and Effectiveness Top Management Role in Organization Direction, Design, and Effectiveness CEO, Top Management Team External Environment Opportunities Threats Uncertainty Resource Availability Internal Environment Strengths Weaknesses Distinctive competence Leadership Style Past Performance Strategic Management Organization Design Effectiveness Outcomes Define mission, official goals Select operational goals, collaborative strategies Resources Efficiency Goal attainment Stakeholders Competing values Structural Form learning vs. efficiency Information and control systems Production technology Human resource policies, incentives Organizational culture Interorganizational linkages Source: Adapted from Arie Y. Lewin and Carroll U. Stephens, Individual Properties of the CEO as Determinants of Organization Design, unpublished manuscript, Duke University, 1990; and Arie Y. Lewin and Carroll U. Stephens, CEO Attributes as Determinants of Organization Design: An integrated Model, Organization Studies 15, no. 2 (1994): 183-212 Goal Type and Purpose
Type of Goals
Purpose of Goals
Official Goals, mission: Legitimacy
Operative goals: Employee direction and motivation Decision guidelines Standard of performance Porters Competitive Strategies Competitive Scope Competitive Emphasis
Strategy
Example
Broad
Low Cost Low-Cost Leadership
GoFly Ltd.
Broad
Uniqueness
Differentiation Starbucks Coffee Co.
Narrow
Low Cost Focused Low-Cost Leadership Enterprise Rent-a- Car
Narrow
Uniqueness Focused Differentiation Edward Jones Investments Miles and Snows Strategy Typology Prospector Learning orientation; flexible, fluid, decentralized structure Strong capability in research Values creativity, risk-taking, and innovation Defender Efficiency orientation; centralized authority and tight cost control Emphasis on production efficiency, low overhead Close supervision; little employee empowerment Source: Based on Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema, How Market Leaders Keep Their Edge, Fortune February 6, 1995, 88-98; Michael Hitt, R. Duane Ireland, and Robert E. Hoskisson, Strategic Management (St. Paul, Minn.: West, 1995), 100-113; and Raymond E. Miles, Charles c. Snow, Alan D. Meyer, and Henry L. Coleman, Jr., Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process, Academy of Management Review 3 (1978), 546-562 Miles and Snows Strategy Typology (contd) Analyzer Balances efficiency and learning; tight cost control with flexibility and adaptability Efficient production for stable product lines; emphasis on creativity, research, risk-taking for innovation Reactor No clear organizational approach; design characteristics may shift abruptly depending on current needs Source: Based on Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema, How Market Leaders Keep Their Edge, Fortune February 6, 1995, 88-98; Michael Hitt, R. Duane Ireland, and Robert E. Hoskisson, Strategic Management (St. Paul, Minn.: West, 1995), 100-113; and Raymond E. Miles, Charles c. Snow, Alan D. Meyer, and Henry L. Coleman, Jr., Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process, Academy of Management Review 3 (1978), 546-562 Contingency Factors Affecting Organization Design
Organizational Structure and Design
The right mix of design characteristics fit the contingency factors
Contingency Approaches to the Measurement of Organizational Effectiveness Organization
Internal activities and processes Resource Inputs Product and Service Outputs System resource approach Internal process approach Goal approach External Environment Reported Goals of U.S. Corporations Goal % Corporations Profitability 89 Growth 82 Market Share 66 Social Responsibility 65 Employee welfare 62 Product quality and service 60 Research and development 54 Diversification 51 Efficiency 50 Financial stability 49 Resource conservation 39 Management development 35 Source: Adapted from Y. K. Shetty, New Look at Corporate Goals, California Management Review 22, no. 2 (1979), pp. 71-19. Four Models of Effectiveness Values Human Relations Model
Goal values: human resource development Subgoals: cohesion, morale, training
Flexibility Control Internal External STRUCTURE F O C U S Adapted from Robert E. Quinn and John Rohrbaugh, A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Toward a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis, Management Science 29 (1983): 363-377; and Robert E. Quinn and Kim Cameron, Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence, Management Science 29 (1983): 33-51. Effectiveness Values for Two Organizations ORGANIZATION B ORGANIZATION A Human Relations Model Internal Process Model Rational Goal Model Open Systems Model STRUCTURE F O C U S FLEXIBILITY CONTROL INTERNAL EXTERNAL Identifying Company Goals and Strategies Goals from Exhibit 2.8 Strategies from Porter Company #1 Company #2 Company #3 Workbook Activity Competing Values and Organizational Effectiveness Workshop Activity Goal or subgoal Performance Gauge How to measure Source of data What do you consider effective? (Example) Equilibrium Turnover rates Compare percentages of workers who left HRM files 25% reduction in first year 1 Open System 2 3 Human Relations 4 5 Internal Process 6 7 Rational Goal 8