Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2629
Thepresent data demonstrate that sterilepatients withseptate
uterus and no other cause of sterility have a signicantly higher
probability of conceiving after removal of the septum than
patients affected by idiopathic sterility. The two study groups
were homogeneous, and a bias in the diagnosis of idiopathic in-
fertility is unlikely, because the study population was restricted
to infertile women in whom a standard work-up including lap-
aroscopy revealed no factors that could explain infertility.
Data from the literature analyzing the impact of uterine
septum on the reproductive potential of women with primary
infertility is questionable. Several self-control studies (13
19) reported an increased pregnancy rate after metroplasty
in unselected groups of infertile patients, ranging from 21%
to 71%. Unfortunately, heterogeneity and low numbers of pa-
tients, retrospective design of some of them, and the absence
of a control group make the interpretation of the results dif-
cult. Data from assisted reproductive technologies (ART)
have also provided contrasting information on this issue. In
a retrospective analysis of untreated sterile patients present-
ing with septate uterus and undergoing ART for other reasons
(tubal factor, male factor, endometriosis), Marcus et al. (20)
found implantation and pregnancy rates similar to those of
the general sterile population undergoing ART, suggesting
that metroplasty would not be useful in patients without
any prior reproductive failure. In contrast, Lavergne et al.
(21) found signicantly lower implantation and pregnancy
rates after ART in sterile women with untreated uterine mal-
formation compared with the general sterile population.
Moreover, dividing the patients into groups according to
the treatment received, the difference was annulled when
patients underwent metroplasty.
More recently, Pabuccu and Gomel (6) published the rst
prospective observational study to assess the spontaneous
fecundity of a selected series of infertile women after metro-
plasty. A pregnancy rate of 41% was reported in patients with
septate uterus presenting no other reason for infertility after
surgical treatment of the malformation. Those authors sug-
gest that such a percentage, even though lower than those
reported in the literature concerning women with recurrent
abortion, supports the idea of the existence of a subtle
factor able to impair implantation in these patients. Unfor-
tunately, this study also was performed according to a self-
control design.
Although prospective randomized trials would be required
to denitively assess the relationship between septate uterus
and infertility, deontologic issues render such study design
unrealizable. Because this malformation is a cause of abor-
tion, it would not be ethical to randomize affected women
to a no treatment group. As a consequence, the only way
to perform a longitudinal prospective-controlled trial is to
identify an adequately selected control population. The pres-
ent study is the rst prospective trial designed to have women
with unexplained sterility treated surgically for uterine mal-
formation as the study population, and patients with
TABLE 1
Patient characteristics.
Group A Group B
Patients, n 44 132
Type, n
Va 8
Vb 36
Age, yrs 29.7 3.2 30.7 3.7
Duration of infertility, yrs 2.4 0.8 2.6 0.7
Body mass index, kg/m
2
22.9 2.5 23.4 2.7
Mollo. Metroplasty in unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 2009.
TABLE 2
Reproductive outcome.
Group A Group B
P
value
Patients, n 44 132
Pregnancies, n (%) 17 (38.6) 27 (20.4) <.05
Abortions, n (%) 2 (11.8) 2 (7.4) NS
Pretermdeliveries,
n (%)
3 (17.6) 1 (3.7) NS
Term deliveries,
n (%)
12 (70.6) 24 (88.9) NS
Live birth rate, % 34.1 18.9 <.05
Fecundity rate 4.27 1.92
Mollo. Metroplasty in unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 2009.
FIGURE 1
Cumulative probability of a pregnancy in the 12
months after the control visit scheduled 1 month
after the metroplasy in study group A (red line) and 1
month after the diagnostic laparoscopy in control
group B (black line).
Mollo. Metroplasty in unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 2009.
2630
Mollo et al. Metroplasty in unexplained infertility Vol. 91, No. 6, June 2009
unexplained sterility with no uterine malformation as the
control group. This design was based on the idea that if sep-
tate uterus is a cause of infertility, an increase in fecundity
rate after its removal would be expected. This hypothesis
seems to be supported by the present data. More specically,
both cumulative probability to become pregnant and fecun-
dity rate were signicantly higher in the study group.
The results of this study enforce the idea that uterine septum
could affect implantation and early pregnancy processes, and
they are consistent with experimental and histologic ndings.
Septumstructure seems to be different than that of normal my-
ometrium and is probably the cause of the altered maturation
process of the covering endometrium that can lead to implan-
tation failure. As a matter of fact, some authors have observed
an altered proportion between muscular and broelastic con-
nective tissue and an abnormal vascularization (22). Fedele
et al. (23) found maturation defects of the endometrium cov-
ering the septum with reduced number of glandular ostia and
altered maturation of the cilia. In these patients, the resection
of the septum could lead to a restoration of the normal uterine
contractility and endometrial maturation, which in turn may
result in a improved reproductive performance.
In recent years, technologic improvements in endoscopic
technology have led to the introduction of minihysteroscopes
not exceeding 5 mm in diameter, tted with bipolar elec-
trodes working in saline solution, which allow a simple and
safe treatment of many intrauterine pathologies, reducing
the risk of severe complications (24). We have recently
shown (25) that a minihysteroscope with bipolar electrode
for the incision of uterine septum is as effective as resecto-
scope with unipolar electrode in terms of reproductive out-
come and is associated with a shorter operating time and
a lower complication rate.
At the present time it is widely acknowledged that the
diagnosis of septate uterus demands surgical treatment
when associated with adverse reproductive outcome, but
the role of metroplasty in infertile women with a septate
uterus and otherwise unexplained infertility is still debated
(6). The ndings of the present study, together with availabil-
ity of minisurgical techniques, strongly encourage the treat-
ment of uterine septa diagnosed during the sterility work-up
of women whose primary infertility remains otherwise
unexplained.
REFERENCES
1. Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simon C, Pellicer A.
Reproductive impact of congenital uterine anomalies. Hum Reprod
1997;12:227781.
2. Acien P. Incidence of mullerian defects in fertile and infertile women.
Hum Reprod 1997;12:13726.
3. Colacurci N, De Franciscis P, Fornaro F, Fortunato N, Perino A. The
signicance of hysteroscopy treatment of congenital uterine malforma-
tions. Reprod Biomed Online 2002;4:524.
4. Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Devroey P. Clinical
implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment re-
sults. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7:16174.
5. Acien P, Acien M. Evidence-based management of recurrent miscar-
riage. Surgical management. Int Congr Series 2004;1266:33542.
6. Pabuccu R, Gomel V. Reproductive outcome after hysteroscopic metro-
plasty in women with septate uterus and otherwise unexplained infertil-
ity. Fertil Steril 2004;81:16758.
7. Homer HA, Li TC, Cooke ID. The septate uterus: a review of manage-
ment and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 2000;73:113.
8. Colacurci N, De Placido G, Perino A, Mencaglia L, Gubbini G. Hystero-
scopic metroplasty. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1998;5:1714.
9. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop
Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and longterm
health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod
2004;19:417.
10. Revised American Fertility Society classication of endometriosis:
1985. Fertil Steril 1985;43:3512.
11. Fedele L, Arcaini L, Parazzini F, Vercellini P, Di Nola G. Reproductive
prognosis after hysteroscopic metroplasty in 102 women: life-table
analysis. Fertil Steril 1993;59:76872.
12. Grimbizis G, Camus M, Clasen K, Tournaye H, De munck L, Devroey P.
Hysteroscopic septum resection in patients with recurrent abortions or
infertility. Hum Reprod 1998;13:118893.
13. Colacurci N, De Placido G, Mollo A, Carravetta C, De Franciscis P.
Reproductive outcome after hysteroscopic metroplasty. Eur J Obstet Gy-
necol Reprod Biol 1996;66:14750.
14. Perino A, Mencaglia L, Hamou J, Cittadini E. Hysteroscopy for metro-
plasty of uterine septa: report of 24 cases. Fertil Steril 1987;48:3213.
15. Querleu D, Brasme TL, Parmentier D. Ultrasound-guided transcervical
metroplasty. Fertil Steril 1990;54:9958.
16. Marabini A, Gubbini G, Stagnozzi R, Stefanetti M, Filoni M,
Bovicelli A. Hysteroscopic metroplasty. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1994;734:
48892.
17. Daly DC, Mailer D, Soto-Albors C. Hysteroscopic metroplasty: six
years experience. Obstet Gynecol 1989;73:2015.
18. Pabuccu R, Atay V, Urman B, Ergun A, Orhon E. Hysteroscopic treat-
ment of septate uterus. Gynaecol Endosc 1995;4:2135.
19. Fayez JA. Comparison between abdominal and hysteroscopic metro-
plasty. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:399403.
20. Marcus S, al-Shawaf T, Brinsden P. The obstetric outcome of in vitro
fertilization and embryo transfer in women with congenital uterine mal-
formation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:859.
21. Lavergne N, Aristizabal J, Zarka V, Erny R, Hedon B. Uterine anomalies
and in vitro fertilization: what are the results? Eur J Obstet Gynecol
Reprod Biol 1996;68:2934.
22. Dabirashra H, Bahadori M, Mohammad K, Alavi M, Moghadami-
Tabrizi N, Zandinejad K, et al. Septate uterus: new idea on the histologic
features of the septum in this abnormal uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol
1995;171:1057.
23. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Marchini M, Franchi D, Tozzi L, Dorta M. Ultra-
structural aspects of endometriumin infertile women with septate uterus.
Fertil Steril 1996;65:7502.
24. Marwah V, Bhandari SK. Diagnostic and interventional microhystero-
scopy with use of the coaxial bipolar electrode system. Fertil Steril
2003;79:4137.
25. Colacurci N, De Franciscis P, Mollo A, Litta P, Perino A, Cobellis L,
et al. Small-diameter hysteroscopy with Versapoint versus resectoscopy
with a unipolar knife for the treatment of septate uterus: a prospective
randomized study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:6227.
Fertility and Sterility
2631