You are on page 1of 12

DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN STORMS FOR URBAN RUNOFF

ESTIMATION AND DRAINAGE DESIGN IN NIGERIA

BY

AGUNBIADE, AKINYEMI OLUWASEYE


Ph.D/SEET/2013/502

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING


FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY,
MINNA

MAJOR SUPERVISOR: ENGR. PROF. O. D. JIMOH


CO-SUPERVISOR:
CO-SUPERVISOR:

SEPTEMBER, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
1.0. INTRODUCTION

2.0. METHODOLOGY

3.0. WORK PLAN

References

1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
The concept of urban drainage management involves the use of Hydrologic and
Hydraulic principles to locate, design, size, and construct structures that will aid in the
timely capture and safe conveyance/dispersion of stormwater runoff. The essence of
performing these procedures is to prevent flooding due to urbanization. These hydraulic
structures within the built-up environment could include culverts, bridges, conduits,
channels, and detention/retention ponds.
In the process of drainage design, the idea of a design flood is introduced, which is
the flow peak or discharge hydrograph associated with a return period (frequency). This
design peak flow can be estimated by using the following procedures (WMO, 2009):
(a) Flood frequency based on a flow series of adequate length;
(b) Empirical equations based on a regional flood frequency analysis;
(c) A Design rainfall, which is fed into a rainfall-runoff model in order to estimate the
discharge.
Due to the relative scarcity of flow data compared to precipitation measurements, option
(c) is usually the most preferred choice. It is generally assumed that this design
rainfall/storm subsequently generates a design flood/flow of the same return period,
although this might not be true because of antecedent soil moisture conditions and other
hydrologic parameters.
The decision regarding design frequency is really a statement of acceptable risk of
system capacity being exceeded. An economic and/or political analysis by public
decision makers indicates that a prescribed risk level is acceptable, this risk level is then

assigned to the design storm and the resulting design is assumed to preserve this risk
level. (Wenzel and Voorhees, 1981).
Design Storms can be gauged events or synthetic events. Since future rainfall
characteristics cannot be predicted, a convenient way of using rainfall data is to analyse
long gauge records to define the statistical characteristics of the rainfall, and then to use
these statistics to produce synthetic rainstorms of various return periods and durations
(Loucks, Van Beek, Stedinger, Dijkman, and Villars, 2005) .

The most widely used method for the determination of peak flows from the design
storm in urban drainage design is the Rational Method (WMO, 2009).

Q = 0.0278CAI

(1.1)

Where:
Q = peak discharge in m3/s,
C = dimensionless runoff coefficient, which is a measure of the degree of
imperviousness of the catchment; this ranges from 0 to 1, higher values signifying
greater imperviousness.
A = the catchment area from the point of interest in km2.
I = average design rainfall intensity in mm/hr.
The duration used for the determination of the design precipitation intensity is the time
of concentration, t (minutes), of the watershed.

Of all the values to the right of equation (1.1), the hardest to determine is the design
storm intensity, and this is because of the unpredictable nature of rainfall. Typically,
rainfall intensities are determined from Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) curves or
Depth-Duration-Frequency (DDF) curves; these are plots of average rainfall intensity

(or depth) versus duration of the event rainfall. There are usually several curves plotted
on a single graph, one for each of the different rainfall frequencies (Figure 1.1).
Ideally, one or both of these graphs (or a tabular form thereof) are supplied by the local
governmental authority under whose auspices the work is being done.

Figure 1.1: Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) Curve. Source: (DID, 2000)

First, the time of concentration is determined. Then, in the case of the IDF curve, the
graph is entered with time of concentration and the rainfall intensity or depth is read at
the intersection of the duration coordinate and the corresponding design frequency
curve.
In the absence of pre-existing IDF or DDF curves, the engineer must develop the
information that is required from local or nearby rainfall data. However, for all practical
purposes, the necessary rainfall data are seldom available, and if they are available, the
3

cost of developing the rainfall frequency relations is seldom justifiable in terms of any
design project where the Rational method is applicable (e.g. drainage design for a
subdivision, an industrial park, a shopping centre, etc.). (Mays, 2001)

1.2 Statement of the Problem


Prior to 2013, the only authoritative official document published for the design of
Hydraulic Structures was the Nigerian Highway Design Manual (FMWH, 1973). Chief
among the inadequacies of this document were:
a) The IDF charts and equations are developed for only three (3) locations in Nigeria,
namely Lagos (Apapa), Kano, and Ikeja. Calculations of intensities for other
locations are highly subjective because it depended on the ability of the design
engineer to determine areas of similar rainfall regimes, and make calculations based
on the assumption of direct proportionality between the desired locations total
annual rainfall and compared rainfall intensities.
b) The IDF curves and equations were also derived from only 7 years of data (19381944), and are presented for storm durations of 15mins to 24hrs, and recurrence
intervals of up to 25yrs.
c) Units of measurements used in the manual were all in unfamiliar imperial units, this
necessitates the conversion of units back and forth.

Between the years 1973 and 2013 however, numerous research and several papers were
published by eminent Nigerian academics and professionals in attempts to deal with the
inadequacies therein and develop design storms for various locations in Nigeria.
(Ayanshola, Salami, Olofintoye, and Abdulkadir, 2014; Isikwue, Onoja, and Laudan,
2012; Nwoke and Okoro, 2012; Ogunlela, Adewale, and Adamowski, 2012; Okonkwo

and Mbajiorgu, 2010; Olofintoye, Sule, and Salami, 2009; Oyebande, 1982; Oyegoke
and Oyebande, 2008; A W Salami and Sule, 2009; Adebayo Wahab Salami, Bilewu,
Ayanshola, and Oritola, 2009; Sule and Alabi, 2013; Uzoigwe, Mbajiorgu, and
Alakwen, 2012)

By year 2013, an official update to the Nigerian Highway design manual was released
(FMW, 2013), this included significant improvements to the 1978 edition. The IDF
locations had been increased to 35, with durations from 6mins to 24hrs and return
periods up to 100yrs.

Although this research topic was conceived before the unveiling of this recent
document, there is still need for an independent analysis of the available rainfall data
and subsequent comparisons to determine the adequacy of the results presented therein.

The main reason for the absence of a standard national document to this effect, despite
the presence of seasoned academics and professionals, can be attributed to the lack of
widespread gauged rainfall data at the required resolution. Most precipitation records
are available at daily (24hr) totals, meanwhile urban storm events of concern are dealt
with at a sub-daily timeframe (especially in minutes). There is therefore need to
research proven methods for rainfall disaggregation to enable extraction of sub-hourly
data from these daily totals.

1.3 Aim and Objectives


The aim of this study is to undergo a rigorous analysis of available up-to-date
rainfall data for Nigeria, and generate design storms suitable for urban drainage
design. The specific objectives include:
a) To develop IDF curves, tables, and equations for available data locations using
standard global procedures and local constraints.
b) Production of Isohyetal/Isopluvial maps of the computed storm durations and
return periods.
c) Comparison of completed works with the current authoritative document in the
country and other academic/professional works in the field.
d) Performance of a sample urban drainage design to demonstrate the procedure
for use of the finished works.

1.4 Justification Of Study


This study will assist engineers to perform more objective hydrologic designs for
urban drainage management. Indeed from field experience, it has been observed that
at best, engineers use the obsolete IDF charts presented in FMWH (1973); at worst
they use existing rules of the thumb to size hydraulic structures, which would likely
lead to costly over-design or dangerous under-design of these structures.

2.0 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Data Collection: This will involve sourcing of national precipitation data from all
available agencies and private organizations, including satellite rainfall estimates.
Quality control and data infilling procedures will be performed on the received data
to ensure integrity.
2.2 Climate Review and Regionalization: due to foreseen scarcity of nationally
representative results, regionalization of the rainfall data will be performed based
on spatially similar rainfall patterns and average depths.
2.3 Storm Disaggregation: This will involve the temporal downscaling of daily
rainfall totals to hourly and sub-hourly values. It is envisaged from previous
experience that the highest widely available rainfall resolution for the country is
typically daily/24hr totals.
2.4 Statistical/Frequency analysis: this includes the extraction of annual maximum
series for the selected rainfall durations (see 2.5), parameter estimation, distribution
fitting, and tests for goodness-of-fit.
2.5 IDF charts: production for standard durations of:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 30 minutes
1, 2, 3, 6, 12 hours
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 days,
For 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 years return periods.
2.6 GIS analysis and Isohyetal/Isopluvial map production: for Nigeria for all given
durations and return periods.
2.7 Sample Design: of storm drainage system to demonstrate the uses of the final
product.

3.0 WORK PLAN


YEAR 2014

ID

TASK / MONTH

YEAR 2015

YEAR 2016

J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

1 Introduction & Literature review


2 Proposal Preparation
3 Proposal Submission
4 Methodology Design
5 1st PhD Seminar & Proposal Defence
6 Annual Progress Report 1
7 Apply For Research Grant
8 Data acquisition & Fieldwork
9 Model Development
10 Data Analysis
11 Modelling & Results Presentation
12 2nd PhD seminar Presentation
13 Annual Progress Report 2
14 Calibration, Validation, & Review
15 Discussion & Conclusion
16 Thesis Draft Presentation
17 Thesis Review & Corrections
18 Paper Preparation
19 Conference presentation/ publishing
20 3rd PhD Seminar Presentation
21 Final Corrrections & Production
22 Thesis Submission

REFERENCES
Ayanshola, A., Salami, A., Olofintoye, O. & Abdulkadir, T. (2014). Development of
Storm Hydrographs for three rivers within Drainage Network in Kwara State, Nigeria
using Snyders Method. Nigerian Journal of Technological Development, 7(1).
DID. (2000). Urban Storm Water Management Manual for Malaysia (MSMA) (First
Edition.). Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Malaysia.
FMW. (2013). Nigerian Highway Manual Part 1: Design (Second Edition.). Federal
Ministry of Works.
FMWH. (1973). Nigerian Highway Manual Part 1: Design (First Edition.). Federal
Ministry of Works & Housing.
Isikwue, M. O., Onoja, S. B. & Laudan, K. J. (2012). Establishment of an empirical
model that correlates rainfall-intensity-duration frequency for Makurdi area, Nigeria.
International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology, 5(1).
Loucks, D. P., Van Beek, E., Stedinger, J. R., Dijkman, J. P. & Villars, M. T. (2005).
Water Resources Systems Planning and Management: An Introduction to Methods,
Models and Applications. UNESCO.
Mays, L. W. (2001). Stormwater Collection Systems Design Handbook (First Edition.).
McGraw-Hill New York.
Nwoke, H. U. & Okoro, B. C. (2012). Rainfall Intensity-Frequency Regime For Warri,
South-South Nigeria. Journal of New Clues In Sciences, 2, 4249.
Ogunlela, A., Adewale, P. & Adamowski, J. (2012). Developing Design Storm
Hydrographs for Small Tropical Catchments with Limited Data. Ethiopian Journal of
Environmental Studies and Management, 5(4), 356365.
Okonkwo, G. & Mbajiorgu, C. (2010). Rainfall intensity-duration-frequency analysis
for Southeastern Nigeria. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal,
12(1).
Olofintoye, O., Sule, B. & Salami, A. (2009). Best-fit Probability distribution model for
peak daily rainfall of selected Cities in Nigeria. New York Science Journal, 2(3),
2009.
Oyebande, L. (1982). Deriving rainfall intensity-duration-frequency relationships and
estimates for regions with inadequate data. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 27(3),
353367.
Oyegoke, S. & Oyebande, L. (2008). A new technique for analysis of extreme rainfall
for Nigeria. Environmental Research Journal, 2(1), 714.

Salami, A. W., Bilewu, S., Ayanshola, A. M. & Oritola, S. F. (2009). Evaluation of


synthetic unit hydrograph methods for the development of design storm hydrographs
for Rivers in South-West, Nigeria. J Am Sci, 5(4), 2332.
Salami, A. W. & Sule, B. F. (2009). Establishment of Rainfall Intensity Model for
Selected Towns in Nigeria Based on Sherman Equation. 1st Annual Civil
Engineering Conference University of Ilorin, Nigeria.
Sule, B. & Alabi, S. (2013). Application of synthetic unit hydrograph methods to
construct storm hydrographs. International Journal of Water Resources and
Environmental Engineering, 5(11), 639647.
Uzoigwe, L., Mbajiorgu, C. & Alakwen, O. (2012). Development of Intensity Duration
Frequency (IDF) Curve for Parts of Eastern Catchments using Modern Arcview GIS
Model. Special Publication of the Nigerian Association of Hydrological Sciences,
2444.
Wenzel, H. G. & Voorhees, M. L. (1981). An evaluation of the urban design storm
concept. University of Illinois, Water Resources Center.
WMO. (2009). Guide to Hydrological Practices: Management of Water Resources and
Application of Hydrological Practices (Sixth Edition., Vol. 2). World Meteorological
Organization.

10

You might also like