Area of

Assessment
Mark
weigh
tage
80%-100%
A
75%-79%
A-
60%-74%
B+, B, B-
50%-59%
C+, C
40%-49%
C-, D
1%-39%
F
Marks
a)
Introduction
and coverage
of question
Relevance of
question
10%
Comprehensive
Entirely relevant
with good
justifications
Broad
Relevant with
good
justification
Reasonable
Not always
directly
relevant
Incomplete
Includes
irrelevant
material
Vague
Do not
address
question or
vaguely
address the
question
Complete
inability to
understand
and answer
question

b)
Structure and
clarity of
discussion
20%
Good
Clear

Good and clear
discussion with
relevant and
precise original
thought

Good
Clear

Good and clear
discussion with
somewhat
relevant
original thought

Reasonable
Lacks
Precision

Lack of
precision in
discussion
without
originality
Reasonable
Incomplete


Not precise and
no originality
Poor
No clear
Structure
No
structure

c)
Coverage
appropriate
reading
Extent of
wider
reading
Understandin
g content of
reading
5%
Wide coverage
evidence of wider
reading

Ideas from sources
carefully and
accurately
explained ,in
context and
achieve synthesis
Solid coverage
Good grasp of
essential items

Good
understanding
with accurate
exposition
Some
coverage of
essential
reading

Some
understanding,
but
incomplete
and unclear
explanations
Inadequate
coverage/
reading


Confused
exposition with
inaccuracies

Slavish
following of
one or two
texts

Confused and
unable to see
key
connections
and fails to
grasp context
Minimal
reading


Very
confused


d)

Correct
referencing/
Documentati
on
/grammatical
errors

5%
Very few, no
grammar,
punctuation and
spelling errors;
Limited or no
composed
sentences or
paragraphs; Well
structured and
smooth flow
between major
points or
paragraphs
Proper citation of
relevant sources;
proper referencing
and citation
formats (Harvard
style)
Limited or no
grammar,
punctuation and
spelling errors;
Limited or no
composed
sentences or
paragraphs;
Well structured
and smooth
flow between
major points or
paragraphs;
Proper citation
of relevant
sources; proper
referencing and
citation formats
(Harvard style)
Occasional
grammar,
punctuation
and spelling
errors;
Limited or no
composed
sentences or
paragraphs;
Easy to read
and
understand
Some
improper
citation of
relevant
sources
Some grammar,
punctuation and
spelling errors;
Few poorly
composed
sentences or
paragraphs, but
do not detract
from reading or
understanding
Little citation of
relevant sources
Numerous
grammar,
punctuation
and spelling
errors; poorly
composed
sentences or
paragraphs;
difficult to
read or
understand
No proper
citation of
relevant
sources;
Extensive
grammar,
punctuatio
n and
spelling
errors;
poorly
composed
sentences
or
paragraphs
; difficult
to read or
understand
No proper
citation of
relevant
sources;

TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013/2014
FEBRUARY 2014
ABDM2083 ORGANIZATION & HUMAN RESOURCE
MARKING SCHEME FOR GROUP REPORT
Sec Assessment Marks Allocation Marks Given
1 a) Introduction 10
2 b) Content 20
3 c) Conclusion 5
4 d) Quality of the group report
-Languages 2
-Structure and layout 2
-Page number & Plagiarism 1
statement
Total Marks

40 marks

Comments:
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
_________
Name of marker: _________________________
Signature of marker: _____________________ Date: _________________________