Professional Documents
Culture Documents
%
)
Before microbes treated
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
%
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
After microbes treated
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
%
)
Before microbes treated
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
carbon number
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
%
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
After microbes treated
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
%
)
Before microbes treated
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
%
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
After microbes treated
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
%
)
Before microbes treated
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
carbon number
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
%
)
3.3.4 Satisfying results are observed
with fluid production increase and water cut decrease
Fig. 14GC curve of crude oil in C1-Y21well before and after microbes
treated.
Seven out of the total 10 oil wells responded effectively, with an increase in fluid production and a decrease in
water cut, by the end of
December 2007. Monthly fluid
production increased from 957
tons to 1456 ton and water cut
decreased from 46.8% to
40.3% for the whole area. The
monthly oil production
increased from 361 tons to 843
tons (see Fig. 15). The
effective period lasted 3 years.
The accumulative oil production
amounted to 25,000 tons.
effect
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
monthly oil production
before microbes treated
monthly oil production
after microbes treated
monthly oil production
before microbes treated
monthly oil production
after microbes treated
monthly oil production
before microbes treated
monthly oil production
after microbes treated
monthly oil production
before microbes treated
monthly oil production
after microbes treated
Feb,2006
time
Dec,2006
Aug,2003 Jun,2004
Apr,2005 Oct,2007
0
Injection of
microbes
effect
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
y
i
e
l
d
(
y
i
e
l
d
(
y
i
e
l
d
(
y
i
e
l
d
(
t
/
m
)
monthly oil production
before microbes treated
monthly oil production
after microbes treated
monthly oil production
before microbes treated
monthly oil production
after microbes treated
monthly oil production
before microbes treated
monthly oil production
after microbes treated
monthly oil production
before microbes treated
monthly oil production
after microbes treated
Feb,2006
time
Dec,2006
Aug,2003 Jun,2004
Apr,2005 Oct,2007
0
effect
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
monthly oil production
before microbes treated
monthly oil production
after microbes treated
monthly oil production
before microbes treated
monthly oil production
after microbes treated
monthly oil production
before microbes treated
monthly oil production
after microbes treated
monthly oil production
before microbes treated
monthly oil production
after microbes treated
Feb,2006
time
Dec,2006
Aug,2003 Jun,2004
Apr,2005 Oct,2007
0
Injection of
microbes
effect
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
y
i
e
l
d
(
y
i
e
l
d
(
y
i
e
l
d
(
y
i
e
l
d
(
t
/
m
)
monthly oil production
before microbes treated
monthly oil production
after microbes treated
monthly oil production
before microbes treated
monthly oil production
after microbes treated
monthly oil production
before microbes treated
monthly oil production
after microbes treated
monthly oil production
before microbes treated
monthly oil production
after microbes treated
Feb,2006
time
Dec,2006
Aug,2003 Jun,2004
Apr,2005 Oct,2007
0
Based on the analysis of
producers in the field, several
characteristics of MEOR are
summarized below:
Fig. 15Oil rate performance of Chao50 microbial test area.
(1) Wells in pay zones with better
communication will show a better
response
The analysis shows that only the wells located in the pay zone responded effectively. Analysis of the injection profile
indicates that layer F132 has the highest injectivity. Injected microbe penetrated mainly into this layer and advanced along
the waterline. For the seven wells with effective response, daily fluid production increased significantly, from the previous
23.8 to 47.3 tons. The daily oil production increased from 10.5 to 30.5 tons. Meanwhile, the water cut decreased from
55.9% to 35.5%. Well 61-Y125, the one with the most effective response, is located between two injection wells, and also
lies in the latitudinal direction where fractures are well-developed. The fluid and oil production of this well increased
from 4.1 to 18.7 tons and 0.2 to 10.8 tons, respectively. The water cut decreased from 94.4% to 42.4% (see Figs.
16 and 17).
8 SPE114344
300
400
500
600
(2) Where fractures are not developed, wells with poor absorption respond slowly or not at all
Among the three wells that showed almost no response, except for Well C0-28 with water cut of about 100%,
Well C8-26 and Well C8-28 are not located in the fracture direction. It was very difficult for microbes to enter these
layers. Due to the difference in injectivity, along with injected water, microbes mainly entered the major reservoirs with
good injectivity (Figs. 18 and 19).
(3) MEOR contributes to the establishment of an effective drive system
Two wells (Well C0-24 and C2-26) among the 10 producers in the field test area had been closed for 3 years before the
microbe injection because of extremely low fluid production. After 3 months of microbe injection, fluid and oil production of
well C2-26 were maintained at about 1.0 ton and 0.2 ton, respectively. Currently, the water cut decreased below 50% and
daily oil production increased to 0.6 ton. The other well, C2-26, showed a similar response. The behavior of those once
abandoned wells indicates that MEOR technology contributes to the establishment of an effective drive system in the layers
into which microbes are injected (see Figs. 20 and 21).
0
100
200
20
40
60
80
100
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
300
400
500
600
0
100
200
20
40
60
80
100
time
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
w
a
t
e
r
c
u
t
(
%
)
y
i
e
l
d
(
t
/
m
)
300
400
500
600
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
water cut
0
100
200
20
40
60
80
100
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
300
400
500
600
0
100
200
20
40
60
80
100
time
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
w
a
t
e
r
c
u
t
(
%
)
y
i
e
l
d
(
t
/
m
)
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
water cut
Fig. 16Production performance of well C1-Y25.
w
a
t
e
r
c
u
t
(
%
)
y
i
e
l
d
(
t
/
m
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0
10
20
30
40
50
time
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0
10
20
30
40
50
time
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
water cut
w
a
t
e
r
c
u
t
(
%
)
y
i
e
l
d
(
t
/
m
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0
10
20
30
40
50
time
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0
10
20
30
40
50
time
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
water cut
Fig 17Production performance of well C2-12.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
decline curve
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
time
decline curve
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
water cut
y
i
e
l
d
(
t
/
m
)
w
a
t
e
r
c
u
t
(
%
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
decline curve
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
time
Fig. 18Production performance of well C8-26.
decline curve
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
water cut
y
i
e
l
d
(
t
/
m
)
w
a
t
e
r
c
u
t
(
%
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0
20
40
60
80
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
time
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
0
20
40
60
80
y
i
e
l
d
(
t
/
m
)
w
a
t
e
r
c
u
t
(
%
)
time
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
decline curve
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
decline curve
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
water cut
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0
20
40
60
80
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
time
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
0
20
40
60
80
y
i
e
l
d
(
t
/
m
)
w
a
t
e
r
c
u
t
(
%
)
time
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
decline curve
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
decline curve
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
water cut
Fig. 19Production performance of well C8-28.
50
60
0
10
20
30
40
70
0
20
40
60
80
100
time
Oct,2007
time
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
water cut
w
a
t
e
r
c
u
t
(
%
)
y
i
e
l
d
(
t
/
m
)
50
60
0
10
20
30
40
70
0
20
40
60
80
100
time
Oct,2007
time
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
water cut
w
a
t
e
r
c
u
t
(
%
)
y
i
e
l
d
(
t
/
m
)
Fig 20Production performance of well C2-26.
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 0
20
40
60
80
100
time
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 0
20
40
60
80
100
time
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
w
a
t
e
r
c
u
t
(
%
)
y
i
e
l
d
(
t
/
m
)
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
water cut
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 0
20
40
60
80
100
time
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 0
20
40
60
80
100
time
Feb,2006 Dec,2006 Aug,2003 Jun,2004 Apr,2005 Oct,2007
w
a
t
e
r
c
u
t
(
%
)
y
i
e
l
d
(
t
/
m
)
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
monthly mass production
monthly oil production
water cut
Fig. 21Production performance of well C0-24.
SPE114344 9
4 Conclusions
4.1 Two strains of bacteria, Brevibacillus brevis and Bacillus cereus, were screened from Daqing produced water. The
study showed that after microbial treatment, the viscosity of crude oil declined by 40% and wax content and gum content
dropped to varying degrees, improving the oil rheology. The coreflooding experiments showed that MEOR was able to
enhance oil recovery by 6.5% over that obtained by waterflooding.
4.2 A microbial huff n puff test injecting microbes and using hydrocarbons as the carbon source was carried out in 70
wells in Chaoyanggou and Pubei oilfields. The average incremental oil production for a single well was 171 tons and the
accumulative incremental oil production was 12700 tons.
4.3 Based on the success of MEOR stimulation, a pilot flood was implemented. The accumulative incremental oil was 13500
tons. The effective period lasted over 3 years. The MEOR field test in low-permeability reservoirs shows that formation
communication affects the results dramatically. It also indicates that the presence of reservoir microfractures is beneficial to
MEOR. Therefore, the combination of MEOR and fracturing deserves consideration for the development of low permeability
reservoirs.
References
Cheng H., Wang X., Xu D., et al. 2006. Experimental Research on EOR with the Application of Indigenous Microorganisms.
Petroleum Exploration and Development, 33(1): 9194, 110.
Dietrich F.L, Brown F. G, and Zhou Z.H. 1996. Microbial EOR Technology Advancement: Case Studies of Successful
Projects. Paper SPE 36746 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, 69 October.
DOI: 10.2118/36746-MS.
Feng, Q. and Chen, Z. 1999. Microbial Flooding Test in Block 7 of Area II, Eastern Dagang Oilfield. Petroleum Exploration
and Development, 26(6): 6871.
Feng, Q., Yang, H., Nazina, T. N., et al. 2005. Pilot Test of Indigenous Microorganism Flooding in Kongdian Oilfield.
Petroleum Exploration and Development, 32(5):125129.
Gao, X., et al. 1999. Enhancing Oil Recovery with the Application of Microbial Profile Modification. Petroleum Journal,
20(5): 5457.
Hou, Q. 2005. Natural Gas Play Targets in Gulong Area, Songliao Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 32(5): 38
41.
Hou, Z. et al. 2005. The Mechanism and Application of MEOR by Brevibacillus brevis and Bacillus cereus in Daqing Oilfield.
Paper SPE 97469 presented at the SPE International Improved Oil Recovery Conference in Asia Pacific, Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia, 56 December. DOI 10.2118/97469-MS.
Huang, X., Wu, X., and Hou, Z. 2006. Mechanism of Degradation for Petroleum Hydrocarbon by Brevibacillus brevis and
Bacillus cereus. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 27(5): 9295.
Li, X., et al. 2002. Application of Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery to J ilin Oilfield. Petroleum Exploration and
Development, 29(6): 9496.
Lu, Z. ,et al. 2002. Pilot Test of Microbe Water Shutoff and Profile Modification in Fuyu Oilfield. Petroleum Geology &
Oilfield Development in Daqing, 21(5): 4853.
J iang, Y., Xu, D. , Chen, J ., et al. 2005. Single Well Microbial Treatment Technology and Its Field Application Results.
Petroleum Exploration and Development, 32(2): 104106.
Portwood, J . T. 1995. A Commercial Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery Technology: Evaluation of 322 Projects. Paper SPE
29518 presented at the SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 24 April. DOI: 10.2118/29518-
MS.
Ren, X., Liu, N., Qu, Z., et al. 2005. Effect of Wettability Alteration on the Relative Permeability of Low-Permeability Water-
Wet Oil and Gas Reservoirs. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 32(3):123124,134.
Streeb L. P, and Brown, F.G. 1992. MEOR-Altamont/Bluebell Field Project. Paper SPE 24334 presented at the SPE Rocky
Mountain Regional Meeting, Casper, Wyoming, 1821 May. DOI 10.2118/24334-MS
Wang, G. and Liu, Y. 2005. Microbial Degradation to Heavy Oil in Heidimiao. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in
Daqing, 24(2): 7577.
Wang, W., et al. 2002. Present Situation and Development Prospects of Microbiological Recovery Technology in China.
10 SPE114344
Petroleum Exploration and Development, 29(6): 8790.
Wang, W., Wei, B., Tan, Y., et al. 2004. Problems to Be Solved for Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery. 2004. Petroleum
Exploration and Development, 31(6): 8891.
Wang, X., Chen, Z., Li, X., et al. 2005. Microbial Flooding in Guan 69 Block, Dagang Oilfield. 2005. Petroleum Exploration
and Development, 32(2): 107109.
Xing, B., et al. 2000. Application of Microbial Recovery Technique to Chaoyanggou Oilfield. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield
Development in Daqing, 19(5): 4749.
Yang, T., Wang, X., et al. 2005. Evaluation on the Effect of Continuous Injection Experiment in Polymer Producing Bacteria
Blocks of J ilin Oilfield. 2005. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in DaQing, 24(1): 8081.
Zhang, Y., et al. 2001. Experimental Research on Heavy Oil Degradation and Enhancing Oil Recovery by Microbial
Treatments. Petroleum Journal, 22(1): 5456.
Zhang, J ., Zhou, Z., Wang, W., et al. 2004. EOR Field Test of Gas-Water Alternative Injection in Pubei Oilfield. Petroleum
Exploration and Development, 31(6): 8587.