Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1617/s11527-012-9867-5
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Received: 7 October 2011 / Accepted: 7 May 2012 / Published online: 6 June 2012
RILEM 2012
1 Introduction
The clinkerisation of the constituent materials of
cement requires high energy consumption and release
of carbon dioxide. Since the Kyoto Protocol, cement
industries have tended to reduce the greenhouse gas
emissions during cement manufacturing including the
decarbonation of limestone. Replacing cement by
mineral additions is a promising way to reduce the
environmental impact of concrete. Generally, these
mineral additions are fly ash and blast-furnace slag,
which are considered as industrial waste or byproducts. However, some standards [28] put limits
on the use of mineral additions, when they are used
during the concrete mixing.
In the study presented in this paper, mineral
additions were used to partially replace the cement
at higher contents than the maximum ratios given by
the standards. A high rate of substitution of cement is
likely to affect the early age compressive strength. To
tackle this problem, these concrete mixtures with high
rate of mineral additions were optimised using Bolomeys equation. Second-day compressive strength of
10 MPa (at 20 C) was targeted because it allows
rapid removal of formwork [24]. Although this first
approach gave quite satisfactory results from the view
point of mechanical properties, its validation needs to
1706
2 Experimental program
2.1 Materials and mixture proportioning
The studied concrete mixtures were made of crushed
coarse aggregates (10/14 and 6/10 mm) and sea sand
(0/4 mm), Portland cement (CEM I 52.5 N), mineral
additions such as blast-furnace slag and fly ash, and a
polycarboxylate type superplasticizer. Physical properties of cement and mineral additions are detailed in
Table 1. These mineral additions were used at different volume proportions of the binder (b): 50 and 75 %
of blast-furnace slag for 50GGBS, 50GGBSOpt,
75GGBS and 75GGBSOpt respectively and 50 % of
fly ash for 50FA and 50FAOpt (Table 2).
Tests were carried out at 20 C for two different
series of mixtures: non-optimised concrete mixtures
(50GGBS, 75GGBS and 50FA) and optimised concrete
mixtures (50GGBSOpt, 75GGBSOpt and 50FAOpt)
(Table 2). Non-optimised mixtures are characterised by
identical effective water content (Weff), volume of paste
(Vpaste) and granulometric curve. In the case of
optimised mixtures, these parameters were modified to
obtain a compressive strength equal to 10 MPa at 2 days
(Table 3). Therefore, optimised mixtures are characterized by lower w/b and w/c ratios, higher cement content,
lower water content, volume of paste equal or higher
than non-optimised mixtures, and higher superplasticizer content. The details of the mix proportioning
method are given in Khokhar et al. [24].
2.2 Testing procedures
2.2.1 Mechanical properties
Concrete cylinders were cast then stored at 20 C and
95 % relative humidity (RH). They were demoulded
after 23 h and were put into a curing tank maintained at
20 C until the test time. Compressive and tensile
strengths were measured at 2, 7 and 28 days on three
samples. Tensile strength measurements were realized
by means of splitting tests. Dynamic elastic modulus of
concrete specimens was also monitored during 28 days
by means of impulse excitation tests (Grindosonic
device).
2.2.2 Free shrinkage
Free shrinkage measurements were carried out on
cylindrical (11 cm , 22 cm high) and prismatic
specimens (7 9 7 cm, 28 cm high), equipped with
metal studs at each end. The specimen was placed
Table 1 Physical properties of the cementitious materials
Cement CEM I
GGBS
Fly ash
3.11
2.89
2.24
Blaine (m /kg)
340
462
405
Passing 45 lm (%)
95
98
80
Density (g/cm )
2
1707
50GGBS
50GGBS
Opt
75GGBS
75GGBS
Opt
50FA
50FA
Opt
Cement
303
146
163
72
103
126
174
Blast-furnace slag
146
163
215
309
Fly ash
126
174
Composition (kg/m3)
Waeff
182
182
171
182
170
182
170
Sand 0/4
855
855
855
855
817
855
824
Gravel 6/10
211
211
211
211
202
211
203
Gravel 10/14
875
875
875
875
836
875
843
Superplasticizer
1.6
0.9
2.8
0.8
2.2
0.6
0.62
0.52
0.63
0.41
0.72
0.49
Characteristics
w/bb
w/c
0.6
1.25
1.05
2.54
1.65
1.45
0.98
Vdpaste (l/m3)
279
279
279
280
310
279
304
Vw/Veb
1.87
1.87
1.57
1.87
1.21
1.87
1.26
by aggregates
Table 3 Compressive (fc) and tensile (ft) strength, cracking risk (CR), age of cracking from ring test and calculated relaxation for the
optimised and non-optimised mixtures
fc (MPa)
2 days
CEM I
50GGBS
50GGBSOpt
75GGBS
75GGBSOpt
50FA
50FAOpt
ft (MPa)
7 days
28 days
2 days
CR
7 days
28 days
Age of cracking
(days)
Relaxation at
7 days (%)
29.6
38.9
49.1
2.3
3.0
3.9
3.4
60
8.0
16.0
33.1
1.0
2.1
3.5
3.2
40
73
12.5
21.9
39.1
1.6
2.5
3.9
3.2
55
3.3
16.0
33.4
0.8
1.5
3.1
3.6
13
57
12.0
36.5
53.8
1.5
2.9
4.2
3.2
29
41
4.8
7.1
11.7
0.7
1.1
1.7
4.4
69
12.5
19.0
30.0
1.4
2.0
3.1
3.4
34
1708
1 ta
R21
R20
R20
1 ta R21
R20
R21
R21
R22
1
R22
R21
2
rel t rmeas t
100
rel t
However, the drying kinetics of ring and cylindrical-shape specimens is not similar. This difference of
behaviour was taken into account through the shrinkage model used by [1] (Eq. 6). These authors defined
the shrinkage strain (esh,tot) as a function of the drying
time (t) and the ultimate shrinkage strain (esh,?). The
parameter Ns is the time in days to reach half of
ultimate shrinkage. Following [2], this parameter can
be expressed as a function of the drying path length Ld
[10] used in (Eq. 7). The Ld value for the ring test is
equal to 17.5 mm. This value was determined by
means of the experimental shrinkage curves and
(Eq. 6) for the cylindrical-shape specimens. Its value
is equal to 8.8 mm.
t
esh;tot t esh;1
6
t Ns
Ns 20:1 exp0:063 Ld
1709
2.2.4 Porosity
Capillary porosity and pore size distribution of
concrete were measured using mercury intrusion
porosimetry (MIP), which can detect pores with
diameters ranging from 0.003 to 360 lm. The capillary porosity of material has been considered within
the interval characterized by pore diameters between
0.01 and 5 lm. In these experiments, tests were
performed on samples of mortar extruded from fresh
concrete to limit the influence of the aggregates
porosity on these measurements. The hydration of the
samples was chemically stopped at 1, 2, 7 and 28 days.
Then they were stored in a vacuum oven at 60 C for
24 h.
1710
1 day
2 days
7 days
28 days
CEM I
1.04
0.44
0.18
0.10
50GGBS
1.31
1.05
0.67
0.18
50GGBSOpt
75GGBS
0.68
2.53
1.05
2.08
0.28
1.06
0.10
0.18
75GGBSOpt
1.33
1.60
0.23
0.05
50FA
3.08
1.60
0.83
0.43
1711
intrinsic property of concrete material. So, its evolution would be difficult to predict by means of model
such as Eurocode 2. However, the total shrinkage of
the optimised mixtures with 50 % of mineral additions
was always lower than that of CEM I for both types of
specimen shape. These results showed that dealing
with the total shrinkage of the studied concrete
mixtures the differences of behaviour were kept no
matter the shape of specimens.
3.1.3 Relation between drying shrinkage and mass
loss
Table 5 Mass loss values at 28 days for prismatic and cylindrical-shape specimens
Mass loss (%)
Prismatic
specimen
Cylinder-shape
specimen
CEM I
1.9
1.3
50GGBSOpt
2.8
2.2
50FAOpt
3.5
2.8
1712
The second phase of drying shrinkage is characterized by a linear relationship between the deformation
and the mass loss. The slope of this curve is the
parameter CF called hydrous compressibility factor
[19] (Table 6). Mineral additions also affected the
second phase leading to an increase in the value of the
parameter CF, especially for the concrete mixtures
with blast-furnace slag. Thus, the drying shrinkage in
the second phase was slightly accelerated for 50 and
75GGBS. This observation was confirmed by the
curves of drying shrinkage (Fig. 3).
3.2 Cracking risk
Fig. 8 Evolution of tensile strength at 7 days and capillary
porosity at 1 day as function of mass loss at the end of the first
phase of drying shrinkage
allowed decreasing this value. To explain this behaviour, the parameters affecting this first phase (the
tensile strength at 7 days and the capillary porosity at
1 day) were normed in comparison to their maximal
value and expressed as a function of the mass loss at
the end of this phase. Figure 8 showed that the tensile
strength decreased whereas the capillary porosity
increased with mass loss. The low tensile strength of
the concrete mixtures with mineral additions (Table 3)
this first phase by making the cracking on the
specimen surface easier. This microcraking is likely
to relax the stresses due to shrinkage (see first theory).
The concrete behaviour during the first phase (a low
shrinkage value and a high percent of mass loss) was
also emphasized for the mixtures with mineral additions by their larger capillary porosity at 1 day (age of
exposure to drying). This last point was also confirmed
by the results of Bissonnette et al. [9]. They found that
the initial weight loss comes mainly from the decrease
in water content of large capillary pores (according to
the second theory). These first results did not show
clearly which parameters affected mainly the evolution of this first phase. So, the decrease in mass loss
percent during the first phase for the optimised
mixtures may be related to both their larger tensile
strength and their lower capillary porosity at 1 day.
CR
Table 6 Hydrous compressibility factor CF (coefficient from linear part of curves giving drying shrinkage versus mass loss)
CF
CEM I
50GGBS
50GGBSOpt
75GGBS
75GGBSOpt
50FA
50FAOpt
350
485
525
490
520
400
390
1713
1714
4 Conclusions
In this study, an experimental program was designed
to investigate the effect of high substitution of
Portland cement by mineral additions on the longterm deformations and the cracking risk of concrete.
The studied mixtures were designed following two
approachesan elementary substitution of cement by
mineral additions and an optimisation of these mixtures in terms of their early age mechanical performance. Different observations were underlined:
References
1. Almudaiheem JA, Hansen W (1987) Effect of specimen size
and shape on drying shrinkage of concrete. ACI Mater J
84:130135
2. Almudaiheem JA, Hansen W (1989) Prediction of concrete
drying shrinkage from short term measurements. ACI Mater
J 86:401408
3. Al-Saleh SA, Al-Zaid RZ (2006) Effect of drying conditions, admixtures and specimen size on shrinkage strains.
Cem Concr Res 36:19851991
4. Baroghel-Bouny V, Godin J (2001) Experimental study on
drying shrinkage of ordinary and high-performance
cementitious materials. Concr Sci Eng 3:1322
5. Bazant ZP, Baweja S, (2000) Creep and shrinkage prediction model for analysis and design of concrete structures:
model B3, Adam Neville symposium: creep and shrinkagestructural design effects, ACI SP194, Farmington
Hills, pp 183
6. Benboudjema F, Meftah F, Torrenti JM (2005) Interaction
between drying, shrinkage, creep and cracking phenomena
in concrete. Eng Struct 27:239250
7. Bisschop J (2002) Drying shrinkage cracking at early ages,
RILEM TC 181-EAS: final report, early age cracking in
cementitious systems, pp 4755
8. Bisschop J, van Mier JGM (2002) How to study drying
shrinkage microcracking in cement-based materials using
optical and scanning electron microscopy? Cem Concr Res
32:279287
9. Bissonnette B, Pierre P, Pigeon M (1999) Influence of key
parameters on drying shrinkage of cementitious materials.
Cem Concr Res 29:16551662
10. Bryant AH, Vadhanavikkit C (1987) Creep, shrinkage-size,
and age at loading effects. ACI Mater J 84:117123
11. CEB-FIB (1999) Structural concretetextbook on behaviour, design and performance, Updated knowledge of the
CEB/FIB Model Code 1990, vol 1, p 224
12. Chan YW, Liu CY, Lu YS, (1998) Effect of slag and fly ash
on the autogenous shrinkage of high performance concrete,
Autogenous shrinkage of concrete, In: Tazawa E (ed) Proceedings of the international workshop, 1314 June, Hiroshima, pp 221228
13. Chern JC, Chan YW (1989) Deformations of concrete made
with blast-furnace slag cement and ordinary Portland
cement. ACI Mater J 86:372382
1715
14. Chindaprasirt P, Homwuttiwong S, Sirivivatnanon V (2004)
Influence of fly ash fineness on strength, drying shrinkage
and sulfate resistance of blended cement mortar. Cem Concr
Res 34:10871092
15. Darquennes A, Staquet S, Kamen A, Delplancke-Ogletree
M-P, Espion B (2009) Early age properties development of
concrete with different slag contents, ACI SP-259, Transition from fluid to solid: re-examining the behavior of concrete at early ages, San Antonio 1519 March, pp 4366
16. Darquennes A, Staquet S, Delplancke-Ogletree M-P, Espion B (2011) Effect of autogenous deformation on the
cracking risk of slag cement concretes. Cement Concr
Compos 33:368379
17. Darquennes A, Khokhar I, Rozie`re E, Loukili A, Grondin F,
Staquet S (2011) Early age deformations of concrete with
high content of mineral additions. Constr Build Mater
25:18361847
18. Granger L, Torrenti J-M, Acker P (1997) Thoughts about
drying shrinkage: scale effects and modelling. Mater Struct
30:96105
19. Granger L, Torrenti J-M, Acker P (1997) Thoughts about
drying shrinkage: experimental results and quantification of
structural drying creep. Mater Struct 30:588598
20. Hanehara S, Hirao H, Uchikawa H, (1998) Relationships
between autogenous shrinkage and the microstructure and
humidity changes at inner part of hardened cement paste at
early age, Autogenous shrinkage of concrete, In: Tazawa E
(ed), Proceedings of the International Workshop, Hiroshima, 1314 June, pp 93104
21. Holt E (2005) Contribution of mixture design to chemical
and autogenous shrinkage of concrete at early ages. Cem
Concr Res 35:464472
22. Hossain AB, Weiss WJ (2004) Assessing residual stress
development and stress relaxation in restrained concrete
ring specimens. Cement Concr Compos 26:531540
23. Khelidj A, Loukili A, Bastian G (1998) Experimental study
of the hydro-chemical coupling inside maturing concretes:
effect on various type of shrinkage. Mater Struct
31:588594
24. Khokhar MIA, Rozie`re E, Tucry P, Grondin F, Loukili A
(2010) Mix design of concrete with high content of mineral
additions: optimisation to improve early age strength.
Cement Concr Compos 32:377385
25. Martinez Y, Cabrera F, Pozzo E (1992) Experimental control of deformability at short-term loadings in testing largespan prestressed structures. Mater Struct 25(4):231238
26. Muller HS, Kuttner CH, Kvitsel V (1999) Creep and
shrinkage models of normal and high-performance concreteconce for a unified code-type approach. Revue
francaise de genie civil 3(34):113132
27. Muller HS, Kvitsel V (2001) Kriechen und schwinden von
beton. Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 97:819
28. NF EN 206-1 (2004) BetonPartie 1: specification, performances, production et conformite, p 91
29. Radlinski M, Olek J, Nantung TE (2011) Shrinkage and
cracking of ternary concrete under various conditions.
Concr Int 33(1):4955
30. Rozie`re E, Granger S, Turcry Ph, Loukili A (2007) Influence of paste volume on shrinkage cracking and fracture
properties of self-compacting concrete. Cement Concr
Compos 29:626636
1716
31. Sellevold EJ, Bjntegaard , (2006) Driving forces to
cracking in hardening concrete: thermal and autogenous
deformations, In: Marchand J, Bissonnette B, Gagne R,
Jolin M, Paradis F (eds), 2nd International symposium on
advances in concrete through science and engineering,
Quebec city, pp 125139, 1113 Sept
32. Tangtermsirikul S (1998) Effect of chemical composition
and particle size of fly ash on autogenous shrinkage paste,
Autogenous shrinkage of concrete. In: Tazawa E (ed)