Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Q
Q
Q
H
H
H
H
i=1
b
ni
,
b
n
=
k
i=1
(a
ni
+ b
ni
),
(1)
3
together with positive initial values a
i
, b
i
(0 i < k). First, we are going to
prove a short lemma on the quotient
an
bn
quite surprisingly, we can give a
rather simple formula for this fraction in terms of n:
Lemma 1 Let a
n
, b
n
be given by the system (1). Then, the quotient
an
bn
can
be written as
an
bn
=
rn
rn+k
, where r
n
is a linear recurrent sequence given by
the initial values r
n
=
an
bn
n1
j=0
_
a
j
b
j
+
_
(0 n k) and the recurrence
r
n
= r
n1
+ r
nk1
.
Proof: By simple induction on n. Note rst that
b
k
a
k
=
k1
j=0
a
j
+ b
j
b
j
=
k1
j=0
_
a
j
b
j
+
_
by (1), so r
k
= 1. Thus, we have, for n k,
r
n+k
= r
n+k1
+ r
n1
=
2
r
n+k2
+ r
n1
+ r
n2
= . . . =
n
r
k
+
n
j=1
j1
r
nj
=
n
+
n
j=1
j1
a
nj
b
nj
nj1
i=0
_
a
i
b
i
+
_
,
and it is not dicult to prove (by means of another induction) that this equals
n1
j=0
_
a
j
b
j
+
_
.
Therefore,
r
n
r
n+k
=
a
n
b
n
holds for n k. For the induction step, note again that dividing the two
equations in (1) yields
b
n
a
n
=
k
i=1
_
a
ni
b
ni
+
_
.
Now, by the denition of r
n
and the induction hypothesis, we have
a
ni
b
ni
+ =
r
ni
+ r
ni+k
r
ni+k
=
r
ni+k+1
r
ni+k
4
and hence
k
i=1
_
a
ni
b
ni
+
_
=
_
n+k
i=n+1
r
i
__
n+k1
i=n
r
i
_
1
=
r
n+k
r
n
,
which nishes the induction.
Now, the rst equation in (1) can be written as
x
n
=
k
i=1
x
ni
+ y
n
,
where x
n
= log b
n
and y
n
= log
bn
an
= log
r
n+k
rn
. Iteration yields
x
n
=
n
i=k
d
k1,n+ki1
y
i
+
k1
l=0
d
l,n
x
l
,
where the sequences d
l,n
are dened by d
l,n
= 0 (0 n < k, n = l), d
l,l
= 1
and d
l,n
=
k
i=1
d
l,ni
. Note that we obtain the Fibonacci sequence in the case
k = 2. From a result of Brauer [2], we know that the polynomial x
k
k1
i=0
x
i
has a dominant root > 1 and all other roots have absolute value < 1. Let
=
1
,
2
,
3
, . . . ,
k
be the roots of this polynomial. Then there are constants
l,j
(0 l < k, 1 j k) such that
d
l,n
=
k
j=1
l,j
n
j
.
Suppose that
2
is the root of second-largest modulus. Then
d
l,n
=
l,1
n
+ O(|
2
|
n
)
and thus
k1
l=0
d
l,n
x
l
=
_
k1
l=0
l,1
x
l
_
n
+ O(|
2
|
n
).
Furthermore,
n
i=k
d
k1,n+ki1
y
i
=
k
j=1
k1,j
n
i=k
n+ki1
j
y
i
.
We have to distinguish two dierent cases for the inner sum. For both cases,
we note rst that the polynomial x
k+1
x
k
has a dominant positive root
5
, so r
n
=
n
(1 + O(
n
)), where and > 1 are positive constants. This
shows that y
n
= log
r
n+k
rn
= (k log )(1+O(
n
)). We use C as an abbreviation
for k log . Now, for j > 1, we have
n
i=k
n+ki1
j
y
i
=
n1
i=k1
i
j
y
n+k1i
=
k1i
n+k
2
1
i
j
y
n+k1i
+
n+k
2
1<in1
i
j
y
n+k1i
=
k1i
n+k
2
1
i
j
C(1 + O(
n/2
)) + O
_
_
n+k
2
1<in1
|
j
|
i
_
_
= C
i=k1
i
j
+ O(|
j
|
n/2
) + O(
n/2
).
On the other hand,
n
i=k
n+ki1
y
i
=
n+k1
n
i=k
i
y
i
=
n+k1
i=k
i
y
i
n+k1
i=n+1
i
y
i
=
n+k1
i=k
i
y
i
C
n+k1
i=n+1
i
(1 + O(
n
))
=
n+k1
i=k
i
y
i
C
k1
1
+ O(
n
).
Altogether, we see that there are positive constants A, B such that
b
n
A B
n
and a
n
e
C
A B
n
.
Inserting in the rst equation of (1) yields A = e
C
k1
, so we arrive at the
following theorem:
Theorem 2 If a
n
, b
n
are given by the system (1), then there is a positive
constant B (which depends on the initial values) and another constant =
min(|
2
|
1/2
,
1/2
) > 1 such that
b
n
=
k
k1
B
n
(1 + O(
n
)) and a
n
=
k
2
k1
B
n
(1 + O(
n
)),
where is the unique positive root of the polynomial x
k+1
x
k
and is
the dominant root of x
k
k1
i=0
x
i
.
6
Remark: In the special case that corresponds to the Fibonacci numbers of
Fibonacci trees (i.e. k = 2, = = 1), we have = 1.465571 . . . and
B = 1.786445 . . .. B is easily calculated by the formula
log B =
1
i=0
_
1 +
5
2
_
i
log
r
i+2
r
i
=
1
i=1
_
1 +
5
2
_
i
r
i+1
,
where r
0
= r
1
= r
2
= 1 and r
n
= r
n1
+ r
n3
. Now, we have
a
n
A
1
B
n
, b
n
A
2
B
n
,
where A
1
and A
2
are the positive roots of the polynomials x
3
2x
2
+ 5x 1
and x
3
+ 2x
2
+ x 1 respectively. If we set B
:= B
5
, we obtain
a
n
A
1
B
Fn
, b
n
A
2
B
Fn
,
where F
n
denotes the Fibonacci numbers. Thus, a
n
and b
n
almost behave like
the multiplicative Fibonacci sequences studied in [3]. Remembering that the
number of vertices of the n-th Fibonacci tree is exactly V
n
= F
n+2
1, we see
that the Fibonacci number of the n-th Fibonacci tree is asymptotically
1.120000 (1.641439)
Vn
.
From [9], we know that the Fibonacci number of a tree with V vertices lies
between F
V +2
and 2
V 1
+ 1. Furthermore, it was shown in [10] that the
average Fibonacci number of a tree is asymptotically 1.129410 (1.674490)
V
,
so the Fibonacci number of a Fibonacci tree is comparatively small.
Remark: We can easily modify the construction of Fibonacci trees in the
following way: the subtrees of the k-ary analogue of order n are the trees of
order n 1, n 2, . . . , n k. Then, the corresponding system of recurrences
for the Fibonacci numbers of these trees has exactly the form (1).
Acknowledgement
The author was supported by Austrian Science Fund project no. S-8307-MAT.
7
References
[1] A. V. Aho and N. J. A. Sloane. Some doubly exponential sequences.
Fibonacci Quart., 11(4):429437, 1973.
[2] A. Brauer. On algebraic equations with all but one root in the interior of
the unit circle. Math. Nachr., 4:250257, 1951.
[3] S. Falcon. Fibonaccis multiplicative sequence. Internat. J. Math. Ed.
Sci. Tech., 34(2):310315, 2003.
[4] R. P. Grimaldi. Properties of Fibonacci trees. In Proceedings of the
Twenty-second Southeastern Conference on Combinatorics, Graph The-
ory, and Computing (Baton Rouge, LA, 1991), volume 84, pages 2132,
1991.
[5] P. Kirschenhofer, H. Prodinger, and R. F. Tichy. Fibonacci numbers of
graphs. II. Fibonacci Quart., 21(3):219229, 1983.
[6] P. Kirschenhofer, H. Prodinger, and R. F. Tichy. Fibonacci numbers of
graphs. III. Planted plane trees. In Fibonacci numbers and their applica-
tions (Patras, 1984), volume 28 of Math. Appl., pages 105120. Reidel,
Dordrecht, 1986.
[7] D. E. Knuth. The art of computer programming. Volume 3. Addison-
Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass.-London-Don Mills, Ont., 1973.
Sorting and searching, Addison-Wesley Series in Computer Science and
Information Processing.
[8] R. E. Merrield and H. E. Simmons. Topological Methods in Chemistry.
Wiley, New York, 1989.
[9] H. Prodinger and R. F. Tichy. Fibonacci numbers of graphs. Fibonacci
Quart., 20(1):1621, 1982.
8
[10] S. G. Wagner. Subset counting in trees. Ars Combinatoria, to appear,
2006.
AMS Classication Numbers: 05C30, 05C69, 11B37
9