Journal of family issues

1.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.

Journal
Formal
Argumentative

Psychology (intelligence)

In sum, the attributes of direction, adaptation, and criticismall central aspects of

intelligencemay influence the individuals proclivity to divorce. During marriage, these
three interrelated aspects of intelligence offer vital resources for the individual to preserve
his or her relationship. Intelligent persons may be well prepared to face the challenges of
marriage because they are capable of exploring the many possible avenues that can lead to
resolution of their marital problems. (ovo je citat s kraja lanka, najbolje da to napiem u
svoje 3 reenice)
9. U prvih pet paragrafa treba sloit reenicu koja bi najbolje ukratko opisala taj paragraf.
2.
1. In their classic study on intelligence, Benet and Simon (1916) define the central aspect of
intelligence as judgment or good sense: the ability to adapt ones self to various circumstances.
(Defining Intelligence)
2. Discrete-time methods are used to estimate the monthly hazard of divorce. Although Cox
proportional hazard models would yield similar findings, we choose discrete-time methods because
the models easily incorporate time-varying covariates and can be estimated with logistic regression
(Allison, 1995). (describing of the methods)
3. Characteristics such as race and ethnicity, age at marriage, family income, employment status,
religious affiliation, and parental divorce have all been found to affect the rate of divorce (Bramlett &
Mosher, 2002).
4. In sum, the attributes of direction, adaptation, and criticismall central aspects of intelligence
may influence the individuals proclivity to divorce.
3.
1. budget budet, partner partner
2.
3. https://www.englishclub.com/vocabulary/phrasal-verbs-list.htm
4. http://esl.about.com/od/engilshvocabulary/a/collocations.htm

5. Researchers employing this perspective argue that characteristics individuals possess prior to their
marriage can affect their chance of divorce.
Future studies may be able to include other variables that could explain the association between
intelligence and divorce.
6. Because there was reason to believe that the effect of employment differed by gender, we
estimated models with interactions between gender and the employment indicators, but these
interactions were not significant and thus are not shown in the model. (prva etiri predikata/glagola
su u vremenu Past Simple, a zadnji predikat u Present Simple u pasivu.

4.
1. Characteristics such as race and ethnicity, age at marriage, family income, employment status,
religious affiliation, and parental divorce have all been found to affect the rate of divorce ( page
1723.)
2. Because of the high prevalence and the negative consequences of divorce, it is not surprising that
numerous studies are devoted to understanding the factors that predict divorce. (page 1723)
3. Because of the high prevalence and the negative consequences of divorce, it is not surprising that
numerous studies are devoted to understanding the factors that predict divorce. (page 1723)
4. odnosi se na objanjavanje u reenici
5. odnosi se na suprotne rijei : bogat siromaan, crn-bijel
6. http://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-synonyms.html
7. The selection perspective is often used to explain who divorces.
More intelligent people may be better able to critique their own spousal role performance, which
should make them more flexible and responsive spouses than those who cannot see their own
limitations.
If we compare the predicted odds of divorce for an individual whose intelligence is one standard
deviation above the mean to an individual whose intelligence is at the mean, the former individual
has an odds of divorce that is still 14% lower (0.99115 0.99100 = 0.86).
Because of the high prevalence and the negative consequences of divorce, it is not surprising that
numerous studies are devoted to understanding the factors that predict divorce.
Those with greater financial resources, especially those who own their homes, may also find divorce
a less attractive option because of the loss involved when property is divided (e.g., Booth, Johnson,
White, & Edwards, 1986; South & Lloyd, 1995)