that they will no longer require that all quality manual changes be submitted for review and approval prior to implementation. API Spec Q1 states in Annex A, Section A.3.4 Any proposed change to the Licensees quality program, to a degree requiring changes to the quality manual, shall be submitted to API for acceptance prior to incorporation into the Licensees quality program. Can it be interpreted to exclude any changes? Yes. The intent of the changes referenced in the cited clause was to identify significant changes to the quality management system that would have a direct impact on the product or service provided. Minor (editorial/grammatical) quality manual changes or those with no direct impact on the product or service would not require submission of the quality manual prior to incorporation into the Licensees quality program. Q1 8th 4.1 In theAPI Specification Q1 - 8th Edition,Introduction section displays Figure 1 - Model of process-based quality management system. It is very definitive in indicating that "Management Responsibility", "Resource Management", "Product Realization", and "Measurement, Analysis and Improvement" are all processes. Are the sub clauses under the processes of"Management Responsibility", "Resource Management", "Product Realization", and "Measurement, Analysis and Improvement" considered processes? Yes. API Spec Q1, 8 th Edition, Clause 0.2, states that for an organization to function effectively, it has to identify and manage linked activities. An activity using resources, and managed in order to enable the transformation of input into outputs, can be considered as a process. API Spec Q1, 8 th Edition, Clause 0.1, states that the management principles of ISO 9000 and ISO 9004 were considerations in the development of the document. ISO 9004:2000 states that the model shown in Figure 1 does not show processes at a detailed level. (Ref. ISO 9001 and ISO 9004 are consistent pair documents and therefore applicable to the identical [boxed] text between ISO 9001:2000 and API Spec Q1, 8 th Edition). Q1 8th 4.1 In instances where the ISO sections of API Spec Q1 require procedures, yet the supplemental requirements of API Spec Q1 do not specifically require control features or procedures, do the ISO procedure requirements apply to the supplemental requirements? In other words, must the supplemental requirements be addressed within procedures when the main clause of the section (i.e. 8.3) requires a procedure, even though the supplemental requirements do not (i.e. 8.3.3)? Yes. API Spec Q1, 8 th Edition, Clause 8.3, states that The controls and related responsibilities and authorities for dealing with nonconforming product shall be defined in a document procedure. Since API Spec Q1, 8 th Edition, Clause 8.3.3 Customer Notification Supplemental falls within the Control of Nonconforming Product process (Clause 8.3), by extension all supplemental clauses within this process (i.e., 8.3.1, 8.3.2 and 8.3.3) are subject to the requirement for the existence of controls in a documented procedure. Q1 8th 4.2.3 An SOP states that, e.g.: Documents are updated when the relevant changes are required / warranted, e.g. additional details of a described process must be added. Documents are reissued upon implementation of six changes, or when the described by the document process has significantly changed. Naturally, in all the above cases, the documents are re-approved. Is there a necessity to define additionally the frequency of a document (e.g. SOP) change? No. API Spec Q1, 8 th Edition, Clause 4.2.3(b) requires that A documented procedure shall be established to define the controls needed to review and update as necessary and re-approve documents. The term As Necessary in the stated clause provides the flexibility for the user of the document to define when review, update and re-approval are required for the specific situation(s) warranting this action in the quality management system.