CHE 431 Industry Immersion (OJT) OJT Report Rubric Student Name: ____________________________ Faculty Assessor: ______________________________ Does Not Meet Expectations (1-5 pts) Meets Expectations (6-8 pts) Exceeds Expectations (9-10 pts) Score Writing Criteria Structure (5%) Paragraphs are poorly organized; use of sections is illogical and hinders document navigation Paragraphs are usually well- organized; use of sections is logical and generally allows easy navigation of the document All paragraphs are well-organized; use of sections is logical and allows easy navigation through the document
Mechanics (5%) Sentences are poorly written; there are numerous incorrect word choices and errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling Sentences are generally well-written; there are few incorrect word choices and errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling Sentences are well-written; there are no incorrect word choices and the text is free of errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling.
Graphs and Figures (5%) Graphs and figures are of poor quality and fail to support the text. Graphs and figures are of good quality and adequately support the text. All graphs and figures are creative, professional and strongly support the text.
Content Criteria On-the-Job Training Activities (15%) Fails to provide an overview and definition of the scope of the OJT program; specific activities are not adequately described. Provides an adequate overview and general explanation on the scope of the OJT program; specific activities are adequately described. Provides a thorough overview and definition of the scope of the OJT program; descriptions of specific activities are well-detailed.
Learning Narrative (50%) Fails to relate OJT experiences to learning acquired in the BSChE program; narrative lacks insight. Adequately relates OJT experiences to learning acquired in the BSChE program; narrative contains average insights. Thoroughly relates OJT experiences to learning acquired in the BSChE program; narrative is highly original and communicates creative insights.
Recommendations (20%)
Recommendations are trivial and/or do not have concrete bases. Recommendations are with clear bases and address important areas of improvement; specific and realistic. Recommendations are insightful, have clear bases and addresses critical issues; specific and realistic.