This presentation was delivered by Bernard Woods (Principal Results Management Specialist, ADB) on 12 September 2014, third day of the Designing Socially Inclusive Transport Projects Training, a pre-Transport Forum event.
Original Title
DSIT_Results-Based Planning and Monitoring for Inclusive Design in Transport
This presentation was delivered by Bernard Woods (Principal Results Management Specialist, ADB) on 12 September 2014, third day of the Designing Socially Inclusive Transport Projects Training, a pre-Transport Forum event.
This presentation was delivered by Bernard Woods (Principal Results Management Specialist, ADB) on 12 September 2014, third day of the Designing Socially Inclusive Transport Projects Training, a pre-Transport Forum event.
Transport September 12, 2014 Bernard Woods SPD/SPRU Agenda 1. Inclusive design 2. Results chain 3. Who is missing / not benefitting? 4. Inclusion in the DMF 5. Indicators Strategic Intent vs. Measurement Strategic intent is at the core of your design Results framework translates your strategic intent into a results chain Indicators measure achievement of strategic intent If inclusion is not part of your strategic intent, just having indicators will not bring inclusiveness Results Chain Simple Rule Produced Delivered Used by Beneficiary Benefit of Use Output Outcome Impact People Design Transport Output Outcome Impact Produced Delivered Used by Beneficiary Benefit of Use Roads built/ upgraded People / goods travel from A to B Income, education, health, etc Transport what do we measure? Output Outcome Impact Produced Delivered Used by Beneficiary Benefit of Use Km of roads built/ upgraded Average daily passengers, freight cost Mortality rate, Household income, graduation rate Who is Missing? Who is not using? Who is not benefitting from use? Airstrips built Faster, affordable travel Increased income Inclusiveness: Project Level Benefits / Beneficiaries Whose income is increasing? Who is travelling? Who can access? Output Outcome Impact Who is missing not using? Who do we miss by counting average daily passengers? What can you say about these users? Transport -What we need to do at the design stage? Look at the needs of different user groups What do women need in terms of safety? Look at the barriers to use How do differently abled people access the system? Look at how different groups use the outputs differently Where do poorer people live? Where do they need to go? Design and Monitoring Framework Design Summary Performance Targets and Indicators with Baselines Impact 1 statement Multiple indicators Outcome 1 statement Multiple indicators Outputs multiple statements Multiple indicators I nclusion Measurement of Inclusion Deconstructing Indicators Indicator Options Number of People travelingfrom farm to market centers increases to 5,000/yrby 2018 (2013 Baseline: 2,000/yr) Result (Change we want) Indicator (How we will count it) Targets& Baselines (How much increase fromwhere we are now, by when) I nclusion What should we measure People Travelling? Who is travelling? Sex Age Income group Differently abled Marginalized group identity Location ? How can we measure inclusion People Travelling? Number of People travelingfrom farm to market centers increases to 5,000/yrby 2018 (2013 Baseline: 2,000/yr) Number of Poor/female/indigenouspeople travelingfrom farm to market centers increases to 5,000/yrby 2018 2 Indicator Options for included group(s) Inclusive result Transport costs for poor women reduced 1. Standalone indicator- #of poor women with reduced transport costs 2. Component of indicator- #of women with reduced transport costs, of which half are poor Disaggregated data- #(M/F) of people with reduced transport costs[no poor, no female target] When counting people alwayssex-disaggregate Output, Outcome and Impact Indicators Output Indicators (Produced / Delivered) Spatial Location % of urban rail stations serving predominantly poor communities(placement) % of slum areawithin 5 km of an urban rail station (coverage) Design % of urban rail stations with signage and access for people with disabilities Output Indicators (Produced / Delivered) Component #of rail cars for women Participation % of construction jobs held by poor laborers Outcome Indicators (Direct Beneficiaries / Users) Ex. Passengers, drivers, owners of vehicles and/or goods transported Measuring sustained use: Takes care of access and affordability Access often used as proxy measurement of use, but can be at output level Measuring who is using: Number and percentage who belong to included groups Impact Indicators (Direct and Indirect Beneficiaries) Direct beneficiaries: Secondary Effects Ex. Passengers, drivers, owners of goods transported : Level of income increases Indirect beneficiaries: Primary Effects Ex. Factory Workers: Level of employment of poor worker increases Ex. Farm Workers: Level of employment of indigenouspeople on farms increases Data Collection Inclusive dimensions of indicators may not be included in existing M&E systems Poverty and social analysis can provide the baseline data Provision has to be made for ongoing data collection particularly outcome Review Inclusion as part of strategic intent, not after- thought Inclusion in DMF mostly with outcome and impact indicators Proper formulation of indicators Inclusion as standalone indicator or component Investigate data collection and determine baseline Thank You! Questions? Comments? bwoods@adb.org