Professional Documents
Culture Documents
pool distribution assets. ,lliances can be a useful tool to defend the existing market position, catch up with
competitors and in some cases restructure. ,lliances are not easy to manage. +ften they collapse after a
period of time. The ones which do well are characteri'ed by top management commitment, clear ob:ectives
and cultural similarities among the companies involved. , dynamic approach is desirable as the scope of an
alliance often tends to change over time. .,lliances are covered in more detail in Chapter 51.
T!e P ; G < Godre= s,lit
/n late 1558, the ,merican -#C9 .-ast #oving Consumer 9oods1 giant, %rocter $ 9amble .% $ 91 and a leading
/ndian business group, 9odre: set up a marketing :oint venture, %$9 "9odre: .%991 in which %$9 held a 01F stake
and 9odre: the remaining B5F. (avid Thomas, %$9Ns country manager in /ndia was appointed as C)+ while ,di
9odre:, the head of the /ndian company, became the chairman.
%$9 paid 9odre: roughly *s 0E crores to ac;uire its detergent brands, Trilo, Cey and )'ee. 9odre: became the sole
supplier to the :oint venture on a cost plus basis. %$9, on its part, gave a commitment that it would utilise 9odre:Ns
soap making capacity of E,EEE tonnes per annum. 9odre: was allowed to complete its existing manufacturing
contracts for two other #JCs, 4ohnson $ 4ohnson and *eckitt $ Coleman, but could not take up any new contracts.
%$9, on its part, would not appoint any other supplier until 9odre:Ns soap making capacity had been fully utilised.
9odre: transferred BEE of its sales people to the :oint venture.
-or both sides, the :oint venture seemed to make a lot of sense. %$9 got immediate access to 9odre:Ns soap making
facilities. /t would have taken %$9 at least a couple of years to implement a greenfield pro:ect. 9odre: also had
expertise in vegetable oil technology for making soaps. This expertise was useful in a country like /ndia, where beef
tallow could not be used and soap manufacturers had to depend on vegetable oil such as palm oil and rice bran oil.
%$9 also gained immediate access to a well connected distribution network consisting of some two million outlets.
)ven though %$9 had been around in /ndia for some time, its /ndian operations were essentially those of the erstwhile
*ichardson 2industan, which dealt primarily in pharmaceutical products such as Kicks. The non"pharma distribution
network of 9odre:, acted as a fine complement to %$9Ns existing pharma network. 9odre:, on the other hand, was
struggling with unutilised capacity. 9odre: also hoped to pick up useful knowledge from %$9, in areas such as
manufacturing, brand management and surfactant
0
technology. /n short, it looked as though the :oint venture had
created a win"win situation, with tremendous learning opportunities, for both partners.
The %$9 9odre: alliance became operational in ,pril 1556. ,round this time, %$9 increased its stake in its /ndian
subsidiary %$9 ./ndia1 from 01F to A0F, while 9odre:, after having operated for several years as a private company,
went public. %$9 engineers introduced new systems such as 9ood #anufacturing %ractices and #aterial *esources
%lanning in 9odre: plants. The two companies seemed to show a considerable amount of sensitivity to the cultural
differences between them. -or about a year, it looked as though things were going fine. Thereafter, elements of
distrust began to surface and the two companies found the differences in management styles too significant to be
brushed aside. 3y (ecember, 155B, rumours were rife that %$9 and 9odre: did not see eye to eye on many key issues.
+ne of the main problems that the :oint venture faced was that performance did not match up to expectations. /n 1558,
9odre: had sold 85,EEE tonnes of soap. ,fter increasing to BA,EEE in 155B the figure declined sharply to 6,EEE tonnes
in 1550. While sales volumes did not pick up as expected, costs began to rise. (ue to the cost plus agreement, 9odre:
had little incentive to cut costs. /nformed sources felt that 9odre: was charging *s 1E,EEE more per tonne than the
accepted processing costs. 9odre:, on its part, was unhappy that %$9 was not doing enough to promote brands like
Cey and Trilo that it had nurtured over the years. /t was also uncomfortable with %$9Ns methodical and analytical
approach as opposed to its own instinctive method of launching brands at breakneck speed. %$9, on its part, felt that
there was little logic or coordination in 9odre:Ns brand building exercises. /ts multinational, worldwide policy set its
own priorities, as explained by a %$9 executive
A
! OWe believe in introducing long"term brands with sustainable
consumer propositions. Without that, we :ust donNt know how to sell.O 3y mid 155B, sharp differences had developed
0
&urfactant is a key chemical ingredient in soaps and detergents to facilitate the cleansing action.
A
<Why %$9 and 9odre: broke up=, 3usiness /ndia, 4uly 10"8, 155A.
5
between %$9 and 9odre:. , senior 9odre: executive, 2.C. %ress, on deputation to the :oint venture, was ;uietly eased
out and sent back to a 9odre: group company.
, report in a leading /ndian maga'ine
7
aptly summed up the situation! O/n an atmosphere of fraying trust, the
advantages of the alliance faded into the background.= %$9 reali'ed it had gained distribution strengths but found
itself locked into an unsustainable manufacturing agreement and a loss making :oint venture. 9odre: felt let down on
two counts. <The capacity was not being utilised as guaranteed and more crucially, %$9Ns manufacturing process was
not delivering any benefit to 9odre:Ns painstakingly built portfolio of brands.O
/n late 155A, %$9 and 9odre: announced that the alliance was being terminated. The two companies would have little
to do with each other, except for 9odre: continuing to make Camay on behalf of %$9 for two more years and
providing office space to %$9 at its Kikhroli complex. %99 would be taken over by %$9, which would also retain the
detergent brands, Trilo, Cey and )'ee. #ost of %99Ns 00E people and the distribution network consisting of some
6EEE stockists would stay with %$9. 9odre: would absorb about 1EE sales people and get back its seven soap brands,
which had been leased to %99.
3oth %$9 and 9odre: felt that the amicable parting of ways made sense. ,di 9odre: remarked