ADDITIONAL TRAVEL / LICENSE CASE LAWS A "person" "driving" an automobile cannot be stopped to see if he or she is licensed to "drive" unless there is reasonable suspicion the "person" has engaged in criminal conduct. Delaware v Prouse, (1979) 440 US 648, 59 Led2d 660. “No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.” Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105 “If the state converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.” Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262 A right which is free and open to all is not the subject of a license or tax. Chicago v Collins, 51 NE 907;Freeburg v Dawson 274 F 240 “Traffic infractions are not a crime.” People v. Battle, 50 Cal. App. 3.step 1, 123 CaLRptr. 636,639. Licenses As Applies To Exercising Other Constitutionally Secured Rights "The practice of law cannot be licensed by any state/State." Schware y. Board of Examiners, United State Reports 353 U.S. pages 238, 239. "The practice of law is an occupation of common right.” Sims v. Ahern, 271 SW 720 (1925) Licenses are for the conduct of a business, profession, occupation, the exercise of such when they are a privilege. licensing is in the nature of a SPECIAL PRIVILEGE entitling licensee to do some thing that he would not be entitled to do without a license. San Fransisco v Liverpool, 74 Cal 113. Where a private occupational statute exists, of which the intent is regulation of private commercial occupations, the particular agency enforcing that private statute, shall not apply it_by trickery and deceit, and threat and misrepresentation, to persons regulated and taxed, nor should it permit any party to do so, in violation of persons right to stay out of compelled contract, when he is not a person subject to the statute, unless clearly with its words, State vs Eberhard , 179 P 853; 246 p2d 1011.Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 17, 28 USCA "Next Friend" ‘A next friend is a person who represents someone who is unable to tend to his or her own interest. Litigants can be assisted by unlicensed laymen during judicial proceedings. in ‘Argersinger "No accused may be deprived of, his liberty as the result of any criminal prosecution, whether felony or misdemeanor, in which he was denied assistance of counsel." RAILROAD TRAINMEN v. VIRGINIA BAR, 377 US. 1 (1964) GIDEON y. WAINWRIGHT, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) Argersinger y. Hamlin 407 U.S. 25 (1972) 70-5015 Members of groups who are competent non-lawyers can assist other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with "unauthorized practice of law.” NAACP vy. Button, 371 U.S. 415) United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715Johnson v. Avery, 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969) “Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional ri liability, For they are deemed to know the law.” Owen v. Independence, 100 8.C.T, 1398, 445 US 622 If you have relied on prior decisions of the supreme Court, you have the perfect defense for willfulness. U.S. v. Bishop, 412 US 346 Courtesy of RV. Bey Publications in association w/ Moors Heritage and History School / Moors Order Of The Roundtable