Thomas John Lawler

4002 Hwy 78, Suite 530-321

Snellville, GA 30039
USA
Fax: 770-469-6279
U.S. SECURI TI ES AND EXCHANGE
Plaintiff
vs.
THOMAS J. LAWLER and
FREEDOM FOUNDATION USA L L C
dba FREEDOM CLUB USA
Defendants
DIVINE SPIRIT L L C,
ORDER PROCESSING L L C ,
PROSPERI TY SOLUTIONS L L C, and
VI OLET BLESSINGS L L C
Relief Defendants
F I L E D IN C L E R K ' S OFFICE
U.S.D.C. AUanta
OCT I 0 2011
^JAMES N. HATTEN, Clerk
Civil Action File No.
l:14-CV-2468-AT
STATEMENT FOR DISMISSAL WI TH PREJUDI CE
Parties
1. Defendant: Thomas John Lawler, manager of the following LLCs residing
in the United States of America, FREEDOM FOUNDATION USA LLC dba FREEDOM
CLUB USA, registered i n the state of Nevada, the United States of America, VIOLET
BLESSINGS LLC, ORDER PROCESSING LLC and DIVINE SPIRIT LLC, each registered
in the state of Missouri, the United States of America.
1
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 10
JUDICIAL NOTI CE
3. Defendant(s) claim all rights at all times and waive none of them at any time
for any cause or reason.
4. Defendant (s) claim substantial Due Process rights to have Findings of Facts
and Conclusions of Law published with any order ofthis court.
5. Defendant (s) reserve the right to supplement and/or amend this Statement as
needed, due to anticipated foreseeable harmful actions against Defendant(s) during the course
of what is being called an "investigation" but in reality is nothing short of a witch hunt.
GENERAL BACKGROUND
6. The Defendant(s) institute this action for dismissal of this claim against
Defendant(s) for serious crimes perpetrated against Defendant(s) including multiple
violations of economic crimes and other crimes against humanity, of which the Plaintiff is a
part, and for terrorism upon which relief as detailed herein, must be granted.
BACKGROUND. FACTUAL ALLEGATI ONS AND BRI EF IN SUPPORT
7. This matter is multi-faceted based on an active legal action filed against
Defendant(s) and wi l l be detailed herein to give understanding and clarity as to the basis for this
abuse and the depth of misuse and bastardized interpretation of law, resulting in bringing great
harm upon the very people they state they are protecting. This claim arises from certain vicious
and harmful allegations on the part of Plaintiff, which include but are not limited to,
UNREGISTERED OFFERING OF SECURITIES and FRAUD as published in an active
"investigation", and an ensuing lawsuit filed against Defendant(s) of which the Plaintiff plays a
complicit role, as well as other unnecessary and harmfiil actions on the part of the Plaintiff
against of which Defendant(s) Thomas John Lawler and Diane Jean Lawler representing the true
Beneficiaries, of the corporate colorable Limited Liability Companies, all of which Defendant(s)
Thomas John Lawler and Diane Jean Lawler represent and who are being harmed. Said actions
are baseless and void of any substantive fact or good cause.
2
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 2 of 10
8. For 10 years, Defendant, Thomas John Lawler has successfully operated its
company FREEDOM FOUNDATION LLC (FFUSA) in all 50 states. It has designed a simple
administrative procedure utilizing the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) whereby member
participants are provided a remedy to be compensated for fraudulent bank loans and IRS
payments. Since the US bankruptcy of 1933 and the extraction of Gold and Silver from the
people, "real money" was replaced with "fiat money" through HJR192 by FDR.
9. To support these fiat dollars, each individual's birth certificate was pledged as
value to the world cestui que trust providing each individual a CAPITALIZED NAME, as their
beneficiary name. Thus, when borrowing from a Federal Reserve Bank, the alleged borrower's
signature on the promissory note is the banks authorization through the FED to exchange the
note for the trust "money" giving the illusion the bank had loaned their own hands. This is the
basis for the notarial protest process.
10. Additionally, the IRS came into existence to collect the interest on the borrowed
"fiat" money by the US govemment by the FED. Since it is unconstitutional to tax income on
wages since it is not an apportioned tax, the IRS "codes" each filer's master file and creates an
offshore address for them (often Puerto Rico) and changes the filers occupation to ATF sales
(Alcohol, Tobacco or Firearms) which is a taxable offshore occupation. This is the basis for the
IRS notarial protest process.
11. The process utilizes a notary who certifies that each of three notices has been sent
to the respective bank or IRS. These notices detail typically thirty plus offenses committed by the
bank or IRS in their loan creation and collection schemes. Each notice contains a claim amount
based on the amount of monies paid to the institution: for banks principle and interest paid; for
the IRS taxes and fines paid. The notary fiirther certifies i f any responses are returned with viable
defenses of the challenges presented to them on a point by point basis. To date, no bank or IRS
response has properly refuted a single item nor the penalty assessment for compensatory and
punitive damages. Since an unreftited notice stands as truth, the notary, under the UCC rules
administers a notarial protest creating a default judgment for the amount stated in the notice.
12. Since the corporate US Govemment is still i n chapter 11 bankruptcy, the
judgment's claim is then submitted to the US Treasury with supporting documentation for
3
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 3 of 10
payment under the bankruptcy. This entire process of the notarial protest and subsequent
payment is referred to in this document as an Administrative Remedy (AR).
13. It has taken FREEDOM FOUNDATION USA LLC (FFUSA) 9 of these 10 years
to discover the pathway to pay these claims and has been mailing and faxing the US Treasury
Secretary Jack Lew and President Barack Obama repeatedly this last year. Do to the
bureaucracy of the govemmental system, it took support fi-om IMF head Christine Legarde, UN
Secretary-General, Ban Ki-Moon and US UN Ambassador, Samantha Power to finally reach the
White House to present our winning proposal for Americans. We further understand this has
been submitted to the Intemational Common Law World Court for review and approval by the
White House.
14. During this developmental period with the White House and the US Treasury, two
unfortunate events occurred. First, evidence points to a disgrantled contractor with a 9 year
history with FFUSA who was bound by her agreement rules to handle disputes through
Arbitration, sought out the SEC in Afianta, GA with a sordid tale of untmths and allegations.
Around this same period, as part of the due dihgence regarding our US Treasury submission for
claim payment by FFUSA, we understand the US Treasury contacted a neutral agency to fiirther
contact the Atlanta SEC for a routine due diligence on the FFUSA operation. It is apparent the
SEC (Plaintiff) mistook the casual inquiry as a negative and added the ranting of the disgrantied
contractor and perhaps a few others to create a witch hunt.
15. The conditions of any member using the FFUSA AR service by contract is there
are "no refunds" and the process is done on a "best efforts" basis. This is further affirmed on
every member order that they agree. The award for each claim can vary by member currently
between $325,000 and $1,000,000 with service prices ranging from $1000 to $10,000. Services
for early members varied as to the service price and award level over the years, but the process
mechanics were consistent as described above.
16. The Plaintiff, in their overzealous manner took the stories of mismanagement at
face value without even one notice or opportunity to validate or dispute any of it by FFUSA until
Thomas John Lawler and Diane Jean Lawler were subpoenaed on short notice on or about
6/20/14 and deferred to appear on 6/25/14 with the Plaintiff refiising to provide even one word
on the issue at hand or who said what. This has continued to this day. The "investigation"
4
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 4 of 10
involved every bank account managed by Defendants with strong inferences of misuse or theft of
ftinds. The disgruntled contractor's bank account was also present. No other information was
sought.
17. On July 3 Thomas John Lawler received a phone message from the Plaintiff, Pat
Huddleston advising the SEC wi l l be bringing smt against Thomas John Lawler and all
Defendant LLCs and was given 3 minutes to prepare for a phone conference with Judge Amy
Totenberg and himself. The phone conference ensued with no opportunity to read the lawsuit
nor did it appear Judge Amy Totenberg had done so. Pat Huddleston announced many of the
charges insinuating the administrative process constituted selling a security and the lack of
fiinding (by the US Treasury) constituted fraud then moved to freeze all bank accounts of
Thomas John Lawler and Diane Jean Lawler. Thomas John Lawler contested this action sighting
every book writer or seller of a "how to book" would be selling securities with such a broad
definition. Judge Amy Totenberg sided with the railroading of the Defendants and signed the
TRO freezing all FFUSA and related accounts and most of Violet Blessings LLC, managed by
Diane Jean Lawler. Additionally, Judge Amy Totenberg ordered the stopping of all AR
administration setting a hearing date of August 8, 2014 for a fiill hearing.
SUMMARY
18. Plaintiff repeatedly and wrongfully accused Defendant(s) of engaging in
unregistered offering of securities and fraud, along with quoting standardized rhetoric of "the
Securities Act", which has no application or basis i n the matter at hand since the offering
Defendant(s) refer to is no more than a simple contract for service and educational process, with
NO promise of resuhs other than a best efforts administrative performance. Much like that of any
service provider, there surely is a cost for service performed which may or may not be based on
the sum total and/or work performed. For example, a collection agency may be paid to collect or
negotiate a sum certain on behalf of another, and whose fee for service may be charged or
deducted and may be based on the collectable amount. Would this contract for service be akin to
an "investment" or "security"? We think not. The collector simply performs a service but does
not promise or guarantee results. Nonetheless, the service provider is still paid for their service.
The Defendant(s) are in that category as a service provider.
5
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 5 of 10
19. So as not to restate a large part or all of the action filed by Plaintiff in the UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA
DIVISION, we state the true facts and authorities as they apply to these contracts and processes
in question: The Contracts are MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENTS NOT INVESTOR
AGREEMENTS. They include various terms and conditions and CLUB benefits. One benefit is
the ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY referred to as AR (this being the portion apparently being
misconstrued as the "investment'V'security" part and "fraud"). The AR is an educational process
and fee for service with no promise of resuhs or efficacy. A CLUB MEMBER (NOT
INVESTOR) may choose to engage and in doing so they themselves must provide all true and
correct information, including any amount of monetary remedy they deem as due. Defendant(s)
merely provide administrative services that include, and are not limited to, the well known, long
standing, well defined and lawftiUy utilized, NOTARIAL PROTEST process. NOTARIAL
PROTEST, as defined i n BLACK' S LAW DICTIONARY FIRST EDITION:
"PROTEST. 2. A notarial act, being a formal statement
in writing made by a notary under his seal of office, at
the request of the holder of a bi l l or note, in which such
bi l l or note is described, and it is declared that the same
was on a certain day presented for payment, (or
acceptance, as the case may be,) and that such payment
or acceptance was refused, and stating the reasons, i f
any, given for such refiisal, whereupon the notary
protests against all parties to such instrument, and
declares that they wi l l be held responsible for all loss or
damage arising from its dishonor."
20. Since the definitions of "Investment" and "Security" are so broad, the authorities
utilize these phrases/law as a catch-all whenever convenient, as well as the widely used "Howey
Test", as they used in this matter, again, as a standardized catch-all. The "Howey Test" does not
apply as the contracts in question do not meet at least 3 of the 4 prongs of the test: There is no 1)
investment money, 2) due to an expectation of profits, since there are none, 3) there is a common
enterprise obligated to cure the judgments processed, which is the United States Department of
Treasury and 4) does NOT depend solely on the efforts of a third party but on individual
education, the accuracy of information provided for administration by each individual engaging
in the process based on same, and The United States Department of Treasury and what they
deem is just and proper in each individual instance.
6
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 6 of 10
21. In addition, the services and educational process in question, as well as other
CLUB BENEFITS, are available ONLY to CLUB MEMBERS and NOT offered or available to
the general public. One must choose to become a CLUB MEMBER (NOT INVESTOR) in order
to take advantage of any CLUB BENEFITS of their choosing. The CLUB does not offer or
engage in investments or securities.
22. These frozen assets are essential for staff payroll, commissions, rent, phone,
websites, ISPs, etc. to carry on the many other aspects of our business. FFUSA is an operation
of 10,000 memberships encompassing about 20,000 people. We need to continue to service
them and complete the fmal fiinding bringing trillions of dollars to a severely struggling
economy. FFUSA's hands have been severely and unconscionably tied by this TRO and suit.
23. This TRO and Civil Action No. l:14-CV-2468-AT i n the UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
must be terminated IMMEDIATELY with prejudice.
24. A Papal APOSTOLIC LETTER was issued MOTU PROPRIO, by the Supreme
Pontiff Francis, on My 11, 2013, effective September 1, 2013. APOSTOLIC LETTER declared
the need "for the international community to adopt adequate legal instruments to prevent and
counter criminal activities, by promoting international judicial cooperation on criminal
matters". The criminality of crimes against humanity and terrorism cannot be disputed
(EXHIBIT A)
25. Plaintiff is being noticed, on the record, of the seriousness of their actions and the
harm being perpetrated on the very people they purportedly wish to protect and of the revocation
of their pubhc servant immunities. Said revocation of immunities places each public servant
personally liable for their own individual and collective actions or lack thereof, and the ensuing
action and penalties for their continued disregard of waming.
26. To date, to the best of my knowledge, Plaintiff have failed to resolve this matter
and Defendant(s) have not been made whole requiring immediate and complete settlement and
dismissal of this matter. Plaintiff continues to inflict great harm upon Defendant(s) rendering
them unable to conduct business individually and severally by and through Plaintiff(s) TRO and
asset freeze of bank accounts, Limited Liability Companies, as well as causing irrevocable harm
7
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 7 of 10
by way of defamation of character and slanderous, false allegations results of which may never
be erased.
(ECONOMIC AND OTHER CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY).
PURSUANT TO PAPAL APOSTOLIC LETTER EFFECTI VE 1. SEPTEMBER 2013
ISSUED MOTU
27. The APOSTOLIC LETTER issued 11, July 2013 and effective as of 1, September
2013 clearly puts forth the means to prevent and counter criminal activities that threaten human
dignity and the common good and peace, including but not limited to, economic crimes and other
crimes against humanity as well as terrorism. In addition, it strips away immunities that pubhc
servants have long hid behind and now makes them personally liable for their own personal and
collective actions or lack thereof.
28. Crimes Against Humanity is well defmed on an intemational level. Intemational
legal precedent is very well established by and through previous legal actions and ralings too
numerous to count. As an example, one may look to other intemational courts such as the
Intemational Criminal Court (ICC) which was established as a permanent tribunal (among many
other intemational courts and tribunals) to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against
humanity, war crimes and other crimes.
29. As a direct result of Plaintiff s actions, Defendant(s) have been subject to financial
devastation, cessation of ability to administiatively assist in curing valid outstanding judgments
(thereby harming thousands of people) and effectively mining the excellent reputation, some
very long standing, of Defendant(s). Defendant(s) are responsible for creating serious economic
and mental anguish and harm.
(TERRORISM)
PURSUANT TO PAPAL APOSTOLIC L E T T E R EFFECTI VE 1. SEPTEMBER 2013
ISSUED MOTU PROPRIO
30. The APOSTOLIC LETTER issued 11, July 2013 and effective as of 1, September
2013 clearly puts forth the means to prevent and counter criminal activities that threaten human
dignity and the common good and peace, including but not limited to, economic and other crimes
8
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 8 of 10
against humanity as well as terrorism. In addition, it strips away immunities that public servants
have long hid behind and now makes them personally liable for their own personal and collective
actions or lack thereof
31. Since 1994, the United Nations General Assembly has repeatedly condemned
terrorist acts using the following political description of terrorism:
"Criminal acts intended or calculated to provoke a state of terror in the general
public, a group of persons or particular persons for pohtical purposes are in any
circumstance unjustifiable, whatever the considerations of a political,
philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or any other nature that may
be invoked to justify them."
32. As a direct resuh of Plaintiff actions, Defendant(s) are subject to severe loss of
business and other damages, and has suffered serious financial and mental anguish and harm.
RE L I E F
As a result of Plaintiff s actions. Defendant seeks the following relief:
3 3. An order for dismissal with prejudice.
34. An order for immediate release of all frozen funds.
35. An order for compensatory and punitive damages of $100,000.
36. An order for immediate publication of error and admission of same in the court and
published in the public record by way of local and national media.
37. Court fees and any and all costs of this action against the Defendants; and,
3 8. Any other relief the court deems just and proper.
Dated this ' f ' day of August, 2014.
Isl Thomas J Lawler
9
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 9 of 10
iDefinitions: (as d e f i n e d i n other i n t e r n a t i o n a l c o u r t s , not
n e c e s s a r i l y common law c o u r t s , but to demonstrate the use as a
worldwide standard).
Crimes A g a i n s t Humanity - "Crimes a g a i n s t humanity" i n c l u d e any o f
t h e f o l l o w i n g a c t s committed as p a r t o f a widespread or s y s t e m a t i c
a t t a c k d i r e c t e d a g a i n s t any c i v i l i a n p o p u l a t i o n , w i t h knowledge o f
t h e a t t a c k :
murder;
e x t e r m i n a t i o n ;
enslavement;
d e p o r t a t i o n or f o r c i b l e t r a n s f e r o f p o p u l a t i o n ;
imprisonment;
t o r t u r e ;
r a p e , s e x u a l s l a v e r y , e n f o r c e d p r o s t i t u t i o n , f o r c e d pregnancy,
e n f o r c e d s t e r i l i z a t i o n , o r any o t h e r f o r m o f s e x u a l v i o l e n c e
o f comparable g r a v i t y ;
p e r s e c u t i o n a g a i n s t an i d e n t i f i a b l e group on p o l i t i c a l ,
r a c i a l , n a t i o n a l , e t h n i c , c u l t u r a l , r e l i g i o u s or gender
grounds;
e n f o r c e d disappearance o f persons;
t h e crime o f a p a r t h e i d ;
other inhumane a c t s of a s i m i l a r c h a r a c t e r i n t e n t i o n a l l y
c a u s i n g g r e a t s u f f e r i n g or s e r i o u s b o d i l y or mental i n j u r y .
T e r r o r i s m - The i n t e r n a t i o n a l community has been slow t o f o r m u l a t e a
u n i v e r s a l l y agreed, l e g a l l y b i n d i n g d e f i n i t i o n o f t h i s c r i m e . These
d i f f i c u l t i e s a r i s e f r o m t h e f a c t t h a t t h e t e r m " t e r r o r i s m " i s
p o l i t i c a l l y and e m o t i o n a l l y charged.
Since 1994, t h e U n i t e d N a t i o n s General Assembly has r e p e a t e d l y
condemned t e r r o r i s t a c t s u s i n g t h e f o l l o w i n g p o l i t i c a l d e s c r i p t i o n
o f t e r r o r i s m :
" C r i m i n a l a c t s i n t e n d e d o r c a l c u l a t e d t o provoke a s t a t e
o f t e r r o r i n t h e g e n e r a l p u b l i c , a group o f persons or
p a r t i c u l a r persons f o r p o l i t i c a l purposes are i n any
c i r c u m s t a n c e u n j u s t i f i a b l e , whatever t h e c o n s i d e r a t i o n s o f
a p o l i t i c a l , p h i l o s o p h i c a l , i d e o l o g i c a l , r a c i a l , e t h n i c ,
r e l i g i o u s o r any o t h e r n a t u r e t h a t may be i n v o k e d t o
j u s t i f y them."
We l o o k t o t h e Common Law I n t e r n a t i o n a l World Court t o broaden t h e
e x i s t i n g vague d e f i n i t i o n o f " t e r r o r i s m " t o i n c l u d e " f i n a n c i a l
t e r r o r i s m . "
2 DEFENDANT(S): (Known D e f e n d a n t ( s ) as l i s t e d i n p a r a g r a p h 2.
h e r e i n )
10
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 10 of 10