This case talks about the pavement dwellers and public interest organizations which claims eviction of pavement dwellers would violate right to life under the Constitution by depriving them of their livelihood; right to life includes protection of means of livelihood; obligations to provide natural justice before eviction but no automatic right to resettlement under Indian constitutional law.
Original Title
OLGA TELLIS & ORS v BOMBAY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL HOUSING RIGHTS
This case talks about the pavement dwellers and public interest organizations which claims eviction of pavement dwellers would violate right to life under the Constitution by depriving them of their livelihood; right to life includes protection of means of livelihood; obligations to provide natural justice before eviction but no automatic right to resettlement under Indian constitutional law.
This case talks about the pavement dwellers and public interest organizations which claims eviction of pavement dwellers would violate right to life under the Constitution by depriving them of their livelihood; right to life includes protection of means of livelihood; obligations to provide natural justice before eviction but no automatic right to resettlement under Indian constitutional law.
OLGA TELLIS & ORS v BOMBAY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL HOUSING RIGHTS
SUBMITTED BY: UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF: SHOBHIT SAINESH AWASTHI MR SHASHANK SHEKHAR ROLL NO: 130 FACULTY OF LAW SECTION B DR. RAM MANOHAR LOHIYA B.A. LLB (Hons.), SEMESTER I NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY
SIGNATURE OF STUDENT SIGNATURE OF PROFESSOR
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Firstly, I would like to thank respected Professor C. M. Jariwala and Ms. SHASHANK SHEKHAR, for giving me such a golden opportunity to show my skills and capability through this project. This project is the result of the extensive ultrapure study, hard work and labour, put into to make it worth reading. It is my pleasure to be indebted to various people, who directly or indirectly contributed in the development of this work and who influenced my thinking, behaviour, and acts during the course of study. Lastly, I would like to thank the almighty and my parents for their moral support and my friends with whom I shared my day-to-day experience and received lots of suggestions that improved my quality of work.
LIST OF ABBREVIATION A.I.R :- ALL INDIA REPORTER S.C.C. :- SUPREME COURT CASES S.C.R. :- SUPREME COURT REPORTER B.M.C. :- BOMBAY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL U.P. :- UTTAR PRADESH
CASES REFFERED: Basheshar Nath v. The Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi (1959) Supp. 1 S.C.R. 528 Kharak Singh v. The State of U.P. [1964] 1 S.C.R. 332
OBJECTIVE:. To understand how the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in this case is greatly influenced by the thoughts of humanity. To understand whether right to livelihood is an integral part of right to life To understand Rationale, Reason and Jurisprudence of Olga Tellis.
To observe the various laws and their impact on the society dealing with this problem HYPOTHESIS: The judgment given in Olga Tellis v BMC case was highly influenced by the thoughts of humanity. Hence, this research project will focus on the main principles or issues which were considered by the honourable Supreme Court in this case.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND LITERATURE REVIEW: The research methodology adopted for making this project is doctrinal method. It is concerned with the analysis of legal doctrine and how it has been developed and applied. It consist of a complex and in-depth analysis of legal reasoning.
INTRODUCTION: This case talks about the pavement dwellers and public interest organizations which claims eviction of pavement dwellers would violate right to life under the Constitution by depriving them of their livelihood; right to life includes protection of means of livelihood; obligations to provide natural justice before eviction but no automatic right to resettlement under Indian constitutional law.
TENTATIVE HEADS: Introduction Case Historical background Arguments of the petitioner Arguments of the respondent The judgment Significance of the case