Professional Documents
Culture Documents
?
"
K
,
where
?
and
K
are the wall shear stresses in vivo and
measured in the model, respectively, and
?
and
?
,
K
and
K
are the density and kinematic viscosity of
blood and the model #uid, respectively. If we assume that
a patient's blood has a viscosity of 3.7;10\ Pa s and
density of 1050 kg/m, the expression in brackets, which
represents the scaling factor for shear stress, is equivalent
to 0.337. Applying the above correction to the experi-
mental data obtained along the arterial #oor (Fig. 7), for
example, gives maximum time-averaged wall shear stress
of 9.2 N/m in vivo. Likewise, the Reynolds stress values
quoted above decrease to levels below that which are
known to cause haemolysis. The wall shear stress values
for the vein given in Table 1, which should also be scaled
accordingly, reveal a region of low (0.34 N/m) and high
(13.5 N/m) mean wall shear stress at 10 mm on the inner
wall and 4 mm on the outer wall.
A previous clinical study (Sivanesan et al., 1999) identi-
"ed three speci"c sites of stenosis in patients with pri-
mary access radiocephalic "stulae: at the anastomosis on
the #oor of the artery, on the inner wall of the curved
region of the vein and just proximal to this curved seg-
ment where the vein straightens out. The present study
revealed high wall shear stress on the #oor of the artery
and on the outer wall of the vein, near the anastomosis.
High turbulence intensity was also observed in the "stula
especially near the anastomosis which may be associated
with anastomotic stenosis. Although turbulence intensity
remained relatively high throughout the vein, the regions
of abnormally low or high wall shear stress were found
within 10 mm of the suture line. Thus wall shear stress
may not be a contributory factor in the development of
localised stenoses within the cephalic vein. This study
indicates that the #ow patterns change rapidly in the
segment of the vein near the anastomosis and thus much
more detailed measurements are needed before any con-
clusive observations can be drawn. Further studies of the
e!ects of diameter ratio and anastomosis angle are also
required in order to determine whether it is possible, by
modifying the geometry of the "stula, to reduce the
magnitude of wall shear stress on the artery #oor and
turbulence intensity in the vein and thereby improve
long-term "stula patency.
S. Sivanesan et al. / Journal of Biomechanics 32 (1999) 915}925 923
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mr. Malcolm W.
Brown, Consultant Renal Transplant Surgeon, for his
co-operation and assistance in the collecting of some of
the clinical data, and Mr. James Blackhurst for his tech-
nical help. We gratefully acknowledge the "nancial sup-
port of the National Kidney Research Fund.
Appendix A. Dimensional analysis
In order to relate the measurements made in the "stula
model to the situation in vivo, the following dimensional
analysis was used. Consider the following group of vari-
ables:
(, , u , d, , u( , ).
The magnitude of the shear stress () exerted by the #uid
at the vessel wall is determined by the density () and
dynamic viscosity () of the #uid, its mean velocity (u ),
amplitude (u( ) and frequency () as it #ows through an
anastomosis of diameter d.
Applying Buckingham's theorem (see Massey, 1979),
it can be shown that
u
"
u d
,
u(
u
,
d
u
. (A.1)
Wall shear stress is therefore a function of the Reynolds
number (ud/), the ratio of the amplitude of pulsatile
velocity to mean velocity (u( /u ) and the Strouhal number
(d/u ).
Another dimensionless quantity, Womersley's fre-
quency parameter, , is given by
"
d
u
,
u d
.
It follows that
u
"
u d
,
u(
u
, d
.
The scaling law is obtained as follows. Because
the Reynolds number, the ratio (u( /u ), i.e. pulsatility
index, and frequency were all kept the same, and the
model was geometrically similar and true-to-scale, we
can write
?
/(
?
u
?
)
K
/(
K
uN
K
)
"1,
where the subscripts m and a denote the parameters in
the model and those in vivo, respectively. Thus,
?
"
K
?
u
?
K
u
K
. (A.2)
We now wish to "nd an expression for uN
?
/uN
K
. From
dynamic similarity,
?
u
?
d
?
?
"
K
u
K
d
K
K
,
u
?
u
K
"
K
d
K
d
?
,
where "/ is the kinematic viscosity. Since the model
is geometrically similar and true-to-scale, d
K
/d
?
"1, and
so
u
?
"u
K
. (A.3)
Substituting Eq. (A.3) into Eq. (A.2) gives
?
"
K
. (A.4)
The expressions in brackets in (A.3) and (A.4) represent
the scaling factors for velocity and shear stress respective-
ly. In this study, the scale factor for velocity was 0.618
and for shear stress it was 0.882;(0.618)"0.337.
Since Reynolds stress is the product of two velocity
components and density, the scale factor for this quantity
is
?
u
?
v
?
K
u
K
v
K