragmentation in multiphase ows with SURFER, J. Comput. Phys. 113 (1994)
134147.
[23] C.A.J. Fletcher, Computational techniques for uid dynamics, Volume 2, Specic
techniques for different ow categories, 2nd Ed, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.
[24] H. Jasak, H.C. Weller, R.I. Issa, A.D. Gosman, High resolution NVD differencing
scheme for arbitrarily unstructured meshes, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 31
(1999) 431449.
[25] B.P. Leonard, A stable and accurate convective modeling procedure based on
quadratic upstream interpolation, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 19 (1979)
5998.
[26] H. Weller, G. Tabor, H. Jasak, C. Fureby, A tensorial approach to computational
continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques, Comput. Phys. 12 (6)
(1998) 620631.
[27] S. Haeri, Numerical analysis of two phase ow for interface shape prediction, MSc.
Thesis, Iran University of Science and Technology (2007).
[28] S. Haeri, S.H. Hashemabadi, Experimental study of non-Newtonian falling lm
dynamics, 5th International Chemical Engineering Congress (IChEC 2008), Kish
Island, Iran.
Fig. 6. Comparison of lm width for different experimental and simulation runs.
Fig. 5. Comparison of experimental and numerical time dependent dimensionless
velocity a) Different surfaces, =30, 1.5% CMC, 11ccpm b) Different ow rates, =30,
1.1% CMC, =29.9.
1047 S. Haeri, S.H. Hashemabadi / International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 35 (2008) 10411047