Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ayatollahs
revolution in 1979 to understand its past, present and future role in relation
to the West, in general and the US in particular. The author poses and
answers some of the key questions such as, “What kind of the state is the
Takeyh begins his response by cautiously stating that, “More than any other
And, therefore, suggests that “the best way to of understanding the Islamic
Republic’s priorities is to expand canvass and expand and assess its foreign
more strongly, the author further clarifies the popular “..notion that Iran’s
distinct periods in Iran after 1979: the revolutionary era of the 1980s, the
tempered gradualism following the death of Khomeini and the end of the
Iran-Iraq war in 1989, the "reformist" period from 1997-2005 under President
Khatami, and the shift toward confrontation and radicalism since the election
Takeyh explains, in the present Iran, the rise of the New Right, a group of
who have slowly gained the control of the Iranian government. This can be
the author words, “The genius of Khomeini was his ability to weave his
The relationship between Iran and the US has been on decline. This has been
the case for over a quarter of century now. After Ayatollah Khomeini
overthrew the Shah with Iranian revolution, the US and Iran has been on a
high-rhetoric mode. For Iran, US is a Great Satan whereas for the US, Iran’s
an Axis of Evil. This war of rhetoric can have serious repercussions. Takeyh
policy-change on the part of the US. He argues that the US policy makers
have to view Iran with a more complex and sophisticated way and not just in
the light of 1979 anti-American Revolution. He reminds his readers, who are
primarily the foreign policymakers of the US, rather subtly, that the
revolution in Iran is over and that things have changed. It is therefore not
taking into account the internal disagreements and factions thus terming its
Instead, the author offers candid insights into Iranian politics, delving into
the origins of the Islamic Revolution of 1979 and tracking its evolution over
building and sustaining the Islamic Revolution such as Mir Hossein Mussavi,
Montazeri are now radically opposed to the regime of a New Right, a group
who are running the Iranian government today. This government has not
only withdrawn the previous reforms but has also blatantly antagonized the
United States and the Arab nations. Additionally, it has pursued power-
the region and the policy of antagonism with it may not be very effective.
containment policies of the Bush era; otherwise Iran will act increasingly like
region, being the only country with long- and medium-range missiles, it is
but necessary to have favorable ties with it. This is more crucial because of
the present differences between Iran and Israel and their tensions being at
an all-time high. Given the nuclear ambitions of Iran and its ties with groups’
regional integration. The United States has the power and influence to help
therefore, Takeyh writes, “for the Unites States is to ascertain how to deal
with the state that is too powerful to ignore and whose influence cannot be
This text hopes to see a new US-Iran relationship in which US will include, in
its vision of Iran , the existing realties on ground and will project itself as a
sincere and honest ally rather than antagonistic and manipulative super
power. This, the author believes, will pacify Iran’s fears and anger and it may
abandon or at least control its power ambitions. The words of the author
succinctly summarizes this as follows, “By choice and chance, Iran has now
emerged as a leading power of the Middle East, whereby its preferences and
its future”.
agencies. Ray Takeyh, with both, his deep historical insights and his grip on nuance, offers a
book that can easily be a standard text to understand the internal dynamics of Iran and the way
forward to have a stable relationship with the US. This should become an important reading for
the academics working on contemporary Iran as well as the policymakers’ experts especially in