Succulent plants from down under Adventive Plants (Part 6):
Its time for an erratum Agave americana Pictures and more
XIV. Its time for an erratum
After almost two years of writing these accounts on naturalization of succulent plants in New Zealand it was the time I think to take few steps back and have a critical look at everything I have written. I was aware of few of the errors made - a good excuse is the fact that I am an amateur still on a steep learning curve; however, even if I have briefly mentioned some of them in subsequent articles now its time I think to substantiate a bit.
a) Sedum decumbens vs. Sedum kimnachii
In Part 2, Chapter VI. - The Sedum Group I wrote:
Sedum decumbens R. T. Clausen 1975 [Mexico] was collected as early as 1986 at Britannia Heights in Nelson by Sykes who published the naturalization of this plant in 1988 in vol. 4 of Flora of New Zealand and in his 1989 Checklist. However, it doesnt seem to spread too much since and being collected just from few localities as Goose Bay (Marlborough) and Banks Peninsula (Christchurch) and also few other places in Canterbury. It prefers the roadsides where it grows usually hidden between grasses or taller vascular plants. As an alpine plant it obviously prefers a cooler climate and its distribution is apparently restricted to the South Island. However, two collections of a very similar plant (7) were made in Wanganui and Wellington, the latter on very steep clay bank on roadside; patch sprawling down bank among Crassula multicava and partly overtopped by Coprosproma repens on a north aspect. This plant reminds of a miniature Sedum praealtum and is also often confused with Sedum palmeri Watson the main difference being that the latter has more or less glaucous and usually smaller leaves. Plants now treated as Sedum decumbens have previously been included within a broader concept of Sedum confusum Hemsley.
And further down:
In the end few words about what I think it is a disputed name - Sedum kimnachii Byalt 1999 [Mexico]. This is a recent segregation from Sedum decumbens (and still considered by some botanists a synonym of this taxon and of Sedum clausenii Byalt 1998). There is one problem though (even if we accept the validity of this new taxon) both in cultivation and nature it is very often mislabeled / misidentified as Sedum decumbens or even as Sedum confusum which makes me rather skeptical in this case. No recent account which might include it as a New Zealand naturalized plant is known to me except New Zealand Plant Conservation Network (www.nzpcn.org.nz) with a last minute addition; the plants photographed by Jeremy Rolphe in October 2007 in Lower Hutt, north of Stokes (Wellington) have definitely a different look from other plants labeled Sedum decumbens I have seen. However, Sedum decumbens has some degree of natural variability and to put it this way Im rather keen to hear a second opinion from a different PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 2 botanic authority. As apparently no other collections have been done yet other than those recorded as Sedum decumbens (?) outside the known distribution area of this plant and which probably have already lost any scientific relevance - it is too early for this; see (7) again.
Ray Stephenson has sent me last August not the second opinion as I was asking for, but The Opinion regarding these Sedum taxons. Shortly after I have joined ICN he kindly sent me an email and later on two short published references clarifying this matter for me.
Ulrich described Sedum aoikon back in 1917, a plant of unknown origin as the natural habitat was and still is a mystery using for this purpose two of the specimens he was growing in his greenhouse. This description was soon readily available to the public and because of being an undemanding plant Sedum aoikon became very popular in collections. A string of errors had to follow. In 1959 R.T. Clausen considered Sedum purpusii Rose (not Kunze) as being a synonym, although he made this assessment based on dried herbarium exemplars. He also couldnt provide a location or a habitat type for this plant, despite of his extensive field trips (1). He couldnt even find cultivated plants as described by Hemsley in 1878, but instead, earlier in 1948, R.T. Clausen erroneously keyed differences between Sedum confusum and Sedum aoikon. In his Sedum of North America (1975) R.T. Clausen finally took a step back and considered that the opinion now is that the types of both S. confusum and S. aoikon apply to the same species, with the oldest name of Sedum confusum Hemsley 1878 having priority. At about the same time R.T. Clausen became aware of the fact that a plant distributed in California as early as 1931 with the label of Sedum confusum to which although it is obviously related, does not match the description of Sedum aoikon by having much smaller but thicker leaves, by forming rosettes at the stem tips and because of important differences of the inflorescence, more open and with a lighter colour of the flowers.
R.T. Clausen considered that a new name is needed for this plant and described it with the name of Sedum decumbens. Ray Stephenson (1991) considers that S. decumbens is as common in British collections as S. confusum, but both are labeled S. confusum or very rarely S. purpusii. As most nurserymen would still use Clausens earlier book (1959) for identification, the myth is perpetuated.
But we are only halfway through the story. In later years the name Sedum decumbens became increasingly used in trade and in nurseries, and hobbyists have been made aware of the difference finally things appeared to have settled. However, V.V. Byalt has uncovered that Luc has previously used this name in 1823 in order to describe a variation of Sedum (Hylotelephium) telephium of the Estonian Baltic island of Saaremaa. It took some time for people to adapt and use Clausens name, and even things seemed to have settled there was already time for a new name change. Byalt proposed in 1998 a new name Sedum clausenii, honouring R.T. Clausen but making an error of his own as this name was a homonym too by being used in the same year by Prez Calix. V.V. Byalt corrected this by proposing a year later a new name Sedum kimnachii, a name which honours Myron Kimnach.
It will take again probably some time for the hobbyists to adjust in using this new name but at least I got it now. To my defense I have to say that both names Sedum kimnachii and Sedum decumbens are still alternatively used in New Zealand accounts, which may have contributed to my confusion.
PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 3
b) The Rangitoto Aeonium plants
In Part 4, Chapter X. A brief overview of the adventive succulent flora of Rangitoto there is a series of misidentifications of Aeonium plants growing on Rangitoto. I have corrected these errors (2) in an article for ICN (Zimer, 2008), but still I have to make it here as well.
I have identified this plant as Aeonium undulatum hybrid, but this is only half true. Giuseppe Tavormina has identified this plant as Aeonium undulatum x Aeonium haworthii, a type very similar to the hybrid Ray Stephenson. What is truly amazing about Giuseppes correct identification is that he has seen the 1. Aeonium undulatum x Aeonium haworthii PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 4 similarity to this hybrid although the Aeonium was dormant at the time the photo was taken. When simply comparing the Rangitoto photo with few photos of the hybrid Ray Stephenson you can find on the Internet it takes a lot of knowledge and a good eye to see the similarity. Months later I can see myself that a cultivated plant of this type collected from Rangitoto looks much more like Ray Stephenson plants depicted on the Internet.
I have identified this plant as Aeonium ciliatum or possibly one of its hybrids, which was a gross mistake, the plant being the true Aeonium undulatum (Giuseppe has corrected again my misidentification).
2. Aeonium undulatum PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 5
The plants here are of course Aeonium undulatum x Aeonium haworthii (on the left) and Aeonium undulatum (on the right).
c) The Cakile maritima confusion
Even if this was just a short commentary on one of the pictures illustrating Part 3, Chapter VIII. Carpobrotus edulis, a friendly alien? this was a quite embarrassing error, being made with no judgment at all. To the picture below
3. Aeonium undulatum x Aeonium haworthii (on the left) and Aeonium undulatum (on the right).
PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 6
I made the following commentary:
On Whangamata Beach (Coromandel) Carpobrotus edulis (the yellow flowering form) is present just on smaller patches, growing among native succulent sand dunes flora.
This native plant is Cakile maritima, the well-known European Searocket. I didnt know anything about this particular plant not to speak of the extremely little knowledge I had (and still have) about the Brassicaceae, the mustard family, but still I was under the impression that this must be a native plant. The Whangamata (Coromandel Peninsula) plants were growing in a very composite environment, the sand dunes being altered in more or less recent times and scattered not only with Carpobrotus edulis, but also with other plants like Agapanthus praecox ssp. orientalis and other alien plants (not to mention the tourists). On the other hand the Opoutere plants just a short stretch to the North appeared to be fully integrated in what seemed to be a little altered sand dunes habitat, growing together with native Spiniflex and Calystegia species and with far less tourists willingly to take the walk through the bush to the remote 4. Carpobrotus edulis with Cakile maritima. PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 7 beach, but packed instead with nesting birds. The growth form was also somewhat different it looked like a real wild plant, quite distinct from the Whangamata plants with a cultivated look and sustained growth. I have regarded this plant as being native, with the little doubt, which usually pairs up with ignorance, but having in mind to research the matter - which I eventually did. However, this error slipped into the text at a time I still had no idea what kind of plant this may be.
XV. Agave americana
The first reasonable thing to do when discussing about the naturalized Agave americana plants in New Zealand is to underline the fact that we deal with a very complex species, with two dozens or more of forms, varieties and subspecies lumped together under a single umbrella. I have seen this plant in three occasions so far here in the wild, and in many aspects each group was distinct from each other. It is hard to believe that we may encounter here the same variety of forms as in Mexico, but definitely there are a lot of distinct forms in cultivation, both true forms and of horticultural origin. It is in fact a very popular landscaping plant and there is no wonder that sooner or later some clones have managed to escape cultivation.
5. One of the larger Agave americana on Rangitoto, possibly 50m 60 cm high. PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 8 Agave americana is in fact one of the first naturalized succulent plants being observed in New Zealand. T. Kirk first mentioned it in 1869 as being established in North Shore (Auckland), but the earliest botanical collection made by W.R.B. Oliver at Seatoun (Wellington) and is dated February 1942. The plant is quite widespread in the North Island, being established especially in coastal areas of Auckland, Bay of Plenty and Wellington, and on several islands of Hauraki Gulf (Auckland) and Firth of Thames (Coromandel). There are just two confirmed locations in the South Island - Kaikoura (Marlborough) and Waipara (Canterbury), but I wouldnt wonder to hear that plants have been sighted in other areas as well. Originally this is a typical dry coastal plant and therefore in New Zealand it prefers dry rocky slopes with a strong marine exposure (3). There are no high infestation areas though, but there are few sites (especially on islands) where the plant is present in significant numbers. In New Zealand it is considered an invasive plant.
New Zealand botanists make no distinction between different forms and subspecies, Agave americana being described as a very large perennial plant with rosette growth form. The leaves are up to 2 m long, are fleshy and triangular in cross section. The leaves are leathery, glaucous and have coarse teeth on 6. General view of the Agave americana colony with lava blocks and grass tussocks. PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 9 the margins. Leaves are usually dull green, although a variegated form is also present. After 10 to 15 years vegetative growth it produces a large woody spike (scape) up to 10 m tall with a terminal panicle of many yellow flowers. Black seeds are produced in 5 cm long capsules. (4)
New Zealand plants are definitely escapes from cultivation. The first group of plants I have seen here shortly after moving to New Zealand was in Aucklands North Shore, in a light bush like area, close to the shore and to residential areas as well. The few smallish plants I have seen had broad glaucous leaves, some of them stiff, some bent, and definitely did not belong there
My second encounter was probably the most spectacular succulent plant seen by me in the wild, but unfortunately I didnt have at that time a digital camera to immortalize the plant. It was in late 2003 on the northern end of the Mt. Maunganui beach, towards the sand dunes. A huge Agave americana var. marginata growing isolated on the beach, catching the eye in an instant. The plant was possibly over 2 meters high and across with its spreading stiff leaves, and grew among its numerous suckers spread as far as 10 m or possibly even more in the fine sand of the beach. I was truly amazed, first of all by the substrate. I would have never believed that it could thrive in such fine sand. I dug out 30 or 40 centimeters and there was still pure fine sand, it could have been even few meters layer of sand until you hit the solid ground and suckers running everywhere nearby in many dozens, from 5 centimeters plantlets to well established young plants of 30 cm or more. No dwellings in the area, but the Mt. Maunganui sand dunes have been for years allegedly the preferred garden waste dumping space in the area (but this was to be learned few years later). What I truly regret is that I didnt use one of the very few shots left on my film camera and that I didnt collect one of the smaller suckers thinking of course that as I didnt have too much space to offer in my greenhouse there was no point in taking one.
A third direct encounter was on Rangitoto Island and for this one I will take now the time. Odd enough, even Hauraki Gulf islands are vaguely mentioned in the distribution area of Agave americana in New Zealand, there is no botanical account placing the plant on Rangitoto, although everybody is keen to nominate this iconic landmark. Hard to explain I think it is highly unlikely that none of the botanist publishing checklists of naturalized plants or other papers knew anything about this; fact is that no one has ever mentioned the plant here. Wotherspoon & Wotherspoon (ca. 2002) is the only major environmental paper mentioning the plant on Rangitoto, being a Priority Class 2 plant, with a long-term management objective of Eradication and a five-year management objective of Zero Density. No information on the current status (as of 2002) was given, but when I visited in January 2008 Rangitoto the control program appeared to be well on target, as no adult plants seemed to be present.
First of all I see no value in eradicating Agave americana from Rangitoto; as I already mentioned in relation with the Aeonium colony (5) there is no harm in this, but only a gain in keeping a contained unique colony here. It would be rather more effective and useful to eradicate plants such as Crassula multicava, plants being able to form a dense ground cover that prevents the regeneration of native species (Wotherspoon & Wotherspoon, ca. 2002) which seem to be almost out of control. We all know that vegetation control is very expensive and that everyone is on a budget, but I think that a direct and sustained approach is always better and (at least in this case) financially affordable say a $1 surcharge on the ferry ticket than an apparently cheaper, but indirect, sophisticated and highly unreliable approach as stated further in the above cited paper: Weed control experience on Rangitoto has shown that all the weeds at a given site are best treated at the same time. Many of the weedy areas around bach communities have a ground tier dominated by the lower priority weeds Nephrolepsis cordifolia (Davalliaceae) and Crassula multicava. Any area treated for a higher priority weed is rapidly invaded PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 10 by these species and their dense growth obscures seedlings of higher priority weeds such as Rhamnus and Asparagus asparagoides (Liliaceae) (6). Initial control of the class 1 weeds is now complete, and yearly follow-ups control usually incorporates the lower priority weeds at the site. The priority for control of sectors rests on the distribution of the more widely distributed, high priority class 2 weeds. The general strategy aims to slow the spread of weeds by controlling the least infested of the sectors first, working towards the most heavily infested areas. In my opinion this would be insufficient in some instances and excessive (and in the end a waste of funds) in other cases like Agave americana for instance. However, no matter if a class-layer, zonal or a targeted one-by-one approach, there is little hope of completely getting rid of weeds like Crassula multicava, but we can successfully control slow growing architectural plants like Agave americana instead I am not sure that this is really the best outcome though. Personally I think that Zero Density control and a contained are of dispersal would be more effective (both financially and ecologically) it is much easier to prevent Agave americana from flowering (it takes a relatively long time for the flower spike to mature) with a meaningful aim to avoid short range dispersal by birds or by other means than aiming to a complete eradication - pointless and more expensive in the same time. Dispersal on a restricted area is much harder to control as rhizomes are sent from a mother plant in all directions when still young and far from the flowering age why not preserve the colony under a fairly strict control?
7. One of the isolated plants towards the southern end of the colony growing on a different substrate. PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 11 If the Aeonium colony is the most interesting succulent display on Rangitoto, the Agave americana colony north of Islington Bay wharf is definitely second in line. It occupies a quite restricted area halfway between the wharf and the passage to Motutapu Island, on an almost open lava field, barely covered here and there with grass tussocks, on a mild slope ending abrupt in the vicinity of the sea where on a narrow salt marsh strip Sarcocornia quinqueflora grows in abundance. Just very few plants are outside a core area of only few thousands square meters. The substrate defies again our expectations bare lava with accumulations of rocky soils in pockets, due to early erosion or maybe rather remnants of ashes deposited during the terminal phases of volcanic activity, rich in minerals and extremely poor in organic matter. A landscape that is quite different from the Mt. Maunganui beach, not to speak from most of the well-maintained Auckland gardens. However, the plants thrive on Rangitoto and are possibly in their many hundreds, including the small suckers. Vegetation control (Zero Density at this stage) seems to be very effective as no mature plants were seen.
The plants are also quite different from the most of the plants you can see in Auckland gardens mainly slender specimens or variegated forms of horticultural origins; as there is a presence of Agave americana in Hauraki Gulf and Great Auckland area of over 140 years we possibly deal here with original, unaltered stock. A second remark all plants look quite similar, no variations whatsoever, most plants fit in the same growth pattern, rather short leafed plants, more glaucous than the average, with stiff to slightly outward recurved leaves (not bent, not linear either), of gray-green colour showing distinct imprints on the young leaves. I might be wrong, but my 50 Cents worth is that in this instance we have a clone of one of the very variable Agave americana ssp. protamericana Gentry 1982 (7); however, without mature and flowering plants it is hard to support this point in any way.
Agave americana is very popular in outdoor cultivation, possibly the most extensive cultivated Agave. Easy to cultivate and adaptable, the plant prefers coastal bluffs and cliffs, sand dunes, rocky places, rocky grasslands, and other disturbed sites. Its native habitat consists of subtropical to warm-temperate regions of Mexico, and has managed to escape from cultivation in many regions of Mediterranean Europe, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand and many Pacific Islands such as Lord Howe Island, Pagan Island, Cook Islands, Galpagos, Fiji, French Polynesia Islands, Tahiti, and many others, usually not putting pressure on native habitats, but on occasion becoming invasive as it happened in Palau, Ogasawara Islands (Japan), or New Caledonia.
While finishing this article I am only days away from a new trip to Rangitoto, accompanied by my younger son, you can imagine I can hardly wait. This time my intention is to scan the southern coast and the former bach community there, the prison, the quarry and (only if we will have the time) Wilsons Park - the remnants of the intended Botanic Garden. Off track browsing is not always easy and it is usually progressing very slowly; however I might have a bit of extra time for a short leap on the eastern coast to pay a visit to my favourite sites here the Aeonium and the Agave colonies.
XVI. Pictures and more
I think it might be interesting for the reader to insert few of the pictures and maps worth seeing, which I havent used in previous chapters. Here we go:
PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 12
8. A general map of Rangitoto Island might be of good use after dozens of references to locations on this island. 9. The gap between Rangitoto Island and Motutapu Island at low tide (when it can be crossed by foot) and few hours later when the tide is picking up. It is a really insignificant channel, however, no vegetation exchange has been observed between the islands. Each has its own geologic and biologic profile. PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 13
10. Carpobrotus edulis, the yellow flowering form on Motutapu Island. 11. This is one of the indefinite forms of the Aeonium colony of Rangitoto. The Aeonium haworthii parentage is clearly visible, however, it differs from the true species and from the Aeonium undulatum x Aeonium haworthii hybrid. PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 14
12. A Crassula coccinea still in flower in late January on the eastern coast of Rangitoto Island, close to the Islington Bay wharf. 13. Crassula multicava growing in a shaded position on Rangitoto Island, west of the Islington Bay wharf. It may sound funny, but I was just explaining to my younger son that in such a dark corner there is not even a slim chance to find succulent plants as I saw this plant in the extension of my highly academic finger. A reminder that everything is possible. PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 15
14. One of the many dead Aloe maculata I have seen on Rangitoto Island. Contrary to their normal habit, they were never forming here large clumps or crowded colonies here. 15. Carpobrotus edulis, the pink flowering form at Ninety Mile Beach. I have never managed to take a picture to an open flower of the pink form; I was always arriving too late in the evening or too early in the morning. PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 16
16. The fascinating sand dunes of Ninety Mile Beach. Trailing stems of Carpobrotus edulis can be seen on the dunes. 17. Habitat picture from Muriwai, on Aucklands west coast. The plateau and the steeps are home for the South African Carpobrotus edulis, for the native Disphyma australe ssp. australe and for the sensational natural hybrid between the two. PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 17
18. This photo should have been part of my erratum. In the first part of this series I have stated that at Piha - Lion Rock Cotyledon orbiculata var. orbiculata grows not directly on rock, but in a thin sandy soil. One year later I have discovered that on one side of the rock few plants were growing on the vertical cliff faces. 19. Cotyledon orbiculata var. orbiculata on Lion Rock. PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 18
20. Cotyledon orbiculata var. orbiculata on Lion Rock. (left) 21. One of the mysteries of Lion Rock the unknown variant (or hybrid?) of Cotyledon orbiculata var. orbiculata. (below) PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 19
22. Carpobrotus edulis at Muriwai, a plant growing in a somewhat more sheltered spot and displaying therefore untypical growth. (Compare it with the picture from the article dedicated to Disphyma australe ssp. australe). (right) 23. The yellow flowering form of Carpobrotus edulis under the harsh sun of Port Waikato sand dunes. (below) PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 20
24. The strong marine exposure of the Port Waikato sand dunes is clearly visible from this picture. 25. Its not an adventive succulent, but the native Sarcocornia quinqueflora ssp. quinqueflora growing on the vertical cliff faces at Raglan. PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 21
26. Opuntia monacantha at Eastern Beach, Howick, Auckland. (right) 27. Tradescantia fluminensis, aka The Wandering Jew a plant with marginal succulence from the southeastern Brazilian rainforests. It is one of the most invasive New Zealand naturalized plants. (below) PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 22
28. 29. Cakile maritima at the Opoutere beach (Coromandel). PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 23
30. Opoutere - just few meters from the heat of the sand is the raging Pacific Ocean. (left) 31. In the end - a last glimpse on the Cotyledon orbiculata var. orbiculata plants cramped to the fissures of the cliff faces at Piha Lion Rock (below) PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Page 24
Additional References:
H. S. Gentry - Agaves of Continental North America, 1982;
Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk (PIER);
Ray Stephenson Notes on Sedum decumbens Clausen and Sedum confusum Hemsley (in The Sedum Society Newsletter No. 16 January 1991);
Wikipedia, the free Encyclopedia;
E. Zimer The naturalized Aeonium of Rangitoto Island (Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand) (on International Crassulaceae Network, 2008).http://www.crassulaceae.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=368:naturalized-aeoniums-on-rangitoto-island-new-zealand- 2&catid=62:habitat&Itemid=26
My Notes:
(1) Sedum purpusii Rose has been collected by Carl Purpus between Esperanza and Orizaba, with no other indication of the locality. R.T. Clausen couldnt locate the habitat of this plant but he was sure that the dried herbarium specimens of Sedum purpusii were the same species as Sedum aoikon.
(2) Giuseppe Tavormina has kindly corrected my errors while a short account on Aeonium naturalized on Rangitoto Island was prepared for publication on the ICN website.
(3) As it might be the case here, the actual distribution area reflects the simple fact that the little competition and the great variety of coastal environments was far more adequate for this plant than the humid and densely vegetated bush land.
(4) Description extracted from New Zealand Plant Conservation Network, modified ex A. J. Healy and E. Edgar -Flora of New Zealand, Vol. 3, 1980. The lifespan of the plants might not be entirely true, other authors consider it up to 30 years. However, this might also depend on climatic factors.
(5) Briefly mentioned at the end of the article The naturalized Aeonium of Rangitoto Island (Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand) published on the ICN website.
(6) Currently included in their own family, the Asparagaceae.
(7) In Agaves of Continental North America (1982) H.S. Gentry segregates a complex and highly variable form of ssp. americana: Agave americana protamericana is a wild complex scattered along the Sierra Madre Oriental, notable as much for its variability as for its americana character. Subspecies protamericana differs from the varieties of americana in its greater variability in form and color of the leaves and their armature, in the proportions of flower tubes to tepals, the tube being relatively deeper. The leaves of protamericana are generally shorter and the inflorescence generally has fewer branches.
------------------------------------------------
All errors, omissions and misconceptions are mine.
Eduart Zimer, December 2008 - January 2009
http://eduart.page.tl/Home.htm
PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com