Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3
( )
( )
[ ]
.) 21 ( 642
7 . 53
1
270 , 58 771 , 92
7 . 53
1
148 281 . 3 120
60 cos 83 . 0
1 . 1 35000
) (
1
cos
jts ft
m
hwdp W
Wdc Ldc
Kb
Df Wob
=
=
HWDP required.
Based on a drill collar and BHA component length of 120m, the following calculation determines the
amount of HWDP required for 35,000WOB (Upper limit of 12 PDC), at an angle of 60degrees (i.e.
where cos. = 0.5). Note: A t higher angles BHA has a diminishing effect for WOB requirements.
If buckling was the limiting factor appendix 4 illustrates that at 60degrees, drill-pipe could also be used
to apply WOB up to 53,000lbs before buckling would occur. (available weight from BHA components is
only 31,000lbs at 60degrees inclination.)
Init ial t ubular select ion
Size Grade Lbs/ft
*
Yield
strength
(psi)
Burst
(psi)
Collapse
(psi)
Body strength
(Klbs)
5 S 22.5 135,000 15,640 10,050 560,764
5 G 21.8 105.000 12,090 8,765 436,150
5HWDP -- 53.7 -- -- -- 691,185
HWDP dimensions: 5 OD x 3 ID
*Adjusted weights.
Burst, collapse and body strengths given for premium pipe.
4
Drillst ring design
ABC oil companies require that drill strings have at least a quality of API inspection " Premium " grade
for the drill string and depth of well required and that drill string are inspected to a minimum DS1 class 4
standard.
Note : For a specification of the various API inspection classifications see API standard 7 : Rotary
Drilling Equipment or the recently released DS-1 Drill stem Design and Inspection specification.
Normal operating conditions
During normal drilling operations, the drillstring is subjected to constantly changing individual and
combined tension, torsion, bending, and pressure loads. During any drillstring design it is important to
note in the design and operating stag. In reality worst case individual and combined conditions and
make compensation for any assumptions used or as the case may be for conditions that may change
or not be accounted and/or applied for.
It is generally accepted that the most damaging combined loads occur under the following conditions:
During extreme drilling operations; Directional , horizontal ,
extended reach.
Rotating the drillstring under tension and/or torsion e.g. back
reaming with a top drive,
Stuck pipe e.g. jarring, overpull, combined tension, compression
and/or torsion.
Fishing operations e.g. jarring, overpull, combined tension,
compression and/or torsion.
Main design considerations.
The main design considerations on the drillstring to be accounted for are :
Tensional pulling and pushing ( compression ) on the drillstring,
Combined tension / torsion while twisting the drillstring during rotation.
The torsion while making up or braking out the drillstring components,
The bending derived from wellbore geometry, doglegs in the wellbore, or through
misalignment of the crown block,
Pressures created by surface and subsurface pressure, or different drilling fluids
inside and outside the drillstring.
Slip crushing and stability forces.
Shock loading on applying tension, compression or combined loads to the
drillstring components.
5
Notes :
1.) Von Mises triaxial equation, fatigue and jar placement considerations are not considered in design
2.) Due to the complexities involved vibrational analysis is not considered and accounted for in this
brief.
3.) Corrosion and erosion are not loads, but they both reduce the strength of tubulars. Accounting for a
measure of wall thickness (e.g. 80%) to account for anticipated erosion and corrosion is considered
acceptable in this case. e.g. A long extended reach well where drillpipe wear may be severe.
The fundamental approach to drill string design is to calculate the loads individually to determine if the
strength of the drill string is exceeded by each individual load. Then combine all loads in the Von Mises
general stress and fatigue endurance equations to ascertain if general or fatigue failure will occur. (see
appendix2)
Tension Design Factors.
The first considerations to be made regarding designing a drillstring for tension applied is to select a
maximum working load that would never be exceeded during normal drilling operations.
In the case of drillpipe this working load is based on a stress of 85% of the yield strength of the pipe, as
recommended in strength and dimensions tables provided.
The second consideration in tension string design is to determine the maximumallowable static load.
This is the hook load when the drillstring ( including the drill collars, BHA components, etc. ) are hanging
free in the wellbore and are equal to the string weight in air multiplied by the buoyancy factor for the
weight of the drilling fluid in use.
Three general methods are used to determine the Maximumallowable static load, they are
Design factor.
Margin of overpull.
Safety factor for slip crushing.
6
TWFH-13 drillstring design requirements :
1.) calculate the lengths of various 5" 19.50 lbs/ft G105 and S135 drillstrings for drilling the hole.
2.) Using maximum lengths of all drillstrings , what is the maximum depth obtainable.
3.) Design the strings to account for slip crushing, safety factor for accelerating loads.
Margin of over pull allowed = 120,000 lbs.
Depth of along hole depths required = 12 section 9843ft (3000m.), 8 section 14,108ft
(4300m)
Use maximum lengths for G and S.
Drill collars = 8" x 2.813" x 120m, 200m HWDP, 5 x 3
6 x 2.813 x 120m in 8 @ hole.
Mud in use = 10.8ppg.
From API section B3 page 3
= 5" 19.50 lbs/ft G = 553,833 lbs, minimum yield strength., S = 712,070 lbs
a.) "G" pipe Maximum allowable static load ( for acceleration forces )
= Min Ys x 0.85 = 553,833 x 0.85 "G"= 353,953 lbs.
S.F 1.33
Similarly "S" = 455,082 lbs
b.) Margin of overpull, maximum allowable static load.
"G" = (min Ys x 0.85)/1.33 - M.O.P = (553,833 x 0.85)/1.33 - 120,000
"G"= 233,953 lbs
Similarly "S" = 335,082lbs.
c ) Slip crushing. ( Assume normally lubricated slips, coefficient of friction = 0.08 )
from table provided :
16 slips, friction factor = 0.08
K = 4.00 ( for 5" drillpipe. )
Safety factor Sh/St = 1.42.
Maximum allowable static load = Min Ys x 0.85
1.42
"G"= 553,833 x 0.85 = 331,520 lbs.
1.42
Similarly "S" = 331,518 lbs.
7
For "G" pipe the max. allowable static load = 203,953 lbs.
( From the M.O.P. calculations, i.e.lowest loadings)
Maximum allowable depth of "G" pipe. =
Max allowable static load - ( Wdc x Ldc) + (Whwdp x Lhwdp)
Wdp * Kb Wdp Wdp
BHA = (2.67 ( 8 - 2.813 ) x 120m + ( 2.67( 5 - 3 ) x 200m) x 3.281 x 0.83 = 86,992lbs
Buoyancy factor ( Kb ) = 0.83
= 233,953 - 86,992 = 8939ft
21.80 x 0.83 21.80
Maximum length "G" and "S"
= max all static load "S" - ( Wbha x Lbha ) + ( Wdp1 x Ldp1)
Wdp2 x Kb Wdp2
= 335,082 - ( 86,992 ) + ( 21.80 x 9839ft)
22.50 x 0.83 22.50
= 4544ft.
Maximum depth G and S
= 8939ft + 4544ft = 13,483ft
12 section 3000m (9843ft) & 8 section TD 4300m (14,108ft) a combination of G and S would
be required. Maximum depth we can drill to with G & S pipe.
=13,483t + 120m (drill collars) + 200m HWDP = 14,532ft (TD of well is 4300m (14,108ft.)
For additional safety 6000ft of G will be run with the remainder S. Summary sheets and
spreadsheet calculations have been based on these figures.
A design spreadsheet was run (courtesy of Mitchell engineering) to ensure all design criteria are
met. ( See Appendix 2.)
8
St iffness rat ios
Drill collars to HWDP ( section modulus figures taken from DS-1.)
Drill collars 8 x 2 13/16, HWDP 5 x 3
SR = Z below / Z above
= 54.382 / 10.682 = 5.09
Drill collars 6 x 2 13/16, HWDP 5 x 3
SR = Z below / Z above
= 20.181 / 10.682 = 1.89
HWDP to G drillpipe ( section modulus figures taken from DS-1.)
HWDP 5 x 3, G pipe 5 x 4.276
SR = Z below / Z above
= 10.682 / 5.708 = 1.87
Stiffness ratios are within acceptable ranges
Torsional check (* values from DS-1)
Connection O.D. (in) I.D. (in) *Make up
torque (ftlbs)
*Torsional
strength (ftlbs)
Max operating
torque (ftlbs)
G NC-50 6 5/8 3 27,080 45,130 25,000
S NC-50 6 5/8 3 31,020 51,700 25,000
Torsional checks are within max operating torque allowable.
9
Drillst ring summary for 12 sect ion.
Cum length Air wt (lbs) Buoyed wt
(lbs)
Cum buoyed
wt (lbs)
Overpull
(pa-Cum Bw)
Drill collars 8 x 2 13/16
6 5/8 reg
120m 120m 59K 49K 49K -
HWDP
5 x 3
NC-50
200m 320m 35K 29K 78K -
Drill pipe 1 19.50 G
NC-50
6000ft
(1828m)
2148m 131K 109K 187K 166K
Drill pipe 2
19.50 S
NC-50
2795ft
(852m)
3000m 61K 51K 238K 217K
Pa = maximum allowable load for drillpipe from design calculation
Drillst ring summary for 8 sect ion.
Cum length Air wt (lbs) Buoyed wt
(lbs)
Cum buoyed
wt (lbs)
Overpull
(pa-Cum Bw)
Drill collars
6 x 2 13/16
4 IF
120m 120m 30K 25K 25K -
HWDP 5 x 3
NC-50
200m 320m 35K 29K 54K -
Drill pipe 1
19.50 G
NC-50
6000ft
(1828m)
2148m 131K 109K 163K 190K
Drill pipe 2 19.50 S
NC-50
7060ft
(2152m)
4300m 159K 132K 295K 160K
Pa = maximum allowable static load
Note: In reality as inclinations increase, less BHA components are required and more drillpipe can be
used for WOB before buckling will occur. (see appendix 4)
To permit drillstring to slide, HWDP may have to be placed in the build section, drags and buckling
would have to be determined using a torque and drag simulator.
KI NGDOM DRI LLI NG SERVI CES LTD.
Derri ck l oadi ng
Derrick loading worst case
1.) Worst case would be running heaviest casing string (95/8 casing 463K), getting stuck
at section TD and applying maximum overpull i.e. 150,000lbs.
2.) Assuming all 5 drillpipe has been picked up to drill to TD
Block weight + top drive and hoisting equipment = 80,000lbs.
No account taken for other equipment and fixtures in derrick. E.g. Pipe handling
system.
Pipe in derrick
5 drillpipe required for well 1828m x 21.8 lbs/ft x 3.281 130,749lbs
2152m x 22.50 x 3.281 158,866lbs
120m BHA (Dcs + BHA) 120m x 99lbs/ft x 3.281 58,270lbs
21 joints of HWDP 200m x 53.7lbs/ft x 3.281 35,238lbs
1.) Pipe weight in derrick 383,123lbs set back load.
Casing stuck 3000m x 47lbs/ft x 3.281 463,000lbs
Over pull applied Design for 150,000lbs 150,000lbs
Block and travelling eqpt. weight 80,000lbs 80,000lvs
2.) Stuck casing load on derrick 693,000lbs.
1.) + 2.) Worst case derrick loading 1,0761,123lbs
Dynamic derrick loading for worst case
Dynamic derrick load (12 lines run blocks)
Hook line load (Hl) = Casing wt +overpull + blocks etc 693,000lbs
Fast line load (Fl) = Hl / (No of lines (n) x eff factor)
693,000 / ( 12 x 0.77)
75,000lbs
Deadline load (Dl) = Hl / No of lines (n)
693,000 / 12
57,750lbs
3.) Dynamic derrick load = Hl + Dl + Fl = 825,750lbs
4.) Derrick load static = ((n) + 2 / (n) ) * Hl 808,500lbs
KI NGDOM DRI LLI NG SERVI CES LTD.
Blockline select ion
1 3/8 Extra improved plough steel block line has a breaking strength of 192,000lbs.
Safety factor on maximum fast line load (75,000lbs) from previous page.
Sf = (192,000lbs / 75,000lbs)
Safety factor = 2.56
This is an acceptable factor for drilling and/or casing operations.
KI NGDOM DRI LLI NG SERVI CES LTD.
Draworks requi rement s
The operator would like to trip with a minimum speed of 90ft/min at the highest loading
conditions.
Fast line speed = (n) x speed required ft/min
= 12 lines x 90ft/min = 1080 ft/min.
For a 60 drum ( 1.25ft radius = (r) )
Velocity of the fast line (Vf) = 2 x x r x N
1080 = 2 x 3.14 x 1.25 x N
N = 138 revs /min.
Horse power of the drum (HP) = ( Fl x 2 x x r x N ) / (33,0000)
Where 33,000 = ftlbs / rev/min / per HP.
HP = (75,000lbs x 2 x 3.14 x 1.25ft x 138revs/min) / (33,000)
Horse power of drum = 2462 HP.
HP of draw works (assuming mechanical efficiency of 85%) = 2462 / 0.85
Horse power of draworks = 2896 Hp.
A 3000hp draw works would therefore be most suited for the Daisy platform.
KI NGDOM DRI LLI NG SERVI CES LTD.
Mud pump out put and pressure rat i ngs
Hydraulics calculations for the two critical hole cleaning sections i.e. the 17 and 12
sections is provided in appendix 3.
Based on a maximum section depth operating pressure of 4350psi and 950GPM in the
12 section.
The horsepower required for the mud pumps, assuming a 95% volumetric and 0.85%
efficiency factors =
HHP = (P x V) / (1714 x 0.85 x0.95)
= (4350psi x 950GPM) / (1714 x 0.85 x0.95)
= 2986HHP.
2 x 1600Hp pumps would be required e.g. National 12-P-160
Three pumps would be preferred to provide operational redundancy if one pump requires
repair.
KI NGDOM DRI LLI NG SERVI CES LTD.
Mud pi t capaci t y
Mud pit capacit y
Largest volumes required are in the 17 section and would be displacing hole to
mud at section TD.
17 hole volume = (900 x 0.3415bbls/ft) + (0.2975bbls/ft x 750m) x 3.281 = 1740
bbls
based on a rule of thumb that reserve = active requirements.
A pit volume capacity in excess of 3000bbls would be required.
Sol i ds removal equi pment .
Requirement s.
Shale shakers to handle circulation volumes 1100-1200GPM in 17 hole section.
With redundancy for one shakers to be taken out of service using as fine as screens
as possible to maintain high solids removal efficiency. E.g. High capacity , fine screen
shale shakers. ( Thule VSM 100s)
Built in scalping screen, quick change screen facility, easy to operate and maintain,
repairable screens.
Efficient centrifuges to remove fine solids generated during drilling.
As WBM being used shakers designed not to be underloaded so as to effect
maximum operating performance.
Shallow header tanks entry to shakers and proper flowline division to ensure flow can
be equally controlled and divided to each shakers as required.
Poor boy de-gasser to be fitted with minimum 8 vent line.
Vacuum de-gasser to be able to handle max. operating rate of charge pumps i.e.
1200GPM.
Gumbo box fitted to flowline.
Flowline access platform for fitting and maintaining flowshows, gas detectors etc.
2 weco flushing connections fitted at strategic points for flowline cleaning
2
Mud mi xi ng & t reat ment equi pment .
Large diameter piping, with as direct feed and discharge as possible with minimum
bends to reduce pressure losses ( 6 or 8 pipe.) with minimum fluid velocity of
10ft/sec.
Centrifugal mix pumps 6 x 8. Desirable to mix and treat mud in large quantities in
the shortest possible time.
Hoppers : 6 x 8 Centrifugal, 1400-1600GPM, @ 50 70psi.
Shearing device for mixing polymers, (ABC Oil policy to use WBM exclusively for
wells.)
KI NGDOM DRI LLI NG SERVI CES LTD.
Appendi x 3