You are on page 1of 4

We use cookies to give you the best online experience.

By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn
more here . Close Me
Home > USA > Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Last Updated: October 10 2014
Article by Michael C. Griffin and Mark S. Wierman
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
United States: Reconsidering Pre-Answer Motions
A motion to dismiss filed unwisely may result in a well-written, well-argued, but very expensive motion that actually harm your
interests
You receive a complaint and forward it to your outside counsel requesting that the firm defend the company's interests. You
then think back to your experiences as a junior associate when you were asked by a partner, "How should we answer?" A trick
question, of course, because in your delay in responding, the partner screams "WE DON'T ANSWER, WE MOVE TO
DISMISS!" This is a common reaction: Come out guns a-blazing to dismiss these specious allegations against the venerable
client.
Although this course of action is appealing because a win on a motion to dismiss vindicates the litigator and ends the case, it
is worth pausing to consider the strategic implications involved with filing pre-answer motions. Encourage your outside
counsel to put the litigator muscles away and take a long view of not only the case, but your company's interests. Here are a
few strategic considerations to be considered prior to filing a motion to dismiss.
Reconsidering Pre-Answer Motions - Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration - United States http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/345732/trials+appeals+compensation/Reconsidering+pr...
1 of 4 10/16/2014 2:37 PM
Rule 11
The Federal Rules, and most state rules, of Civil Procedure prohibit filing frivolous or delaying motions. Your first question to
discuss with counsel: Do the allegations fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted? The general rule in both state
and federal court is that when reviewing a motion to dismiss, the court must treat the well pleaded allegations as true. If in
good faith you can assert that the plaintiff failed to state a claim, move to the next stage of the analysis.
Venue
Federal court provides defendants with advantages when filing motions to dismiss against a poorly worded complaint,
opposing counsel working in an area out of his or her expertise, or apro se plaintiff. The first is that the motion delays the time
for initial attorney conferences, and more importantly, discovery and scheduling deadlines. The second is the U.S. Supreme
Court decisions Bell Atlantic v. Twombly (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal (2009), which some argue substantially heightened
federal pleading standards.
It's a different story in state court, as most states have not adopted the rulings and rely on notice pleading, i.e., whether the
allegations place a party on notice of a cause of action. Moreover, state courts who do not utilize scheduling orders or who
utilize "rolling" trial calendars allow a case to move along even when dispositive motions are pending. The motion may not be
heard for some time, limiting the time available to conduct discovery and prepare for trial.
Educating the plaintiff
The primer on the nuances of properly pleading a violation of the unfair trade statute or the Jones Act may be a masterpiece
of legal work product, but it may also educate the plaintiff on the law and provide the plaintiff with legal research paid for by
you. Motions to dismiss can be hard to win and in many cases, the court will allow the plaintiff to amend the complaint. The
plaintiff is now in possession of not only the legal research, but also all of the required elements of a cause of action needed
to revise the complaint. The motion may also identify defenses, the theory of the case, and the key areas for discovery.
Settlement?
Many lawsuits grow out of extended business relationships or disputes with some history of discussion, limited compromise
and failed negotiation. Is this a case which can be settled, or is the plaintiff going to take this dispute to the mat? Motion
practice can be expensive. Most state courts require hearings for all motions and will not decide the motion on the papers.
Reconsidering Pre-Answer Motions - Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration - United States http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/345732/trials+appeals+compensation/Reconsidering+pr...
2 of 4 10/16/2014 2:37 PM
Do you have a Question or Comment?
Click here to email the Author
Interested in the next Webinar on this Topic?
Click here to register your Interest
Michael C. Griffin
Bradley Arant Boult
Cummings LLP
Email Firm
View Website
More from this Firm
More from this Author
This means time spent preparing for oral argument, travel time getting to court, and in smaller counties, a day spent waiting
for the motion to be called. All for naught if the court allows the party to amend. Moreover, the motion may cause the plaintiff
to dig in, offended by the argument the complaint is "specious."
Know the audience
The motion is also the first impression of the company and counsel to the judge. As such, it is best to consider how this judge
perceives 12(b) motions. As delay tactics used to increase litigation costs or as legitimate tools to narrow issues? How has this
judge ruled on this issue in the past? The answers to these questions may be hard to find in certain jurisdictions, but they
must be considered prior to filing.
Legal services are expensive, and both in house and outside counsel are called to be good stewards of the company's
resources. A motion to dismiss filed unwisely may result in a well-written, well-argued, but very expensive motion with second
and third order effects that actually harm your interests. It may be better to keep the powder dry and look toward a motion for
summary judgment. This course of action may result in higher angst in the short term, but provides greater advantages and
freedom of movement and may even be more cost efficient. Review the cost/benefit analysis before filing and seek an
objective prediction on the likelihood of success of a motion to dismiss. If the discussion and analysis suggest that a motion to
dismiss stands a chance of ending the case early or forcing a quick settlement, file away.
Republished with permission. This article first appeared in Inside Counsel on September 25, 2014.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about
your specific circumstances.
Contributor
Reconsidering Pre-Answer Motions - Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration - United States http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/345732/trials+appeals+compensation/Reconsidering+pr...
3 of 4 10/16/2014 2:37 PM
Contact Us | Your Privacy | Feedback
Mondaq Ltd 1994 - 2014
All Rights Reserved

Michael C. Griffin Mark S. Wierman
Authors

Reconsidering Pre-Answer Motions - Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration - United States http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/345732/trials+appeals+compensation/Reconsidering+pr...
4 of 4 10/16/2014 2:37 PM

You might also like