Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ALEXANDER HIMSLEY
Himsley Engineering Limited, Toronto, Ontario
Component balances
Except in nuclear reactions, mass can neither be
created nor destroyed, but a particular chemical
species can be destroyed through conversion to another species. Therefore a species o r component
balance has a n additional t e r m as compared to a total
mass balance. The component balance must be
written
input by flow = output by flow
accumulation
disappearance due t o chemical reaction o r other nonflow causes
FC
+ d( V C ) / d t + d( WL)/dl + 0 .
. (1)
575
FC
+ d(VC)/dl + R
(2)
Here the last term on the right hand side is not zero.
There is disappearance of the component for which
the balance is written from the control volume by a
process other than bulk flow. Each term in the above
equation has units of amount of material per unit
of time. The last term on the right hand side is the
rate of ion exchange.
The rate of ion exchange, as is well known, is
determined by resin particle size and pore structure,
size of the diffusing ion, electrical characteristics,
etc., and in general by the instantaneous concentration and gradient of concentration, of ion in the
liquid and in the solid (resin) phases. Despite the
existence of many hundreds of papers on the subject,
it is not yet possible to predict reliably from these
fundamental factors the numerical value of the rate
of ion exchange. In any case, i t is entirely adequate
at the present point in the discussion to represent
this complex functionality by R. Several workers in
the ion exchange fieldc6)have referred to R as the
function representing the kinetics of the ion exchange process. I t will be shown below however that
while there is of course a t all times a numerical
value of the rate of ion exchange, there is in effect
no such thing as kinetics in the ion exchange field
in the usual sense of the term.
Now writing the component balance for the control
volume consisting of the solid phase only, we have
0
+ d(WL)ldl + ( -R)
(31
FC
+ d(WL)/dt..
(4)
FC, = FC
R
(5)
which is a steady state equation. Thus, the peculiarities of the applicable system of simultaneous differential equations lead to an inadvertant dropping
of all transient effects if the transient term for the
liquid is omitted. In one ~ a s e ~ ~
the
, next step was
differentiation, which retains the appearance of a
differential equation but does not change the fact
that the equations which a r e being handled describe
a steady state situation only, and are thus not applicable to ion exchange.
Numerous sets of experimental data on concentration in the effluent as a function of time for agitated
ion exchange beds have been published and these
data of course demonstrate clearly t h a t the situation
is one of unsteady state. Examples are Figure 10 of
Belter et al, Figure 4 of Marchello and Davis), and
Figure 6 of Slater.
Belter et
correctly wrote Equation (1) includi n g the transient term for the liquid phase. However
576
FC,-I = FC,
d(V,C,,)/dl
0 = d(W,L,)/dt - R . .
+R
(h)
I?J
t , minutes
minutes. These values can be visualized as the intersections of the curves in Figure 1 with a vertical line
drawn at t = 135 minutes.
By trial and error a r a t e function was found which
allowed an approximate simulation of this set of experimental data. The comparison between experiment
and calculation in this format is shown in Figure 2.
The same r a t e function was used in obtaining Figure 1.
The trial and error procedure involved assuming a
rate function, solving the differential equations to
yield concentration in the liquid a s a function of
time, and comparing the calculated values at t = 135
minutes with the experimental values. This trial and
error procedure involved not only adjustable parameters within the assumed function, but also the
form of the function itself. The rate function which,
among those tried, yielded the best agreement between experimental and calculated values is
R
6/(R5
+ Ro) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(8)
where
R.5
1/40C.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Re
3L/(3600-L). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (10)
(9)
2 0990
Lo
I
I
r
%
0900
:
m
3
*
e
-
0600
0300
60
/ I
cn
0100
l
n
0010
c
0
/ I
u
0 001
2
3 4
6 8
stage number ( log scale1
0 5
10
concentration in liguid, grorn/liler
577
(11)
FC
lidLjdl
+ VdC/dl + r M
rll
1131
12)
7,<=
V/F
WjF
(15)
11
+ r VdC/dI + 7 , , r
(ISJ
and
clLldt
Acknowledgment
Maurice Grimes and other members o f the renearcb and ile\v!loimic,nt.
staff of Rio Algom Mines Ltd.. Elliot T.ake, Ontaria, were of I(iciit
help in obtaining the experimental data. Hans Feige wrote the rginiiiiiter program used in the mlrulatiuns. Financial siipwrt foi. the h l i i i l y
W ~ Hrecwived in gart from the industikl researvh Proaram of
the.
National Research Council of Canada.
Nomenclature
c,
F
L
r
R
t
I<ef erences
Himsley, A,, Paper piesenled :it Canadian Uranium I r w l i i c ( ~ r ~
Association meeting, Elliot I,ake, Ontariv, May 1!)73.
Slater, M. J.. Canadian Mining a n d Metallurgical I%ulletir~.
67
( 7 4 2 ) , 93 (February 1974).
Stevenson. D. G., Proceedings, Conference on lon Exchaiiw. i i i
the Process Induatries 1969, pages 114-120 (puhl. 1!17Ii hy Srwii*tg
of Chemiral Industry, London, England)
Himsley, A., Paper presented at Canadian Mineral PI,(II.~+.LI(II..,
conference, Ottawa, January 1975.
Belter, 1. A,, Cunningham, F. I,. and Chen, J . W.. l%iotrh.aml
Bioeng.. 15, h33 (1973).
Marehello, J. M. and Davis, M. W., Jr., IEC Fundamentals. 2 I I I ,
27 ( 1 9 6 3 ) .
Slater. M. J. and PrudhiJmme, l., MineR Branch Terhnir.al
Bulletin TB 158, DeiJartnient of Eneray, Mines and Hesi,urces.
Ottawa, September 1872 (Infurmation Canada ratalrrlr N I I . M X i 20/158).
117)
Mnnusrript ieceived F e b ~ ~ i i i r2y0 , 1!)75 : arceljted f o r Iiublieation. .Iiine
1 7 , 1975.
578
Y
of