Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com/
Engineering Science
Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical
http://pic.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/12/14/0954406212471256
The online version of this article can be found at:
DOI: 10.1177/0954406212471256
online 14 December 2012
published Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
Moustafa Elshafei and Mohamed A. Habib
Softsensor for Estimation of Steam Quality in Riser Tubes of Boilers
- Oct 15, 2013 version of this article was published on more recent A
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
http://pic.sagepub.com/subscriptions Subscriptions:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Reprints:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Permissions:
What is This?
_ m
fw
_ m
s
Q _ m
fw
h
fw
_ m
s
h
s
Q
r
h
s
_ m
dc
s
T
d
V
0
sd
V
sd
h
fw
h
w
h
s
_ m
fw
2
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
4
3
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
5
1
The model derived parameters are given by
a
12
w
s
2
a
11
V
wt
@
w
@p
V
st
@
s
@p
3
a
22
w
h
w
s
h
s
4
a
21
V
wt
h
w
@
w
@p
w
@h
w
@p
V
st
h
s
@
s
@p
s
@h
s
@p
V
t
m
t
C
p
@t
s
@p
5
a
31
w
@h
w
@p
r
h
c
@
w
@p
1
v
V
r
1
r
h
c
@
s
@p
s
@h
s
@p
v
V
r
r
h
c
V
r
@
v
@p
V
r
m
r
C
p
@t
s
@p
6
a
33
1
r
w
h
c
V
r
@
v
@
r
7
a
41
V
sd
@
s
@p
1
h
c
s
V
sd
@h
@p
w
V
wd
@h
w
@p
V
sd
V
wd
m
d
C
p
@t
s
@p
r
1V
r
v
@
s
p
1
v
@
w
@p
s
@
v
@p
8
e
43
r
1
s
w
V
r
@
v
@
r
9
Figure 1. Schematic picture of the boiler.
4 Proc IMechE Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 0(0)
at KING FAHD UNIV on October 13, 2014 pic.sagepub.com Downloaded from
XML Template (2012) [14.12.201210:34am] [111]
K:/PIC/PIC 471256.3d (PIC) [PREPRINTER stage]
e
44
s
10
q
2
dc
2
w
A
dc
s
g
v
V
r
k
11
v
w
s
1
s
r
ln 1
r
12
The model is highly nonlinear, and the available state-
dependant measurements are basically the drum level
and the drum pressure. With only these two process
variable outputs, the application of conventional state
estimation can be very dicult and computationally
expensive for online estimation. Although the drum
temperature is also available, it is directly related to
the drum pressure.
Artificial NNs
ANNs are composed of signal processing elements
called neurons. The neurons are interconnected and
the strength of the interconnections is denoted by
parameters called synaptic weights. The model of a
neuron is as shown in Figure 2, where x
1
, x
2
, . . . , x
p
are the input signals, w
k1
, w
k2
, . . . , w
kp
the synaptic
weights of neuron k, w
k0
the bias, v
k
the linear com-
biner output, f(.) an activation function, and y
k
the
output signal of the neuron.
In mathematical terms, the kth neuron is
described as
30
v
k
X
p
j1
w
kj
x
j
w
k0
y
k
f v
k
13
The activation function, f(.), denes the output of a
neuron in terms of the activity level at its input.
There are several classes of ANNs structures. The
most common structure of ANN is known as feedfor-
ward neural networks (FFNNs). FFNNs are com-
posed of layers of interconnected neurons. Usually,
an input layer, a number of hidden layers, and an
output layer are used, as shown in Figure 3.
30
input
layer is essentially a direct link to the inputs of the rst
w
k0
w
k1
w
k2
w
kp
f (.)
V
k
y
k
x
1
x
2
x
p
1
Biase
Summing
Junction
Activation
function
Synaptic
weights
Neuron
Figure 2. Model of a neuron.
S
S
S
f
f
f
S
S
S
f
f
f
S
S
S
f
f
f
y
1
y
2
y
3
u
1
u
2
Input
Layer
First Hidden
Layer
Second Hidden
Layer
Output
Layer
Figure 3. Multi-layer FFNN.
FFNN: feedforward neural network.
Elshafei and Habib 5
at KING FAHD UNIV on October 13, 2014 pic.sagepub.com Downloaded from
XML Template (2012) [14.12.201210:34am] [111]
K:/PIC/PIC 471256.3d (PIC) [PREPRINTER stage]
hidden layer. The output of each neuron may be con-
nected to the inputs of all the neurons in the next
layer. Signals are unidirectional, i.e. they ow only
from input to output.
The potential of FFNN as a basis for the modeling,
classication, and statistical estimation stems from
the following characteristics. Each neuron (processing
unit) has a nonlinear activation function that enables
the modeling of any underlying nonlinearity or com-
plex relations in physical processes. Due to the feed-
forward structure, the training of the network is
simple and can be made to adapt to varying condi-
tions. In a multi-layer NN, each neuron in a particular
layer is connected to a large number of source neurons
in the previous layer. This form of global interconnec-
tivity has the potential to be fault-tolerant. If a neuron
or its synaptic links are damaged, the quality of pre-
dicting the output behavior will not be seriously
degraded. For a sucient number of hidden units,
FFNNs can approximate any continuous static
inputoutput mapping to any desired degree of
approximation.
30,31
The back propagation (BP) algo-
rithm is usually used for (FFNN) training. The most
popular version of BP algorithms is Levenberg
Marquardt (LM).
32
The LM algorithm outperforms
simple gradient descent and other conjugate gradient
methods in a wide variety of problems. LM has
become very popular due to its relative ease of imple-
mentation and its ability to converge promptly from a
wide range of initial guesses.
Results and discussion
Boiler dynamic results
The industrial boiler used in the present investigation
has the data and operating conditions, as presented in
Table 1. These data are at the maximum continuous
rating (MCR). The boiler (Figure 1) was connected
with other boilers to a common steam header along
with the steam coming from the cogeneration unit.
Due to an upset in the gas turbine steam cogeneration
unit, the header pressure dropped. The boiler control
system reacts to meet the demand in steam, as
reected in the plot of Figure 4(a) which presents
the time variations in the steam ow rate of the
boiler. The increase in the steam load causes pressure
drop in the boiler drum and increase in the feedwater,
which results in decrease in the delivery of steam,
causing the exhibited oscillatory response.
The boiler model and the parameters of the control
system were tted to data obtained from an actual
boiler of 208 MW at MCR.
33
The model was vali-
dated by comparing the response of the model and
the actual boiler during normal operation and
during a short upset period shown in Figure 4. The
top plot (Figure 4(a)) presents the actual steam load
during the upset period, while the following plots
show the actual boiler response versus the tted
model response. The results of the feedwater ow
rate (Figure 4(b)) and the heating power (Figure
4(c)) show that the model provides good agreement
with the actual boiler. The dierence between the
actual heating power and simulated power in the
steady-state region is due to the heat absorbed in
the economizer, the energy loss in the water blow-
down, and radiation.
Simulation results
The simulation model described in Articial NNs is
used to assess the performance of the boiler under
various operating conditions. In particular, the
model is used to generate operating conditions for
building a simplied NN based softsensor for estimat-
ing the riser tube steam quality. The inputs for the
NN are presented in Table 2. The normal boiler
operating conditions considered in the present simu-
lation are _ m
s
45 kg/s, steam power 92 MW,
pressure 4990 kPa, V
sd
4.14 m
3
, and
V
wt
57.73 m
3
. The steam load proles for training
and testing of the NN are shown in Figure 5 and
cover a wide range of operations and rate of change.
Several NN structures were tested with various
numbers of neurons in the hidden layer, as presented
in Table 3. The number of neurons was taken to be 10,
15, and 20. All cases were tested using 100 epochs. All
NNs have tansig functions in the hidden layer and
logsig function in the output layer. The performance
of the tested NNs is summarized also in Table 3. Table
3 clearly shows that networks 2 and 3 gave the best
performance on the test data. However, network 3
was selected because it has less number of weights.
The performance of this network, based on the test
data, is shown in Figure 6 and indicates close agree-
ment between the simulated and predicted results for
the steam volume fraction. The correlation coecient
is better than 0.998. The corresponding simulated and
predicted results of the steam mass quality and the
water ow rate in the downcomers are shown in
Figure 7. Agreement between simulated and predicted
results of these two parameters is indicated.
Table 1. Boiler data and typical operating conditions.
Maximum continuous steam power (MCR) 208 MW
Drum saturation pressure 4996.6 kPa
Drum saturation temperature 263.9
C
Header super steam pressure 4490 kPa
Super heater temperature 411
C
Energy loss to stack 18.5%
Energy absorption in superheater 12.7%
Energy absorption in economizer 7.8%
Natural gas fuel LHV 39.8 MJ/kg
The energy absorbed by the system
of the risers, downcomers, and drum
61%
MCR: maximum continuous rating.
6 Proc IMechE Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 0(0)
at KING FAHD UNIV on October 13, 2014 pic.sagepub.com Downloaded from
XML Template (2012) [14.12.201210:34am] [111]
K:/PIC/PIC 471256.3d (PIC) [PREPRINTER stage]
Two more NNs were built to estimate the risers
mass steam quality, and the downcomers water ow
rate. Both NNs have the same structure; 5 inputs, 1
hidden layer of 10 neurons, and 1 output. The per-
formance of the two NNs is shown in Figure 8. The
NN for estimating the steam mass quality achieved a
maximum absolute error of 1.46% and root mean
squared error (RMSE) of 0.59% on the testing data.
On the other hand, the NN for estimating the down-
comer water ow rate achieves 1.16% maximum
absolute error, and RMSE of 0.51%.
As the steam demand increases, the pressure in the
steam drum drops below the corresponding saturation
temperature. As a result, steam evaporation increases,
causing high steam quality, as shown by the solid line
in Figure 6. The simulated volume steam fraction is
re-plotted in Figure 8 for the average of all the 560
riser tubes. Another plot is shown also in Figure 8
presenting the steam volume fraction for the case of
the highest heat ux. According to study in Saudi
ARAMCO,
33
the heat ux is not the same for all
tubes. The ux intensity can vary over a ratio of 2.5
for tubes closer to the ame as compared to tubes
away from the ame. As such, the tubes closer to
the ame can have a ux intensity double the average
heat ux over all tubes. Since the steam quality is
directly proportional to the heat ux intensity, the
steam quality is of at least 40% more. In the tubes
closer to the ame front or subjected to direct
0 20 40 60 80 100
45
50
55
60
65
70
75 (a)
(b)
(c)
Steam flow rate
Time in minutes
Steam flow rate during load upset
Actual and simulated (dotted) feed
water flow rate
Firing power (actual) versus the
simulated heating power
S
t
e
a
m
f
l
o
w
r
a
t
e
i
n
k
g
/
s
e
c
0 20 40 60 80 100
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
Feed water flow rate, red=actual, blue=simulation
F
e
e
d
w
a
t
e
r
r
a
t
e
i
n
k
g
/
s
e
c
Time in Minutes
0 20 40 60 80 100
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
Input Power, red=actual, blue=simulation
P
o
w
e
r
i
n
M
W
Time in minutes
Figure 4. Validation of the simulation model against the boiler measurements (solid line, actual; dotted line, simulation).
Table 2. Operating range of the NN inputs.
Variables
Range of
variables
1 Riser/downcomer heat Q(t) and
Q(t 1) (kJ/s)
0200 MW
2 Steam flow rate m
s
(t) and m
s
(t 1) (kg/s) 090 kg/s
3 Pressure P(t) and P(t 1) (kPa) 40006500 kPa
4 Drum level L(t) and L(t 1) (m) 5575 cm
5 Feedwater rate m
fw
(t) and m
fw
(t 1) (kg/s) 0110 kg/s
NN: neural network.
Elshafei and Habib 7
at KING FAHD UNIV on October 13, 2014 pic.sagepub.com Downloaded from
XML Template (2012) [14.12.201210:34am] [111]
K:/PIC/PIC 471256.3d (PIC) [PREPRINTER stage]
0 10 20 30 40
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55 (a) (b)
Time in minutes
S
t
e
a
m
v
o
l
u
m
e
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
Prediction of steam volume ratio
Predicted
Simulated
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
Targets
N
N
o
u
t
p
u
t
Testing Performance of the Neural Network
Figure 6. (a) Steam volume quality; blue (dotted line): simulated; red (solid line): predicted and (b) predicted versus simulated values.
(b) (a)
Steam load for testing
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
S
t
e
a
m
D
e
m
a
n
d
i
n
k
g
/
s
e
c
Time (minutes)
Steam load for training the ANN
0 10 20 30 40
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Time in minutes
S
t
e
a
m
f
l
o
w
r
a
t
e
i
n
k
g
/
s
e
c
Figure 5. Steam flow rate for training (a) and testing (b) of the NN.
NN: neural network.
Table 3. Summary of the NNs performance.
Number of neurons
in the hidden layer Training MSE (10
6
) Testing MSE (10
4
)
Maximum absolute
error (testing)
1 5101 4.6062 31 0.1414
2 10101 4.27 0.3766 0.0207
3 5151 4.0132 0.4324 0.0155
4 10151 3.7889 355 0.6424
5 5201 2.4283 683 0.7501
6 10201 3.7 11 0.2018
NNs: neural networks; MSE: mean squared error.
8 Proc IMechE Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 0(0)
at KING FAHD UNIV on October 13, 2014 pic.sagepub.com Downloaded from
XML Template (2012) [14.12.201210:34am] [111]
K:/PIC/PIC 471256.3d (PIC) [PREPRINTER stage]
impingement of high temperature gases. A volume
steam quality of 78% is considered critical to avoid
thermal stress. Figure 8 can be used as a guide for the
operator to insure safe operation of the boiler. The
dotted line of Figure 8 indicates the predicted condi-
tion of the steam volume fraction of the tubes having
the highest heat ux intensity. The horizontal line rep-
resents a critical level that should be avoided to pre-
vent thermal stresses in the riser pipes, and possible
damage of pipes. The gure indicates that the highest
steam quality occurs between 20 and 27 min and cor-
responds to that of the steam ow rate of Figure 5(b).
In this region, the predicted steam volume quality
exhibits the worst situation where it gets closer to
the maximum value of 78%. Although other alterna-
tive NNs could also be considered for estimating
steam quality, e.g. support vector machines, radial
basis functions, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference
system, the basic FFNN used in this study was su-
cient to prove the concept and provided satisfactory
results at low complexity. Future study may investi-
gate the use of other NNs and compare them from
computational cost, generalization capability, and
eectiveness in steam quality softsensing.
0 10 20 30 40
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Time in minutes
P
r
e
d
i
c
t
e
d
S
t
e
a
m
v
o
l
u
m
e
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
Critical limit of Steam volume quality
Average heat flux
Highest heat flux
Unsafe Limit
Figure 8. Critical steam volume fractions.
0 10 20 30 40
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035 (a)
(b)
Time in minutes
S
t
e
a
m
M
a
s
s
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
Prediction of steam mass ratio
Predicted
Simulated
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
2000
2200
2400
2600
2800
3000
3200
3400
Time in minutes
W
a
t
e
r
F
l
o
w
r
a
t
e
q
d
c
(
m
3
/
s
e
c
)
Down Comer water flow rate qdc
Predicted
Simulated
Figure 7. (a) Prediction of steam mass quality and (b) prediction of the downcomer flow rate.
Elshafei and Habib 9
at KING FAHD UNIV on October 13, 2014 pic.sagepub.com Downloaded from
XML Template (2012) [14.12.201210:34am] [111]
K:/PIC/PIC 471256.3d (PIC) [PREPRINTER stage]
Conclusions
The article proposed an ANN softsensor for estimat-
ing the riser tubes steam quality. The model was vali-
dated with the results of a nonlinear dynamic model.
ANNs are easy to use for online monitoring of boiler
performance instead of using a full nonlinear model.
NNs are also used to estimate the water circulation in
the boiler instead of using nonlinear state estimator.
The critical regions of possible tube overheating were
reasonably predicted by the present model. The avail-
ability of predicted steam quality improves boiler
operation and safety, and reduces boilers downtime
and maintenance cost.
Funding
The authors acknowledge the support provided by King
Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology through the
Science and Technology Unit at King Fahd University of
Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) for funding this study
through project NSTIP# 04-ENV59-08, as part of the
National Science, Technology and Innovation Plan. They
also thank KFUPM for its support of this study.
References
1. Astrom KJ and Eklund K. A simplified non-linear
model of a drum boiler-turbine unit. Int J Control
1972; 16: 145169.
2. Unbehauen H and Kocaarslan I. Experimental model-
ling and adaptive power control of a 750 MV once-
through boiler. In: Proceedings of the preprints IFAC
11th world congress on automatic control, Tallinn,
Estonia, 1317 August 1990, vol. 11, pp.3237.
3. Kwatny HG and Berg J. Drum level regulation at all
loads. In: Proceedings of the IFAC 12th world congress,
Sydney, Australia, 1923 July 1993, vol. 3, pp.405408.
4. Astrom KJ and Bell RD. Drum boiler dynamics.
Automatica 2000; 36: 363378.
5. Flynn ME and OMalley MJ. A drum boiler model for
long term power system dynamic simulation. IEEE
Trans Power Syst 1999; 14: 209217.
6. Dong Y and Tingkuan C. HGSSP-A computer pro-
gram for simulation of once-through boiler start-up
behavior. Heat Transfer Eng 2001; 22(5): 5060.
7. Kim H and Choi S. A model on water level dynamics in
natural circulation drum-type boilers. Int Commun Heat
Mass Transfer 2005; 32: 786796.
8. Wolf AL and Neill TE. Thermal shock. Application
Engineering/Technical Services, Heating and Cooling
Technology, 2006, pp.16.
9. Kudryavtsev IV, Burmistrova LN, Maminov AS, et al.
Fatigue testing of boiler steels under an asym-
metric stress range. J Strength Mater 1970; 2(2):
183186. (translated from Problemy Prochnosti (2):
7780).
10. Kruger K, Rode M and Franke R. Optimal control for
fast boiler start-up based on a non-linear model and
considering the thermal stress on thick-walled compo-
nents. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international confer-
ence on control applications, Mexico City, Mexico, 57
September 2001, pp.570576.
11. Kruger K, Franke R and Rode M. Optimization of
boiler start-up using a nonlinear boiler model and
hard constraints. Energy 2004; 29: 22392251.
12. Emara-Shabaik HE, Habib MA and Al-Zaharna I.
Prediction of risers tubes temperature in water tube
boilers. Appl Math Modell 2009; 33: 13231336.
13. Habib MA, Al-Zaharnah I, Ayinde T, et al. Influence of
boiler swing rate on dynamics of thermal and flow char-
acteristics in water circulation boilers. Comput Therm
Sci 2011; 3(6): 483500.
14. Wallace J and Clarke R. The application of Kalman
filtering estimation techniques in power station control
systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1983; 28: 416427.
15. Lo KL, Song ZM, Marchand E, et al. Modelling and
state estimation of power station boilers. Part I: model-
ling. Int J Electr Power Syst Res 1990a; 18: 175189.
16. Lo KL, Song ZM, Marchand E, et al. Modelling and
state estimation of power station boilers. Part II: appli-
cation. Int J Electr Power Syst Res 1990b; 18: 191203.
17. Lu S and Hogg BW. Dynamic nonlinear modelling of
power plant by physical principles and neural networks.
Electr Power Energy Syst 2000; 22: 6778.
18. Julier SJ and Uhlmann JK. Unscented filtering and
nonlinear estimation. Proc IEEE 2004; 92: 401422.
19. Lo KL and Rathamarit Y. State estimation of a boiler
model using the unscented Kalman filter. IET Gener
Transm Distrib 2008; 2(6): 917931.
20. Keeler JD and Ferguson RB. Commercial applications
of soft sensors: the virtual online analyzer and the soft-
ware CEM. In: Proceedings of IFAC conference, San
Francisco, CA, 30 June5 July 1996.
21. Martin GD. Consider soft sensors. Chem Eng Prog
1997; 7: 6670.
22. Wang X, Luo R and Shao H. Designing a soft sensor
for distillation column with the fuzzy distributed radial
basis function neural network. In: Proceedings of IEEE
35th conference on decision and control, Kobe, 1113
December 1996, pp.17141719.
23. Traver ML, Atkinson RJ and Atkinson CM. Neural
network-based diesel engine emissions prediction using
in-cylinder combustion pressure. In: Proceedings of the
international spring fuels and lubricants meeting and
exposition, Dearborn, MI, 36 May 1999.
24. Elshafei M, Habib MA and Al-Dajani M. Prediction of
boilers emissions using polynomial networks. In: IEEE
electrical and computer engineering Canadian conference,
Ottawa, ON, 710 May 2006, pp.823827.
25. Elshafei M, Habib MA and Al-Dajani M. Influence of
combustion parameters on NOx production in an
industrial boiler. J Comput Fluid 2008; 37(1): 1223.
26. Shakil M, Elshafei M, Habib MA, et al. Soft sensor for
NOx emission using dynamic neural network. J Comput
Electr Eng 2009; 35(4): 527608.
27. Ilamathi P, Selladurai V and Balamurugan K.
Predictive modelling and optimization of power plant
nitrogen oxides emission. IAES Int J Artif Intell 2012;
1(1): 1118.
28. Hosseini SB, Bashirnezhad K, Moghiman AR, et al.
Experimental comparison of combustion characteristic
and pollutant emission of gas oil and biodiesel. World
Academy Sci Eng Technol 2010; 72: 304307.
29. Shuangchen M. Simulation on SO
2
and NO
X
emission
from coalfired power plants in North-Eastern North
America. Energy Power Eng 2010; 2: 190195.
10 Proc IMechE Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 0(0)
at KING FAHD UNIV on October 13, 2014 pic.sagepub.com Downloaded from
XML Template (2012) [14.12.201210:34am] [111]
K:/PIC/PIC 471256.3d (PIC) [PREPRINTER stage]
30. Haykin S. Neural networks and learning machines. 3rd
edn. New York: Prentice Hall, 2009.
31. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M and White H. Multilayer
feed-forward network are universal approximators.
Neural Networks 1989; 2: 359366.
32. Hagan MT and Menhaj M. Training feedforward net-
works with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans
Neural Networks 1994; 5: 989993.
33. Saudi ARAMCO. Determination of maximum boiler
swing rate. Project Report, Saudi ARAMCO project
no. 2277, Mechanical Engineering Department, Saudi
ARAMCO, May 2007December 2009. Dhahran:
Saudi ARAMCO.
Appendix
Notation
A steam quality
C
p
specific heat of metal
h
fg
specific condensation enthalpy
h
fg
h
g
h
f
h
fw
specific enthalpy of feedwater
h
s
specific enthalpy of steam leaving the
boiler
h
w
specific enthalpy of saturated water
H
w
specific enthalpy of saturated liquid
water
L
s
level variation caused by the steam in
the drum
L
w
level variations caused by changes of
the amount of water in the drum
_ m
cd
the condensation flow in the drum
_ m
dc
the downcomer mass flow rate
_ m
fw
mass flow rate of feedwater supplied to
the drum
_ m
r
the flow rate out of the risers
_ m
s
mass flow rate of steam exiting the
boiler
_ m
sd
steam flow rate through the liquid sur-
face in the drum
P drum pressure (kPa)
Q
:
heat flow rate to the risers
V
d
drum volume
V
dc
downcomer volume
V
r
volume of riser tubes
V
sd
volume of steam under the liquid level
in the drum
V
0
sd
the volume of steam in the drum in the
hypothetical situation when there is no
condensation of steam in the drum
V
st
total volume of steam in the system
V
t
the total volume of the drum, downco-
mer, and risers; V
t
V
st
V
wt
V
wd
volume of water under the liquid level
V
wt
total volume of water in the system
average volume fraction of steam in the
riser
v
steam volume fraction in the riser tubes
exit
g
density of saturated steam
s
saturated steam density
w
saturated water density
Elshafei and Habib 11
at KING FAHD UNIV on October 13, 2014 pic.sagepub.com Downloaded from