P304

Application of Spectral Decomposition Seismic

Attribute for Identification Geological
Characteristics
M.R. Saadati Nejad (Amirkabir University), H. Hassani* (Amirkabir
University), M.M. Khorasani (National Iranian Oil Co.), A. Javaherian
(University of Tehran) & M.R. Sokooti (National Iranian Oil Co.)

SUMMARY
Seismic interpretation in principal tries to find any small changes, as subtle stratigraphic plays and areas of
low-relief faulting. Looking at the amplitude of reflections at particular frequencies may be helpful to see
more clearly features which may not be seen from a fixed map view. Spectral decomposition breaks the
seismic signal into its frequency components. This title refers to methods produces frequency spectrum of
each sample of seismic trace. The method includes variety of algorithms, continues wavelet transform
(CWT) and Fast Fourier transform (FFT) are most common in exploration.
Although work is not the first attempt to translate attributes to, but an effort to visualize geological
features in presence of reef structure in Sarvak, directly from geophysical data. The results from spectral
decomposition display of 3D seismic data enable interpretation of seismic data very fast and effective in
comparison with standard interpretation have done in previous works.

71st EAGE Conference & Exhibition Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 8 - 11 June 2009

Introduction
Usually conventional seismic and their attributes are used to interpret the geophysical data to
the geology. Data contains wide range of frequencies sometimes could hide a particular event
that is trying to be detected. Spectral decomposition is a quick and effective method that gives
better definition to determine stratigraphic architecture and structural features.
Seismic interpretation in principal disciplines tries to find seismic geomorphology. To study
any small changes, especially subtle stratigraphic plays or areas of low-relief faulting, in it
may be helpful to look at the amplitude of reflections at particular frequencies. With this
technique it is possible to analyze independently each frequency revealing features that were
hidden before, to see more clearly features which may not be seen from a fixed map view.
Since time-frequency mapping is a non-unique process, there exist various time-frequency
analysis methods. The first and widely used method is the short-time Fourier transform
(STFT) in which a time-frequency spectrum is produced by taking the Fourier transform over
a short time window (Cohen, 1995). The continuous wavelet transform (CWT) provides
represents the frequency band from scaled wavelet, has an advantage as does not relate to a
fix window.
The target carbonate formation has with two major fancies, a massive limestone containing
Rudists the other is deeper water fancies of thinner bedded limestone. According to analogy
reefs occur in the first layer in the area, but absence of wells data is a problem to reach the
formation directly. This paper tries to evaluate geophysical this potential.
Methodology
The study is performed on 3D seismic data; the wells did not touch the target formation in the
interested area (Figure1). The seismic data was not high frequency and post stack band
limited filtering and scaling was performed in processing sequence. Therefore data was not
ideal for such studies. In order to evaluate presence of this reef according to temporal
thickness, both FFT and CWT were applied to data as each one has advantages. The Time
horizons, picked with some guide lines then auto tracked to whole area. The result horizon
then smoothed in order to prevent and misreading amplitude in cube.
The FFT method, which is a window base method, is the classical way to extract and evaluate
frequency spectrum of data in seismic data processing, when experts interested in data from a
long window. To concentrate on the target area (e.g. a faulted horizon slice) we need
decreasing the window length, the frequency resolution in frequency domain will be
compromised.
The continuous wavelet transform (CWT) provides a different approach to time-frequency
analysis. It produces a time-scale map. Since scale represents a frequency band, it is not
intuitive if we wish to interpret the frequency content of the signal; the advantage is
calculation does not need any window of data.
The isopatch map of Mishrif in Figure1 displays a build up, that show the formation has a reef
probable structure as thickness tends to be zero out above the structure and in Figure2 show
onlap on reef structure with Gamma-ray log. The RMS amplitude of Mishrif horizon slice
(Figure3) shows a ring pattern around the paleo-high. Relief around the horizon shows a
thickness of the formation is in creases in the direction. This ring relief baselap (onlap) system
track (shading event) in south-west field believed this anomaly belongs to reef structure.
Inverse relation between frequency and tuning thickness representation that this system track
was thinner from South-West flank toward center of structure and this event can
representation sediment an onlap system track on reef structure. Figure 5 show this event as
from South-West flank toward center (Iranian coastal) this event is thin whereas the thickness
of reservoir in North-East (Iranian coastal) is thicker from South-West direction. Therefore
the thickness of reservoir in North-east is higher from other side.
Sarvak, the target formation is lateral equivalent of Maudud, Ahamdi-Wara and RumaliaMishrif of Kuwait. It developed into two facies a massive limestone deposited in a neretic
environment containing Rudists Gastropods and Pelecypods, the other is deep water
limestone. The Kazhdomi formation as source rock could make a good hydrocarbon system.

71st EAGE Conference & Exhibition Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 8 - 11 June 2009

Figure 1 Left) Isopatch map. Right) similarity attribute of Mishrif surface and wells location.
Red color in left shows thinning and blue color show thickness of the formation.
The upper contact of Sarvak is marked by the erosional unconformity. The isopatch map of
Mishrif Figure1 displays the build up. Seismic cross section shows a buildup in middle
Figure2, the Saravk is thinner in direction of buildup and disappear in presence of
unconformity. At the Sarvak horizon, the spectral amplitude maps were generated around a 10
to 80 ms time window. Within this window the total spectral amplitude were extracted.

Figure 2 Seismic cross-section from Sarvak formation and above and under formation with
Gamma-ray log. Pink, green, yellow, red, blue and pink lines are top of Illam, Mishrif,
Ahmadi, Maudud, Kazhdomi and Burgan formation consequently. Red arrows indicate
suggestive system track in Mishrif member too.
After parameter test on horizon base attribute, we compare a brief of our result in Figure3.
The original RMS amplitude of 8ms above and 16ms below the interpreted Sarvak horizon 3a
and corresponding amplitude of 15Hz and 28Hz frequency shows the direct related of peak
spectral frequency in horizon slices.

Figure 3 The result of RMS amplitude of broad band horizon slice of upper Sarvak. Left)
thicker thickness event at the 7 Hz frequency horizon slice. Middle) the mid thickness the
15Hz frequency. Right) the thinner the 30 Hz amplitude of upper Sarvak.

71st EAGE Conference & Exhibition Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 8 - 11 June 2009

On the seismic cross section the result of CWT with Morelet wavelet shows a low resolution
results so in the reef boundary interpretation is not exact. The reason is could be relate to the
nature of Morlete wavelet in presence of sidelobs. Layer shows stronger amplitude strength in
thicker part of reef and weaker in higher frequency. There is existing well data id not enough
to calibrate the result. A 25 Hz seismic section of Figure4 obtained using CWT with Morlet
wavelet, method shows an anomaly pattern that shows it come from tuning effect of Mishrif
thinning over the old Sarvak basement.

Figure 4 Representation of spectral decomposition results in Sarvak formation. White, blue

and black arrows are representation spectral anomalies in base of Mishrif and pink and
brown arrows are representation spectral anomalies in base of Maudud.
After some test, FFT shows better resolution on cross sections where we interpreted the
possible reef. Figure5 is a comparison seismic data flatted on Ahamdi, in right, and the
attribute of peak amplitude of 10Hz in left. After this step the reinterpreted horizon for top of
reef were reinterpreted.

High
Amp.

Low
Amp.

High
Amp.

Low
Amp.

Figure 5 Up) a seismic section from upper Ssarvak (Mishrif) formation. Down) upper seismic
section flattened on Ahmadi (red line). Green and pink lines are top and base of upper Sarvak
(Mishrif) consequently and pink arrows representation baselap system (onlap).
Animating trough the frequency slices and using an adequate color bar we obtained around 10
Hz the best definition of the carbonated bodies (Figure6).
Figure 7 show the reef structure has shifted position toward east flank and the wells have been
drilling at bad locations as these wells have low oil production (High SW).

71st EAGE Conference & Exhibition Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 8 - 11 June 2009

High
Amp.

Low
Amp.

Figure 6 The figure of reef structure in timeslice with FFT method with frequency 10Hz in 3D view. Blue line is our old interpretation according to seismic data and green arrows are
reef location.

High
Amp.

High
Amp.

Low
Amp.

Low
Amp.

Figure 7 Two timeslice show FFT method results in frequency 10Hz as indicate reef
boundaries' (green arrows) in east and North-East directions with well locations (pink and
blue points) and fault plains at upper Sarvak (Mishrif) formation. Left) the timeslice 1368 ms.
Right) the timeslice 1380 ms white circle at center of reservoir is Ahmadi formation (base of
Mishrif).
Conclusions
Spectral decomposition study was performed on a data set that was originally processed for
structural interpretation. The method helps us to understand the distribution the reef boundary
much better than original seismic data. It proved to be efficient even in carbonated reservoirs
allowing individualize the geological bodies that were not easily defined in amplitude maps or
attributes depending of it.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Geophysics department of NIOC exploration directorate for permission to
publish this paper.
References
Castagna, J.P. and Sun, S. [2006] Comparison of spectral decomposition methods. First
Break, 24, 7579.
Castagna, J.P., Sun, S. and Siegfried, R.W. [2003] Instantaneous spectral analysis: Detection
of low-frequency shadows associated with hydrocarbons. The Leading Edge, 22, 120127.
Deng, J.X., Han, D.H., Liu, J. and Yao, Q. [2007] Application of spectral decomposition to
detect deepwater gas reservoir. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts.
Liu, J. and Marfurt, K.J. [2007] Instantaneous spectral attributes to detect channels.
Geophysics, 72(2), 2331.
Partyka, G., Gridley, J. and Lopez, J. [1999] Interpretational applications of spectral
decomposition in reservoir characterization. The Leading Edge, 18, 353360.

71st EAGE Conference & Exhibition Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 8 - 11 June 2009