Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Title:
Adventures in Balancing
Source/Author:Trish Whaley, Nelson Baxter - Abm Technical Services
Product:
Corrective
Technology: Corrective
Classification:
ADVENTURES IN BALANCING
BALANCING TECHNIQUES
CASE HISTORIES
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
BY
NELSON L. BAXTER
ABM TECHNICAL SERVICES
FLEXIBLE
Note that the process of taking initial readings, adding trial weights and then
retaking the data to determine the influence coefficients is the same in each
case.
STATIC COUPLE BALANCING:
Static Couple Balancing is a method which can either be performed
graphically or on the computer. This procedure is very important when
flexible symmetric rotors are being balanced, in that it can reduce the
number of shots that need to be installed. It is particularly applicable to
balancing large steam turbines. The figure below shows the unbalance
vectors from two rotors, which operate above their first critical.
The polar plot on the left shows that the phase angles for the two bearings
are nearly in phase with one another. This indicates that equal amounts of
weight should be added on each end at exactly the same angular location.
By adding a trial weight in each end in this manner, the solution weights can
be added in the second run, rather than on the third run, had a standard
dual plane approach would have been used.
The polar plot to the right shows the unbalance vectors from a rotor
operating near its second bending mode. This is typical for a low pressure
rotor on a steam turbine. As can be seen, the thing to do is to add equal
amounts of weight 180 degrees apart on opposite ends of the rotor. As
stated above, once this is performed with a trial weight, the solution weights
can be added on the second run.
The above method works well with flexible rotors, which operated near their
bending modes. It also helps if the rotor and bearing stifnesses are
symmetrical. Saving a balance shot on a large turbine can represent tens or
hundreds of thousands of dollars, so the above approach is therefore often
utilized by the utility industry.
FOUR RUN NO PHASE BALANCING:
This method is a very old technique, but is being mentioned because
sometimes it is the only way out of a bad situation. It is useful when:
1:It is not possible to get a once per revolution tach pulse or view the rotor
with a strobe.
2: Your photocell battery goes down or the unit doesn't work for some
reason.
3: Your analyzer or balancing instrument fails and all you have is a hand
held unit.
Some disadvantages are:
1: It requires 4 runs
2: At some point on one of the runs, the trial weight will end up being either
right on the heavy spot or close to it. This can result in high levels of
vibration and possibly driving the system nonlinear. Obviously, if the user
was not in a bind, this approach would not be used, but it is at least a way
out, when things get real tough.
THE FOLLOWING ARE THE REQUIRED STEPS FOR THE FOUR RUN
METHOD
THE FIGURE BELOW SHOWS THE FINAL SOLUTION FOR A 4 RUN NO PHASE
BALANCE EXAMPLE
The above graphical solution shows that there is a net effect of 1 Mil, as
measured from the center of the original circle to the intersection point of
the three trial weight circles. Since the original amplitude without the trial
weight was three mils, this means that the solution weight required would
be three times the trial weight.
When the effect vector is projected to the edge of the original circle, it
intersects the original circle at approximately 10 degrees clockwise from the
240 degree location. That is the location where the solution weight needs to
be installed.
The final solution is therefore to install 3 times the trial weight at the 250
degree location.
BALANCING CASE HISTORIES
THERMAL VECTOR IN MOTOR The figure to the left shows the presence
of a thermal vector on a large 4000 BP motor. This problem occurred
following an overhaul to the motor. Initially upon startup, the motor would
run smoothly. However, when load was applied, the vibration would
increase and the bearings would be destroyed. The motor was returned to
the shop for balancing and finally was sent back to the manufacturer for
high speed balancing. In each case, when the motor was returned and put
under load, the vibration would return and the bearings would be destroyed.
Proximity probes were installed on the motor and the vibration level was
measured throughout the load range, with the results depicted on the polar
diagram above. The solution was to install a compromise balance shot to
offset the thermal vector. The after balance shot thermal vector is illustrated
on the polar plot. The root cause of the problem was found to be shorted
laminations, which were the result of the motor repair shop dropping the
rotor.
less than 1 mil. The multiple balance attempts in the motor were all
unsuccessful. An analysis of the situation indicate t at t e fan was the
source of the vibration. The fact that the motor balance attempts were
unsuccessful, combined with the fan phase angles leading the motor angles
led to this conclusion. The addition of balance weight to the fan reduced
both the fan and the motor levels.
Note !- on large fans where the motors are mounted on a common
pedestal, it is not uncommon for the motor vibration to exceed that of the
fan even thou h the fan is the source.
A BALANCER'S NIGHTMARE
The situation in the figure to the left is truly a balancing person's vision of a
nightmare. The machine train is a motor generator set on a dragline. There
are six rotors solidly coupled sharing seven bearings, all of which are sitting
on a metal deck. In this case to complicate factors even more, a structural
resonance was found to be present near the operating speed of the MG set.
Balance weight was added to the plane next to the bearing with the highest
vibration. Levels went down in the horizontal direction, but up in the vertical
direction. The first two generator units were uncoupled from the train in
hopes of narrowing down the problem. Even though they were uncoupled,
their levels were still very high. The problem was found to be unbalance in
the motor combined with a structural resonance.
first critical speed. In addition, the steam temperature at the center of the
rotor is 1000 degrees F. After a number of years, these rotors will become
bowed a few thousanths of an inch. The phase angles from end to end are
in phase and the problem looks like a standard static unbalance where
equal amounts of weight need to be added in each end. However, when the
static shot is installed, their is almost no effect. What is required is to install
a shot at the middle of the rotor.
was no part of the shaft visible for a phase reference. The fan was in the
roof, so it was also very hard to obtain phase measurements from it. The
four run no phase method was therefore used to solve the problem.
The figure on the left shows the circle from the original run, along with the
three circles from the three trial runs. The distance from the center of the
original circle to the intersection of the three trial circles represents the
effect of the trial weight. The ratio of the original amplitude to the effect
times the trial weight gives the amount of solution weight. The projection of
that effect to the edge of the original circle shows where the final weight
should be located.
Getting good data for use in the balancing process is often challenging. The
most difficult part of the process is often to obtain a reliable once per
revolution pulse. The following are some of the potential problems which
can occur in regards to getting a good tach pulse.
Note !- On the market are now available phase locked loop strobe lights
which fire off of a filtered peak from the accelerometer which can overcome
some of the problems associated with normal tach pulse devices.