Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Youngs modulus,
From which we get,
Substituting this into
gives
For a bar of length , total strain energy is
If the bar has constant c/s area
Normal stress,
so
Strain Energy due to Shear
Putting the above expressions together gives shear strain energy,
Strain energy
Shear modulus
From which we get
Total energy from shear
Now
Strain Energy due to Bending
Strain energy becomes
Total strain energy from bending
For constant bending moment
Bending theory equation:
Strain energy =work done=
now
So
Strain Energy due to Torsion
From simple torsion theory
Total strain energy from torsion
Since T is constant in most practical applications
Also from simple torsion theory
So we have
Now the polar moment of inertia for a shaft
Also the volume for a bar is
Substituting these into the above expression for strain energy gives
Torsion theory
Angle of twist is in radians
Strain energy = work done =
*
Variational Theorems
As stated before there are two ways of approaching FE Method
One is fairly straight-forward and easy to understand
Physical approach (a.k.a. model based simulation)
start with a physical system/ structure
break it down into elements
reconstruct by assembly process using nodes
find the solution (deformations, etc.)
FEM- take a complex
problem that is difficult to solve
break it down into
a simple one that can be solved
Physical model or
Model based simulation
Break down into
Elements and nodes
Solve for displacements
at nodes and interpolate
across element to get strains and
stresses
Governing DE which often
Cannot be solved directly
Approximate
solution* BUT enforcing BCs and
substituting back into DE does not yield
sufficient # of linearly independent
equations to solve for unknown
coefficients
to FEM
Variational
Methods
e.g. Ritz
Generate sufficient linearly
independent equations to solve
for coefficients
What do you do when you have something like this? how do you break up a ODE/PDE
so you can solve it?
)
Here we have a Differential Equation (DE) or governing equation
This equation must be manipulated in order to generate a discrete FE model
Formulation of a variational or weak form of the governing equation yield FEM
equations which can then be solved
This is the Mathematical approach
Because DEs are difficult to solve so we seek approximate solutions using various
methods that must minimise error in solution
In fact FEM assumes that the solution of the DE is a piecewise continuous function
Two formulations (i.e. formulation of FE equations) which are widely used are the
Galerkin Method and the Ritz Method
We will consider the Ritz Method which is derived using the Principle of Minimum
Potential Energy
Formulation- process by which governing equation is broken down into a system of
equations (represented in matrix form) which can then be solved by computers
Equations are solved element by element at the nodes
Quick Review of Differential Equations
Linear Differential Equations have the general form:
e.g.
)
this DE will have two boundary conditions (BCs)
two types of BCs (i) Neumann/ Natural Boundary Conditions (NBCs) &
(ii) Dirichlet/ Essential Boundary Conditions (EBCs)
NBCs consist of higher order derivatives and are not sufficient to solve the DE
completely
EBCs are sufficient to solve the DE completely
Thus, the DE above can be solved completely if one of the two conditions is met:
(a) EBC prescribed at both ends i.e.
and
Now
)
will have four BCs of which two must be EBCs
Can be solved completely if:
(a)
at both ends or
(b)
at the other
In this case the NBCs are
and
Potential Energy
A system which is constrained at certain portions will deform when subjected to loading
These deformations are unknowns and are precisely what we seek in FEM i.e.
deformations are linked to strains, and strains are linked to stresses
After loading the structure attains a new state and the Potential Energy (PE) of the system
(elastic) is given by
where is the PE, is the strain energy and is the work done on the body by external
forces (-ve sign implies energy lost by external forces)
There are many possible deformed/deflected shapes of the loaded structure so the
question becomes: How do we know which is the correct deflected shape?
Total potential energy attains stationary value (maximum or minimum) at the actual
displacement.
The Principle of Minimum Potential Energy
Every applied load will have a unique deformed shape at equilibrium and this unique
shape occurs when the PE is an extreme value (either maximum or minimum)
When the PE is a minimum the equilibrium state is said to be stable
Among all the displacement states of a conservative system that satisfy compatibility and
boundary restraints, those that also satisfy equilibrium make the potential energy stationary.
or
A system is in a state of equilibrium only when its potential energy is minimal.
or
For conservative structural systems, of all the kinematically* admissible deformations, those
corresponding to the equilibrium state extremise (i.e. maximise or minimise) the total
potential energy. If the extremum is a minimum, the equilibrium state is stable. (*satisfy
geometric boundary conditions)
Assumptions: (i) strains and displacements are small
(ii) no loss of energy in static loading process i.e.
(ii) system is conservative
Principle of Minimum Potential Energy is the basis for displacement FEM
Example
Use the Principle of Minimum Potential Energy to solve for the equilibrium values of
are applied.
Solution
The deflection (elongation or contraction) of the springs can be written as follows
Now so
[
For equilibrium, must be an extremum with respect to all DOF i.e.
These can be written in matrix form as
[
] {
} {
}
i.e , where K is the stiffness matrix
From this we can get the
s :
This set of simultaneous equations is now amenable to solution by computers
NB For elasticity problems
[]{} {}
Property [] Behaviour {} Action {}
Elastic Stiffness Displacement Force
Thermal Conductivity Temperature Heat source
Fluid Viscosity Velocity Body force
Variational Methods- A General Discussion
A variational method is one in which an approximate solution to a DE,
Variational methods:
property action
behaviour
unknowns
1. provide means by which DEs can be solved; DE is put in weighted integral form and
then an approximate solution over the domain assumed to be a linear combination
and unknown
coefficients
2. differ from each other in the choice of the weight function and integral statement
used which in turn dictates choice of approximate functions
Advantages
yield sufficient number of linearly independent equations for determination of
coefficients
Disadvantages
solution is piecewise over entire domain
difficult to construct approximate function for problems with arbitrary domains
coefficients are arbitrary
NOTE Variational Methods are not FEM- they are part of the pre-processing that leads to
FEM
weak form variational form total potential energy
there is a need to construct a weak form of DE and classify BCs
weak form weighted integral statement of DE in which the differentiation is distributed
between the dependent variable and the weight function and includes BCs
a weak form exists for all problems
The Variational Principle
In variational calculus we look for a function that minimises a functional
A functional is an equation which does not depend on coordinates but on functions. The
variables of the equation are functions
Variational Formulation
The variational statement can take several forms
Where
An example is
*
[]
It is essentially describes the potential energy of the system under investigation
The Ritz Method
The Ritz Method is a variational method
The exact solution of the governing equation is unknown but an approximate solution is
sought
The fundamental idea behind this method is to find an approximate solution which
minimizes a certain functional and having the form
Where
,
are approximate/trial
functions
The above Ritz function is a linear combination of N known functions that have unknown
coefficients
These coefficients are adjustable and can be varied until the lowest energy configuration
is found i.e.
The trial functions must satisfy the essential BCs
Ritz Equations for the Coefficients
When the approximate solution is substituted into the functional and integrated, we get
as a function of the Ritz coefficents
i.e.
(
The Ritz coefficient are adjusted such that i.e. is minimized with respect to the
parameters
This can be written as
The parameters are independent so
Are the N Ritz equations which give us the N Ritz parameters
If the functional is a quadratic the variation is given as
and are bilinear and linear forms
The Ritz approximation becomes
and
So
[
The system of linear Ritz equations
Or
provides a systematic procedure to the for derivation of approximation functions over
sub-regions of the domain
approximate functions often called interpolation functions and the degree of the
function depends on number of nodes in element and order of DE being solved
Advantages
geometrically complex domains of a problem are represented as a collection of
geometrically simple sub-domains finite elements
an approximate solution is derived over each element using the idea that ay continuous
function can be represented by linear combinations of algebraic polynomials
algebraic relations among unknown coefficients obtained by satisfying the governing
equation over each element
unknown coefficients represent actual values of the solution at the nodes
So we can say that :
FEM is essentially an element by element application of a variational method e.g. Ritz
Method
although there is only one FEM, every problem solved using FEM can have several
different models depending on the method used to generate equations
Exact solution
nodes
linear
quadratic
Ritz piecewise
continuous
Exact solution
FEM element by
element solution