2014 PA Gov. Tom Corbett on Child Protection in Pennsylvania - Center for Children's Justice 2014 Gubernatorial Questionnaire - Corbett Reply 28Oct14
Original Title
2014 PA Gov. Tom Corbett on Child Protection in Pennsylvania - Center for Children's Justice 2014 Gubernatorial Questionnaire - Corbett Reply 28Oct14
Governor Tom Corbett 1.) In light of the number and diversity of programs, services and funding streams within the jurisdiction and oversight of the current Department of Public Welfare; how will you meaningfully use the Office of Governor to prioritize the safety, well-being and permanency of Pennsylvanias infants, children and youth?
Over the last four years, my administration has saved nearly $2 billion by fighting waste, fraud, and abuse in the Department of Public Welfare. This has allowed us to ensure that more funds are available to provide services for our most vulnerable, including children, the elderly, and people with physical or intellectual disabilities. In my second term I will continue this focus, and will look for more ways to direct funding to the vulnerable, including children. 2.) How will you meaningfully use the Office of Governor to promote inter-disciplinary, public/private, and evidence-based strategies to reduce a childs exposure to Adverse Childhood Experiences, including child abuse and neglect? I spent most of my adult life as a prosecutor, where I dedicated myself toward fighting abuse, protecting children, and putting child predators behind bars. I have continued this as Governor. I have worked with the General Assembly to enact bipartisan laws to strengthen our states child protection laws. These bills have included a broadening of the definition of child abuser as it pertains to barring dangerous individuals from employment in childcare, creating a statewide database to enable quicker information sharing in child abuse cases, and creating new funding streams for Childrens Advocacy Centers. I am pleased of the work we have gotten done on this issue, and look forward to continuing this effort in partnership with the legislature.
3.) Within your early childhood care and education plan, do you have specific strategies and outcome measures to improve the safety, health (including mental health), and permanency for children from birth to age three? Please highlight how these strategies are intended to strengthen the confidence and competence of parents, who are a childs first protector and teacher. I am extremely proud of signing the new pass the trash bill last week, Act 168, to ensure that our educators are the most well-vetted child care professionals in the nation. With these protections in place, I am more confident that our professionals in early education are Paid for by Tom Corbett for Governor
in a better place to work with parents and care-givers to secure a safe and productive future for our children.
4.) Will you support designating a portion of the fee charged by the PA State Police for a criminal background check ($10) and by the Department of Public Welfare for its child abuse history check ($10) toward evidence-based child abuse and neglect prevention services/programs? YES.
5.) What is your actionable plan to reduce child abuse fatalities and near fatalities? One of my proudest accomplishments as a public official has been the creation of the Child Protection Unit within the Office of Attorney General. During my tenure, we had more than 250 arrests for charges related to child predation with a 100% conviction rate. Regardless of that work, when I was inaugurated as governor there was clearly more work yet to be done in terms of cleaning up Pennsylvania statutes and protocols to ensure that potential predators could not be in a position to seek out victims among our public school students. It is for that reason that I facilitated the creation of the Task Force on Child Protection, which resulted in a series of recommendations to enhance our legal protections for children, and a dozen new laws to protect our kids.
6.) What would you identify as the strengths of Act 33 of 2008 and what, if any, weaknesses would you identify within Act 33 of 2008? Act 33 was effective in identifying DPW as having primary responsibility for creating a centralized, consolidated report in the case of a child fatality or near fatality to help direct an investigation in the case where an incident has already taken place, but provided little with regard to tools to prevent child abuse from happening in the first place. I am very proud of the legislation Ive worked to get to my desk as a recommendation of the Task Force on Child Protection, which has accomplished initiatives such as clarifying provisions for mandated reporters, enhancing criminal penalties for perpetrators of child abuse and child pornography, streamlining processing of child abuse investigations and increasing dollars for Child Advocacy Centers. I am also very pleased that just five days ago I was able to sign HB 1816, having received unanimous affirmative votes in both the House and the Senate. HB 1816, now Act 168 known as the pass the trash bill, was the remaining piece of legislation recommended by the Task Force that had remained to be signed. Act 168 helps to ensure that educators who have been accused or investigated for sexual abuse against their students cannot simply retreat to another school or district in order to preserve their access to potential victims.
Paid for by Tom Corbett for Governor
7.) How do you intend to monitor and measure the implantation of these 2013-2014 comprehensive policy and practice changes, especially around key provisions (e.g. consistency in reporting suspected child abuse and ensuring multidisciplinary investigation teams operate with the protocol required by state law)? I believe it is imperative that state government (Office of the Governor, Department of Public Welfare, Pennsylvania State Police and Attorney General) work in partnership with law enforcement and other relevant stakeholders to monitor the implementation of recent policies changes. Since each entity possesses unique insight on the effectiveness of certain statutory provisions, it is critical that we work in a collaborative fashion to identify areas that may require additional support or modification. It is too early to judge the lasting consequences of these recent changes, but I believe we have set the foundation for a more uniform reporting structure for investigating suspected child abuse cases.
8.) Will you initiate an independent audit of ChildLine in order to analyze the hotlines staffing trends (e.g. number of staff, turnover rates, use of overtime) and the recent implementation of modern technology? YES.
9.) How will your administration build upon Pennsylvanias recent statutory decision to dedicate state funding for childrens advocacy centers? My administration will continue working in partnership with the General Assembly and stakeholders to ensure the Commonwealth is fully investing in the creation of childrens advocacy centers. It is my belief that these centers provide an invaluable resource to Pennsylvanias children and must be preserved at all costs.
10.) Do you support regularly updated (e.g. every 2 years) criminal and child abuse background checks conducted by the Pennsylvania State Police and the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) for volunteers and paid employees having regular contact with a child? YES.
11.) Do you support a federal criminal background check conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for individuals who want to work or volunteer with Pennsylvania children but the person has not lived in PA continuously for the last 10 years? YES.
Paid for by Tom Corbett for Governor
12.) Do you support a state-level independent Child Protection Ombudsmen or what some refer to as the Child Protection Advocate? Yes. I believe the establishment of an independent Child Protection Advocate will serve a critical function in coordinating and implementing child protection programs across agencies. While the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has been a national leader in mitigating violence against children, we must continue to evolve and enhance strategies for eliminating child abuse. Therefore, the creation of a Child Protection Advocate will be an essential resource for expanding outreach programs and educating all Pennsylvanians on this critical topic. It is my belief that the establishment of such an office would require legislative authorization. This action will ensure no future governor can unilaterally eliminate the position, as well as provide the General Assembly with a vested interest in enhancing the program.
13.) Do you support changes to Pennsylvanias criminal and civil statute of limitations in child sexual abuse cases, specifically would you sign the following legislation as Governor of the Commonwealth: a. To eliminate the criminal statute of limitation? YES. b. To eliminate the civil statute of limitation? YES. c. To extend the civil limitations in child sexual abuse cases until the child victim reaches the age of 50? YES. d. To permit a time-limited (e.g. 2 year) retroactive window for filing a civil claim with this option available to child sexual abuse survivors previously barred by existing SOLs? YES.
PROBLEM STATEMENT: Too often Pennsylvanias child protection policies, practices, and funding have been sequestered to a single state agency undercutting intentional, inter-disciplinary and routinely measured prevention and intervention strategies. A further complication is that the majority of funding for and oversight of Pennsylvanias child protection policies and practices are housed within the Department of Public Welfare. Even when DPW is renamed the Department of Human Services (DHS), it is likely to remain an agency that is targeted for budget cuts, including those that will impact the workforce responsible to implement and to continuously monitor and measure the quality of PAs child protection strategies. QUESTION #1 In light of the number and diversity of programs, services and funding streams within the jurisdiction and oversight of the current Department of Public Welfare; how will you meaningfull y use the Office of Governor to prioritize the safety, well- being and permanency of Pennsyl vanias infants, children and youth?
PROBLEM STATEMENT: Recent studies have demonstrated that Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs), such as child abuse and neglect and exposure to other forms of violence, can be toxic stressors that lead to lifelong consequences (e.g., chronic and costly physical and mental health problems). It remains extremely difficult to identify or analyze Pennsylvanias investment in prevention and specific positive outcomes for infants, children and youth. Service categories are not clearly identified, budgeted funds are not designated, and service planning and delivery for prevention services are rarely documented on either case-specific or agency-budget levels. As a result, meaningful oversight, consolidation, and efforts to improve prevention-focused services are frustrated. QUESTION #2 How will you meaningfull y use the Office of Governor to promote inter-disciplinary, public/private, and evidence-based strategies to reduce a childs exposure to Adverse Childhood Experiences, including child abuse and neglect?
QUESTION #3 Within your earl y childhood care and education plan, do you have specific strategies and outcome measures to improve the safety, health (including mental health), and permanency for children from birth to age three? Please highlight how these strategies are intended to strengthen the confidence and competence of parents, who are a childs first protector and teacher.
1 | G u b e r n a t o r i a l Q u e s t i o n n a i r e w w w . C 4 C J . o r g
QUESTION #4 Will you support designating a portion of the fee charged by the PA State Police for a criminal background check ($10) and by the Department of Public Welfare for its child abuse history check ($10) toward evidence-based child abuse and neglect prevention services/programs? _____ Yes _____No
PROBLEM STATEMENT: Between 2008 and 2012, Pennsylvania recorded at least 175 child abuse fatalities with nearly 80 percent involving a child who was three years of age or younger. An additional 225 Pennsylvania children experienced a child abuse near-fatality and 84 percent of these sentinel events involved a child three years of age or younger. The challenges faced by children and their families do not exist in isolation even as they can be isolating. The complex needs and realities of infants and families with young children can lead to involvement with a number of publicly funded systems, well beyond the traditional child welfare system. Coexistent risk factors make multi-system interventions challenging and too rarely is the response holistic, preventative, or strength-based. There are powerful human and economic incentives to work with intention across disciplines and all child-serving systems toward improved safety, well-being and permanence for every Pennsylvania infant and child. There is also incentive to determine whether Act 33 of 2008, which requires local and state-level timely reviews and publicly released reports when a child dies from suspected or substantiated child abuse, has proven itself an effective prevention tool. QUESTION #5 What is your actionable plan to reduce child abuse fatalities and near fatalities? Please provide some brief outline of the components of this plan. If you do not have a plan, please explain why not.
QUESTION #6 What would you identify as the strengths of Act 33 of 2008 and what, if any, weaknesses would you identify within Act 33 of 2008?
PROBLEM STATEMENT: Pennsylvania receives reports of suspected child abuse via a 24-hour reporting hotline known as ChildLine. The state hotline is staffed by specially trained workers. In 2013, ChildLine answered 142,084 calls an increase of more than 20,000 calls when compared with 2010. The Task Force on Child Protections November 2012 report addressed the importance of ChildLine staffing levels and retention issues. In 2012, Pennsylvania investigated reports at a rate of 8.6 per 1,000 children; nationally it was 42 per 1,000 children. One out of every thousand children in our Commonwealth was determined to be a victim of child abuse, while nationally it exceeded 9 per 1,000 children. Responding to this outlier status, the General Assembly legislatively created the Task Force on Child Protection. Beginning in 2013, more than twenty pieces of legislation were enacted largely following this Task Forces recommendations related to defining, reporting and investigating child abuse. Included in these changes was dedicated funding for state-of-the-art childrens advocacy centers. Still, there is unfinished business, including decisions about a childs access to high quality medical exams and on-going counseling and victim services. Also, undecided is which individuals should submit to background checks and how regularly these checks should occur. QUESTION #7 How do you intend to monitor and measure the implementation of these 2013/2014 comprehensive policy and practice changes, especiall y around key provisions (e.g., consistency in reporting suspected child abuse and ensuring multidisciplinary investigation teams operate with the protocol required by state law)?
2 | G u b e r n a t o r i a l Q u e s t i o n n a i r e w w w . C 4 C J . o r g
QUESTION #8 Will you initiate an independent audit of ChildLine in order to anal yze the hotlines staffing trends (e.g., number of staff, turnover rates, use of overtime) and the recent implementation of modern technology? _____Yes _____ NO
QUESTION #9 How will your administration build upon Pennsyl vanias recent statutory decision to dedicate state funding for childrens advocacy centers?
QUESTION #10a Do you support regularl y updated (e.g., every 2 years) criminal and child abuse background checks conducted by the Pennsyl vania State Police and the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) for volunteers and paid employees having regular contact with a child? _____Yes _____ No
QUESTION #10b Do you support a federal criminal background check conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for indi viduals who want to work or volunteer with Pennsyl vania children but the person has not lived in PA continuousl y for the last ten years? _____Yes _____ No
PROBLEM STATEMENT: Pennsylvania children, youth and families benefit from child-welfare services delivered by public and private providers as part of a state-supervised and county-administered system that has many strengths. Unfortunately, too often the child welfare system does not function as needed to effectively assess and assure the safety of a child as well as guard the rights of parents, children and alleged perpetrators. Decisions made and public resources spent have a profound impact on the safety, liberty and custody of children and families. Mechanisms to respond to child-welfare complaints or to report concerns about specific decisions for an individual child or a class of children exist within the Department of Public Welfare, the county child welfare agencies and their contractors. This presents an obvious lack of objectivity and independence as well as impacts public confidence in this system. QUESTION #11 Do you support a state-level independent Child Protection Ombudsman or what some refer to as the Child Protection Advocate? _____ Yes _____ No
If yes, please explain how you see this office developing during your administration (e.g., by executive order or legislation, as an office of state government or through a contract with an independent entity).
If you do not support the Ombudsman/Advocate, please explain how your administration will assure meaningful independent complaint resolution within Pennsylvanias child welfare system.
PROBLEM STATEMENT: Recently the New York Times Editorial Board acknowledged a central lesson of the Gerald Sandusky serial child sexual abuse scandal - It can take years before victims are emotionally and psychologically ready to come forward. Pennsylvanias criminal statute of limitation 3 | G u b e r n a t o r i a l Q u e s t i o n n a i r e w w w . C 4 C J . o r g
(SOL) in child sexual abuse cases is generally until the child victim reaches the age of 50, while the civil SOL is to the victims 30 th birthday. A states approach to SOLs can create uneven access to justice and may contribute to some perpetrators escaping accountability permitting them opportunities to continue to sexually abuse children. PAs criminal and civil SOLs in child sexual abuse cases were not addressed by the Task Force on Child Protection in 2012. QUESTION #12 Do you support changes to Pennsyl vanias criminal and civil statute of limitations in child sexual abuse cases, specificall y would you sign the following legislation as Governor of the Commonwealth:
To eliminate the criminal statute of limitation? ___ Yes ____ No
To eliminate the civil statute of limitation? ___ Yes ____ No
To extend the civil statute of limitations in child sexual abuse cases until the child victim reaches the age of 50? ___ Yes ____ No
To permit a time-limited (e.g., 2 year) retroactive window for filing a civil claim with this option available to child sexual abuse survi vors previousl y barred by existing SOLs? ___ Yes ____ No
4 | G u b e r n a t o r i a l Q u e s t i o n n a i r e w w w . C 4 C J . o r g