Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aysel T. Atimtay
Lee D. Gasper-Galvin
James A. Poston
Morgantown Energy Technology Center
Morgantown, WV 26505
Keywords : D e s u l f u r i z a t i o n , supported Sorbents, Hot Gas Cleanup
INTRODUCTION
other metal oxides. Various combination of metal oxides, such a s Zn, Cu, A l , T i ,
Fe, Co, Mo, and V were t r i e d a t Massachusetts I n s t i t u t e of Technology (MIT) and
and high
J e t Propulsion Laboratory ( J P L ) i n an e f f o r t t o develop a durable
capacity sorbent f o r removal of H,S from hot coal-derived gases ( 8 ) . Basically,
t h e sorbents t e s t e d were divided i n t o two groups: 1. Zinc-based sorbents, 2.
Copper-based sorbents.
Zinc-based sorbents included zinc f e r r i t e (ZF), zincCopper-based sorbents included
copper f e r r i t e ( Z C F ) , and zinc t i t a n a t e ( Z T ) .
Research r e s u l t s (8)
copper aluminate (CA) and copper-iron aluminate (CFA)
showed t h a t zinc-based sorbents were more promising than copper-based sorbents i n
t h e temperature range of 1000" 1350" F (538" 732C). One of t h e most promising
sorbents among t h e zinc-based sorbents was zinc t i t a n a t e (maximum operating
temperature of 1340'F (727C)). I t was found t h a t t h e TiO, phase helps t o s t a b i l i z e
t h e ZnO phase, and v o l a t i l i z a t i o n of Zn a t temperatures higher than 1290F (699C)
However,
has been reduced (about 1 w t % Zn i s l o s t i n 1000 hours of o p e r a t i o n ) .
TiO, does not absorb 4 s e f f e c t i v e l y . Therefore, t h e capacity of zinc t i t a n a t e is
lower than t h a t of zinc f e r r i t e due t o d i l u t i o n e f f e c t .
'
prepared with t h i s process (SPlCSM5, SP2C5M5, and SP2C9M1). The atomic absorption
spectrophotometer a n a l y s i s showed t h a t Cu and Mn loadings on t h e sorbent SPlC5M5
were 1.82 % and 1.64 % by weight, respectively. SP2C5M5 had 4.39 % by w t . Cu and
The corresponding values f o r SP2C9M1 were 5.15 % and 5.73 % by
6.11 % by w t . Mn.
weight, r e s p e c t i v e l y . The uncertainty i n t h e atomic absorption a n a l y s i s i s +1%.
Experimental
A schematic diagram of t h e experimental system i s shown i n Figure 1.
The
system consisted of a gas mixing system, a fixed bed reactor, a condenser and a
water knock-out p o t , a gas sampling system, and a t a i l - g a s cleanup System. Gases
were supplied from gas cylinders and t h e flow rates were monitored through mass
flow c o n t r o l l e r s . After t h e gases were mixed i n a manifold, they were fed i n t o
t h e fixed bed r e a c t o r . This gas mixture simulated the p a r t i a l l y quenched e x i t gas
of an air-blown KRW f l u i d i z e d bed c o a l g a s i f i e r which had t h e following molar
composition:
42.5 % N:, 11 % CO,, 1 2 . 5 % CO, 1 3 . 8 % H,, 1 % CH,, and 0.2 % H,S.
19 % &O i n t h e gas mixture was provided by adding a predetermined amount of water
i n t o the gas stream before it entered t h e reactor v i a a high pressure pump.
sorbent has g r e a t e r capacity a t 1250F (677C) and 1600F (871'C) than a t 1000F
(538C). However, t h e prebreakthrough H,S l e v e l s are lower a t 1000F (538C) and
1250F (677C) than a t 1600F (871C). Although t h e prebreakthrough H,S l e v e l i s
lower a t 1000F (538"C), t h e sorbent has more t o t a l capacity at t h e higher
temperatures.
Two runs were conducted a t 1250F (677C) with d i f f e r e n t samples from t h e same
batch of SPlC5M5 sorbent, t o e s t a b l i s h t h e extent of r e p r o d u c i b i l i t y of t h e
experimental method. Twelve d e t e c t o r tube readings of $S were taken, 5 min apart,
f o r each run.
The average difference between readings f o r t h e two runs was 30
ppmv. Thus, t h e experimental method appears t o be reasonably reproducible.
Two and one-half cycles
Sorbent regenerability was t e s t e d at 1250F (677'C).
were conducted with only a i r as t h e regenerant gas, and f i v e cycles were studied
Two c r i t e r i o n
using a 50 mole % steam/50 mole % a i r mixture f o r regeneration.
(1) a comparison of t h e
were used t o assess t h e r e g e n e r a b i l i t y of t h e sorbent:
H,S breakthrough curves, and ( 2 ) a comparison of t h e SO, o u t l e t curves during t h e
sulfidations.
When t h e sorbent was regenerated with a i r , t h e second and t h i r d s u l f i d a t i o n
breakthrough curves were somewhat s i m i l a r .
However, t h e prebreakthrough average
H,S o u t l e t concentration was approximately 50 ppmv less f o r t h e t h i r d s u l f i d a t i o n
than for t h e second s u l f i d a t i o n . Figure 3 shows t h e H,S breakthrough curves a f t e r
t h e sorbent was regenerated with steam/air. The curve f o r t h e f i r s t s u l f i d a t i o n
was not shown, a s t h e r e a c t o r bypass was a c c i d e n t a l l y l e f t open during t h e run.
The t h i r d through s i x t h s u l f i d a t i o n s , conducted with steam/air regeneration, gave
Thus, t h e steam/air regeneration appears t o give
s i m i l a r breakthrough curves.
b e t t e r regenerability than a i r regeneration.
Outlet SO, concentrations were compared f o r t h e second and t h i r d s u l f i d a t i o n s
+ CO,
$S t CO
H,S
COS t H,O
_ _ j COS t H,
At
107
2. P. R.
11, pp.
4.
5.
P. V. Ranade and D. P. Harrison, " The Variable Property Grain Model Applied to
the Zinc Oxi'de-Hydrogen Sulfide Reaction," Chem.Eng.Sci., 3, pp. 1079, 1981.
6. T. Grindley and G. Steinfeld, " Development and Testing of Regenerable Hot CoalGas Desulfurization Sorbent," Report DOE/METC/16545-1125, 1981.
7. G. D. Focht, et al., " Structural Property Changes in Metal Oxide Hot Coal Gas
Desulfurization Sorbents," Report DOE/MC/21166-2163 ( DOE 86016041 ) , 1986.
8. M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, et al., "Detailed Studies of Novel Regenerable
Sorbents for High-Temperature Coal-Gas Desulfurization," Proceedings of the
Seventh Annual Gasification and Gas Stream Cleanup Systems Contractors Review
Meeting, DOE/METC-87/6079, Vol. 2, pp. 726, 1987.
11. L.
12. Chenistry of Rot Gas Cleafiup i n Coal Gasification and Combusr;ion, Morgantown
Energy Research Center, MERC/SP-78/2, 1978.
co +co*
H2
Distilled
Water
,Container
Fig. 1
110
Tail
111