Professional Documents
Culture Documents
had it that this drive for conspiracy is almost a natural motive amongst suppliers.
" People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and
diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in
some contrivance to raise prices." - Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations (1776 "
The self-serving profit motive is in most cases the force behind this disruptive
behavior by sellers. Instead of being a rational and efficient engine for economic
growth supplier-driven markets, left to the own, are imperfect and chaotic, affecting
product quality by offering shoddy goods and services; undermining consumer
welfare and economic growth. The suppliers of services in the communications
sector are no exception and complaints abound with regard to various ‘clever’
methods used to enhance a suppliers’ market power.
4. Given these market imperfections, or rather what is termed as 'market failure',
authoritative intervention is required to provide the necessary oversight, or
superintendence, that would keep markets as far as possible within the confines of
'fair' competition. Most market economies have in place some kind institutional
setup to oversee competition.
"There is no reason to assume that this is true only of large, developed
economies. Price-fixing between competitors will always be attractive to firms
that wish to maximize their own profits at the expense of their customers, and
there is little reason to assume that they will voluntarily refrain from doing so,
unless they are constrained by competition law. Similarly, local monopolies will
have no incentive to improve their performance and will have every incentive to
deter the entry of new rivals into the market. Competition law may be able to
expose such monopolies to competitive forces."
The recent economic liberalization world trend has generated a worldwide movement
led by multilateral institutions ( UN, UNCTAD, OECD, etc) to introduce systemic
competition oversight worldwide. Emerging markets, those of the third world and
former soviet block, have been a fertile ground for growth and experimentation. In
Tanzania some kind of competition oversight was made through the Price Regulation
mechanisms inherited from the colonial state2. When the statute was repealed a task
force was set up whose recommendations resulted into the introduction of a statutory
organs to oversee competition in 1994. The background to that process is detailed
elsewhere and the challenges arising thereby enumerated (See Mkocha, UNCTAD,
2003). Competition authorities were set up for the first time to oversee the market
roles of the three players; Government, Suppliers and Consumers; more robust
legislative schemes coming in from 2001. Legislation on ‘fair competition’ has, on
the one hand, established a Fair Competition Commission (FCC), a Fair Competition
Tribunal (FCT) and a National Consumer Advocacy Council (NCAC).3 On the other
hand, regulation of the ‘natural monopolies’ has been established in transport
2
See Nditi, Nicholas N.N, Consumer Protection Law and Practice: Its Relevance and Reality in a Developing Economy with
Special Reference to Tanzania. [PhD Thesis, 1987, University of Dar Es Salaam].
3
The Fair Competition Act, 2003
Page 3 of 21
In America regulatory intervention started from the end of the 18 th century with the
emergency of Anti-Trust Laws that regulated cartels and monopolies. But active
consumer protection started in the early 1960s from the so-called Kennedy
Principles, which outlined the rights of consumer that required protection. Later on a
World wide movement of Consumer Associations took root and today the Consumer
International is the key player in Consumer advocacy.
4
The Surface and Marine Transport Authority Act, 2001 [Cap. 413]
5
The Energy & Water Utilities Regulatory Authority, 2001 [Act No. 11 of 2001]
6
The Tanzania Communications Regulatory Authority Act, 2003 [Act No. 12 of 2003]
7
The Tanzania Civil Aviation Authority Act, 2003 [Act No. 10 of 2003]
Page 4 of 21
The competition authority, such as the FCC, and the regulatory authorities, e.g. The
Tanzania Communications Regulatory Authority (TCRA) and, quality control and
licensing legislation, give effect to consumer protection through enforcement of
consumer rights. The expected outcome is to equate and balance consumer power in
the market to that of producers. Consumer power is expected to be a “countervailing
force” to what is perceived as increasing producer power and influence in the
Markets. Three types of compliance frameworks have been in use: The Command
and Control; Self Regulation; and, Co-Regulation.
Professor Nditi in his PhD thesis12 has reviewed these developments and it is obvious
that the framework was not as successful. The cost of enforcement is particularly
high, and changing business conditions, at every moment outpace any “conduct-
specific legislation”. The enforcement units were often passive and generally
affected by graft from money-oiled suppliers. The contractual based Sale of Goods
provisions assumed the consumer would help himself by voluntarily accessing the
courts. Not many consumers had the knowledge or financial wherewithal for
undertaking legal proceedings.
The inadequacy of “Command and Control” framework led in some countries to give
free reign to what has been termed as Self-Regulation. In this framework Suppliers
design codes of practice and charters on the basis of which they make a pledge to the
buyers that they would adhere to what is stated in their Charters. This also has not
been successful. Producers through their Chambers of Commerce and Associations
have been most self-serving and rarely lack the muscle to enforce the Charters
against their deviant members. At law it is unclear what status the charters have in
relation to Consumer rights and enforcement. In Tanzania this phenomenon has
taken root only recently and the Civil Service and some Parastatals, eg. NSSF, have
been at the forefront in producing Consumer Charters. The Media has been widely
used with TV programmes showing how an “empowered consumer” demands
prompt service on the basis of a Charter. Commercial organisations, especially
Banks, have consumer charters that are not well publicised. If you visit the Website
of the Tanzania Bankers Association (TBA), there is a promise there that the banking
industry is working towards a Tanzania Bankers Code of Practice. This has been a
promise that has seen no active action. A study launched in 2007 by FinScope 13 on
the Financial Services Sector in Tanzania tells it all – consumers of Banking services
have still a long way to go despite the existence of rights they have under the
financial institutions legislation with regards to information, services and privacy.
TCRA has its own code of conduct and in its Website a Consumer Charter. The
enforcement of the Codes of the basis of self-regulation clearly begs the question of
whether it is realistic.
basis of which all market players “Self-regulate” themselves. Regulators provide the
medium for setting producer standards and codes with the participation of Producers
and Consumer representatives. Once the standards and codes are agreed upon
producers and their organisations are expected to enforce them. The Regulators have
the power to intervene, but only in cases where producer enforcement is ineffective.
The participatory approach to this kind of compliance framework has the advantage
of allowing all parties to be involved in the design of standards and codes. It allows
self-regulation but has a safety net of regulator intervention 14. Critical to this
framework is consumer participation. And effective Consumer participation is
ineffective where Consumers are not aware of their rights and responsibilities. This
brings to the fore the central issue of consumer education. The case of the Daladala
transporters in Dar Es Salaam who failed to adhere to fare benchmarks settled by
themselves with SUMATRA - the regulator - is instructive. Had consumer
participation been effective the transporters would not have dared to breach the
agreement. The co-regulation model is the basis for the TCRA consumer protection
and compliance framework.
Consumer Education is the sum of processes whereby individuals are equipped with
skills and knowledge which they need to negotiate and function effectively and
responsibly in an increasing complex marketplace.15 This knowledge includes how
the market operates and much more critical, the measures taken for consumers
protection and the consumers’ role in it.
In many countries where consumer movement has been well established, consumer
education is the basis of school curricula and civic education from primary,
secondary schools to Universities.
The public education programmes are developed through media participation and
other mass communication alternatives. It is now accepted that an informed
consumer is critical to well being of an economic system.
14
DTI ‘Comparative Report on Consumer Policy Regimes’ (UK, 2003)
15
Australian Consumers' Association, "Educating Australian Consumers," IOUC Consumer Education Workshop (Oslo, IOUC,
1984)
Page 7 of 21
The movement has been able to articulate what are the essential Consumer Rights and
Obligations through a rights- based analysis.
Consumer Rights.
Right to satisfy basic needs
Right to safety
Right to be Informed
Right to choice
Right to be heard
Right to redress
Right to a healthy environment
Right to Consumer Education
Incipient Rights
Right to boycott
Right to Opportunity
Page 8 of 21
Consumer Responsibilities.
Critical Awareness
Action
Social Concern
Environmental Concern/Sustainable Consumption
Working Together/Collective Action
Consumer Education is a process of gaining knowledge and skills for managing consumer
resources and prepares the consumer to initiate action to influence market decisions. It trains us
on how to cope with existing market relations and structures and how to influence changes for the
future.
Consumer Information on the other hand is the process of providing data relating to a particular
product or range of products to enable one to make a decision for purchasing the product. It
covers as well data on an existing industries and its regulation.
Consumer Information thus focuses on a particular product and services whilst Consumer
Education relates to effective use of such information in the market place. Such consumer rights
as the right to be informed and right to choice, cover aspects of Consumer Information.
C. Consumer Rights/Protections.
Consumer education and advocacy cannot be the mandate of competition authorities themselves.
This mandate is only justified on limited grounds which include the fact that government plays
an important role in the provision of a level playing field, providing correct information to the
Players, setting standards, providing avenues for dispute processing and redress, etc. The larger
advocacy role is that played by the Consumers themselves. Consumer power cannot be fully
unleashed and felt in the market without an organized consumer base. This organized base is
woefully lacking in Tanzania and reports and market reviews have constantly noted this
weakness. Government on its part to remedy this lacunae has set up a mechanism to provide
advisory functions on the basis on which such a consumer base could be cultivated. This is the
rationale for the NCAC and the Consumer Consultative Councils (Triple Cs) of TCRA,
SUMATRA, EWURA and TCAA. Both Competition Superintendence and Consumer Oversight
must reflect, as a starting point, the basis on which consumer education, organization and
oversight may be achieved. The International Consumer movement has come a long way in
developing best practices for consumer advocacy. The starting point is the understanding of
consumer rights and responsibilities.
i. Consumers have the right to basic goods and services which guarantee survival,
including adequate food, clean water supplies, clothing, shelter, health care,
education and sanitation. Access to basic goods and services is critical to people
in developing countries. This consumer right is often overlooked by people in
industrialized nations but it is important for developing countries. [Nathan, 2003]
ii. There is also constitutional support for this Right. Article 14 of the Constitution
of URT 1977 guarantees the Right to Life. Article 11 directs the State to make
provision for the Right to Work, Self Education and Welfare of the Individual
citizen to be realized. Various Statutes in this regard are in place for Education,
Health, provision of utilities, welfare and Economic Empowerment of the
citizenry.
The Occupational Health and Safety Act, 2003 (5 of 2003). An Act that
repealed the Factories Ordinance, Cap.297; makes provisions for the safety,
health and welfare of persons at work in factories and other places of work;
provides for the protection of persons other than persons at work (eg.
Consumers) against hazards to health and safety arising out of or in
connection with activities of persons at work; and provides for other
connected matters.
The Tanzania Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 2003. An Act that
provides for the efficient and comprehensive regulation and control of food,
drugs, medical devices, cosmetics, herbal drugs and poisons and repeals the
Food (Control of Quality) Act, 1978, the Pharmaceuticals and Poisons Act,
and provides for other matters related thereto..
Page 10 of 21
The Weights and Measures Act, Cap. 340 [R.E. 2002]. An Act that revises
and consolidates the law relating to weights and measures and provides for
the introduction of the International System of Units (SI) and related matters.
Repealed and saved the Weights and Measures Ordinance [R.L. Cap. 426];,
the Sale of Goods (Weights and Measures) Ordinance [R.L. Cap.427], the
Weights and Measures (Metric System) Act, No. 46 of 1968; and the Metric
System (Amendment of Written Laws) Act, No. 52 of 1969.]
The Standards Act Cap. 130 - R.E. 2002 [Act. No. 3 of 1975]. An Act that
provides for the promotion of the standardization of specifications of
commodities, establishes the Tanzania Bureau of Standards and provides for
the functions, management and control of the Bureau. The Bureau is
enjoined to establish standards and specify standards that are compulsory
(SS.16 and 17 of the Act].
Appeals from the Authority go the Fair Competition Tribunal (Section 42 TCRA
Act).
9. Incipient Rights
i. The Right to Boycott
The right to resist and boycott any person, goods or services in the event of
conflict with consumer's interest
CUTS of India elaborates that "Boycott can be defined as the social and
commercial intercourse: to refuse to take part in, deal with, handle by way of
trade, etc. It can be defined as the refusal to social and commercial relation
with (a person, group, country, etc.) or refusal to handle or use the goods".
Precedents to this right have happened against products produced by Racist
Page 14 of 21
D. Consumer Responsibilities.
1. Critical Awareness
i. The responsibility to be alert and questioning about the price and quality of the
goods and services we buy and use. To look, listen and ask questions. We need to
shop around, checking the facts of products and services: Are they value for
money, value for people and value for the environment?
2. Action
i. The responsibility to assert ourselves and act to ensure that consumers get a fair
deal. As long as they remain passive consumers they will continue to be
exploited. When something is wrong; one must act to put it right.
3. Social Concern
i. The responsibility to be aware of the impact of the use of consumer goods and
services on other citizens, especially disadvantaged and powerless groups
whether in the local, national, regional or international community. Consumers
need to make sure that the products and services that they use are not produced in
a situation that harms others.
4. Environmental Concern/Sustainable Consumption
i. The responsibility to understand the environmental and other consequences of
our consumption. We should recognize our individual and collective
responsibility to conserve natural resources and protect the earth for future
generations. We need to make sure that the production, use and disposal of goods
and services do not harm the environment.
ii. Sustainable consumption is “the use of goods and services that
responds to basic needs and brings a better quality of life, while
minimising the use of natural resources, toxic materials and
emissions of waste and pollutants over the life cycle, so as not
to jeopardize the needs of future generations.” Consumptions
patterns that are responsive and sensitive to the earth’s
carrying capacity for present and future generations.
Page 15 of 21
1. RIGHTS
a) Access
A consumer has a right to have access to basic communications services at
reasonable prices.
b) Information
A consumer has a right to full pre-contractual information that is clear
(understandable), helpful, adequate and accurate on the services and choices
offered by a service provider/operator to facilitate the making of an informed
choice.
Consumers have a right to receive information assistance to assist them in use of
services.
Consumers have a right to have access to sector governing information.
Consumers have a right to have comparative information.
c) Quality of Service
Consumers have a right to receive a service with a quality that reflects the cost of
the service (Value for money).
Consumers have a right to receive the level of quality of service that is quoted or
stated by the service provider/operator in the service agreement.
d) Fairness
A consumer has a right to fair treatment without undue discrimination from
another consumer.
Consumers have a right to fair terms of service.
e) Complaint
A consumer has a right to complain about quality, delay, quantity and tariff with
regard to the nature of the communication service provided.
16
Adopted from TCRA’s Document entitled ‘Know Your Rights: Rights and Obligations of Consumers in the Communications
Sector’ Available on TCRA’s Website.
Page 16 of 21
f) Redress
A consumer has a fright to an effective system for handling of complaints.
h) Privacy
Every Consumer has a Right to Privacy.
i) Consumer Education
Consumers have a right to be educated on services being offered to them.
k) Representation
Consumers have a right to make representations to those delivering, regulating or
governing the communications services on matters pertaining to the services
offered to them and other consumer preference.
l) Billing Information
Consumers have a right to access billing information.
2. CONSUMER DUTIES:
b) Environmental Protection
Each consumer has a responsibility of ensuring that his/her utilization or
consumption of communication services is not in a manner hazardous to the
environment.
c) Awareness
It is the responsibility of the consumer to be alert and to question issues such as
terms and conditions of service.
Page 17 of 21
d) Action
A consumer has an obligation to be assertive so as to ensure that he/she and other
users of the service(s) receive a fair deal.
into words. A joint consumer council forum presently Chaired by Professor Katima
of EWURA is being prepared to be the basis for joint action for all Consumer
Councils including TCRA-CCC.
B. Institutional Set-Up Challenges
1. The TCRA-CCC must put up its Strategic Plans and build a National Network
whereby it can effectively reach Tanzanians. So far the TCRA-CCC is still a Dar Es
Salaam and major urban-areas phenomenon.
2. The funding options are still questionable as TCRA, like the other Triple Cs, does not
have an independent funding base. Presently great reliance is upon funding from the
Authority. This is seen by all the Councils as a conflicting set-up and may result in
making the Councils the pawns or hostages of the Regulators who hold the cash
strings. In a co-regulation model the regulator has to be institutionally independent
from the market stakeholders i.e. Government, Suppliers and Consumers.
3. There are serious challenges in the Consumer’s Dispute Settlement framework. The
Regulator appears to be a quasi – legislator in the sense of being given rule-making
powers; the Regulator has also quasi judicial powers in that within the complaints
and dispute resolution area he may settle disputes; and finally the Regulator has
Executive powers of issuing licenses and enforcement of compliance. Consumers are
somehow concerned about these extensive powers of the Regulator rife with conflict
of interest situations. Yet they do not have recourse to easily accessible dispute
settlement forums. The small claims courts, popular in UK and other countries,
appear to be an attractive solution. A mobile phone user in Ngara District who has
been abused by a service provider how is she going to get a remedy from a Regulator
centered in Dar Es Salaam? These are challenges that must be resolved within the
whole Consumer Protection framework. The government and all stakeholders must
come out with a comprehensive consumer protection policy that would cover all
these issues.
Page 20 of 21
Health Legal
*Is it labelled?
*Is it dangerous to health ?
*Is there an expiry date ?
How?
*Is it shortweight?
*Does it make me healthier ?
*If it is spoilt, can I return it?
*Is it nutritious?
*Is production according to
*Is it hygienically prepared ?
safety regulations ?
*Has its production caused
*Is it being dumped in other
ill health to workers?
countries ?
*Does it undermine the
*Does the company respect
health system ?
workers ?
Legal
*Is it labelled?
Environment *Is there an expiry date?
*Does it cause pollution? *Is it shortweight ?
PRODUCT
*Does it cause a little
problem?
*If it is spoilt , can I return it?
*How do I dispose of it? *Is production according to
*Bio-degradeable wrappers? safety regulations?
*De-forestation? *Is it being dumped in other
*Wasteful packaging? countries?
*Toxic waste generated? *Does the company respect
*Promotes wastage or workers?
conservation?
Social
Safety
* Is advertising true and
real?
* Has advertising influenced
me?
* Are there chemical
* Does it undermine my
additives ?
cultural values?
* Does it create social
*Are the ingredients safe ?
problems?
* What are the social costs
*Are production workers
of production and
safe ?
marketing ?