EFFECTUATION THEORY vs. CAUSATION By: Castaneda, Lorena lorenacastaneda@gmail.com ; Villavicencio, Jose Antonio jvillavicencio09@hotmail.com and Villaverde, Marcelino mvillaverdea@gmail.com (PERU). Proffesor: Dr Rita G. Klapper
By: Castaneda, Lorena lorenacastaneda@gmail.com ; Villavicencio, Jose Antonio jvillavicencio09@hotmail.com and Villaverde, Marcelino mvillaverdea@gmail.com (PERU).
Ref: Saras D. Sarasvathy. Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency.
Proffesor: Dr Rita G. Klapper
The Key elements of theory effectuation vs causation
Expert entrepreneurs have taken actions in the field that have shaped into interesting companies, making decisions in a unknown near future, an inverse proceeding of the classical causational process. Still, they have learned how to take into advantage the unknowable and start their businesses with strong foundations. Causation rests on a logic of prediction - effectuation on the logic of control.
Sarasvathy defines that ‘CAUSATION processes take a particular effect as given and focus on selecting between means to create that effect", while defining that ‘EFFECTUATION processes take a set of means as given and focus on selecting between possible effects that can be created with that set of means’.
The thought of EFFECTUATION does not start with a specific goal; it usually starts with a number of available resources and allows goals happen contingently over time, based on the imagination and diverse aspirations of entrepreneurs and people with whom they interact, focusing organization constantly reinvent continuously. Provides useful design principles for transforming existing environments, generating new ones.
CAUSAL reasoning begins with the definition of a predetermined goals and obtaining and selecting the means to achieve it. It seeks to identify the best alternative (faster, cheaper, more efficient) to achieve the given goal. Here we consider and develop business plans, calculations of return on investment (ROI) and the decision to diversify the portfolio of the company. CAUSAL thinking is based on the explotation of existing knowledge to predict the environment in which the organization will evolve, providing useful decision criteria to achieve the objectives.
Causation models focus on maximizing the potencial returns for a decisión by selecting optimal strategies, such as the porter model in strategy emphasize detailed competitive analyses, the logic of the causation is to extent that we can predict the future we can control it.
From theory to practice:
Examples of Causal behaviour
a. Causal 1: Responding some routinary request about a standard procedure.
b. Causal 2: Hire care specialist staff for Emergency Patients in a Hospital, in order to improve the service to citizens.
c. Causal 3: Implement an office with new building materials in a given schedule.
Examples of Effectual behaviour
d. Effectual 1 (pilot int the plane): When starting a new export company, at the beginning I had doubts about the unknown market and consumers, but is in the actual field where I learned the hard way how to make decisions and taking real actions.
e. Effectual 2 (what if): Just recently, I’ve been invited out to visit a new facility in Trujillo, despite my unknown schedule, I decided to go and finally I did not only learnt many facts about my new business, I also made new business contacts.
f. Effectual 3 (bird in hand): Four years ago when finishing my college studies and before preparing my thesis, I did not know much about my field, instead I knew about social networks and design, so I decided to create a network of students which within the years have become a bigger networking of profesionals, and have developed into one my own consulting profesional businesses with great success.
The link between effectuation theory + blue ocean theory
A Blue Ocean is created when the company achieves value innovation that creates value simultaneously for both: the buyer and the company; while Effectuation is a set of decision-making principles that expert entrepreneurs are observed to employ in situations of uncertainty.
The relati
By: Castaneda, Lorena lorenacastaneda@gmail.com ; Villavicencio, Jose Antonio jvillavicencio09@hotmail.com and Villaverde, Marcelino mvillaverdea@gmail.com (PERU).
Ref: Saras D. Sarasvathy. Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency.
Proffesor: Dr Rita G. Klapper
The Key elements of theory effectuation vs causation
Expert entrepreneurs have taken actions in the field that have shaped into interesting companies, making decisions in a unknown near future, an inverse proceeding of the classical causational process. Still, they have learned how to take into advantage the unknowable and start their businesses with strong foundations. Causation rests on a logic of prediction - effectuation on the logic of control.
Sarasvathy defines that ‘CAUSATION processes take a particular effect as given and focus on selecting between means to create that effect", while defining that ‘EFFECTUATION processes take a set of means as given and focus on selecting between possible effects that can be created with that set of means’.
The thought of EFFECTUATION does not start with a specific goal; it usually starts with a number of available resources and allows goals happen contingently over time, based on the imagination and diverse aspirations of entrepreneurs and people with whom they interact, focusing organization constantly reinvent continuously. Provides useful design principles for transforming existing environments, generating new ones.
CAUSAL reasoning begins with the definition of a predetermined goals and obtaining and selecting the means to achieve it. It seeks to identify the best alternative (faster, cheaper, more efficient) to achieve the given goal. Here we consider and develop business plans, calculations of return on investment (ROI) and the decision to diversify the portfolio of the company. CAUSAL thinking is based on the explotation of existing knowledge to predict the environment in which the organization will evolve, providing useful decision criteria to achieve the objectives.
Causation models focus on maximizing the potencial returns for a decisión by selecting optimal strategies, such as the porter model in strategy emphasize detailed competitive analyses, the logic of the causation is to extent that we can predict the future we can control it.
From theory to practice:
Examples of Causal behaviour
a. Causal 1: Responding some routinary request about a standard procedure.
b. Causal 2: Hire care specialist staff for Emergency Patients in a Hospital, in order to improve the service to citizens.
c. Causal 3: Implement an office with new building materials in a given schedule.
Examples of Effectual behaviour
d. Effectual 1 (pilot int the plane): When starting a new export company, at the beginning I had doubts about the unknown market and consumers, but is in the actual field where I learned the hard way how to make decisions and taking real actions.
e. Effectual 2 (what if): Just recently, I’ve been invited out to visit a new facility in Trujillo, despite my unknown schedule, I decided to go and finally I did not only learnt many facts about my new business, I also made new business contacts.
f. Effectual 3 (bird in hand): Four years ago when finishing my college studies and before preparing my thesis, I did not know much about my field, instead I knew about social networks and design, so I decided to create a network of students which within the years have become a bigger networking of profesionals, and have developed into one my own consulting profesional businesses with great success.
The link between effectuation theory + blue ocean theory
A Blue Ocean is created when the company achieves value innovation that creates value simultaneously for both: the buyer and the company; while Effectuation is a set of decision-making principles that expert entrepreneurs are observed to employ in situations of uncertainty.
The relati
EFFECTUATION THEORY vs. CAUSATION By: Castaneda, Lorena lorenacastaneda@gmail.com ; Villavicencio, Jose Antonio jvillavicencio09@hotmail.com and Villaverde, Marcelino mvillaverdea@gmail.com (PERU). Proffesor: Dr Rita G. Klapper
By: Castaneda, Lorena lorenacastaneda@gmail.com ; Villavicencio, Jose Antonio jvillavicencio09@hotmail.com and Villaverde, Marcelino mvillaverdea@gmail.com (PERU).
Ref: Saras D. Sarasvathy. Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency.
Proffesor: Dr Rita G. Klapper
The Key elements of theory effectuation vs causation
Expert entrepreneurs have taken actions in the field that have shaped into interesting companies, making decisions in a unknown near future, an inverse proceeding of the classical causational process. Still, they have learned how to take into advantage the unknowable and start their businesses with strong foundations. Causation rests on a logic of prediction - effectuation on the logic of control.
Sarasvathy defines that ‘CAUSATION processes take a particular effect as given and focus on selecting between means to create that effect", while defining that ‘EFFECTUATION processes take a set of means as given and focus on selecting between possible effects that can be created with that set of means’.
The thought of EFFECTUATION does not start with a specific goal; it usually starts with a number of available resources and allows goals happen contingently over time, based on the imagination and diverse aspirations of entrepreneurs and people with whom they interact, focusing organization constantly reinvent continuously. Provides useful design principles for transforming existing environments, generating new ones.
CAUSAL reasoning begins with the definition of a predetermined goals and obtaining and selecting the means to achieve it. It seeks to identify the best alternative (faster, cheaper, more efficient) to achieve the given goal. Here we consider and develop business plans, calculations of return on investment (ROI) and the decision to diversify the portfolio of the company. CAUSAL thinking is based on the explotation of existing knowledge to predict the environment in which the organization will evolve, providing useful decision criteria to achieve the objectives.
Causation models focus on maximizing the potencial returns for a decisión by selecting optimal strategies, such as the porter model in strategy emphasize detailed competitive analyses, the logic of the causation is to extent that we can predict the future we can control it.
From theory to practice:
Examples of Causal behaviour
a. Causal 1: Responding some routinary request about a standard procedure.
b. Causal 2: Hire care specialist staff for Emergency Patients in a Hospital, in order to improve the service to citizens.
c. Causal 3: Implement an office with new building materials in a given schedule.
Examples of Effectual behaviour
d. Effectual 1 (pilot int the plane): When starting a new export company, at the beginning I had doubts about the unknown market and consumers, but is in the actual field where I learned the hard way how to make decisions and taking real actions.
e. Effectual 2 (what if): Just recently, I’ve been invited out to visit a new facility in Trujillo, despite my unknown schedule, I decided to go and finally I did not only learnt many facts about my new business, I also made new business contacts.
f. Effectual 3 (bird in hand): Four years ago when finishing my college studies and before preparing my thesis, I did not know much about my field, instead I knew about social networks and design, so I decided to create a network of students which within the years have become a bigger networking of profesionals, and have developed into one my own consulting profesional businesses with great success.
The link between effectuation theory + blue ocean theory
A Blue Ocean is created when the company achieves value innovation that creates value simultaneously for both: the buyer and the company; while Effectuation is a set of decision-making principles that expert entrepreneurs are observed to employ in situations of uncertainty.
The relati
UNDERSTANDING ENTREPRENEURSHIP THROUGH ARTISTIC INTERVENTIONS
EFFECTUATION THEORY vs. CAUSATION By: Castaneda, Lorena lorenacastaneda@gmail.com ; Villavicencio, Jose Antonio jvillavicencio09@hotmail.com and Villaverde, Marcelino mvillaverdea@gmail.com (PERU). Ref: Saras D. Sarasvathy. Causation and eectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 2001. Proffesor: Dr Rita G. Klapper Expert entrepreneurs have taken actions in the field that have shaped into interesting companies, making decisions in a unknown near future, an inverse proceeding of the classical causational process. Still, they have learned how to take into advantage the unknowable and start their businesses with strong foundations. Causation rests on a logic of prediction - effectuation on the logic of control. UNIVERSIDAD DEL PACFICO INTERNATIONAL WEEK 2013 UNDERSTANDING ENTREPRENEURSHIP THROUGH ARTISTIC INTERVENTIONS
The thought of EFFECTUATION does not start with a specific goal; it usually starts with a number of available resources and allows goals happen contingently over time, based on the imagination and diverse aspirations of entrepreneurs and people with whom they interact, focusing organization constantly reinvent continuously. Provides useful design principles for transforming existing environments, generating new ones. CAUSAL reasoning begins with the definition of a predetermined goals and obtaining and selecting the means to achieve it. It seeks to identify the best alternative (faster, cheaper, more efficient) to achieve the given goal. Here we consider and develop business plans, calculations of return on investment (ROI) and the decision to diversify the portfolio of the company. CAUSAL thinking is based on the explotation of existing knowledge to predict the environment in which the organization will evolve, providing useful decision criteria to achieve the objectives. Causation models focus on maximizing the potencial returns for a decisin by selecting optimal strategies, such as the porter model in strategy emphasize detailed competitive analyses, the logic of the causation is to extent that we can predict the future we can control it.
a. Causal 1: Responding some routinary request about a standard procedure. b. Causal 2: Hire care specialist staff for Emergency Patients in a Hospital, in order to improve the service to citizens. c. Causal 3: Implement an office with new building materials in a given schedule. d. Effectual 1 (pilot int the plane): When starting a new export company, at the beginning I had doubts about the unknown market and consumers, but is in the actual field where I learned the hard way how to make decisions and taking real actions. e. Effectual 2 (what if): Just recently, Ive been invited out to visit a new facility in Trujillo, despite my unknown schedule, I decided to go and finally I did not UNIVERSIDAD DEL PACFICO INTERNATIONAL WEEK 2013 UNDERSTANDING ENTREPRENEURSHIP THROUGH ARTISTIC INTERVENTIONS
only learnt many facts about my new business, I also made new business contacts. f. Effectual 3 (bird in hand): Four years ago when finishing my college studies and before preparing my thesis, I did not know much about my field, instead I knew about social networks and design, so I decided to create a network of students which within the years have become a bigger networking of profesionals, and have developed into one my own consulting profesional businesses with great success.
A Blue Ocean is created when the company achieves value innovation that creates value simultaneously for both: the buyer and the company; while Effectuation is a set of decision-making principles that expert entrepreneurs are observed to employ in situations of uncertainty. The relationship between Effectuation and Blue Ocean theory, is that the theory of effectuation seeks to leverage the resources available to undertake any enterprise initiative, while the Blue Ocean, seeks to find new markets and new niches for existing markets, the cornerstone is value innovation. Both theories are complementary and support entrepreneurship.
Zetter L., Lobbying The Art of Political Persuasion, Petersfield, Hampshire, Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne Et D'irlande Du Nord, Harriman House, 2014, xxx+560 P.
WINNER OF THE SHANGHAI WORLD EXPO 2010 - INTERNATIONAL BAMBOO PRODUCT IDEAS COMPETITION - 1st Prize in The Clothing Category - ECO SANDALS by Ricardo Garcia Garayar