(b) Discuss whether the Singapore government should change its policies for managing the balance of payments (N/2008/6).
The Balance of Payments (BOP) for a country is a summary statement of the money value of all economic transactions between the resident of the country with the rest of the world during a specific period of time, usually a year. Singapores BOP position is usually in a surplus due to both its current and financial account being in a surplus. This is due to Singapores export dependent economy and high volume of inward foreign direct investment (FDI). However, due to the 2008 Asian Financial Crisis, Singapores BOP has suffered slightly. This is because during an economic downturn, many countries would import less foreign goods in order to cut costs and there will be a greater withdrawal of FDI out of Singapore due to the poor economic outlook. Hence, the Singapore government needs to adapt some of their policies so as to manage its BOP while coping with the economic downturn.
One of the policies that the Singapore government may need to adapt would be the exchange rate policy. The default stance taken by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) during normal times would be a gradual modest appreciation. The rationale behind this stance is an appreciation of the Singapore dollar would cause the relative price of imports to become cheaper such that the price of imported raw materials will decrease. Given the lowered cost of raw materials, the cost of production for Singapores exports will decrease, so that the price of exported goods will also become cheaper, enhancing the price competitiveness of Singapores exports, increasing demand for Singapores exports. Furthermore, given that with appreciation, the relative price of exports will become more expensive, the increase in demand will bring in more revenue for Singapore. However, in lieu of the 2008 Asian Financial Crisis, MAS should switch its stance to a zero appreciation or slight depreciation so as to not cause a BOP deficit. This is because during an economic downturn, foreign importers of Singapores goods will experience a fall in income, which in turn will lower their purchasing power. Hence, it will cause the demand for Singapores exports will fall. Thus, depreciation will help Singapores economy. A depreciation of Singapores currency will cause the price of its imports to be relatively more expensive and the price of its exports to be relatively cheaper. The demand for Singapores exports tend to be relatively more price elastic during an economic downturn as the goods produced by Singapores exports, such as hard disks and computer parts, tend to have many substitutes in the market. Hence, as Singapores goods become relatively cheaper, the demand for Singapore goods will increase, as foreign importers will turn to Singapore as a cheaper alternative as they are more conscious of cost cutting. As a result, quantity demanded will increase more than proportionate, resulting in an increase in export revenue. Hence, a depreciation of Singapores currency is necessary during this economic downturn.
Whether the MAS should adopt a zero appreciation or slight depreciation stance depends on the state of the economy during the period of time. The MAS might begin by taking a zero appreciation stance, and adjust its policy according afterwards, as an immediate depreciation may lead to import-price push inflation. Furthermore, the implementation of this policy might cause Singapores current account to worsen in the short run, as Marshall Lerners condition may not be satisfied, as the price elasticity of Singapores exports may be inelastic as many importers may be held to their previous import contracts and cannot easily switch to other alternatives. However, in the long run, Marshall Lerners condition should be satisfied as over time importers will be freed from their contracts and hence Singapores exports will be more price elastic. This can be illustrated through the J-Curve effect, where the Balance of Trade of a country would experience a deficit first before experiencing a surplus immediately after depreciation. Hence, if the economic crisis is only lasts for a short period of time, the adoption of this policy may be rendered ineffective.
However, it is not necessary for Singapore to adapt all of its policies to manage BOP during the economic downturn. Singapore does not solely rely on exchange rate policy to manage BOP as it also adopts several supply-side policies to facilitate the management of its BOP. During the economic crisis, it is even more imperative for the Singapore government to continue to put to action its supply side policies to ensure that the BOP is in a surplus.
A supply side policy that should be retained is the governments investment in research and development to improve the non-price factors of Singapores exports. Research and development can help to improve the quality of the goods it produces, or even come up with new and innovative products that can capture the foreign market, thus improving Singapores export competitiveness. Additionally, Singapore can invest in skills development and training of workers through its Workforce Development Agency, which can help improve the price factors of Singapores exports. This is because retraining workers will help improve the efficiency and productivity of Singapores economy. With this increase in efficiency and productivity, the cost of production of Singapores goods will also decrease the prices of Singapores exports and hence improve the price competitiveness of Singapores goods. However, the effectiveness of adopting this policy depends on the mindset of the workers that are sent for retraining. If many of these workers do not embrace the training and upgrading of new or existing skills, the governments investment in retraining will be rendered useless. However, ideally, these two policies will improve both the price and non-price factors that affect Singapores exports, thus improving Singapores current account.
Supply side policies can also improve Singapores BOP surplus through its financial account. This is because, the policies adopted previously that improve the efficiency and productiveness of Singapores economy will attract inward FDI into Singapore, as the efficiency of Singapores economy provides a favourable and attractive environment for FDI to set up its companies in Singapore. This, in addition to other policies such as offering subsidies and decreasing corporate tax will further increase the inflow of FDI in Singapore, thus improving Singapores financial account. Hence, as supply side policies have improved both the financial and current account of Singapores BOP, its deficit will decrease.
In the long run, the adoption of supply side policies by the Singapore government may be more effective in maintaining a BOP surplus in Singapore. This is because the supply side policies will not only tackle and manage Singapores BOP during a time of economic hardship, but it will also improve Singapores productive capacity in the long run, and help Singapore achieve sustained economic growth. Supply side policies will also be effective as they depend on an increase in government spending of the countrys national income, and given that Singapores budget is in surplus, the government will have no problem managing the investments in research and development as well as retraining of workers. Hence, in the long run, Singapore should focus on maintaining its supply side policies to ride out the economic downturn as well as improve Singapores economy in the long run.