MODELLING IN WATER

MANAGEMENT
&
HYDROINFORMATICS

Content

Introduction Hydroinformatics (HIS)

Historical context of HIS
Definition of Hydroinformatics
Influence of HW and SW on development of HIS
Simulation models cornerstone of HIS
Data for HIS
Information systems and HIS
Practical HIS - role or consultant
Future Trends

Prague Flood in 2002

Prague Flood protection

8/2002 mobile flood control

Prague Flood protection 8/2002

mobile flood control

Prague 2002 - modelling

Water Levels

2D flood model of Prague - flood 8 / 2002

The Sample of Results - Velocities

2D flood model of Prague - flood 8 / 2002

Maps of velocities

Hydroinformatics
Definition of Hydroinformatics:

Technological discipline (Abbott 1987)

integrating computationan hydraulics,
Hydrology, Hydraulics, Informatics, information
technologies into the framework, which
affectsevolutory development of society
The simulation model describing the aquatic
system is a basic element of hydroinformatics.

Teoretical fundaments of
Hydroinformatics
Hydraulics (physics of aquatic systems)

long tradition fundamental scientific discipline

Hydrology technological discipline

Computational hydraulics (Abbott - 1969)
Def.: scientific discipline integrating hydraulics,
numerical mathematics, numerical methods and
programming into unified framework

Informatics
Ecology, Biology, Chemistry

Goals of Hydroinformatics
To provide predictive tools for analysis of aquatic
component of living environment
To verify effects of interventions into ecosystems using ifthen scenarios
To integrate protection of living environment in the
engineering business
To provide managerial tools for complex aquatic systems
To optimize investment policy
To offer training of-line systems (operational games)
To support other technological areas (e.g. GIS, Expert
systems, DSS)
To provide foundation for legislations
To optimize engineering design work

Hydroinformatic system (HIS)

Set of interconnected tools acting as one unified
system and comprising substantial volume of
information and knowledge in digital form originating
mainly from

hydraulics
hydrology
results of applied research
area of law and legislation
area of social and economic espects
protection of environment (EIA)
informatics
data collection and monitoring

Hydroinformatic System (HIS) = Decision Support System (DSS)

Hydroinformatic System (HIS)

Information systems
Geografic
information
systems

Databases

Knowledge
bases

Models
User

User
interface
(GUI)

Pollution Transport
sources processes

Water
quality

Ecology

Decision Support systems

Strategic
scenarios

Impact of
environment

Socio economic
impacts

Conditions for Formation of

Hydroinformatics
Development of computational hydraulicssimulation models
Foundation of information technology
Trend for management of complex systems
Development of data acquisition, monitoring and
methods for data collection and analysis
Need for communication among distinct scientific
and engineering disciplines
Need for presentation technologies (animations)
Impacts of personalities (Abbott, Cunge, Ionescu,
Price, aj.)
Effects of institutions (NHL, DHI, DH, Hr, IAHR,
IAHS)

Conditions for Formation of

Hydroinformatics
Dynamics of
economical processes

New
technologies

Management
Managementand
and planning
in
planning
in urban
drainagearea
Water
utilities

Restricted
financial
sources

Protection of
living environment

Historical development of HIC

Hardware development personal computers

1980 - IBM PC
..
..
2005 Intel = 2 Core processors

Software development
operational systems (unification)
application software -(text editors, tabular processors, graphical
modules)
specialized SW - simulation models
standard databases connected to GUI
existence systm grafick podpory

Increasing use of simulation models in practical

engineering life

Historical development of HIC

Generations of simulation tools
1.generation - calculation of formulas - analog
2.generation - one-off models 60s, big labs
3.generation more general matematical models 70s, variability of
inputs

4.generation - menu-driven system technology based on PC, DOS,

weak graphics, low standardization 80s 90s

5.generation - today UNIX x WINDOWS, DB, quality graphics, GIS,

server client

6. generation - future (KBS, UI), RTC, max safety, ?

Simulation model
the Core of HIS system

RDBMS

Simulation - modelling
Models are tools able to simulate long term behaviour of physical
system by means of interpretation of dominant proccesses

Conceptual Models
Application of concept, that substitute for natural process ( nonlinear
reservoir)

Deterministic Models
Mathematical solution of differential equations describing the natural
process (hydrodynamic equations, continuity equation)

Stochastic models
Based on solution of natural processes by means of statistical
methods

Deterministic Simulation Models

digital copy of a physical system (1, 2, 3D)
simulation of physical processes important for the for
the studied phenomena (non stationarity, dynamics, continuity)
Q
+
t

Q2
A
x

+ gA y + gAi
x

= gAi

Q
H
+ bx
= 0
x
x

the same response to outer impuls like in nature

difficult to obtain input
data

h
h Q

Forecasts:
What happens,

happens, when.......
when.......

Simulation Model like virtual reality

Simulation models
Definition
program (digital code)
model (tool for user able to simulate reality)
matematical model x physical model
simulation tool
Model build :
1. problem definition
2. schematization (space and time)
3. governing equations
4. dependend, independent variables
5. empirical and complementary formula
6. algoritmization of task
7. boundary and initial conditions
8. calibration
9. verification
10. simulation

Modular structure of simulation model

Rainfall-Runoff

Advection-Dispersion
Hydrodynamics

Water Quality
Flood Forecasting
Sediment Transport

Rainfall-runoff processes
i

Precipitation
t

River Catchment

Receiving water

Q
t

Rainfall-Runoff Processes
Physical process models

Black Box models

Rainfall

precipitation

Evapotranspiration

Runoff from
catchment

Algorithm

Interception Storage

Loss-routing models

Depression Storage

Rainfall
Unsaturated Zone

Rainfall
Excess

Loss
model

Routing
model

Saturated Zone
CatchmentChannel
Storage

Runoff from
catchment

Runoff from
catchment

Ground water
transfers

Hydrodynamic Processes
System description
Looped network (1D, 1D+)
2D horizontal mesh

Hydraulic phenomena
Backwater effects
Flood Routing
Wave propagation
Energy dissipation

Hydraulic Structures
Weirs
Culverts
Bridges
Regulation
Gates
Pumping
Control Structures
Dambreak Failures

Hydroinformatics
and

Data

RDBMS

Need of information for optimal

management in complex systems
"Since post-industrial organisations will be faced with
increasing environmental complexity and turbulence,
organisations need to process information and make
decisions will be substantially increased", (Huber, 1984).
Dealing with information is one of the key factors for mastering
of problems in complex systems. (Ratzek, 1992)

Information technology is the basic tool, used by organizations,

to make forecasts, cope with the environmental changes and to
adjust to them (Malone & Rockart, 1993)

Current state of data

Change in approach to water related problems

Increasing demand on integrated solution

Impact of Information Technology
Focus on living environment

Changes in data reguirements

Increasing demand on data (quality and quantity)

Increase in cost for data collection, update and archiving
Need for quick and cheap data exchange
Demand on continual data update and maintenance

Current state of data sources

Large spectrum and volume of data

Only a part of the data in a digital form (IS)
Various specialized information systems
Various proprietary data structures, formats, data guality
Communications using export/import routines

Data for Simulation model

Structural data

Pipe (X,Y,Z, length, DN, roughness, slope, )

Manhole (X,Y,Z1,Z2, diameter, inlet, outlet)
Structures (pump, CSO, basin, gates, )
Catchment areas (size, slope, impermeability, inhabitnts)

Processes Data (time series)

Water consumption data

Flow data (v, h, Q)
Water quality data (O2, NH4, NO3, P)
Precipitation (i)

Operational data
Gates manipulation, pump QH,

Parameters in model

10

Data needs for simulation model

Data requirements are strongly
influenced by the type of simulation:
flooding
water quality
sediment transport
dam break

topological data for the river channel

(cross sections, objects)

topological data for the river inundation

(inundation profiles, objects in inundations photo, DMT)

hydrological and hydraulic data

(roughness, Q-H curves, manipulation rules for the objects,
precipitaion, water level and flow time series)

Additional data sources

[m]
35.0

Flags

30.0
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0

h [mm]

0.0

500
400
300

1-1- 1990

16-5- 1991

27-9-1992

523
419
355 372

9- 2-1994

445

24-6-1995

5-11-1996

20-3- 1998

513 534 475

427

200
100
0

199019911992199319941995199619971998

Untitled
-1037000
-1034000000

-1038000
-1036000000

-1039000
-1040000

-1038000000

-1041000

-1040000000

-1042000

-1042000000

-1043000

-1044000000

-1044000
-1045000

-1046000000

-1046000

-1048000000

-1047000
-1050000000

-1048000

-1052000000

-1049000
-1050000

-1054000000

-1051000
-1056000000

-1052000
-1058000000

-1053000
-1054000

-1060000000

-750000

-745000

-740000

-735000

-750000000

-745000000

-740000000

Users of data
Governmental
offices

Water utilities
GIS
CAD

RDBMS

RDBMS

Research
organisations
Specialised Simulation
tools
models

Owners
RDBMS

GIS
CAD

Private consulting companies

Simulation
model

GIS, CAD
RDBMS

Specialised
tools

11

Data manipulation aspect

START

START

MS-GIS TRANSFER

MS-GIS TRANSFER

1 CONTRACT

EXCELL TABLE
FROM MANHOLE SURVEY

2 CONTRACT

CREATE THEME
kanal_pkt_MS
FOR COLLECTOR KAKACH

FILL DATA FROM

go to Eryl's team

2 CONTRACT
IN DATA BASE

SITUATION PLAN IN CAD FORMAT

FROM MANHOLE SURVEY

Contractor
data

GIS THEMES
kan_pkt
kan_lin

/PROGRAM SOFIYSKA VODA/

VERIFICATION

CREATE

NO

NEW MANHOLE

DOES MANHOLE
EXIST IN GIS

aqva base

IN GIS THEMES
kan_pkt
kan_lin

EXCELL TABLE
FROM MANHOLE SURVEY

connectivity checks

YES
go to GIS team

DATA BASE c orrec ted

/PROGRAM SOFIYSKA VODA/

SITUATION PLAN IN CAD FORMAT

FROM MANHOLE SURVEY

Single data
evaluation

GIS \U+ 0442\U+ 0435\U+ 043C\U+ 0438:

VERIFICATION
DOES MANHOLE

NO
MOVE MANHOLES

HAS RIGHT LOCATION

kan_pkt
kan_lin

YES

kan_pkt
kan_lin

Data
Connectivity
check

HORISONTAL, VERTICAL
PLAN AND PHOTO
FOR MANHOLE

Field data
check survey

EXCELL TABLE
FROM MANHOLE SURVEY

kan_pkt
kanal_pkt_MS

ENTER DATA "A"

IN GIS THEMES

VERIFICATION
DOES MANHOLE

HAS RIGHTLOCATION

NO

CORRECTLOCATION
OF MANHOLES
IN GIS THEMES

kan_pkt
kan_lin

weir

YES

VERIFICATION OF NUMBERS
-FILL FIELD
RUN AVENUE SCRIPTS

Ms_No

TRANSFER MEASURED
DATA IN GIS THEMES

kan_pkt
kanal_pkt_MS

JOIN TABLES
kan_pkt
kanal_pkt_MS

CORRECT PROBLEMS
IN GIS THEMES

kan_pkt

kanal_pkt_MS

COPY FIELDS
WITH DATA"B"

FROM kanal_pkt_MS

RUN AVENUE SCRIPTS

TO kan_pkt

GIS data
Verification

Simulation
modelling

CUT THEME

kan_pkt

kan_pkt

kak_pkt

SAVE AS
kak_pkt

CUT THEME
kan_lin

kan_lin

kak_lin

SAVE AS
kak_lin

Other source
data

CUTTHEME
kan_lin

weir

kak_weir

SAVE AS
kak_weir

USE THEMES
kak_pkt
kak_lin
kak_weir
IN SIMULATION MODEL

Integration of data (GO HM Prahy)

Integration of data (Sofia DAP)

12

Data volumes
z

Sewer system - LIDS, 20M

Digital reference map of Prague, ArcInfo , 100M

Digital map of Prague, DGN, 48M

Ortophoto map of Prague, JPG, 77M,

DMT of Prague (10x10 m, 30 cm ) , 240M

Cartographic map of Prague, TIF, 80M

Groundwater levels, grid 30m x 30 m, MGE, 20M

9 years historical rainfall serie in 7 sites, ASCII, 5M

Development plans

Prague land register

maps of vegetation, protection zones

Measurement data (19i, 19Q, 25H)

Hydroprojekt,a.s.

Data volumes
z

Rainfall data - Gandalf, 500M

Matematical model of sewer system, MOUSE , 5000M

Matematical model of rivers, MIKE11, 2000M

Catchment data, PE, impervious areas, Mapinfo, 500M

Simulation results MOUSE, MikeView, 20000M

Simulation results MIKE11, MikeView, 10000M

Interpretation of data
Baltic sea
Adristic sea

Sewer data ?
X

Population data ?

Hydraulic data ?

?
?

Design
methods

Evaluation
methods

13

Interpretation of data
Relative distances

Measurements

X1 ,Y1

X2,Y2

X1,Y1

X1,Y1

X2,Y2

X1,Y1

topology

structures
L2

X2,Y2
L1
X1,Y1

X1,Y1

Interpretation of data

start

Integration and openness

CAD

GIS

SCADA

Models

Inspections

14

Data communication problems

Data formats - vektor x raster data, ASCII x BIN x RDB,
Data structure time series, summer/winter time, objects
Data conversions - topology of network, coordinate systems, units
Work with data data volumes, data management, changes, update
General topics quality of source data, costs, units, formats, SW a
HW errors

Unproductive, time consuming work bringing higher probability of random

or systematic errors and difficulties in a long term data maintanance.
! WRONG DECISIONS !

Example rainfall data

Historical rainfall series
[m]
35.0

415

Flags

30.0
25.0

PODBABA

RUZYNE

458

20.0

447

15.0

406

10.0
5.0
0.0

KLEMENTINUM

1-1-1990

UHRINEVES

BRANIK

27-9-1992

9-2-1994

24-6-1995

523

400

537

16-5-1991

5-11-1996

475

445

419

20-3-1998

534

513

500

h [mm]

492

KARLOV

427

372

355

300

LIBUS 483

200

100

1990

7 locations time serie 1990-1998

1991

1992

1993

1994

[m]
12.0

1995

1996

1997

1998

Flags

10.0
8.0

Average rainfall: 450 mm/year

6.0

Average year for simulations: 1994

4.0
2.0
0.0

Hydroprojekt,a.s.

9-2-1994

31-3-1994

20-5-1994

9-7-1994

28-8-1994

17-10-1994

6-12-1994

Example rainfall data

Measured rainfall 6.7.1999 1730 1830
[m]

[m]

Flags

50.0

40.0

30.0

30.0

20.0

20.0

10.0

10.0

0.0

0.0

17:30:00
6-7-1999
[m]

17:45:00

18:00:00

18:15:00

D13

D11

D12 D08
D15
D14

D07 D10

D18

D19

D02
D09
17:45:00

[m]
50.0

18:00:00

D17
D16

18:15:00
[m]
40.0

Flags

Flags

35.0

40.0
30.0

D06

D03

D04

17:30:00
6-7-1999

Flags

50.0

D05
D04
D01

Flags

50.0

D01

40.0

40.0

D02

D07

25.0

30.0

20.0

20.0

20.0

10.0

15.0
10.0

10.0

5.0

0.0
17:30:00
6-7-1999

30.0

D05

17:45:00

[m]

18:00:00

18:15:00

18:30:00

17:30:00
6-7-1999
[m]

Flags

0.0

0.0
17:40:00

17:50:00

18:00:00

18:10:00

18:20:00

Flags

17:30:00
6-7-1999
[m]

17:45:00

18:00:00

18:15:00

Flags

50.0
40.0

40.0
30.0

30.0

30.0
20.0
10.0

10.0

0.0

0.0

0.0
6-7-1999

D06

20.0

10.0

Hydroprojekt,a.s.
17:30:00
17:45:00

D14

40.0

D03

20.0

18:00:00

18:15:00

17:30:00
6-7-1999

17:45:00

18:00:00

18:15:00

17:40:00 17:50:00 18:00:00 18:10:00 18:20:00

6-7-1999

15

Example Rainfall data

Processed rainfall intensities - 6.7.1999
17 30

17 48

17 55

17 57

17 51

17 53

18 01

18 06

Hydroprojekt,a.s.

Hydrological data
Catchment data
Catchment delineation, areas
snow elevation zones

Hydrological and meteorological data

Water level and Discharge hydrographs

Rainfall amounts
Evaporation
Snow cover
Temperature

etc.

Databases
b (storage width)

Topographical Data:
Data
River cross-sections
Flood plain topography
Channel & Flood plain
roughness
Structure geometry
Time Series Data:
Data
Boundary conditions,
Calibration and Verification
Additional data-type:
Q-h boundary data

flood plain

channel

flood plain
h (elevation)

Discharge [m3/s]

Time

16

Hydrodynamic data
Topography data

Cross section data

(all the same DATUM !!)
Flodplains data
(width, volume, area, DEM,..)
Aerial/Satelite/Radar images of flood extents
Reservoirs data
(control strategy, spillways ...)
Structures description (control strategy, geometry ...)
data in geographical coordinates
background maps

Hydraulic data
Water level and Discharge hydrographs
Rating curves
Peak water level during significant events (used for
calibration and verification)

etc.

GIS and other IS

Geografical information systems
ESRI
MAPINFO
INTERGRAPH

GIS what is it for?

Graphical presentation of geographically distributed data
graphics is based on database oriented information
Tools for topological data presentation, processing and analysis

Priority for user:

firstly: data analysis and pilot project for data collection and
definition of requirements for IS

Hydroinformatics and
Project

17

Role of consultant
Engineer coordinator:
Information into the numbers, symbols and codes
Interpretation of results
Etical aspect
Communication between specialists on defined platform
HIS expert :
Specialized teams - multidisciplinary character of work

Experts in hydraulics, hydrology, chemistry; ecologists

mathematitians
IT experts
Communications and measurement experts

Problem Formulation
Phase E

Phase C+D
MIKE11 Vltava river model

MOUSE HD,AD model

MIKE11 river model

BLACK BOX treatment

plant model
3,2
1,4
0,8

2,2

3,6

0 ,4

MOUSE NAM runoff model

1,5

MOUSE HD, AD sewer model

2,8

Phase F
MOUSE NAM runoff model

1,6 5

2 ,4

1,6

0,85

MOUSE HD,AD model

MOUSE NAM runoff model

MIKE11 river model

System Schematisation
[m]
-1042200
B_O5B
V166Os
V165

-1042400

A_O18A

B
V167

A_0

-1042600

[m]
[m]

P2

-1042800

B_O11B

-1043000

-1037000
-1037000

A_O1A

-1043200

-1038000
-1038000

-1043400

BS
BS

-1039000
-1039000

A_O20A

A_O15A
Os

A_O2A
A_O16A

Os
Vl

F2
F2
F2

-1044000
-1044200
D1
D1
D1

A_O13A

A_O21A

D
D

-1042000
-1042000

-1044400

B
B

C
C

M_0

A_O4A

A_O9A

A_O14A

A_O10A

Po%%232
Po%%232
Po%%232

A_O11A

-1044600

-1043000
-1043000

-744500

-744000

-743500

-743000

-742500

-742000

-741500
[m]

F3
F3
F3

M
M

-1044000
-1044000

A
A

-1045000
-1045000
-1046000
-1046000

A_O20A

-1043600
-1043800

BS1
BS1
BS1

-1040000
-1040000
-1041000
-1041000

V123

Solid
Solid
Stod
Stod

-1047000
-1047000

Jih
Jih

-1048000
-1048000

112B
112B
112B

Barr
Barr
Barr

-1049000
-1049000

KSB
KSB

-1050000
-1050000

JM
JM

-1051000
-1051000

modr
modr

-1052000
-1052000
-1053000
-1053000
-750000
-750000

-745000
-745000

-740000
-740000

-735000
-735000

-730000
-730000
[m]
[m]

18

Model

Monitoring
19 flowmeters
24 water level meters
19 rain gauges
3 WQ samplers

Model Calibration

simulan model

[M 3 / S E C ]
0 .7 5

T i m e s e r ie s o f D I S C H A R G E

B R A N C H E S

(1 _ 0 4 0 7 . p r f )

0 .7 0
0 .6 5
0 .6 0
0 .5 5
0 .5 0
0 .4 5
0 .4 0
0 .3 5
0 .3 0
0 .2 5
0 .2 0
0 .1 5
0 .1 0
0 .0 5
0 .0 0
1 2 :0 0
4 -7 -1 9 9 7

0 0 :0 0
5 -7 -1 9 9 7

1 2 :0 0

0 0 :0 0
6 -7 -1 9 9 7

1 2 :0 0

0 0 :0 0
7 -7 -1 9 9 7

19

Model calibration - discharge

[M3/SEC]

Time Series DISCHARGE BRANCHES (CD_CAL22.PRF)

0.50

[M3/SEC]
0.45

[M3/SEC]
2.0

Time Series DISCHARGE BRANCHES (CD_CAL22.PRF)

3.6
3.4

0.40

Time Series DISCHARGE BRANCHES (CD_CAL22.PRF)

3.2
0.35

3.0
2.8

1.8

0.30

2.6
2.4

0.25

1.6

2.2
0.20

2.0

1.4

1.8

0.15

1.6

1.2

0.10

1.0

1.4
1.2

0.05

1.0

0.8

0.8

0.00
20-6-1999

0.6

25-6-1999

30-6-1999

5-7-1999

10-7-1999

0.6

15-7-1999

00:00:00
29-6-1999

00:00:00
30-6-1999

[M3/SEC]

00:00:00
1-7-1999

00:00:00
2-7-1999

00:00:00
3-7-1999

00:00:00
4-7-1999

0.4

OK2D

0.4
0.2

29-6-1999

1-7-1999

BS Q03
RK
Q01
RK
OK1E Q02
E
CSHH
H01
Q04

Q05

00:00:00
5-7-1999

7.0

3-7-1999

5-7-1999

[M3/SEC]

7-7-1999

9-7-1999

11-7-1999

13-7-1999

Time Series DISCHARGE BRANCHES (CD_CAL22.PRF)

0.50

CSSH

Time Series DISCHARGE BRANCHES (CD_CAL22.PRF)

8.0

0.45

0.40

0.35

0.30

0.25

H02

6.0
5.0

3.0

Q08

2.0
1.0

C1

0.0
30-6-1999

[M3/SEC]

5-7-1999

10-7-1999

0.20

OK1C
H03
C2 Q07
A

4.0

0.15

0.10

B
OK1B

Q06

00:00:00
21-6- 1999

00:00:00
22-6-1999

00:00:00
23- 6- 1999

[M3/SEC]

15-7-1999

[M3/SEC]

Time Series DISCHARGE BRANCHES (CD_CAL22.PRF)

00:00:00
24-6-1999

00:00:00
25-6- 1999

00:00:00
26-6-1999

00:00:00
27-6- 1999

00:00:00
28- 6-1999

Time Series DISCHARGE BRANCHES (CD_CAL22.PRF)

1.4

Time Series DISCHARGE BRANCHES (CD_CAL22.PRF)

4.0

1.3

3.5

1.2
1.1

3.0

5.5

1.0
2.5

0.9

5.0
2.0

0.8

4.5

0.7

1.5

Q09
Ck10

4.0
3.5
3.0

0.6

1.0

0.5

0.5

sb. K

sb. I

0.4
06:00:00
6-7-1999

2.5

09:00:00

12:00:00

15:00:00

18:00:00

21:00:00

sb. II

2.0

00:00:00
7-7-1999

03:00:00

[M3/SEC]

0.3
0.2

T ime Series DISCHARGE BRANCHES (CD_CAL22.PRF)

1.2

H20

1.5

00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
21-6-1999 22-6-1999 23-6-1999 24-6-1999 25-6-1999 26-6-1999 27-6-1999 28-6-1999 29-6-1999

1.1
1.0

1.0

Q22
SBI

0.5
19-6-1999

21-6-1999

[M3/SEC]

23-6-1999

25-6-1999

27-6-1999

0.9

Q23

Time Series DISCHARGE BRANCHES (CD_CAL22.PRF)

1.0
0.9

0.7

sb. I

0.50
00:00:00
13-7-1999

12:00:00

00:00:00
14-7-1999

12:00:00

0.40

00:00:00
15-7-1999

0.30

H22

Sb.P
H21
NN

0.5
0.4

0.60

0.2

Po

0.6

0.4
0.3

127
Q20

0.8

0.3

Time Series DISCHARGE BRANCHES (CD_CAL22.PRF)

0.80
0.70

Q26

Q24
P Q25
SBII

Motolsk c.
H25

1.2
1.1

0.6
0.5

1.4
1.3

[M3/SEC]

0.8
0.7

H24

sb. I I

0.2

Q27
112a

112B
Q28

0.20
0.10
00:00:00
9-7-1999

sb.P
[M3/SEC]

00:00:00
10- 7-1999

00:00:00
11-7-1999

00:00:00
12-7-1999

00:00:00
13-7-1999

00:00:00
14- 7- 1999

00:00:00
15- 7- 1999

00:00:00
16-7-1999

Time Series DISCHARGE BRANCHES (CD_CAL22.PRF)

0.70

19-6-1999

21-6-1999

23- 6-1999

25-6-1999

27-6-1999

29-6-1999

0.65

Od 7.6.9 9 prepojen

0.60
0.55
0.50

[M3/SEC]

Time Series DISCHARGE BRANCHES (CD_CAL22.PRF)

0.45
0.40

1.2

0.35

1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8

Q21

0.7

V ltava

0.6
0.5

[M3/SEC]

7-7-1999

9-7-1999

11-7-1999

13-7-1999

0.15
0.10

25-6-1999

1.1
1.0

30-6-1999

5-7-1999

10-7-1999

Time Series DISCHARGE BRANCHES (CD_CAL22.PRF)

0.9

erpac
stanice

0.7

15-7-1999

0.25
0.20

0.05

[M3/SEC]

0.8

5-7-1999

PKS

Mo

1.1
1.0
0.9

0.1

0.30

Q29
H23
LKS

Time Series DISCHARGE BRANCHES (CD_CAL22.PRF)

0.4
0.3
0.2

0.8
0.7
0.6

0.6
0.5

0.5

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2
0.1

0.1

21-6-1999

3-7-1999

5-7-1999

7-7-1999

9-7-1999

11-7-1999

13-7-1999

23-6-1999

25-6-1999

27-6-1999

29-6-1999

1-7-1999

3-7-1999

15-7-1999

Complex model calibration

KEY

NS

xxx

No obs erved data rec orded

xxx

See individual event comments for reasons for non-compliance

xxx

Recorded velocity errors (res ulting in c riteria non-c omplianc e)

xxx

Recorded depth errors (resulting in c riteria non-complianc e)

Ref

Com parative analysis Event A

Not in s urc harge conditions

xxx

Rec orded depth & veloc ity errors (resulting in c riteria non-c ompliance)

xxx

Average within c riteria - c ons idered verified

xxx

Average not within c riteria due to rec orded errors (or no data) - model acc eptable

xxx

Average not within c riteria - s ee individual c omments for potential model limitations

Within
Criteria?

Event C

Average

Within
Criteria?

(%)

13.0

YES

-6.0

Y ES

-18.4

NO

-3.8

Y ES

FS61 Flow V olume

(%)

28.4

NO

15.1

Y ES

1.9

YES

15.1

Peak Depths

(mm)

85.0

YES

34.0

Y ES

20.0

YES

46.3

Y ES

(%)

Peak Flow s

Peak Flow s

Within
Criter ia?

Event B

Within
Criteria?

NO

Y ES

Low
Peak flow s

High
-15

25

11.3

YES

13.0

Y ES

-38.1

-4.6

Y ES

FS62 Flow V olume

(%)

0.7

YES

-1.5

Y ES

-27.4

NO

-9.4

Y ES

Flow Volum e

-10

20

Peak Depths

(mm)

70.0

YES

43.0

Y ES

5.0

YES

39.3

Y ES

Peak Depths

-100

500

Analysis and interpretation of results

RECK potok

Prtok ve Vltav
[ m

/ s

. 0

. 0

. 0

. 0

. 0

. 0

. 0

i m

r i e

i s

: 0

r g

( V

: 0

. R

Fikt. BS
CSO-1F
CSO-1E

Fict. D

Fikt. E+F
WWTP

. 0
. 0
. 0
. 0
. 0
. 0
. 0
0

[ m

: 0

. 0

. 5

. 0

. 5

. 0

. 5

. 0

. 5

. 0

. 5

. 0

: 0

: 0

: 0

: 0

BSK5 ve Vltav

/ l]

i m

r i e

t r a

t i o

( V

: 0

: 0

: 0

. R

: 0

: 0

: 0

: 0

Fikt. A+B

Fikt. SBI

. 0
0

ROKYTKA

OK14k

. 5

CCS HH CSO-1C
Fikt. C1

: 0

: 0

: 0

: 0

: 0

Vtok z OV

[M 3 /S E C ]

T im e

: 0

S e r ie s

: 0

: 0

: 0

: 0

: 0

: 0

: 0

: 0

Fikt. 112
D IS C H A R G E

B R A N C H E S

( V a r 0 _ e 2 .p r f)

7 .0

Fikt. 112B

6 .5

MOTOLSK potok

6 .0
5 .5
5 .0
4 .5

Fikt. SBII

4 .0
3 .5

0 0 : 0 0 :0 0
2 0 - 7 - 1 9 9 3

1 2 :0 0 :0 0

0 0 :0 0 :0 0
2 1 - 7 - 1 9 9 3

parameter

1 2 :0 0 : 0 0

0 0 :0 0 : 0 0
2 2 - 7 - 1 9 9 3

1 2 :0 0 : 0 0

0 0 : 0 0 :0 0
2 3 - 7 - 1 9 9 3

1 2 : 0 0 :0 0

0 0 :0 0 :0 0
2 4 - 7 - 1 9 9 3

1 2 :0 0 :0 0

jednotky

Standard

Simula e

O2

[mg/l]

>5

4.5

BOD

[mg/l]

< 10

8.1

Ammonia

[mg/l]

< 1.5

1.28

Nitrate

[mg/l]

< 31,0

18.3

Phosphorus

[mg/l]

< 0.4

0.54

0 0 :0 0 :0 0
2 5 - 7 - 1 9 9 3

Fict. NN
BOTI

DALEJSK potok

Fict. PO
KUNRATICK potok

Fikt. PKS
Fikt. LKS

20

Analysis and interpretation of results

Amonia
21%
5%

Total WWTP production

74%

Total CSO production

BOD
29%

Total inflow to the city

3%

68%

Phosphorus
37%
60%
3%

Impact parameter

BSK5
[t/year]

CHSK
[t/year]

NL
[t/year]

N tot
[t/year]

N-NH4+
[t/year]

P tot
[t/year]

Total inflow to the city

8 700

62 500

44 500

47 500

270

400

Total impact from CSOs

430

1 100

640

107

60

20

Total impact from WWTP

3 700

12 600

5 800

4 100

950

250

Analysis and interpretation of results

From
OK_56K
OK_57K
OK_70K
RN
OK_71K
OK_72K
OK_73K
OK_75K
OK_77K
OK_78K
OK_79K
OK_80K
OK_81K
OK_83K

To
963114
9815155
OK_70KO
V_RN
539015
544029
B9
OK_75KO
0
479073
B4
OK_80KO
OK_81KO
OK_83KO

Qmax
1.8
1.5
9.9
9.6
0.2
3.8
0.0
1.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0

No
7
4
17
10
2
5
0
13
6
0
0
0
0
1

From
To
Tot T [hour] Suma max.
3.5
3 500
OK_56K 963114
2.6
3 150
OK_57K 9815155
15.2
37 700
OK_70K OK_70KO
15.8
36 400
RN
V_RN
0.8
150
OK_71K 539015
3.5
8 500
OK_72K 544029
0.0
0
OK_73K B9
8.7
2 500
OK_75K OK_75KO
3.0
270
OK_77K
0
0.0
0
OK_78K 479073
0.0
0
OK_79K B4
0.0
0
OK_80K OK_80KO
0.0
0
OK_81K OK_81KO
0.3
600
OK_83K OK_83KO

MaxT[hour]
1.3
1.2
2.5
3.1
0.6
1.3
0.0
1.7
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
Suma Tot.
6 400
5 100
102 800
87 000
250
14 100
0
6 900
500
0
0
0
0
600

DHI Software Suite

21

MOUSE sewer model

AQUAbase graphical DRBMS

RAINGEN rainfall simulator

22

Gandalf - monitoring

MIKE View - postprocessing

MIKE NET water supply

23

MIKE 11 1D river model

MIKE 21 2D flooding

Mike Urban

24

Mike Basin

Integrationnstroj
of hydroinformatic
tools
Integrace
Hydroinformatiky

Flood plain

Combining 1D & 2D
models, i.e.
MOUSE & MIKE 21

MIKE FLOOD
Combines 1-D and 2-D modelling

Detailed flood plain modelling

River
Water
Wastewater

Detailed urban flood modelling

25

3D models
MIKE SHE
FLUENT

DIMS
Framework for real-time modelling & DSS applications
MOUSE

MIKE11

MIKE NET

Third party modelling software

DIMS
SCADA or telemetry
systems

Economic Systems
(like Microsoft Navision - SAP)

DIMS
Communication
EFOR

DIALOG

MIKE NET

MOUSE
DIMS

DIMS

RADAR

SCADA
SCADA

MIKE11/21

26

Operational Dashboard
Dashboard: Web interface to
sensors, alarms, data, and
hydraulic models.

Project aims and objectives

To build a model linking mechanism for:
run time data exchange between models, databases & tools

In order to:
improve ability to model complex scenarios
Climate change

Evaporation

Precipitation

Reservoir yield

Ecology
Ecolo
gy

Flow

Planning

Ecology

Floods

Evaporation

Surface runoff

Coast

Estuary

Groundwater

Droughts

Aquifer yield
Water quality
80

For further information go to: www.HarmoniT.com or email: rvm@ceh.ac.uk

Future trends ???

CAD

GIS

SCADA
Inspections
Models

27

Pros of Hydroinformatics
Better knowledge of water system
Better (cheaper and more effective)
decisions
Positive effect on living environment
Effective use of investments

Cons of Hydroinformatics

price of HIS systems (SW and HW)

complexity of HIS systems
garbage in garbage out effect
dramatic change of approach

Scientists from company RAND created model of home computer", how it would look
like in 2004. ..

From "Popular Mechanics" - 1954:

28