Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.
.
7_
.
REFERENCES
Wilson, Mark R., "An Introduction to High Speed Aircraft Noise Prediction," NASA
CR- 189582, 1992.
Ginian, Ronnie E., Brown, Christine G., Bartlett, Robert W., and Baucom, Patricia
I-L, "ANOPP Programmer's Reference Manual for the Executive System," NASA
TMX-74029, 1977.
Zonmaski, William E., and Weir, Donald S., "Aircraft Noise Prediction Program
Theoretical Manual Propeller Aerodynamics and Noise," Part 3, NASA TM -
83199, 1986
Nguyen, L. Cathy, "The NASA Aircraft Noise Prediction Program Improved
Propeller Analysis System," CR - 4394, 1991.
Gillian, Ronnie E., "Aircraft Noise Prediction Program User's Manual," NASA TM-
84486, 1983.
Zorumski, William E., "Aircraft Noise Prediction Program Theoretical Manual,"
Parts 1 &2. NASA TM-83199, 1981.
Nolan, Sandra K., "Aircraft Noise Prediction Program Propeller Analysis System
IBM-PC Version User's Manual," Version 2.0, CR 181689, 1988.
Dobrzynski, Werner M., Heller, Harm, H., Powers, John O., and Densmore, James
E., "DFVLR/FAA Propeller Noise Test in the German-Dutch Wind Tunnel DNW,"
Executive Data Report No. AEE 86-3, 1986.
62
AppendixA. Summaryof FunctionalModules
Module
Name
ABS
ATM
BLM
EFF
GEO
IBA
IBL
IBS
LEV
PLD
PRO
Module
"rifle
Atmospheric
Absorption Module
Atmospheric
Module
Boundary Layer
Module
Effective Noise
Module
Geometr 7 Module
Improved Blade
Aerodynamics
Module
Improved Boundary
Layer Module
Improved Blade
Shape Module
Noise Levels
Module
Propeller Loading
Module
Propagation Module
PRP Propeller
Performance Module
PRT
FI'E
RBA
RBS
SFO
SPN
TPN
Tone Propagation
Module
Propeller Trailing
Edge Noise
Module
Blade Aerodynamics
Module
Blade Shape Module
Steady Flyover
Module
Subsonic Propeller
Noise Module
Transonic Propeller
Noise Module
Brief
Description
Computes absorption coefficient as a function of
altitude & frequency usin_ ANSI or SAE method
Computes atmospheric properties as a function of
altitude using hydrostatic method
Computes skin friction, drag coefficients, and
boundary layer thickness at trailing edge using the
inte_g'al formulations
Computes the Effective Perceived Noise Levels
Calculates source-to-observer _eometr_
Same as RBA with addition of Glauert
compressibility correction and increased number of
Fourier series terms
Same as BLM with additional zero pressure
gradient flat plate model for the computation of the
boundary layer thickness
Same as RBS with more concise input blade
_eometry and produces additional output tables
Computes OASPL, A-weighted SPL, D-weighted
SPL, PNL, and/or PNLT
Calculates loads at specified surface points and
times
Transfers broad-band noise data from the source
frame of reference to the observer fl'ame of
reference
Computes induced velocity field, thrust, torque,
and efficiency under specified opemtin_ conditions
Transfers tone noise data from the source frame of
reference to the observer frame of reference
Predicts broad-band and harmonic noise due to the
interaction of the blade turbulent boundary layer
with the trailin_ edge
Computes pressure forces on the upper and lower
surfaces for specified angle-of-attack and Mach
numbers
Formulates a functional representation of the blade
surface suitable for aerodynamic and aeroacoustic
calculations
Provides flight dynamics data for a steady flyover
Calculates periodic acoustic pressure signature and
spectrum with subsonic tip speed
Calculates periodic acoustic pressure signature and
spectrum with transonic tip speed
63
AppendixB. - TABLE Control Statement Discussion
The TABLE control statement builds an ANOPP data table which can be used as
input to the following functional modules. What follows is a brief description of the
elements of a table control statement and how these elements fit together to form a usable
ANOPP table. For more detailed information refer to Section 3.7.3 of reference 2.
Fo_at: Type 1 Tables (only type currently available).
A table is generally has the following format:
TABLE UNIT(MEMBER) 1 SOURCE=* $
INT=0,1,2
IND l=RS,n 1,2,2, independent variable values separated by commas or blanks
IND2=RS,n2,2,2, independent variable values separated by commas or blanks
IND3=RS,n3,2,2, independent variable values separated by commas or blanks
IND4=RS,n4,2,2, independent variable values separated by commas or blanks
DEP=RS, dependent variable values separated by commas or blanks
END* $
The first word of the first line is TABLE following the data unit member names.
Number 1 shows that type one table is currently available. SOURCE= specifies where the
data is located from which the table will be built. The * indicates that the data will
immediately follow the TABLE control statement. As with any ANOPP control statement,
this line must end with a dollar sign symbol ($).
The line beginning with INT determines which interpolation procedures will be
permitted in this table. A 0 indicates no interpolation, a 1 indicates linear interpolation, and
a 2 indicates cubic-spline interpolation.
The next four lines define the independent variables (IND). The maximum for the
independent variable types is four. Each of the independent variable cards has the
following descriptions:
RS : real single precision
The first number is the number of independent variables in that line
The second integer number is the interpolation code for the extrapolation
procedure to be used if the specified value for this independent variable falls
beyond the last table value for the independent variable.
64
Thethirdintegernumberis theinterpolationcodefor theextrapolation
proceduretobeusedif thespecifiedvaluefor thisindependent variablefalls
beforethe first table valuefor the independent variable.
These interpolation codes are
- 0 no extrapolation allowed
- 1 use table value of the independent variable closest to the specified value
- 2 extrapolation is linear when using the first two table values.
The next numbers are the independent variables in amending or descending order.
Multiple dependent variables can be assigned in one ANOPP table structure. To
implement a multiple dependent variable table, the ordered position format code is used on
an additional independent variable card IND. The additional dependent variables are added
to the dependent variable list. In the following example, a drag coefficient table will be
added to the lift coefficient table described above.
TABLE BLM (L IFTDRAG)
INT = 1
INDI = RS 1 1
IND2 = RS 9 1
1 SOURCE =* $
1 0.
1 -16.0 -12.0 -8.0 -4.0
4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0
IND3 = RS 4 1 1 0. 0.25 0.55 0.85
IND4 = 0 2 0 0
DEP = RS
-I. 6 -1.2 -0.8 -0.4 0. 0.4 0.8
-1.6 -1.24 -0.83 -0.41 0. 0.41 0.83
-1.6 -1.44 -0.96 -0.48 0. 0.48 0.96
-1.6 -1.6 -1.52 -0.76 0. 0.76 1.52
0.017 0.012 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.007 0.009
0.017 0.012 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.007 0.009
0.017 0.012 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.007 0.009
0.017 0.012 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.007 0.009
END* $
0
1.2 1.6
1.24 1.6
1.44 1.6
1.6 1.6
0.012 0.017
0.012 0.017
0.012 0.017
0.012 0.017
In this example, BLM is the data unit and LIFTDRAG is the table member. The
table member name must be enclosed in parentheses. The number 1 following the data
unit/table member definition indicates that this will be a type-1 data table. Type-1 data
tables are the only type of data tables supported by ANOPP at this time. The next line
beginning with INT determines which interpolation procedure will be used in the table. In
this example, linear interpolation will be permitted on this data table. The lift and drag
coefficients of a particular propeller are a function of spanwise station (IND1), angle-of-
attack (IND2), and Mach number (IND3). IND4 shows that there are 2 ordered positions.
This table consists of two dependent variables as a function of three independent variables.
65
TheIND 1 line defines the spanwise station. The character following the IND 1=
indicates the data-type code for the spanwise station. A value of RS means the values will
be real single precision. The next value in this line determines the number of independent
variables in this line. There is one value of the spanwise station.
The IND2 is the same as IND 1. There are 9 values of the angle-of-attack. The
number which follows isan integercode which definesthe extrapolationprocedure to be
used ifa specifiedvalue for the angle-of-attack fallsbeyond the lasttablevalue for the
independentvariable. A value of 1 indicatesthatthe independent variabletablevalue
closestto the specifiedvalue willbe used. The purpose of the next number is similarto
that of the previous number in that it is an integer code for the extrapolation procedure to be
used if a specified value for the angle-of-attack falls before the first table value for the
independent variable. The next value of 1, in this case, indicates that the extrapolation is to
be linear using the first two table values for the independent variable. Following these two
integer codes are the nine values of the independent variable, angle-of-attack. IND3 has 4
Mach number values associated with it.
Ordered position has been indicated on the IND4 line by using a 0 for the format
data-type code. The next value, 2, indicates there are two dependent variables in this table.
The extrapolation procedure values are irrelevant in this line so they have been given values
of 0. From examining the dependent data, the lift coefficients are listed fast followed by
the drag coefficients.
After all of the independent variables have been defined, the dependent variable is
defined following the symbol DEP. As with the independent variable definitions, the
character following the DEP symbol is a format data-type code. Once again, RS indicates
the values of the lift coefficient are to be read in as real single precision numbers.
Following this character are the values of the dependent variable.
It is important to place the dependent variables in the correct order when working
with more than one independent variable. In this example, ANOPP will read the order
position (IND4) first, Mach number (IND3) second, angle-of-attack (IN'D2) third, and
spanwise station (IND 1) fourth. If the "do loop" is used to visualize the order of the three
independent variables, then the most inner do-loop is IND 1, the next one is IND2, and the
most outer one is IND3. Because of the presence of 0 in IND4 card and the number two
after 0 shows that there are two ordered positions, this can become the most outer do-loop
for the lift coefficients and drag coefficients.
The END* symbol is the input terminator card which signifies the end of a table
input section. This is also a control statement which requires a dollar sign ($) at the end of
the line. The statements between the line beginning with TABLE and the line beginning
66
with END* are table description cards, not control statements, therefore, they do not
require dollar sign symbols ($) at the end of each line.
67
Z
,F,,4
611
rs_
@13o--1
@Fa
NO
NO _ YES
Figure 2.
0"
"
o
77
Starboard propeUer
"__ _25 ft
Fus,
Port pro_
-%
Starboard propeller
lage
Fig. 12 Geometries of the case studies
78
Flow
I
MP 8 - 30* Upward out of plane
MP 9 - 30* Downward out of plane
"_1 MP2 ,lfMP4
v
;./-_0 _
\15,1 1-_/.5_
\_!Id / _ Propeller
Fig. 14 Microphone position relative to propeller in the DNW experiment.
80
120 ......................
CN-3 i
L
110 ';-
10o
k o
9OP
E
80
L
7o
60 i ,
O
O
o
a= o MP2 2
d
-i
o J
J
120
110
100
90:
8O
7O
60 A_
I I ; I I I I ; t 1 I I ; I I I I _ I
CN-3
a = 0 MP 4
)
I PAS
O DNW
O
0 0
' t ' I I I L : t I I I ,
120_ .................. -_-_-=
q
ct = -3.6 FN-4
110 _ MP2
_- P
aa 100 ":-
> b
90
O'1
[
"_ 80
O
7O
60
O
O
-q
-I
4
--4
O
-I
o
d
o q
5
-4,'
I _ I L 1 t ; i 1 i i i I I ;
120 i ..... _-'-_-_'--_--_'-_---'--_--_-_--_--'--_-"
L
110 F-
F
100_ o
k
1-
90.:-
80)
L
70 _-.
60 I,
O
O
O
(x = -3.6 FN-4 _
MP 4 -4,'
!
7
4
o
, I I I ' I I [ i I I i I I I _
120
110
100
9O
80
7O
6O
I I I ; I I I I ; t z i r ; I I I i ;
a = 7.4 GN-4
MP 2
1
O
3
5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
120 r_--r ,---_-_--T- ..... _-,---_--_--_---_--,---_-_
k
110
L
loo
E
90_
i--i
80_
l--i
70_
6oi
= 7.4
GN-4
MP4 i
4
4
-M
: l I I i ', 1 r I I = I I ,
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number Harmonic number
Fig. 15 Comparison of PAS prediction with DNW data at MP2 and MP4 for the round tip propeller.
Q = 1800 RPM
81
120, ....................
,_ BN-4
110L
_.,-_)
U.
100L- '-'
b
F
9O_
g.
70
F
k
60 !.
O
O
Or= 0
MP2 -'
-q
)
(1)
-'-4
ll0L
@
I--I
_-I C)
100
9O
80-
70,-
*.--I
60 ""
120 _ .................... ..
(x = 0 BN-4
MP4
@ ,
I PAS -q
o o DNW ]
j
(
i o o 4
, I I i t I l ' a--_ _'*
120:, , , , , : , , , . , , _--_--_-_------_-_--
f --,
110
,._ _,
"_ 100 _ o
= 9O_
"
r--i
80.,
_t
70,-,
60-1
)
O
O
.--_
_'_ O
a = -3.6 FN- 1 -
MP2
--4
O
-4
o
i 1 i I i _ : i I_
120 ,--,- .-_--,--_--,-_ , , , , , _ , , ,-_--,---_-_
FN-I i
110
b
100
90_-
sol:
F
F
70 L
60 i ,
c_ = -3.6
MP4 __
4
0 -.
Q
@
4
t
q
lilll_ll!
120 ....................
110
100
90
8O
7O
60
ct = 7.4 GN- 1
MP2
O
O
9
I
O
O o
I
120.-_=-,--,--_--_ , , _ _ , , , _ , , , , , ,:
c_ = 7.4 GN-1 -_
110 _ MP4_
4
,:_ -i
100_ _
i 4
,_ i O 4
90L
i.-
F c_
L.
80_ _.
F 0
F
70 -
2
60 _ !
1 3 5 7 9 II 13 15 17 19 I 3 5 7 9 II 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number Harmonic number
]zig.16 Comparison ofpredictionwith DNW dataatMP 2 and MP 4 fortheround tippropeller.
= 2100 RPM
82
0 - ___ o
11o L
t
80
7O
o
_oo
()
o
Oo
o
o
MP 2
d
-4
d
o
o
120 ,:...................
r-
llOi- cG._
i--
L
100_
+_
90-
80 P-
k!
7o
60:;
(
(D
(P
c)
o
...4 I
__-0
o
o
(_1 ()
BN-5 +.
-i
MP4 :
-i
I PAS i
o DNW
o i
---4
IlTi
120 ................ -_--_-_:
:;_ +++
L
110 _o
I:I::1 i-+
_100_
= 90-
k--i
C_
t'u +_
O +.-+
70_
;-I
C.)
)oo
ct = -3.6
O
O
'-'O
I o
Ii
FN-2 i
MP2 2::
d
"1
---I
-]
o
o
Id
120 _-==--,--, .......
. a = -3.6
110 _ ,_"
-, @
+' (+1)
100_
_, O
,-.j
()
90_ O
+--I
80_
+--I
I-i
+.-I
70_
,-I
60
@
.J
FN-2 i
MP4
--.q,
.-1
O "
l,i -+
120
11o
lO0
9O
80
70
<.3
60 ! i
1
I I I ; 1 I I I ; ! I I I ; I I I t
= 7.4 GN-2
MP2
o
o
o 0
3 5
o
o
(DOoI) _
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
120 ; ......... - ........... :
x = 7.4 GN-2
MP 4 -
110_
-, _ )
+--I
100
,--I
,..-I
_-I
_-I
;-I
80 _4
LI
_-I
:--I
70-+
,--i
,--I
+--I
60 ''
1 3
o
Q
_a_ 0
o
@
o
I ) 0
t
d
-t
-]
-i
Q
1
5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
Fig. 17 Comparison of prediction with DNW data at MP 2 and MP4 for the round tip propeller.
f2 = 2400
83
120, .................... j
o BN-6 _
0_=0
,'_ 0000
110 _
F
L
100 :_
9oh
L
mF
F
70
L
60 _ ,
0
O00
O
OO
MP2 -,
I PAS
o DNW -
o o q
0 "1
O0 4
o4
!
4_
4
J
4
!
4
J
120 L.................... "
.,ki) O
110
lOO
b
90_
F
70
b
k
60 L_____ .........
Gt=O
0 0 0
0 0
BN-6
MP4
O O
r_o o c_
"4
120 .................... 120
r o o 3 a = -3.6 FN-3 "
110
o 100 :'-
90,':-
O
r/_ L
70 '_
F
60 i.
0
)OO
0 0 0,.,
"0
4
MP2 _i...'
q
4
00 0
0 -'
"I
4
!
"i
4
"-!
I
110
100
9O
8O
7O
60
0
C) 0
0 o
a = -3.6 FN-3 -,
ooo MP4 A
00 '0 -_
O00 ..,
f-)
120 ..........
110
100
9O
80
7O
60
0
0 o
,9
0
i i i ; i i i i
a = 7.4 ON-3
MP 2
O
(I)
Oo
O
(1)
(D_
120 ,T--_,--_-_-_--_ ........ _-_--_----_,
-i
,_ _ = 7.4 ON-3
110_Oo_, MP4
,--i _J O
"" 0 4
100_ o 4
'-' (DO0 .4
"
90 ..T., 0
:,.-_
_-i '0_
"-'
80 _ -_
4
I I i
I
, 60 rl _ i ,!
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number Harmonic number
Fig. 18 Comparison of prediction with data at MP2 and MP4 for the round tip propeller.
f_ = 2700
84
120, ....................
- 4
ct---3.6 FN-4 -_
MP6_
110 ._o
1001 o
9o o
80
7O
60_
LIII'JII[IIj. IL
120 .. .....................
__ a -- 7.4 GN-4
110 _- MP 6 _
100
90
8O
7O
60
I PAS
o DNW "
-q
--q
2
-4
120 _.....................
a = _3.6 FN-4
110_
_a 100
= 90
_ 80
O
70
60
O
O
O
4
2,,'
-!
-..q
o i
i I I t t L I i I I I ' I I i
120 L_' -' .... _--_---,--_-_--_-_=--_-_---,---=---_?_
110
k
100 '_
9O
80
7O
60
:
t
?
c_= 7.4
II_lllilll,iI
GN-4
4
,...-4
-i
120
110
100
90
80
7O
60
r i i I ; I i [ i ; i [ I i ; i i i I
ot = -3.6 FN-4
MP9
O
0 L,
_6_
q
-i
-.4
? i
'I_,
1'4) 1
120
110
100
9O
8O
l
t
7O
60
;Itl:llZill_tlll,ll;
@
"'[
i,
I
ct = 7.4
+
i
GN-2 i
MP 6 -,
I PAS -'
o DNW -'
120 :.,. ................... j
FN2 -
a = -3.6 - "
110_ _
100_
>
=90-
_ L
_ L
_== 80)
O t
r,_ L
70 ';-
v0
) .
fl)
(
q)
q)
(1)
{
MP8 S
-I
-4
......4
.4
tTti
120 _ ......
P
110 _
100-
90
80
7O
6O
a = 7.4
,
(
@
,
I
Ii,
II
GN-2
MP8
,q
--.4
J
)
lift,
,
J i , I
120 _ ...................
110 _-
v-
100,-
90,-
v-
v-
l=-
I--'
80_
FI
i-i
70_
1
,
FN-2
ct = -3.6 MP 9
;
q0
(1)
(D
, i i i J
1 , I , , )
5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
120
110
100
: I _ I ; _ I I : I ""l I _ r I I _ I'--T-{
. _x = 7.4 GN-2 -.:
<)L MP9
, -4
90 '
.q
I I
60 . ' _ , I I . . , ,q
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
Fig. 21 Comparison of prediction with DNW data at MP6, MP8 and M1x)
for the round tip propeller, fa = 2400 RPM
87
120, ............
L
110
F
100 F
F
g
9O,"-
L
70 F
6OL
)
0
f
0
ct = -3.6
O
03
..I_ o
4
MP6q
q
q
q
4
i
q
4
120 ................
110
100
90
8O
7O
6O
O
4
ct = 7.4 GN-3
q
MP6 -.
!
..
o I PAS ":
_) ._ o DNW -:.
i "_ -q
i o -
i (1) .2:
i
1
120 , ......... _--_--_ ',', , ,j
_ ct = -3.6 FN-3
110:,_ ,cD )o _c_ MP8 4
> 100-_ o -_
90-
t_
0,, :
0 __
_ L
70 _-
60 L
120 _,
,t_
110 _ :_,,
_..
100 ::-
80-
L
70 _-
P
b
F
60 _,
_t = 7.4 GN-3
MP8 q
"4
OM() i
i (D ._
4
I ,!
120
110
100
9O
8O
7O
60
i
[-I
_4
1
(D
o FN-3
o o MP9
(D (I)@
t
3 5 7
ct = -3.6
O
,a., (I) r-_
( _ ,q.,
I
I '
I
i
!!
I
I
(0
I
I
!
I
I
9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
120 [-_-----,--,-,
o
110 _
,-, )
e/%
100_
,..-i
90_
i--i
8oN
w-I
70-.
i
1 3 5
1 r : i i 1 _ i I--I' r I I :
ct = 7.4 GN-3 ___
-4
MP9 __
_)0o
0 -
i
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
Fig. 22 Comparison of prediction with DNW data at MP6, MP8 and MP9
for the round tip propeller. _ = 2700 RPM
88
120
110
100
9O
8O
7O
6O
.qq)
a = 0 CC-3 ._
MP2_
o
O
o
O
q
A
O -1..
O
, 1,9., ,, _,,,.,, _
120 :, ,
110 _-
k
100 i
90 -
8oj
i
70
i J
6o !
O
a=O
0
I PAS
o DNW
IL
o
CC-3
MP4 _
-4
--4
I I :
120 f., ...................
ct = 3.8 LC-4 -
110
_a 100_
90
r_
r_
-_ 80
70
60
o
o
O
O
illlTIIlilll
MP 2 2,,
-I
-I
4
I I :
L_
110
___
100 _ 0
90_
i-
80.::-
k
7O
O
o
c1 = 3.8
LC-4
MP4_
4
-1
"--I
4
_j
O
I
_l_lllilLi,i
I :
120
110
100
9O
8O
70
6O
I I I ; I I i I i 1 I I l _ t I I I
a = -7.3 EC-4
MP2
-o
o
O
o
1 3 5
o
o
o
o
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
120_ .......... _.., ,
L
_- (x = -7.3
110 _
100_ i
90 , o
i-
0
80 o
70 I o
C,
60 ] ] o , ,
1 3
EC-4 _
MP4 3
-4
-4
4
I _ I i I I i
5 7 9 l l 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
Fig. 23 Comparison of prediction with dataat MP2 and MP4 for the square tip propeller.
Q = 1800
89
a = 0 BC-4
MP2
110
7"
b--
o
9O
80-
L
b
70 !
1.
60 I ,
100
0
0
1
i
o
o
o
o
I
I
o
1
.4
-4
d
q
q
tililillJ
110 _ MP4 _.
bl
100 >
b
9OP
L
8O-
b-
70
k
6o_
p
Q o I PAS
o o DNW
I
i
!
o
o
o
o
Oo
.i
q
--4
"i
--i
3.8 Lc-1
110_
F
100 ::-
90-
b
7O
60-,
O
0
o
o
o
o
i
O
4
4
-4"
4
A
I i I I _ : I I i
120 r_=---_---_--_--'---_---r--_-_.--_--_--_---_-'-,--_--r--=--r--_
! a= 3.8 LC-1
L
MP4_
'0
o
i
1
I
i
i
i
J
o
o
o
I
o
o
110 [-
-t -,
1t30.--,
--I
90
80
70 _
q
4
d
-i
4
-q
d
I i I I i ' 1 I i
120 _ ................ -r--r--
c_ = -7.3 EC-1
MP2
110
100
90
80
7O
O
O
-I
1
6O
Q
O
f't
"_O
O
Q
0
Oo
O
O
3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
120 _TT---'r--"T'----r-- i i r I i 1 ; -_i_--_-.
b- -:
110 -
o
_..
':- QQ
10o
9O_-
b
8o
k
_._
7O
60 !
1 3
<x= -7.3 EC-1
MP4.
i
0
o
o
o
o
O
0
I
I
5 7
d
-4
d
4
9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
Fig. 24 Comparison of prediction with data at MP2 and MP4 for the square tip propeller.
= 2100
90
120 .....................
-
t
llOto
t
8o
'2-
7o!
60 t ,
0
0
0 o
I
! i
I
0
0
ot=O
BC-5 -
MP2
O0 o
I 0
0
I'10000,
-1
-I
i
I, ,i
120 _...................
110_ cno
t 0
L
100
_..
90_
L
80.:-
t
70
0 _ i
)0 o
00
0
00:,
LJ
i
I'
ct=O
I PAS
o DNW
I ;
BC-5
MP4_
q
0
oO i
120
110
"_ 100
= 90
r.e2
O
m 70
60 .
;lll_lli;lll!l-"l'l;[yq
O
0 o
0
0
0
o
c_ = 3.8
000
0
Ili
I
I o
d
LC-2 2,,:
4
d
-4
5
--3.
"I
o
,L_4}
110 _ _ o
i..-i
100
u-i
90--,
;--i
80,-,
70_
60 ''
120 _ ..... _-_--.-_ ...... T-T-- ,TT'-]
c_ = 3.8 LC-2 i
MP4;
fi
0 0 0
o 4
000
0 0 0 q
0 q
I
I
i
i
I
i ,
0
, I",,"
120
110
100
90
8O
70
6O
0
O
OOO
I 1 I ; I I I 1 _ _ I I 1 _ I I I I ;
ct = -7.3 EC2
MP2
0
0
d
O0 o
0
! o
0
ii oo
9 11 13 15 17 19
120 _ ........ --,--, .......
110
100
9O
80
70
,<)
,_ 0
, 0 0
' 60
1 3 5 7 1 3 5
Harmonic number
d
ct - -7.3 EC-2
MP4_
-4
C) 0
0 _
0
I 0
o
0 _
0 0
"I
0 '
I
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
Fig. 25 Comparison of prediction with data at MP2 and MP4 for the square tip propeller.
f_ = 2400
91
130 - .................... q
ot = 0 BC-6 q
MP2]
-q
O
O Oo
L
120 i- o
110 '
i
90
80
70
0000
Q
I PAS
o DNW
O o
0 0 0 0
130: .................... j
a = 0 BC-6 -
t-
120
h
110 _
100 _
r
,2
80_
L
70 _,
00000
' I
, I
1
O00
oO o
000
MP4_
O00
-i
I
L
120_ o
"d 110 :.L
100
_ 90
0
m 80
70
000
c_ = 3,8
0
000
0
0 o
O0
LC-3
000 fi
0
?
130 ._--,-_-,--_-=-_--_,
c_ = 3.8
120 _
0 () 0 O 0
llO F
9o) ,
I
L _
70 _, I
000000
!
LC-3 ]'
MP4 q
0 () 0 ]
0 O 0
c_
!
]
i
i
q
130
120
110
100
9O
80
7O
: I I I I I I I _ _ I I ; ; T I I I
ot = -7.3 EC-3
Oo MP2
-0
0 o
0 OOO0
0
0 -
1 3
] I
I
_ [
5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
130,, : , I--T--'7"--'FrrTT I , _ , I 1 r I
h _ = -7.3 EC-3
MP4
120 c', o o o c o 0 0 o
0 () 0
i
110
100
9O
8O
7O
1
O0 o
0
0 0
t I
3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
Fig. 26 Comparison of prediction with data at MP2 and MP4 for the square tip propeller.
f_ = 2700
!
-4
92
120, ....................
_ MP6q
110_-
100'
k
80
70
60
o
)
O
--4
, II:lll]lll'll:
120 _....................
i a =-7.3 EC-4
110 _ MP6j
h
Q
100 -
C)
90
0 o
80
I1
%
60 |*
I PAS
o DNW
J _J___I--L--..d----.L_ I
-q
I ' I I ;
120 , ...................
E
110 P
m ::
100_
k
_ 90
"_ 80
o
m 70
6O
J
a = 3.8 LC-4 -,
MP8 -
.-I
-t
.-t
0 _
, I ....... , .... i
120 ,_-, ............
b ot = -7.3
110 _
100 _ ,3
O
9oE o
80
0
70
60 ,
EC-4 _
-4
q
----t
4
.q
i
! I l ] i I I i : I t i
120 ....................
cx = 3.8 LC-4
110
100
9O
8O
7O
6O
O
1 3
()
MP9
v
I I I ' i _ I I _ 1 I I I I
5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
110 ._
100 _
9O
80
70
60
1
0
(i)
'4
et = -7.3 EC-4 j
q
A
4
o i
G 4
4
5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmomc number
Fig. 27 Comparison of prediction with DNW data at MP6, MP8 and MiX)
for the square tip propeller, f_ = 1800 RPM
93
110
100_
90-
80-_
70_
60 ,.
120 : ....................
,- -i
ct=38 LC 1
MP6_
]
!
o
I
!tl
q
12oF.................... i
r a = -7 3 EC-1
. -_
MP6_:
--1
110
1-
100 i-"
b J (I) 0
F
[
80_
L
70 _
r
60 L ....
Oo
I PAS
o DNW
q
--I
F I i 1 I ,i : L I :
120 : ...................
k
L
L
110 _-
"_ _o
_ 100_
VI I"1
_ ,.-i
70_
o
)
} 0
0
0
o
'q
ot = 3.8 LC-1
MP8 __
4
"4
---4
4
0
-!,
, I I i I I I I I I
120 ;_
110_
k
b
90_
k
k
L
70P
i_
60 i ,
iil!rr-I;lll!
= -7.3
(D
o
_j
o
o
o
o
-1-- I l ; I _ i
"!
EC-1 Z::
MP8q
4
o
....-4
o
120
110
100
9O
8O
7O
6O
I I 1 i i I I 1 i ! I 1 I -[ 1 I I i "-7
ct = 3.8 LC-1
MP 9
3
0
@o
I
II
I
0
IIl:llll
120 ..... - .... --, ....
c_ =-7.3 EC-1
110
0
i-
!_
100 _-
90a
i-
8o _
70 ) :
k
6O_. i
1 3
0
0
T (
0
I
5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 5 7
Harmonic number Harmonic number
Fig. 28 Comparison of prediction with DNW data at MP6, MP8 and MP9
for the square tip propeller, g2 = 2100 RPM
MP9:
4
4
4
I
O
4
-!
1
, ' I I I i 1 t i
9 11 13 15 17 19
94
120 _....................
L
110_
loo#
F
80
L
70/
F_
60:,
9
'<b
0
(D
()
ot = 3.8
0
O
I
I
i
LC-2
MP6_
-4
i
i
l
, <_ ,_
120 ,o ....................
::: a = -7.3 EC-2
(_I)
110 _-
F
P
,a
100 _
F
8o _
F
70 ';-
F
i-
@0
@
__i
0
I
I i
MP6
I PAS
o DNW
-i
, i
LL
120 ..........
110 _ ._
I:rl ![ O0 0
Q
100 ..-,
-i
90'-"
[..9
.'u 80
o
7O
6O
-i
-i
-i
-i
-i
-i
-, l
O0
i i , ! I ---r--'T---Z--T--'T 7
!
= 3.8 LC-2 _
0
0
O
0
0
0 o
_ d
I 4
'li , ,!
1
.It z-v ,r'T---r--. -r _ _ _ _ _ _ : , , : _ r ---r---q---T---r--
}-
., (_
110 '_
I'-I
80 _
:1 ,
1
70 _
60 FI .
0
Q
0
I
0
0
c_ = -7.3 EC-2
MP8
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
120
110
100
9O
8O
7O
6O
i i i _ i i i ; i T ( _ 1 i i ; i i i
ot = 3.8 LC-2
MP 9
@
@
1 3
_0 o
I
I
O 0
0
O
0
O0
ii iOo
5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
120 i .......... -,-., ........ ,
t "i
c_ =-7.3 EC-2
110 i
90
80
70
6O
1
MP9
d
I
'1
iI
5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
Fig. 29 Comparison of prediction with DlX_ data at MP6, MP8 and MP9
for the square tip propeller, g2 = 2400 RPM
95
120
o 110
>
= 100
rll
e_
_ 90
o
80
130 ...................
a = 3.8 LC-3
120 MP 6
110 o
O
i
100 , Ooo
z"-,
C-' 0
9O I
I 0
I
8o I
I
i ,I 2
70 ' --'-
130 ....................
a = 3.8 LC-3
MP8
70
130
120
110
100
9O
80
70
o00OOOOo
O0
I
0 0 C,
I
I
I
I
(---_
fm
"_0
0
0
I
r
I
]
I
I
__ .---.4,'
cx = 3.8" LC-3
MP9
)_
0
OoOo00
O000
0 o
0
"_C
3
I
I
I
5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
130 ....................
a = -7.3 EC-3
MP6
120
(1) _ 6)
110
100
90
80
0 -_--
c}
O
,
,::J)
i
I PAS
o DNW
130 ....................
k a = -7.3
120
P
[ Q(:'O 000 O
Oo
t ) 0 o
llOI o
[
t
lOO[
t
9ol
' I
+of
t I
70 t ..... A......... ,....
130 .........
EC-3 i
MP8
1
O
O O
OC
I
1
1
120 o
0
110
i
i
100
90
80
70
1 3
a = -7.3
0
C;, 0 0 0 '0
'0 0
IIJ:lll,l
EC-3
MP 9
!
5
OO
O
O o
0
I
i
7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Harmonic number
Fig. 30 Comparison of prediction with DNW data at MP6, MP8 and MP9
for the square tip propeller, f_ = 2700 RPM
96
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved
OMB No. 0704.0188
Public reporting burden for this collectmn of 0ntormal_n is estm_amd to average 1 hour per response, mduding the "me for rewewmg instnx:lmnS, ma.rch,ng oxming data sources,
gallN_ircj a<l rn_ntanng U'_ data needed, and ornp4ehng aP,l mvmvang _ coiklchon of infofwlabon. ,Send oommen_ regardincj this b_rdqm eltima_ or any ott'ler aspect of this
o=41ecl_ of infom_bon, including suggestions for mduang _ burden, to Washington Headquartlrs Servmes. Oimclorata for Infom',a_on Operation= and Repocts. 1215 Jeflemon Daws
Highway.Suite;204. Arhngton, VA 222O2-43O2, andtotheOffmeof Management andBudgeLPaperwo_Reductx_Project(0704-0188),Washmgt_, DC 205O3
1. AGENCY USE ONLY ( Leave blank) 12. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED
J February 1997
4. TITLE ANDSU_/i/LE
A Users Guide for the NASA ANOPP Propeller Analysis System
6. AUTHOR(S)
L. Cathy Nguyen and Jeffrey J. Kelly
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
Lockheed Martin Engineering and Sciences
Hampton, Virginia 23666
9. SPONSC_,:t'G I MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
NASA Langley Research Center
Hampton, VA 23681-0001
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
Langley Technical Monitor: Robert A. Golub
Final Report
Contractor Report
5. FUNDING NUMBERS
NAS1-96014
538-03-13-01
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION
REPORT NUMBER
10. SPONSORING/MONITORING
AGENCY REPORT NUMBER
NASA CR-4768
12L OI,_I'diUTION I AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Unclassified/Unlimited
Subject Category 71
13. AI_._THACT (l_ximum 200 _.,,i_4)
121). DISTRIBUTION CODE
The purpose of thisreport isto document improvementsto the Propeller Analysis System of the AircraftNoise Prediction
Program (PAS-ANOPP) and to serve as a users guide. An overviewof the functional modules and modificationsmade to the
Propeller ANOPP systemare described. Propeller noisepredictionsare made by executing a sequence of functional
modules throughthe use of ANOPP control statements. The most commonly used ANOPP control statements are discussed
with detailed examples demonstrating the use of each control statement. Originally, the Propeller Analysis System included
the angle-of-attack only in the performance module. Recently, modificationshave been made to also includeangle-of-attack
in the noise predictionmodule. A brief descriptionof PAS predictioncapabilities is presented whichillustratethe input
requirementsnecessary to run the codeby way of ten templates. The purpose of the templates are toprovide PAS users
with complete examples which can be modified toserve their particular purposes. The examples includethe use of different
approximations in the computation of the noise and the effects of synchrophasing. Since modificationshave been made to
the original PAS-ANOPP, comparisons of the modifiedANOPP and wind tunnel data are also included. Two appendices are
attached at the end of this report which provide usefulreference material. One appendix summarizes the PAS functional
modules while the second provides a detailed discussion of the TABLE control statement.
14. SUBJECT TERMS
ANOPP-PAS Users Guide; Propeller Analysis System; Propeller noise predictions
17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECU_Ii-_ CLASSIFICATION
OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE
Unclassified Unclassified
NSN 7540-01-280-5500
19. SECURITY CLASSIRCATION
OF ABSTRACT
15. NUMBER OF PAGES
102
!16. PRICE CODE
A06
20. UMtTATION OF ABSTRACT
Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89)
ProsCnbOCIby ANS', Std Z39 18