Imidacloprid and thiamethoxam seed treatments significantly reduced flea beetle feeding injury to leaves in all varieties of sweet corn. Seed treatments did not control Stewart's wilt as effectively as genetic resistance. Disease incidence in resistant varieties 'Dynamo' and 'Bonus' was relatively low (p5%) with or without a seed treatment.
Imidacloprid and thiamethoxam seed treatments significantly reduced flea beetle feeding injury to leaves in all varieties of sweet corn. Seed treatments did not control Stewart's wilt as effectively as genetic resistance. Disease incidence in resistant varieties 'Dynamo' and 'Bonus' was relatively low (p5%) with or without a seed treatment.
Imidacloprid and thiamethoxam seed treatments significantly reduced flea beetle feeding injury to leaves in all varieties of sweet corn. Seed treatments did not control Stewart's wilt as effectively as genetic resistance. Disease incidence in resistant varieties 'Dynamo' and 'Bonus' was relatively low (p5%) with or without a seed treatment.
Control of corn ea beetle and Stewarts wilt in sweet corn with
imidacloprid and thiamethoxam seed treatments Thomas P. Kuhar a, *, Lydia J. Stivers-Young b , Michael P. Homann a , Alan G. Taylor c a Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Insectary Building, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA b New York Crop Research Facility, Batavia, NY 14020, USA c Department of Horticultural Sciences, NYSAES, Cornell University, Geneva, NY 14456, USA Received 18 December 2000; received in revised form 9 March 2001; accepted 5 April 2001 Abstract Two eld-plot experiments were conducted in western and central New York to evaluate imidacloprid and thiamethoxam seed treatments for control of corn ea beetle, Chaetocnema pulicaria Melsheimer, and Stewarts bacterial wilt in three varieties of sweet corn. Seed treatments signicantly reduced ea beetle feeding injury to leaves in all varieties and reduced disease incidence 3783% in the susceptible variety Sprint. Seed treatments did not control Stewarts wilt as eectively as genetic resistance. Disease incidence in the resistant varieties Dynamo and Bonus was relatively low (p5%) with or without a seed treatment. Additional on-farm evaluations conducted in western New York conrmed the results obtained from our eld plots with incidence of Stewarts wilt E88% lower in imidacloprid-treated elds compared with non-treated elds. Laboratory germination tests indicated that seed treatments with imidacloprid may have some phytotoxic eects, depending on sweet corn variety and vigor of the seed lot. A general recommendation is that only high quality seed lots should be treated with imidacloprid and that carry-over seed should not be used. r 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Erwinia stewartii; Pest management; Chaetocnema pulicaria 1. Introduction Stewarts bacterial wilt is an important disease of sweet corn in the central and eastern United States. In 1999, losses in sweet corn yield attributed to Stewarts wilt exceeded $1 million in the state of New York alone (Homann et al., 2000). The disease is caused by the bacterial pathogen, Erwinia stewartii, (Smith) Dye, and is vectored almost exclusively by the corn ea beetle, Chaetocnema pulicaria Melsheimer (Coleoptera: Chry- somelidae) (Pepper, 1967). The bacteria overwinter in the gut of adult C. pulicaria (Poos, 1936). In the spring, beetles infest early plantings of corn and transmit the pathogen to the plant by feeding and defecating on leaves (Dill, 1979). Secondary infection and spread of the disease occurs as beetles feed on infected plants and disperse throughout the eld. Once a plant is infected, bacteria multiply in the vascular tissue, restricting the ow of nutrients and water (Pepper, 1967). Symptoms of infection include light yellow to brown stripes or streaks with wavy or irregular margins on the leaves and stalks. Stems clogged with the multiplying bacteria show a typical discoloration when cut in cross section. Seedlings that survive early infections remain stunted, tassel prema- turely, and frequently produce unmarketable ears. Severe infections of Stewarts wilt may result in death to the plant (Ivano, 1933; Suparyono and Pataky, 1986). Disease severity depends on growth stage of the corn plant at the time of infection, resistance or susceptibility of the hybrid, and the abundance of inocula (Pataky et al., 1990). Climatic conditions after inoculation can aect disease severity as well. Warm temperatures encourage faster symptom development and movement of the bacteria through the plant and arid conditions impact plant growth and health, which in turn, can aect severity. *Corresponding author. Present address: Department of Entomol- ogy, Eastern Shore Agricultural Research & Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, 33446 Research Drive, Painter, VA 23420, USA. Tel.: +1-757-414-0724; fax: +1-757- 414-0730. E-mail address: tkuhar@vt.edu (T.P. Kuhar). 0261-2194/02/$ - see front matter r 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. PII: S 0 2 6 1 - 2 1 9 4 ( 0 1 ) 0 0 0 5 6 - 4 Stewarts wilt resistance occurs in a number of sweet corn hybrids (Ivano and Riker, 1936; Pataky et al., 1988) and new varieties are continually being screened and rated for Stewarts wilt resistance (Pataky et al., 1998, 2000a). Planting resistant varieties is the best means of disease control. However, resistant varieties are not available for all planting and market windows for processing and fresh market corn production (Homann et al., 1995). Also, plant resistance is not always eective if plants encounter severe ea beetle infestations or if plants are infected too early (Supar- yono and Pataky, 1989). Another strategy for managing Stewarts wilt is to control corn ea beetles before they can transmit the pathogen to corn. Applications of the systematic insecticide carbofuran at planting were shown to provide adequate control of ea beetles and signi- cantly reduced Stewarts wilt incidence on susceptible varieties (Heichel et al., 1977; Ayers et al., 1979; Homann et al., 1993). However, the granular formulation of carbofuran is no larger registered on corn in the USA and liquid formulations of the insecticide have been identied for possible regulatory action under the US Food Quality Protection Act and the Environmental Protection Agencys pesti- cide re-registration program (Anonymous, 1999). Foliar applications of esfenvalerate, permethrin, or lambda- cyhalothrin are also used to control corn ea beetles in the USA, but are often not eective because beetles colonize elds rapidly and re-colonize elds after spraying, which makes timing of sprays dicult to optimize (Munkvold et al., 1996). Planting seed treated with a systemic insecticide is a new option currently being researched for manag- ing corn ea beetle populations and concomitant Stewarts wilt incidence in sweet corn. Seed applica- tion results in less chemical exposure to humans and the environment. Imidacloprid (Gaucho s , Bayer AG, Germany), a chloronicotinyl insecticide has shown promise as a seed treatment for control of corn ea beetle. Munkvold et al. (1996) showed that seed treated with imidacloprid at 3 or 6 g a.i./kg of seed killed ea beetles and reduced the number of feeding wounds and Stewarts wilt symptoms in greenhouse studies. Pataky et al. (2000b) recently published one of the rst eld evaluations of imidacloprid seed treatments on sweet corn. They showed that imidacloprid and another neonicotinoid insecticide, thiamethoxam, re- duced the incidence of Stewarts wilt by E5085% relative to nontreated controls. The objectives of our study were to evaluate further the ability of seed- treatment insecticides to control corn ea beetle feeding injury and concomitant Stewarts wilt disease in processing sweet corn in New York, and to assess any potential phytotoxicity associated with the seed treatment application. 2. Materials and methods Field plots were established at two locations in New York in 2000, one at the H.C. Thompson Vegetable Crops Research Farm near Freeville and the other at the New York Crop Research Facility in Batavia. Compar- isons of C. pulicaria population levels and Stewarts wilt incidence were also made in ve non-treated and ve imidacloprid-treated commercial elds of processing sweet corn planted in western New York. In addition, potential phytotoxicity of the seed treatments was assessed in the laboratory by evaluating germination rate and nal germination of treated and non-treated seed. 2.1. Research trial at Batavia The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replicates. Treatments included two rates of imidacloprid (Gaucho s 600FS [Gustafson LLC, Dallas, TX]) at 1.25 and 2.5 g a.i./kg seed, one rate of thiamethoxam (Adage s [Syngenta, Greensboro, NC]) at 2.0 g a.i./kg seed, plus an untreated control for each of three varieties of processing sweet corn: Sprint, which is susceptible to Stewarts wilt, Dynamo, which is moderately resistant, and Bonus, which is resistant. All seed lots were pre-treated commercially with chemical fungicides. Insecticide seed treatments were applied with a laboratory-scale seed treater (Hege II, Hege Equipment, Colwich, KS) in the fourth authors laboratory in the Department of Horticultural Sciences, NYSAES, Geneva, NY. The Hege II employs a spinning-disc to atomize the plant protectants onto the seeds, resulting in uniform application. A binder (CTS- additive, Gustafson Inc., Dallas, TX) was included with each treatment to improve adhesion. Plots were planted on 31 May using a Precision Garden Seeder Model 1001-B (Earth Way Products, Inc.; Bristol, IN, USA). Individual plots were 2 rows by 7.62 m. All plots received an application of 15-15-15 general purpose fertilizer at 300 kg/ha just prior to planting, plus a side dressing of urea (46% N) at 240 kg/ha, on 22 June. An application of s-metolachlor (0.85 kg/ha)+atrazine (1.68 kg/ha) herbicide mixture was made on 5 June (pre-emergence) for weed control. At the 6- to 8-leaf stage (5 July) and mid-whorl stage (13 July), corn plants with Stewarts wilt symptoms (leaf streaking, stunting, and/or wilting) were counted, and severity of symptoms rated on a standarized 0 to 9 scale based on Suparyono and Pataky (1989). According to this scale, a rating of 0=no symptoms, 1=a single leaf exhibiting disease symptoms restricted to the site of inoculation, 2=little spread within a single leaf, 3=limited spread with water-soaking, chlorosis, and necrosis of inoculated leaves, 4=abundant spread, 5= limited systemic infection of entire plants (uninoculated T.P. Kuhar et al. / Crop Protection 21 (2002) 2531 26 leaves exhibiting symptoms), 6=severe symptoms of 25 50% of the plant, 7=severe symptoms of 5075% of the plant, 8=severe necrosis and wilting, and 9=plant death. Yield was evaluated in August by picking all harvestable ears per plot and weighing them with husks in the eld. Secondary ears were picked and weighed if their size was >75% of the primary ear. The eect of seed treatment and variety on incidence of Stewarts wilt, severity of disease symp- toms, plant emergence, and yield were analyzed with ANOVA. Treatments were compared using Tukeys HSD at the 0.05 level of signicance. All proportion data were normalized using an arcsine square-root transformation before analysis (Ott, 1984); however actual percentages are presented in the paper. 2.2. Research trial at Freeville The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replicates. Treatments were the same as in the previous experiment except that thiamethoxam was not tested. Plots were plowed and fertilized with 15- 15-15 general purpose fertilizer at E300 kg/ha and were seeded by hand on 1 June. Each plot consisted of 30 seeds planted in a row with 0.25-m between plants and 0.80-m between rows. Weeds were removed manually as needed. The number of corn plants emerging per plot was counted E3 weeks after emergence and the number of leaves per plant with corn ea beetle feeding injury assessed. Corn ea beetle feeding marks appear as narrow pinstripes parallel to the leaf veins E1050-mm in length. At the 6- to 8- leaf stage (12 July) and early- tassel stage (27 July), plants with Stewarts wilt symptoms (leaf streaking and/or wilting) were counted, and severity of symptoms rated as described in the previous experiment. Yield (mass of harvestable ears) was evaluated on 6 September. The eect of seed treatment and variety on ea beetle leaf feeding, percentage incidence of Stewarts wilt, severity of disease symptoms, plant emergence, and yield were analyzed with ANOVA. Treatments were compared using Tukeys HSD at the 0.05 level of signicance. 2.3. On-farm trials Comparisons were made in ve non-treated and ve imidacloprid-treated elds of processing sweet corn planted in western New York. All elds were located within a 5-mile radius of each other. All ve of the imidacloprid-treated elds and three of the ve non- treated elds were located on commercial farms and planted according to standard procedures in early to mid-May with the Stewarts wilt susceptible variety Sprint. Because of the lack of commercial non-treated elds, two elds were planted at the NYCRF station in close proximity to the commercial elds. These two elds were planted and maintained according to similar protocols as in commercial production. One eld was planted with Sprint and the other with Lumina, which has a similar susceptibility to Stewarts wilt. Corn seed was slurry treated with imidacloprid at a rate of 0 or 2.5 g a.i./kg seed according to the methods described earlier. Population levels of C. pulicaria were sampled from corn emergence to 10-leaf stage or later. Unbaited yellow sticky cards, which consisted of 15.2-cm 2 poly- styrene panels coated on both sides with Sticky Stu adhesive (Olson Products, Inc., Medina, OH), were used to sample beetles. Silicone-coated release paper was used to protect the adhesive sides of the trap, which allowed one side to be used at a time. Eight traps per eld were fastened to garden stakes at a trap height of 0.10.3-m above the ground (Adams and Los, 1986). Counts of C. pulicaria adults on sticky cards were recorded weekly. At the 8 to 10-leaf stage, 50 corn plants in each eld were assessed for Stewarts wilt incidence. Treated and non-treated elds were compared for corn ea beetle population levels and Stewarts wilt incidence using Students t-test at the 0.05 level of signicance. 2.4. Seed treatment germination test A single lot of Sprint and Bonus were obtained from Syngenta Seed, Inc. Vegetables (Boise, ID, USA), while Dynamo was obtained from Harris-Moran (Modesto, CA, USA). All seed lots were pre-treated commercially with chemical fungicides. Imidacloprid seed treatment was over-applied at 0 and 2.5 g a.i./kg seed using the Hege seed treater as described earlier. Seed samples were equilibrated at 50% relative humidity in custom designed Plexiglas chambers equipped with air circulation (Hacisalihoglu et al., 1999). The 50% relative humidity was maintained with a solution of glycerol and water resulting in a seed water activity of 0.5 (Taylor, 1997). Then samples were heat-sealed in plastic-laminate envelopes and placed in an incubator at a constant 451C for 7 days. Aged samples were removed for seed quality tests. Non-aged and aged samples were germinated in sand tests. Each experimental unit was sown 1.5 cm deep in a builders sand in 10 10 8 cm 3 plastic containers maintained at 251C constant. The rst count was determined 4 days after sowing, and the nal germination was recorded after 7 days. In addition, the New York State Seed Testing Laboratory, Geneva, NY, performed cold tests only on the non-aged samples. The cold test employed a eld soil, sand and peat mixture placed over the seeds on roll towels. The towels were maintained at 101C for the rst 7 days and then transferred to 251C for an additional 7 days. Seedlings were classied as normal or abnormal at the end of each test (Association of Ocial Seed Analysts, 1992), and only normal seedlings reported. The experimental design was a completely randomized design with a 3 2 T.P. Kuhar et al. / Crop Protection 21 (2002) 2531 27 factorial (3 cultivars 2 seed treatments) with four replications and 25 and 50 seeds per replication for sand tests and cold tests, respectively. An arc-sin trans- formation was performed on all data prior to the AOV. Interactions were signicant, and all treatments were compared using Tukeys HSD at the 0.05 level of signicance. 3. Results 3.1. Research trial at Batavia Climatic conditions were generally considered cool and wet during the 2000 growing season in western New York. Corn ea beetles were active in the eld plots immediately following emergence of corn and averaged 0.2 beetles per plant during the month of June in an adjacent sweet corn eld, which we were sampling for another research project. Incidence of Stewarts wilt ranged from 0% to 43% across all treatments and increased from 68 leaf to 10-leaf stage (Table 1). The latter may have been the result of two factors: more plants being infected in the time duration between sample dates, and disease symptoms increasing in plants that were previously infected at the rst rating, but not showing detectable symptoms. There was a signicant variety by seed treatment interaction on percent incidence of Stewarts wilt at 68 leaf stage (F=2.55; df=6, 33; Pp0.039) and 10-leaf stage (F=2.82; df=6, 33; Pp0.025). The eect of seed treatment was analyzed separately by variety. For the susceptible variety Sprint, seed treatment had a signicant eect on disease incidence at 68 leaf (F=9.64; df=3, 9; Pp0.036) and 10-leaf stage (F=11.23; df=3, 9; Pp0.021). The two rates of imidacloprid and the single rate of thiamethox- am provided similar levels of control and reduced incidence of Stewarts wilt E6883% compared with the non-treated seed. Seed treatment did not have a signicant eect on Stewarts wilt incidence in the Dynamo and Bonus varieties. Severity of Stewarts wilt symptoms increased from 68 leaf to 10-leaf stage for all treatments (Table 1). Peak disease severity diered by variety (F=11.63; df=2, 33; P=0.0002) rather than by seed treatment (F=0.76; df=3, 33; Pp0.522), and the interaction of these factors was not signicant (F=1.10; df=6, 33; P=0.381). Disease severity (09 scale) ranged from 4.3 to 5.0 in the treatments using Sprint, 0.7 to 3.1 in the treatments using Dynamo, and 0.3 to 3.0 in the treatments using Bonus. Yield as measured by the mass of unhusked ears per ha diered by variety (F= 24.57; df=2, 33; P=0.0001) and seed treatment (F=4.70; df=3, 33; P=0.0077), and the interaction of these factors was not signicant (F=1.10; df=6, 33; P=0.385). Yield was similar among the four treatments using Bonus, ranging from 17.3 to 19.9 MT/ha, and was signicantly higher than Dynamo non-treated (13.8 MT/ha) and all four treatments using Sprint (11.9 to 14.9 MT/ha) (Table 1). 3.2. Research trial at Freeville Climatic conditions were generally considered to be cool and wet during the growing season in central New York in 2000. Corn ea beetles were active in the eld Table 1 Eect of insecticide seed treatments on incidence and severity of Stewarts wilt, and yield of three sweet corn varieties in a eld experiment conducted in Batavia, NY a Variety Treatment Rate seed) Stewarts wilt (5 July) Stewarts wilt (13 July) Yield of unhusked (g ai/kg (68 leaf stage) (10-leaf stage) ears (MT/ha) % incidence Severity b % incidence Severity b Sprint Non-treated F 27.174.1 4.970.6 43.077.0 5.070.4 11.970.3 Thiamethoxam 2.0 3.272.5 2.471.4 12.177.2 4.470.7 12.870.7 Imidacloprid 1.5 6.573.9 3.871.3 13.677.2 4.570.6 14.771.8 Imidacloprid 2.5 4.271.5 5.371.5 7.372.1 4.370.7 14.971.3 Dynamo Non-treated F 6.071.4 5.470.9 8.876.2 2.471.4 13.871.7 Thiamethoxam 2.0 2.571.4 3.672.1 6.272.5 3.171.4 17.270.8 Imidacloprid 1.5 1.170.6 1.571.0 1.170.6 1.571.2 17.370.8 Imidacloprid 2.5 1.471.4 0.470.4 2.972.9 0.770.7 17.771.2 Bonus Non-treated F 1.570.6 4.872.0 1.970.7 3.071.7 17.771.2 Thiamethoxam 2.0 0.770.7 0.370.3 0.970.9 0.370.3 19.570.5 Imidacloprid 1.5 0.070.0 0.070.0 1.370.9 1.671.0 17.370.9 Imidacloprid 2.5 1.871.3 2.171.7 2.370.8 2.370.9 19.971.3 a Numbers represent mean7SE of four replicates. b Severity is based on a 0 to 9 scale described by Suparyono and Pataky (1989). T.P. Kuhar et al. / Crop Protection 21 (2002) 2531 28 plots soon after emergence of corn, averaging E0.3 beetles per plant during the month of June. Seed treatment had a signicant eect on corn ea beetle feeding injury (F=58.57; df=2, 24; Pp0.0001). For all three varieties, the number of leaves per plant with corn ea beetle feeding injury was lowest in the imidacloprid high-rate plots, followed by imidacloprid low rate, then the non-treated controls (Table 2). The high rate of imidacloprid seed treatment reduced the number of leaves per plant with feeding injury by E50% compared with the non-treated control. Incidence of Stewarts wilt increased from 68 leaf to early-tassel stage in all treatments (Table 2). Disease incidence at 68 leaf stage was eected by variety (F=17.71; df=2, 24; Pp0.0001) and seed treatment (F=6.18; df=2, 24; Pp0.007) and at early-tassel stage by variety only (F=41.89; df=2, 24; Pp0.0001). The variety by seed treatment interaction was not signicant at either sample period. In the Sprint variety, incidence of Stewarts wilt was reduced 37% and 43% by the imidacloprid low and high rates, respectively, compared with the non-treated control (Table 2). Stewarts wilt incidence was not dierent between the seed treatments and the control in the Dynamo and Bonus varieties. Severity of Stewarts wilt symptoms increased slightly from 68 leaf to early-tassel stage for all treatments (Table 2). Peak disease severity diered by variety (F=19.20; df=2, 24; Pp0.0001) rather than by seed treatment (F=0.46; df=2, 24; P=0.639), and the inter- action of these factors was not signicant (F=0.93; df=4, 24; P=0.464). Disease severity ranged from 4.4 to 5.4 in the treatments using Sprint, 2.2 to 4.4 in the treatments using Dynamo, and 0.3 to 1.0 in the treatments using Bonus. Plant emergence rate in the eld was high (X95%) for all treatments except Sprint non-treated and Sprint + imidacloprid at low rate, which averaged a signicantly lower 85% and 81%, respectively. Yield diered by variety (F=23.33; df=2, 24; Pp0.0001) and seed treat- ment (F=3.65; df=2, 24; Pp0.041), and the inter- action of these factors was not signicant (F=1.28; df=4, 24; P=0.304). Yield was similar among the six treatments using Bonus and Dynamo, ranging from 17.1 to 19.8 MT/ha, and was signicantly higher than the three treatments using Sprint (11.8 to 14.8 MT/ha; Table 2). Non-treated Sprint had a signicantly lower yield than Sprint + imidacloprid at high rate. 3.3. On-farm trials Weekly counts of C. pulicaria on sticky cards were averaged for the sampling period from corn emergence to 8-leaf stage. Numbers of C. pulicaria on sticky cards averaged 6.8671.98 beetles/trap/week (mean7SE) in the imidacloprid-treated elds, which was signicantly lower (t=6.359, df=8, Pp0.05) than in the non-treated elds, which averaged 29.1278.60 beetles/trap/week. This may be the result of imidacloprid killing beetles and thus, reducing their relative population densities in seed- treated elds. Incidence of Stewarts wilt in the treated elds (2.570.6%) also was signicantly lower than the non-treated elds, which averaged 20.7679.86% (t=5.82, df=8, Pp0.05). 3.4. Seed treatment germination test The rst seedling emergence count of non-aged seeds after 4 days ranged from 71% to 100% across all variety treatment combinations (Table 3). Final germination of non-aged seeds (after 7 days) ranged from 90% to 100%. Imidacloprid reduced 4 and 7-day germination in Sprint, but did not aect either germination parameter in Dynamo and Bonus. Aging decreased both 4-day and Table 2 Eect of insecticide seed treatments on corn ea beetle feeding injury, incidence and severity of Stewarts wilt, and yield of three sweet corn varieties in a eld experiment conducted near Freevile, NY a Variety Treatment Rate No. leaves per Stewarts wilt on 5 July Stewarts wilt on 13 July Yield of unhusked (g ai/kg seed) plant with feeding damage (68 leaf stage) (10-leaf stage) ears (MT/ha) % incidence Severity b % incidence Severity b Sprint Non-treated F 3.470.1 40.2712.3 3.470.7 43.0710.7 5.470.8 11.871.5 Imidacloprid 1.5 2.270.3 13.878.0 1.070.7 27.071.1 4.470.3 14.570.8 Imidacloprid 2.5 1.370.3 9.472.1 2.370.4 18.373.7 4.870.6 14.870.8 Dynamo Non-treated F 2.970.2 10.874.2 2.370.9 8.675.1 2.271.3 17.270.4 Imidacloprid 1.5 2.070.1 3.071.8 0.870.5 8.171.7 4.470.9 17.171.2 Imidacloprid 2.5 1.370.2 2.171.3 2.071.4 3.171.1 3.071.3 19.870.4 Bonus Non-treated F 2.870.1 1.37.13 0.370.3 1.371.3 0.370.3 19.071.3 Imidacloprid 1.5 2.270.2 0.070.0 0.070.0 0.970.9 1.071.0 17.771.1 Imidacloprid 2.5 1.870.3 0.070.0 0.070.0 1.871.0 0.570.3 19.670.8 a Numbers represent mean7SE of four replicates. b Severity is based on a 0 to 9 scale described by Suparyono and Pataky (1989). T.P. Kuhar et al. / Crop Protection 21 (2002) 2531 29 nal germination (Table 3). Imidacloprid reduced 4 and 7-day germination in Dynamo and only 4-day in Sprint. Aging plus imidacloprid seed treatment further reduced emergence for Sprint and Dynamo, but not Bonus. Imidacloprid had little eect on cold test results within each variety. 4. Discussion Our results indicate that imidacloprid and thia- methoxam seed treatments can signicantly reduce the incidence of Stewarts wilt disease in susceptible varieties of processing sweet corn in New York. Pataky et al. (2000b) obtained similar results in Illinois. Plant resistance remains the best means of controlling Stewarts wilt. However, insecticide seed treatments oer an eective method for managing the disease during the early growth stages of corn, when plant resistance can be variable (Suparyono and Pataky, 1989) and foliar insecticide applications are often ineective or inecient at controlling ea beetles (Munkvold et al., 1996). Certain questions remain, including how well seed treatments will control Stewarts wilt under warmer and more arid climatic conditions, and whether growers will get any benet out of additional foliar insecticide applications. The phytotoxic eects of insecticide seed treatments should be evaluated further in sweet corn. Taylor et al. (2001) showed that seed treatments may result in decreased germination and increased abnormal seed- lings. In our study, seedling emergence in the eld was not dierent between the imidacloprid-treated and non- treated plots within each variety. Munkvold et al. (1996) reported no detectable eect of imidacloprid seed treatment on plant growth or number of leaves per plant. However, seed treatment phytotoxicity is more apparent in laboratory germination tests using an inert substrate than in the eld (Taylor et al., 2001). Germination time is an early indicator of a decline in seed vigor, and a decline in germination rate precedes a decline in nal germination (Taylor, 1997). Results from our laboratory sand tests revealed that both seed lot quality and imidacloprid treatments were the factors that inuence seed performance. The high vigor lots were more tolerant to imidacloprid treatment or aging than the low vigor lots. In general, imidacloprid slowed the germination rate of seeds and the detrimental eect was more pronounced as seeds aged. In contrast, imidacloprid had little eect on cold test results within each variety that was attributed to the soil media adsorbing the seed treatment. Therefore, the seed testing method can inuence seed quality assessment of treated seeds. In summary, a general recommendation is that only high quality seed lots should be treated with imidacloprid and that carry-over should not be used. The use of imidacloprid-treated seed will likely increase in New York and other states in the USA if full registration of this compound is approved for use on sweet corn. In 2001, Gaucho s will again be available for use on sweet corn in New York through a Section 18 label. The registrant expects US federal (Section 3) registration before 2002 (Bayer AG, Germany, personal communication). Thiamethoxam is anticipated for regis- tration on sweet corn in the USA in 2001 (Syngenta, Greensboro, NC, personal communication). Acknowledgements The authors thank Ann Cobb and Helene Dillard, Department of Plant Pathology, NYSAES, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, USA for technical assistance with diagnosing Stewarts wilt disease and reviewing an earlier draft of this manuscript, respectively. We also thank Gib Scott and Laverne Lamkin of Agrilink Foods, Marion, NY for assistance with the on-farm sites. This research was supported in part by a grant from the New York Vegetable Research Council and the US Department of Agriculture, CSREES, Northeast Region IPM Program (Grant no. 00-34103-9110). Any opinions, ndings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reect the view of the US Department of Agriculture. References Adams, R.G., Los, L.M., 1986. Monitoring adult corn ea beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in sweet corn elds with color sticky traps. Environ. Entomol. 15, 867873. Table 3 Eect of imidacloprid seed treatment on germination of non-aged and aged seeds of three sweet corn varieties evaluated in a laboratory sand test a Variety Seed treatment % germination Non-aged seeds Aged seeds 4-day Final (7-day) Cold test 4-day Final (7-day) Sprint Non-treated 92abc 98ab 87ab 33c 85ab Treated b 71d 90c 80b 6d 77b Dynamo Non-treated 86bcd 98abc 84b 60b 94a Treated b 82cd 94ab 80b 33c 78b Bonus Non-treated 100a 100a 94a 93a 96a Treated b 96ab 97abc 95a 92a 94a a Numbers within columns followed by the same letter are not signicantly dierent according to Tukeys HSD at the 0.05 level of signicance. b Imidacloprid (Gaucho s 600FS) was applied with a Hege II seed treater at 2.5 a.i./kg seed. T.P. Kuhar et al. / Crop Protection 21 (2002) 2531 30 Anonymous, 1999. Pesticide reregistration performance measures and goals. United States Environment Protection Agency Federal Register, November 18, 1999, Vol. 64, No. 222, pp. 63,03663,045. Association of Ocial Seed Analysts, 1992. Seedling Evaluation Handbook. Contribution No. 35, Association of Ocial Seed Analysts, Lincoln, NE. Ayers, J.E., MacNab, A.A., Tetrault, R.C., Yocum, J.O., 1979. The inuence of selected insecticides on yield and the incidence of Stewarts wilt in sweet corn. Plant Dis. Rep. 63, 634638. Dill, J.F., 1979. Biology and management of the corn ea beetle, Chaetocnema pulicaria Melsheimer, relative to the incidence of Stewarts disease in corn. Ph.D. Dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. Hacisalihoglu, G., Taylor, A.G., Paine, D.H., Hilderbrand, M.B., Khan, A.A., 1999. Embryo elongation and germination rates as sensitive indicators of lettuce seed quality: priming and aging studies. HortScience 34, 12401243. Heichel, G.H., Sands, D.C., Kring, J.B., 1977. Seasonal patterns and reduction by carbofuran of Stewarts bacterial wilt of sweet corn. Plant Dis. Rep. 61, 149153. Homann, M.P., Dillard, H.R., Stivers, L.J., Cobb, A.C., 2000. Flea beetles and Stewarts wilt: minimizing risks in 2000. Proceedings, New York State Vegetable Conference, February 710, Syracuse, NY, USA, pp. 9396. Homann, M.P., Kirkwyland, J.J., Davis, P.M., 1995. Spatial distribution of adult corn ea beetles, Chaetocnema pulicaria (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in sweet corn and development of a sampling plan. J. Econ. Entomol. 88, 13241331. Homann, M.P., Orfanedes, M., Pedersen, L., 1993. Behavior and control of corn ea beetle. Proceedings, New York State Vegetable Conference, February 24, Syracuse, NY, USA, pp. 176179. Ivano, S.S., 1933. Stewarts wilt disease of corn, with emphasis on the life history of Phytomonas stewarti in relation to pathogenesis. J. Agric. Res. 47, 749770. Ivano, S.S., Riker, A.J., 1936. Resistance to bacterial wilt of inbred strains and crosses of sweet corn. J. Agric. Res. 53, 927954. Munkvold, G.P., McGee, D.C., Iles, A., 1996. Eects of imidacloprid seed treatment of corn on foliar feeding and Erwinia stewartii transmission by the corn ea beetle. Plant Dis. 80, 747749. Ott, L., 1984. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis, 2nd Edition PWS Boston, MA, USA. Pataky, J.K., du Toit, L.J., Freeman, N.D., 2000a. Stewarts wilt reactions of an international collection of Zea mays germplasm inoculated with Erwinia stewartii. Plant Dis. 84, 901906. Pataky, J.K., du Toit, L.J., Revilla, P., Tracy, W.F., 1998. Reactions of open-pollinated sweet corn cultivars to Stewarts wilt, common rust, northern leaf blight, and southern leaf blight. Plant Dis. 82, 939944. Pataky, J.K., Headrick, J.M., Suparyono, J., 1988. Classication of sweet corn hybrid reactions to common rust, northern leaf blight, Stewarts wilt and Goss wilt and associated yield reductions. Phytopathology 78, 172178. Pataky, J.K., Michener, P.M., Freeman, N.D., Weinzierl, R.A., Teyker, R.H., 2000b. Control of Stewarts wilt in sweet corn with seed treatment insecticides. Plant Dis. 84, 11041108. Pataky, J.K., Suparyono, J., Hawk, J.A., Gardiner, M.L., Pauly, M.H., 1990. Associations between Stewarts wilt ratings and maturity of sweet corn hybrids. Plant Dis. 74, 792796. Pepper, E.H., 1967. Stewarts Bacterial Wilt of Corn, Monograph No. 4. American Phytopathol. Society Heernan Press, Inc., Massu- chusetts, 36pp. Poos, F.W., 1936. Certain insect vectors of Aplanobacter stewarti. J. Agric. Res. 52, 585608. Suparyono, Pataky, J.K., 1986. Eect of disease onset and severity of Stewarts and Goss wilt on sweet corn. Phytopathology 76, 1079. Suparyono, Pataky, J.K., 1989. Inuence of host resistance and growth stage at the time of inoculation on Stewarts wilt and Gosss wilt development and sweet corn hybrid yield. Plant Dis. 73, 339345. Taylor, A.G., 1997. Seed storage, germination and quality. In: Wien, H.C. (Ed.), The Physiology of Vegetable Crops. CABI, UK, pp. 136. Taylor, A.G., Eckenrode, C.J., Straub, R.W., 2001. Seed coating technologies and treatments for onions: challenges and progress. HortScience 36, 199205. T.P. Kuhar et al. / Crop Protection 21 (2002) 2531 31
Detection of downy mildew [Peronosclerospora philippinensis (W. Weston) C.G. Shaw] resistance in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) based on chlorophyll content and biomass
Exploring The Combination and Modular Characteristics of Herbs For Alopecia Treatment in Traditional Chinese Medicine: An Association Rule Mining and Network Analysis Study