Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ph.D. Student
e-mail: anechache@mec.etsmtl.ca
Abdel-Hakim Bouzid
Professor
e-mail: hakim.bouzid@etsmtl.ca
Ecole de Technologie Superieure,
1100 Notre-Dame Ouest,
Montreal, QC, H3C 1K3, Canada
Introduction
Bolted flanged joints are widely used as a means of connection
between pressure equipments such as those found in oil refineries,
chemical, and power plants. A major problem encountered with
this type of connection is its inability to remain tight over a long
period of time. The load relaxation in high temperature applications is the major contributing factor and is due partially to the
creep of the different joint members. Other than an acknowledgement of this effect, the actual ASME Code flange design 1 does
not give a methodological assessment of the load relaxation and
its impact on the actual joint tightness 2. With the new strict
environmental protection regulations and the ever-increasing
safety and hazard requirements, some code design procedures
35 are being revised to include this effect. In addition, however, these code designs incorporate the load loss due to the thermal expansion difference of the joint members that is recognized
to cause a major sealing problem in some high temperature applications 6,7. Other than the mechanical loads, the ASME Code
flange design does not give a specific calculation procedure to
account for the relaxation of the bolt load due to the creep. In
some applications, it was found that creep has induced a loss of
gasket load of more than half of its initial preloading value.
Due to the unavailability of a more complete design procedure,
the designer is often required to make decisions on the basis of
incomplete information and takes a considerable amount of judgment gained from experience and codes of practice. As an aid to
decision making, rational analysis, which attempts to take into
account the most important features of the problem, is an essential
part of the design process.
Although recognized, the long-term creep relaxation in bolted
gasketed joints remains a subject with little research. In the literature, very few papers address analytically the effect of creep to
help engineers estimate accurately the load relaxation in bolted
joints. Creep analyses of bolted flange connections were presented
in Refs. 810. Steady creep was assumed for the flange and
bolts. The stiffening effects of the hub and the cylindrical shell
portion together with gasket creep were ignored. The paper preContributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication
in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received April 22, 2006;
final manuscript received January 4, 2007; published online August 7, 2008. Review
conducted by William Koves. Paper presented at the 2005 ASME Pressure Vessels
and Piping Conference PVP2005, Denver, CO, July 17-21, 2005.
Theoretical Analysis
The current ASME Code flange design rules are based on a
rigid model and do not account for the flexibility of the different
elements of the joint. Figure 1 shows the proposed model used
that is based on a previous work 15,16. The flexibility of the
flange ring, the cylinder, the hub, the gasket, and the bolts and
their mechanical interaction is considered. To this model, strainhardening creep law is applied to the flange ring, the cylinder, and
the hub. The bolt and gasket creep is not considered as this was
the subject of the previous paper 16. The theoretical calculation
procedure that considers this effect is presented in detail here
after.
Multiaxial Creep Model. The BaileyNorton equation representing the uniaxial creep law of the steel materials is given by the
following equation:
c = A c mt n
Downloaded 06 Oct 2008 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Sz = 3 2z r
The above creep model is applied to the flange ring, the cylinder,
and the hub.
Flange Creep Analysis. For large diameter flanges, ring theory
is applied to the flange annular ring section. The ring is subjected
to the tangential and radial stresses caused by the pressure and the
rotation of the flange. It should be noted that the axial and shear
stresses are neglected.
z = r = rz = z = 0
du f 1
= r + rc
dr E
uf 1
= r + c
r E
z =
r + + zc
E
r =
E
1 2
E
=
1 2
uf
du f
rc + c
+
r
dr
10
du f
uf
c + rc
+
dr
r
A/2
M=
t f /2
B/2
t f /2
zdzdr
e =
r + z + z r
2
2 1/2
ce =
rc c 2 + c zc2 + zc rc21/2
B/2
t f /2
t f /2
E
1 2
du f
uf
rc + c
+
dr
r
E f t3f lnA/B
E
121 2
1 2
A/2
B/2
t f /2
t f /2
c + rczdzdr
3
m/n1 c n1/n
rc = 2 SrA1/n
e
c ne
3
m/n1 c n1/n
zc = rc + c = 2 SzA1/n
e
c ne
13
5
with
1
Sr = 3 2r z
1
S = 3 2 r z
031211-2 / Vol. 130, AUGUST 2008
zdzdr
3
m/n1 c n1/n
c = 2 SA1/n
e
c ne
12
A/2
M=
11
12t
t3f lnA/B
A/2
B/2
t f /2
t f /2
c + rczdzdr
14
Downloaded 06 Oct 2008 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
w fc =
CG
f
2
15
r
r + rc = u fe + rc
E
Et3c d2uc
= M z M + Ec
12 dz2
M = M z E
zexdx +
tc/2
1
=
E
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
1
uc
xdx =
R
E
tc/2
xdx +
tc/2
tc/2
xdx
E
t /2
c
tc/2
21
tc/2
N E
pR
+
Eze =
tc tc
2tc
and
uc N
pR E
=
+
R
2tc tc
tc
Equation 23 gives
N =
pR
Euc
E
tc +
2
R
tc/2
tc/2
zcdx
22
12
t4c
d2zc
2 xdx
dz
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
d2zc
xdx +
dz2
d2c
xdx
dz2
tc/2
tc/2
d2c
xdx dx
dz2
31 2
and
R2t2c
Dc =
t3c E
121 2
d 4u c
4
1 p
4 + 4 uc =
dz
Dc
2
uc =
29
2 pR2
e z
+ 3 P1 cos z + M 1cos z sin z
2Etc
2 Dc
30
4 + 4 uc =
dz
Rt3c
c dx
23
12
t3c
12
t4c
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
c dx
d2 zc
xdx +
dz2
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
d2 zc
xdx +
dz2
d2 c
xdx
dz2
tc/2
tc/2
d2 c
xdx dx
dz2
31
tc/2
tc/2
c dx
24
t3c
tc/2
tc/2
12
tc/2
c dx
At time t = 0, the creep effect does not start, and the creep strain
terms vanish so that Eq. 28 becomes the differential equation of
a shell subjected to pressure p and edge loads P1 and M 1:
tc/2
tc/2
c xdx
zcxdx
tc/2
zxdx +
27
tc/2
tc/2
c xdx
where
d 2u c
x 2 xdx
dz
zxdx
E
t /2
c
tc/2
28
20
uc 1
= z + c
R E
26
tc/2
1
121 2
d 4u c
4
1 p+
4 + 4 uc =
dz
Dc
2
Rt3c
19
zcxdx
tc/2
18
d 2u 1
z = ze x 2 = z + zc
dz
E
tc/2
and
16
r
du f
= r c + r
dt
E
tc/2
1
c dx +
t
c
t /2
c
tc/2
zcdx
d2uc
dz2
=
z=0
25
tc/2
12
M
1
Dc t3c
12
t4c
tc/2
zcxdx +
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
zcxdx +
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
c xdx
z=0
c xdx dx
z=0
Downloaded 06 Oct 2008 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
d3uc
dz3
tc/2
P1 12
=
Dc t3c
z=0
tc/2
tc/2
tc/2
12
t4c
tc/2
tc/2
d zc
tc/2
d c
tc/2
d zc
xdx +
dz
dz
dz
tc/2
tc/2
d c
xdx
dz
121 2
d2 3 d2uh
4
z
+
zu
=
h
dz2
dz2
a h 3
xdx
32
xdx dx
Equation 31 has no known analytical solution and is solved using finite difference method. However, it is necessary to know the
stresses to be able to calculate the strain rates.
Due to the redistribution of load as a result of creep of the shell
material, the stress after each time increment is
z = ze +
= e +
t
z
33
pR
Ex d uc
2tc 1 2 dz2
34
Ex d uc
pR Euc
+
tc
R
1 2 dz2
Ex d2uc
E
c + c
z =
2
2
1 dz
1 2 z
+
E
1 2 tc
tc/2
tc/2
c dx +
1
tc
tc/2
zcdx
tc/2
Euc Ex d2uc
E
c + zc
2
2
R 1 dz
1 2
+
2
E
1 2 tc
tc/2
tc/2
c dx +
tc
tc/2
zcdx
tc/2
121 2
d 2 2 d 2u h
4
z
+
zu
=
p 1
h
2
2
3
dz
dz
E h
2
where
121 2
2a2b
12
M
1,2
Dh
3z 3
z/2
12
4z 4
z/2
z/2
d2 c
xdx
dz2
zcxdx
c xdx dx
38
zcxdx +
z/2
z/2
z/2
z/2
z/2
12
4z 4
z/2
z/2
d c
xdx dx
dz
c xdx dx
z=z1=z2
39
z=z1,z2
z/2
z=z1,z2
z/2
z/2
z/2
c xdx
z/2
z/2
z/2
zcxdx +
z/2
z/2
d zc
xdx +
dz
d zc
dz
z/2
d c
xdx
dz
z/2
z=z1,z2
xdx
z=z1,z2
36
z = ze +
= e +
40
where
1/4
ze =
pah
Ex d2uh
2z 1 2 dz2
41
Ex d2uh
pah Euh
e =
+
z
ah 1 2 dz2
z/2
z/2
12
P1,2
Dh
3z 3
z/2
z/2
z=z1,z2
d 3 d2uh
z
dz
dz2
35
z/2
and
d2 zc
xdx +
dz2
z/2
e =
z/2
12 d2 1
4 dz2 z
d2uh
dz2
c dx
z/2
where
ze =
z/2
z/2
z/2
12
3
z=0
and
z =
d2uh
E
Eh
+
2 x
1 dz2 1 2 z
1
z
z/2
z/2
zcdx
z/2
z/2
c dx
E
c + c
1 2 z
Transactions of the ASME
Downloaded 06 Oct 2008 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Ex d2uh
Euh
E
c + zc
R
1 2 dz2 1 2
2
E
1 2 z
z/2
z/2
c dx +
z/2
zcdx
z/2
f =
42
Compatibility and Elastic Interaction. The radial displacement and the rotation due to the creep, calculated at the flange to
hub and hub to cylinder junctions, are added to those given by the
elastic effect. The total radial displacement and rotation are introduced on the flexibility model to determine the redistribution of
the edge loads at each junction of the hub and the cylinder. Finally, the new bolt load and subsequently the new gasket contact
stress are evaluated after each time interval.
Radial Displacements, Rotations, and Edge Loads. The radial displacement, the rotation, and the edge loads of the individual bolted joint components of Fig. 1 needs to be considered in
the flexibility analysis in order to determine the bolt load relaxation. It is to be noted that the creep terms are added for the total
displacements and rotations.
The radial displacement and the rotation of the cylindrical shell
at the hub junction are
1
1
2 R
P1 + 2 M 1 +
p + ucc
3
2 Dc
2 Dc
2Ectc
2
uc =
c =
1
1
P1
M 1 + cc
2
2 Dc
Dc
43
44
pa2h
2 h + uch
2Ehz
45
Mh =
2 hpa2h
+ ch
2Ehz2
Eh3z1/2
481 2h
+
Ph =
46
2 hpa2h2
47
121 2h
Eh32z1/2
241 2h
B
P2
P
2E
tf
K2 + 1
tf
+ + f + ucf
2
2
K 1
49
M f + cf
50
6B
Et3f lnA/B
C G
G B 2
B
Bt f
M2
P2 +
Fb +
G + B2p
Do
2Do
2Do
16Do
51
w =w =w
i
e
p
e
52
c
e
53
with
we =
Fe
Ke
Fib Fig
C G i Fcb Fcg
CG
+
+2
f =
+
+2
Kb Kg
2
Kb Kg
2
cf +
c
f
54
where Kb is the bolt stiffness and Kg is the gasket stiffness that
depends on the level of stress reached during bolt-up and is obtained by linear interpolation of unloading curves as described in
Ref. 20. Finally, at each interval of time, a system of 13 equations is formed to solve for the 13 unknowns, namely, C1, C2, C3,
C4, P1, M 1, P2, M 2, uc, c, uh, f , and Fb 15.
Downloaded 06 Oct 2008 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Fig. 2 3D FE model
this study, is the application of creep and the relaxation of the bolt
load over time is evaluated. It is to be noted that for the case of the
120 in heat exchanger flange creep was considered with no pressure applied. To quantify the effect of creep and the contribution
of each element of the bolted joint, the shell, the hub, and the
flange ring were subjected to creep individually and simultaneously together. To emphasize the importance of the creep be-
NPS 3 slip-on
36 in.
HE
52 in.
HE
120 in.
HE
3.138
7.5
0.216
0.216
1
0.8775
6
4.5
0.625
4
35
48.525
1.5625
1.8125
2.491
6.625
44.562
36.75
2
28
51
58.375
0.625
0.823
1.25
5.625
56.25
52.625
1
76
120.25
127
0.625
1.125
3.125
2.9375
124.5
122.5
1
84
T F
Flanges
Material
Ac
36 in. HE
52 in. HE
NPS 3 cl 150
slip-on
120 in HE
SS316
SS316
Forged
steel
Forged
steel
1.04 1026
1.04 1026
9.36 1029
5.35
5.35
5.5
0.22
0.22
1
1292
1292
9.36 1029
5.5
Downloaded 06 Oct 2008 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Downloaded 06 Oct 2008 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
5.88
7.40
47.20
29.80
51.60
38.03
3.70
2.96
5.70
5.08
9.20
10.10
14.80
14.40
3.69
2.43
5.66
4.84
11.70
12.80
20.54
22.03
4.46
3.33
8.15
7.62
23.20
18.98
27.80
29.70
of load drop is obtained when only the hub creeps. This represents
2633% of the relaxed load. Therefore, the total contribution to
load relaxation when considering the shell and hub to creep represents about 3060% of the total combined creep.
In addition, Figs. 10 and 11 show the average axial gasket stress
variation over time caused by the creep effect of the different
elements that compose the flange. Those elements are made to
creep individually or attached to the structure and combined to-
Conclusion
A study on the importance of including the shell and hub in the
creep analysis of bolted joints has been conducted. An analytical
model was developed to evaluate the bolt load relaxation over
time. It was found that the shell and hub contribute to up to 60%
of the total relaxed load for the examples presented in this paper.
Creep of these elements including the flange ring has been
coupled to the axial deflection compatibility equations to determine the resulting gasket and bolt load relaxations. The proposed
analytical approach based on the flexibility of the joint components has potential for possible incorporation in flange designs
once simplified.
The developed analytical models were compared to the more
accurate 3D FEA on three different size flanges. The results of the
flange ring, the bolt, and gasket stresses and their relaxation over
time compare reasonably well to those of FEA.
Nomenclature
Fig. 10 Gasket stress relaxation
t
f
Ac, m, n
ah
A
B
C
C1 C12
D
Do
E
Kb
Ke
Kg
Fb
Downloaded 06 Oct 2008 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Fe
Fg
G
M
Mf
M1
M2
N
P1
P2
p
R
r
S
S1 S12
T
tf
tc
th
u
u
w
w
x
Superscript
c refers to creep
f refers to final state
i refers to initial state
Subscript
1
2
b
c
e
f
g
r
refers
refers
refers
refers
refers
refers
refers
refers
refers
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
References
1 ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 2001, Section VIII, Division 2, Appendix 2, Rules for Bolted Flange Connections with Ring Type Gaskets.
2 Payne, J. R, 1985, PVRC Flanged Joint Users Survey, Weld. Res. Counc.
Bull., 306, pp. 139.
3 EN 1591-1:2001 E, Flanges and their jointsDesign rules for gasketed circular flange connections Part 1: Calculation method.
4 EN 1591-2:2001 E, Flanges and their jointsDesign rules for gasketed circular flange connections Part 2: Gasket parameters.
5 EN 13555 2001, Flanges and their jointsGasket parameters and test procedures relevant to the design rules for gasketed circular flange connections.
6 Nechache, A., and Bouzid, A., 2002, The Redistribution of Load in Bolted
Gasketed Joints Subjected to Steady State Thermal Loading, Proceedings of
the Tenth International Conference on Nuclear Engineering-ICONE 10, Arlington, VA, ICONE10-22194, pp. 19.
7 Nechache, A., and Bouzid, A., 2003, The Determination of the Load Changes
in Bolted Gasketed Joints Subjected to Elevated Temperatures, Proceedings
of the 2003 ASME-PVP Conference, PVP-Vol.457, Analysis of Bolted Joints,
Cleveland, OH, Paper No. PVP2003-1883, pp. 139148.
8 Bailey, R. W, 1933, Flanged Pipe Joints for High Pressure and Temperatures, Engineering, 1453771, pp. 674676.
9 Marin, J., 1938, Stresses and Deformations in Pipe Flanges subjected to
Creep at High Temperature, J. Franklin Inst., 226, pp. 645657.
10 Waters, E. O, 1938, Analysis of Bolted Joints at High Temperatures, Trans.
ASME, 60, pp. 8386.
11 Kraus, H., and Rosenkrans, W., 1984, Creep of Bolted Flanged Connections,
Weld. Res. Counc. Bull., 294, pp. 28.
12 Bouzid, A., Chaaban, A., and Bazergui, A., 1995, The Effect of Creep Relaxation on the Leakage Tightness of Bolted Flanged Joints, ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 117, pp. 7178.
13 Bouzid, A., and Chaaban, A., 1997, An accurate Method for Evaluating Relaxation in Bolted Flanged Connections, ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.,
119, pp. 1017.
14 Bouzid, A., and Nechache, A., 2004, Creep Modeling of Bolted Flange
Joints, Proceedings of the 2004 ASME-PVP Conference, PVP-Vol.478, San
Diego, CA, Paper No. PVP2004-2621, pp. 4956.
15 Bouzid, A., and Nechache, A., 2005, Thermally Induced Deflections in
Bolted Flanged Connections, ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 127, pp.
394401.
16 Bouzid, A., and Nechache, A., 2005, An Analytical Solution for Evaluating
Gasket Stress Change in Bolted Flange Connections Subjected to High Temperature Loading, ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 127, pp. 414427.
17 Kraus, H., 1980, Creep Analysis, Wiley, New York.
18 Burgreen, D., 1979, Pressure Vessel Analysis, C.P., Jamaica, NY.
19 Timoshenko, S. P., 1930, Theory of Plate and Shells, Wiley, New York.
20 Bouzid, A., and Champliaud, H., 2004, Contact Stress Evaluation of NonLinear Gaskets Using Dual Kriging Interpolation, ASME J. Pressure Vessel
Technol., 126, pp. 445450.
21 Betten, J., 2002, Creep Mechanics, Springer, Berlin.
22 ANSYS, 2004, ANSYS, VERSION 8.1
Downloaded 06 Oct 2008 to 129.5.16.227. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm