Orgs. as Open Systems Organizations are goal-oriented entity of differentiated components (Session 1) Designed as deliberately structured and coordinated activity systems (Sessions 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16) Components interact within a structure and are interdependent Issues of structure, power, culture System takes inputs from the environments and gives outputs to it (Session 2, 13, 14, 15) Linked to external environment and interacts with it Feedback from output to change or correct its operation Structure is separated from its environment by a boundary (Session 2, 13, 14, 15) System grows, differentiates, matures and dies (Session 12) Session 3 2 Session 3 Elements of Structure 3 Elements of Org Structure Formal Reporting Relationships Formal roles (formalization) Number of levels (hierarchy of authority) Span of control Centralization Grouping of Individuals Creation of departments (specialization) Design of Coordinating Systems Communication, coordination and integration of efforts Session 3 4 Session 3 Differentiation 5 Integration: Process of coordinating various tasks, functions, and divisions so that they work together and not at cross-purposes Session 3 Integration 6 Integrating Mechanisms Horizontal linkage coordinates activities across organizational departments Information Systems Liaison Roles Task Forces Full-Time Integrator Teams Session 3 7 Session 3 Integrating Mechanisms 8 Types of Structures Session 3 9 Functional Structure Activities grouped by common function All specific skills and knowledge are consolidated Promotes economies of scale Slow response to environmental changes Prevalent approach but few companies can respond in todays environment without horizontal linkages Session 3 10 Session 3 11 Functional Structure Session 3 12 Divisional Structure Session 3 Product structure or strategic business units Divisions organized according to products, services, product groups Good for achieving coordination across functional departments Suited for fast change Loses economies of scale Lacks technical specialization 13 Divisional Structure Session 3 14 Integrative Mechanisms for Divisional Structure Centralize few key activities that cut across the divisions (e.g., data processing) Rotate managers between divisions Develop cross-functional, cross-divisional team Breaking down larger divisions into smaller divisions Session 3 15 Matrix Structure Session 3 16 Conditions for Matrix Structure Need for shared and flexible use of people across products Two or more critical outputs like new products and technical knowledge The environment is complex and uncertain Session 3 17 Matrix: Strengths & Weaknesses Session 3 18 Horizontal Structure Session 3 19 Horizontal: Strengths & Weaknesses Session 3 20 Virtual Network Example Session 3 21 Virtual Network Strengths and Weaknesses Session 3 22 Hybrid Structure Session 3 23 Application of Structural Design Each structure meets different needs and is a tool that can help managers be more effective Structural alignment aligns structure with organizational goals Symptoms of Structural Deficiency: Decision making is delayed or lacking quality Organization cannot meet changing needs Employee performance declines, needs are not meet Too much conflict Session 3 24 Structure to Organizations Need Efficiency vs. Learning Session 3 25 Comparison of Structures Functional Divisional Matrix Network Division of Labor By inputs By outputs By inputs and outputs By knowledge Coordination Hierarchical supervision, plans & procedures Division General Manager & Corporate Staff Dual reporting relationships Cross-functional teams Decision rights Highly centralized Separation of strategy and execution Shared Highly decentralized Boundaries Core/Periphery Internal & external markets Multiple interfaces Porous and changing Imp. of Informal Structures Low Modest Considerable High Politics Inter-functional Corporate-Division & Inter-divisional Along matrix and resources Shifting coalitions Basis of Authority Positional & functional expertise General management responsibility & resources Negotiating and resources Mutually agreed Session 3 26 Does Structure Influence Performance? Yes Structures influence behaviors Behaviors influence performance Structures should not be static Continuously design and redesign according to the need of the environment Structures should be established keeping in mind the different set of contingencies and different constituents whom it may impact With what frequency should structural changes be made? Better to be incremental than radical It takes time to grow managerial talent Session 3 27 Thank you Session 3 28