You are on page 1of 25

Results-Based Planning and

Monitoring for Inclusive Design in


Transport
September 12, 2014
Bernard Woods
SPD/SPRU
Agenda
1. Inclusive design
2. Results chain
3. Who is missing / not benefitting?
4. Inclusion in the DMF
5. Indicators
Strategic Intent vs. Measurement
Strategic intent is at the core of your design
Results framework translates your strategic
intent into a results chain
Indicators measure achievement of strategic
intent
If inclusion is not part of your strategic intent,
just having indicators will not bring
inclusiveness
Results Chain Simple Rule
Produced
Delivered
Used by
Beneficiary
Benefit
of Use
Output Outcome Impact
People Design
Transport
Output Outcome Impact
Produced
Delivered
Used by
Beneficiary
Benefit
of Use
Roads built/
upgraded
People /
goods travel
from A to B
Income,
education,
health, etc
Transport what do we measure?
Output Outcome Impact
Produced
Delivered
Used by
Beneficiary
Benefit
of Use
Km of roads built/
upgraded
Average daily
passengers,
freight cost
Mortality rate,
Household income,
graduation
rate
Who is Missing?
Who is not using?
Who is not benefitting from use?
Airstrips built
Faster, affordable
travel
Increased income
Inclusiveness: Project Level Benefits / Beneficiaries
Whose income
is increasing?
Who is
travelling?
Who can
access?
Output Outcome Impact
Who is missing not using?
Who do we
miss by
counting
average
daily
passengers?
What can you say about these users?
Transport -What we need to do at
the design stage?
Look at the needs of different user groups
What do women need in terms of safety?
Look at the barriers to use
How do differently abled people access the
system?
Look at how different groups use the outputs
differently
Where do poorer people live? Where do they
need to go?
Design and Monitoring Framework
Design Summary Performance Targets and
Indicators with Baselines
Impact 1 statement Multiple indicators
Outcome 1
statement
Multiple indicators
Outputs multiple
statements
Multiple indicators
I nclusion
Measurement of Inclusion
Deconstructing Indicators
Indicator Options
Number of
People travelingfrom farm to market
centers increases to 5,000/yrby 2018
(2013 Baseline: 2,000/yr)
Result (Change we want)
Indicator (How we will count it)
Targets& Baselines (How much increase
fromwhere we are now, by when)
I nclusion
What should we measure People
Travelling?
Who is travelling?
Sex
Age
Income group
Differently abled
Marginalized group identity
Location
?
How can we measure inclusion
People Travelling?
Number of
People travelingfrom farm to market
centers increases to 5,000/yrby 2018
(2013 Baseline: 2,000/yr)
Number of
Poor/female/indigenouspeople
travelingfrom farm to market
centers increases to 5,000/yrby 2018
2 Indicator Options for included
group(s)
Inclusive result Transport costs for poor women
reduced
1. Standalone indicator- #of poor women with reduced
transport costs
2. Component of indicator- #of women with reduced
transport costs, of which half are poor
Disaggregated data- #(M/F) of people with reduced
transport costs[no poor, no female target]
When counting people alwayssex-disaggregate
Output, Outcome and Impact
Indicators
Output Indicators
(Produced / Delivered)
Spatial Location
% of urban rail stations serving predominantly
poor communities(placement)
% of slum areawithin 5 km of an urban rail station
(coverage)
Design
% of urban rail stations with signage and access
for people with disabilities
Output Indicators
(Produced / Delivered)
Component
#of rail cars for women
Participation
% of construction jobs held by poor laborers
Outcome Indicators
(Direct Beneficiaries / Users)
Ex. Passengers, drivers, owners of vehicles
and/or goods transported
Measuring sustained use:
Takes care of access and affordability
Access often used as proxy measurement of use,
but can be at output level
Measuring who is using:
Number and percentage who belong to included
groups
Impact Indicators
(Direct and Indirect Beneficiaries)
Direct beneficiaries: Secondary Effects
Ex. Passengers, drivers, owners of goods
transported : Level of income increases
Indirect beneficiaries: Primary Effects
Ex. Factory Workers: Level of employment of poor
worker increases
Ex. Farm Workers: Level of employment of
indigenouspeople on farms increases
Data Collection
Inclusive dimensions of indicators may not be
included in existing M&E systems
Poverty and social analysis can provide the
baseline data
Provision has to be made for ongoing data
collection particularly outcome
Review
Inclusion as part of strategic intent, not after-
thought
Inclusion in DMF mostly with outcome and
impact indicators
Proper formulation of indicators
Inclusion as standalone indicator or
component
Investigate data collection and determine
baseline
Thank You!
Questions? Comments?
bwoods@adb.org

You might also like