Presented by: Franklin J. Conklin PE, Gary K. Munkelt & Associates WELCOME
Benefits of Precast Concrete Design, Construction & Performance
Overview of Loads & Codes for Concrete Structural Design Highway, Railroad & Airport Benefits of Precast Concrete -Design-
Proven / Predictable / Available Materials Research Well Funded & Accepted Manufacturer & Component Certifications Mature Codes
Benefits of Precast Concrete -Construction- Produced Locally & Ready When You Are Shop Built & High Quality Modular Assembly or Large Components Can Include Specialty Components Forgiving Installation / Accommodate Various Geotechnical Requirements Availability Availability Modular Assembly Modular Assembly Large Single Components Specialty Process Component Variable Geotech. Requirements Variable Geotech. Requirements Benefits of Precast Concrete -Performance- Flexible Geometry Conveyance or Retention/Detention Direct Loading or Deep Structures Resist Buoyancy Custom Finishes Durable / Sustainable
Large Conveyance Volumes Long Conveyance Runs Large Retention Assemblies Large Retention Assemblies Shallow / Wide- Detention PROJECT TOTAL - 250,000 CU FT STORAGE Shallow / Wide - Detention Direct Loading Direct Loading Direct Loading Deep Burial Buoyancy Protection Buoyancy Protection Custom Finishes Benefits of Precast Concrete -Questions- ?
AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE ACI 318 11 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete
General Code For Concrete Construction
Code formulated with load and strength reduction factors such that members can be proportioned for adequate strength & serviceability GENERAL SPECIFICATION ACI MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE GENERAL SPECIFICATION ACI MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE
AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE ACI 350 06 Code Requirements for Environmental Engineering Concrete Structures
precast concrete environmental structures designed and constructed in accordance with ASTM or AWWA are not covered in this code. ASTM - WET C913-08 Standard Specification for Precast Concrete Water and Wastewater Structures
C890-13 Standard Practice for Minimum Structural Design Loading for Monolithic or Sectional Precast Concrete Water and Wastewater Structures
Live Loads follow/refer to AASHTO Standard Specs Default minimum lateral loads coefficients are given Actual coefficient depend on soil properties
C857-13 Standard Practice for Minimum Structural Design Loading for Underground Precast Concrete Utility Structures
Live Loads follow/refer to AASHTO Standard Specs Default minimum lateral loads coefficients are given Actual coefficient depend on soil properties
ASTM - ROUND C478-13 Standard Specification for Precast Reinforced Concrete Manhole Sections
Top Slabs: Proof of Design Test Rational Design per ACI 318
Walls: Circumferential Reinforcing of Hoop Steel
Base Sections: Rational Design per ACI 318
Minimum area of steels may not be areas required by design
ASTM BOX CULVERT C1433-13b Standard Specification for Precast Reinforced Concrete Monolithic Box Sections for Culverts, Storm Drains, and Sewers
C1577-13a Standard Specification for Precast Reinforced Concrete Monolithic Box Sections for Culverts, Storm Drains, and Sewers Designed According to AASHTO LRFD
Be careful, some of these structures will not have Bridge Rating >1.0
ASTM BOX CULVERT Gives wall thickness and reinforcing for standard single cell box culvert sections for highway & various soil cover loading
1433 AASHTO Standard Specs HS-20 or Interstate Truck
1577 AASHTO LRFD HL-93
Be careful, these designs do not consider special state defined trucks & some of these structures may not have Bridge Rating >1.0
HIGHWAY AASHTO - American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 17th Edition (Interims through 2003)
HIGHWAY AASHTO - American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials June 28th, 2000 FHWA Memo
All new culverts, retaining walls, and other standard structures on which States initiate preliminary engineering after October 1, 2010, shall be designed by LRFD Specifications, with the assumption that the specifications and software for these structures are "mature" at this time.
HIGHWAY Live Loads Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 17th Edition (Interims through 2003) (Standard Specs.)
HS-20 Truck Loading
HIGHWAY Live Loads AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 6th Edition (Interims through 2013) (LRFD)
HL93Truck Loading
HS-20 Vs. HL-93 Standard Specs (SS) Vs. Load & Resistance Factor Design(LRFD) Design Load Factors Top Slabs
Standard Specification LRFD [Table 3.22.1-A Group 1(g x b)] [Table3.4.1-1 Strength 1] Live1.3x1.67=2.17 Max = 1.75 x 1.2 MP=2.1 Dead1.3x1.0=1.3 Max = 1.25 Vertical Earth1.3x1.0=1.3 Max = 1.35
Standard Specs (SS) Vs. Load & Resistance Factor Design(LRFD) Live Load Impact Factor SS [Table 3.22.1-A Group 1(g x b)] LRFD [Table3.4.1-1 Strength 1] 1.3@ grade 1+0.33(1.0-0.125D E ) 1.0 > 3 ft cover 1.21 at 3 ft cover
Live Load Distribution Rate Through Soil SS [Table 3.22.1-A Group 1(g x b)] LRFD [Table3.4.1-1 Strength 1] 1.75 to 1 1.15 to 1 or 1 to 1
Standard Specs (SS) Vs. Load & Resistance Factor Design(LRFD) Distribution Steel Same for Standard Specs(3.24.10.2) & LRFD (9.7.3.2) In bottom of top slab percentage of main positive moment reinforcement = 100/S 1/2 S = span in feet Need not be more than 50 percent In top of top slab As6 = 0.002 x Ag (min T&S Steel)
Standard Specs (SS) Vs. Load & Resistance Factor Design(LRFD) Lateral Loads Load Factors
Standard Specification LRFD [Table 3.22.1-A Group 1(g x b)] [Table3.4.1-1 Strength 1] Live1.3x1.67=2.17 Max = 1.75 Horizontal Earth1.3x1.0=1.3 Max = 1.35
Standard Specs (SS) Vs. Load & Resistance Factor Design(LRFD) Lateral Loads Soil structure Interaction Factor
Same for Both Standard Specs & LRFD
WE = Fe W Bc H Fe = 1 + 0.20(H/Bc) Fe shall not exceed 1.15 for installations with compacted fill along the sides of the box section, or 1.40 for installations with un-compacted fill
Standard Specs (SS) Vs. Load & Resistance Factor Design(LRFD) Lateral Loads
Soil Coefficients - Ka/Ko from Soils report Standard Specs, Coulombs vs. LRFD, Rankine Shake out about the same for either method Unit Weight from soils report & unaffected by code Soil-Structure Interaction Factor, same for both codes Surcharges from other than traffic loads unaffected
Standard Specs (SS) Vs. Load & Resistance Factor Design(LRFD) Presumptive Dead Loads (EFP)
Standard Spec(6.2.1 Reinforced Concrete Boxes) Vertical Earth Pressure = 120 pcf Horizontal Earth Pressure = 60 pcf Add Bedding Factor (Soil / Structure Interaction) =1.15 Cant tell if this is supposed to be saturated soil
EFP =60 x 1.16 = 69 pcf
Standard Specs (SS) Vs. Load & Resistance Factor Design(LRFD) Presumptive Dead Loads (EFP)
LRFD (T 3.11.5.5.1 Active)Earth Pressure = 30 40 PCF Depends on soil type Assumes free draining (water is prevented from creating hydrostatic pressure)
EFP = 40 pcf + 62.4 (hydrostatic) = 102.4 pcf
Standard Specs (SS) Vs. Load & Resistance Factor Design(LRFD) Lateral Live Loads Standard Spec heq = 2.0 ft
LRFD (3.11.6.4) p = K s heq H < 5 ft heq = 4 ft H < 10 ft heq = 3 ft H < 20 ft heq = 2 ft
Standard Specs (SS) Vs. Load & Resistance Factor Design(LRFD) Distribution Width (Main Reinforcing Parallel To Traffic) LRFD (4.6.2.10) E = 96 + 1.44S (for axle) E in inches and S in feet
Standard Specs(3.24.3.2) E = 4 + 0.06S (for wheel) E in feet and S in feet
Standard Specs (SS) Vs. Load & Resistance Factor Design(LRFD) Other Considerations
LRFD Crack Control Criteria vs. SS Service Load Stress
Shear Calculations Different
Standard Specs (SS) Vs. Load & Resistance Factor Design(LRFD) Conclusion
Designs for Standard Specifications need to be updated, but there may not be any change to concrete & steel
RAILROAD AREMA - American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association
2013 Manual for Railway Engineering
Ch. 8 - Concrete Structures & Foundations RAILROAD Anything within 25 ft of track centerline should be designed for railroad loads
Design follows ACI318 design method
Cooper E80 live loads, load factors & impact factors all unique to this code
AIRPORTS FAA Federal Aviation Administration Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs) for Airport Projects
Current Advisory Circular Cancelled - FAA - AC 150 5320-6D New - FAA - AC 150 5320-6E
AC150 gives guidance for live loads applied to structures by heavy airplanes
FAA -AC150/5320 Appendix 3 DESIGN OF STRUCTURES FOR HEAVY AIRPLANES For many structures the design is highly dependent upon the airplane landing gear configuration. Our assessment indicates that three basic configurations will, if all are considered in the design of the bridge components, provide sufficient support for any airplane which may be forthcoming. These consist of two areas enclosing eight wheels each, or 16 wheels per airplane comprising the main gear. Nose gears, as such, are not considered, except as they occur in the static load. The area dimensions are 6 to 8 feet by 20 feet each supporting half of the airplane gross weight. Wheel prints are uniformly spaced within their respective areas. FAA -AC150/5320 Appendix 3 DESIGN OF STRUCTURES FOR HEAVY AIRPLANES Direct Loading. Decks and covers subject to direct heavy airplane loadings such as manhole covers, inlet grates, utility tunnel roofs, bridges, etc., should be designed for the following loadings:
Manhole covers for 100,000 lb. wheel loads with 250 psi tire pressure. For spans of 2 feet or less in the least direction, a uniform live load of 250 psi. For spans of 2 feet or greater in the least direction, the design will be based on the number of wheels which will fit the span. Wheel loads of 50,000 to 75,000 pounds should be considered. Special consideration will be given to structures that will be required to support both in-line and diagonal traffic lanes, such as diagonal taxiways or apron taxi routes. If structures require expansion joints, load transfer may not be possible.
FAA -AC150/5320 Appendix 3 DESIGN OF STRUCTURES FOR HEAVY AIRPLANES Actual Wheel Configurations from pavement design documents provided to FAA by airplane Manufacturers
Consider wheel/gear load & geometry give & use ACI 318 design methods to proportion members
747 Design Data
CONCRETE LOADS & CODES Questions ?
Loads and Codes Design of Underground Precast Concrete Structures
Presented by: Franklin J. Conklin PE, Gary K. Munkelt & Associates