Professional Documents
Culture Documents
qmV
DS
nkT
__
I
m
1
_
exp
_
qmV
DS
nkT
__
1
where
n 1
C
d
C
it
C
ox
2
m 1
C
d
C
ox
3
I
m
I
0
exp
qV
GS
nkT
_ _
4
Here C
ox
is dened as the oxide capacitance, C
d
is the
depletion capacitance, and C
it
is the interface trap ca-
pacitance.
The extraction procedure for the interface trap density
D
it
C
it
=q requires the determination of the parameter n
from the log I
DS
vs. V
GS
transfer characteristics as
Solid-State Electronics 46 (2002) 15791582
www.elsevier.com/locate/sse
*
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: yuz3@lehigh.edu (Y.A. Zeng).
0038-1101/02/$ - see front matter 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S0038- 1101( 02) 00108- 9
n
q
2:3kT
o log I
DS
oV
GS
_ _
1
5
with a subthreshold swing dened by
S 2:3
kT
q
n volts=decade 6
A plot of log1 I
DS
=I
m
) vs. V
DS
yields the ratio
m
n
2:3
kT
q
o log 1
I
DS
Im
_ _
1
oV
DS
_
_
_
_
_
_ 7
where the parameter m is obtained by combining Eqs.
(5) and (7).
D
it
is extracted at a given gate bias V
GS
, which cor-
responds to a value of surface potential /
S
D
it
/
S
C
it
/
S
q
C
ox
q
n m 8
where /
F
6/
S
62/
F
, and the extracted interface trap
densities are located in the range of E
G
=2/
F
6E
C
E
T
6E
G
=2.
The relationship between gate voltage, V
GS
, and sur-
face potential, /
S
, is determined with the Berglund
technique [8] and the transconductance change method
[9], which yields the additive constant at /
S
/
F
, where
/
F
is the Fermi potential.
3. Device fabrication
Devices used in this work [2] are n-channel MOS-
FETs in the implanted p-wells on 6H- and 4H-SiC
(n/n
substrate
(10
18
cm
3
). The aluminum-implanted p-well has a
doping concentration of 10
17
cm
3
and a depth of 0.7
lm. Nitrogen is implanted to form source and drain
regions with doping of 10
19
cm
3
and junction depths of
0.4 lm. The thermally grown oxide thickness is about
400
AA. A schematic cross section of the MOSFET is
shown in Fig. 1.
4. Experimental results
Figs. 24 describe the measurements on device #1,
which is a 4H-SiC NMOS transistor with W =L 500
lm=10 lm.
Figs. 5 and 6 describe the measurements on device
#2, which is a 6H-SiC NMOS transistor with W =L
500 lm=10 lm.
5. Discussion
The extracted interface trap densities for 6H- and
4H-SiC MOSFET were replotted in Fig. 7 in order to
make a comparison.
Fig. 1. Schematic cross-section of the n-channel SiC MOS-
FETs.
Fig. 2. Transfer characteristic of 4H-SiC MOSFET with
W =L 500 lm=10 lm.
Fig. 3. Extraction of m=n ratio V
GS
5:0 is shown as an
example, m=n 0:277, n 41:0, m 11:4.
1580 Y.A. Zeng et al. / Solid-State Electronics 46 (2002) 15791582
In Fig. 7, the extracted interface trap densities for
both 4H and 6H-SiC MOSFETs show an exponential
increase when approaching the onset of strong inver-
sion. By comparing D
it
E
T
in 4H and 6H-SiC, we notice
that D
it
E
T
is much higher in 4H than in 6H-SiC. These
results are consistent with former reports (e.g. the data
from Hall eect measurement in Ref. [6]). In addition,
the subthreshold swing (with interface traps) of a SiC
MOSFET, which is reected in the value of parameter
n, is much larger than that of a Si MOSFET because of
the much higher interface trap densities in a SiC MOS-
FET.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. Anant K.
Agarwal and Nelson S. Saks for providing helpful in-
formation and discussions. We also thank a former
graduate student, Dr. Vickram R. Vathulya for fabri-
cating the devices. The nancial support of the Oce of
Naval Research (Dr. John C. Zolper) and the Sherman
Fairchild Foundation are gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] Arnold E et al., Interface states and eld-eect mobility in
6H-SiC MOS transistors. In: Proceedings of 7th ICSCRM.
1997. p. 1013.
[2] Vathulya VR, White MH. Characterization of inversion and
accumulation layer electron transport in 4H and 6H-SiC
MOSFETs on implanted P-type regions. IEEE Trans
Electron Dev 2000;47:2018.
[3] Saks NS, Mani SS, Agarwal AK. Interface trap prole near
the band edges at the 4H-SiC/SiO
2
interface. Appl Phys Lett
2000;76:2250.
[4] Arnold E, Alok D. Eect of interface states on electron
transport in 4H-SiC inversion layers. IEEE Trans Electron
Dev 2001;48:1870.
Fig. 4. Extracted interface trap density in 4H-SiC NMOS as a
function of trap energy.
Fig. 5. Transfer characteristic of 6H-SiC MOSFET with
W =L 500 lm=10 lm.
Fig. 6. Extracted interface trap density in 6H-SiC NMOS as a
function of trap energy.
Fig. 7. Comparison of D
it
E
T
in 6H and 4H-SiC.
Y.A. Zeng et al. / Solid-State Electronics 46 (2002) 15791582 1581
[5] Das MK, Um BS, Cooper Jr. JA. Mat Sci Forum 2000;338
342(2000):1069.
[6] Saks NS, Ancona MG, Rendell RW, Agarwal AK. Mea-
surement of the interface trap density in SiC MOS devices
using the Hall eect. In: Proceedings of 12th ICSCRM,
2001.
[7] Van Overstraeten RJ, Declerck GJ, Muls PA. Theory of the
MOS transistor in weak inversion new method to determine
the number of surface states. IEEE Trans Electron Dev
1975;22:282.
[8] Berglund PA. Surface states at steam-grown siliconsilicon-
dioxide interfaces. IEEE Trans Electron Dev 1966;13:701.
[9] Wong H-S, White MH, Krutsick TJ, Booth RVH. Model-
ing of transconductance degradation and determination of
threshold voltage in thin oxide MOSFETs. Solid-State Elec-
tron 1987;30:953.
1582 Y.A. Zeng et al. / Solid-State Electronics 46 (2002) 15791582