1

2
3
[TYPE THE COMPANY NAME]
[Year]
[Type the document
title]
[Type the document subtitle]
HP7800
[ T Y P E T H E C O M P A N Y A D D R E S S ]

P
a
g
e
2

4
Tanach is the Jewish Bible Or Jewish Canon. It is not Old Covenant or Old Teatament. In fact the 5
Greek translations like Septuagint[LXX],Version of Auuilla,Version ofTheodotion,Version Of 6
Symmachus etc. Were never called as Old Covenant or Old Testament. It was fairly late that post 7
Iesous Cannon was established and after it was compiled it still took a long period to Tanach or 8
its Greek versions as OLD COVENANT OR OLD TESTAMENT.It may be interesting to note that 9
even Syriac [Aramaic ] Verson was not known as Old or New Testament or Covenant. 10
The Hebrew word for Covenant is Brit [tirB]No where in Hebrew Tanach it is called OLD 11
Covenant Or Old Testament.In is very interesting to note down that even in the books of New 12
Testament ,the word Old Testament or Old Covenant is mensioned for HEBRAIC TANACH. 13
Even Iesous Himself never called the books of Hebraic Tanach as OLD COVENANT or 14
OLD TESTAMENT.That is why a number of people in Christianity are compelled to 15
think that the post esous Scriptures and Ante Iesous SCRIPTURES ARE TWO BOOKS 16
and not a single book of two parts namely OC or OT and NC or NT. So if the word 17
Bible may be used for each of them them then there are two Bibles .If the word Bible 18
is confined to Tanach and Its Translations then there tre two Holy Books in 19
Christianity, namely Bible and NT.[ If Iesous The ultimate Founder Of Christianity 20
did not call Hebraic Books Of Hebraic Cannon as old Testament or Old Covenant 21
then it is to say some thing which even Iesous did not say in his entire ministery.Not 22
only Iesous but non of his disciples ever call tis Non Biblical Term s of OT or OC. So 23
it is cincorrect to use this term even according to New - Testamental standard.] 24
Words of timeless GOD never grow old and are perpetually not old. 25
Other wise the New Testament may be termed as TWO THOUSAND YEARS OLD 26
TESTAMENT, or some 1700 years old but still new testament. 27
Athanasian Christianity believes that the belief of Athanasian Trinity is found in 28
Hebraic Bible. It is constantly attempted to prove Athanasian Trinity from the text of 29
A
DISCUSION
ON
THE TEXT
OF TANACH

P
a
g
e
3

Tanach and Lxx. A n example is Isaiah 9 where the word FATHER is used to apply on 30
Iesous who is not father even from the standard of Athanasian Christianity. 31
An other example is of the Proper Noun Ammanuel, which was not a noun of 32
Iesous.There is no rule that the literal meanking of a proper noun may be used to 33
apply aProper Noun On a Person.Yet it is do so. Genesis is also used to shew that 34
God is a trinity. 35
36
There are three most misused verses in Genesis which are constantly being misused by 37
A thenasianism in an attempt to prove the Dogma Of Trinity Of God. 38
These verse do not prove trinity. It is discussed in some detain since Athanasianism rejects all 39
the Jewish Commentaries in a single stroke. In this section there will be a critical study of 40
The book [ tiSarB ] Read from right to left/ 41
AND THE GOD SAID , << LET US MAKE MAN IN OUR 42
IMAGE>>[Genesis -26] 43
The Hebraic TEXT in PURE LATIN ALPHABETS and Letters is as 44
follow: 45
46
47
vN tvmD C vN mlsS C mdA hsN mihvlA 48
rmaI V 49
<<........ARROW OF DIRECTION.................<< 50
WARNING. DO NOT TRY TO READ THE HOLY TEXT 51
FROM LEFT TO RIGHT. OTHER WISE IT WILL BE A 52
DISGRACE TO THE HOLY TEXT. 53
[Hebrew Text in PURE Latin Alphabets written 54
from right to left, with out vewels. I is used for J or 55
Y,Vis used for U and W,C is used for K .The first 56

P
a
g
e
4

letter of each word is a Capital Letter and rest of 57
the letters of each word are in Small letters. Letter 58
A for Aleph,V for Vau, for Ain sS for Sde etc. ] 59
ATTENTION. Any error is writing Hebraic Text in 60
Pure Latin Alphabets is purely accidental. For more 61
accuracy one is advised to consult a Tanach in 62
Hebrew. 63
This is the most problematic verse Of Genesis Of Torah [ PETENTIUCH ] of Jewish Tanch and 64
Christian OLD COVENENT [OC/ OT]. Athenisian Christians try to provr the Dogma Of Trinity Of 65
Triune God From this verse. 66
But this verse does not prove this Dogma in the least sense . 67
There are some obvious mistakes in its translations in different languages. 68
They are discussed in several priliminaries. 69
FIRST PRE MILINARY 70
The following are the most obvious mistakes in a number of translations. 71
A] The word said is an incorrect translation. It should be Ordered or Commanded.Since the 72
Hebrew word IAMR means Command or Order. 73
Why this is translated as SAID instead of ORDERED or COMMANDED is very obvious. GOD CAN 74
NOT BE COMMANDED AND THIS EXPLODES arguments in favour of Dogma Of Trinity. 75
B] The word MAN is once again most fatal mistake in the alleged translations. The Hebrew Text 76
contains the word ADAM , and not the Word MAN . Why Athanasian Christianity has 77
rejected the Proper Noun ADAM in these translations and subtituted the Common Noun MAN in 78
place of It. The answer is once again quite simple.[1] 79
Adam is an Individual Human Person , and is not a Human Trinity. If God is a Divine Trinity then 80
Adam Must be a Human Trinity. Thus to hide this problem the The Proper Knoun Adam is 81
changed by a Common Noun MAN. 82
C] INOUR IMAGE is once again an incorrect translation. First the Hebrew word S-L-M means 83
SHADOW OR PROJECTION. 84
It does not mean IMAGE. To translate SHADOW as IMAGE is just to force Genesis to be in 85
Harmony with the ATHANASIAN COMMENTARIES OF YOHONNON OF NT/NC. 86
So once more one must neglect this and take the original meaning OF SHADOW. 87

P
a
g
e
5

Also the preposition IN is an incorrect TRANSLATION. The most appropriate translation is 88
FROM and Not In. 89
This means ADAM WAS MADE FROM SHADOW OF GOD, ADAM WAS NOT MADE IN THE IMAGE 90
OF GOD/G-D./ 91
As the word Shadow explodes trinitical interpretations of this verse of Genesis Of Torah Of 92
Tanach, ATHANASIAN CHRISTIANS TRIED TO TRANSLATE IT BY THE WORD image, and instead 93
of using the word FROM as the most appropriate Preposition in the translation deliberately 94
used the preposition IN. 95
D] One of the worst translations is the translation # IN OUR LIKENESS#. 96
The Hebrew word is DUMUS which means FIGURE,SHAPE, FORM etc. 97
The word Cu preceeds it. So the word become Cu-Dumus. 98
It means LIKE OUR FIGURE or Like Our Shape, Or Like Our Form , Or In likeness of [Our] Figure 99
etc.. 100
NOW THE TRANSATION BECOMES AS FOLLOW: 101
AND GOD COMMANDED, LET US MAKE ADAM FROM OUR SHADOW ,LIKE OUR FIGURE/FORM. 102
Second premilinary. 103
THERE ARE MORE PROBLEMS IN THE hEBREW Non Bebrew translations. 104
They maybe discussed below. 105
A] The problem of self imperative sentences. 106
In a large number of languages an IMPERATIVE SENTENCE or an Imperative Verb 107
is used for the second Person and not for the first person and the third person. 108
But in Hebrew an imperative sentence may be for the first or third persons as 109
well. 110
This generates a problem in translation and makes translations misguiding. 111
The Hebrew word N--S-H It is a self imperative VERB in the Hebraic 112
sentence. That is a Peson orders Hnself.A thing which is not found in most of the 113
languages. So they are forced to translate as Les Us [In the case of First Person 114
Imperative sentence] or LET HIM OR LET THEM [In the case of third person 115
imperative sentences]. But hese attempts make ambiguities which are used by 116
ATHANASIANISM. 117
In order to convey the actual meaning one may take some liberty from interliner 118
translations. 119

P
a
g
e
6

A more accurate translation in regard to sense of the Original Hebraic Text is as 120
follow. 121
AND THE GOD COMMANDED [ HIMSELF] MAKE ADAM FROM OUR SHADOW LIKE [ 122
OUR] FIGURE/FORM. N--S-H is a self commanding verb in plural. But As GOD CAN 123
NOT BE COMMANDED IT IS JUST A METAPHOR and not a word in real meaning of 124
the word. [ This is perhaps the best way to convey the Idea of a Self IMPERATIVE 125
SENTENCE, YET IT IS NOT AN INTERLINER TRANSLATION.] A more accurate 126
literal meaning may be conveyed by the following translation. 127
AND THE GODS COMMANDED [ THEMSELVES] MAKE ADAM FROM OUR SHADOW 128
LIKE [ OUR] FIGURE/FORM, 129
But although the word Alohem literally means GODS [] PLURAL[], IT IT MEANS A 130
SINGLE GOD AS A PLURAL IN FORM OF WORD AND SINGULAR IN MEANING 131
KNOWN AS PLURAL OF MAJESTY MAJESTY, OR A MAJESTIC SINGULAR. 132
SIMILARLY THE WORD NAS H IS A PLURAL OF MAJESTY . THE ONLY 133
DIFFERENCE IS THAT THE FORMER WORD IS A NOUN AND THE LATTER WORD IS 134
A VERB. 135
136
Even from the trinitical point of view Logos is God and God can not be 137
commanded by First or third Hypostases. Even the Trinitical Being cannot 138
command any one of the Hypostases residing in its Ousia 139
[SUBSTANCE/GODHEAD]. 140
So even upon the standard of Trinitical Dogmas it is use of a word not in the real 141
meaning but in the virtual / unreal meaning. 142
But if some one insists that TRIUNE GOD ORDERS ALL THOSE HYPOSTASES 143
WHICH RESIDE IN THE OUISA OF THE TRIUNE GOD even then he must have to 144
accept that as Each Supreme Hypostasis Is God , None of them can be 145
commanded neither by the Trinitical God or Triune God Or God the Trinity Nor by 146
any one of the CO-HYPOSTASES dwelling jointly in the Ousia of the Triune God Or 147
Trinity. So he must have to confess that this WORD is in a Virtual meaning , 148
instead of the real meaning of the word. 149
If virtual then not real and thus the dispute is just upon the two virtual meanings 150
of a given word, and if so then at least neither of them can be certain , and if none 151
of then are certain then no argument can be made from uncertain alternatives. 152
Now translate the original sense as God Ordered themselves or God Order 153
Himself, each meaning is just a virtual meaning. 154
THIRD PREMILINARY 155

P
a
g
e
7

THE WORD ELOHEM AND ITS MEANING 156
The Hebraic word Elohem [ mihvlA] [ Read the Holy 157
words from right to left] is a plural of words Elah [hlA]or Eloah 158
[hvlA]. The Word Eloah or Elah means God or god or deity. 159
Consequently the plural of them means Gods or gods or deities. 160
Thus the words Eloah or Elah means God or god, amd the word Elohem means 161
Gods or gods. 162
In the real and literal meaning the word ELOHEM can not be used for the Supreme 163
Being o f Tanakh and the Supreme Being of O.C. 164
Since both believe in just One God and not in more then one Gods. 165
And the word ELOHEM does not mean God or god but GODS or gods in its literal 166
meaning. 167
From Jewish point of view GOD is UnoUnity or Mono Unity , that is only One 168
Hypostatic Person In Godhead. The same is tue from the point of view of Unitarian 169
Christianity and Arian ChristianitFrom Trinitical point of view there is Only One 170
God Who is a Triune God and a Trinity. 171
Therefore this God cannot be called GODS or gods . The plurality of Hypostases 172
in the Divine Ousia [Substance]Of Supreme Being does not allow the words Gods 173
and gods for the Supreme Being./ One even can not say Divine hypostases are 174
Gods/ gods , according to the Dogma Of Trinity Of God. 175
So the word Elohem can not be used for the Supreme Being or the 176
Hypostases in the Ousia Of The Supreme Being [Godhead], and additionally not for 177
the collection of them if the word Elohem means Gods or gods. 178
If the word Elohem does not mean Gods or gods, then it means God or 179
god [Plural Of Majesty and Singular in meaning].In this case it does not imply any 180
plurality of Hypostases in the Ousia Of the Supreme Being. Since it only means 181
God or god [That is the form of the word is plural yet its meaning is 182
singular.Unfortunately there is no analogue in English. It may be understood just 183
by a supposed example. Suppose that the word BOOKS which is the plural of the 184
word Book is used for a Single Majestic Book.Now the word BOOK does not mean 185
its Real meaning , the plural Of the word Book, but it means book, plural in form 186
and singular in MEANING.]. The words God and god does not imply plurality of 187
Hypostases in the given singular form. The entire discussion in the support of the 188
Dogma Of Trinity is based on scriptural verses and not on the singular form of the 189
word God or god. 190

P
a
g
e
8

So if the word Elohem means God or god it does not imply any plurality of Divine 191
Hypostatic Persons in the Divine Ousia [Godhead] Of the Supreme Being [God]. 192
Thus the word Elohem has just the following possibilities. 193
A] The word Elohem means God or god. 194
This is the real and primary meaning of the word.[Plural] 195
B]The word Elohem means Gods or gods. This is the secondary meaning of the 196
word.[Singular] 197
C] It means neither of these two meanings[ i.e neither plural nor singular] . 198
In the first sense it is not useable to God Of Hebraic Scriptures. 199
In the second sense it doesnot imply any plurality of Hypostases in the Divine 200
Ousia [namely Godhead[ If it still implies some sort of plurality of Hypostases and 201
Hypostatic Plurality in the Divine Ousia then it is neither in the first meaning nor 202
in the second meaning. 203
Assuming that the first is the regular meaning and second is the irregular 204
meaning then the third is the unique meaning which is neither regular nor 205
irregular but only one of its kind. Word singular in meaning yet implying plurality 206
of Supreme Hypostases in the Ousia Of Its Grammatical and literal Subject i.e The 207
Supreme Being. How ever such type of word was not known before the foundation 208
of Athanasian Christianity. 209
Now we render some more possible translation of the verse . 210
AND GODS COMMANDED [THEMSELVES] ,<< MAKE ADAM FROM [OUR] SHADOW 211
IN LIKENESS OF OUR FIGURE/FORM/] 212
This meaning is incorrect even according to Dogma of Trinity since the Words 213
Gods and gods are not allowed to use for the Supreme Being or for the 214
Hypostases dwelling inside the Ousia Of The Supreme Being. So replacing the 215
word Gods by the word Elohem does not make the meaning correct if the word 216
Elohem is used in the meaning of the word Gods or gods. 217
If the word Elohem is used in the meaning of the word God or god then the word 218
is not in the plural meaning and it does not imply plurality and multiplicity of 219
Supreme Hypostases in the Ousia Of The Supreme Being.All the Hebraic 220
Lexitonists, Grammarians and Scripturists never thought of implication of 221
plurality of hypostasis in the Ousia Of God while using this word for God . 222
This is a sufficient proof that to claim that it still imply plurality of hypostases 223
inside the Divine Ousia even when it is not used as a Plural is a latter openion . 224
One may reject the latter opinion and prefer the former opinion . 225

P
a
g
e
9

SIXTH PRIMILINARY 226
THE HEBRAIC WORD IAMAR is usually translated is SAID instead of commanded. 227
It amy be translated on the demand of context as said. But its actual meaning is 228
Commanded. 229
It may be the case that more number of places may be translated as SAID,yet thre 230
must be a demand of context to translate it as such. It does not depend upon the 231
majority or minority of cases but it depend upon the context. If there are more 232
number of cases where the word is demanded to mean SAID by the context, and less 233
number of cases where there is no such demand by the context , then it may be 234
translated as SAID on the demands not because because of the greater number of 235
demands. I f there is no such demand from the context then it must be translated 236
as COMMANDED OR COMMAND, SINCE A SHIFT IN MEANING FROM REAL TO 237
VERTUAL DOES NOT DEPEND UPON THE MAJORITY OF CASES BUT UPON THE 238
DEMANDS, AND THE INDICATIONS OF CONTEXTS, ANS SOME TIME EXTERNAL 239
INDICATIONS AS WELL. The principle and rule of demands and indications are 240
independent of majority or minority. This is the key point which must be kept in 241
mind. So it is incorrect to argue that a greater number of cases demand that it 242
must be translated as SAID, then this means that every thing has become 243
TOPSYTERVY , .This is incorrect. The rule is that is thre is only one place where 244
there is no demand and thousand of places where there are demands, even then 245
the PRINCIPLE is immutable . 246
SEVENTH PREMILINARY 247
If one delete all the prepositions and try to translate with out prepositions one 248
may get a more pure meaning. 249
And Ordered Elohem [Himself] Make Adam Like Our Shadow, Like Our 250
figure. 251
The Hebraic word Dumus may be translates as Form but it can be easily confused 252
with the Theological term Form which is Nothing But the Ousia Of Divine Supreme 253
Being in theological Discussions about Supreme Being. Hebraic Text are confined to the 254
meanings of Hebrew Language whether Real or Virtual. 255
8
th
Preliminary. 256
They word Elohem does not prove the Dogma Of Trinity, and does not imply any 257
type of Plurality. One of the simplest proof is as follow. 258
This proof is directly followed from the word Elohem. 259
If the Dogma Of Trinity is true then each and every Hypostasis dwelling in the 260
Divine Ousia [Namely Godhead] Is God , say Logos is God. 261

P
a
g
e
1
0

Now the question is. 262
Is Logos Elohem.? 263
If Logos is NOT then Logos is not GOD. This contradicts the Dogma Of Trinity. 264
If Logos is, the Logos is Itself A Trinity and a Triune God. This is against the 265
Dogma Of Trinity To believe that Some Hypostases [atleast one] in Triune God are 266
Trinities.Thus the dogma of Trinity it self implies that the word Elohem can not be 267
used as a plural word implying plurality of Hypostases in Divine Ousia or in any 268
one of the Hypostasis. That is PERHAPS ONE OF THE REASONS ,that a number of 269
protestants also agree that the word ELOHEM is just a Plural of Majesty. 270
CONCLUSION 271
The word Elohem is used as a singular and if it is used as a singular it loses any 272
type of plurality. To claim that it still implies a sort of plurality say the plurality of 273
Supreme Hypostases in the Divine Ousia Of the Divine Being is a latter invention. 274
No Hebraic scholar from the day Hebraic Genesis was written to the advent of 275
Athanasian Christianity ever consider this type of strange plural-singular 276
amalgam. Even if God is a Trinity and not a unoUnity or MonoUnity , the word 277
Elohen when used as a singular loses any implication to the plurality of 278
Hypostases in the Ousia Of Supreme Being, and if used as a Plural Implies 279
Plurality of Divine Beings ,not just Plurality Of Hypostases. Even if there are 280
thousans of Hypostases In Divine Ousia it can not be used in its Plural 281
meaningsince in this case it means nothing but Gods or gods ,and these words I.E 282
Gods and gods can not be used for The Supreme Being even if there are 283
thousands of mutually distinct and incommunicable Divine hypostases in the 284
Divine Ousia Of Divine Being. Thus this verse does not proves trinity in the least 285
meaning. 286
Objection1. 287
Use of plural of Majesty is an irregular case of Hebrew language. It is incorrect to 288
prefer an irregular case when it is possible to take a word regular case. 289
Answer . 290
A] It is incorrect to reject a case just because it is irregular , since irregulars also 291
exist. How ever the uses of some irregulars are regulars for certain grammatical 292
things. Elohem has been a regular case for a God Of Judaism since ages. 293
No one ever claimed to be irregular for GOD. 294
It is very strange to claim that all he Hebraic Prophets and all the authors of 295
Hebraic Scriptures used this irregular word with out knowing that it implies 296
plurality of Hypostases in the Ousia Of Elohem. If they had the slightest doubt 297

P
a
g
e
1
1

they would have never used this word for the GOD OF JUDAISM since they did not 298
believed in the hypostatic plurality in the Ousia Of Elohem Of Judaism 299
B] If this is an Irregular case then the Christological use of A SINGULAR 300
IMPLYING THE PLURALITY IN THE OUSIA IS THE UNIQUE CASE OR A PLURAL 301
ONLY IMPLYING THE HYPOSTATIC PLURALITY IN THE OUSIA 302
Is the Unique case of Hebrew language. It is then neither regular nor irregular but 303
purely unique . And if so then even an irregular case is far more preferable then 304
the alleged this case . 305
C] It is strange to see that if it is a real plural and not a plural of Majesty then it 306
does not mean GODS . IF ELOHEM DOES NOT MEANS gods TRHEN IT IS NOT A 307
PLUTRAL AT ALL, irrespective of the alleged implication of Hyposatatic Plurality 308
in the Ousia Of the Subject of the word ELOHEM. 309
OBJECTION 2 310
There is a plurality in singularity and if so then the plural form of a word is 311
useable. 312
Answer. 313
If so then one can use the word GODS for this plurality but The Dogma Of Trinity 314
Does not allow to do so even for this case. Are we to assume that there are a 315
number of GODS in regared to the alleged plurality and only one GOD in regard to 316
singularity.One is not allowed to claim that there are more then one GOD in 317
regard to hypostatic plurality and only one GOD in regard to Osiaic Singularity. 318
If not then then the word ELOHEM does not make any exception. 319
Since it either means GOD if it is a Plural Of Majesty, and it means GODS if it 320
means A real Plural. 321
One Elohem means One God since the word Elohem means God or godif it is 322
singular in meaning [Plural Of Majesty]. 323
One Elohem means One Gods, if it is a Real Plura [Plural Of Number ] 324
But this meaning is incorrect even if the Dogma Of Trinity is correct.If 325
Dogma Of Trinity Does not allow the use Of the plural Of God or god for the 326
Trinitical Plurality Of Hypostases, the same is true for the WORD ELOHEM if it 327
means GODS. 328
If this does not mean Gods or gods then it only means God or god with out any 329
Implication to the stated above Plurality.[2] 330

P
a
g
e
1
2

aaa 331
332
FOOT NOTES; 333
[1] THERE FORE THE TRANSLATRIONS AND THE GOD SAID , << LET US MAKE ADAM IN 334
OUR IMAGE>> IS A BETTER TRANSLATION THAN ,, AND THE GOD SAID , << LET US MAKE 335
MAN IN OUR IMAGE>> .It must be noted than the noun ADM Must be taken as a proper noun 336
unless and otherwise it becomes imperative to take it as a common noun in its literal 337
meaning.To translate is as as Man is incorrect unless and other wise three is some 338
impossibilities [atleast one]in the text. 339
[2]The root of the word Elohem is Elah,[ ] and ELOAH is a derivative of Elah. The 340
word ELOHEM [ELOAHEM] is a plural of the word Eloah. 341
This word is used in Hebraic Tanach for Angels ,Kings, Judges, Chiefs and even false Gods./gods. 342
In Exodus,it is used for Moshe [Moses]. This is sufficient to that the word when used as a 343
singular implies only one person as in the case of Moses [hsM].This word does not imply any 344
sort of plurality if it is used as a singular.If the author of Genesis ever comes to know what 345
arguments are made from his simple texs which he has authored he would be the most 346
surprised person in the entire history of authors of religious scriptures. 347
Notes@ Pure Latin Alphabets are: ABCDEFGHILMNOPQRSTVX 348
All the other Alphabets are Latin Extended Alphabets with subdivisions. 349
Hemi Latin Alphabets are: KUY, K and Y were geneally used to write Greek word with KAPPA or 350
Upsilon. 351
352
Non Latin Alphabets are: JW 353
Special Non Latin Alphabet Z 354
Note. It is very likely that the famous space research centre NASA is the Aericanized form of 355
Hebraic Ns-h stated above. That is the words are so selected that there abbreviation 356
becomes Amaricanized form of Genesic N-S-H 357
END OF PART ONE. 358
PART TWO: 359
And the LORD GOD Said, the man has become one of us , ... 360
The Hebraic TEXT in PURE LATIN ALPHABETS and Letters is as 361
follow: 362

P
a
g
e
1
3

363
364
365
[ Gen-22] 366
...vnmM dhaC hiH mdA H mihlA HVHI rmI V 367
<<........ARROW OF DIRECTION.................<< 368
WARNING. DO NOT TRY TO READ THE HOLY TEXT 369
FROM LEFT TO RIGHT. OTHER WISE IT WILL BE A 370
DISGRACE TO THE HOLY TEXT. 371
[Hebrew Text in PURE Latin Alphabets written 372
from right to left, with out vewels. I is used for J or 373
Y,Vis used for U and W,C is used for K .The first 374
letter of each word is a Capital Letter and rest of 375
the letters of each word are in Small letters. Letter 376
A for Aleph,V for Vau, for Ain sS for Sde etc. ] 377
ATTENTION. Any error is writing Hebraic Text AND 378
IN in Pure Latin Alphabets is purely accidental. For 379
more accuracy one is advised to consult a Tanach 380
in Hebrew. 381
382
383
This is another verse which is used for proving the Dogma Of Trinity. But once 384
again this verse neither does prove Trinity nor can prove DOGMA OF Trinity. 385

P
a
g
e
1
4

FIRST PREMILINARY 386
The word said is once again a mistranslation. It should be Ordered or 387
Commanded. 388
And Lord GOD Commanded is a better rather correct translation of Hebraic 389
words. Similarly the word in Hebrew Text is Hv ADAM [mdA vH] and not 390
man [rsB]. God knows why the noun ADAN is changed by the word Man and what 391
are the motives behind this manupolation. We do suggest a number of reasons but 392
a detail discussion is beyond the scope of present topic.He ADAM do emphasise 393
ADAM.If GOD Hd used the word it would be correct to translate it by the word 394
MAN, but,God Has Used the word ADAM and this is a Proper Noun . It 395
must be adopted in translation as ADAM . 396
The word is used in Genesis eg Gen-6-3.It may be noted that the word 397
ASAM may only be translated as man WHEN taking it as Adam contradicteth 398
Hebraic Tanach. Only in this condition one can argue that the word ADAM is 399
used as a Petaphorical Symbol Of Mankind. Once again it is independent of 400
majority or minority of cases. 401
Please Keep it in mind once for all times that if the condition is present in a greater 402
number of cases and the very same condition is absent in less number of cases, this 403
does not changes the principle or rule.. 404
405
406
Second PRIMILINARY: 407
The Hebraic word MIMMANU is translated as One Of Us. This is the Grammatical 408
First Person Translation. It should be translated as a Grammatical Third Person 409
Translation. Eg Like One Of Them Or One Among them, Or Unparrallel among 410
them etc.There are atleast 27 places in Hebraic Bible where this word is 411
translated as a Third Person translation instead of First Person translation.In such 412
places it is not allowed to translate it is the first person translation. One or two 413
places are such that there is a possibility of both types of translation. But neither 414
of them are certain. Even the Most probable is certainly Not Certain. In matter of 415
believes a certain translation is required not an uncertain translation. 416

P
a
g
e
1
5

So this verse can neither prove trinity nor this prove trinity on the basis of choice 417
of translations. since even the most probable translation is not certain,and 418
necessary condition to prove a Dogma whether the Dogma OF UNITARIANITY 419
[Mono-Unity/UNI-UNITY] or Trinity] is certainiity which is not 420
fulfiied and not satisfied. 421
422
THIRD PREMILINARY: 423
The word MIMMANU is a compound word formed by the combination of 424
two words a]Mn [nM]. B]H. [Vowels are omited] 425
If vovels are inserted then the word may be read as is Min and Hu respectively. 426
Mn and Hv 427
If joined they become MINHU [MNH]. [HnM] [[FROM RIGHT TO LFT] 428
A NUN nun was added to join them. It became Min-nahu [Mnnhv]. 429
[vhnnM] [[FROM RIGHT TO LFT] 430
431
Ha or h was changed by n so it become MIN-NA-NU [Mnnnv]. 432
[nvnnM] [[FROM RIGHT TO LFT] 433
434
First two Nuns were then changed by mem with a DAGISH. 435
So it changed into MIMMANU [Mmnv]. 436
[nvnM] [[FROM RIGHT TO LFT] 437
438
From the very origin it is a Grammatical Third Person Pronoun. 439
So the better and more accurate translation is as follow> 440
I] And the LORD GOD Said, HE ADAM has become one of THEM , to know good 441
and [Evil]. 442
443

P
a
g
e
1
6

444
Ii[And the LORD GOD Commanded, Now [behold] Adam has become one among 445
them , to know good and [Evil]. 446
III]AND IHVH GOD COMMANDED HE ADAM BECAME ONE OF THEM............ 447
IV] AND IHVH GOD [ GOD IHVH] COMMANDED , HE ADAM BECAME [DID BECOME ] 448
UNIQUE AMONG THEM...... 449
FOR THOSE WHO LIKE TO RECIEVE MORE HEBRAIC MEANING THE FOLLOWING 450
LESS ENGLISH TRANSLATION ARE PRESENTED. 451
V] AND IHVH GOD [ GOD IHVH] COMMANDED , HE ADAM BECAME DID BE ONE 452
OUT OF THOSE/ ONE OUT OF THAT............... 453
The word Behold is not present in HEBRAIC SENTENCE OF GENESIS. Yet one is 454
supposed to suppose it in sense while reading the text, or to add it in mind while 455
reading the text. How ever if some one does not it is equally correct sinse it is 456
optional, cont a compulsion.. 457
It may be noted that there are several plases in Tanach where this word is 458
used as third person pronoun. 459
460
FORTH PRIMILINARY 461
The Hebrew word Cahud[dhC] may be translated as Unique, One with 462
out Parrall,with out a partner, unparralle only one [among them ] , With Out A 463
Compeer.etc. 464
So a still better translation is as follow; 465
Lord Lord God Commanded [Some one].Now behold Adam is become with out a 466
compeer among them by having the Knowledge of Good and Bad [Evil]. 467
Onkelos explains it as IAHIDI. [ idihaI] 468
469
470
Fifth Premilinary. 471

P
a
g
e
1
7

If God is talking and conversing in a company of angels, supermundales, spiritual 472
and heavenly beings, cherubs, etc God can say One Of Us. 473
To claim that God can not include himself among heavenly Suppositums is like 474
the claim that God can not incarnate in Iesous to live among people. 475
God cansome how manifest among angles, and other heavenly rational 476
suppostums with or with out assuming their natures if He can incarnate in human 477
beings by assuming human nature to live among human beings. 478
So there may be some created and made persons and hypostases not in Divine 479
Ousia but out of Divine Ousia.Thus this cannot prove any type of plurality in Divine 480
Ousia. 481
To Claim that God cannot include Himself among Heavenly Rational Suppositums 482
sayAngelic Beings, Supermundales,Spiritual Beings,Spirits, cherubs etc.a claim 483
like <<God Cannot Assume Human Nature >>.S uch a claim that God Cannot 484
Assume Angelic Nature but can Assume human nature is like the claim that God 485
Cannot Assume Femail human Nature but Can Only Assume Male human Nature. 486
Obviously only a dogmatic mind can accept such strange claims. But a Rational 487
mind cannot accept such claims. What form of Christology is this that if it is 488
claimed << God Can incarnate to become a human and Can live among them for 489
Thirty Three years 490
[APPROXIMATELY] but can not Menisfest to become an angel or a Supermundale 491
by Assuming their Natures just for speaking some sentences. Obviously such a 492
Christology is unacceptable and CANNOT BE ACCEPTED. 493
Thus if it can be believed that God Can Incarnate and become a man by Assuming 494
a Human Nature and Can live among Humans for 33 years then such believers 495
cannotr deny That God Can also Menifest and become an Angle by assuming 496
Angelic Nature and Can live in trheir Companyfor some time atleast at the time of 497
speaking these words and sentences. 498
499
End OF Part Two. 500
Part Three 501
Let Us Go Down...........[Genesis-11-7] 502
503
504

P
a
g
e
1
8

505
vhR ptS siA vmsI aL dsA mtpS mS hlbN V hrdN bhH 506
<<........ARROW OF DIRECTION.................<< 507
WARNING. DO NOT TRY TO READ THE HOLY TEXT 508
FROM LEFT TO RIGHT. OTHER WISE IT WILL BE A 509
DISGRACE TO THE HOLY TEXT. 510
[Hebrew Text in PURE Latin Alphabets written 511
from right to left, with out vowels. I is used for J or 512
Y,Vis used for U and W,C is used for K .The first 513
letter of each word is a Capital Letter and rest of 514
the letters of each word are in Small letters. Letter 515
A for Aleph,V for Vau, for Ain sS for Sde etc. ] 516
ATTENTION. Any error is writing Hebraic Text in 517
Hebraic or in Pure Latin Alphabets is purely 518
accidental. For more accuracy one is advised to 519
consult a Tanach in Hebrew. 520
521
522
This verse is also used to prove Trinity from the Test Of Genesis Of Petentuch Of 523
Holy Tanach .It is argued that it is beyond angelic power 524
the change the minds of people, in a very short period of timeso that they are 525
compelled to change their languages , and two forget their mother tongues 526
instantly, all with out noticing what has happen to them. 527
Thus the only suggestion is that God spoke to all Hypostases inside His Ousia. 528
First Premilinary. 529

P
a
g
e
1
9

Hebrew wordHabaa is derived from Hebrew word Yihib.This means to Give, to put, 530
to place, to depart. 531
It is some times used as an Auxilry verb in order to shew motivation or it is used 532
to motivate for an act which is to be done. 533
It does not imply plurality of Hypostases in Divine Ousia Of Supreme Being. It may 534
be the case that God shew his Motivation by using this word and plural form is 535
just a Plural Of Majesty. So it only means Let Me Go or Let me Give Or Let me 536
Depart etc 537
Second Pemilinary. 538
If the word Haba conveys the sense of a Self Imperative Verb , then it must be 539
known thatno one can commoand God to do an Act. A self command is not a real 540
command in particular not a command for God. Thus this implies that the 541
sentence cannot be taken literally but figuratively or metaphorically.If even such 542
places of Jewish Tanach cannot be taken in Vertual sense then this means that 543
there is no Versr intire Bible which can be taken not Literally i.e figuratively or 544
metaphorically. 545
Athanasians become Literalist when they see literal approach supporst the 546
Dogma Of Trinity and Figuratists and Metaphorists if they find 547
figurative or metaphorical approach suppors their DOGMA. 548
THIRD PREMILINARY. 549
This interpretation does not matches with the Dogma which is suppposed to be 550
proved from this verse. A very strange case indeed. 551
There are only two possible cases if the Dogma Of Tinity is Assumed To Be True. 552
EITHER The TRIUNE GOD or GOD THE TRINITY is commanding all the Hypostases 553
Existing in the Divine Ousia Of The Triune Trinity or Any One Of The Hypostasis 554
living in the Divine Ousia Of TRIUNE GOD is commanding to the rest of neighbour 555
Hypostases dwelling in the same Ousia. 556
Dogma Of Trinity asserts that these Hypostases can talk and can converse with 557
each other and listen to each other if they will so. 558
But as each Hypostasis in the Divine Ousia Is God then no one can order or 559
command God. In both cases this verse can not be translated literally. 560
Thus this is not in real sense or meaning , but in vertual sense or meaning.So in 561
either case whether there is a Trinity or Uni-Unity the words of the verse are not 562
in the primery meaning. 563

P
a
g
e
2
0

If the word of the verse are not in their real meanings then the verse cannot be 564
used to disprove or to prove the Dogma Of Trinity. 565
Forth Premilinary. 566
It may be the case that God in the company of Angels and Super mundales 567
wanted to come down . That is he wanted to come down with them and not with 568
out them . If it ias argued that it is outb of Angelic and Supermundalic Powers to 569
change human minds and to delete their former languagess from their memories 570
and to write new languages in the memory of their minds and brains, it can ot 571
disprove this rendering of the verse. 572
Since it is one of the weak objections of polymics. 573
1] If God Is So Omnipotent then Gd Can Give Powers To Angels etc. to do so. 574
2] If this Omnipotent God Does not have Omnipotence to to Grant this sort of 575
power to Angels and Supermundfales, even then there are certain solutions to 576
this problem not necessarilyb the trinitical one. 577
1] It is evident from Hebraic Tanach renamed as Hebraic Bible and Grrek 578
Septuagint renamed as Old Covenant that Miracles are the WORKS and ACTS of 579
GOD EVEN IF THEY ARE SHOWN BY humaqn beings. So the act of changing the 580
language was actually the Act of GOD but was shown by Angels accomanying 581
GOD during his comming mensioned above. The word let us does shew and only 582
shew the Miracles performed by Angels and Supermundales who accompanied 583
GOD during the Descension Of GOD AND HEAVENLY BEINGS on the planet earth.. 584
2] This is some what theological interpretation of the verse. 585
In ATHANASIAN Christology it is said that the Human Nature Of Christ is not a 586
Person.This Human Nature is almost like a HUMAN PERSON yet it lacks some 587
thing so that it fails to be a Person. 588
Now Athanasian Christologists have debated since long what is the actual 589
difference between a Human Person and the Human Natrure Of Christr which falls 590
short of being a person. Ifnot a human person then this Human Nature stated 591
above is NOT a HUMAN BEING. IUt is still undecided what is the actual difference 592
between these two, and Athanasian Theologists anf Christologists are still 593
disputing . Yet one thing is certain if the Hypostatic Union ceases then the Human 594
Nature Of Christ will immediately upgrade to a human person consequently to a 595
human being. 596
bUT IF the Hypostatic Union is some how RESTORED the immediate 597
consequence is that the Upgraded human person shall immediately revert to the 598
Original Human Nature. 599

P
a
g
e
2
1

Thus we can say that the angels , Supermundales were United with God to form 600
Hypostatic Unions and in this process these Heavenly Persons and Suppositums 601
were reverted to Angelic and Supermundalic Natures. Now the plurality is just in 602
regard to non divine natures and unity is with respect to Divine Natures. 603
But after the Divine mission of changing the languages of humans the Hypostatic 604
Union ceased . A ll the Natures were restored to their respective Personalities 605
and persons, and SUPPOSITUMNESSES. 606
Thus what so ever done by angles is just like the Miracles appearently shewn by 607
the human nature of Iesous , even if the Human Natre did not have the power to 608
show any Miracle. 609
This is one of those places where Christology can be used against The Dogma Of 610
Trinity. 611
OBJECTION. 612
HYPOSTTIC UNION REQUIRES A HYPOSTASIS AND UNITARIANITY DISBELIEVES 613
IN HYPOSTASIS. 614
ANSWER. 615
The difference between Unitarianity abd Trinity is that Unitarianity believes in 616
only One Hypostasis in Godhead while Trinity believes in more that one hypostses 617
in Godhead. Although Unitarian sects like Bible Students, YAHVAH Wtnesses etc 618
do not mention the exact relation between Godhead and Hypostasis but it 619
appears that the only difference between them is on the number of Hypostases in 620
GODHEAD.Since they reject the plurality of Hypostaticm Persons in Divine Ousia 621
[Godhead] but this does not mean that they reject he singularity Of Hypostses 622
and Hypostatic Persons in the GODHEAD. Rationally if an Unitarian sect what so 623
ever it may be have the following options. 624
1] Either It believe that there is only one Hypostasis in Divine Ousia or it believe 625
that God is a Hypostasis with out any Ousia, or it believe that OUSIA is in 626
Hypostasis. 627
If It is believed that Ousia is in the Hypostasis , then or Hypostasis is in the Ousia 628
then such a Hypostatic Union is possible. It is incorrect to claim that if there are 629
more then Hypostases in the Divine Ousia then any one of the Hypostasis can 630
form a hypostatic union anf if there is only one hypostasis then this hypostasis 631
can not form a hypostatic union. Such a claim is irrational and self reasoned. 632
If it is believed that God is a HYPOSTASIS WITH OUT AN OUSIA then such a claim 633
may not be accepted. But even then the ability of a Hypostasis to form a 634
Hypostatic union doee not depend on the existence or non existence of 635

P
a
g
e
2
2

Ousia.How ever I personally Opine thatr there can be NO HYPOSTASIS IF THERE 636
IS NO OUSIA. in the case if there is ONLY ONE HYPOSTASIS in the DIVINE OUSIA 637
[Renamed as Godhead for convinence] Then the Ousia is not Distinct From the 638
Only Hypostsis which is in it or in which it is or both, and Ousia is Highly 639
communicable to the Only Hypostasis. But Ousia is not the Hypostasis since it 640
is so communicable to the Only Hypiostasis that it does not exist apart from the 641
Hypopstasis even if it is Per se subsistent. 642
Any how Trinity can not be proved. This interpretation nullify the arguments in 643
supoprt of trinity. 644
Even the minutest possibility of this interpretation breaks all the arguments from 645
this verse in support of trinity ones for all. 646
647
648
Notes.There are a number of places in Genesis where the Hebrew text says God 649
Commanded, and it is translated as GOD SAID. 650
tHE FAMOUS VERSE . And THE GOD SAID LET THERE BE LIGHT MAY ALSO BE 651
TRANSLATED AS 652
653
654
rvA ihI V rvA ihI mihlA rmaI V 655
WARNING. DO NOT TRY TO READ THE HOLY TEXT FROM LEFT TO RIGHT. OTHER WISE IT WILL BE A DISGRACE TO 656
THE HOLY TEXT. 657
658
AND THE GOD COMMANDED ,' LET THERE BE LIGHT';. 659
Or more simply and more correctly 660
And God Commanded. Be [ O] Light, AND LIGHT BECAME. 661
The sense of the sentence may be manifested in English as follow. 662
And God commanded, EXIST [O] LIGHT AND LIGHT EXISTED. 663

P
a
g
e
2
3

The word O in translation does not exit in HEBRAIC TEXT. One must omit it if he wants 664
to be more Hebraic. That is why they are written in squire brackets. Omitting them gives 665
translations like these given below: 666
And God commanded, EXIST , LIGHT AND LIGHT EXISTED 667
OR 668
And God commanded, BE , LIGHT AND LIGHT DID BE 669
OR 670
And God commanded, BE , LIGHT AND LIGHT BECAME. 671
672
673
674
675
676
One may see that such a constant distortion of Hebraic senses and meanings can 677
not be unintentionally. 678
There must be some motive and some mission behind it. Even if it can be 679
translated as said instead of commanded, even then it is never informed that an 680
other translation is possible. 681
The translation Let There be light is according to Trinitical Approach, that is GOD 682
is saying to some one that he may let the light to become [or to exist.]But there is 683
no Let there be but Be , Avery direct command , with out the letting of any one 684
else, ruling out any possibility of saying to any hypothetical Hypostasis in the 685
Ousia Of the Sayer. 686
A similar game is played in Yohanon when no translator informs in general that 687
the Greek word LOGOS may also be translated as Reason. 688
Since to translate as In the bigening was the Reason, and Reason Was With the 689
God, AND The Reason was [the] God , DOES SHAKES THE OLD CONCEPT 690
conceived in minds by translations like In the Begging was the word. 691
END OF PART THREE 692
Part four. 693

P
a
g
e
2
4

AND EARTH WAS WITOUT FORM AND VOID< AND DARKNESS WAS UPON THA FACE OF DEEP 694
[WATER] 695
. AND SPIRIT OF GOD WAS MOVING/ BLOWING TO AND FRO. 696
[GENESIS -1-2] 697
This verse is deliberately translated incorrect in order to shew that the 698
Mentioned Spirit is the Third Hypostasis in the Ousia of Triune GOD of Trinity.] 699
THE HEBRAIC TEXT IN HEBREW AND PURE LATIN ALPHABETS AND LETTERS IS 700
AS FOLLOW.. 701
............................................ 702
703
704
705
Mim H inP lA tphrM mihlA hVR V mvhT inP lA xshH V vhB V vhS htiH ssrA.H V 706
<<........ARROW OF DIRECTION.................<< 707
WARNING. DO NOT TRY TO READ THE HOLY TEXT 708
FROM LEFT TO RIGHT. OTHER WISE IT WILL BE A 709
DISGRACE TO THE HOLY TEXT. 710
[Hebrew Text in PURE Latin Alphabets written from right to left, with out vowels. 711
I is used for J or Y,Vis used for U and W,C is used for K .The first letter of each 712
word is a Capital Letter and rest of the letters of each word are in Small letters. 713
Letter A for Aleph,V for Vau, for Ain sS/ss for Sde etc. ] 714
ATTENTION. Any error is writing Hebraic Text in Pure Latin Alphabets is purely 715
accidental. For more accuracy one is advised to consult a Tanach in Hebrew. 716
717
THE ACTUAL TRANSLATION. 718
AND THE EARTH [ARS] WAS NOT INHABITENT AND EMPTY ,AND 719
DARKNESS WAS UPON THE FACE OF WATER. AND RUH OF GOD WAS A 720
HETCHER ON THE FACE OF WATER[S]<1> 721

P
a
g
e
2
5

A] 722
B] One may see the word by word comparesion of the most mistranslated 723
part of the verse. See that to translate Spirit Of God Or Wind Or Air Of God 724
was moving to and fro is an in correct translation for all times and 725
eternities.. What so ever it was -= it was sitting like a bird on the face of 726
water not moving at all.[whether it be spirit or wind or air] 727
Mim H inP lA tphrM mihlA hvR V 728
WARNING. DO NOT TRY TO READ THE HOLY TEXT FROM LEFT TO RIGHT. OTHER 729
WISE IT WILL BE A DISGRACE TO THE HOLY TEXT 730
V = And V 731
Ruhh[Ruh]= wind, air,spirit.ghost,soul hvR 732
Alhim=God mihlA 733
Mrhhpt=To Sit on somelike like a bird sits on its eggs to get them hatch 734
tphrM 735
Al= on,upon lA 736
Pni= face inP 737
H=the H. 738
739
Mim= water Mim 740
The construction Ruhh Alhim implies Ruh Of Alohim./Alhim. 741
Thus the meaning is as follow. 742
Thus the meaning is as follow. 743

P
a
g
e
2
6

<< the Ruh Of GOD was sitting on the face of 744
water[ Like a bird which sits on eggs to get them 745
hatch] . 746
Or more accurately the meaning is as follow. 747
<< the Ruh Of GOD was sitter on the face of 748
water>> [ Like a bird which sits on eggs to get 749
them HATCHED] Since there is no 750
continuous tense in Hebrew Neither Past 751
continuous nor Present Continous. [It may not be 752
reminded that Future continuous is beyond all 753
Hebraic thoughts,since it is the most obvious fact 754
of Hebrew language.] and the only possibilities are 755
indefinite tense [sit, sat] or active particibles [not 756
present participles like sitting, but sitter, or one 757
that sits, or one that does sit.It may however be 758
noted that Past Participles are in close 759
approximation to Passive Participles] 760
The Hebraic word Ruh is deliberately kept conserved in the translation since the point is to 761
shew the static nature of Ruh, and not the Dynamic nature of It irrespective of the proper 762
alternative of it. 763
764
765
766
767
768

P
a
g
e
2
7

FIRST PRIMILINARY 769
770
HOSHIX [XSH] means Darrkess . This means that there was no light 771
but there was water etc. The may contemplate that there was no light and the 772
Earth was inhabitant. No biological living thing was on Earth. 773
No thing could be seen since there was no light to see. Every thing was in 774
darkness. But there was earth in its actual form. No thing shews that there was 775
no form of Earth. Such a translation is misleading. 776
This also shews that there was liquid water [not ice]. 777
Second preliminary 778
The verse does not say that earth was formless and void. In does say it was 779
INHABITANT and EMPTY. 780
Once again one may sense some trinitical conspiracy behind this sort of 781
translation. 782
This is to induce the concept of Philosophical Form and Voidness [CHOAS] in 783
Genesis which can be used for supporting the DOGMA of Trinity Of GOD. 784
Third preliminary. 785
The word TUHUM [mvhT] means Water . May be translates as deposits of 786
water.But this is less verbal and Water is relatively and comparatively a better 787
translation . 788
FORTH PRIMILINARY 789
The word RUH is translated as Spirit. But it may be translated as AIR or Wind. A 790
spirit is neither solid nor liquid nor gas. Even Human Spirits [ghosts] are neither 791
solid nor liquid nor gas. But the wind or air does shew gaseous form of matter. 792
When compare to Water the liquid form , it is suggested that it is air or wind and 793
not the spirit of or souls or ghost. 794
So This Air of GOD, OR WIND OF GOD only means that Air5 or wind what so ever it 795
might be was not a Suppostum in general and a rational Suppositum in particular 796
and certainly Not a Hypostasis residing in the Ouasia Of Triune God with 797
neighbouring Hypostases. 798
But we shall see that air is more correct translation then wind since Wind is 799
blowing air in a particular direction, and it moves from one place to another place 800
in a particular direction. But this air was not moving at all. There for it is AIR and 801

P
a
g
e
2
8

just air even if one may translate it as Wind [BLOWING/MOVING AIR IN A 802
PATRTICULAR DIRECTION.] 803
FIFTH PRIMILINARY 804
The Hebrew word MARAPHAT means hatching. 805
It is the position of a [female] Bird sitting on her eggs to hatch them. A bird some 806
times even swells her body to cover her eggs. 807
So Hatcher bird is the true representative of Ruh hence it is some what 808
condensed air with some pressure on water since a bird does press her eggs by 809
her own weight. 810
This is the static Ruh of Hebraic Genesis and the Ruh of translations is dynamic 811
since it blows or moves to and fro. 812
This is deliberately done just to reject the concept of a Created Ruh [AIR]. The 813
concept of Hypostatic Spirit moving to and fro on the face of wather may 814
correspond to the movement of Hypostatic Spirit or Ghost when it incarnated in a 815
dove by assuming the nature of the bird dove. 816
But Ruh is air which has some pressure on the face or surface of Water[s].But 817
this air is pressing water and this air is reffered to God. This means that God was 818
the creator of this Ruh. The reference of the RUH to God is of creative nature and 819
not of hypostatic nature. 820
SIXTH PRIMILINARY. 821
The word face may be taken as SURFANCE like SUFACE of water instead of face 822
of water but if the Hebraic words are concern Face Of Water is preferred over 823
Surface of water even if the word surface is more easy to conceive in minds for a 824
student of Chemistry or Physics yet Laxitonically FACE IS THE CORRECT 825
TRANSLATION. 826
Seventh Preliminary 827
828
A more close translation close in meaning is as follow,. 829
830
AND THE EARTH [ARS] WAS NOT -HABITENT AND 831
EMPTY ,AND DARKNESS WAS UPON THE FACE OF 832
WATER. AND RUH OF GOD WAS SITTING LIKE A 833

P
a
g
e
2
9

BIRD WHICH HATCHES [HER EGGS] ON THE FACE 834
[SURFACE]OF WATER[S] 835
Or more Hebraically as: 836
AND THE EARTH [ARS] WAS NOT IN-HABITENT 837
AND EMPTY ,AND DARKNESS WAS UPON THE 838
FACE OF WATER. AND RUH OF GOD SAT LIKE A 839
BIRD WHICH HATCHES [HER EGGS] ON THE FACE 840
[SURFACE] OF WATER[S]. 841
IT MAY BE NOTED THAT THERE IS NO 842
GRAMMATICAL CONTINOUS TENSE OR VERB IN 843
HEBREW. THERE FORE THE BEST ENGLISH 844
ALTERNATIVE IS THE INDEFINITE TENSE AND 845
MEANING. WHETHER IT BE PAST OR PRESENT OR 846
FUTURE.It may be noted that GOD never required a 847
continuous tense to Express His Sentences. 848
Seventh Preliminary. 849
A moving Spirit is more close to trinitical Spirit 850
rather than a not moving spirit , that is why the 851
dynamic translation is made rejecting the original 852
Hebraic word. 853
Athanasianism believes that Spirit is a Divine 854
Hypostatic Suppoitum . Unitarianisms are divided 855
over the issue of the spirit. Some believe that it is 856
a created Suppositum, some believe that it is a 857

P
a
g
e
3
0

NON SUPPOSITUMIC FORCE, and some believe 858
that is some thing created which is some time 859
Suppositumized by God and Other times is 860
reverted to Non Suppositumic state as according 861
to Will Of God. Question is that if this is a 862
Hypostasis living in the Divine Ousia Of Sureme 863
Being then it cannot drift away from the Ousia, 864
hence it can not be on the waters with out 865
assuming a non eternal nature. But a HYPOSASIS 866
CAN ASSUME ONLY a human nature, that is why if 867
the spirit is a Hypostasis then it must have 868
assumed some human nature before moving to and 869
fro other wise with out assuming any nature it 870
cannot come on earth since it can not be drifted 871
from Ousia leaving behind neighbouring 872
hypostases and to land on earth to move to and 873
fro. 874
CONCLUSION. 875
THE SPIRIT OF GOD WAS NOT MOVING TO OR FRO 876
AND NOT BLOWING BUT SITTING AND HATCHING 877
DEPOSITS OF WATHER. 878
THIS SPIRIT WAS NEITHER A CREATED 879
SUPPOSTUM NOR A HYPOSTATIC SUPPOSITUM 880
BUT 881
A WIND. [A NON SUPPOSITUMIC THING] 882

P
a
g
e
3
1

As it is clear that in trinitical Christology No 883
Hypostasis inDivine Ousia Of Triune God has 884
power to assume the nature OF AIR OR WIND OR 885
WATHER, AND HAS ONLY POWER TO BECOME 886
MALE HUMAN BEING By assuming [MALE] human 887
nature, AND PERHAPS [MALE] DOVES AS WELL By 888
assuming [MALE] Dove Nature .IT IS TRIED TO 889
SKIP THE CONSEQUENCES WHICH DOES NOT 890
CONCORDM WITH TRINITY AND RELATED 891
TRNITICAL DOGMAS, THEY HAVE 892
MISTRANSLATED THE STATIC RUH OF HEBRAIC 893
TEXTY IN FEVOR OF DYNAMIC RUH OF 894
TRANSLATIONS. ONCE AGAIN KEEP IN MIND 895
ONCE FOR ALL TIMES THAT THE HEBRAIC WORD 896
897
does not mean To Move To And Fro. 898
899
900
.................................................................................... 901
<1> iT MAY BE TRANSLATED AS PLURAL OR SINGULAR DEPENDING UPON THE 902
CONTEXT. 903
904
, 905
.<2> The words SPIRIT and GHOST were once used in almost same sense. But 906
now a Spirit may be Good or Bad or Neutral. But a ghost is always bad except in 907

P
a
g
e
3
2

the case the word Holy is before it, Such a distinction has made a problem .Since 908
it may not be objectionable to a number of persons to call Holy Spirit As Spirit Of 909
God, But It may be objectionable to many of them to call HOLY GHOST as Ghost 910
Of God. 911
It is very interesting to note once for all that even then Holy Ghost and Holy Spirit 912
are two English terms used for the one and the same Trinitical Hypostasis as 913
according to English believers of Dogma Of Trinity. This is the reason that the 914
incorrect translation And Spirit Of God Was Moving To And Fro is never translated 915
as And Ghost Of God Was Moving To And Fro. 916
But fortunately the word ghost when refers to the founder of Christianity Yeshua 917
or Isu still convey a good meaning. One still find about Yeshua /Iesus that He gave 918
up the Ghost, instead of he gave up the Spirit. But once again the reason to keep 919
this word is to save believers in the Trinitical Dogma from believing that Issus 920
gave up the Ruh Of Elohem OR The Pnuma Of Theos mensioned in their 921
translation of Genesis. 922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929