Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unjust vexation
None
Grave scandal
Malicious mischief
Direct bribery
Corruption of public official
None
Direct bribery
Estafa
Theft
Malversation
None
Parricide
Homicide
Murder
PAGE 1
with
Light threats
Unjust vexation
Slight physical injuries
Attempted homicide
Theft
Qualified theft
Robbery with violence and intimidation
Robbery with force upon things
Theft
Estafa
Malversation
Other deceits
Theft
PAGE 2
None
Other deceits
__ B.
__ C.
Concubinage
None
Qualified seduction
Adultery
Homicide
Murder
Administering injurious substance or
PAGE 3
beverage
Reckless imprudence resulting in
homicide
Grave threats
Grave coercion
Rape by means of intimidation
Grave coercion
Robbery with intimidation
Grave threats
__ B.
__ C.
PAGE 4
__ B.
__ C.
__ A.
__ B.
__ C.
Attempted theft
Frustrated theft
Consummated theft
PAGE 5
Unjust vexation
None
Simple slander by deed
Malicious mischief
__ C.
PAGE 6
__ A.
__ B.
__ A.
__ B.
__ C.
Malversation,
DBP
being
a
government bank
Estafa, A had possession of the money
which he appropriated with abuse of
confidence
Qualified theft. X has only physical
possession of the money and as teller
his
position
involves
trust
and
confidence
__ C.
None
Theft
Fencing
PAGE 7
__ B.
__ C.
Adultery
Grave scandal
Prostitution
None
__ B.
__ C.
__ D.
Libel, as it is an imputation of a
circumstance tending to cause
dishonor
Intriguing against honor
Unjust vexation
Slander
Slander by deed
Unjust vexation
Challenging to a duel
Light threats
PAGE 8
===========================================
ESSAY
===========================================
2010-2011; 2011-2012
1. Having decided a case in favour of the plaintiff,
the judge was given a gift by said plaintiff. The
decision was perfectly legal and just and in fact
when the defendant appealed the case to the
Supreme Court it was affirmed in its entirety. Did
the judge incur criminal liability?
Yes, the judge is criminally liable for indirect
bribery. All the elements of indirect bribery are
present in this case. First, the judge is a public
officer. Second, he accepted a gift from the
plaintiff. Third, he received the gift by reason of
his office. It is immaterial if the decision was
perfectly legal and just. By accepting the gift
which was given in anticipation of future favour,
he exposed himself to future corruption.
2. When is the taking of money bills used as
evidence in the trial of a case by the clerk of
court infidelity in the custody of document, and
when is it malversation?
A clerk of court is liable for infidelity in custody
of document if having received the money bills
as exhibits in a case, took away the money bills
used as evidence in the said case. When the
case is done and the money bills are to be
returned to its owner, the clerks custody is now
in the nature of a trust. Hence, when the clerk
appropriates it after the case is done, he is liable
for malversation.
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
PAGE 11
PAGE 12
PAGE 13
2008-2009
PAGE 14
PAGE 15
PAGE 16
of
trust
funds
of
the
GOOD LUCK
PAGE 17