Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ackerman
Socialist
Discourse
vs.
Capitalist
Practice
in
Ecuador:
The
Tension
Seen
Through
an
Immigration
Lens
The
paper
I
propose
to
present
is
the
result
of
fieldwork
I
carried
out
in
Ecuador
between
2010
and
2012
for
my
Masters
thesis,
and
focuses
on
the
current
tension
in
Ecuador
between
the
governments
discourse
based
on
twenty-first
century
socialism
and
contradictory
capitalist
practices
masked
by
this
discourse.
I
intend
to
locate
this
tension
specifically
in
the
field
of
Ecuadorian
immigration.
Ecuador
is
well-known
as
a
country
of
emigration,
especially
after
the
1999
dollarization
of
the
economy
and
ensuing
financial
crisis,
but
it
is
also
a
significant
receiving
country,
mostly
of
migrants
from
Colombia,
Peru,
and
the
U.S.
The
current
Ecuadorian
immigration
policy,
which
establishes
visa
categories
and
procedures,
dates
back
to
1971,
a
time
of
military
rule
in
the
countrys
history.
This
policy
eases
immigration
for
desirable
foreigners
who
contribute
to
the
strengthening
of
the
capitalist
economyinvestors,
businessmen,
and
real
estate
holdersas
well
as
spouses
of
Ecuadorian
men,
a
category
that
evidences
patriarchal
values
(the
woman
as
a
political
subject
as
she
relates
to
her
husband)while
making
undesired
immigration
more
difficult
for
those
who
do
not
contribute
to
the
strengthening
of
the
capitalist
system,
such
as
political
refugees
(mostly
Colombians)
and
economic
migrants
(mostly
Peruvians).
Partly
in
reaction
to
the
financial
crisis
of
1999
and
the
corrupt
neoliberal
rule
that
followed,
the
population
voted
in
2006
for
Alianza
Pas,
a
party
that
advocates
twenty-first
century
socialism.
In
2008,
a
new
Constitution
was
ratified
in
which
an
article
declares
the
end
of
the
concept
of
the
foreigner
and
introduces
the
concept
of
universal
citizenship.
Despite
this
utopian
socialist
discourse
in
the
states
magna
carta,
an
immigration
policy
based
on
exploitative
and
patriarchal
ideals
remains
in
force
today,
influencing
different
foreigners
experiences
of
the
immigration
process
in
vastly
different
ways.
Thus,
I
argue
in
my
paper
that
socialist
discourse
in
Ecuador
appeases
the
electorate
while
allowing
old
asymmetrical
models
to
continue
operating
with
little
debate
or
denouncement."
Nilufer
Akalin
Dispossessed
immigrants:
The
reproduction
of
racialization
in
the
times
of
austerity
measures
In
the
last
decade,
major
social,
economic
and
political
developments
in
the
South
European
countries
have
brought
migration
on
to
the
centre
stage
in
political
discourse
with
a
rise
of
racist
and
xenophobic
discourses
against
migrants.
The
social,
political
stand
and
attitudes
toward
the
excluded
body
(immigrant)
had
started
to
be
articulated
through
the
demolishment
of
the
subject
in
the
era
of
the
symbolic
demolishment
of
the
human
body
under
serious
conditions
of
living
in
financial
crisis.
This
paper
seeks
to
make
a
contribution
to
this
line
of
research
on
how
the
social
conflicts
of
the
industrial
world
are
translated
in
racial
terms
just
as
the
financial
crisis
and
the
existence
of
Neo-Nazi
party
in
Greece
was
becoming
the
manner
to
divide,
rank
human
beings
by
reference
to
selected
embodies
properties
to
subordinate,
exclude,
and
exploit
them.
Regarding
the
current
political
and
economic
situation,
some
material
trajectory
can
be
traced
through
racialization
and
racism
that
are
being
implied
in
Greek
society.
This
research
paper
focuses,
as
a
case
study,
on
the
understanding
of
how
inequality
is
structured
and
reproduced
under
global
capitalism,
addressing
the
patterns
of
behavior,
organizational
outcomes,
state
policies,
practices
and
articulations
of
ethnoracial
inequality
and
control.
This
paper
also
aims
to
demonstrate
to
what
extent
the
austerity
measures
produce
a
new
form
of
racialization.
Therefore,
it
situates
the
relationship
of
immigrants,
the
state
and
Golden
Dawn
at
the
central
axes
to
understand
why
and
how
the
austerity
measures
produce
racialization.
Barbara
Allen
Alexander
Shlyapnikov
under
Arrest,
1935-7
Alexander
Shlyapnikov,
an
Old
Bolshevik
and
leader
of
the
Workers'
Opposition
in
the
Russian
Communist
Party
from
1919
to
1921,
was
arrested
by
the
NKVD
in
January
1935,
as
were
many
other
former
oppositionists
in
the
wake
of
the
Kirov
murder.
Interrogated
in
1935-6,
he
was
tried
and
executed
in
1937.
Charges
escalated
from
counterrevolutionary
activity
and
anti-Soviet
agitation
to
terrorism
and
conspiracy
to
assassinate
Stalin.
Shlyapnikov
contested
the
charges
and
refused
to
implicate
others.
The
interrogation
protocols
and
his
written
statements
attached
to
the
protocols
reflect
his
struggle
to
reveal
the
absurdity
of
the
charges
against
him
and
to
preserve
his
own
sense
of
identity
as
a
revolutionary.
At
his
closed
trial
by
the
military
collegium
of
the
USSR
Supreme
Court
in
September
1937,
he
denied
all
the
charges
against
him
and
confessed
that
he
was
only
guilty
of
having
had
a
liberal
attitude
toward
those
persons
around
him.
His
behavior
differed
significantly
from
that
of
other
Old
Bolsheviks
such
as
Zinoviev
and
Kamenev,
who
confessed
in
public
trial,
supposedly
for
the
benefit
of
the
party.
He
asserted
that
his
confession
to
outlandish
charges
would
not
serve
the
partys
interests.
Riya
Mary
Al'Sanah
The
struggle
for
democracy
in
the
Tunisian
revolution
Tunisia
has
been
held
up
by
the
international
community
as
the
prime
example
of
a
country
succeeding
in
a
democratic
transition
process
in
contrast
to
Egypt,
Syria
or
Libya:
it
is
politically
stable,
it
has
adopted
a
new
constitution
praised
by
the
international
community,
it
has
carried
out
transparent
elections,
and
it
has
signed
a
loan
agreement
with
the
International
Monetary
Fund.
However,
the
reality
in
Tunisia
is
much
more
complicated.
The
Tunisian
bourgeoisie
and
remnants
of
the
Ben
Ali
regime
are
reasserting
themselves
through
increased
repression
against
political
decent
and
growing
calls
against
industrial
action
and
for
a
social
truce.
This
paper
will
look
at
democratic
forms,
as
promoted
from
above
by
the
Tunisian
elite
and
international
organisations
and
contrast
them
with
revolutionary
democratic
structures
developed
from
below.
We
will
discuss
the
substance
and
nature
of
the
democratic
transition
taking
place
in
Tunisia
today.
Furthermore,
we
will
address
whether
the
democratic
structures
developed
by
the
revolutionary
movement
can
offer
an
alternative
to
the
promoted
model
of
neoliberal
democracy."
Valentina
Alvarez
Experience
of
domestic
work
in
Chile:
social
reproduction
an
identity
construction
of
the
working
classes
During
the
1970
decade,
the
Domestic
Labour
Debate
reflected
about
the
relevance
of
domestic
labour
to
capitalism
in
order
to
unveil
the
particular
place
of
women
into
class
struggle.
Despite
differences
among
DLD
theorist,
they
all
agreed
that,
through
producing
a
docile
workforce
or
maintaining
a
reserve
army
of
labour
-to
put
some
examples-,
capitalism
was
the
main
beneficiary
of
womens
domestic
labour.
Therefore,
they
thought,
revolutionary
practices
can
only
be
deployed
when
domestic
labour
is
rejected,
socialized
or
done
while
its
bearers
women-
engage
in
proletarian
struggles.
Some
years
before
that
debate,
domestic
work
and
childcare
experiences
of
Chilean
women
from
popular
sectors
in
1970
questioned
such
statements.
They
showed
how
reproductive
labour
did
not
only
benefit
capitalism.
Working
class
women
were
producing
in
daily
basis
a
sense
of
dignity
for
their
families
that
invested
them
with
authority
for
their
struggle.
However,
they
did
so
by
reproducing
traditional
gender
roles.
In
that
vein,
I
argue
that
is
necessary
to
enquiry
domestic
work
beyond
the
economic
reductionism
of
DLD
to
understand
its
multiple
dimensions.
To
account
for
particular
experiences
and
the
meanings
attached
to
them
can
shed
light
in
that
direction.
Leandro
BeatrizAlves
Moments
of
danger,
moments
of
opportunity:
Trade
unions
and
climate
change
That
trade
unions
(TUs)
are
fading
away
is
widely
accepted.
Explanations
for
this
draw
on
broader
societal
processes,
e.g.
the
reduction
of
manufacturing
in
industrialised
countries,
where
TUs
were
strongest,
the
increase
of
the
service
and
IT
sector,
where
they
have
less
experience
in
organising,
and
the
casualisation
of
employments.
Paradoxically,
individualisation
processes
occur
in
a
situation
where
the
needs
of
a
collective
and
global
response
to
global
crises
(financial,
food,
ecological)
are
acute.
In
the
case
of
TUs
this
is
especially
true
against
the
background
of
globalisation,
which
strengthens
the
power
of
Transnational
Corporations
to
relocate
production
and
dictate
the
working
conditions
in
the
Global
South
as
well
as
in
the
Global
North
and
to
set
workers
in
competition
to
each
other
(Chan/Ross
2003,
Cowie,
2001).
TUs
are
the
only
kinds
of
organisations
that
are
present
in
virtually
every
country
around
the
globe
(The
ITUC
represents
175
million
workers
in
155
countries
and
territories
and
has
311
national
affiliates.).
Thus,
potentially
they
are
the
only
force
to
challenge
the
power
of
TNCs.
In
reality,
though,
they
are
struggling
with
structural
transformations
including
the
diversification
of
the
workforce
in
terms
of
feminisation
and
ethnic
diversity
(Schierup
et.
al.
2006,
Ward
1990,
Mulinari/Neergaard
2003).
Furthermore,
new
international
bodies
and
the
political
recognition
of
climate
change
have
exerted
pressures
on
unions
to
re-formulate
their
policies
(Hyman/Ferner
1994).
The
overdetermination
of
these
processes
constitutes
a
transitional
phase
where
social
actors
have
to
reconsider
the
parameters
of
their
actions.
Unions
have
to
simultaneously
reassure
their
traditional
membership,
recruit
new
members,
cooperate
with
other
social
movements
as
well
as
global
organisations
(e.g.,
World
Bank,
IMF),
act
on
a
global
level
but
remain
rooted
at
the
local,
and
accommodate
new
issues
like
climate
change
and
North-South
divide.
In
other
words,
unions
are
living
what
Walter
Benjamin
has
called
moments
of
danger.
In
contrast
to
the
notion
of
crisis
Benjamins
term
denotes
not
only
the
threat
of
disintegration
but
also
the
threat
of
conformism
that
is
about
to
overpower
tradition
(Benjamin
1974).
Selected
Unions:
1.
The
metal
workers
unions
are
arguably
the
best
organised
and
largest
world-wide
and
are
also
those
facing
the
greatest
challenges
from
climate
change
policies,
relocation
of
production
from
the
North
to
the
South,
and
redundancies
due
to
technological
innovation.
Their
international
(IMF),
regional
(EMF),
and
national
branches
in
the
selected
countries
will
constituted
one
of
the
two
major
case
studies
of
our
study.
The
metal
sector
in
most
countries
of
the
European
Union
has
a
comparatively
high
percentage
of
migrant
workers,
which
will
make
it
possible
to
investigate
whether
these
workers
are
having
an
important
role
in
shaping
new
union
policies.
2.
About
one
third
of
the
worlds
workers
are
employed
in
the
agricultural
sector.
Agriculture
is
integrated
into
the
issues
of
climate
change
and
the
North-South
divide:
On
the
one
hand
it
is
the
sector
most
hardly
hit
by
the
effect
of
climate
change,
while
at
the
same
time,
it
produces
significant
effects
on
climate
change.
It
also
plays
a
significant
role
in
the
North-South
relationships,
since
predominantly
Northern
companies
are
responsible
for
the
advancement
of
agribusiness
threatening
farming
on
small
scale
in
countries
of
the
South.
The
IUF
and
other
unions
of
food
workers
are
forming
alliances
with
non-union
associations
like
Via
Campesina
to
address
these
conflicts.
As
opposed
to
the
metal
sector
where
the
majority
of
workers
are
men,
about
70%
of
the
agricultural
workers
are
women.
Thus
a
combined
study
of
these
two
sectors
will
allow
us
to
better
compare
the
influence
of
gender
relations
on
new
union
policies.
The
selected
countries:
The
core
of
our
investigation
is
in
Europe
looking
at
the
national
and
local
unions
in
the
metal
and
agricultural
sector:
Sweden,
UK
and
Spain.
Unions
in
all
these
countries
have
made
huge
efforts
to
integrate
climate
change
issues
into
their
policies
and
to
engage
with
environmental
organisations,
whereby
Spanish
unions
seem
most
advanced.
In
order
to
gain
a
broader
insight
into
different
regimes
of
countries
of
the
South
we
have
chosen
Brazil,
South
Africa
and
India.
All
three
countries
are
integrated
into
the
global
economy,
while
having
different
trade
union
histories.
We
have
conducted
an
average
of
20
in-depth
life-histories
interviews
(per
country)
with
union
officials
responsible
for
the
departments
of
Environment
and/or
International
Relations
and
members
of
rural
organisations
(such
as
MST
Landless
Workers
Movement
and
MMC
Rural
Women
Movement
from
Brazil)
and
rural
unions.
We
aim
to
present
our
findings
at
the
Eleventh
Annual
Conference.
Maurice
Andreu
Did
the
leadership
of
the
Communist
International
believe
that
capitalism
could
not
survive?
The
leadership
of
the
Communist
International
thought
certainly
that
its
revolutionary
action
should
put
capitalism
to
its
end.
This
historical
confidence
had
an
economic
and
political
basis:
the
world
war
crisis
of
1914
revealed
all
the
limits
of
capitalism
and
created
the
conditions
of
its
reversal.
The
CI,
almost
always,
explained
its
failure
by
the
mistakes
and
the
weakness
of
the
revolutionaries,
not
by
capitalist
ability
to
rise
again
from
its
ashes.
My
paper
will
confirm
that
the
leadership
of
the
Comintern
believed
that
capitalism
would
be
soon
dead
But
there
is
sometimes
a
kind
of
ambiguity.
I
shall
speak
of
two
cases:
Lenin,
in
1921,
when
the
CI
takes
the
turn
of
United
Front
and
Bukharin,
in
1928,
when
the
words
general
crisis
of
capitalism
are
introduced
in
the
Program
of
the
Comintern.
Thanos
Andritsos
In
search
of
unity:
From
the
multiple
geographies
of
resistance
to
the
common
place
of
a
renewed
class
project.
Greece,
from
2009
onwards,
became
the
epicenter
of
the
global
financial
crisis.
In
this
period
very
intense
social
struggles
took
place.
Many
studies
for
the
so
called
greek
resistance
seem
to
focus
on
highlighting
unilaterally
only
certain
aspects
(such
as
the
mobilization
in
the
squares
of
aganaktismenoi,
experiments
of
self-organization
and
social
solidarity,
local
and
environmental
struggles,
workers'
strikes,
the
electoral
rise
of
the
left,
etc.)
and
lack
in
an
overall
picture
and
perspective.
The
current
paper
understands
all
the
major
battles
as
moments
in
the
evolution
of
the
power
relations
and
the
class
struggle
inside
the
Greek
society.
Our
main
goals
are
a)
to
map
the
current
social
movements
geographies
and
b)
to
highlight
the
issue
of
unification
of
all
the
struggles
under
a
common
anti-systemic
context.
In
this
order,
we
can
trace
three
processes
of
unifying:
1.
Unifying
as
a
demand
of
the
movements:
An
""internal""
process
coming
from
the
development,
the
discourse
and
the
political
practices
of
the
movements.
2.
Unifying
as
a
consequence
of
dominant
politics:
An
""external""
process
coming
primarily
from
the
governments
practice
to
target
every
single
popular
mobilization
as
unified
threat.
3.
Unifying
as
a
common
radical
theoretical
resultant.
A
current
attempt
in
the
radical
theorys
discourse
to
search
for
a
unified
political
subject.
Taking
into
account
these
processes,
the
paper
seeks
for
the
preconditions
for
a
shift
from
the
multiple
geographies
of
resistance
to
a
common
place
of
the
renewed
class
project."
Ricardo
Antunes
The
International
Working
Class
150
Years
After
and
its
Challenges
Today
The
International
Workingmen's
Association
(IWA)
was
born
in
London
on
September
28,
1864
with
the
essential
principle:
the
emancipation
of
the
working
classes
must
be
conquered
by
the
working
classes
themselves.
What
does
it
mean
to
think
of
an
international
organization
of
the
working
class
today?
Given
the
globalized
shape
of
capitalism,
has
it
not
become
even
more
urgent
to
create
a
new
project
of
international
working-class
organization?
In
order
to
explore
these
crucial
questions,
we
must
initially
try
to
understand
the
new
morphology
of
labor
and
some
of
its
principal
tendencies.
Stable
work
is
being
replaced
by
atypical
labour.
How
is
it
possible
to
organize
this
new
proletariat?
How
can
this
growing
sector
of
the
working
class
advance
toward
class
consciousness,
under
conditions
of
the
transnationalization
of
capital?
How
can
it
link
up
with
the
more
traditional
sectors
of
the
working
class?
Just
as
capital
is
a
global
system,
the
world
of
labor
and
its
challenges
are
also
increasingly
transnationalized.
Given
that
the
destructive
logic
of
capital
is
seemingly
multiple
but
in
essence
unitary,
if
these
vital
poles
of
labor
dont
ally
themselves
organically,
they
will
suffer
the
tragedy
of
greater
precarization.
If,
on
the
other
hand,
they
forge
ties
of
solidarity,
defining
and
planning
their
actions,
they
may
have
greater
power
than
any
other
social
force
to
demolish
the
capital
system
and
thereby
begin
delineating
a
new
way
of
life."
Stephen
Ashe
Whatever
happened
to
the
labour
movement?
A
Gramscian
analysis
of
the
electoral
rise
and
fall
of
the
British
National
Party
In
Whatever
happened
to
the
Labour
Movement?
Thomas
Linehan
provided
a
historical
analysis
of
support
for
the
British
Union
of
Fascists,
the
National
Front
and
the
British
National
Party,
as
well
as
the
role
that
the
labour
movement
has
played
in
preventing
such
parties
from
making
greater
political
inroads
in
working
class
areas
during
the
1930s
and
the
1970s.
For
Linehan,
the
emergence
of
the
British
National
Party
in
2002
can
be
put
down
to
a
unique
combination
of
structural,
political
and
ideological
factors.
In
particular,
Linehan
emphasises
the
weakening
of
the
traditional
tripartite
alliance
between
the
working
class,
the
Labour
party
and
the
trade
union
movement.
This
paper
will
test
Linehans
thesis
by
exploring
the
electoral
rise
and
fall
of
the
BNP
in
Barking
and
Dagenham
between
2004
and
2010.
This
paper
will
argue
that
a
richer,
deeper
analysis
of
the
BNPs
electoral
breakthrough
and
subsequent
demise
can
be
gained
by
drawing
upon
Antonio
Gramscis
carceral
writings
on
hegemony
(Gramsci,
1971),
and
in
particular
by
developing
a
wider
analyses
of
the
relationship
between
the
local
state
and
civil
society.
Abigail
Bakan
Global
capitalism
has
proven
to
be
tenaciously
resilient,
manifest
not
only
in
its
continuing
exploitation,
but
also
in
processes
of
gender
and
racial
oppression.
While
the
linkages
among
gendered
and
racialized
oppression,
and
class
exploitation,
have
been
the
focus
of
some
Marxist
feminist
theorists
(Himani
Bannerji,
Angela
Davis,
Collette
Guillaumin),
it
is
American
legal
feminist
theorist
Kimberl
Crenshaw
who
has
helpfully
coined
the
term
intersectionality,
applied
primarily
to
the
US
context.
This
increasingly
influential
concept
has
significantly
broadened
the
potential
ground
on
which
to
link
anti-racist
feminism
with
Marxist
theory.
Scant
attention,
however,
has
specifically
addressed
the
contributions
of
indigenous
feminism,
though
formative
in
anti-racist
theory
and
practice
in
North
America.
This
lacuna
is
evidenced
in
both
intersectional
feminist
and
Marxist
feminist
scholarship.
However,
Marxs
interest
in
indigenous
societies
not
least
gender
relations
in
indigenous
societies
was
significant
(Ethnological
Notebooks,
1880-82),
and
considerably
influenced
Engels
Origin
of
the
Family,
Private
Property
and
the
State.
This
paper
(i)
theorizes
the
significance
of
attention
to
indigenous
feminist
contributions
regarding
intersectional
feminist
and
Marxist
feminist
conversations;
and
(ii)
attends
to
the
specific
tenacity
of
the
North
American
states
as
case
studies,
exemplifying
such
theorization.
I
suggest
that
Marxist
understandings
of
the
gendered
and
racialized
experiences
of
imperialism,
social
reproduction,
and
anti-colonial
resistance,
can
be
considerably
advanced
through
an
engagement
with
the
contributions
of
indigenous
feminism.
Laurent
Baronian
I
propose
to
present
issues
of
my
book
"Marx
and
living
labour"
(Routledge,
2013)
related
to
the
question:
How
capitalism
survives?
The
basic
idea
linking
all
the
chapters
together
is
that
Marx,
from
his
early
economic
works,
conceived
the
labour
of
any
kind
of
society
as
a
set
of
production
activities
and
analysed
the
historical
modes
of
production
as
specific
ways
of
distributing
and
exchanging
these
activities.
On
the
contrary,
political
economy
considers
the
labour
only
under
the
form
of
its
product,
and
the
exchange
of
products
as
commodities
as
the
unique
form
of
social
labour
exchange.
For
Marx,
insofar
as
the
labour
creating
value
represents
a
specific
mode
of
exchanging
the
society's
living
labour,
general
and
abstract
labour
cannot
not
only
be
defined
as
the
substance
or
measure
unit
of
the
commodity,
as
in
Smith
or
Ricardo,
but
foremost
as
an
expense
of
living
labour,
i.e.
of
nerves,
muscles,
brain,
etc.
Hence
the
twofold
nature
of
living
labour,
as
a
concrete
activity
producing
a
use
value
and
an
expense
of
human
labour
in
general
producing
exchange
value.
Marx
himself
claimed
that
this
twofold
nature
of
labour
creating
value
was
its
main
and
most
important
contribution
to
economic
science.
This
book
aims
at
showing
how
both
determines
the
original
categories
and
economic
laws
in
Capital
and
constitutes
the
profound
innerspring
of
Marx's
critique
of
political
economy.
The
role
and
function
of
living
labour
is
highlighted
by
showing
how,
on
the
one
hand,
the
opposition
between
living
and
dead
labour
is
at
the
origin
of
the
deepest
contradictions
of
the
capitalist
mode
of
production,
whereas
on
the
other
hand
capitalism
survives,
i.e.
overcomes
its
contradictions
and
pushes
its
own
limits,
only
be
appropriating
more
extensively
and
intensively
the
social
productive
forces
created
by
the
living
labour
of
individual
producers
developing
cooperation
links.
The
contradictions
based
on
opposition
between
living
and
dead
labour
suggest
a
Marxian
interpretation
of
the
current
crisis
which
must
be
distinguished
from
underconsumption
and
stagnation
theories
of
crises.
Emmanuel
Barot
This
year
marks
the
50th
birthday
of
"One-Dimensional
Man"
:
what
remains
of
our
Marcusian
lovings
?
Marked
by
so-called
pessimism,
exalting
the
"Great
Refusal"
of
outsiders,
and
lamenting
the
integration
of
the
proletariat
to
capital,
Marcuse
ushered
in
the
era
of
post-proletarian
multitudes
and
supposedly
at
this
time
gave
up
Marxism,
turned
to
revisionism
and
fell
into
an
anarcho-leftist
romantic
utopism.
Is
this
statement
really
valid
?
Actually
he
kept
the
idea
that
capitalism
was
not
able
to
digest
any
form
of
struggle,
an
heterodox
but
close
relationship
to
Marxism,
and
maintained
the
strategic
question
of
how
organize
the
class
struggle
facing
an
ultra-violent
late
capitalism.
What
lessons
are
to
be
learned
from
these
dialectical
ambivalences
?
Pritish
Behuria
Balancing
Violence
and
Ideas:
Historical
Strategies
of
Elite
Capital
Accumulation
in
Rwanda
Strategies
of
Primitive
Accumulation
in
Rwanda
have
traditionally
been
organized
around
primary
commodities
-
particularly
coffee.
Rwanda's
own
'natural
economy'
was
complicated
by
its
colonial
history
and
the
introduction
of
cash
crop
production
in
this
respect.
Immediately,
the
ethnic/class
heirarchy
prevalent
in
the
country
became
an
arena
of
competition
around
the
capacity
to
push
farmers
to
grow
increasing
coffee.
Chiefs,
at
this
time,
were
rewarded
on
the
basis
of
their
capacity
to
organize
labour
in
this
respect
through
coercion
and
creating
collective
identities.
As
the
country
became
independent,
the
heirarchy
was
further
altered,
as
traditional
'class'
divisions
became
'ethnic'
divisions
in
order
to
collectivize
violence
and
incite
revolution.
The
first
two
governments
continued
the
same
strategy
of
accumulation
and
managed
their
elites
through
the
distribution
of
rents
in
these
sectors.
Crucially,
coffee
became
part
of
the
national
effort
and
became
bound
on
ideas
of
'economic
nationalism'.
This
was
also
woven
in
the
fabric
of
ethnic
opposition
against
traditional
Tutsi
leadership.
The
Post-Genocide
Government
has
attempted
to
break
away
from
traditional
class
dynamics
around
primary
commodity
specialization.
It
has
served
to
both
disperse
elites
and
labour
to
different
sectors,
thus
reducing
the
capacity
for
resistance
from
below
and
within
the
elite
bargain
in
the
country.
The
destructive
forces
of
capitalism
have
accompanied
economic
development
in
the
country
and
the
central
governing
apparatus
legitimizes
itself
on
the
basis
of
violence,
rather
than
the
force
of
a
'national
effort'
in
the
same
way
as
its
predecessors.
This
paper
will
study
strategies
of
elite
capital
accumulation
that
have
taken
place
historically
in
Rwanda,
contrasting
the
balancing
of
violence
and
ideas
in
managing
resistance
from
its
elites,
as
well
as
'from
below'."
Riccardo
Bellofiore
Which
crisis,
which
capitalism?
Marxian
political
economy
and
Financial
Keynesianism.
This
paper
presents
an
analysis
of
the
crisis
combining
a
Marxian
and
a
Financial
Keynesian
perspective.
Both
are
framed
in
a
long-run
perspective
of
the
capitalist
dynamics.
The
tendency
of
the
rate
of
profit
to
fall
has
to
be
interpreted
as
affirmed
to
the
countertendencies
winning
over
the
tendency,
and
through
the
change
in
the
forms
of
capitalisms.
Neither
the
classical
versions
of
the
fall
of
the
rate
of
profit
or
an
underconsumptionist
view
are
tenable;
the
same
can
be
said
against
the
traditional
post-
Keynesian
analyses
of
the
crisis.
Each
crisis
erupts
because
of
the
contradictions
in
the
idiosyncratic
factors
explaining
the
ascent.
We
are
experiencing
the
crisis
not
of
a
generic
Neoliberalism
or
a
void
financialisation,
but
of
a
money
manager
capitalism,
which
was
built
upon
a
concentration
without
centralisation
of
capital,
new
forms
of
corporate
governance,
aggressive
competition,
a
capital
market
inflation,
indebted
consumption.
A
world
able
to
gain
in
new
forms
the
same
good
(or
rather,
bad)
old
exploitation,
to
provide
internally
demand,
and
to
present
itself
as
a
stable
Great
Moderation.
The
paper
will
show
how
this
constituted
a
financially
privatised
Keynesianism,
based
on
a
new
monetary
policy
and
a
new
autonomous
demand
driving
the
process,
a
configuration
which
was
necessarily
unsustainable.
The
paper
will
show
how
the
crisis
evolved
from
a
Great
Recession
to
a
Lesser
Depression,
looking
at
the
specificities
of
the
European
crisis,
which
(like
the
global
crisis)
is
not
due
to
trade
imbalances,
nor
to
government
public
deficits,
even
not
the
euro
in
itself."
Bernhard
H.
Bayerlein
This
paper
seeks
to
outline
an
approach
to
oppression
in
the
abstract.
The
aim
is
to
set
the
various
Marxist
theories
of
concrete
oppressions
on
a
rigorous
conceptual
foundation
a
necessary
step
if
notions
of
intersectionality
etc
are
ever
to
move
beyond
empirical
description.
It
ends
by
indicating
how,
if
abstract
oppression
is
the
""superstructure"",
then
social
reproduction
is
the
""base"".
By
understanding
oppression
abstractly
we
gain
a
better
grasp
of
how
the
are
undergirded
and
perpetuated
by
political
economy:
the
replenishment
of
labour
power
through
childrearing
and
immigration
is
intimately
linked
to
sexism
and
racism
respectively.
This
approach
can
lay
the
foundation
""grand
unified
theory""
of
exploitation
and
oppression
that
can
act
as
a
framework
for
understanding
all
these
phenomena
as
a
totality."
Ian
Birchall
1914
was
a
major
victory
for
the
capitalist
order.
A
growing
European
socialist
movement
was,
in
Trotskys
words,
so
reduced
that
at
Zimmerwald
it
was
possible
to
seat
all
the
internationalists
in
four
coaches.
As
Michael
Goves
recent
elucubrations
show,
it
is
still
a
site
of
ideological
contest.
Lazy
clichs,
like
nation
overrides
class
or
Second
International
Marxism
are
inadequate
to
offer
an
explanation.
Alfred
Rosmers
uncompleted
Le
Mouvement
ouvrier
pendant
la
guerre
(2
vols,
1936,
1959)
makes
a
valuable
contribution
to
our
understanding.
Rosmer
combines
the
memoirs
of
an
anti-war
activist
with
archival
research,
and
draws
on
Georges
Dumoulins
fascinating
pamphlet
Les
Syndicalists
franais
pendant
la
guerre
(1918).
Trotsky
rightly
urged
that
every
serious
proletarian
revolutionary
ought
to
read
-
more
exactly,
to
study
-
Rosmers
book.
Rosmer
came
from
the
syndicalist
tradition,
but
recognised
that
syndicalism
was
part
of
the
problem;
he
was
an
independent
thinker
who
did
not
endorse
Lenins
strategy
of
revolutionary
defeatism.
Rosmers
stated
aim
was
to
recall
what
happened
yesterday,
to
relate
the
facts,
to
show
their
interconnection,
and
to
draw
out
their
meaning;
the
lesson
must
then
be
so
clear
that
it
will
provide
the
reply
to
the
agonising
questions
of
the
present.
David
Black
David
Black
suggests
that
Marx's
exposition
of
the
fetishism
of
commodities
is
historically-
specific
to
capitalist
production,
and
therefore
cannot
explain
the
origins
of
philosophy,
which
Black
shows
to
have
involved
various
historical
developments
in
Greek
society
and
culture
as
well
as
monetization.
Just
as
Hegel's
critique
of
Kantian
formalism
informs
Marx's
critique
of
capital,
Hegel's
writings
on
how
the
proper
organization
of
labor
might
abolish
the
barrier
Aristotle
put
between
production
and
the
""Realm
of
Freedom""
prefigure
Marx's
efforts
to
formulate
of
an
alternative
to
capitalism.
Paul
Blackledge
This
paper
begins
with
the
story
of
eugenicist
feminism,
pointing
to
the
entangled
genealogies
of
biopolitical
governance,
racism
and
twentieth
century
European
and
North
American
feminist
politics.
It
goes
on
to
question
the
'assertion
of
contingency'
as
a
tactic
in
undermining
biopolitical
knowledges
and
investments
-
suggesting
that
such
assertions
have
acted
to
mask,
rather
than
to
dislodge,
biopolitical
racism
within
feminist
politics
as
elsewhere.
Contingency,
development
and
progress
are
technologies
of
attachment
that
invest
feminist
agency
in
biopolitical
life
(and
so
economies
of
endless
growth
and
expansion).
These
investments
persist
in
contemporary
landscapes
in
which
race,
population
and
growth
are
understood
as
aspects
of
culture,
religion
and
education
more
than
biology.
The
paper
highlights
the
dangers
of
denying
and
denouncing,
rather
than
attending
to,
our
own
investments
in
despicable
politics.
It
calls
for
'generous
methods'
(M'charek)
in
the
study
of
feminist
racism.
Mark
Blum
Max Adler's social theory: a foundation for more effective interpersonal cooperation
The
Austro-Marxist
Max
Adlers
theoretical
career
included
the
development
of
a
concept
of
societal
socialization
which
was
not
fully
appreciated
by
his
peers,
nor
consequently
by
posterity.
Only
his
student,
and
later
prominent
Marxist
Lucien
Goldmann
,
comprehended
the
full
implications
of
his
concept
of
what
might
be
called
micro-sociological
socialization
[Vergesellschaftung].
Adlers
conceptual
turn
stresses
that
every
society
has
its
own
manner
of
organizing
an
interdependence
insofar
as
each
develops
structures
that
must
fulfill
the
cognitive
imperative
of
a
practical
vision
of
the
totality
of
its
participants.
Past
forms
failed
in
their
governing
hegemonies
to
realize
the
equality
and
interpersonal
depth
of
cooperation
that
socialism
could
effect.
Max
Adlers
understanding
of
interpersonal
relations,
while
preceding
even
the
group
dynamics
movement
that
emerged
in
the
1920s
and
1930s
(Moreno,
Lewin),
insisted
on
not
only
a
more
refined
knowledge
of
the
dynamics
of
human
cooperation,
but
a
clear
understanding
of
the
institutional
problems
that
could
obstruct
knowledgeable
interaction.
Lucien
Goldmann
wrestled
with
this
problem
of
interpersonal
understanding
in
the
1950s.
As
Max
Adler
and
to
a
degree
Otto
Bauer,
Goldmann
knew
that
only
by
a
more
public
recognition
of
how
the
norms
of
collective
cooperation
were
distorted
within
societal
institutions
in
a
capitalist
culture
could
effective
socialization
be
realized.
Training
in
cooperative
empathy
finally
had
to
meet
the
wall
of
normative
praxis
in
the
everyday
world.
Max
Adler
understood
that
every
human
culture
over
time
has
its
own
manner
of
structuring
cooperative
association
[vergesellschaften]
.
Each
manner
of
organization
generates
values
that
justifies
its
praxis.
But,
a
socialized
society
required
a
discerning
interdependent
depth
of
knowing
into
how
human
cooperation
occurs
or
founders.
The
functional
democracy
which
the
Austro-Marxists
strove
for,
that
is
the
interdependent
equality
of
all
participants
in
any
societal
effort,
required
a
new
address
of
how
cooperation
could
actually
be
realized.
The
works
councils
were
a
functioal
address
of
this
democratic
socialization,
but
even
they
often
foundered
because
of
the
lack
of
insight
into
an
effective
association
of
differing
persons,
skills,
and
temperaments.
Socialization
today
still
suffers
under
the
lack
of
micro-sociological
discernment
of
association
as
it
is
practiced
in
societal
institutions,
and,
without
further
development
of
the
group
dynamic
understanding
of
its
praxis
in
everyday
efforts
of
cooperative
activity,
a
socialization
from
the
top
downby
mandateonly
reproduces
how
cooperation
has
occurred
within
the
historical
norms
of
capitalist
and
pre-capitalist
societies.
Flix
Boggio
&
Stella
Magliani-Belkacem
Lastly,
we
want
to
emphasize
how
democratic
demands
may
provide
today
a
fertile
ground
for
a
left
strategy:
first
as
a
way
to
bridge
the
gap
with
non-white
communities
in
resistance,
secondly
because
social
and
economic
struggles
cannot
succeed
without
attacking
the
authoritarian
character
of
neoliberal
institutions,
thirdly
because
democracy
lays
the
foundations
of
a
non-nationalist
narrative
for
a
people's
unity
in
the
struggle
for
hegemony.
Patrick
Bond,
Ama
Biney
and
Castro
Ngobese
South
Africas
Elite
Transition:
looking
backward
and
forward
South
Africa's
twenty-year
elite
transition
-
from
racial
apartheid
to
neoliberalism,
in
the
process
amplifying
unemployment,
inequality
and
ecological
destruction
-
follows
patterns
witnessed
in
many
other
neo-colonial
African
regime
changes
dating
to
the
late
1950s.
However,
there
are
several
political
initiatives
from
the
left
which
hold
promise,
including
the
breakaway
by
the
largest
trade
union
from
its
alliance
with
the
ruling
party.
This
discussion
about
past,
present
and
future
features
one
of
the
transition's
leading
political
economists
(Patrick
Bond),
the
former
editor
of
the
Pambazuka
African
ezine
(Ama
Biney)
and
the
spokesperson
of
the
National
Union
of
Metalworkers
of
South
Africa
(Castro
Ngobese).
Mathieu
Bonzom
How
immigration
control
survives
in
the
US:
the
current
immigration
regime,
hegemony
and
strategy
This
paper
is
an
analysis
of
immigration
control
in
the
US
today,
in
terms
of
hegemony.
Laws,
enforcement
policies,
and
debates
surrounding
them,
have
been
shaped
by
successive
administrations
and
legislatures
so
as
to
combine
various
sets
of
political
demands,
mainly
those
of
big
business
owners,
opponents
of
mass
immigration,
and
immigrants
themselves.
In
a
logic
akin
to
that
of
the
historic
bloc,
this
generates
power
by
assembling
demands
that
are
not
immediately
and
fully
compatible.
The
stability
of
such
an
immigration
regime
can
only
be
maintained
by
a
political
process
implementing
numerous
ad
hoc
reforms.
Hence,
only
some
of
the
many
government
interventions,
such
as
the
1986
Immigration
Reform
and
Control
Act
(IRCA),
rework
all
dimensions
of
this
overarching
regime:
anti-immigration
measures
and
a
mass
legalization
plan.
The
limited
character
of
each
set
of
policies
(or
their
enforcement)
allows
for
the
reproduction
of
a
subaltern
population
of
immigrants.
The
IRCA
illustrates
the
general
goals
of
the
immigration
regime:
satisfying
employers'
demands
in
the
best
possible
way,
by
harnessing
and
reproducing
both
anti-immigrant
sentiment
and
immigrant
consent
to
contingent
statuses
(this
reproduction
is
ensured
by
simultaneously
rewarding
those
impulses
and
preventing
their
full
satisfaction).
While
focusing
on
immigration
in
the
neoliberal
era,
it
will
be
possible
to
show
elements
of
synchronic
and
diachronic
continuity,
with
race
relations
more
generally,
and
with
the
treatment
of
immigrant
and
racial
minorities
in
a
less
recent
past.
The
hegemonic
dynamic
makes
it
difficult
for
immigrant
movements
to
come
up
with
a
strategy
that
does
not
end
up
allowing,
or
indeed
contributing
to,
the
perpetuation
and
relaunching
of
the
regime.
At
the
same
time,
the
reproduction
of
immigrant
consent
can
cut
both
ways:
when
it
is
fragilized
by
political
circumstances
prioritizing
coercion,
mobilization
opportunities
appear,
as
was
the
case
in
2006,
and
arguably
has
been
ever
since.
Instead
of
wallowing
in
the
sophistication
of
hegemonic
apparatuses,
identifying
the
blocking
points
they
create
should
feed
contributions
to
counter-hegemonic
strategy.
One
of
several
racial
issues
to
be
tackled
that
way
is
the
immigration
regime.
The
sense
of
defeat
following
the
short-term
victory
of
the
2006
mass
movement,
has
been
enhanced
by
Democratic
party
policies
intensifying
or
allowing
more
coercion,
and
channeling
the
movement's
demands
into
""Comprehensive
Immigration
Reform""
bills
that
could
be
termed
""IRCA
2.0"".
Mobilizations
around
immediate
demands
like
stopping
all
deportations
(""Not
1
More""
campaign)
and
tactical
innovations
involving
""coming
out""
and
daring
acts
of
civil
disobedience
(aiming
at
demonstrating
that
the
risks
of
being
undocumented
are
lower
than
they
seem
especially
when
people
get
organized),
appear
as
important
contributions.
Frequently
embraced
by
immigrant
leaders
with
an
ultimate
""legalization
for
all""
agenda,
those
perspectives
do
not
directly
demand
a
legalization
plan
but
avert
the
divisive
logic
of
IRCA-like
bills
(selective
legalization,
repression,
relaunching
the
regime).
They
may
thus
be
better
suited
to
both
rebuilding
the
dynamic
and
reinventing
the
strategic
goals
of
immigrant
mobilization,
in
a
counter-hegemonic
fashion.
Tobias
Boos
The
Latin-American
discussion
about
populism
has
a
long
and
rich
tradition.
Since
the
election
of
the
so
called
progressive
governments
in
the
region
there
have
been
numerous
contributions
to
the
debate,
especially
with
regard
to
Ernesto
Laclaus
concept
of
populism.
One
of
the
first
and
most
interesting
critiques
of
his
approach
was
already
formulated
by
Portantiero
and
de
pola
in
1981.
In
this
article
they
observe
a
kind
of
organicist
hegemony
that
characterizes
existing
populist
governments
which
reduces
the
heterogeneity
of
popular
demands.
The
paper
utilizes
Antonio
Gramscis
concepts
of
common
sense
and
moral
and
intellectual
leadership
and
stresses
their
fundamental
role
in
regard
to
the
process
of
gaining
hegemony.
By
exploring
the
representations
of
kirchnerist
militants
and
sympathisers
about
the
current
balance
of
forces
and
the
political
situation
it
shows
that
their
interpretations
contain
a
very
specific
idea
of
the
state
structuring
their
vision
of
politics.
Derek
Boothman
There
has
recently
come
to
light
the
handwritten
original
version
of
the
longest
single
piece
written
by
Gramsci
before
the
highly
influential
essay
on
the
Southern
question
on
which
he
was
working
at
the
time
of
his
arrest
in
1926.
This
earlier
essay,
on
the
factory
council
and
communist
movement,
including
the
role
of
the
weekly
journal
LOrdine
Nuovo,
was
his
direct
and
immediate
assessment
of
the
events
leading
up
to
the
red
two
years
(biennio
rosso)
in
Turin,
a
city
defined
in
the
essay
as
the
Petrograd
of
the
Italian
proletarian
Revolution.
It
deals
in
particular
with
the
mass
general
strike
of
April
1920,
news
of
which,
according
to
the
manuscripts
opening
lines,
was
received
enthusiastically
in
Russia.
At
its
height
the
month-long
strike
involved
half
a
million
people
out
of
a
regional
population
of
4
million,
the
working-class
mass
being
led
solely
by
the
[Turinese]
Section
of
the
Socialist
Party,
comprised
in
its
absolute
entirety
of
communist
workers.
According
to
an
annotation
in
another
hand
on
a
later
typed-up
version,
the
essay
consists
of
fifteen
pages
with,
as
was
Gramscis
wont,
very
few
corrections,
and
dates
to
the
summer
or
early
autumn
of
1920.
It
thus
predates
both
the
founding
congress
of
the
Italian
Communist
Party
(January
1921)
and
Gramscis
eighteen-month
stint
as
an
Italian
representative
in
Moscow
on
the
Executive
and
Presidium
of
the
Comintern.
Printed
versions
of
the
essay,
published
at
the
time,
are
hard
to
come
by
in
any
language,
and
in
any
case
such
writings
were
normally
subject
to
editing
for
length,
or
in
order
to
cut
material
judged
extraneous
to
other
national
experiences
(not
to
mention
possible
inaccuracies
in
translation),
and
so
the
manuscript
version
assumes
added
importance.
As
well
as
its
purely
historical
interest,
as
a
comment
by
a
leading
participant
in
the
events
themselves,
what
emerges
is
an
early
attempt
by
Gramsci
to
give
a
detailed
break-down
of
class
forces
and
of
the
organizations
of
the
urban
working
class,
to
discuss
the
question
of
power
in
society
and
the
value
even
of
defeats
and
to
define
a
politics
of
alliances.
In
the
space
allotted,
we
shall
try
to
illustrate
the
main
lines
of
the
document
and
put
them
into
the
context
of
Gramscis
subsequent
development.
Toby
Boraman
Polynesian
involvement
in
the
New
Zealand
strike
wave
from
the
late
1960s
to
the
mid-
1980s
Marxists
in
Anglophone
countries
have
largely
neglected
the
role
indigenous
peoples
have
played
in
class
struggle,
often
based
on
the
assumption
that
indigenous
people
are
highly
marginal
to
that
struggle.
Furthermore,
despite
wage
labour
being
an
integral
part
of
Polynesian
life
in
New
Zealand,
studies
of
Polynesians
in
New
Zealand
have
largely
ignored
it.
Commentators
often
assume
that
Polynesians
are
marginalised
victims
of
capital
(including
colonialism
and
imperialism)
and
racism.
Even
labour
historians
have
almost
totally
ignored
the
role
Polynesians
have
played
in
the
labour
movement.
Far
from
being
helpless
victims,
many
Polynesians
participated
in
numerous
struggles
in
the
workplace
during
the
upturn
in
workplace
dissent
in
New
Zealand
from
the
late
1960s
to
the
mid-
1980s.
Indeed,
Mori
workers
were
generally
at
the
forefront
of
this
struggle.
Many
Pasifika
migrants
and
their
descendants
also
became
active
and
important
participants
in
labour
struggle
by
the
mid-
to
late
1970s,
although
some
barriers
to
involvement
remained.
In
the
workplace,
many
Polynesians
brought
aspects
of
their
culture
to
their
struggle
to
humanise,
minimise
and
resist
wage
work.
As
such
they
often
created,
adopted
and
adapted
various
forms
of
informal
and
formal
resistance
in
the
workplace.
To
some
extent,
aspects
of
Polynesian
culture
shaped
many
strikes
and
other
forms
of
dissent.
While
a
major
fusing
of
class
and
ethnicity
occurred,
by
the
early
1980s
bitter
conflict
developed
between
some
advocates
of
Maori
sovereignty
and
some
trade
unions.
This
paper
will
examine
Polynesian
involvement
in
workplace
unrest
in
three
industries
the
timber
industry,
the
meat
processing
industry
and
the
cleaning
industry."
Kajsa
Borgns
An
ecological
Marxist
critique
of
the
green
growth
and
no-growth
concepts
The
political
idea
of
green
growth
motivates
most
of
todays
so
called
sustainability
policies
in
developed
countries.
As
a
counter-argument,
ecological
economists
have
coined
the
idea
of
no-growth
or
steady
state
economics
as
a
sustainability
goal.
Whereas
on
the
one
hand
the
former
serves
as
an
attempt
to
reconcile
the
demands
of
capitalist
economies
and
democratic
states
on
behalf
of
any
real
ecological
sustainability,
no-growth
theories
often
underestimate
the
forces
and
logics
of
both
capital
and
state.
Taking
an
ecological
Marxist
and
Marxist
crisis
theory
perspective
as
its
starting
point,
this
article
scrutinizes
green
growth
and
no-growth
logics
and
argues
that
strategies
need
to
be
more
radical
in
order
to
achieve
a
truly
sustainable
economy.
Bruno
Bosteels
Discourse
and
ideology
of
the
European
far-right
and
the
fertile
soil
for
the
rise
of
Fascism
In
this
paper
I
will
explore
what
it
is
about
the
discourse
and
ideology
of
European
far-right
politicians
like
Geert
Wilders,
Marine
Le
Pen
and
Nigel
Farage
that
makes
their
rhetoric
so
effective
and
how
the
left
and
relevant
actors
like
migrant
organizations
in
different
countries
have
responded
to
the
challenge
posed
by
them.
Through
discourse
analysis,
psychoanalytic
evaluations
of
key
right-wing
figures,
analyzing
the
social
basis
of
their
organizations
and
the
movements
they
represent
as
well
as
the
ideological
pervasiveness
of
everyday
racism
and
tendencies
towards
authoritarianism
in
European
societies
I
will
try
to
contribute
to
a
more
balanced
explanation
with
regards
to
the
psychological
and
socio-
economic
factors
that
lay
behind
the
rise
of
the
far-right
in
Europe.
By
comparing
the
different
responses
to
the
challenge
of
the
far-right
by
different
leftist
actors
I
hope
to
draw
lessons
in
how
to
counter
the
far-right
more/most
effectively.
Craig
Brandist
Here
the
hegemonic
apparatus
of
the
Soviet
state
during
the
NEP
period
required
continual
adjustment
to
guard
against
encouraging
separatist
sentiments
on
the
part
of
the
mainly
rural
Ukrainian-speaking
population,
while
avoiding
resentments
on
the
part
of
the
mainly
Russian-speaking
urban
proletariat.
In
addition
to
these
problems,
the
modalities
of
the
concessions
made
were
affected
by
the
emergence
of
a
relatively
wealthy
peasant
minority
and
petty
urban
capitalists
as
a
direct
result
of
the
NEP
itself,
as
well
as
the
complications
brought
about
by
the
presence
of
significant
national
minorities
(Jewish,
Greek,
Romanian
etc)
within
the
Ukrainian
SSR.
Debates
over
the
formulation
of
Soviet
policy
in
Ukraine
occupied
all
the
leading
Bolsheviks
from
the
intense
debates
about
general
nationality
policy
in
1923
until
the
regimes
move
to
crush
peasant
resistance
to
collectivisation
at
the
end
of
the
decade.
There
was
an
intense
dialogue
between
Ukrainian
Party
leaders
(Rakovskii,
Lebed,
Shumskii,
Korniushin)
and
those
at
the
Centre
(Zinovev,
Bukharin,
Stalin),
which
can
be
traced
through
arguments
at
the
major
Party
congresses
and
in
correspondence
and
other
documentation
that
circulated
between
State
and
Party
agencies.
There
is
a
considerable
level
of
sophistication
in
these
debates
that
reveal
the
ways
in
which
the
notion
of
hegemony
was
developed
and
applied
throughout
the
decade.
Consideration
of
such
material
shows
that
Gramscis
writing
about
the
linguistic
and
cultural
dimensions
of
hegemony
in
no
way
exhaust
Marxist
consideration
of
the
question
in
the
1920s,
but
were
to
some
extent
dependent
upon
these
discussions.
This
has
importance
both
in
understanding
the
relationship
of
early
Soviet
thought
to
the
former
colonies
of
the
USSR,
but
also
in
understanding
some
of
the
contours
of
the
political
situation
in
Ukraine
today."
Heather
Brown
As
the
most
recent
report
from
the
UN
on
Climate
Change
argues,
it
is
no
longer
possible
to
ignore
the
effects
of
human
destruction
of
the
environment.
Some
form
of
climate
change
in
the
present
is
inevitable
and
will
have
significant
impacts
on
various
ecosystems
and
societies.
The
goal
according
to
the
UN
International
Panel
on
Climate
change
is
in
part
to
mitigate
these
effects.
The
question
remains,
however,
how
do
we
approach
the
human
costs
of
climate
change
and
the
uneven
effects
of
a
reversal
of
this
process?
In
recent
years
there
has
been
a
significant
return
to
Marx
to
theorize
questions
of
race,
gender
and
economics
in
light
of
the
contradictions
and
crises
of
late
capitalism.
The
same
has
also
been
true
of
Marxist
ecology.
However,
many
of
these
recent
studies
take
up
particular
aspects
of
Marxs
and/or
Engelss
work
relative
to
environmental
concerns
rather
than
provide
a
complete
philosophical
perspective
of
Marxs
ecology.
These
studies
certainly
do
provide
an
important
starting
point
for
a
Marxian
ecological
perspective
that
does
not
carry
the
burden
of
Soviet
style
anti-ecological
development
and
in
fact,
illustrates
that
Marxs
perspectives
on
ecology
could
not
be
further
away
from
these
types
of
perspectives.
Arguing
that
Marx
and/or
a
Marxian
perspective
on
the
environment
is
compatible
with
particular
ecological
concerns
is
not
enough,
however.
If
we
are
able
to
find
an
alternative
to
the
rapacious
nature
of
capitalist
economic
development
that
leaves
many
behind,
then
we
must
create
a
fully
worked
out
philosophical
perspective
on
ecology
that
takes
account
of
various
forms
of
human
oppression
as
well.
It
is
hoped
that
this
paper
will
begin
to
fill
this
philosophical
gap
and
show
that
Marx
provided
an
outline
for
a
theory
of
the
human
impact
on
the
environment
that
is
useful
for
today,
albeit
with
some
problematic
aspects.
Looking
at
the
whole
of
Marxs
work,
I
argue
that
his
continuing
emphasis
on
overcoming
dualisms
and
especially
regarding
humanitys
relation
to
nature
provides
a
starting
point
for
a
theory
of
ecology
that
can
account
for
both
human
effects
on
nature
and
the
seemingly
parallel
oppression
based
on
race,
gender
and
class
without
privileging
one
aspect
over
the
others.
Iain
Bruce
2004;
'The
Real
Venezuela:
making
socialism
in
the
21st
century',
Pluto
Press,
London,
2009.
Between
2010
and
2012
he
made
a
series
of
four
documentaries
for
Telesur
on
climate
change
issues
in
Latin
America.
He
also
contributes
on
Latin
America
to
International
Viewpoint
and
is
a
supporter
of
Socialist
Resistance.
Dick
Bryan
Michael
Rafferty
"In
the
growing
literature
on
financialization,
there
is
little
engagement
with
the
labour
market.
That
which
exists
focuses
predominantly
on
the
idea
of
shareholder
value,
and
a
competitive
pressure
that
comes
into
a
workplace,
with
direct
ramifications
for
labour.
But
here
finance
expresses
analytically
as
an
exogenous
pressure.
So
how
do
we
think
of
employment,
and
the
appropriation
of
surplus
value,
as
a
process
into
which
financial
modes
of
calculation
have
entered.
In
particular,
how
do
we
frame
the
pricing
of
risk,
and
strategy
shifting
of
risk
in
the
employment
context
(and
how
does
the
conception
of
surplus
value
itself
change
when
we
consider
the
pricing
of
risk)?
In
this
paper,
we
try
to
think
employment
through
the
discourse
of
finance,
both
to
feature
the
pricing
and
trading
of
risk
-
a
process
that
needs
to
be
integrated
into
the
conception
of
surplus
value
and
so
that
the
analysis
of
class
in
relation
to
financialization
can
be
advanced.
At
the
moment,
finance
and
class
operate
on
quite
different
analytical
terrains.
To
think
the
connections
requires
that
there
be
ways
to
frame
each
in
relation
to
the
other
via
more
than
the
discipline
of
shareholder
value.
Accordingly,
this
paper
frames
employment
and
surplus
value
via
the
categories
of
options
and
swaps,
so
that
these
connections
might
be
explored."
Tom
Bunyard
'Dialectical,
Strategic
Thought':
An
Outline
of
the
Model
of
Praxis
that
Supports
Guy
Debord's
Theory
of
'Spectacle'
Guy
Debords
famous
concept
of
spectacle
is
perhaps
one
of
the
most
widely
misunderstood
and
misappropriated
ideas
in
contemporary
theory.
This
paper
will
respond
to
that
problem
by
offering
a
clarification
of
the
concept,
advanced
via
a
discussion
of
the
philosophical
positions
that
inform
Debords
often
dense
formulations.
Through
doing
so,
the
paper
will
show
that
the
conceptual
framework
that
the
theory
rests
upon
possesses
far
greater
sophistication
and
complexity
than
is
often
acknowledged,
insofar
as
it
contains
the
following,
still
largely
ignored
components:
1)
a
philosophical
anthropology;
2)
a
speculative
philosophy
of
history;
3)
an
ethics;
4)
the
rudiments
of
an
epistemology;
5)
an
idiosyncratic
version
of
Hegelian
Marxism;
6)
a
dialectical
conception
of
strategy.
Through
outlining
those
elements
the
essay
will
advance
the
following,
broader
argument.
Debords
work
is
best
understood
as
a
20th
Century
re-articulation
of
the
classical
19th
Century
concern
with
realising
philosophy
in
lived
praxis;
after
all,
the
heralded
supersession
of
spectacular
representation,
in
all
of
its
various
formulations
within
his
thought,
essentially
revolves
around
the
need
to
begin
consciously
making
history,
as
opposed
to
merely
contemplating
and
interpreting
its
results.
Therefore,
if
his
theory
is
indeed
to
be
viewed
as
having
become
more
relevant
than
ever,
as
many
of
his
more
enthusiastic
commentators
would
have
it,
then
that
key
orientation
towards
praxis
should
form
part
of
its
purported
relevance.
The
paper
will
show
that
such
a
claim
to
pertinence
can
indeed
be
made:
that
whilst
the
theory
may
be
of
limited
value
as
an
account
of
modern
capitalism,
the
model
of
praxis
that
one
can
draw
from
its
conceptual
mechanics
a
model
that
amounts,
we
will
argue,
to
a
highly
politicised
ethics
may,
nonetheless,
be
of
contemporary
interest.
Florian
Butollo
Cahill
the
roll
out
of
neoliberal
policy,
as
well
as
why
actually
existing
neoliberalism
is
not
simply
a
mirror
of
neoliberal
doctrines.
It
argues
that
the
role
played
by
neoliberal
doctrines
in
the
roll
out
of
actually
existing
neoliberalism
is
best
appreciated
if
such
doctrines
are
read
as
ideology.
The
paper
draws
upon
Marxs
distinction
between
essence
and
appearance
in
Capital
to
argue
that
neoliberal
doctrines
are
ideological
in
the
sense
that
they
offer
both
a
partial
reflection
of
transformations
to
capitalist
economies
since
the
1970s,
as
well
as
masking
the
key
social
relations
at
the
heart
of
such
transformations.
Ankica
Cakardic
Theory
of
accumulation
and
Luxemburgian
analysis
of
reproductive
labour
and
current
crises
"While
writing
An
Anti-Critique:
The
Accumulation
of
Capital,
or
What
the
Epigones
have
Made
of
Marxs
Theory
where
she
very
concisely
outlines
her
thesis
on
capital
accumulation
Rosa
Luxemburg
argues
that
the
economic
roots
of
imperialism
can
be
derived
from
the
accumulation
of
capital
and
that
imperialism
in
general
represents
a
specific
mode
of
accumulation.
From
that
point
onwards
she
will
develop
her
critique
of
Marx,
especially
when
it
comes
to
the
third
part
of
the
second
volume
of
""Capital""
where
Marx
analyses
the
question
of
reproduction.
With
a
summary
review
of
this
discussion,
we
will
try
to
see
whether
it
is
possible
to
offer
a
Luxemburgian
analysis
of
the
current
crisis,
and
reflect
on
the
methodological
and
theoretical
framework
we
would
need
to
consider.
In
the
end
we
will
try
to
use
this
instrument
for
the
materialistic
analysis
of
women's
reproductive
labor
and
its
economic
role
in
the
accumulation
of
capital,
taking
into
account
the
relation
between
the
productive
and
unproductive
labor
as
it
is
decomposed
in
Rosa
Luxemburgs
several
texts
from
1902nd
to
1914th."
Lindberg
Campos
Filho
The
fight
against
Brazilian
capitalist
patriarchy
and
racism:
exploitation,
rape
culture
and
urban
lynchings
The
aim
of
this
paper
is
an
analysis
of
the
intensification
of
exploitation
by
early
twentieth-
first
century
Brazilian
capitalism
through
homo
and
transphobia,
sexism
and
racism
in
the
light
of
the
formation
of
Brazilian
bourgeois
society
in
late
nineteenth
century.
I
analyse
a
number
of
different
examples
from
mass
culture
and
of
social
dynamics
and
practices,
for
instance,
the
first
gay
kiss
in
a
nationwide
soap
opera
broadcast,
the
widespread
Brazilian
sexism,
the
increasing
visibility
of
lynchings
in
urban
peripheries
and
domestic
workers's
working
conditions.
These
realities
reveal
that
Brazilian
capitalism
combines
oppression
with
exploitation
in
order
to
sophisticate
and
legitimise
the
latter.
In
addition
to
that,
I
take
into
consideration
the
process
of
transition
from
slavery
based
to
a
mass
consumption
society
in
the
turn
of
the
century
to
highlight
the
specific
and
local
conditions
that
made
such
social
structure
possible.
I
briefly
evaluate
the
corresponding
responses
given
by
social
movements
and
revolutionary
organizations
in
Brazil
and
possible
perspectives.
Even
though
it
can
be
observed
a
series
of
significant
advancements,
especially
in
terms
of
LGBT
visibility
and
racial
oppression,
capitalist
accumulation
and
private
property
are
untouched
which,
I
argue,
are
the
real
basis
of
oppression
and
one
of
the
reasons
why
Brazilian
capitalism
still
survives.
I
use
theoretical
frameworks
provided
by
cultural
materialist
critics
such
as
Fredric
Jameson,
Raymond
Williams,
Roberto
Schwarz,
Antonio
Candido
and
Maria
Elisa
Cevasco
in
order
to
deepen
this
analysis.
Cagri
Carikci
Neoliberal
Transformation
of
the
State,
Class
Struggle
and
Capital:
Lessons
from
Privatisation
of
Turkeys
Mining
Sector
"The
issue
of
privatisation
in
public
sector
and
its
effects
on
the
relations
between
the
state,
capital
and
classes
have
been
broadly
discussed
in
recent
years.
This
paper
aims
to
make
a
critical
analysis
of
the
privatisation
in
the
mining
sector
in
Turkey
during
the
Justice
and
Development
Party
(AKP)
period
to
identify
the
specific
political
policies
and
strategies
AKP
has
pursued
in
this
process
and
their
implications
on
the
states
neoliberal
transformation.
Within
this
framework,
this
paper
will
analyse
the
place
of
the
mining
sector
in
Turkeys
economy
and
explain
the
significance
of
the
privatisation
process
in
terms
of
reproduction
of
labour
and
class
struggle.
An
effort
will
be
made
to
express,
through
a
two-way
dynamic
analysis,
the
influence
of
the
state
regulation
over
social
relations
and
the
impact
of
class
struggle
which
is
implicit
in
the
way
the
society
functions
on
the
state,
institutions
and
reforms.
Also
an
emphasis
will
be
laid
on
the
importance
of
the
relations
and
conflict
between
different
fractions
of
capital
during
the
AKP
period.
The
paper
concludes
that
behind
these
privatisations
lies
a
political
process,
which
has
deepened
the
domination
of
the
capital
over
the
state."
Samuel
Carlshamre
early
1980s
in
a
number
of
multi-volume
studies
of
the
subject
written
from
a
Marxist
perspective.
In
this
presentation,
however,
the
focus
will
lie
rather
on
the
debates
and
discussions
carried
out
in
al-Tariq,
debates
in
which,
more
clearly
perhaps
than
the
monographs,
the
internal
deliberations
and
conflicts
within
the
Marxist
circles
came
to
be
highlighted.
For
the
writers
involved
in
these
debates
such
as
Husayn
Muruwwah,
Tayyib
Tizini,
Mahdi
Amil,
Tawfiq
Sallum
and
many
more
the
subject
in
itself
presented
a
number
of
problems,
such
the
questions
of
relationship
of
base
and
superstructure,
ideology
and
scientificity,
use
and
truth
in
the
writing
of
history,
and
not
least
that
of
the
relationship
between
the
very
categories
or
knowledge
objects
of
History
and
Heritage
themselves.
In
this
relationship
is
highlighted
the
potentially
conflicting
uses
and
functions
of
(writing
about)
the
past,
tentatively
formulated
as
the
tension
between
identity
formation
(Heritage)
and
scientific
knowledge
(History).
In
this
paper,
then,
the
focus
will
be
on
the
very
foundations
of
the
Arabic
discourse
about
Heritage
from
a
Marxist
perspective.
From
a
theoretical
view
point
grounded
in
the
ideas
of
Historical
Materialism
with
pretence
to
represent
actual,
scientific
knowledge
about
the
past
what
use
could
there
be
in
approaching
such
a
object
of
knowledge?
If
not
discarded
altogether,
then
how
did
it
need
to
be
transformed,
to
become
manageable
by
the
theoretical
tools
of
Marxism?
What
is
the
relationship
that
is
to
be
established
between
the
past
and
the
present
to
be,
and
how
does
it
compare
to
other
such
formulations,
represented
by
non-Marxist
writers
on
the
subject?
Is
the
project
at
hand
fundamentally
one
of
negative
critique,
or
of
positive
re-appropriation?
While
this
discussion
can
shed
light
on
some
important
specific
issues
and
predicaments
of
Arabic
society
and
the
left
in
these
societies,
it
also
ties
in
with
questions
and
theories
of
a
decidedly
universal
validity,
such
as
the
relationship
between
materiality
and
culture,
cultural
heritage
and
history,
as
developed
not
least
by
Marxist
theoreticians
such
as
Frederic
Jameson
and
Walter
Benjamin."
Thomas
Carmichael
of
his
late
work
on
aleatory
materialism.
Consider,
for
example,
the
role
that
Althusser
assigns
to
culture
in
his
own
work.
In
his
unpublished
1982
interview
with
Richard
Hyland,
Althusser
asserts
that
he
considers
his
essay
The
Piccolo
Teatro:
Bertolazzi
and
Brecht,
one
of
the
better
things
that
he
has
ever
written:
Je
crois
que
cest
une
des
meilleures
choses
que
jai
crites
(Althusser,
Conversation
avec
Richard
Hyland
2
juillet
1982,
IMEC
Fonds
Althusser
ALT2.
A46.-05.03,
p.
32).
If
we
are
inclined
to
heed
that
the
observation
tienne
Balibar
makes
in
his
remarks
at
Althussers
funeral
that
For
Marx
is
Althussers
one
great
book,
then
we
might
reasonably
ask
ourselves,
as
this
chapter
considers,
why
Althusser
would
value
so
highly
the
theatre
essay
in
that
book,
an
essay
that
seems
to
so
many
as
secondary
to
Contradiction
and
Overdetermination
or
On
the
Materialist
Dialectic
(Balibar,
crits,
121).
My
paper
also
takes
up
the
questions
posed
in
Althussers
own
unpublished
notes.
In
his
unpublished
1966
reflections
on
Machereys
Pour
une
thorie
de
la
production
littraire,
for
example,
the
phrases
ncessit
libre,
rencontre
de
ncissits,
du
clinamen,
and
thorie
de
la
rencontre
appear
prominently,
in
part
in
response
to
Machereys
own
discussion
of
necessity
in
A
Theory
of
Literary
Production
(Althusser,
Notes
sur
le
livre
de
Pierre
Macherey:
Pour
une
thorie
de
la
production
littraire
1966.
IMEC
Fonds
Althusser).
As
the
notes
on
Machereys
A
Theory
of
Literary
Production
would
indicate,
the
terms
that
will
guide
the
logic
of
Althussers
late
thought
often
appear
early,
and
these
terms
appear
most
often
in
the
field
of
cultural
analysis.
Matteo
Cavallaro
Towards
a
political
economy
of
radical
right
parties
According
to
Alesina
et
al.
(2001),
anti-immigrant
sentiment
and
racist
views
can
play
a
role
in
undermining
public
support
for
public
sector.
Roemer
et
al.
(2007)
furtherly
deveoped
this
idea
estimating
the
loss
of
public
expenditure
caused
by
widespread
racist
feelings.
Their
works,
however,
mainly
focus
on
the
trade-off
between
individual
preferences,
thus
leaving
unsolved
other
questions
such
as:
to
what
extent
do
these
attitudes
have
concrete
effects
on
the
economy?
What
is
the
role
of
radical
right
parties
?
And
what
can
we
say
of
social
blocks
behind
those
parties?
Goal
of
this
work
is
to
present
a
thorough
review
of
political
determinants
in
economics,
from
the
neoclassical
interpretation
to
the
approaches
focusing
on
individual
attitudes.
On
the
other
hand,
I
wish
to
introduce
a
plan
for
an
integrated
study
linking
social
classes,
radical
right
parties
and
economic
policy
keeping
in
mind
that
Policy
requires
politics
(Gourevitch
1986
:
1).
In
particular,
two
(both
Gramscian)
streams
seem
useful
reach
this
goal,
namely
the
social
blocks
approach
developed
during
the
last
years
by
Amable
et
al.
(2003,
2005,
2006
and
2012)
and
the
marxist
theory
of
the
state
as
proposed
by
Jessop
(2002
and
2006).
Developing
and
unifying
these
approaches
could
prove
to
be
insightful
in
understanding
the
role
of
radical
right,
as
well
as
other
political
forces,
in
capitalist
ecomies.
Riccardo
Cavallo
Chanson
Politicizing Theory : Philosophy and Praxis in critical marxism from Korsch to Krahl.
In
this
paper,
my
aim
will
be
to
examine
Western
Marxism
concept
with
a
quite
different
approach
than
Perry
Andersons
classical
category.
While
in
the
famous
Andersons
book
Wester
Marxism
is
assimilated
to
a
pessimistic
critique
of
the
proletariat
praxis,
to
a
philosophizing
estrangement
of
the
classical
marxian
critique
of
political
economy,
ill
argue
quite
differently
that
we
can
find
another
undercurrent
in
this
tradition,
which
leads
us
to
a
new
type
of
theory
and
praxis
unity
concept.
From
Karl
Korsch
seminal
text
Marxism
and
Philosophy
(1923)
to
Hans-Jrgen
Krahl
Konstitution
und
Klassenkampf
(1971),
the
problem
of
the
realization
of
philosophy
is
revisited
in
an
experimental
and
subversive
way.
& Ramon
Ribera-Fumaz
At
least
since
the
end
of
the
XVIIIth
century,
the
legal
institutions
that
settle
and
operate
repression
of
forbidden
conducts
have
been
approached
from
the
historical
perspective
of
their
never-ending
reforms,
or
of
their
abolition.
Therefore,
a
number
of
critical
studies
about
state
repression
and
criminal
law
have
tried
to
argue
that
existing
historical
institutions
could
not
be
abstractly
rubbed
out,
and
showed
instead
the
productive,
useful
and
indeed
inevitable
character
of
transgression
and
its
repression,
following
Marxs
dictum
of
the
social
benefits
of
crime
(Theories
of
Surplus-Value).
In
particular,
Rushe
and
Kirchheimer
analysed
the
penal
pattern
through
which
economic
structure
impacts
upon
law
and
makes
it
a
key-tool
of
labour
discipline
and
broader
exploitation
(Punishment
and
Social
Structure).
More
essentialy,
Pachukanis
account
of
criminalization
and
punishment
traced
the
deeper
legal
form
at
its
rise,
namely
the
commodity
form,
and
argued
that
law
becomes
a
formal
condition
to
reproduce
capitalism
and
reinforce
its
social
hierarchy.
Thus,
penal
pattern
and
commodity
form
theory
offer
two
different
ways
to
understand
the
connection
between
criminalization
and
penalty
on
one
side,
and
exploitation
and
social
domination
on
the
other.
Those
two
options
can
be
defined
as
structural
subordination
and
agentivity
of
criminal
law
since
law
expresses
and
shapes
class
struggle.
I
would
like
to
question
these
various
theories
of
legal
form
in
order
to
identify
the
principle
of
legality
criticism
that
structures
those
critical
theories
of
crime
(wether
they
be
engaged
with
a
restorative
justice
or
with
an
abolitionnist
framework).
Franois
Chesnais
Child
From Labia to Labour: an alternative to the performed body in mid-1970s feminist art
"From
1973
to
1975,
three
women
artists
Margaret
Harrison,
Kay
Hunt
and
Mary
Kelley
undertook
a
study
of
(mainly
women)
workers
in
a
Bermondsey
metal
box
factory.
The
project
was
born
out
of
their
engagement
with
the
Womens
Workshop
of
the
Artists
Union
and
was
more
akin
to
a
sociological
study
than
art,
producing
detailed
data
on
the
lives
of
these
workers.
The
research
culminated
in
an
installation,
exhibited
under
the
title
Women
and
Work:
A
Document
on
the
Division
of
Labour
in
Industry
(1973-5)
at
the
South
London
Art
Gallery.
The
piece
was
to
evidence
the
inequality
between
the
men
and
women
who
worked
at
the
factory.
The
work
is
dubbed
as
a
feminist
project
due
to
the
artists
whom
undertook
the
research
and
the
subject
of
the
project.
This
paper
will
consider
the
work
as
a
departure
from
the
dominant
models
of
feminist
art
of
the
mid-1970s
in
which
the
female
body
is
performed.
Through
examining
the
types
of
labour
-
performed
labour,
labour
as
knowledge
creation
and
the
actual
labour
of
the
subject
(creating
value
through
extracting
surplus)
-
it
will
be
argued
that
this
London-based
group
undertook
a
more
affective
feminist
critique
through
its
knowledge
creation."
Juan
Chingo
"The
category
of
skilled
labour
is
an
important
feature
of
two
areas
associated
with
Marxist
theory:
Marxs
labour
theory
of
value
(LTV)
and
labour
process
theory
(LPT).
Within
LTV,
debate
surrounds
the
mechanism
through
which
the
value
created
by
skilled
labour
is
reduced
to
that
of
simple
labour,
and
the
relationship
between
the
extra
value
skilled
labour
creates
and
the
extra
value
that
must
be
advanced
to
produce
or
reproduce
the
skilled
labour
power.
Marxs
own
writings
on
this
subject
in
Capital
and
the
Contribution
to
the
Critique
of
Political
Economy
are
brief
and
open
to
various
interpretations.
Arguably
Marxs
account
was
sufficient
for
the
period
in
which
he
was
writing,
in
which
a
mass
of
more
or
less
interchangeable
labourers
with
minimal
training
was
developing
in
the
factories
of
the
Industrial
Revolution.
Today,
it
would
be
hard
to
defend
such
a
position.
Within
LPT,
Bravermans
account
in
Labor
and
Monopoly
Capital
has
been
criticised
for
his
portrayal
of
deskilling
as
an
inevitable
outcome
of
a
battle
between
capital
and
labour
for
control
of
the
labour
process.
But
the
resulting
debates
in
LPT
pay
little
attention
to
LTV.
In
most
of
the
well-known
contributions
to
the
debate
on
deskilling,
value
simply
does
not
feature
in
any
rigorous
manner.
Instead
the
focus
is
on
concrete
qualities
of
labour
processes,
such
as
the
variety
of
tasks
performed
by
workers,
their
degree
of
autonomy,
their
level
of
education
and
training,
and
so
on.
Many
of
the
leading
exponents
of
LPT
reject
value
theory
altogether.
Making
sense
of
these
arguments
requires
that
we
reinstate
value
in
the
conceptualisation
of
the
labour
process.
Marx
argues
that
labour
power
has
a
two-fold
character,
generating
both
values
and
use-values.
I
shall
propose
an
account
that
considers
the
two-fold
nature
of
skilled
labour
power.
In
this
approach,
concrete
expressions
of
skilled
labour
are
subordinated
to
the
drive
to
generate
and
appropriate
surplus
value
by
capital,
which
is
engaged
in
a
competitive
battle
of
accumulation.
The
drive
to
deskill,
or
to
enhance
the
skills
of,
labour
can
be
understood
in
this
framework.
At
the
same
time,
it
is
today
necessary
to
focus
not
on
the
individual
worker
as
bearer
of
simple
labour,
but
the
collective
labourer
as
a
composite
formed
of
different
individual
labour
powers.
This
reformulation
provides
a
basis
for
a
reassessment
of
Bravermans
deskilling
thesis,
one
that
is
more
sensitive
to
the
various
counter-tendencies
that
generate
new
areas
of
skilled
labour."
Rossana
Cillo
The
struggles
of
immigrant
workers
in
the
logistics
and
freight
transport
sectors
in
Italy
"Since
2008
the
logistics
and
freight
transport
sectors
in
Italy
have
been
affected
by
an
increasing
number
of
strikes,
that
have
been
successful
thanks
to
the
organization
activities
by
the
independent
trade
union
Si-Cobas
and
the
self-activation
of
precarious
immigrant
The Messianic Time of Value. On The Political Theology of the new Wertkritik
"This
paper
attempts
to
critically
evaluate
the
philosophical
premises
and
practical
consequences
of
the
new
Wertkritik
(Postone,
Kurz,
Jappe
etc.)
that
are
responsible
for
its
oscillation
between
a
non-historical
materialism
and
a
historical
non-materialism
(formalism).
The
contemporary
interest
in
this
new
theory
of
value
is
due
to
the
fact
that
it
responds
particularly
well
to
the
double
nature
of
our
present
predicament:
the
global
crisis
of
capitalism,
together
with
the
evident
absence
of
a
really
existing
social
alternative,
reflected
into
the
core
arguments
of
this
theory:
the
bitter
emphasis
on
the
inescapable
and
impersonal
unfolding
of
the
logic
of
value
and
the
acute
irrelevance
of
the
subjective
factor.
The
first
part
will
critically
discuss
some
of
the
philosophical
premises
of
this
intellectual
direction,
namely
the
articulation
between
time,
history
and
revelation.
Briefly,
it
will
be
argued
that
this
reading
of
Marxs
theory
of
value
entails
a
direct
leap
from
history
(the
contingent
birth
of
capitalism
in
England)
to
a
fatal
and
teleological
process
of
unfolding
and
revelation
of
the
logic
of
value.
Thus
history
is
merely
the
intra-apocalyptic
distance
between
the
revelation
of
its
abstract
logic
and
final
realization.
A
sort
of
messianic
time
which
strikingly
resembles
Fukuyamas
post-history.
This
highly
metaphysical
touch
is
also
visible
in
the
practical
consequences
that
this
theory
entails.
On
the
one
hand,
an
unexplainable
rediscovered
subjectivism,
as
program
for
the
post-capitalist
future
(already
present),
and,
on
the
other
hand,
the
retreat
into
communitaristic
and
non-mediated
forms
of
social
organization,
caused
by
the
theorys
hasty
and
risky
identification
of
value
with
social
abstraction
as
such."
Nicola
Clewer
"The
means
by
which
capitalism
survives,
the
machinations
in
which
it
must
always
engaged,
include
ideological
and
cultural
as
much
as
do
social
and
economic
transformations.
Since
the
early
1980s,
alongside
the
rise
of
neoliberalism,
there
has
been
a
renaissance
in
memorial
and
monument
building
in
the
West
and
a
concomitant
burgeoning
of
academic
interest
in
this
area.
This
efflorescence
in
memorial
forms
and
discourses
has
commonly
been
linked
to
the
rise
of
postmodernism.
The
complex
relationship
between
postmodernism
and
neoliberalism
has
been
subject
detailed
and
insightful
analysis
by
a
number
of
theorists
including,
most
influentially,
Fredric
Jameson
and
David
Harvey
and,
more
recently,
the
likes
of
Jodi
Dean
and
Mark
Fisher.
But
what
about
the
relationship
between
neoliberalism
and
this
boom
in
memorialisation?
Focusing
on
large-scale
national
memorial
projects
in
the
US
and
Germany,
this
paper
situates
this
renaissance
in
memorial
building
within
the
context
of
a
crisis
of
legitimacy
within
capitalists
states
which
began
in
the
1970s.
I
argue
that,
within
the
context
of
a
wider
transformation
from
the
embedded
liberalism
of
the
post-war
period
to
the
contemporary
neoliberal
conjuncture,
there
has
been
a
proliferation
of
memorial
projects
which
draw
on
postmodern
aesthetics
in
order,
ultimately,
to
legitimate
the
state
as
it
reconfigures
itself
in
light
of
the
contemporary
demands
of
capitalism."
Matthew
Cole
below
them
to
increasing
competition
for
work.
Sometimes
proletarians
are
forced
out
of
work
altogether,
joining
the
reserve
army
of
the
unemployed
or
perhaps
are
exorcised
entirely
into
the
surplus
population.
A
lucid
analysis
of
the
dynamics
of
proletarianisation
is
crucial
for
understanding
the
underlying
social
conditions
that
accompany
or
enable
the
survival
of
capitalism."
Constantinou
Constantinos
&
Leandros
Savvides
No pinkwashing
"This
paper
situates
the
development
of
a
conscious
strategy
of
Pinkwashing
by
the
Israeli
state
in
the
context
of
the
broader
hasbara/Brand
Israel
campaign;
playing
on
the
growth
of
Islamaphobia
and
anti-Arab
prejudice
in
the
post-9/11
period.
It
will
explore
why
the
LGBTQ
communities
particular
gay
men
-
are
seen
as
a
target
for
this
propaganda
and
discuss
the
concept
of
homonationalism
in
this
context.
It
will
situate
pinkwashing,
as
all
aspects
of
the
ideological
offensive
of
the
Israeli
state
in
the
complete
obliteration
of
any
agency
of
the
Palestinian
people.
LGBTQ
Palestinians
only
exist
in
this
grotesque
fantasy
as
victims
apparently
fleeing
to
the
apparently
safe
haven
of
Israel
to
distract
from
and
normalize
the
settler
colonial
and
apartheid
reality
that
the
state
of
Israel
has
established
on
the
ground
which
oppresses
all
Palestinians
regardless
of
sexuality
or
gender
identity.
It
will
explore
some
of
the
campaigning
tactics
used
by
anti-
Pinkwashing
activists
particularly
in
Britain
but
drawing
on
experiences
in
the
USA,
Canada,
Portugal
and
the
Netherlands
including
links
with
LGBTQ
Palestinian
organisations.
It
will
discuss
the
extent
to
which
such
activism
has
impacted
on
Palestine
solidarity
campaigning
and
LGBTQ
activism.
It
is
submitted
as
part
of
the
Marxist-feminist
stream
and
relates
to
topics
on
homonationalism,
racism
and
islamaphobia
and
queer
subjects
listed
as
topics
for
the
stream"
Estelle
Cooch
"Numerous
authors
have
written
on
the
links
between
the
victories
won
by
second
wave
feminism
and
their
consequent
manipulation
by
neoliberal
ideology
throughout
the
1980s.
This
paper
is
the
product
of
extensive
interviews
with
current
and
past
university
feminist
society
presidents
and
interviews
with
those
at
the
heart
of
organising
the
burgeoning
new
movement
in
the
UK
SlutWalk,
UK
Feminista,
Object,
International
Union
of
Sexworkers
etc.
It
will
provide
quantitative
evidence
looking
at
what
the
new
feminists
have
taken
from
the
second
wave
and
to
what
extent
they
think
the
victories
won;
choice,
sexual
freedom
and
financial
independence,
have
allowed
capitalism
to
reconstitute
itself
in
a
more
vicious
form.
Was
feminism
a
Trojan
horse
for
what
has
been
termed
the
new
sexism.
It
will
attempt
to
chart
the
relationship
of
the
womens
movement
to
other
movements
It
will
ask
if
the
largely
anti-racist
nature
of
the
movement
in
the
UK
is
related
to
the
rise
of
the
anti-war
movement
in
the
early
2000s.
It
will
also
consider
if
the
class
basis
to
slut
shaming
that
was
identified
in
a
recent
study
published
in
Social
Psychology
Quarterly
in
the
US
is
equally
applicable
to
the
UK.
It
will
consider
how
we
can
transform
the
more
atomised
new
feminism
into
a
real
social
movement.
It
will
conclude
by
looking
at
the
way
in
which
new
feminists
attempt
to
link
personal
liberation
with
social
transformation.
Authors
considered
include
Cinzia
Arruza,
Nancy
Fraser,
Gail
Dines,
Laura
Bates"
Matthew
Cooper
We
are
not
all
multiculturalists
now:
the
recasting
of
multiculturalism
as
state
policy
in
Britain
since
2001.
We
are
not
all
multiculturalists
now:
the
recasting
of
multiculturalism
as
state
policy
in
Britain
since
2001.
There
is,
even
within
the
left,
no
agreed
understanding
of
the
state
policy
of
multiculturalism.
This
paper
will
attempt
to
move
towards
a
source
based
history
of
multiculturalism
in
Britain.
Initially
multiculturalism
was
a
policy
(or
perhaps
little
more
than
a
series
of
rhetorical
political
stances)
pursued
by
political
actors
in
a
period
of
post-colonial
migration
which
attempted
to
manage
the
position
of
racialised
minorities
within
class
society.
The
body
of
this
paper
will
attempt
to
understand
how
popular
and
popularist
narratives
of
the
failure
of
such
multiculturalism
have
developed
in
Britain
since
the
mid-1980s.
This
critique
from
the
right
coincided
with
a
changing
context.
If
multiculturalism
in
its
first
phase
was
linked
to
post-colonial
migration,
in
this
second
phase
the
deep
context
was
given
by
the
increasing
dominance
of
neo-liberal
ideas
and
the
globalised
economy
in
which
migration
was
no
longer
the
legacy
of
Empire.
Multiculturalism
became
a
fractured
set
of
policies,
some
only
in
the
imagination
of
its
opponents,
mutating
through
decisive
moments
such
as
the
Rushdie
affair
of
1989
to
the
riots
of
2001
and
9/11.
This
paper
will
conclude
with
an
examination
of
how
diversity
is
understood
in
terms
of
state
policy
in
the
period
since
2001
in
the
context
of
the
'war
on
terror'
and
the
evolving
paradigm
of
community
cohesion."
Luke
Cooper
"Few
questions
have
been
more
contested
amongst
Marxists
than
that
concerned
with
the
nature
of
the
state
socialist
regimes
of
the
last
century.
Despite
the
manifest
differences
between
the
various
competing
paradigms
on
the
categorization
of
these
regimes,
it
is
the
shared
assumptions
that
underpinned
the
debate
which
arguably
require
the
most
radical
reconsideration.
The
shorthand
to
which
the
debate
was
frequently
referred,
the
Russian
question,
encapsulates
these
problems,
for
it
carried
with
it
two
dubious
implicit
presuppositions.
Firstly,
it
was
assumed
that
a
model
of
politics
and
economy
developed
as
a
result
of
largely
endogenous
challenges
faced
by
Russian
society
in
the
1920s
and
1930s.
As
such,
arguments
tended
to
focus
merely
on
the
timing
and
class
dynamic
of
a
process
treated
as
essentially
internal.
Secondly,
each
paradigm
also
tended
to
presuppose
that
this
social
structure
was
largely
duplicated
in
those
revolutions
that
came
after;
a
fallacy
that
lead,
in
turn,
to
a
further
tendency
for
those
variations
in
facets
which
were
recognised,
to
be
judged
against
the
supposed
norm
of
the
Russian-Soviet
model.
This
paper
pursues
a
recasting
of
twentieth
century
communism
in
power
as
a
truly
global
phenomenon
in
its
origins
and
scope.
It
argues
that
by
locating
Stalinist
states
within
the
explosive
contradictions
of
uneven
and
combined
development
a
less
Eurocentric
and
more
historically
sensitive
understanding
of
the
communism
of
the
last
century
can
be
elaborated.
This
thesis
is
pursued
through
an
engagement
with
John
Kautskys
seminal,
but
all
too
often
overlooked,
The
Political
Consequences
of
Modernization,
and
the
contemporary
literature
concerned
to
creatively
re-elaborate
the
theory
of
uneven
and
combined
development.
Ludmila
Costhek
Ablio
The
rise
of
minimum
wage,
of
the
rate
of
formal
work
and
of
the
credit
to
low
income
population
has
enabled
the
Brazilian
government
to
establish
an
official
speech
and
propaganda
about
new
Brazilian
middle
class.
This
definition
is
fully
disconnected
to
work
conditions,
labour
exploitation
or
lifestyles;
on
the
other
hand,
the
celebration
of
a
new
middle
class
is
entirely
connected
to
the
consolidation
of
a
Brazilian
neodevelopment
ideology.
Based
on
an
empirical
analysis
of
the
motorcycle
couriers
in
the
City
of
Sao
Paulo
combined
with
the
analysis
of
this
official
speech,
I
discuss
the
connections
between
labour
exploitation
and
economic
development.
These
workers
annihilate
space
by
time
with
their
own
bodies,
in
a
very
risky
way.
This
very
precarious
work
which
is
typically
associated
with
this
new
middle
class
-
plays
a
key
role
to
the
realisation
of
the
demands
of
finances
and
services
that
take
place
at
the
global
city.
The
principal
aims
are:
1.To
discuss
the
disappearance
of
labour
as
a
reference
in
the
definition
of
the
so
called
new
Brazilian
middle
class;
2.
To
present
a
broader
analysis
of
the
intricate
relation
between
the
very
explicit
although
obfuscated
forms
of
labour
exploitation
and
Brazilian
development.
Emily
Cousens&
Sarah
Pine
Bill
Crane
Forces
of
Chaos
and
Anarchy:
Popular
Music,
the
New
Left
and
Social
Movements,
1966-
1972
"An
iconic
1971
poster
shows
the
faces
of
leading
Black
Panthers
Bobby
Seale
and
Huey
Newton..
The
poster
is
an
advertisement
for
an
Intercommunal
Day
of
Solidarity
as
well
as
a
birthday
celebration
for
Newton.
The
music
was
to
be
provided
by
the
Grateful
Dead.
With
some
notable
exceptions,
the
lyrical
content
and
interviews
done
with
well-known
American
and
British
rock
and
soul
musicians
seem
to
take
for
granted
that
revolution
was
around
the
corner,
unsurprising
given
that
in
1969,
over
one
million
American
students
also
self-identified
as
revolutionaries.
This
paper
aims
to
gain
an
understanding
of
the
affective
contagion
that
shaped
a
culture
in
which
revolutionary
politics
was
inseparable
from
its
musical
soundtrack.
While
much
has
been
written
about
the
connection
between
punk
culture
and
radical
politics,
there
has
been
little
by
the
way
of
analysis
of
the
similar
role
played
by
popular
music
for
the
New
Left.
It
wasnt
merely
that
young
radicals
listened
to
popular
music,
but
of
the
dialectical
reciprocity
between
the
popular
music
of
the
late
sixties
and
early
seventies
and
the
social
movements.
There
was
a
shared
community
of
belief
between
cultural
producers
and
young
radicals
that
went
beyond
simple
lyrical
content
this
was
not
protest
music,
instead
it
was
forming
a
new
subjectivity.
To
emphasize,
this
was
mass
culture
at
the
same
time
it
was
implicitly
counter-hegemonic.
Critical
engagement
in
the
underground
press
had
Marxist
writers,
notably
Robert
Christgau,
taking
popular
music
as
seriously
as
critics
continue
to
treat
literature,
film
and
social
theory.
Drawing
on
an
engagement
with
Frederic
Jameson,
Raymond
Williams
and
Jacques
Ranciere,
this
paper
aims
at
formulating
precisely
how
organic
attempts
to
develop
counter-
hegemony
through
cultural
production
occurred
in
a
historically
specific
sense.
Implicit
in
this
is
how
a
similar
counter-hegemony
can
be
developed
in
the
21st
century."
Eduardo
da
Motta
a
Albuquerque,
Joo
Antonio
de
Paula,
Hugo
Eduardo
da
Gama
Cerqueira,
Leonardo
Gomes
de
Deus
Carlos
&
Eduardo
Suprinyak
If
we
have
not
touched
the
bottom,
how
far
are
we
from
it?:
Marxs
unpublished
manuscripts
on
the
1866
crisis
"Marx's
unpublished
notebooks
on
the
1866
crisis
(the
Exzerpthefte
B108,
B109,
and
B113)
are
little
known.
In
this
paper,
we
argue
that
they
are
a
useful
source
of
information
about
his
investigations
on
the
crisis
in
general
and
its
role
in
the
capitalist
dynamics.
We
also
suggest
that
the
part
V
of
the
third
volume
of
Capital
provides
guidelines
for
reading
and
understanding
Marxs
notes
and
excerpts
in
the
notebooks.
According
to
Engels,
part
V
placed
the
greatest
difficulties
in
the
work
of
editing
the
third
volume:
not
only
it
dealt
with
the
most
complicated
subject
but
there
was
a
long
section
in
the
manuscript,
entitled
The
Confusion,
containing
nothing
but
extracts
from
parliamentary
reports
on
the
crises
of
1848
and
1857.
This
description
hints
at
the
potential
role
of
the
above-mentioned
notebooks
for
the
development
of
Marxs
argument
in
Capital:
they
may
be
seen
as
parts
of
Marx's
studies
in
view
of
the
revision
of
the
manuscript
of
the
third
volume.
To
explore
this
conjecture
we
make
a
close
reading
of
the
part
V
of
the
third
volume
of
Capital
and
its
preparatory
manuscripts
(MEGA
II.4.2
and
MEGA
II.14),
comparing
them
to
the
contents
of
those
three
notebooks."
Juan
Dal
Maso
revolution
in
20
Century.
This
way,
we
will
underline
convergences
and
differences
between
Gramscis
and
Trotskys
theories.
We
will
analize
Peter
D.
Thomas
point
of
view
about
central
role
of
theory
of
hegemony
in
Prison
Notebooks,
making
an
assessment
about
positions
of
The
Gramscian
Moment
and
those
of
the
so-called
argentinian
gramscian
intellectuals,
like
Jos
Mara
Aric
and
Juan
Carlos
Portantiero,
whose
influence
were
hegemonic
in
gramscian
studies
in
Latinamerica
many
decades;
and
last
but
not
least,
we
will
make
a
comparison
between
Gramsci
and
Trotskis
points
of
view
and
their
importance
to
a
strategic
reflection
today."
Gareth
Dale
Polanyi,
or
colonialism/growth
A
paper
that
tracks
the
origins
of
the
ideology
of
economic
growth
(alongside
that
of
the
economy
per
se),
to
the
contradictions
of
the
C17
English
mercantilistsincluding,
and
here
I
address
HMs
CfP,
their
colonial
agenda.
To
say
that
English
mercantilism
came
into
being
to
promote
the
interests
of
the
East
India
and
Royal
African
companies
would
be
to
exaggerate
but
not
by
much.
And
as
is
well
known,
the
mercantilists
sought
to
give
their
special
pleading
on
behalf
of
corporate
interests
the
appearance
of
unimpeachable
veracity
by
expressing
it
in
a
scientific
idiom.
(This
was,
after
all,
the
age
of
Bacon,
Newton,
etc.)
To
drastically
simplify
the
argument:
the
idea
of
the
self-regulating
market
emerged
as
economists
and
political
theorists
of
this
era
revised
natural
law
doctrine.
Here,
Locke,
North,
and
Barbon,
and
perhaps
Child,
are
the
crucial
figures.
The
economy
came
to
be
conceived
as
a
mechanism;
indeed,
as
the
cosmos
appears
to
a
deist.
Economy
and
cosmos
are
alike
divine
machines;
they
both
run
like
clockwork
according
to
natural
laws.
Both
require
a
benevolent
fine-tuner-ruler
(God;
government
/
the
ruling
class).
Gods
role
as
divine
watchmaker
can
pretty
straightforwardly
be
deduced,
by
superstition
posing
as
reason.
But
how
to
justify
the
analogously
divine
position
of
the
state
/
ruling
class
vis--vis
the
economy?
Here,
the
colonial
experience
was
crucialas
I
argue
in
the
rest
of
the
paper.
Katja
Daniels
Protecting
Capitalism
from
Political
Protest?
The
'Full
Protection
and
Security'
Standard
in
International
Investment
Treaties
International
investment
treaties
require
national
states
to
protect
foreign
companies
who
have
invested
within
their
territory
from
expropriation,
unfair
and
inequitable
treatment,
and
discrimination
each
of
which
has
been
interpreted
in
innovative
ways
by
the
corporate-friendly
international
investment
tribunals
that
rule
on
such
cases.
In
so
far
as
investment
treaties
place
limits
on
how
governments
can
respond
to
domestic
political
pressures,
each
of
the
above
treaty
standards
is
implicated
in
class
struggle
a
civil
society
victory
at
the
national
level
can
be
challenged
by
affected
corporations
at
the
international
level
(e.g.
Quebecs
moratorium
on
fracking
is
currently
being
challenged
as
a
breach
of
a
corporations
legitimate
expectations
to
extract
shale
gas
and
thereby
the
fair
and
equitable
treatment
standard,
while
Australias
and
Uruguays
tobacco
plain
packaging
regulations
are
being
challenged
as
indirect
expropriations
of
a
tobacco
companys
intellectual
property).
However,
there
is
one
particular
treaty
standard
that
has
recently
attracted
the
attention
of
companies,
and
that
has
the
potential
to
more
directly
interfere
with
the
political
activities
of
anti-capitalist
movements.
Corporations
have
recently
brought
a
number
of
multi-million
dollar
legal
cases
against
states
for
their
alleged
failures
to
afford
corporations
full
protection
and
security
from
adverse
social
demonstrations
and
direct
action
protests
that
have
targeted
their
operations.
As
such,
they
have
invoked
the
full
protection
and
security
standard
to
protect
themselves
not
from
government
action
motivated
by
domestic
political
pressures
(as
do
the
other
treaty
standards),
but
directly
from
the
civil
society
protestors
themselves.
It
is
still
uncertain
what
precisely
this
legal
standard
demands
of
states,
but
this
paper
suggests
that
the
political
implications
of
this
clause
may
well
precede
any
legal
consequences
the
threat
of
such
lawsuits
may
themselves
incentivise
states
to
strike
down
on
protests.
Brecht
De
Smet
"This
paper
explores
the
Gramscian
concept
of
Caesarism
(quantitative
and
qualitative,
progressive
and
reactionary)
and
its
relevance
for
understanding
the
current
process
of
revolution
and
restoration
in
Egypt.
First,
attention
is
paid
to
conceptual
relations
between
Caesarism
and,
on
the
one
hand,
traditional
Marxist
notions
such
as
Bonapartism
and
populism,
and,
on
the
other,
Gramscian
concepts
such
as
passive
revolution,
hegemony,
and
historical
bloc.
Similarities,
differences,
and
problems
of
interpretation
are
accentuated.
Subsequently,
the
contemporary
political
process,
especially
the
role
of
the
military
and
the
position
of
(former)
Field
Marshal
al-Sissi,
is
framed
within
Egypt's
historical
trajectory,
refracturing
the
Nasserist
episode
and
the
transformations
that
followed
it
through
the
prism
of
Gramsci's
concepts
of
Caesarism
and
passive
revolution.
Finally,
the
discussion
returns
to
Gramsci,
concluding
that
the
concept
of
Caesarism
operates
in
two
interconnected
domains.
(1)
In
the
field
of
class
politics,
strategy,
and
hegemony
it
refers
to
a
botched
process
of
popular
subject
constitution
-
a
degenerated
Modern
Prince.
In
this
tradition,
Caesarism
is
linked
to
such
concepts
as
""substitutionism""
(Trotsky)
and
""octroyal
socialism""
(Draper).
(2)As
a
political-economic
category
it
deals
with
a
specific
mode
of
state
formation
and/or
reconfiguration
of
a
historical
bloc.
Here
the
concept
is
closer
to
Cox's
classical
interpretation
of
Caesarism
as
the
""instrumentality
of
passive
revolution"",
although
it
is
argued
that
it
cannot
be
fully
subsumed
by
the
latter
notion."
Lvia
de
Cssia
Godoi
Moraes
Financialization
as
a
response
to
crisis:
the
case
of
EMBRAER
S.A.
This
article
summarizes
the
results
of
my
thesis
about
the
increase
of
the
financialization
of
the
biggest
aeronautic
enterprise
in
Brazil:
Embraer
S.A.
Embraer
was
created
in
a
context
of
military
dictatorship,
as
part
of
the
international
division
of
labor
and
the
condition
of
Brazilian
dependence,
in
the
context
of
the
structural
crisis
of
capital
in
the
1970s.
Over
four
decades
of
existence,
it
has
sought
responses
to
the
crisis
for
not
being
crashed.
The
company
was
privatized
in
1994
under
the
implementation
of
neoliberal
policies.
Since
then,
many
changes
have
been
implemented,
characterized
by
the
globalization
of
capital
with
the
prevalence
of
the
fictitious
capital
accumulation.
According
to
our
studies,
fictitious
capital
and
productive
capital
are
deeply
related.
The
research
also
demonstrated
that
the
more
the
capital
is
sprayed,
the
more
it
intensifies
the
use
of
the
workforce's
labor
through
organizational
change,
outsourcing
and
imposing
standards
of
corporate
governance,
reorganization
of
the
company's
layout,
changes
in
the
types
of
hiring,
internalization
of
toyotists
standards
behavioral,
etc.
Moreover,
we
intended
to
point
out
the
contradictions
of
these
movements
that
directly
impact
the
company
workers,
always
having
as
perspective
of
analyses
the
relationship
between
the
particularity
of
EMBRAER
and
the
social
totality.
Simona
Bertazzi
capitalistic
restructuring
within
social
reproduction,
where
this
constitutes
ground
for
a
new
original
accumulation
that
produces
impoverishment
and
exploitation.
At
the
same
time
we
assume
the
ambiguity
of
reproductive
relationships
and
activities
in
order
to
develop
antagonistic
practices."
Jodi
Dean
The
Party
Critiques
of
the
party
in
terms
of
agreement
or
schism
remain
at
the
level
of
the
imaginary;
the
party
is
nothing
but
a
figure
of
egoism
and
competition.
But
the
symbolic
dimension
of
the
party,
its
form
as
a
place
from
which
communists
assess
themselves
and
their
actions,
is
what
matters.
This
paper
looks
at
communist
lives
for
evidence
of
the
symbolic
effect
of
the
communist
party.
In
what
ways
did
the
party
make
itself
felt
as
a
place
from
which
communists
looked
at
themselves
and
their
settings?
Instead
of
focusing
on
classic
texts,
figures,
and
events,
I
consider
instead
narratives
from
everyday
experiences
of
rank
and
file
members
in
the
CPUSA
and
CPGB.
I
look
to
examples
from
these
parties
because
of
their
weakness.
The
US
and
UK
are
neither
party
states
nor
parliamentary
systems
where
communists
have
ever
had
much
electoral
success.
Even
in
the
1930s
and
1940s
when
the
communist
party
was
at
its
strongest
in
the
US
and
UK,
actual
political
power
was
out
of
reach.
In
the
twentieth
century,
neither
country
has
appeared
on
the
brink
of
revolution,
but
instead
has
encountered
a
mix
of
de-radicalizing
middle
class
prosperity,
working
class
defeat,
and
capitalist
aggression,
not
to
mention
the
intense
anti-
communism
of
the
Cold
War.
How,
then,
under
conditions
even
Moscow
agreed
were
far
from
revolutionarily
ripe,
did
a
communist
sensibility
endure?
What
enabled
the
communist
party
to
provide
a
location
from
which
members
in
the
US
and
UK
could
see
their
actions
as
valuable
and
worthwhile
and
that
even
non-members
could
and
would
adopt?
My
claim
is
that
the
affective
infrastructure
of
the
party
provided
the
material
support
for
its
symbolic
location.
So
instead
of
considering
the
communist
party
in
terms
of
ideology,
program,
leadership,
or
organizational
structure,
I
am
approaching
it
in
terms
of
its
affective
capacities,
the
dynamics
of
feeling
it
generated
and
mobilized.
William
Dixon
Development,
Consolidation
and
the
Commodity
This
paper
sets
out
an
understanding
of
how
capitalism
survived
by
examining
the
changing
conditions
of
the
system
within
the
context
of
Britain.
The
limit
of
such
an
approach
is
that
it
examines
a
global
system
within
a
non-global
confine.
Nevertheless
it
is
a
confine
of
some
importance
to
the
development
and
survival
of
capitalism.
If
the
global
system
were
to
prosper
it
had,
arguably,
to
survive
in
the
UK.
In
addition
in
examining
how
it
survived
we
must
do
so
in
terms
of
characteristics
that
define
the
nature
of
a
capitalist
system.
The
paper
examines
the
emergence
of
a
bourgeois
society
in
terms
of
the
characteristics
of
the
commodity
and
so
how
struggle
and
consolidation
must
both
be
shaped
within
that
space,
leading
to
new
forms
of
struggle
and
consolidation.
These
issues
are
investigated
through
the
works
of
leading
theorists
and
reformers
to
show
a
coherent
line
of
development
that,
it
is
argued,
prefigure
developments
within
globalisation.
Caglar
Dolek
&
Deniz
Parlak
of
concern.
This
paper
looks
at
the
basis
for
these
differences
and
considers
the
broader
question
as
to
whether
they
represent
a
radical
shift
in
the
balance
of
bargaining
power,
particularly
since
the
onset
of
the
Great
Recession.
It
examines
whether
they
indicate
an
escalation
of
the
pursuit
of
labour
market
flexibility,
but
also
questions
whether
the
wider
process
of
flexibilisation
would
be
assisted
by
the
broader
adoption
of
Zero
Hours
Contracts.
By
focusing
on
Zero
Hours
Contracts
this
paper
will
contribute
to
the
wider
discussion
of
precarity.
Susana
Draper
The
state
and
the
common
--
re
thinking
the
scope
of
political
change
in
the
Latin
American
present
In
the
past
decades,
there
has
been
a
constant
tension
between
the
language
of
"social
(political)
movements"
and
the
language
of
the
State.
However,
some
of
the
questions
that
this
conflict
arises
relate
to
the
main
points
of
discussion
among
heterodox
Marxists
in
the
1970s,
a
moment
in
which
the
language
of
change
was
starting
to
problematize
the
relationship
between
"revolution"
and
the
takeover
of
the
State.
This
paper
proposes
a
dialogue
between
those
issues
as
they
were
posed
in
the
past
and
present
taking
Bolivia
as
a
problematic
nucleus
from
where
to
envisage
the
way
in
which
the
State
and
the
common
pose
a
new
political
language
to
approach
the
notion
of
"social
change".
Richard
Drayton
The
1914-45
period
represents
a
fundamental
period
of
crisis
in
this
regime
of
global
domination
on
the
one
hand,
and
of
white
collective
privilege
on
the
other.
The
Russian
and
Chinese
revolutions,
and
the
age
of
decolonisation
appeared
to
break
apart
that
European-
centred
world
order.
But
even
as
the
formal
European
empires
disintegrated,
that
nucleus
of
'white'
solidarity,
remained
at
the
heart
of
the
West's
Cold
War
coalition,
informing
the
politics
of
anti-communism
and
economic
and
security
cooperation.
Strikingly
also
since
1989,
there
has
been
a
self-conscious
attempt
to
consolidate
the
'white
international'
around
United
States
hegemony,
with
ideas
such
as
the
'anglosphere',
and
the
association
of
anglo-american
political
and
economic
norms
with
the
gold
standard
for
human
rights
and
economic
freedom,
underlying
the
neo-liberal
global
order.
To
this
extent,
the
West's
coalition
wars
in
Afghanistan,
Iraq,
and
Libya
need
to
be
understand
in
terms
of
the
internal
dynamics
of
this
ultra-imperial
combine.
The
ascent
of
the
'white
international'
had
a
material
foundation:
the
gap
in
economic
and
military
power
between
the
West
and
the
rest
which
opened
up
with
industrialization.
Its
more
recent
reconfigurations
take
place
in
the
context
of
the
relative
industrial
decline
of
the
ultra-imperial
core.
Since
the
1970s,
the
solution
found
by
the
United
States
to
this
lay
in
financialisation,
and
its
command,
in
the
midst
of
'liberalized'
economies,
of
the
goods,
services
and
savings.
Such
command
has
always
been
premised
by
strategic
hegemony,
and
the
militarism
of
our
own
age
is
linked
to
this
attempt
to
translate
military
and
intelligence
power
into
economic
dominance.
The
transnational
racial
formations
ordered
by
eighteenth-
and
nineteenth-century
European
imperialism
continue
thus
in
hidden
ways
to
shape
the
organisation
of
twenty-first
century
capitalism,
even
in
the
midst
of
the
ascent
of
China.
Pace
Kautsky,
the
ultra-imperial
path
leads
also
to
perpetual
war."
Devi
Dumbadze
disenchantment
of
the
world,
it
is
nevertheless
the
foretoken
of
what
a
redeemed
life
-
one
without
the
constraint
of
labor
would
be."
Cdric
Durand
This
contribution
examines
the
role
of
fictitious
capital
in
the
contemporary
financialisation
and
in
the
aftermath
of
the
2008
financial
crisis.
A
first
section
proposes
a
brief
genealogy
of
this
concept
and
explicits
the
subtle
intermediary
position
of
Marx
on
this
issue,
between
Austrian
eocnomists,
on
the
one
hand,
and
keynesian
and
(neo)chartists,
on
the
other
hand.
A
second
section
presents
some
stylized
facts
accounting
for
the
rise
of
this
category
since
the
seventies
for
the
the
main
high
income
economies.
The
elementary
forms
of
fictitious
capital
(credit
to
the
private
sector,
public
debt
and
market
capitalization)
are
distinguished
from
the
sophisticated
forms
which
have
surged
in
the
recent
period
(derivatives
and
shadow
banking).
A
third
section
specifies
the
relevance
of
this
category
in
the
conendrum
of
financial
profits,
i.e.
its
relation
to
capital
gains,
levy
of
domestic
non-financial
profits,
capture
of
the
gains
of
unequal
exchange
and
profits
from
alienation.
The
fourth
section
tries
to
assess
its
impact
on
the
survival
of
capitalism
and
points
to
the
related
mechanisms
of
socioeconomic
violence
by
the
state
in
the
direct
form
of
dispossessive
auteritarian
policies
and
indirect
forms
of
orthodox
and
unorthodox
central
banks
'Lender
of
last
resort'
policies.
Hester
Eisenstein
It
is
crucial
for
Marxist
Feminists
to
unmask
the
uses
of
this
form
of
feminism,
and
to
restore
the
role
of
feminist
ideology
to
its
rightful
place
as
a
partner
and
friendly
critic
of
Marxist
analysis
and
practice."
Maria
Elisa
Cevasco
"One
key,
but
neglected,
source
of
environmental
pollution
is
agriculture.
14%
of
emissions
come
from
agricultural
production
and
a
further
17%
of
emissions
are
from
changing
land
use
and
forestry
(IPCC,
2007).
Modern
agriculture
is
dominated
in
the
developed
world
by
big-business,
which
relies
on
heavy
use
of
chemicals,
intensive
mono-cropped
farming
and
over-reliance
of
technology
-
the
art
of
turning
oil
into
food
(Foster,
2010)
and
is
closely
linked
to
the
imposition
of
neo-liberal
policies
on
the
developing
world,
encouraging
agriculture
for
the
market,
not
for
the
hungry.
Left
wing
literature
on
the
potential
for
rational
or
sustainable
agriculture
frequently
draws
on
the
experience
of
radical-agrarian
movements
in
the
developing
world.
All
too
often
this
literature
concentrates
on
the
benefits
of
small
farms
versus
agri-business
(eg
Magdoff
&
Tokar,
2010;
Bello
,
2009;
Klingzell-Brulin
&
Brulin,
2010);
in
this
they
reflect
more
liberal
views
such
as
those
(eg
Tudge,
2011)
who
argue
for
small-scale
farming
under
a
reformed
capitalism.
Small-scale
farming
under
capitalism
can
offer
benefits
over
multinational
driven
agriculture
such
as
improved
yields,
better
resilience
to
environmental
changes
and
natural
disasters
and
reduced
reliance
on
pesticides
and
chemicals).
Yet
small-
scale
agriculture
is
limited
by
a
range
of
problems
associated
with
peasant
production
particularly
the
limited
use
of
technology
and
the
highly
labour-intensive
work
-
and
is
associated
with
patterns
of
seasonal
labour
amongst
a
wider
agrarian
work
force
(Bernstein,
2010).
Equally
there
are
powerful
reasons
why
we
should
be
critical
of
large-scale
capitalist
agriculture
(Magdoff
&
Tokar,
2010;
Bello,
2009;
Empson
2014).
This
question
of
agriculture
in
a
post-capitalist
society
was
debated
in
the
aftermath
of
the
Russian
Revolution,
as
well
as
by
earlier
writers
in
the
Marxist
tradition
(eg
Kautsky,
1899),
and
it
remains
relevant
today.
However
within
the
Communist
tradition,
from
the
late
1920s,
socialist
agriculture
was
often
viewed
as
synonymous
with
industrialised
collective
farming,
ignoring
real
advantages
associated
with
peasants
working
their
own
land.
In
this
paper
I
argue
that
Marxism
allows
a
critique
of
agriculture
under
capitalism
and
a
vision
of
the
transition
to
a
genuine
socialist
agriculture
avoiding
either
a
crude
position
of
supporting
collective
industrial
farming
or
a
romantic
view
of
small-scale
production
as
a
solution
to
environmental
crisis
and
food
production.
I
will
outline
an
alternative
that
suggests
that
gains
by
agrarian
movements
could
lead
to
a
radically
different
vision
of
agriculture
based
on
the
experience
of
a
rural
peasantry
in
a
wider
socialist
economy.
But
in
the
first
instance
this
means
peasants
and
rural
workers
seizing
land
and
farms
and
redistributing
land,
and
likely,
though
not
inevitably,
giving
private
farms
a
new
lease
of
life.
In
the
longer
term
it
will
mean
a
gradual
transition
towards
collective
agriculture.
Socialist
prosperity...
in
the
very
long
run
[will]
persuade
the
peasantry
to
give
up
their
individual
farms.
(Cliff,
1964)
Only
this
can
offer
the
potential
to
feed
seven
billion
people
in
a
sustainable
way."
Sai
Englert
bureaucracy
(1948-1984);
and
thirdly,
the
neoliberal
period
in
which
the
Israeli
bourgeoisie,
supported
by
US
imperialism,
rose
to
political
dominance
(post
1984).
The
paper
will
focus
on
changing
class
relationships
within
Zionism,
as
well
as
the
shifting
relationship
between
Israel
and
Western
imperialism.
It
will
also
highlight
the
continuities
in
the
overarching
political
project
of
expansion
and
ethnic
cleansing
throughout
the
periods
discussed."
Ertan
Erol
Esfahlani
State and Crisis of Overproduction: the Case of Film Industry in 1970s Iran
In
order
to
investigate
how
capitalism
survives,
it
would
be
helpful
to
consider
the
ways
through
which
capitalism
is
rescued
from
a
serious
crisis.
This
paper
will
concentrate
on
the
role
of
the
state
to
rescue
the
capitalist
mode
of
production
from
the
crisis
of
over-
production.
It
examines
the
industry
of
cinema
in
the
1970s
in
Iran
when
the
uncontrollable
drive
for
more
profit
by
the
private
sector
lead
the
industry
into
the
crisis
of
over-producing
films.
In
order
to
argue
this
process,
firstly,
I
will
explain
the
political
economy
of
cinema
in
this
period.
Secondly,
I
will
discuss
the
intervention
of
state
in
the
crisis
in
order
to
diversify
the
film
texts
and
find
new
markets
for
them.
This
was
an
opportunity
which
the
independent
and
radical
filmmakers
attempted
to
take
up
to
produce
critical
and
avant-
guard
film.
Accordingly,
it
lead
to
the
production
of
films
known
as
Iranian
New
Wave
cinema.
Thirdly,
I
will
explore
the
reasons
why
the
state
intervention
was
not
successful
to
survive
the
industry
as
the
domestic
production
collapsed
by
the
end
of
1970s.
Teppo
Eskelinen
Possibilities
and
limits
of
green
Keynesianism
The
paper
on
"Possibilities
and
limits
of
green
Keynesianism"
discusses
to
what
extent
issues
of
equality
and
sustainability
can
be
addressed
by
economic
policy
measures
based
on
public
investment
and
fiscal
stimulus.
It
seems
possible
to
design
a
social
investment
programme
directed
at
achieving
both
full
employment
and
a
more
environmentally
sustainable
social
order.
Yet
there
are
two
lines
of
serious
counter-arguments
against
this
scenario.
First,
one
can
question
whether
a
sustainability
strategy
implying
consumption
growth
is
doomed
to
fail;
second,
it
needs
to
be
noted
that
the
strategy
is
based
on
naturalizing
employment
relations
rather
than
treating
them
as
power
structures,
which
leaves
major
social
inequalities
intact.
From
this
basis,
the
chapter
discusses,
to
what
extent
hopes
should
be
given
for
a
"green
Keynesian"
strategy.
Danny
Evans
this
paper.
But,
how
far
can
the
comparison
with
Third
Period
Communism
be
taken,
and
to
what
extent
does
it
rely
on
the
assumed
virtues
and
effectiveness
of
a
broad
anti-fascist
front?
Here,
I
intend
to
explore
these
questions
and
to
look
again
at
anarchist
voluntarism
in
1930s
Spain
in
the
context
of
anti-fascism
as
it
was
then
conceived."
Jessica
Evans
Feenberg
contradictions;
on
the
other
hand,
philosophy
cannot
resolve
the
problems
it
identifies
because
only
social
revolution
can
eliminate
their
social
causes.
I
call
this
a
metacritical
argument.
I
argue
that
metacritique
in
this
sense
underlies
the
philosophy
of
praxis
and
can
still
inform
our
thinking
about
social
and
philosophical
transformation.
The
various
projections
of
such
transformations
distinguish
the
four
philosophers
discussed
in
this
paper.
They
also
differ
on
the
path
to
social
change.
They
develop
the
metacritical
argument
under
the
specific
historical
conditions
in
which
they
find
themselves.
Differences
in
these
conditions
explain
much
of
the
difference
between
them,
especially
since
philosophy
of
praxis
depends
on
a
historical
circumstancethe
more
or
less
plausible
revolutionary
resolution
of
the
problems
at
the
time
they
are
writing."
Ruth
Felder
From
the
pink
tide
to
new
developmentalism:
recreating
the
conditions
for
capital
accumulation
in
South
America
"In
the
2000s,
the
coming
to
power
of
left
and
centre
left
governments
in
South
America
and
the
accompanying
challenges
to
the
basic
tenets
of
the
neoliberal
orthodoxy
raised
widespread
attention.
Many
analyses
have
focused
on
the
nature
of
the
new
political
leaders
in
the
region,
their
relation
to
social
movements,
the
challenges
to
the
US
and
the
anti-imperalist
nature
of
this
left
turn.
As
these
experiences
have
been
ridden
with
conflict
and
contradictions,
some
critics
have
stressed
the
lack
of
political
will
of
most
governments
to
deliver
on
hopes
while
others
have
pointed
at
the
external
intrusion
in
domestic
politics
in
the
most
radical
experiments
and
the
US's
attempts
to
regain
control
over
the
region.
Less
attention
has
been
paid
to
the
nature
of
the
historical
development
pattern
that
followed
the
crisis
of
neoliberalism
in
the
region.
The
study
of
the
this
development
pattern
is
central
to
understand
the
scope
and
limitations
to
the
recent
South
American
post-
neoliberal
experiments
and
interpret
its
contradictions,
conflicts
and
prospects.
Building
on
debates
on
the
nature
of
the
South
American
new-developmentalism
and
post-
liberal
regionalism,
the
role
of
the
states
in
them
and
the
international
insertion
of
the
countries
of
the
region
as
commodity
exporters,
this
paper
will
argue
that
the
very
active
economic
intervention
of
the
states
of
the
region
and
the
recent
forms
of
regional
cooperation
going
beyond
free
trade
and
liberalization
have
been
part
of
a
process
of
internationalization
of
the
region's
economies
and
states
and
have
involved
the
recreation
of
the
conditions
for
capital
accumulation
after
the
debacle
of
neoliberal
reforms.
The
paper
will
pay
special
attention
to
the
building
of
regional
arrangements
and
other
mechanisms
of
regional
cooperation
associated
to
it
(namely,
MERCOSUR,
UNASUR,
IIRSA
and
CELAC)
and
will
locate
them
in
the
context
of
the
balances
of
forces
and
patterns
of
capital
accumulation
that
underlie
them."
Mariano
Fliz
Felli
current
goal
of
international
environmental
politics
is
directed
less
towards
the
avoidance
or
mitigation
of
environmental
changes,
than
towards
creating
the
conditions
in
which
individuals,
regions,
socio-ecological
systems,
even
States,
could
not
only
cope
with
this
change,
but
actually
reinforce
the
accumulation
of
capital.
This
new
productive
way
of
conceiving
society-environmental
relations
is
predicated
on
the
concept
of
"resilience"
as
an
politico-ethical
norm.
Alexandre
Feron
The
object
of
my
paper
is
to
present
Sartres
theory
of
class
in
his
"Critique
of
Dialectical
Reason"
and
to
show
in
what
way
it
is
a
contribution
to
Marxist
theory.
Indeed
when
dealing
with
class,
Marxism
often
hesitates
between
an
objectivist
and
a
subjectivist
conception
(class
is
determined
by
position
in
social
productive
relations
or
by
class
consciousness
which
is
a
product
of
class
struggle).
I
would
like
to
show
how
the
concepts
that
Sartre
develops
in
CDR
(class
as
class-being,
as
a
collective,
as
a
group,
as
an
institution,
as
a
praxis-process),
far
from
making
him
a
subjectivist,
help
to
articulate
these
two
dimensions.
I
intend
therefore
to
propose
a
systematic
reconstruction
of
Sartres
theory
of
class.
More
broadly,
I
would
like
to
show
the
importance
of
Sartres
attempt
to
set
the
foundations
for
an
anthropologie
structurale
et
historique
and
its
relevance
today
for
the
elaboration
of
Marxist
social
sciences.
Robert
FIne
Semblance
and
substance:
Marx's
critique
of
the
legal
forms
of
capitalist
society
My
review
of
Marxs
critique
of
the
legal
forms
of
capitalist
society
tests
the
following
proposition:
that
the
critique
of
law
is
not
the
same
as
the
trashing
of
law
and
that
they
should
rather
be
seen
as
opposites.
Whilst
trashing
has
as
its
end
the
devaluation
of
law,
usually
by
demonstrating
the
chasm
between
the
concept
of
universal
legal
equality
and
the
actuality
of
concealed
material
interests,
the
critique
of
law
has
as
its
end
the
revaluation
of
law,
usually
by
way
of
understanding
both
its
downfall
and
the
conditions
of
its
reconstruction.
My
case
is
that
Marx
was
equivocal
in
his
critique
of
law,
but
is
better
read
on
the
side
of
critique,
not
trashing.
Indeed,
exposing
the
limits
of
a
form
of
radicalism
that
substitutes
trashing
law
for
critique
of
law,
was
a
pivotal
part
of
his
juridical
writings.
Hostility
to
rights,
law
and
the
state
are
enduring
elements
of
all
radical
traditions,
since
it
expresses
the
sense
of
revulsion
thinking
people
should
feel
over
the
gulf
between
the
rights
society
espouses
and
the
violence
it
is
capable
of
practising.
However,
Marx
both
inherited
and
gave
rise
to
an
anti-totalitarian
current
of
critical
theory
in
which
the
semblance
of
freedom,
equality
and
solidarity
present
in
capitalist
legal
forms
is
far
from
discounted.
In
my
presentation
my
main
reference
point
will
be
Marxs
own
texts,
though
I
shall
not
have
time
to
put
forward
the
supporting
evidence,
which
is
already
published
in
a
number
of
books
and
articles.
What
I
shall
argue
why
it
remain
as
urgent
today
as
it
was
in
Marxs
day
to
recognise,
recover
and
reconstruct
the
juridical
aspects
of
capital-critique.
Elmar
Flatschart
Does
the
commodity
form
really
die?
A
Comparison
of
Robert
Kurz
and
Michael
Heinrichs
answers
to
questions
of
crisis
theory.
Crisis
Theory
is
probably
one
of
Marxist
Critiques
most
contested
terrains.
While
for
a
long
time,
disputes
over
the
extent
and
quality
of
Capitalisms
crisis
drive
had
the
character
of
a
niche
problem,
they
certainly
gained
importance
with
the
factuality
of
actually
existing
crisis
phenomena
since
2007/8.
Old
disputes
do
however
remain.
In
the
German
debate,
one
argument
over
Crisis
Theory
that
predates
the
actual
crisis
can
be
traced
to
the
opposition
of
two
currents
that
share
a
common
background
and
are
often
mixed
up:
the
Neue
Marx
Lektre
(New
Marx
Reading)
and
Wertkritik
(value
critique).
While
Neue
Marx
Lektre
authors,
who
focused
an
academic
and
often
philological
close
reading
of
Marx,
tended
to
argue
against
all
historical
thesis
advancing
an
internal
rupture
in
the
core
of
the
ideal
average
of
Capitalism,
Wertkritik
propounded
a
rather
bold
and
bulky
corpus
of
theorems
arguing
for
a
terminal
systemic
crisis
of
Capital
that
stems
from
its
internal
contradictions.
In
my
presentation
I
want
to
give
a
basic
overview
of
both
approachs
background,
their
central
thesis
and
the
different
answers
to
questions
of
crisis
theory.
In
this,
I
want
to
highlight
the
advantages
and
disadvantages
of
the
two
opposing
currents,
focussing
on
the
work
of
two
well-known
proponents,
Michael
Heinrich
on
the
one
and
Robert
Kurz
on
the
other
side.
This
can
build
on
existing
material,
as
both
authors
directly
or
indirectly
referred
to
each
other
in
controversial
discussions
on
the
character
and
scope
of
Marx
crisis
and
value-theory.
I
will
maintain
that
Michael
Heinrichs
arguments
are
sound
when
it
comes
to
the
explanation
of
a
certain
immanent
type
of
crisis
of
more
or
less
limited
economic
character.
It
however
fails
in
terms
of
ontological
and
epistemological
desiderata
when
it
comes
to
taking
the
step
from
economic
analysis
to
critique
of
(political)
economy
and
further
on
to
critique
of
society.
It
can
be
shown
that
Heinrichs
approach
harbours
a
hidden
scientist
reductionism
when
it
comes
to
contextualising
central
categories
of
materialist
critique,
which
ultimately
limits
the
range
of
his
crisis
theory.
I
will
further
argue
that
the
framework
proposed
by
Wertkritik
unfolds
greater
theoretical
potential
by
overcoming
a
strictly
economist
perspective,
opening
the
field
for
a
more
integral
critical
theory
of
society
that
goes
beyond
Marx
(while
none
the
less
building
on
him).
Notwithstanding,
there
are
copious
theoretical
problems
to
be
resolved
as
many
of
the
central
thesis
are
far
from
being
well
elaborated
and
remain
to
be
expanded
and
empirically
tested.
Problems
and
open
questions
will
be
presented
by
drawing
on
Kurz
latest
book
Geld
ohne
Wert
(Money
without
value)."
Chris
Ford
Fowler
is
also
segmented
by
class,
ethnicity
and
race,
nationality
and
region,
among
other
factors
(Mills,
2003:
42).
While
domestic
substitutes
shape
and
reshape
gender,
class
and
racial
hierarchies,
the
employment
of
the
domestic
substitutes
has
not
altered
womens
relation
to
capitalism.
As
I
will
show,
what
remains
unchanged
is
the
unequal
distribution
of
caretaking
activities
women
continues
to
experience
within
the
private
sphere
and
the
expectations
of
women
as
productive
workers
in
the
public
sphere.
Offered
in
this
paper
is
an
analysis
of
the
ways
in
which
relation
of
inequality
is
structured
by
reinforcement
of
and
reproduction
of
ideologies
on
gender,
race,
and
class.
This
is
because
such
hierarchies
also
interact
with
ideological
channels
in
the
allocations
of
societal
resources
such
as
power
and
authority
to
ensure
the
maintaining
of
unequal
power
relations
in
the
gender,
race,
and
class
hierarchies.
International
capital,
as
a
result
of
this
interaction,
has
been
able
to
recruit
and
discipline
workers,
to
reproduce
and
cheapen
segmented
labor
forces
within
and
across
national
borders
(Mills,
2003;
see
also
Enloe
1989,
Ong,
1991,
Safa
1995)."
Carl
Freedman
"This
paper
intends
to
present
how
the
ecuadorian-mexican
philospher
Bolvar
Echeverra
has
characterized
our
epoch
as
a
time
of
crisis,
not
only
for
the
consequences
of
the
global
depression
or
the
questions
of
the
economic
model
around
the
world,
but
he
believes
that,
without
denying
the
effects
of
the
economic
and
the
political
crisis,
this
other
crisis
is
below
both,
on
a
deeper
level.
It
is
a
crisis
of
more
far-reaching
and
irreversible
consequences,
as
it
puts
into
question
not
the
effectiveness
or
viability
of
a
particular
political
project
or
the
growth
of
a
nation,
but
the
grounds
on
which
is
built
the
mode
of
reproduction
of
human
life
in
all
its
dimensions.
It
is
a
crisis
that
afflicts
humanity
as
a
whole,
in
a
world
in
which
the
spread
of
the
capitalist
system
has
reconfigured
in
ways
and
to
varying
degrees,
both
the
totality
of
social
relations,
as
the
archaic
ways
of
relating
to
the
natural
environment
.
Modernity
in
its
capitalist
form,
says
Echeverria,
by
subsuming
in
his
totalizing
dynamic
all
the
old
forms
of
identity
configuration
and
policy
coordination
has
created
a
kind
of
unique
story
or
destination
unprecedented.
Therefore
this
form
of
crisis
resembles
more
a
collapse
of
the
entire
civilized
project
in
which
modernity
is
founded."
Eirini
Gaitanou
An
examination
of
class
structure
in
Greece,
its
tendencies
of
transformation
amid
the
crisis,
and
its
impacts
on
the
organisational
forms
and
structures
of
the
social
movement
The
study
of
the
Greek
class
structure
is
necessary
for
approaching
and
understanding
the
forms
and
structures
of
the
labour
and
social
movement
in
Greece.
The
class
structure
and
the
specific
characteristics
of
the
Greek
social
formation
present
special
features
compared
to
other
developed
capitalist
countries
of
Europe.
These
features
have
historically
resulted
to
the
appearance
of
broader
petty-bourgeois
strata,
in
parallel
to
(and
not
competitively
to)
capitalist
development.
The
tendency
in
the
last
twenty
years
(during
the
restructuring
process)
has
been
the
expansion
of
capital
into
new
areas
and
sectors
of
capitalist
circulation,
leading
to
the
establishment
of
a
range
of
services
as
capitalist
commodities,
and
an
expansion
of
unproductive,
but
necessary
for
the
realisation
of
the
surplus-value,
activities
(expanded
reproduction
of
capitalism).
Further,
during
the
current
crisis,
we
are
witnessing
a
massive
job
destruction,
along
with
a
significant
tendency
of
class
polarisation
and
violent
proletarianisation
of
the
petty-bourgeois
strata.
Massive
unemployment
and
precarious
work
are
largely
expanded,
whilst
the
stable
work
model
is
eroded.
This
reality
affects
both
the
emergence
and
the
forms
of
organisation
of
the
labor
and
social
movement.
The
working
class
is
highly
fragmented
and
heterogeneous,
and
the
trade
union
movement
has
several
weaknesses
and
pecularities.
At
the
same
time,
large
sections
of
the
working
strata
cannot
be
expressed
through
the
traditional
trade
unionism,
because
of
conjunctural
and
structural
reasons.
Thus,
there
appear
various
forms
of
organisation
that
are
beyond
the
scope
of
the
traditional
labor
movement.
The
aim
of
this
paper
is
to
explore
this
landscape
and
the
various
possibilities
open
to
collective
action,
its
forms
and
manifestations
at
the
political
level.
Lucia Gallardo
Compensation for keeping fossil fuels in the soil: From within and outside Capitalism
"Ecuador
was
the
first
country
to
propose
keeping
oil
in
the
soil
in
exchange
for
a
partial
compensation
in
order
to
make
a
transition
to
a
post-extractivist
economy.
Keeping
fossil
fuels
in
the
soil
has
been
taken
into
consideration
more
recently
in
the
academia
as
an
effective
measure
to
stop
global
warming,
but
the
issue
of
compensation
has
not
had
a
significant
impact
on
the
political
debate.
This
paper
discusses
such
a
compensation
scheme
in
the
context
of
two
globally
accepted
scarcities:
the
carbon
sink
and
the
non-capitalist
development
opportunities.
The
central
argument
is
that
compensation
for
non-extraction
opens
a
new
way
to
look
at
combating
climate
change
and
provides
a
non-market,
politicized
method
of
assessing
its
stakes.
How
does
compensation
transform
our
thinking
about
combating
climate
change?
It
recognizes
that
developing
countries
are
engaged
in
an
unequal
international
division
of
labor;
in
order
to
overcome
their
dependency,
compensation
might
create
(at
least
partially)
the
material
basis
for
an
energetic
transition.
Additionally,
compensation
does
not
reproduce
capitalist
form
of
exchange
in
terms
of
nature
valuation;
therefore,
such
scheme
is
challenging
the
carbon
trade
system
by
unveiling
its
fictitious
nature.
In
political
terms,
compensation
is
the
result
of
a
long-term
collective
action
of
people
who
consider
climate
change
as
the
result
of
power
relations
mediated
by
new
imperialisms,
including
the
ecological
one.
Finally,
based
on
the
principles
of
climate
justice,
compensation
as
a
transnational
scheme
will
allow
an
unprecedented
re-
distribution
of
global
wealth.
Maryanne
Galvo
Kaika
"The
paper
aims
to
expand
the
theoretical
framework
within
which
we
examine
mortgage
debt,
by
focusing
on
the
role
that
mortgages
play
not
only
in
financialising
housing,
but
also
in
promoting
a
biopolitics
of
financialising
life
itself.
Conceptualising
mortgages
as
a
technology
of
power
over
life
(Foucault
2003,
246),
we
expose
the
biopolitics
linked
to
mortgaged
homeownership
in
order
to
broaden
the
scope
of
analysis
on
the
dialectics
between
the
production
of
biological
futures
and
the
production
of
future
profits.
Our
analysis
is
grounded
in
a
historical
geographical
examination
of
the
biopolitics
of
mortgage
debt
in
Spain,
where,
during
the
most
recent
real
estate
boom
(1997-2007),
mortgages
were
employed
as
a
technique
that
was
supposed
to
optimise
income
by
enrolling
livelihoods
into
the
cycle
of
real
estate
speculation.
But
as
800,000
mortgages
per
year
were
issued
as
average
wages
fell
by
10
per
cent,
mortgages
also
became
a
punitive/disciplinary
technique,
which
made
the
population
itself
the
object
of
financial
speculation.
Whilst
livelihoods
became
closely
connected
to
the
rent
extraction
mechanisms
of
global
finance,
their
very
existence
followed
the
fluctuation
of
financial
markets
with
disastrous
effects,
including
the
eviction
of
over
200,000
Spanish
families
from
their
mortgaged
homes
between
2008-2013.
The
lived
experience
of
this
process
will
also
be
highlighted,
based
on
interviews
with
over
30
mortgage
affected
people
and
participant
observation
at
anti-eviction
assemblies
in
the
Barcelona
metropolitan
area
since
October
2013.
This
way,
we
argue,
mortgaged
homeownership
became
central
in
enrolling
biological
life
into
the
process
of
rent
extraction,
in
two
distinct
ways.
First,
by
making
hundreds
of
thousands
of
livelihoods
mortgaged,
that
is,
directly
dependent
on
the
success
or
failure
of
capital
accumulation
strategies
rooted
in
the
built
environment.
Second,
by
producing
hundreds
of
thousands
of
indebted
subjects
who
have
to
be
embedded
continuously
in
the
production
process
in
order
to
meet
their
debt
obligations,
and
who
often
remain
indebted
even
after
they
are
evicted
from
the
home
they
used
to
own."
Christakis
Georgiou
What
is
to
be
done
about
the
EU?
Situating
the
debate
in
the
long-term
tendencies
behind
European
unification
"The
last
four
years
have
seen
the
morphing
of
the
economic
crisis
unleashed
in
2007/8
into
a
sovereign
debt
crisis
that
initially
led
to
wild
speculation
about
the
collapse
of
the
eurozone
only
for
that
speculation
to
steadily
die
down
as
of
September
2012
and
the
ECB's
explicit
signalling
that
such
a
prospect
was
not
conceivable.
The
speculative
dimension
of
the
eurozone
crisis
is
now
over,
and
this
has
created
conditions
(collapsing
sovereign
bond
yield
spreads)
that
will
only
quicken
the
pace
at
which
the
real
eurozone
crisis
ie
the
competitiveness
split
between
creditor
and
debtor
member
states
will
be
fixed
by
the
European
bourgeoisie(s).
The
eurozone
crisis
has
spawned
a
corresponding
political
crisis
which
has
two
dimensions.
One
has
been
the
pitting
of
creditor
member
states
against
debtor
member
states.
Another
has
been
the
resurgence
of
euroscepticism
a
phenomenon
that
ebbs
and
flows
with
the
economic
fortunes
of
European
capitalism.
The
radical
Left
has
not
watched
these
developments
from
the
sidelines.
A
debate
has
emerged
about
the
Left's
attitude
towards
the
euro
and
the
European
Union
more
broadly.
Different
currents
have
developed
diverging,
if
not
outright
conflicting,
attitudes.
Some
argue
the
Left
has
to
campaign
for
more
fiscal
federalism
so
that
transfers
can
be
organised
from
creditor
to
debtor
states
(either
through
official
debt
restructuring
or
a
eurozone
budget)
while
others
argue
for
withdrawal
from
the
eurozone
and
even
the
EU
and
a
strategy
of
national
economic
development
in
the
member
states
in
which
the
radical
Left
can
take
power.
The
problem
with
these
debates
is
the
general
voluntarism
in
which
arguments
are
pitched.
This
is
also
reflected
in
the
fact
that
many
on
the
Left
followed
the
speculators
in
2010/12
in
expecting
a
eurozone
implosion.
What
I
want
to
do
in
this
contribution
is
situate
the
question
of
European
unification
in
a
longterm
perspective.
I
start
by
telling
the
story
of
how
the
problem
of
continental
unification
emerged
in
the
late
nineteenth
century
and
then
gave
rise
to
a
long
European
civil
war
in
the
first
half
of
the
twentieth
century.
I
then
present
the
position
adopted
by
the
Communist
International
in
1923
with
regards
to
the
issue
as
well
as
Trotsky's
rationale
for
it.
The
third
part
of
the
contribution
deals
with
the
unification
from
above
solution
that
was
provided
to
the
problem
in
the
early
fifties
by
the
French
and
German
bourgeoisies
and
sketches
how
that
process
has
unfolded
over
the
past
sixty
or
so
years.
I
conclude
with
a
few
considerations
on
what
this
entails
for
the
Left's
attitude
towards
the
EU
as
well
as
the
prospects
of
the
process
of
unification
from
above
in
the
coming
decade
or
so."
Roja
Ghahari
"Women
under
the
This
paper
will
examine
the
role
that
the
Iranian
welfare
system
(Islamic
charities
and
income
redistribution
policies)
has
played
in
the
making
and
maintenance
of
the
Islamic
Republic
of
Iran.
Specifically,
the
impact
of
the
Iranian
social
safety
net
in
promoting
gender
roles
will
be
assessed.
Challenging
the
views
of
the
Islamic
Republic
as
an
archaic
fundamentalist
regime
or
an
anti
imperialist
state,
this
paper
will
draw
attention
to
how
neoliberal
strategies
have
manifested
themselves,
albeit
in
different
ways,
in
Iran
in
the
past
30
years.
Although
it
is
claimed
that
Iran
has
not
been
integrated
into
global
capitalism,
many
of
the
same
tendencies
observed
in
other
capitalist
countries-
privatization,
welfare
state
retrenchment,
and
other
general
features
of
neoliberal
capitalism
-have
materialized
in
Iran.
The
dual/parallel
welfare
system
of
corporatist
institutions
and
parastatal
organizations,
able
to
target
both
the
middle
class
and
the
poorer
population,
tries
to
alleviate
the
impacts
of
various
neo-liberal
policies.
The
closer
examination
of
the
welfare
system,
however,
will
demonstrate
its
gendered
character
and
the
specific
ways
that
it
reinforces
gender
hierarchies,
pacifies
dissent
and
maintains
the
regimes
ideological
hegemony."
Paraskevi
Gikopoulou
The
Greek
Communist
Struggle
and
its
Suppression:
Prelude
to
Greeces
Right-Wing
Politics,
1944-1946
This
paper
examines
the
conditions
under
which
the
left-wing
resistance
in
Greece
was
oppressed
and
suppressed
during
the
liberation
period
and
until
the
official
civil
war
begun
in
1946-1949.
I
seek
to
examine
via
archival
documents
and
historical
texts
the
relationship
between
the
armed
and
political
struggle
of
the
Communist
Party
of
Greece
(KKE),
and
how
this
struggle
was
negated
by
the
Allied
forces
and
the
Nazi
Collaborators
in
the
post-war
era.
This
exploration
enables
us
to
comprehend
clearly
the
mechanisms
under
which
a
young
European
country
of
the
time
such
as
Greece
entered
a
family
of
capitalist
and
liberal
values
at
the
expense
of
a
left-wing
popular
movement
that
was
gaining
massive
support.
A
dialogue
between
the
British
Foreign
policy,
Greek
bourgeois
politicians,
Greek
monarcho-
fascists
and
collaborators
will
be
discussed
so
as
to
see
how
right-wing
values
seized
power
by
force
after
the
war
was
over
so
as
to
keep
Greece
within
the
western
sphere
of
influence.
Michael
Goldfield
Coal
Miners
in
the
Vanguard
Large
numbers
of
studies
have
shown
that
coal
miners,
throughout
history,
around
the
world,
with
some
notable
exceptions,
have
been
among
the
most
militant,
solidaristic
workers.
In
addition,
when
organized
they
have
gravitated
towards
political
radicalism.
These
tendencies
also
existed
in
the
United
States
during
the
late
19th
and
early
20th
centuries,
and
were
especially
prevalent
during
the
1930s,
as
millions
of
industrial
workers
organized.
Coal
miners
during
this
period
engaged
in
dramatic
strikes,
inspired
other
workers,
and
came
to
their
aid
in
numerous
situations.
In
the
labor
upsurge
in
the
U.S.
during
this
period,
they
were
the
vanguard
sector
of
the
working
class.
Their
class
collaborationist
leadership,
however,
personified
by
miners
president
John
L.
Lewis,
partly
reflected
these
aspirations,
but
also,
not
only
savagely
repressed
democracy,
but
effectively
destroyed
more
radical
elements
in
the
union.
Jamie
Gough
The
crisis
in
Britain
since
2007:
why
has
the
resistance
so
far
been
weak,
and
the
possibilities
for
a
socialist
response
"This
paper
explores
the
evolution
of
the
crisis
in
Britain
since
2007.
My
analysis
sees
neoliberalism
as
a
logical
strategy
for
capital
to
raise
value
creations
and
profitability,
as
nevertheless
involving
severe
contradictions
for
capital,
and
as
consisting
of
class
struggle.
Neoliberalism
therefore
has
deep
logic
but
no
stable
forms.
British
governments
from
1990
to
2010
developed
a
neoliberalism
with
social-democratic
elements.
This
reflected
contradictions
for
capital
thrown
up
by
1980s
neoliberalism,
in
the
manifest
erosion
of
production
and
reproduction.
Social
democratic
elements
could
be
afforded
because
of
the
booms
of
the
mid-1990s
and
mid-2000s
sustained
by
credit
expansion.
But
the
latter
went
into
crisis
in
2007-8.
In
response,
British
capital
has
embarked
on
a
new
strategy
of
devalorisation
and
raising
the
rate
of
exploitation,
despite
knowing
the
problems
this
may
eventually
lead
to
in
productive
inefficiency
and
political
instability.
The
burden
of
the
crisis
has,
consequently,
fallen
entirely
on
the
working
class.
Why,
then,
has
resistance
since
2008
so
far
been
weak?
The
attacks
in
the
private
sector
have
been
met
with
almost
no
resistance
from
workers
and
trade
unions.
Resistance
to
the
cuts
in
the
public
sector
have
so
far
been
limited
to
some
trade
union
actions,
but
without
successes.
An
explanation
includes
the
social-cultural
changes
in
the
British
working
class
effected
by
neoliberalism
over
30
years.
But
it
also
involves
the
fetishistic
and
reifying
forms
of
this
particular
crisis:
the
origin
of
the
recession,
and
the
governments
excuse
for
public
spending
cuts,
in
a
financial
crisis.
Since
the
Labour
Party
accepts
these
fetishistic
forms,
it
is
incapable
of
opposing
austerity.
This
suggests
that
building
successful
resistance
to
austerity
needs
the
working
class
movement
to
address
head-on
the
value
forms
of
the
crisis.
This
can
be
done
through
transitional
demands
around
employment,
wages,
work
intensity,
public
services,
state
benefits,
taxation
of
capital
and
ecology."
Kevin
W.
Gray
The
Feminization
of
Labor
and
Capitalisms
Stability
In
my
paper,
I
use
the
so-called
feminization
of
labor
as
a
means
to
theorize
the
processes
which
stabilize
the
capitalist
system.
My
basic
thesis,
following
the
French
pragmatists,
is
that
new
forms
of
labor
are
explainable
by
capitalisms
response
to
emergent
lifeworld
protest
movement.
The
feminization
of
labor,
I
believe,
is
explainable,
at
least
in
part,
by
the
capitalist
systems
exploitation
of
the
artistic
critique
in
its
response
to
emergent
protest
movements
in
the
1960s.
While
it
is
true
that,
the
first
two
(major)
employment
agencies
were
founded
in
the
immediate
post-war
era:,
Kelly
Girl
Service
(1947)
and
Manpower,
Inc,
(1948)
to
market
their
jobs
to
women
(Hatton
2011:
7),
I
argue
that
the
widespread
feminization
of
labour
(at
least
with
respect
to
temp
work)
is
explainable
by
capitalisms
exploiting
values
from
the
lifeworld.
Following
Boltanski
and
others,
I
argue
that
the
phenomenon
which
legitimates
feminization
(and
precarization,
to
use
Standings
vocabulary)
is
capitalism
recourse
to
the
artistic
critique
of
capitalism,
which
responder
t
protests
by
allowing
for
new
freedoms,
new
family
arrangements,
etc.
inside
the
employment
relationship
(Boltanski
2002:
14).
Capitalisms
response
to
demands
for
autonomy
permitted
the
growth
of
so-called
network
firms,
the
decline
of
strict
hierarchy
(and
the
emergence
of
fuzzy
organizations),
increased
mobility
and
the
emergence
of
projects
which
gave
each
employee
the
possibility
to
develop
his
or
her
future
employability
(Chiapello
&
Fairclough
2002:
189).
However,
it
also
gave
companies
the
possibility
to
relegate
employees
(originally
women
but
increasingly
men)
to
contingent,
precarious
labour.
Phil
Griffiths
"The
nature-society
metabolic
rift
and
the
development
of
rational
agriculture
in
the
countries
of
the
capitalist
core
go
hand
in
hand
with
the
implementation
of
an
unequal
ecological
exchange,
which
Marx
already
described
regarding
guano
imports
from
Peru
during
the
1850s.
(Marx,
2009
;
Foster,
2000).
Countries
of
the
capitalist
core
claim
ownership
over
natural
spaces
(those
of
colonized
countries
or
under
imperial
domination)
as
well
as
embodied
labour
working-time
in
order
to
compensate
for
loss
in
soil
fertility.
Alf
Hornborg
describes
this
double
process
as
space-time
appropriation
(Hornborg,
2005).
For
Hornborg
-
as
well
as
a
number
of
other
authors
(Hornborg,
McNeill,
Martnez-Alier,
2007)-,
the
generalization
of
Marxs
unequal
ecological
exchange
hypothesis
in
enabled
by
references
to
the
dependency
theory
and
the
world-system
analysis
paradigm.
In
this
Guimaraes
Nunes
capitalists
to
stave
off
the
possibility
of
non-validation
simultaneously
secure
the
basis
for
value
to
exist
at
all.
In
a
climate
of
increasing
instability,
these
sectors
are
therefore
crucial
to
capitalisms
survival.
Peter
Hallward
Harriss-White
The
name
Anthropocene,
and
the
theories
of
human
history
it
implies,
equivocates
between
humanism
and
technological
determinism
(is
it
humans
who
have
produced
the
Anthropocene
or
the
machines
they
have
invented?).
It
also
potentially
implies
a
homogeneous,
internally
undifferentiated
protagonist
-
the
so-called
anthropos
thereby
masking
historical
class
antagonisms.
To
a
certain
extent,
the
Marxist
tradition
shares
some
of
the
difficulties
of
representation
found
in
the
discourse
on
the
Anthropocene:
the
more
a
Spinozist-cum-Deleuzian
Marxism
emphasises
the
mode
of
production
as
an
(immanent
and
non-human)
assemblage,
the
more
difficult
it
becomes
to
produce
diachronic
narratives
structured
around
contradictions
and
antagonisms;
on
the
other
hand,
the
more
one
narrates
human
history
in
terms
of
class
antagonism
(an
element
usually
missing
from
scientific
writings
on
the
Anthropocene)
the
more
one
reproduces
the
human-as-
protagonist
argument
(and
hence
residual
humanism)
of
the
anthropos.
This
paper
aims
to
explore
these
basic
problems
in
order
to
suggest
the
ways
in
which
our
representations
of
the
Anthropocene
will
directly
affect
our
political
practices
in
and
towards
it.
It
claims
that
the
abstractly
conceived
struggle
between
man
and
nature
cannot
be
overcome
until
class
antagonisms
internal
to
society
have
been
resolved.
Moreover,
because
of
the
early
Marxs
unique
conception
of
the
male-female
relation
as
the
purest
mediation
between
man
[Mensch]
and
(historicized)
nature,
it
argues
that
a
Marxist
politics
of
the
Anthropocene
indeed,
Marxist
politics
tout
court
must
have
feminism
at
its
heart.
The
Anthropos
should
be
understood,
not
as
a
fact,
but
as
a
regulative
idea
whose
realization
would
require
universal
emancipation.
Eva
Hartmann
"Critical
scholars
of
European
Studies
point
out
that
the
EU
is
ordo-liberal
rather
than
neo-
liberal
in
its
orientation.
Along
the
lines
of
a
Gramscian
account
of
the
ideational
dimension
of
power
we
can
consider
ordo-liberal
principles
as
being
at
the
heart
of
the
emerging
European
ethico-political
project
aiming
to
establish
a
new
hegemony.
However,
the
critical
accounts
of
ordo-liberalism
have
provided
little
insights
so
far
into
changes
of
the
social
formation
induced
by
European
competition
and
underpinning
the
new
hegemony.
This
paper
intends
to
overcome
this
shortcoming.
It
interrelates
economic
sociology
and
state
theory
with
a
view
to
deepening
our
understanding
of
the
capital's
capacity
to
survive.
The
first
part
the
paper
will
further
refine
this
line
of
reasoning
by
drawing
on
insights
provided
by
the
sociology
of
professions
and
develops
the
notion
of
competitive
solidarity.
This
field
of
study
connects
professions
to
broad
sociological
issues
such
as:
occupational
closure,
social
stratification,
state
formation
and
the
development
of
a
capitalist
economic
order.
Against
this
theoretical
backdrop,
the
paper
examines,
on
more
empirical
grounds,
the
EU
efforts
to
bring
professional
services
within
the
ambit
of
the
Community
rules
on
competition
and
the
implication
this
has
for
existing
mediating
mechanisms
and
social
bonds
organised
through
the
professions."
Stephen
Hastings-King
This
paper
argues
that
approaches
drawn
from
Socialisme
ou
Barbarie
can
serve
as
templates
for
ways
to
make
the
socio-cognitive
paralysis
of
the
dominant
neo-liberal
imaginary
and
patterns
of
resistance
to
it
available
for
a
project
of
autonomy.
The
paper
emphasizes
the
sociological
orientation
of
the
groups
work,
which
enabled
adaptation
of
radical
politics
to
the
changing
geographies
and
organization
of
capitalism
of
the
1950s
and
early
60s.
SB
focused
on
the
close
analysis
of
relations
of
production
to
isolate
informal
patterns
of
assimilation
and
resistance
to
Fordist
production
design
and
technological
organization.
Their
later
notion
of
total
social
crisis
leaned
on
the
earlier,
granular
analyses
of
worker
experience
along
with
a
model
drawn
from
the
Hungarian
Revolution
to
orient
exploration
of
newer
forms
of
social
contestation.
Since
1967,
the
gradual
collapse
of
the
Marxist
Imaginary
has
pulled
down
an
entire
language
in
terms
of
which
collective
desires
for
emancipation
might
have
been
articulated.
This
situation
is
what
separates
us
from
SB.
We
face
starting
over.
Much
recent
activity
ignores
work
and
related
modes
of
experience.
In
so
doing,
opposition
to
the
dominant
capitalist
imaginary
deprives
itself
of
a
necessary
descriptive
base
and
undermines
new
theoretical
approaches.
Michael
Haynes
"This
paper
argues
that
as
mass
higher
education
has
developed
so
the
form
of
the
university
has
changed.
In
recent
decades
in
societies
like
the
UK
this
change
as
led
to
universities
coming
to
have
an
increasingly
crimogenic
form.
Universities
are
expected
to
operate
and
set
goals
for
themselves
that
appear
to
be
of
the
most
worthy
and
ethical
kind
but
their
day
to
day
practices
mean
that
they
must
and
do
routinely
violate
these.
Moreover
a
case
can
be
made
that
these
violations
are
as
sustained
and
egregious
as
many
of
the
activities
that
other
businesses
are
condemned
for
doing.
Staffs
live
out
these
contradictions
on
a
daily
basis
and
are
expected
to
be
complicit
in
them
even
though
they
know
that
if
exposed
the
institution
is
more
likely
to
condemn
and
dismiss
them
than
address
the
underlying
pressures
that
they
are
responding
to.
Resisting
this
requires
a
reinvigoration
of
critical
thinking
and
more
vigorous
workplace
resistance
that
overcomes
the
sectionalism
that
characterises
the
higher
education
workforce.
It
also
requires
stronger
links
externally
and
a
more
engaged
role
of
academics
as
critical
public
intellectuals.
We
briefly
sketch
how
the
role
of
the
university
has
developed
with
pressures
to
commodify
and
marketise
the
university
creating
a
form
of
academic
capitalism.
We
then
looks
at
some
of
the
illicit
activities
involved
in
the
recruitment,
teaching
and
assessment
of
students;
research
practices;
and
the
running
of
the
institutions
themselves.
The
final
part
rehearses
some
of
the
arguments
about
engagement
and
the
ways
in
which
the
space
for
critical
discussion
and
activism
might
be
defended
and
opened
up."
James
Heartfield
The
Manchester
Workers,
the
US
Civil
War,
and
the
founding
of
the
IWMA
"Ed
Hooson
and
John
Edwards
launched
the
Union
Emancipation
Society
in
Manchester
in
1862,
building
solidarity
with
the
Union
and
Lincoln
in
the
American
Civil
War.
Their
campaign
across
the
mill
towns
of
Lancashire
helped
stop
Lords
Russell
and
Palmerston
from
joining
the
war
on
the
side
of
the
Confederacy.
Karl
Marx
joined
their
campaign,
organising
meetings
in
London,
with
the
men
who
would
go
on
to
found
the
International
Working
Men's
Association.
Drawing
on
the
material
researched
for
the
pamphlet
British
Workers
and
the
US
Civil
War,
this
introduction
will
show
how
international
solidarity
helped
to
re-launch
the
workers
movement
in
Britain,
and
influence
it
in
the
world."
Paul
Heideman
&
Jonah
Birch
Henning
phenomena
'fit'
the
old
concept,
and
why
it
makes
sense
to
do
connect
new
phenomena
with
new
concepts
at
all.
Lars
Henriksson
"The
divide
between
unions
defending
jobs
and
individuals
and
organizations
questioning
the
environmental
impact
of
various
industries
and
products
is
old.
The
current
dual
crisis
of
economy
and
climate
is
simultaneously
sharpening
this
tension
and
calling
for
a
solution
as
it
becomes
obvious
that
environmental
issues,
far
from
being
luxury
problems,
are
fundamental
to
our
survival.
This
is
specially
evident
in
the
auto
industry.
Road
transports
are
responsible
for
a
big
and
growing
share
of
the
green
house
gas
emissions
and
all
measures
to
reduce
these
emissions
have
been
outweighed
by
the
ever
increasing
road
traffic.
Continued
mass
auto
transit
is
not
a
sustainable
system,
not
the
one
that
exists
today
and
even
less
so
if
the
car
density
of
the
industrialized
countries
would
be
globalized.
The
credit
crunch
of
2008
triggered
a
crisis
of
overproduction
that
had
been
endemic
in
the
auto
industry
for
a
long
time.
Worldwide,
unions'
response
was
support
totheir
corporations,
ranging
from
demands
for
state
subsidies
to
contractual
concessions.
Ever
since
then
I've
been
arguing
that
in
stead
of
giving
in
to
the
false
choice
between
creative
destruction
and
subsidized
mass
auto
transit,
unions
could
and
should
adopt
and
organize
around
demands
for
a
conversion
of
the
auto
industrial
complex.
The
auto
industry
is
a
flexible
and
versatile
machinery
for
mass
production
of
just
about
any
high
quality
industrial
goods.
A
nationalized
industry
could
create
safe
jobs
and
supply
society
with
the
goods
needed
to
replace
the
present
fossil
dependence.
Merely
good
arguments
will
not
be
sufficient.
Industry's
main
interest
in
a
capitalist
society
is
expansion
and
pursuit
for
profit.
The
powers
that
be
will
defend
status
quo,
however
asocial
or
destructive.
Reason
has
to
be
armed
with
social
muscles.
The
labor
movement,
and
specially
unions
in
sectors
where
production
is
intrinsically
unsustainable,
have
a
possibility
of
becoming
an
important
part
of
this
necessary
social
force
in
that
they
have
a
direct
material
interest
in
a
transformation,
both
to
save
jobs
and
the
planet.
Unions
constitute
in
themselves
a
strong
social
force
and
they
can
become
the
hub
of
a
broad
movement
involving
popular
forces
from
the
whole
of
the
society.
The
employees
also
have
a
first
hand
knowledge
that
is
essential
in
a
conversion.
In
questioning
the
direction
of
the
production
we
also
have
an
opportunity
to
question
and
transform
our
jobs
that
have
been
deskilled
and
deprived
of
content
for
so
long."
Anna Hermanson
Contesting
violent
representations
in
the
petrostate:
patriarchy,
colonialism,
and
big
oil
advertising
in
Alberta
Extraction
and
processing
of
the
tar
sands
in
northern
Alberta
constitute
one
of
the
largest
energy
projects
in
the
world
today.
The
related
environmental,
social,
and
climatic
violence
is
immense
and
impossible
to
fully
represent.
In
this
paper
I
will
show
that
existing
structures
of
power,
such
as
capitalism,
colonialism,
and
patriarchy,
work
to
construct
alternative
representations
of
industrial
projects
in
the
Albertan
petrostate.
I
will
use
an
advertisement
for
an
Edmonton
radio
station
that
violently
objectifies
a
womans
body
to
iterate
its
support
for
big
oil
as
a
starting
point
for
examining
the
history
of
gendered
violence
against
Indigenous
women
in
Canada
and
a
broader
relationship
between
patriarchy
and
extraction.
Then,
I
will
examine
the
government
of
Alberta
and
big
oils
use
of
Indigenous
bodies
in
tar
sands
advocacy
campaigns
and
posit
these
representations
as
tools
of
contemporary
capitalism
and
colonialism.
In
my
discussion,
after
illustrating
the
connections
between
patriarchy,
colonialism
and
environmental
violence,
I
will
propose
intersectional
and
anti-colonial
contestations
of
existing
representations
that
do
violence
as
integral
to
resistance.
Andy
Higginbottom
The
multinational
corporation
-
concentration,
fiction
or
rent?
Capitalism
survives
as
globalised
imperialism,
a
world
dominated
by
multinational
corporations
whose
pre-eminence
signifies
important
changes
in
the
capitalist
mode
of
production.
How
then
does
historical
geographical
materialism
approach
the
theorisation
of
multinational
corporate
capital?
This
paper
develops
three
strands.
Firstly,
standard
Marxist
explanations
highlight
the
concentration
and
centralisation
of
capital,
processes
located
in
Marxs
exposition
of
the
general
law
of
accumulation.
What
if
the
general
law
is
itself
modified
by
imperialism
as
monopoly
capitalism,
how
does
monopoly
correspond
with
the
concentration
and
centralisation
of
capital?
Secondly
the
analysis
revisits
Hilferdings
Finance
Capital
and
the
specific
focus
on
fictitious
capital
and
corporation
organisation:
promoters
profit,
credit
and
the
double
movement
of
capital.
Thirdly,
in
asking
what
are
super-profits
in
relation
to
Marxs
categories,
we
come
to
the
theory
of
imperialist
rent
and
its
application
to
forms
of
multinational
capital.
These
concepts
are
applied
to
a
concrete
study
of
the
City
of
Londons
role
as
a
centre
of
financing
of
global
mining
capital,
conceived
as
predatory
production.
The
paper
ends
with
observations
on
the
political
implications
of
the
analysis.
Rocio
Hiraldo
Orwell's Windows
When
the
liberal
humanist
Milan
Kundera
attacked
George
Orwells
1984
(1949)
as
an
example
of
political
thought
disguised
as
a
novel
he
did
so
on
the
grounds
that
there
are
no
windows
in
the
book.
Strictly
speaking,
this
is
incorrect.
The
word
appears
precisely
thirty-three
times
in
1984
a
point
which
one
hopes
was
not
lost
on
Georgiy
Daneliya,
the
director
of
the
1965
Soviet
comedy
Thirty-Three.
Orwells
windows,
far
more
than
the
ubiquitous
tele-screens,
refract
an
apprehension
about
transparency
whose
lineage
encompasses,
inter
alia,
Veras
dream
of
a
crystal
palace
in
Nikolai
Chernyshevskys
What
is
to
be
Done
(1863),
Ivan
Karamazovs
legend
of
the
Grand
Inquisitor
in
Fyodor
Dostoevskys
philosophical
novel
The
Brothers
Karamazov
(1880),
the
glass-world
of
Yevgeny
Zamyatins
We
(1924),
Walter
Benjamins
fascination
with
the
glass
constructions
of
nineteenth-
century
Parisian
arcades
and
Ernst
Blochs
ruminations
on
the
Bauhaus.
Circa
2014,
liberal
humanist
mobilisations
of
dystopian
writing
as
a
distorted
reflection
of
an
imputed
left
totalitarianism
require
some
revision
particularly
as
the
fantasy
of
total
transparency
can
now
be
seen
to
have
set
in
place
the
technological
architecture
of
a
twenty-first
century
totalitarianism.
What
then,
if
anything,
do
Orwells
windows
have
to
tell
us
about
the
NSA?
Alistair
Holmes
prejudice
into
the
modern
racism
of
science,
Social
Darwinism
and
Eugenics.
By
looking
at
the
experience
of
Black,
Irish
and
Jewish
people
living
in
and
visiting
Britain
I
examine
the
twisting
evolution
of
racism
and
the
construction
of
whiteness.
Above
all,
this
reveals
a
complex
relationship
between
class
and
race,
with
racist
tropes
often
originating
in
perceptions
about
social
class,
and
a
lack
of
clear
distinctions
between
ethnicity,
biology
and
civilisation
resulting
in
anything
but
the
established
black
and
white
definition
of
racism
we
are
familiar
with
today.
I
also
look
at
how
discourses
formed
in
the
colonial
context
came
to
inform
analyses
of
class
division
at
home,
and
how
anti-colonial
resistance
impacted
on
the
development
of
ideas
in
the
metropole.
Political
changes
within
Britain
posited
the
need
for
an
inclusive
nationalism
as
an
antidote
to
the
dangers
of
socialism.
At
the
same
time,
growing
concerns
about
the
degeneration
and
decline
of
the
'residuum'
undermined
the
liberal
ideas
of
progress
and
civilisation
underpinning
British
imperial
identity.
The
central
thrust
of
my
argument
is
that
far
from
being
defined
purely
in
distinction
to
a
colonial,
non-white
other,
the
various
strands
of
racist
ideology
prevalent
in
turn-of-the-
century
Britain
evolved
as
much
out
of
schisms
within
British
society
than
without.
Most
importantly,
these
developments
were
borne
of
the
historically
contingent
needs
of
British
capitalism
rather
than
a
trans-historical
division
between
East
and
West
embedded
in
Western
thought.
In
turn,
the
nature
of
this
racism
crystallised
through
the
experience
of
political
change
and
resistance
at
home
and
abroad,
and
the
project
of
constructing
a
unifying
British
nationalism
in
the
context
of
a
global
Empire."
Pertti
Honkanen
value,
are,
in
my
opinion,
questionable.
So
is
also
the
corollary,
that
the
total
labour
time
of
society
cannot
be
understood
as
some
homogenous
entity.
If
the
abstract
labour
time
cannot
be
measured
or,
more
generally,
if
it
is
not
a
definite
quantity,
the
quantitative
relations
between
prices
and
values
cannot
be
analysed
on
theoretical
level.
All
discussions
about
the
so-called
transformation
problem
become
obsolete.
It
is
also
difficult
to
make
conclusions
about
the
dynamics
of
capitalism,
if
(abstract)
labour
time
is
a
variable,
which
cannot
be
measured
or
defined.
Even
in
the
elementary
concept
of
productivity
of
labour
the
quantitative
definition
of
labour
time
is
essential.
It
seems
to
me
that
in
the
critique
of
the
traditional
Marxism
sometimes
the
child
is
thrown
away
with
the
washing
water.
The
confusion
of
empirical
measurement
of
labour
time
and
theoretical
understanding
value
relations
is,
may
be,
one
reason
of
this
phenomenon.
These
questions
bring
us
back
to
the
discussions
of
the
role
of
quantitative
and
qualitative
analysis
and
the
role
of
mathematics
in
the
work
of
Marxist
critique
of
political
economy
and
also
to
the
discussions
about
the
status
of
labour
theory
of
value
in
Marxist
theory."
Peter
Hudis
Abolishing
the
present
state
of
things:
reconstructing
Marxs
critique
of
politics
and
the
state
A
range
of
social
critics
has
pointed
to
the
hollowing
out
of
previously
entrenched
representative
political
institutions
and
the
growth
of
popular
anti-politics
sentiment
during
the
late
neoliberal
era
in
Western
democracies.
Antonio
Gramscis
prediction
of
a
crisis
of
authority
where
social
classes
become
detached
from
their
traditional
parties
seems
to
Ilkowski
"New
Warsaw
Pact",
beggar
imperialism
and
power
politics
in
Central
and
Eastern
Europ
The
recent
events
in
Ukraine
have
shown
that
imperialism
is
still
an
important
issue
in
the
area
of
former
Eastern
Bloc.
It
is
important
to
see
it
as
a
newest
expression
of
the
tendencies
visible
in
the
last
25
years:
in
particular
NATO
enlargement
and
existence
of
"New
Warsaw
Pact"
countries
very
much
loyal
to
USA,
and
on
the
other
hand
attempts
to
rebuild
its
power
position
by
Russia.
But
countires
within
the
former
Eastern
Bloc
are
not
only
pawns
in
great
powers
games.
One
can
also
see
the
phemomenon
of
"beggar
imperialism"
-
ambitious
and
independent
in
its
aims
but
at
the
same
time
dependent
of
external
help
to
achieve
them.
In
addition,
economic
and
social
crisis
after
2008,
with
it
uneven
impact
in
the
area,
is
an
important
framework
of
recent
geopolitical
competition
between
bigger
and
smaller
actors
in
the
Eastern
Europe.
Orazio
Irrera
regulating
the
scientific
forest
management
in
sub-Himalayan
India,
and
the
resistance
of
native
people
threatened
by
this
management.
This
long
period
of
struggle
concluded
with
the
1931
Forest
Panchayat
Rules
that
sanctioned
the
emergence
of
rural
communities
as
environmental
subjectivities
able
both
to
provide
some
forms
of
self-government
in
ecological
management
and
to
struggle
against
market-oriented
policies.
Robert
Jackson
"The
presentation
examines
the
structural
functions
of
the
military-industrial
complex,
and
the
bases
of
its
power.
I
demonstrate
its
continued
relevance
for
the
global
economic
and
geopolitical
positioning
of
the
British
ruling
class,
its
capitalist
and
state
elites.
The
UK
military-industrial
complex
has
a
uniquely
important
place
among
the
mechanisms
and
apparatuses
of
class
power
due
to
its
designated
purpose
of
protecting
the
existing
system
of
domestic
and
global
class
relations,
and
of
increasing
British
economic
and
geopolitical
leverage
on
the
global
level.
British
militarism
is
a
multi-faceted
form
of
intervention
in
the
processes
of
international
(political
and
economic)
competition,
and
it
supports
the
entire
architecture
of
global
capitalism,
including
the
international
rule-making
and
agenda-setting
institutions.
The
long-term
Anglo-American
political
and
military
alliance
in
particular
is
a
highly
ambitious
and
expansionistic
form
of
global
power
projection
and
systemic
organisation.
The
presentation
shall
also
elaborate
the
main
features
of
this
system
of
militarised
state
capitalism,
which
is
founded
on
the
increasing
privatisation
and
oligarchisation
of
the
politics
and
of
the
state,
the
institutional
capture
of
the
state
and
the
wider
public
sphere
by
oligopolistic
private
interests.
Militarised
state
capitalism
is
based
on
the
neo-colonial
extraction
of
global
resources
and
the
redistribution
of
wealth
from
the
British
taxpayers
to
private
military
companies,
a
privileged
oligopolistic
fraction
of
the
capitalist
class.
I
shall
demonstrate
that
militarism
functions
as
a
method
of
subordinating
the
state
in
accordance
with
oligopolistic
and
monopolistic
private
corporate
interests.
Additionally,
the
presentation
will
show
that
the
military-industrial
complex
helps
to
ensure
the
domestic
and
international
political
security
and
reliability
required
to
secure
the
investment
of
wealthy
Oriental
despots
and
other
segments
of
the
Middle
Eastern
and
global
capitalist
elite,
on
whose
support
the
continued
dominance
of
the
City
of
London,
of
other
powerful
British
industries,
and
of
the
UK
offshore
system
partly
depend.
I
shall
also
discuss
the
integration
of
the
energy
and
financial
industries
within
the
military-industrial
complex,
as
well
as
the
role
of
the
military-industrial
complex
in
the
integration
of
the
ruling
class
(through
shared
socialisation,
lobbying
and
the
contribution
of
the
military-industrial
complex
to
political
campaigning,
cronyism,
the
revolving
door
between
senior
military
and
corporate
positions
and
political
office,
financialisation,
interlocking
directorships,
etc.).
In
conclusion,
I
shall
indicate
how
the
military-industrial
complex
and
the
security
state
contribute
to
an
increasingly
totalitarian
concentration
of
social,
economic
and
political
power.
(In
the
discussion
afterwards
I
might
also
have
time
to
properly
discuss
the
issue
of
military
""Keynesianism"".
This
research
is
based
on
my
PhD
thesis
on
class
power
in
Britain
at
the
University
of
Cambridge,
which
is
a
couple
of
weeks
away
from
completion.
I
gave
a
two
hour
guest
lecture
on
the
British
military-industrial
complex
at
Cambridge,
and
an
article
on
the
topic
has
been
accepted
for
publication
by
Cuadernos
de
Marte,
a
South
American
journal
specialising
in
the
sociology
of
war.)"
Muhammad
Ali
Jan
Class,
State
and
the
'making'
of
Indigeneous
capital
in
a
global
milieu:
a
case
study
of
the
Pakistani
Punjab
Perhaps
nowhere
in
the
historical
materialist
tradition
has
the
tension
between
theory
and
history
been
greater
than
in
the
analysis
of
Imperialism
and
the
global
political
economy.
As
the
most
abstract
yet
necessary
concept,
the
global
or
the
world
has
been
the
source
of
endless
debate
within
Marxism
-
from
Lenins
analysis
of
inter-imperialist
rivalry,
to
dependency
and
'world-systems'
theories
to
present
day
debates
over
the
transnational
capitalist
class.
Among
these,
no
framework
has
invited
greater
enthusiasm
or
criticism
than
the
world-systems
approach;
scholars
have
chided
world-systems
theorists
for
their
functionalist
and
deterministic
view
of
exploitation
while
the
latter
have
accused
their
critics
of
glossing
over
a
highly
unequal
international
order
and
its
effects
on
the
nature
and
pattern
of
capitalist
development
in
the
periphery.
This
paper
argues
that
while
many
of
the
debates
among
both
defenders
and
detractors
of
world-systems
and
dependency
approaches
brought
about
considerable
advances
in
our
understanding
of
capitalist
accumulation
on
a
world-scale,
3
fundamental
elements
are
essential
if
we
are
to
grasp
unequal
development
more
fully;
firstly,
unlike
dependency
theory
and
world-systems,
it
is
not
the
nation
but
the
international
social
relation
between
national
capitals
of
different
strengths
in
the
framework
of
what
Marx
called
the
competition
of
capitals
which
should
be
the
focus
of
attention;
second,
in
order
to
avoid
purely
economistic
understandings
of
class
formation
and
capital
accumulation
the
role
of
the
state
must
be
central
to
the
analysis.
Finally,
it
must
be
recognized
that
this
relationship
of
hierarchy
is
historically
constituted
so
that
a
long
term
perspective
on
the
'making'
and
development
of
national
capitalist
classes
is
crucial
for
an
understanding
of
both
the
continuities
and
discontinuities
in
its
relationship
both
to
international
capital
and
domestic
working
classes.
Drawing
on
South
Asian
economic
history
and
with
a
particular
focus
on
Pakistani
Punjab,
this
paper
then
demonstrates
how
the
historical
interplay
between
British
and
indigenous
capital
as
well
as
the
colonial
state,
was
crucial
in
the
making
of
an
indigenous
capitalist
class,
drawn
from
landed,
mercantile
and
bureaucratic
groups,
that
came
to
rely
not
on
technological
improvement,
but
cheapening
of
labour-power
as
its
differencia
specifica
and
whose
patterns
of
investment
were
crucial
in
determining
the
nature
of
accumulation
and
its
outcomes
for
the
exploitation
and
welfare
of
labour.
If
the
survival
of
capitalism
is
to
be
fully
understood
then
one
needs
to
analyze
this
making
of
state
and
capital
as
an
interplay
with
the
global
so
that
not
only
the
strengths
of
capital
are
revealed,
but
its
vulnerabilities
exposed
so
that
radical
praxis
can
transform
it.
Heesang
Jeon
Knowledge
and
the
contradiction
between
the
forces
of
production
and
the
relations
of
production
in
capitalism
Commodities
have
the
dual
characteristic,
being
both
value
and
use-value,
and
so
does
knowledge:
knowledge
specifies
what
to
produce,
i.e.
use-value,
and
how
to
produce
(production
technologies);
at
the
same
time,
it
determines
the
complexity
and
productivity
of
commodity-producing
labour,
that
is,
the
value
productivity
of
commodity-producing
labour,
see
Jeon
(2011)
*.
Deriving
from
the
abstract
and
fundamental
opposition
between
value
and
use-value,
the
dual
characteristics
of
knowledge
is
distinguished
from
other
forms
such
as
the
opposition
between
money
and
commodities
and
the
separation
of
purchase
and
sale.
These
developed
and
concrete
forms
are
the
abstract
(but
real)
basis
of
economic
crisis,
which
not
only
reveals
the
contradictory
and
unstable
nature
of
the
capitalist
mode
of
production,
but
also
enables
the
economy
to
recover
from
crises,
by
restoring
balance
between
sectors,
increasing
profit
rates
or
eradicating
overproduction
facilities.
By
contrast,
the
dual
characteristics
of
knowledge,
as
expressed
in
the
contradiction
between
the
forces
of
the
capitalist
production
and
its
relations
of
production,
points
to
the
eventual
demise
of
capitalism.
Value
production,
driving
incessant
accumulation
of
knowledge,
will
eventually
reach
the
point
where
production
stops
being
the
means
of
satisfying
human
needs
and
reproducing
the
society,
the
basis
of
value
production.
*
Heesang
Jeon
(2011),
The
Value
and
Price
of
Information
Commodities:
An
Assessment
of
the
South
Korean
Controversy,
in
Paul
Zarembka,
Radhika
Desai
(ed.)
Revitalizing
Marxist
Theory
for
Today's
Capitalism
(Research
in
Political
Economy,
Volume
27),
Emerald
Group
Publishing
Limited,
pp.191-222.
Cedric
Johnson
Between
Revolution
and
the
Racial
Ghetto:
Harold
Cruse
and
Harry
Haywood
Debate
Class
Struggle
and
the
Negro
Question,
1962-1968
This
paper
revisits
an
historic
exchange
between
two
black
ex-Communists,
Harold
Cruse
and
Harry
Haywood.
Their
debate
was
precipitated
by
Cruses
influential
1962
essay
for
Studies
on
the
Left,
Revolutionary
Nationalism
and
the
Afro-American,
which
declared
that
the
American
Negro
was
a
subject
of
domestic
colonialism.
Written
against
the
prevailing
liberal
integrationist
commitments
of
the
civil
rights
movement,
his
essay
called
for
black
economic
and
political
independence,
and
inspired
many
of
the
younger
activists
who
would
give
birth
to
the
black
power
movement.
In
a
series
of
essays
for
the
Bay
Area
black
radical
journal,
Soulbook,
Haywood
criticized
Cruses
mishandling
of
class
politics
among
blacks,
and
his
retreat
from
anti-capitalism.
Their
exchange
was
in
many
ways,
a
debate
with
the
wider
American
Left,
old
and
new,
during
an
historical
epoch
when
the
struggles
against
southern
Jim
Crow
segregation
gave
way
to
black
power
militancy
and
urban
revolt,
and
many
activists
proclaimed
that
the
black
vanguard
had
supplanted
the
mass
worker
as
the
leading
edge
of
left
revolutionary
politics
in
the
United
States
and
beyond.
This
forgotten
episode
is
important
on
its
own
terms,
for
what
it
says
about
the
character
and
limitations
of
left
political
thinking
during
the
sixties,
and
equally
for
understanding
commonsensical
notions
of
African
American
public
life
in
our
times
which
too
often
remain
rooted
in
the
vanished
sociological
context
and
political
realities
of
the
twentieth
century
racial
ghetto.
Jonny
Jones
Some
thoughts
on
'anti-politics'
in
austerity
Britain
The
Australian
Marxists
Elizabeth
Humphrys
and
Tad
Tietze
have
suggested
that
there
presently
exists
a
widespread
mood
of
anti-politics,
stemming
from
a
crisis
of
representation
that
leads
most
people
to
see
politics
as
completely
detached
from
their
lives.
Their
analysis
proceeds
from
an
interpretation
of
Marxs
critique
of
politics
and
the
state,
as
well
as
from
Gramscis
insights
into
the
processes
by
which
classes
and
class
fractions
become
detached
from
their
traditional
parties.
In
analyses
of
the
Australian
political
class,
and
in
Luke
Stobarts
work
on
the
15-M
movement
and
the
growth
of
Podemos
in
the
Spanish
state,
it
appears
that
this
rejection
of
the
political
mainstream
can
lead
to
disparate
outcomes
depending
on,
among
other
factors,
the
balance
of
class
forces
and
the
strategies
pursued
by
the
political
classes
and
the
left
to
relate
to
the
anti-politics
mood
and
the
movements
that
it
imbues.
In
this
paper,
I
hope
to
assess
the
applicability
of
Humphrys
and
Tietzes
broad
conception
of
anti-
politics
to
analysis
of
political
developments
in
Britain
since
the
2010
student
revolt,
such
as
the
anti-austerity
movement
and
the
recent
emergence
of
UKIP
as
an
electoral
force;
and
to
examine
its
implications
for
revolutionary
strategy
in
Britain.
Timothy
Joubert
Gendering
the
Social
Factory:
Marxism,
Social
Reproduction,
and
Women's
Oppression
"This
paper
examines
the
ability
of
Marxist
theory
to
comprehend
gender
oppression
and
trace
the
material
base(s)
of
womens
oppression.
A
critical
survey
of
relevant
literature
and
discussion
is
presented
in
the
two
main
topic
areas
of
reproductive
labour,
a
concept
some
Marxists
have
used
to
attempt
to
locate
the
basis
of
gender
oppression,
and
sexual
violence,
which
Marxists
have
often
been
hesitant
to
theorise
about.
In
particular,
this
paper
focuses
on
the
arguments
of
feminist-Marxists
in
the
Italian
Autonomist
tradition
to
interrogate
the
relationship
between
womens
particular
relation
to
capitalist
production
(exploitation
in
the
domestic
sphere)
and
their
ideological
and
material
subordination.
It
is
argued
that
the
gendered
organisation
of
social
reproduction
is
determinate
of
a
broader
social
labour
relation
between
women
and
men,
articulated
through
immaterial
affective
labours,
and
disciplined
by
sexual
violence.
Building
on
the
Autonomist
concept
of
the
social
factory,
these
relations
of
gender
form
a
fundamental
constituent
part
of
capitalist
class
relations
and
are
central
to
the
circuit
of
capitalist
accumulation,
an
understanding
that
Marxism
must
grasp
in
order
to
confront
womens
oppression.
Christoph
Jnke
Leo
Koflers
Marxism
and
the
New
Left
in
postwar
Germany:
Mentor
and
persona
non
grata
at
the
same
time
"Leo
Kofler
(1907-1995)
was
an
Austrian-German
social
philosopher
and
social
theorist
who
ranks
with
Ernst
Bloch,
the
Marburg
politicologist
Wolfgang
Abendroth
and
the
Frankfurt
school
theoretician
Adorno
among
the
few
well-known
Marxist
intellectuals
in
post-war
Germany.
However,
almost
nothing
of
his
work
was
ever
translated
into
English,
and
he
is
therefore
little
known
in
the
English-speaking
world.
More
than
that,
even
in
Germany
this
major
leftwing
thinker,
proponent
of
the
first
generation
of
a
German
New
Left
in
the
1950s
and
1960s,
is
virtually
absent
from
left
discourses.
In
trying
to
explain
the
deeper
causes
of
that
split,
Christoph
Jnke
explores
the
main
outlines
of
Koflers
distinctive
interpretation
of
Marxism,
which
connected
sociology
and
history
with
aesthetics
and
philosophical
anthropology.
On
this
background
he
portrays
him
and
his
theory
of
a
progressive
elite
as
an
original
and
fruitful
answer
to
the
structural
problems
not
only
of
the
German
left;
as
an
interesting
attempt
to
situate
the
struggles
of
the
60s
and
70s
in
the
historical
continuum
of
the
transition
from
classical
socialism
to
postmodernism;
and
as
an
early
attempt
to
clear
the
problems
of
the
contemporary
multitude.
Trish
Kahle
The
Graveyard
Shift:
Energy
Industry
Reorganization
and
Rank
and
File
Rebellion
in
the
United
Mine
Workers
of
America,
1963-1973
This
paper
examines
the
link
between
reorganization
of
American
energy
production
and
the
ability
of
workers
to
forge
political
spaces
to
challenge
capital
within
their
unions,
thus
illuminating
how
capitalism
survived
the
energy
and
political
crises
of
the
1970s.
Energy
production
in
the
United
States
underwent
a
striking
transformation
in
the
1960s
and
1970s
as
nuclear
power
expanded
rapidly.
The
struggle
over
what
fuelcoal
or
uraniumwould
power
the
United
States
placed
Appalachian
coal
miners
at
the
center
of
a
process
that
less
represented
a
struggle
between
fuels
as
it
did
a
process
of
capitalist
consolidation
and
industry
reorganization.
Within
a
decade,
energy
production
transformed
from
a
series
of
discrete
industries
rooted
in
a
single
source
fuel
to
a
smaller
number
of
energy
conglomerates
with
diverse
fuel
investments.
Contextualized
by
this
transformation,
the
union
democracy
movement
in
the
United
Mine
Workers
of
America
appears
not
only
as
an
internal
struggle
over
democratic
practices,
but
also
a
broad
political
struggle.
The
political
space
forged
in
the
UMWA
by
the
Miners
for
Democracy
was
able
to
entertain
radical
solutions
to
long-standing
problems
exacerbated
by
a
series
of
concurrent
crises:
mine
safety,
rank
and
file
power,
and
environmental
destruction.
Giorgos
Kalampokas
like
the
mode
of
production
and
value-
as
well
as
their
historicity.
In
this
context,
we
seek
the
possible
consequences
of
Marxs
view
of
primitive
accumulation
for
a
philosophical
and
theoretical
approach
of
history
and
politics.
Following
Louis
Althussers
trail,
our
thesis
resides
on
the
argument
that,
contrary
to
an
approach
of
history
as
a
predefined,
evolutionary,
in
the
final
analysis
smooth,
succession
of
modes
of
production
that
follows
the
growth
of
productive
forces
a
process
like
the
one
Marx
himself
presents
in
the
1859
Preface-,
in
his
study
of
primitive
accumulation
he
presents
the
emergence
of
the
capitalist
mode
of
production
as
a
long
process
of
social
transformation,
both
the
starting
point
and
the
progress
of
which
are
as
such
aleatory
and
subjected
only
to
class
struggle
and
its
new
emerging
forms.
In
our
view
Marx
sets
the
encounter
between
social
forms
that
have
historically
emerged
independently
from
one
another
right
at
the
center
of
his
analysis
of
the
emergence
of
the
capitalist
mode
of
production.
We
argue
that
this
specific
interaction
between
these
social
forms
is,
as
we
call
it,
an
overdetermined
encounter
which
historically
modulates
new
relations
of
production
and
a
new
mode
of
production.
For
Marx
violence
is
also
set
at
the
very
core
of
primitive
accumulation.
Contrary
to
the
common
Marxian
theorization
according
to
which
violence
holds
nothing
but
a
secondary
part
in
historical
progress
standing
only
as
the
needed
friction
of
social
phenomena
with
reality
-phenomena
that
as
such
are
determined
by
different
laws-,
we
argue
that
Marx
attributes
a
transformative
and
constitutive
character
to
violence.
In
this
framework,
Marx
also
highlights
the
crucial
part
of
the
state
in
the
emergence
of
capitalist
relations
thus
providing
a
new
perspective
to
the
relation
between
the
political
and
the
economical
element
during
the
emergence
of
capitalism,
as
opposed
to
another
common
Marxian
approach
that
would
consider
the
first
to
be
only
an
expression
of
the
latter
attributing
to
the
economic
element
an
absolute
casual
primacy.
We
argue
that
Marx,
on
the
contrary,
highlights
from
the
very
beginning
the
significance
of
state
intervention
and
of
the
political,
extra-economical
coercion
for
the
making
of
new
relations
of
social
production
and
their
reproduction.
Given
this
analysis,
in
our
final
remarks
we
will
try
to
put
forward
a
political
and
philosophical
practice
of
Marxs
theory
of
primitive
accumulation
appealing
to
the
contemporary
pursue
of
a
communist
revolutionary
strategy."
Onur
Kapdan
Irregular
Times:
Gezi
Uprising
in
Turkey
-
Radical
Subjectivity
vs.
The
States
Capitalism
"The
2013
Gezi
Park
protests
constituted
a
new
type
of
horizontal
social
struggle
that
went
beyond
earlier
Turkish
politics,
whether
leftist
or
nationalist.
This
movement,
which
organized
horizontally
and
involved
a
new
generation
of
youth
occupying
public
space
added
yet
another
node
to
the
global
upheavals
since
2011.
The
movement,
however,
complicates
the
discontent
with
capitalism
and
representative
democracy
shared
by
all
of
these
movements.
Turkey
has
been
one
of
the
emerging
economies
of
the
last
decade
under
the
rule
of
the
Justice
and
Development
Party
(AKP),
which
also
continues
to
draw
significant
support
from
the
population.
In
this
context,
the
anti-capitalism
in
the
youths
radical
subjectivity
is
often
concealed
by
their
immediate
anti-authoritarian
demands
against
Prime
Minister
Erdoan
and
the
AKP.
Consequently,
Gezi
appears
to
be
a
cultural
uprising
of
the
new
petty
bourgeoisie,
la
Poulantzas.
This
paper
argues
against
this
appearance
based
on
an
ongoing
dissertation
research
into
the
roots
of
Gezi
and
the
consequent
neighborhood
assemblies.
Doing
so,
it
assesses
the
validity
of
following
strict
capitalist
class
divisions
to
understand
the
Turkish
context,
and
contends
that
capitalism
in
Turkey
is
primarily
driven
by
the
states
chosen
capitalists,
as
the
recent
carnage
at
the
Soma
coalmine
has
further
revealed.
The
paper
asserts
that
the
States
capacity
to
choose
who
and
what
accumulates
capital,
and
Erdoans
attempt
to
build
an
ideological
hegemony,
shows
youths
radical
subjectivity
is
a
negation
of
capitalism,
whose
own
contradictions
are
also
preliminarily
analyzed
in
the
paper."
Elif
Financialisation
in
the
Middle
Income
Countries:
An
Analysis
of
the
Changing
Investment
and
Financing
Behaviours
of
Non-Financial
Corporations
in
Turkey
and
Brazil
The
last
few
decades
have
been
marked
by
the
broadening
and
deepening
role
of
finance,
which
is
often
discussed
with
reference
to
the
term
financialisation.
It
is
evident
that
much
has
been
written
on
the
subject
in
the
context
of
core
capitalist
countries.
This
paper
discusses
how
financialisation
might
fit
as
an
analytical
tool
for
exploring
changes
in
the
economies
of
middle
income
countries,
by
drawing
on
the
experiences
of
Brazil
and
Turkey.
In
adopting
the
financialisation
approach,
this
study
aims
to
go
beyond
the
dichotomous
understanding
of
finance
and
real
economy.
It
focuses
on
the
new
dynamics
in
both
realms
and
the
interconnections
between
the
two.
It
argues
that
one
of
the
crucial
points
to
consider
in
analysing
the
financialisation
in
middle
income
countries
is
to
understand
the
changes
in
the
mode
of
integration
of
those
countries
into
the
world
economy
and
accompanied
transformations
in
the
financial
and
non-financial
sectors
of
these
economies
vis--vis
their
internal
dynamics.
One
of
the
major
characteristics
of
middle
income
countries
over
the
last
decade
has
been
their
deepening
integration
into
the
world
economy
through
trade,
foreign
direct
investment
and
capital
flows,
a
process
which
has
been
supported
by
the
changes
in
their
monetary
policies.
Throughout
the
period,
there
have
been
important
changes
in
the
financing
and
investment
behaviour
of
non-financial
companies.
The
aim
of
this
study
is
to
discuss
these
changes
in
the
behaviour
of
NFCs
in
relation
to
an
array
of
transformations
that
those
economies
have
undergone
over
the
last
decade.
It
addresses
the
dearth
of
empirical
work
on
financialisation
of
NFCs
in
middle
income
countries
by
examining
the
changes
in
the
asset
and
liability
structures
of
the
major
NFCs
in
Turkey
and
Brazil.
Situated
in
a
broader
context,
this
analysis
sheds
lights
on
the
how
NFCs
have
been
integrated
into
production
chains
centred
in
advanced
economies
and
how
they
have
also
been
able
to
raise
funds
through
international
capital
markets.
Based
upon
its
analysis,
this
study
addresses
two
major
questions.
First,
it
explores
the
implications
of
the
changes
in
practices
and
behaviours
of
NFCs
for
the
capital
accumulation
processes
of
these
countries.
Second,
it
discusses
the
increased
exposure
of
NFCs
to
financial
risk
posed
by
volatile
exchange
rates
and
international
capital
flows
and
its
implications
for
those
economies.
smail
Karatepe
This
paper
looks
at
the
ways
Claudia
Jones
synthesised
her
experiences
as
a
black
Trinidadian
working
class
woman
to
move
beyond
the
Stalinist
orthodoxy
of
the
CPUSA
and
develop
a
proto-intersectional
analysis
of
the
oppression
of
black
women.
The
final
section
focuses
upon
Jones
work
organising
the
Caribbean
diaspora
in
London
through
the
anti-
racist,
anti-imperialist
paper
the
West
Indian
Gazette.
However,
Claudia
Jones
remained
a
Leninist
to
the
end
of
her
life,
and
whilst
the
axis
of
her
political
praxis
was
fighting
against
oppression,
this
paper
employs
a
Leninist
prism
to
understand
Jones
thought.
In
doing
so
Jones
can
be
seen
as
both
a
product
of
the
Harlem
Popular
Front
and
internal
debates
of
the
CPUSA,
but
also
an
original
and
imaginative
thinker
who
embodied
the
principle
that
Leninism
should
be
a
politics
for
the
oppressed.
Nektarios
Kastrinakis
The
stillbirth
of
Communist
Russia
The
collapse
of
the
Soviet
Union
is
today
one
of
the
main
reasons
why
the
left
has
difficulty
to
threaten
bourgeois
ideological
hegemony.
One
way
to
deal
with
this
problem
is
to
radically
dissociate
the
Soviet
Union
from
the
communist
program.
This
paper
sets
to
investigate
how
far
the
claim
that
Soviet
Union
was
a
communist
social
formation
is
justified.
We
examine
the
first
two
formative
decades
of
Soviet
Union
(1917-1938)
and
we
argue
that
the
revolution
was
already
going
amiss
from
its
outset
because
of
the
social
structure
of
Russia
and
the
absence
or
failure
of
the
revolutions
in
Europe.
On
the
political
level,
we
take
Marxs
analysis
of
the
Paris
Commune
in
his
The
Civil
War
in
France
as
his
opinion
about
the
form
of
the
dictatorship
of
the
proletariat
and
we
compare
it
with
the
reality
of
revolutionary
Russia.
We
argue
that
the
specific
social
structure
and
historical
conditions
of
the
revolution
in
Russia,
combined
with
Lenins
theory
about
the
organisation
and
nature
of
the
revolutionary
party,
lead
to
a
reduction
of
the
dictatorship
of
the
working
class
to
a
dictatorship
of
the
party
of
the
working
class
and
then
to
a
silencing
of
the
democracy
inside
the
party
which
had
a
debilitating
effect
on
the
course
of
the
revolution.
On
the
economic
level,
we
build
on
Paresh
Chattopadhyays
argument
that
capital
was
always
at
work
in
the
Soviet
Union
despite
claims
to
the
contrary
in
east
and
west
alike,
and
we
argue
that
transformation
of
the
social
relations
of
production
(workers
control
of
the
working
place
and
of
the
economy)
was
never
established.
Our
sources
are
the
works
of
the
classics
of
Marxism
(Marx,
Lenin,
Trotsky,
Luxemburg)
and
later
and
more
recent
authors
like
Charles
Bettelheim,
Robert
Vincent
Daniels,
Alec
Nove
and
Paresh
Chattopadhyay.
Paul
Kellogg
For
unity
against
war
and
capitalism
the
half-remembered
contribution
of
Leon
Trotsky,
1914-1917
"It
is
one
hundred
years
since
socialisms
greatest
crime.
August
4
1914,
the
parliamentary
caucus
of
the
worlds
then
largest
Marxist
organization
the
mass
Social
Democratic
Party
of
Germany
voted
to
support
financing
Germanys
war
effort.
Most
European
socialist
parties
followed
suit,
sending
their
members
into
the
horror
of
the
trenches
in
what
was
to
become
the
Great
War
of
1914-1918.
Prominent
among
the
small
minority
of
socialists
who
stood
firm
against
militarism,
were
two
Russians
Vladimir
Lenin
and
Leon
Trotsky.
Each
took
a
very
strong
anti-war
position,
but
did
so
in
quite
different
ways.
Lenins
positions
are
well-known
particularly
his
call
for
revolutionary
defeatism.
Trotskys
quite
distinct
positions
in
spite
of
his
role
as
main
author
of
the
pivotal
Zimmerwald
manifesto
have
largely
faded
from
memory.
This
paper
will
argue,
there
is
much
in
these
half-
forgotten
positions
that
are
relevant
to
socialist,
anti-war
activists
in
the
21st
century,
in
some
important
ways
more
relevant
than
the
positions
adopted
by
Lenin
and
the
Bolsheviks.
The
paper
will
survey
three
aspects
of
Trotskys
anti-war
work
in
this
period:
a)
the
positions
he
saw
as
central
to
the
movement,
in
particular
the
adoption
of
the
quite
simple
slogan
end
the
imperialist
war
and
the
promotion
of
the
call
for
the
formation
of
a
United
States
of
Europe;
b)
his
role
as
the
main
figure
in
a
daily
anti-war
newspaper,
Our
Word
(Nashe
Slovo);
and
c)
his
orientation
towards
a
group
of
internationalist,
anti-war
worker-militants
in
St.
Petersburg,
members
of
the
Inter-District
Committee
or
Mezhrayonka.
The
paper
will
then
conclude
with
some
reflections
on
why
Trotskys
distinct
positions
and
activity
have
been
only
half-remembered
in
the
decades
since.
This
paper
flows
from
research
being
prepared
for
an
edited
collection
reflecting
on
the
politics
and
practice
of
the
Mezhrayonka."
Sinead
Kennedy
Disciplining
the
Precarious
Body:
Biopolitical
regulation
in
an
era
of
chronic
crisis.
"Stream:
How
capitalism
survives?
A
Marxist-Feminist
perspective.
We
live
in
a
time
of
the
massification
of
insecurity
an
insecurity
that
is,
we
are
told,
the
necessary
condition
to
escape
from
crisis
and
secure
the
future
for
a
so-called
neoliberal
global
order.
Yet,
for
large
sections
of
the
population
this
temporality
of
crisis
has
been
replaced
with
a
crisis
of
ordinariness.
What
is
termed
crisis
is
now
a
defining
fact
of
life
as
peoples
lives
become
characterised
as
one
of
long-term
wearing
down
and
wearing
out
and
where
existence
is
increasing
precarious.
This
precaritisation
is
characterised
by
the
breaching
of
hygienic
borders
political
and
territorial
borders,
the
borders
between
the
global
north
and
south,
as
well
as
the
borders
of
race,
class
and
gender.
Every
aspect
of
social
relations
is
now
subjected
to
discipline
and
control
not
just
through
institutions
but
through
the
control
of
the
processes
of
life
itself.
This
paper
will
argue
that
repertoire
of
neoliberal
strategies
of
subjectivation
and
governance
are
particularly
explicit
in
the
treatment
and
representation
of
women
under
austerity.
It
will
focus
on
exploring
the
construction
of
a
neoliberal
logic
where
some
bodies
become
recognisable
subjects,
entitled
to
protection,
while
others
are
constructed
as
internal
enemies
and
rendered
disposable.
Sami
Khatib
Capital
is
a
purely
social
relation
that
valorizes
itself
while
temporalizing
its
own
historical
time.
The
value
of
a
commodity,
as
Marx
put
it,
is
defined
by
its
substance
which
is
itself
a
relation:
abstract
labor.
The
latter
is
produced
through
the
employment
of
living
labor.
Value,
however,
is
not
just
congealed
or
dead
labor,
but
most
of
all
undead
labor.
Within
the
spurious
infinity
of
the
ac-
and
decelerating
cycles
of
capital
accumulation,
dead
labor
is
valorized
and,
always
anew,
survives
its
own
death
as
undead
labor.
The
undeadness
of
value
as
capital
is
not
simply
speculative
or
supra-sensuous;
rather,
it
is
also
sensuous
and
violently
destructive.
What
Schumpeter
called
creative
destruction
is
not
only
an
immanent
necessity
within
the
process
of
capital
accumulation
but
also
the
eternal
recurrence
of
capitalisms
Urszene,
which
Marx
famously
coined
original
accumulation
(ursprngliche
Akkumulation).
If
capitalisms
modus
vivendi
is
actually
a
modus
moriendi,
capitalisms
eternal
resurrection
has
to
always
anew
destroy
earlier
stages
of
capitalism
and
non-capitalist
economies.
Against
this
spurious
infinity
of
creative
destruction,
Walter
Benjamin
proposed
a
different
form
of
destruction
a
certain
non-violent
or
even
messianic
destruction,
which
could
deposit
the
flawed
dialectics
of
capitalist
positions
and
negations.
However,
Benjamins
peculiar
constellation
of
messianic
nihilism
and
historical
materialism
cannot
be
mapped
from
the
perspective
of
the
self-valorizing
cycles
of
capitalist
accumulation.
Be
it
divine
violence,
the
modern
barbarian,
or
the
destructive
character,
his
theoretical
figures
of
de-figuration
propose
an
asymmetrical
negation
to
both
capitalist
creation
and
capitalist
destruction.
Benjamins
paradoxical
strategy
of
accelerationist
decelerationism
a
lightning-fast
pulling
of
the
emergency
break
of
the
racing
train
of
capitalist
modernity
alludes
to
a
new
way
of
conceiving
of
the
end
of
capitalism
to
a
communist
strategy
of
survival
which
exceeds
capitalisms
undeadness.
In
my
paper
I
will
discuss
Benjamins
messianic
nihilism
as
an
attempt
to
theorize
a
communist
cessation
of
capitalisms
modus
moriendi.
Seungman
Kim
2008
financial
crisis.
As
class
struggles
have
been
weakened
since
1997,
citizen
solidarity
replaced
class
hostilities,
and
many
liberals
who
were
disguised
as
lefties
have
been
trying
to
spread
a
discourse
of
the
universal
welfare
state
as
its
final
goal.
The
purpose
of
this
study
is
to
criticize
fundamental
premises
of
Korean
welfare
state
discourse.
Neoliberal
financialization
can
be
compatible
with
a
regime
of
universal
welfare,
which
may
establish
a
complementary
relationship
with
the
former
because
of
their
subordinated
status
of
East
Asian
countries
in
global
capital
market.
Among
others,
a
giant
public
pension
fund
emerged
as
one
of
the
most
important
financial
agencies
after
the
first
financial
crisis
and
formed
a
Korean
Capital
market
by
managing
the
huge
financial
assets.
A
discourse
on
the
universal
welfare
regime
in
South
Korea
should
be
analyzed
as
a
symptom
of
neoliberal
financialization,
not
as
its
'alternative'."
Jim
Kincaid
"Rightly,
the
rate
of
profit
continues
to
be
central
in
Marxist
work
on
the
world
economy.
But
in
much
current
research,
rate
of
profit
concepts
and
data
are
being
used
in
too
reductionist
and
mechanical
a
way.
We
cannot
now
make
the
assumption,
as
Marx
usually
did,
that
the
profit
rate
equals
the
amount
of
surplus-value
extracted
from
labour,
divided
by
capital
advanced.
Huge
quantities
of
surplus-value
are
drained
from
companies
in
the
form
of
payments
to
executives.
Even
for
declared
profits,
the
official
data
sources
on
which
Marxist
research
relies
are
failing
to
reflect
increasing
levels
of
corporate
tax
evasion,
made
easier
by
globalisation
and
the
ready
availability
of
tax
havens.
Also
missed
are
profits
made
invisible
because
disguised
as
exaggerated
estimates
for
tax-exempt
depreciation.
The
profitability
of
past
investment
is
only
one
influence
in
current
investment
decisions.
Corporate
cash
piles
have
been
building
up
on
a
gigantic
scale
because
the
rate
of
realised
profitability
is
in
fact
relatively
high.
It
is
the
level
of
investment
which
lags
and
this
is
of
course,
in
part,
because
future
profitability
is
expected
to
be
lower
or,
at
least,
more
uncertain.
But
cash
piles
are
also
accumulating
because
companies
want
a
large
war-chest
of
cash
reserves
to
raise
profits
by
playing
the
market
in
corporate
control
through
mergers
and
acquisitions
or
in
order
to
fight
off
unwelcome
raiders."
Stefan
Kipfer
&
Parastou
Saberi
have
spurred
debates
about
the
sources
of
right-wing
electoral
behaviour
among
both
white
and
non-white
fractions
of
the
working
class.
Informed
by
Antonio
Gramsci,
Henri
Lefebvre,
Frantz
Fanon,
Himani
Bannerji,
and
Gill
Hart,
our
approach
to
the
question
of
subaltern
support
for
authoritarian
politics
is
multifaceted.
We
emphasize
the
contingency
of
voting
choices
in
relationship
to
the
deeper
-
and
always
contradictory
-
terrains
of
everyday
life.
We
suggest
that
spatialized
public
discourses
(often
reified
by
means
of
electoral
maps)
force
us
to
deal
with
the
relationship
between
electoral
geographies,
racialized
socio-spatial
restructuring
and
territorialized
state
intervention
(notably
in
segregated
working-class
suburban
spaces).
We
conclude
that
the
contradictory
realities
of
working
class
support
for
hard
right
populism
have
major
implications
for
counter-colonial
left
political
strategies,
not
least
with
respect
to
the
national
question
in
its
various
thorny
forms.
Sebastian
Klauke
The
multiple
crises
of
economics,
democracy,
representation,
ecology
and
so
forth
are
not
over
or
solved,
capitalism
has
not
come
to
its
end.
Quite
the
reverse
can
be
observed:
capitalism
is
illustrating
once
again
its
flexibility
and
its
ability
to
survive.
What
state
theorist
Nicos
Poulantzas
back
in
the
1970ies
analyzed
as
Authoritarian
Statism
is
actually
having
its
breakthrough
by
now
in
Europe:
the
strengthening
of
the
executive
branches
of
politics
and
the
states
new
role
in
regulating
economic
processes
and
the
strategically
bypassing
of
rules
for
legal
and
constitutional
development
are
some
of
the
main
features
of
Authoritarian
Statism.
On
a
more
general
level
capitalism
is
experiencing
its
authoritarian
turn.
What
we
witness
are
two
kinds
of
realities
at
the
same
time:
while
there
are
on
average
no
serious
governmental
crises
throughout
Europe,
besides
at
least
a
crisis
of
hegemony
in
the
sense
of
Antonio
Gramsci
of
(pure)
neoliberal
thinking
and
political
acting,
the
European
societies
are
suffering
from
a
deep
multiple
crisis,
particularly
in
the
domain
of
social
reproduction
on
a
individual
as
well
on
social
level.
This
contribution
wants
to
examine
the
current
paths
of
the
crisis,
by
developing
an
own
notion
of
the
rising
Authoritarian
Statism.
Samuel
Teschke
forward
a
conception
of
social
relations
and
an
emphasis
the
centrality
of
power
and
class
struggle
for
our
account
of
history.
While
most
Marxists
see
themselves
as
heir
to
these
two
defining
features
of
Marx,
it
is
no
secret
that
it
has
often
been
difficult
to
properly
marry
them.
Political
Marxism
itself,
we
argue,
has
been
caught
within
this
contradictory
legacy.
As
a
result,
what
was
once
a
promising
historicist
alternative
became
mired
in
economistic
readings
of
capitalism
which
hinder
the
practice
of
historicisation
it
was
supposed
to
buttress.
This
article
seeks
to
make
good
on
the
initial
promise
of
Political
Marxist
by
radicalizing
the
agent-centered
and
historicist
legacy
of
Marx."
Samuel
Knafo
The
Imperialism
of
Financialisation:
Marxism
and
the
Uneven
History
of
Global
Finance
This
paper
analyses
the
Marxist
literature
on
financialisation
and
criticises
its
structuralist
bias
and
its
tendency
to
work
on
the
basis
of
aggregates
that
obfuscate
complex
and
diverse
social
relations.
As
I
argue,
this
lens
casts
financialisation
in
largely
asocial
and
de-
contextualised
ways
which
make
it
difficult
to
historicise
this
phenomenon
and
understand
the
power
relations
involved.
As
a
challenge,
this
paper
uses
a
Political
Marxist
framework
to
offer
an
alternative
account
based
on
agency.
In
particular,
I
ask,
why
has
financialisation
become
such
a
generalised
process?
This
very
fact
has
generally
been
taken
as
a
proof
in
itself
of
the
need
for
a
structural
approach.
For
this
seems
to
suggest
a
more
structural
driving
force
at
work.
To
counter
such
pervasive
narrative
about
financialisation,
this
paper
traces
the
uneven
development
of
financialisation
from
its
American
origins,
its
spread
through
Euromarkets
and
its
impact
on
financial
systems
in
Germany
and
Japan.
It
seeks
in
the
process
to
reframe
our
understanding
of
the
essential
features
of
financialisation
and
provide
the
foundations
for
a
'social
history'
of
its
evolution.
Ece
Kocabicak
the
initial
outcomes
of
my
data
analysis
with
regard
to
the
distinctive
features
of
capitalist
development
in
Turkey.
These
include
the
conditions
of
primitive
accumulation,
the
composition
of
capital
accumulation,
sectoral
distribution
of
free
wage-labour,
class
struggle
and
the
state.
In
doing
so,
I
expect
to
contribute
to
the
literature
by
demonstrating
the
mutually
shaping
relationship
between
patriarchy
and
capitalism."
ANGELOS
KONTOGIANNIS-MANDROS
Tales
of
Transformismo:
International
Human
Rights
Law
and
the
Onslaught
of
Neoliberal
Capitalism
Since
the
publication
of
Samuel
Moyns
2010
ground-breaking
study
on
the
contemporary
history
of
international
human
rights
law
-
The
Last
Utopia:
Human
Rights
in
History
scholarship
on
international
human
rights
law
and
its
history
has
been
shaken.
Rather
than
focusing
on
the
age-old
debate
on
the
relationship
of
humanitarianism
to
human
rights
(Moyn:
2013),
Moyns
2010
study
has
demanded
a
shift
of
focus
that
brings
to
light
questions
that
touch
directly
on
the
contemporary
era.
Amongst
these
questions
and
lines
of
inquiry
the
one
that
stands
out
in
its
significance
for
the
2014
Historical
Materialism
conference
has
been
that
which
interrogates
the
relationship
between
the
international
human
rights
movement
and
neoliberalism.
Yet,
despite
being
alternatively
seen
as
frre
enemis
(Moyn:
2013),
historical
companions
(Wills:
2014)
or
competing
sites
of
hegemonic
contestation
(Marks:
2012),
contemporary
accounts
fail
to
consider
the
relationship
systematically
as
one
of
mutual
constitution
existing
within
the
same
ensemble
of
social
relations.
To
ameliorate
this
state
of
affairs
this
paper
will
argue
that
lessons
ought
to
be
learned
from
the
research
agenda
of
Antonio
Gramsci
in
relation
to
the
development
of
Italian
capitalism
of
the
19th
century.
In
particular,
drawing
on
three
historical
vignettes
(the
1970s
rise
of
the
human
rights
movement
in
the
Southern
Cone,
the
1980s
incorporation
of
human
rights
with
structural
adjustment
programs,
and
the
late
1980s
turn
by
the
World
Bank
to
the
social)
this
paper
will
suggest
that
the
concept
of
transformismo
which
Gramsci
invoked
to
describe
the
tactic
of
co-optation,
pacification
and
eventual
decapitation
of
progressive
tendencies
by
the
powers
that
be,
provides
a
particularly
apt
theoretical
tool
to
explain
the
tendencies
within
international
human
rights
law
that
propagated
from
the
late
1970s
to
the
early
1990s.
And
in
so
doing,
this
paper
hopes
to
contribute
to
the
general
thematic
of
the
conference
and
suggest
ways
in
which
transformative
forces
may
consider
interacting
with
human
rights
while
at
the
same
time
avoiding
such
engagements
co-optive
potential.
Despina
Koutsoumba
&
Panagiotis
Sotiris
building
the
party
or
tactical
electoral
fronts,
we
suggest
-based
upon
our
experience
both
positive
and
negative
from
the
attempts
to
facilitate
the
realignment
of
the
anticapitalist
Left
in
Greece
but
also
upon
important
new
theoretical
contributions
to
these
debates
-
the
need
to
think
exactly
of
new,
original,
necessarily
contradictory,
democratic
variations
of
the
united
front
strategy
as
laboratories,
knowledge
processes
and
facilitators
of
the
encounter
between
struggles,
discourses
and
anticapitalist
strategies.
Benjamin
Kunkel
The
idea
of
a
stationary
state
or
growthless
economy
has
haunted
the
margins
of
economic
thought
since
the
early
days
of
industrial
or
fossil
capitalism,
discussed
suggestively,
but
not
systematically,
by
Smith,
Ricardo,
Mill,
and
others.
Since
the
1970s
and
especially
over
the
past
decade,
the
prospectwelcomed
of
fearedof
an
end
to
growth
has
gained
new
prominence.
How
is
a
stationary
or
steady-state
economy
to
be
conceivedin
GDP
or
biophysical
terms?
Is
the
end
of
per
capita
growth
a
medium-term
possibility?
If
so,
what
would
bring
it
about?
A
confluence
of
factors
make
the
arrival
of
a
stationary
state
within
this
century,
for
many
advanced
economies
if
not
the
entire
world,
a
plausible
though
hardly
certain
development.
These
factors
include
geologically
or
politically
imposed
limits
to
fossil
fuel
extraction;
declining
productivity
gains
from
the
greater
share
of
services
in
the
economy
relative
to
agriculture
and
industry;
an
arrest
or
even
reversal
of
industrial
productivity
through
higher
energy
costs;
the
threat
to
agricultural
production
from
costly
energy
and
environmental
degradation;
climate-induced
damage
to
infrastructure;
and
the
economically
depressive
effects
of
a
surplus
population
idled
by
the
unavailability
of
waged
work.
The
political
opportunities
and
risks
of
a
stationary
state
are
worth
considering.
Is
it
true,
as
Schumpeter
said,
that
a
stationary
capitalism
would
be
a
contradictio
in
adjecto?
Ora
grim
scenariomight
capital
accumulation
outlast
growth?
Growthlessness
would
open
up
a
new
terrain
for
left
strategy.
Private
profit,
and
financial
profit
in
particular,
may
seem
less
tolerable
to
a
general
public
that
sees
itself
losing
a
zero-
sum
game:
an
opening
for
the
international
left
(as
well
as
the
chauvinist
right).
The
liquidity
preference
of
private
capital
would
likely
increase
where
overall
growth
is
not
assured,
lending
a
further
rationale
to
the
socialization
of
investment.
The
reduction
of
average
working
hours
would
be
another
attractive
and
rational
choice
where
consumption
of
physical
goods
was
flat
or
falling.
Yet
a
society
no
longer
expanding
in
terms
of
biophysical
throughput
(Herman
Daly)
might
still
provide
an
equal
or
even
wider
array
of
so-called
services,
commodified
or
not.
A
service-heavy
economy
is
by
no
means
naturally
or
inevitably
egalitarian,
but
may
be
more
conducive
to
socialism
or
communism
than
past
economies
in
which
industry
and
agriculture
bulked
larger.
(A
purpose
of
the
present
paper
is
to
outline
the
reasoning
behind
this
suggestion.)
Mill
wrote
in
1848
that
he
did
not
regard
the
stationary
state
of
capital
and
wealth
with
the
unaffected
aversion
so
generally
manifested
toward
it
by
political
economists
of
the
old
school.
I
am
inclined
to
believe
that
it
would
be,
on
the
whole,
a
very
considerable
improvement
of
our
condition.
One
question
for
the
century
ahead
is
whether
socialists
can
arrive
at
the
same
conclusion
by
different
means,
proper
to
our
tradition
and
consistent
with
the
times.
Silvia
L.
Lpez
In
this
talk
I
wish
to
tackle
the
historical
question
of
capitalisms
resilience
by
returning
to
the
fundamental
concept
of
progress.
The
prospects
of
socialist
strategy
in
our
times
(continue
to)
depend
to
a
large
extent
on
the
way
progress
is
appreciated.
Different
understanding
of
progress
entail
different
strategic
resolutions:
a
fatalistic
belief
in
progress
as
an
unstoppable
development
a
belief
which
is
today
largely
extinct
entails
a
reformist
politics,
leading
to
post-capitalism;
historical
pessimism
and
disillusion,
on
the
other
hand,
bring
forth
either
resignation
or
a
desperate,
sometimes
messianic
search
for
loopholes
that
will
allow
an
escape
from
a
nearly
inevitable
doom.
A
third
approach,
which
I
deem
more
properly
dialectical
and
in
tune
with
Marxist
thought,
vigorously
defends
progress
but
only
as
a
possibility.
Here,
progress
is
seen
as
both
immanent
to
capitalist
history
and
at
the
same
time
as
only
potential,
facing
enormous
obstacles
and
powerful
enemies.
If
progress
is
to
be
enacted,
revolutionary
transformation
will
be
essential
but
not
as
some
voluntaristic
gesture.
Rather,
revolutionary
political
action
is
called
upon
to
activate
and
fulfill
the
real
contradictions
and
potentialities
which
capitalist
history
itself
both
harbors
and
frustrates.
These
ideas
will
be
discussed
with
reference
to
key
questions
associated
with
the
idea
of
progress
material
civilization,
technological
advance,
or
the
historical
significance
of
fascism
and
to
several
seminal
interpretations
of
history
and
progress,
as
propounded
by
such
authors
as
Karl
Marx,
Friedrich
Nietzsche,
Bertolt
Brecht,
Walter
Benjamin,
and
J.
R.
R.
Tolkien.
Sean Larson
in
the
1930s,
the
problem
of
representation
continues
to
have
political
and
strategic
consequences.
Rooted
as
it
is
in
a
rigorous
analysis
of
capitalism,
whatever
form
it
takes,
the
Brechtian
method
of
representation
still
has
much
to
teach
us."
Nick
Lawrence
Uneven
and
Combined
Development:
Commodity
Survival
and
the
Colonized
Everyday
in
Postwar
Critical
Theory
Writing
in
1961
toward
the
close
of
the
second
volume
of
his
sociological
study
of
_la
vie
quotidienne_,
Henri
Lefebvre
makes
emphatic
his
assertion
that
critique
of
everyday
life
generalizes
[the]
experience
of
the
backward
or
underdeveloped
nations
and
extends
it
to
the
everyday
in
the
highly
developed
industrial
countries.
In
adapting
Trotskys
terminology
of
uneven
and
combined
development
to
the
situation
of
colonized
lifeworlds
in
core
and
periphery
alike,
Lefebvre
points
up
the
pressures,
evacuations
and
asymmetries
of
the
concept
of
the
everyday
at
the
moment
when
it
achieves
definition
as
a
focused
object
of
analysis.
This
paper
examines
the
stress
tests
put
to
the
everyday
as
both
frontline
and
back-formation
of
capitals
advance
into
hitherto
unoccupied
territory,
primarily
in
the
work
of
Lefebvre,
but
also
of
Adorno,
Debord
and
such
Marxist-feminists
as
Silvia
Federici,
Selma
James
and
Mariarosa
Dallacosta.
Addressing
related
problems
of
work
and
leisure,
the
division
of
labour
and
the
question
of
social
reproduction,
these
thinkers
grapple
above
all
with
the
logic
of
capitals
simultaneous
production
of
homogeneity
and
inequality
as
this
logic
pertains
to
the
commodification
of
everyday
life.
It
is
in
and
through
the
colonization
of
the
everyday,
their
analyses
suggest,
that
the
commodity-form
extends
its
reach.
Athanasios
Lazarou
"At
the
height
of
the
Eurozone
crisis
in
2011
protestors
scaled
the
Acropolis
to
place
a
banner
against
the
Greek
governments
austerity
policies.
Presented
in
full
view
to
the
rooftop
caf
of
Greeces
most
prominent
Eurozone
project
Bernard
Tschumis
New
Acropolis
Museum
the
demonstration
highlighted
the
visible
role
of
architecture
in
facilitating
events
during
the
political
crisis.
This
paper
engages
the
dialogue
between
these
monumental
architectural
objects
as
products
of
the
contradictions
of
capitalism
expressed
during
a
crisis;
where
changes
in
spatial
syntax
conceive
themselves
through
temporary
or
semi-permanent
interventions
under
the
conditions
of
event.
Expanding
upon
spatial
dialectics,
the
paper
presents
architecture
as
both
subject
and
object
of
its
own
historical
transformation.
To
resolve
the
antithetical
position
of
the
two
terms
subject
and
object,
the
paper
employs
Henri
Lefebvres
notion
of
space
as
concrete
abstraction
to
demonstrate
that
as
capitalism
comes
under
crisis,
events
can
be
understood
as
systems
of
measurement
for
spatial
registrations
of
change
and
the
re-organisation
of
spatial
relations.
Critically,
the
event
is
being
propositioned
from
the
philosophical
principle
of
a
'break'
to
question
the
link
between
theory
and
built
forms
regarding
architectural
outputs
against
ideological
outputs."
Paul
LeBlanc
The
truism
without
revolutionary
theory,
there
can
be
no
revolutionary
movement
poses
a
challenge
for
activists
in
the
tradition
of
Lenin,
Luxemburg,
and
Trotsky.
All
too
often
such
activists
fetishize
the
ideas
of
these
revolutionary
heroes
without
being
able
to
connect
them
to
the
material
realities
and
practical
struggles
of
our
own
time.
Their
relevance
in
twenty-first
century
contexts
requires
the
development
of
concepts
that
can
guide
practical
efforts
in
the
face
of
new
realities.
Notions
developed
by
cultural
anthropologists
intersect
with
Marxist
theorizations
to
suggest
the
analytical
concept
of
radical
labor
subculture.
This
will
be
illustrated
by
reference
to
U.S.
labor
history.
The
actuality
of
this
radical
labor
subculture
was
essential
in
the
development
of
radical
class-consciousness
within
the
U.S.
working
class,
and
sheds
light
on
the
growth
of
the
powerful
and
influential
left-wing
currents
within
the
mainstream
of
the
U.S.
labor
movement
from
the
1860s
through
the
1930s.
Political,
economic,
social,
and
cultural
transformations
stretching
from
the
1940s
through
the
1960s
resulted
in
the
erosion
and
decline
of
that
subculture,
with
a
consequent
disconnect
of
left-wing
radicalism
from
the
working
class.
Political,
social
and
economic
transformations
since
the
1970s
have
generated
cultural
shifts
and
openings
that
appear
to
be
feeding
into
the
re-creation
of
a
new
radical
labor
subculture.
A
blending
of
such
insights
with
the
classical
Marxist
strategic
orientation
may
provide
a
path
forward
for
the
creation
of
a
mass
movement
capable
of
challenging
capitalism.
Tobin
LeBlanc
Haley
Pathologizing
Mad
Women:
A
feminist
political
economy
analysis
of
the
role
of
biopsychiatry
in
the
neoliberal
age
"Effects
of
neoliberal
policy
trends
for
mad
women
are
erased
through
the
mobilization
of
bio-psychiatry.
Marxist
scholarship
documents
the
symbiotic
relationship
between
biopsychiatry
and
neoliberalism
(e.g.
Cohen
2014).
Yet
there
is
an
absence
of
scholarship
on
the
regulation
of
the
gender
order
by
biopsychiatry.
Critiques
of
the
role
of
biopsychiatry
in
stabilizing
a
(gendered)
social
order
necessary
to
capitalism
were
popular
in
the
last
century
(Busfield
1986,
1996,
DUren
1997).
Recently,
these
critiques
have
waned
despite
the
strengthening
of
the
biomedical
model
of
health
under
neoliberalism
(Raphael
&
Curry-
Stevens
2009).
This
paper
explores
how
gendered
neoliberal
trends
are
enacted
and
how
the
effects
are
neutralized
in
the
lives
of
mad
women
through
the
mobilization
of
bio-psychiatry.
This
paper
uses
archival
and
documentary
research
and
data
from
interviews
with
mad
people
The
Natural
Ontology
of
Commodification:
How
Could
Commodity
Be
Our
Own
Identity?
The
aim
of
my
presentation
is
to
analyze
the
relationship
between
the
logic
of
commodity
form
and
subjectivity.
Marxs
conceptualization
of
fetishism
was
an
attempt
to
understand
the
effect
of
commodity
form
producing
the
formal
equality.
The
problem
of
commodity
form
is
the
fetishism
of
the
equal
exchanges
by
which
everything
is
simply
transformed
into
an
equalized
value
whatever
its
substantive
differences
in
use
value.
Lukcas
developed
further
the
theory
of
reification
from
Marxs
discussion
of
commodity
fetishism
and
defined
its
essential
aspect
as
the
ghostly
objectivity
of
commodity
form.
Recounting
Marxist
theorization
of
commodification,
I
would
like
to
focus
on
how
commodity
form
reinforces
the
fetishistic
status
of
subjectivity
through
consumerism.
Most
of
critical
approach
to
consumerism
has
seemed
to
shed
light
on
the
immorality
of
market-centered
economic
system
or
the
pleasure
principle
of
consumers
ignorant
to
the
cruelty
of
capitalism.
From
this
perspective,
I
will
critically
consider
Evgeny
Pashukanis
theory
of
the
relation
between
commodity
form
and
legal
system.
The
limit
of
his
theory
is
undeniable
in
understanding
the
procedure
of
the
subjectivation,
but
still
insightful
for
theorizing
the
natural
ontology
of
commodities.
My
contention
is
that
the
logic
of
commodity
form
is
closely
related
to
the
legalization
of
political
economy
in
capitalism
and
the
normalization
of
the
truth
of
a
market
for
everyday
life.
Pashukanis
claims,
all
law
was
inherently
related
to
the
commodity
exchange
relationship
which
reaches
its
highest
point
under
capitalism
(Michael
Head,
2008).
I
think
his
understanding
of
the
legal
form
is
useful
to
delve
into
the
secret
of
commodity
form,
which
naturalizes
capitalism.
Emanuele
Leonardi
Carbon
Trading
Dogma:
Financial
Dimensions
and
Political
Implications
of
Global
Carbon
Markets
"The
paper
presents
two
interrelated
sections.
In
the
first,
global
carbon
markets
are
historically
contextualized,
analytically
described
and
politically
articulated
against
the
background
of
a
twofold
hypothesis:
a)
the
process
of
progressive
marketization
of
climate
change
occurs
in
connection
with
the
emergence
of
a
new
modality
of
value
production
(which
can
be
generically
defined
as
'cognitive
capitalism');
b)
the
governance
of
contemporary
circuits
of
valorization
tends
to
be
located
within
the
financial
sphere
and
Lih
Nancy Lindisfarne
Locascio
Why
the
Commodity
Form
Doesn't
Die:
An
Introduction
to
the
work
of
Wolfgang
Pohrt
Completely
unknown
to
English-speaking
audiences,
Wolfgang
Pohrt
is
one
of
the
major
figures
in
the
German
radical
left
to
emerge
from
SDS
and
the
tradition
of
the
Frankfurt
School.
Achieving
his
greatest
prominence
as
a
polemical
essayist
in
the
1980s
attacking
the
resurgence
of
nationalist
and
reactionary
ideology
in
the
German
peace
and
early
Green
movements,
his
writing
career
is
bookended
by
two
theoretical
works,
1976's
The
Theory
of
Use-Value,
a
recasting
of
the
totally
administered
world
thesis
of
the
Frankfurt
School
in
more
explicitly
Marxological
terms,
and
1995's
Brothers
in
Crime:
People
in
the
Age
of
their
Superfluity,
an
examination
of
the
racket
as
the
form
of
social
organization
predating
capitalism
and
characterizing
capitalism
in
its
decline.
In
his
pessimistic
assessment
of
the
foreclosure
of
revolutionary
possibility
in
late
capitalism,
as
well
as
his
pursuit
of
a
ruthless
criticism
of
the
ideological
degeneration
of
the
German
New
Left
into
Green
capitalism
and
national
renewal,
Pohrt
represents
the
most
authentic
heir
of
the
tradition
of
critical
theory."
Larry
Lohmann
Neoliberalism's Climate
Popular
unrest
over
climate
change
is
a
threat
to
capital
accumulation
in
that
it
implicitly
challenges
the
amplified
labour
exploitation
and
speedier
circulation
that
became
possible
in
the
19th
century
through
thermodynamic
energy
and
fossil
fuels.
The
cobbled-together
official
responses
to
this
challenge
that
have
emerged
in
the
past
two
decades
pre-
eminently,
national
and
international
carbon
markets
partake
of
virtually
all
of
the
characteristic
elements
of
neoliberalism.
They
assume
that
tackling
social
issues
is
largely
a
matter
of
discovering
prices
inhering
in
new
commodities
developed
for
the
purpose
(in
this
case
pollution
allowances
and
offsets).
The
commodities
themselves
are
treated,
via
a
typically
neoliberal
fetish,
as
if
they
created
and
produced
themselves
automatically
(or
as
if
they
were
unproblematic
translations
of
ecological
or
social
goods
into
a
quantifiable
and
circulatable
form),
while
at
the
same
time
the
most
strenuous
and
violent
efforts
are
devoted
to
constructing
the
institutions
needed
to
define,
maintain
and
defend
them
through
dispossession
and
exploitation.
Given
the
role
of
the
state
in
creating
demand,
guaranteeing
supply,
and
underwriting
the
profits
of
a
galaxy
of
private-sector
partners,
contractors,
consultants
and
technocrats
who
carry
out
most
of
the
work
of
producing,
circulating,
standardizing
and
regulating
the
new
commodities,
conventional
dualisms
opposing
state
and
market
have
become
of
as
little
use
in
analyzing
climate
policy
as
they
are
in
understanding
other
areas
of
neoliberal
policy.
Not
least,
the
new
markets
follow
the
general
thrust
of
neoliberalism
in
that
they
help
both
state
and
corporate
actors
evade
much
of
the
burden
of
addressing
the
social
problems
that
the
markets
are
advertised
as
cheaply
solving,
while
simultaneously
holding
out
the
promise
of
expanding
and
deepening
opportunities
for
capital
accumulation
at
a
time
of
profound
crisis
and
sclerosis.
Evan
Loker
Starting
with
a
review
of
several
key
debates
within
the
Brazilian
social
sciences
(which
Schwarz
has
been
engaging
with
since
his
formative
years),
several
of
his
early
interventions
will
be
re-examined.
In
doing
so,
I
will
emphasize
how
Schwarzs
theories
are
solutions
to
the
aporia
resulting
from
the
application
of
dominant
theoretical
models
to
peripheral
countries
such
as
Brazil.
Returning
to
the
(largely)
heterodox
and
neo-Marxian
debates
on
historiography
and
capitalist
development
within
Brazil
is
essential
for
understanding
both
the
larger
significance
of
notions
like
the
misplaced
idea
and
the
manner
in
which
Schwarz
pioneered
a
cultural
sociology
in
the
manner
of
Theodor
Adorno
(one
of
Schwarzs
early
mentors).
The
innovative
aspects
examined
in
the
early
essays
on
culture
and
aesthetic
theory
anticipate
the
later
turn
to
value
theory
in
the
early
1990s,
culminating
in
Schwarzs
influential
essay
on
Robert
Kurzs
1991
book,
The
Collapse
of
Modernization.
I
hope
to
show
how
Schwarzs
engagement
with
Kurz
marks
a
fundamental
shift
within
his
theoretical
framework
as
a
whole;
specifically,
in
his
move
away
from
viewing
Brazils
paradoxical
modernity
through
the
lens
of
dependency-theory,
toward
the
critique
of
modernization
outlined
in
Kurzs
text.
It
will
become
clear
in
the
process
how
much
of
Schwarzs
recent
work
has
been
concerned
with
grasping
how
Brazils
recent
history
as
well
as
the
Brazilian
affects
and
experiences
condensed
in
its
cultural
objects
are
also
moments
in
the
history
of
capitals
larger,
contradictory
dynamics
and
developments.
The
task
will
not
be
intervening
into
intellectual
history
for
its
own
sake,
so
much
as
distilling
the
significance
and
implications
of
social
process
as
developed
within
the
critical
writings
of
Roberto
Schwarz."
Ottokar
Luban
Workers
in
January
1919,
the
Uprising
in
Berlin
on
November
9th
1919).
I
will
emphasize
the
special
social,
economic,
mental
and
political
conditions
of
the
late
German
Empire
in
war
time
hindering
or
supporting
the
development
towards
revolutionary
mass
movements.
In
case
of
an
outbreak
of
war
a
unanimously
approved
resolution
of
the
International
Socialist
Congress
of
1907
obliged
the
socialist
parties
to
intervene
in
favor
of
its
speedy
termination,
and
to
do
all
in
their
power
to
utilize
the
economic
and
political
crisis
caused
by
the
war
to
rouse
the
people
and
thereby
to
hasten
the
abolition
of
capitalist
class
rule.
While
the
majority
of
the
German
Social
Democratic
leadership
and
of
its
Reichstag
group
gave
up
its
oppositional
politics
and
supported
the
war
efforts
of
the
imperial
government
a
little
group
around
Rosa
Luxemburg,
Karl
Liebknecht,
Clara
Zetkin
and
Franz
Mehring
-
due
to
the
resolution
of
the
Socialist
International
-
tried
to
win
the
party
back
for
an
antimilitaristic
policy.
Slowly
this
tiny
minority
was
joined
by
more
and
more
other
militants
in
the
party.
Finally
this
growing
minority
was
kicked
off
the
Social
Democratic
Party
of
Germany
(SPD)
and
was
forced
to
found
an
own
party
the
Independent
Party
of
Germany
(USPD)
in
April
1917.
The
paper
will
show
the
efforts
of
the
left
socialists
(Spartacus
Group,
Bremen
Left
Radicals,
Revolutionary
Shop
Stewards,
and
left
Centrists)
in
the
inner
party
struggles
for
an
offensive
anti
war
policy
(August
1914-April
1917)
and
their
clandestine
activities
to
initiate
mass
actions
for
peace
and
democracy
(Bread
Strike
in
April
1917,
Mass
Strike
of
the
Ammunition
Workers
in
January
1919,
the
Uprising
in
Berlin
on
November
9th
1919).
I
will
emphasize
the
special
social,
economic,
mental
and
political
conditions
of
the
late
German
Empire
in
war
time
time
(especially
the
hard
suppression
by
the
military
and
police
authorities,
the
immense
war
propaganda
in
99
%
of
the
media,
the
more
and
more
increasing
food
shortage)
hindering
or
supporting
the
development
towards
revolutionary
mass
movements."
Lutz
Luithlen
Marx
and
crises
in
capitalism
The
aim
of
this
paper
is
to
show
that
Marxs
writings
on
economic
crises
in
Capital
are
still
relevant
and
instructive.
The
paper
starts
with
an
introduction
to
the
dynamics
of
capitalist
crises
as
rooted
in
the
inherent
contradictions
of
capitalist
development.
It
then
sets
out
the
major
events
during
the
build-up
to
the
financial
(sub-prime)
crisis
between
2000
and
2010
and
invites
Marx
to
comment
on
both
events
and
circumstances
to
be
followed
by
an
investigation
into
Marxs
own
categories
of
interest-bearing
capital
in
the
light
of
the
financial
weapons
of
mass
destruction
that
fuelled
the
debt-laden
investment
boom.
Finally,
the
question
of
the
relative
detachment
of
the
financial
system
from
its
bedrock
of
production
will
be
addressed.
The
conclusion
is
that,
although
Marx
could
not
have
anticipated
the
particular
form
of
modern
financial
instruments,
the
strategies,
excesses
and
trickeries
of
modern
finance
can
be
read
off
his
script.
David Mabb
Lewis
From
the
Anti-Imperialist
Left
to
the
Social-Chauvinist
Right:
the
Die
Glocke
group
and
the
theory
of
imperialism
"100
years
on
from
the
outbreak
of
World
War
I,
this
presentation
will
contend
that
the
ideas
of
the
German
social
chauvinists
are
worth
revisiting,
interrogating
and
understanding.
Obviously
this
will
be
because
German
nationalism
and
social
imperialism
are
ways
forward
for
our
movement
today,
but
because
the
transformation
of
some
of
those
around
Parvuss
social-chauvinist
publication,
Die
Glocke,
from
staunchly
anti-imperialist
lefts
in
the
pre-
war
SPD
to
some
of
the
biggest
cheerleaders
of
a
German
victory
during
that
horrific
war
raises
a
number
of
important
and
interesting
questions:
not
least
regarding
the
Marxist
theory
of
imperialism
and
its
development
within
the
Second
International.
How
could
it
come
to
pass
that
politicians
such
as
Konrad
Haenisch,
Paul
Lensch
and
Parvus
-
once
all
champions
of
the
anti-imperialist
left
of
the
SPD
-
could
embrace
the
August
4
vote
for
war
credits
and
war
socialism
and
even
on
occasion
see
this
position
as
a
continuation
of
their
pre-1914
anti-imperialist
politics?
How
were
concrete
assessments
of
the
political
situation
and
the
global
powers
involved
in
WWI
transformed
into
an
overarching
theory
of
imperialism
and
world
policy?
How
were
the
categories
of
Marxism
deployed
to
justify
such
positions?
What
are
the
continuities
and
discontinuities
between
the
positions
adopted
by
this
group
in
the
pre-war
congresses
of
the
SPD
and
those
during
WWI?
Based
on
recent
research
and
translation
work
conducted
with
Ben
Lewis,
this
paper
will
explore
these
questions.
It
will
analyse
the
groups
understanding
of
imperialism
and
war
against
the
backdrop
of
the
extensive
debates
in
the
Second
International,
seeking
to
draw
out
the
implications
of
these
controversies
for
thinking
about
imperialism
and
anti-
imperialism
today."
Ewa Majewska
Nivedita
Majumdar
The
recent
economic
crisis
showed
yet
again
that
class
contradictions
remain
as
central
to
our
current
economic
moment
they
were
in
the
pages
of
Marxs
Capital.
The
system's
smooth
functioning
relies
on
an
obfuscation
of
the
role
of
class
both
by
the
state
and
in
civic
institutions
and
culture.
Academia
in
general,
and
culture
studies,
in
particular,
participates
in
the
undermining
of
class
politics.
David
Harvey
notes
that
in
academia,
the
broad
adhesion
to
postmodern
and
post-structuralist
ideas
which
celebrate
the
particular
at
the
expense
of
big
picture
participate
in
a
similar
obfuscation
of
class
contradictions.
A
key
claim
that
is
made
is
that
universal
categories
like
class
are
incompatible
with
a
nuanced
appreciation
of
everyday
culture.
I
discuss
the
marginalization
of
the
category
of
class
in
postcolonial
theory.
Postcolonial
theory
emerged,
in
crucial
ways,
as
a
discourse
that
defined
itself
in
opposition
to
Marxism.
It
privileges
the
marginalized
elements
of
social
structures;
thus
its
emphasis
on
the
study
of
the
local
or
the
"fragment."
Conversely,
postcolonial
theory
is
characterized
by
its
rejection
of
the
idea
of
human
nature,
by
questioning
the
concept
of
human
rights,
and
by
its
demotion
of
class
to
a
peripheral
status.
Through
analyses
of
industrial
strikes
and
social
movements
in
India
and
the
UK,
I
question
the
posited
binary
between
the
structural
and
the
experiential.
Contrary
to
the
basic
assumptions
of
postcolonial
theory,
I
argue
that
universal
categories
like
class
are
compatible
with
a
nuanced
appreciation
of
everyday
culture.
Andreas
Malm
Steamroll
all
the
brutes:
Fossil
energy
and
British
imperialism
in
the
nineteenth
century
"Poor
people
in
the
peripheries
of
the
world-economy
suffer
most
from
global
warming.
This
has
lead
some
to
suggest
that
rich
nations
have
amassed
a
climate
debt
by
engaging
in
fossil
fuel-based
development,
the
by-products
of
which
now
fall
from
the
sky
onto
the
poor,
who
have
reaped
none
of
the
benefits.
Others
retort
that
two
centuries
of
such
development
have
in
fact
created
the
opportunities
for
everyone
to
leap
into
modernity
witness
China
and
India,
or
even
countries
such
as
Nigeria
and
Egypt
and
so
the
advanced
economies
should
be
thanked
for
their
services,
or
at
least
walk
free
from
any
special
duties
to
slash
emissions
or
compensate
victims.
In
the
annually
recurring
clashes
between
rich
and
poor
nations
over
the
sharing
of
climate
burdens,
history
is
never
far
from
view
but
it
is
rarely
explored
in
any
depth.
How
did
the
fossil
economy
first
reach
the
shores
of
the
peripheries?
What
happened
when
the
English
tradition
of
coal
combustion
spread
to
other
parts
of
the
world?
What
did
fossil
fuel-based
development
really
mean
for
those
on
the
receiving
end
of
steamboats
and
railroads,
coalmines
and
cotton
spinning
machines?
Until
the
first
Anglo-Burmese
war
in
1824,
the
British
maritime
empire
had
been
sailing
with
the
whims
of
the
wind.
Dependency
on
sail
locked
it
in
a
near
military
balance
with
some
of
its
peripheral
adversaries,
severely
restricting
the
reach
of
British
trade:
unable
to
penetrate
rivers
upstream,
merchants
were
often
relegated
to
the
coastal
margins
of
potentially
vast
markets
at
the
mercy
of
domestic
rulers,
the
factories
at
Canton
being
the
archetypal
example.
The
rise
of
the
steamboat
in
imperial
warfare
changed
all
this.
By
relying
on
coal
an
energy
source
oblivious
to
weather
and
landscape
the
British
Empire
could
use
waterways
to
break
into
the
interior
of
continents
and
smash
resistance
from
fleets
and
armies
incapable
of
withstanding
the
novel
force.
In
China,
the
steamboats
forced
their
way
up
to
Nanking
and
opened
the
Celestial
Empire
for
trade;
in
India,
natives
were
herded
into
coalmines
to
extract
the
fuels
for
the
boats,
the
much
faster
to
ship
out
wealth
from
the
colony;
in
Nigeria,
armed
crews
drove
inland
to
seize
control
over
the
production
of
palm
oil
a
crucial
lubricant
for
steam-engines
and
other
machines
and
defeat
tribal
guerrillas;
in
Egypt,
Muhammed
Alis
experiment
in
industrial
modernisation
was
shattered
by
the
grenades
from
coal-fired
warships.
By
exploring
the
role
of
fossil
energy
on
some
of
the
frontiers
of
imperial
expansion
in
the
second
quarter
of
the
nineteenth
century,
this
paper
will
seek
to
radicalise
the
notion
of
climate
debt.
When
a
drought
becomes
permanent
or
the
sea
submerges
a
delta,
it
is
not
the
first
time
people
in
the
peripheries
suffer
the
consequences
of
fossil
fuel
combustion,
nor
is
such
development
a
train
to
modernity
that
has
merely
passed
them
by.
They
were
run
over
from
day
one:
fossil
energy
an
indispensible
source
of
power
for
the
appropriation
of
resources
from
the
peripheries,
the
history
of
the
imperialist
world-order
is
written
in
letters
of
coal
and
fire.
On
a
global
scale,
the
longue
dure
of
the
fossil
economy
begins
with
the
devastation
of
Akka
by
British
steamboats
in
1840
and
continues
in
the
next
extreme
weather
event
to
ravage
communities
and
set
back
development
by
several
decades
in
the
Philippines
or
Haiti.
The
political
purpose
of
such
a
historiography
is,
of
course,
to
fan
the
flames
of
climate
militancy
in
the
peripheries;
the
theoretical
resources
for
it,
drawn
on
in
this
paper,
are
Rosa
Luxemburgs
theories
of
imperialism,
Ernest
Mandels
sketches
on
the
role
of
energy
in
the
long
waves
of
capitalist
development,
and
the
debates
between
political
Marxism
and
world-systems
theory.
Grant
Mandarino
One of the very few true originals of our time: Reviving Eduard Fuchs
"Outside
of
Walter
Benjamins
1937
article
Eduard
Fuchs,
Collector
and
Historian,
commissioned
by
Max
Horkheimer
for
the
Zeitschrift
fr
Sozialforschung,
the
life
and
works
of
Eduard
Fuchs
(1870-1940)
remain
little
known
among
Marxist
cultural
historians
and
theorists.
Fuchs
was
a
key
player
on
the
German
left
his
entire
life,
from
joining
the
outlawed
Sozialistiche
Arbeiterpartei
in
his
hometown
of
Stuttgart
as
a
journeyman
printer
in
1886
to
his
decisive
role
in
the
formation
of
the
Kommunistische
Partei
Deutschlands
in
1918-1919
and
subsequent
activity
in
the
Right
Opposition
after
1928.
His
time
as
editor
of
the
popular
satirical
newspaper
Suddeutsche
Postillon
and
publication
of
numerous
illustrated
histories
of
satirical
and
erotic
imagery
brought
him
notoriety,
a
substantial
amount
of
money,
and
multiple
prison
sentences.
The
artist
George
Grosz,
who
met
Fuchs
for
the
first
time
in
the
early
1920s,
later
described
him
as
one
of
the
very
few
true
originals
of
our
time,
yet
he
is
today
remembered,
if
at
all,
as
a
collector
of
objets
dart
and
a
somewhat
nave
historian
of
social
mores.
This
is
largely
the
result
of
Benjamins
assessment
of
Fuchs,
which,
as
Frederic
J.
Schwartz
has
argued,
is
less
about
Fuchs
himself
and
more
about
the
methods
he
employs
in
his
various
writings,
in
Benjamins
view
wholly
representative
of
the
cruder
aspects
of
historical
materialism
as
theorized
by
reformist
Social
Democrats.
More
recent
studies,
such
as
Ulrich
Weitzs
Eduard
Fuchs:
Der
Mann
im
Schatten
(2014),
take
the
opposite
view,
placing
Fuchs
at
the
center
of
Weimars
left-wing
milieu
as
a
uniquely
charismatic
individual
whose
historical
significance
is
not
reducible
to
broader
structures
of
thought.
Weitz
succeeds
in
presenting
a
more
favorable
view
of
Fuchs
as
a
person,
but
fails
to
show
why
we
should
care
about
Fuchs
as
a
cultural
historian.
While
a
revival
of
interest
in
Fuchs
is
to
be
welcomed,
especially
outside
of
Germany,
the
question
remains:
how
should
one
engage
his
work?
My
paper
takes
up
this
question
by
reassessing
Benjamins
evaluation
of
Fuchs
art
historical
methods,
playing
particular
attention
to
the
histories
of
caricature
Fuchs
published
and
how
these
studies
influenced
the
practice
and
interpretation
of
satirical
imagery
within
the
Communist
milieu
during
the
Weimar
period."
Jaleh
Mansoor
"This
paper
explores
the
lacunae
between
theories
of
bare
life
on
the
one
hand
and
debates
around
histories
of
capitalist
accumulation
and
subsumption
on
the
other
through
a
case
studies
of
the
work
of
controversial
Spanish
artist
Santiago
Sierras
practice,
a
cultural
mediation
that
locates
key
shifts
in
political
economy
in
Europe
and
the
United
States
in
an
era
of
globalization
and
migration.
This
paper
thus
asks
the
following
questions:
How
can
Marxist
theory
be
transformed
to
integrate
an
understanding
of
corporeality,
identity,
and
subjectivity
in
its
analysis
of
capitalism
and
class
politics?
Much
of
Spanish
artist
Santiago
Sierras
practice
addresses
the
fundamental
violence
inscribed
in
the
wage
relation,
in
which
surplus
value
necessary
to
the
expansion
of
capital
is
extracted
through
labor
and
compensated
in
a
self
reproducing
matrix
of
remuneration
reticulated
to
time
in
which
the
worker
works
against
her
own
interest.
A
2004
piece
entitled
584
Horas
de
Trabajo
(584
Hours
of
Work)
sets
the
problem
of
labor
against
the
art
work
in
a
retort
to
the
legacy
of
minimalist
sculpture,
one
of
the
last
traditional
artistic
idioms
of
the
20th
Century.
By
documenting
the
man-hours
spent
constructing
a
massive
cubic
monument
mimicking
those
of
Tony
Smith,
Richard
Serra,
and
Carl
Andre
emblazoned
on
the
side,
Sierra
undermines
the
myth
of
any
solidarity
between
minimalism
and
labor,
a
false
solidarity
that
has
underscored
the
canonization
of
American
minimalists
in
accounts
such
as
Art
Workers
(2011).
At
the
same
time,
Sierra
explores
the
ways
in
which
the
imposition
of
the
wage
is
compounded
by
constraints
imposed
by
the
state:
citizenship,
il/legality,
immigration.
The
double
bind
of
the
state-to-market
relation
which
binds
the
wage
against
illegal
forms
of
survival
and
thereby
enforced
it
is
Sierras
projects
primary
problem-set.
In
June
2001,
Sierra
collected
133
persons
to
take
part
in
his
project
for
the
Spanish
Pavilion
at
the
49th
Venice
Biennale.
Sierras
action,
which
took
place
on
the
opening
day
of
this
auspicious
art
world
event,
entailed
his
directing
the
men
to
an
area
in
the
Arsenale
where
he
bleached
all
133
persons
hair,
producing
a
visibly
artificial
appearance,
in
effect
marking
each
person
as
though
with
a
yellow
highlighter.
The
delimiting
criteria
in
selecting
133
men
were
as
follows:
they
were
to
originate
from
Eastern
Europe,
Africa,
Asia,
or
the
Middle
East
and
have
dark
hair.
The
participants
had
to
be
immigrants
and
refugees,
legal
or
otherwise.
The
role
of
the
artist
in
turn
was
to
manage,
direct,
and
process
these
persons.
The
yellow
headed
133
then
dispersed,
returning
to
their
everyday
activities:
predominantly
illegal
street
vending
on
and
around
Piazza
San
Marco.
In
the
preoccupation
with
law
and
exception
that
has
prevailed
in
much
critical
discourse
on
culture
over
the
last
decade
(see
Demoss
The
Migrant
Image),
the
reciprocal
necessity
of
both
optics
(Marxian
theories
of
the
wage,
and
of
subsumption)
has
fallen
out
of
the
picture.
Insofar
as
capital
totalizes
by
forms
of
separation
and
re-constitution
of
social
relations,
the
mutually
entwinement
of
law
and
wage
become
all
the
more
urgent
an
object
of
analysis.
It
might
be
argued
that
the
organization
of
surplus
labor
pools
readies
for
fresh
rounds
of
resource
extraction
and
primitive
accumulation
is
enabled
only
by
laws
of
passage,
of
the
regulation
of
boundaries
and
borders.
This
is
globalization.
Likewise,
the
state
of
exception,
about
which
we
have
heard
maybe
too
often,
is
a
structuring
principle
for
wage
relations
under
threat,
under
duress
of
right
to
live
or
let
die.
Besides
simply
and
tendentiously
dismissing
it
as
part
of
the
symptomatic
cruelty
of
the
art
world
as
transparent
analog
of
capital
in
general,
why
is
it
that
we
see
so
many
art
projects
addressing
the
crossroads
of
immigrant
labor
pools?"
Josep
Maria
Antentas
Anti-austerity
protest,
regime
crisis
and
political
strategy
in
the
Spanish
State
"The
emergence
of
M15
movement
in
Spain
in
15th
May
2011
marked
a
turning
point
in
Spanish
politics.
It
was
the
biggest
social
upsurge
since
the
establishment
of
the
current
Regime
in
1978
and
the
beginning
of
mass
resistance
to
austerity
policies
after
a
period
in
which
resistance
to
social
cuts
was
relatively
small
although
real.
The
movement
expressed
a
vague
antisystemic
consciousness
targeting
financial
powers
and
political
institutions.
Soon
after
its
emergence
M15
as
such
vanished,
but
mutated
into
a
wide
range
of
different
initiatives
and
movements.
Since
the
first
push
of
May
and
June
2011
anti-austerity
protests
have
had
a
less
visible
existence,
experienced
fragmentation
and
dispersion,
although
some
relevant
episodes
of
social
unrest
have
taken
place.
The
overall
dynamic
of
resistance
to
austerity
since
may
15th
has
been
very
defensive,
with
few
political
and
concrete
victories,
but
with
elements
of
counter-ofensive
and
capability
of
disruption.
The
upsurge
of
may
15th
represented
the
beginning
of
a
new
political
cycle
in
the
Spanish
state
and
changed
the
ideological,
cultural
and
political
landscape.
The
outcome
of
three
years
of
anti-austerity
protest
is
contradictory.
On
the
one
hand,
very
few
victories
were
achieved
and
social
situation
continued
to
deteriorate.
On
the
other
hand
the
has
been
an
important,
although
contradictory
and
limited,
politicisation
of
society.
The
economic
crisis
has
become
a
political
crisis
and
a
regime
crisis.
The
erosion
of
all
the
political
architecture
built
in
1978
has
deepen
and
the
main
pillars
of
the
State
are
in
question,
but
there
is
no
yet
an
alternative
counter-hegemonic
project
that
can
overcome.
The
experience
of
three-year
dynamics
of
anti-austerity
struggles
rises
some
important
strategic
questions.
The
most
important
one
refers
to
the
link
between
social
resistance
and
politics.
Spanish
social
movements
in
the
1990s
and
2000s
were
traditionally
influenced
by
the
strategic
perspectives
that
advocated
changing
the
world
without
taking
power
or
abstaining
from
politics.
The
deepening
of
the
economic
and
political
crisis
and
the
limits
of
social
resistance
to
achieve
victories
have
caused
a
return
of
politics,
a
shift
towards
the
search
of
political
alternatives
and
have
relaunched
the
strategic
debate
(in
the
sense
that
Daniel
Bensad
gave
to
these
two
ideas).
The
big
strategic
question
that
hovers
the
debate
among
activists
and
left
organisations
is
how
is
it
possible
to
win?,
that
is,
how
is
it
possible
to
articulate
a
social
majority
and
transform
it
into
a
political
one.
This
relaunch
of
strategic
debates
and
search
for
political
alternatives
and
solutions
is
quite
confusing
and
hurried
concerning
issues
as
electoral
tactics,
organizational
forms,
the
relationship
between
political
institutions
and
social
movements,
modes
of
leadership,
programme
and
demands,
and
other
matters
that
I'll
examine
in
this
paper.
There
are
two
underlying
questions
at
stake:
if
it
will
possible
or
not
to
forge
a
sociopolitical
alternative
with
a
relevant
political
audience
than
can
make
the
current
party
system
explode,
and
if
in
this
process
will
prevail
currents
that
carry
more
superficial
or
more
deep
projects
of
social
change."
Abelardo
Marina-Flores
&
Sergio
Camara
Profitability
and
Accumulation
Trends
in
Mexico,
1939-2013
"The
paper
analyses
the
structural
trends
of
profitability
and
capital
accumulation
in
Mexico
in
the
long
period.
The
analysis,
based
on
a
new
estimation
of
the
profit
rate
and
its
decomposition
in
Mexico,
is
divided
into
4
periods:
i)
The
consolidation
of
the
structural
transformations
during
the
Mexican
Revolution
and
the
Great
Depression
(second
half
of
the
1930s-1945).
This
period
is
characterized
by
a
steep
increase
in
profitability,
the
basis
of
the
expansive
long
wave
of
capital
accumulation
associated
to
the
Import
Substitution
Industrialization
(ISI)
model.
The
accumulation
process
in
this
period
was
mainly
driven
by
the
government.
ii)
The
consolidation
and
peak
of
the
expansive
long
wave
of
capitalist
accumulation
(1946-1968),
characterized
by
its
elevated
profitability
and
the
vigorous
process
of
capital
accumulation,
with
the
private
capitalist
investment
being
now
the
main
driver
of
the
process.
iii)
The
falling
rate
of
profit
implied
the
collapse
of
private
investment
and
the
structural
crisis
of
profitability
(1969-1982).
A
relatively
strong
accumulation
process
was
extended
by
the
anti-cyclical
policies
and
the
government
involvement
in
the
economy.
iv)
The
neoliberal
restructuring
process
(from
1983
onwards)
implied
a
complete
abandonment
of
the
government
intervention
in
the
process
of
capital
accumulation.
There
has
been
an
important
recovery
of
the
general
rate
of
profit
that
was
not
followed
by
a
similar
recovery
in
the
rate
of
productive
investment
given
the
neoliberal
bias
of
the
economy
towards
labor-intensive
industries
and
the
financialisation."
Helena
Marroig
Barreto
Marini
yesterday
and
today:
highlights
on
the
marxist
theory
of
dependency
and
new
perspectives
The
aim
of
the
this
study
is
to
introduce
the
basis
of
the
work
of
Ruy
Mauro
Marini,
a
brasilian
autor
from
the
60's,
through
his
central
categories
such
as
dependency,
subordinated
insertion,
and
superexploitation
of
the
work
force.
Also,
the
study
intends
to
show
some
concepts
presented
by
the
critically
renewed
marxist
theory
of
dependency,
especially
regarding
the
pattern
of
capital
accumulation,
already
introduced
by
Marini.
By
that,
this
work
hopes
to
be
able
to
provide
tools
to
operate
an
analysis
of
the
current
situation
in
Latin
America,
demystifying
the
conventional
diagnosis
on
the
matter,
and
revealing
that
the
underdevelopment
is
still
reproduced,
and
amplified,
in
the
continent.
Wiktor
Marzec
Marxism
as
a
subjectifying
device.
Remarks
form
the
empirical
inquiry
into
the
mobilizing
power
of
Marxism
"The
stubborn
survival
of
capitalism
redirected
the
focus
of
Marxist
scholars
into
the
past.
The
histories
of
borderland
Marxisms,
successful
labour
hegemonies
and
even
Bolshevik
politics
are
searched
for
new
insights
into
contemporary
struggles.
However,
this
scholarship
tirelessly
retains
a
bias
towards
theoretical
debates,
remaining
the
vernacular
Marxisms
of
workers
underresearched.
Drawing
from
extensive
empirical
research,
in
my
contribution
I
suggest
to
investigate
Marxism
as
a
subjectifying
device,
a
discursive
resource
mobilizing
and
modifying
its
addressees
and
their
relational
positions
in
the
political
regime.
The
Marxist
ideological
content
(speeches,
agitation,
proclamations)
and
practices
induced
a
certain
construction
of
the
self,
integrated
in
broader
discourses,
ideological
dispositives
and
institutions.
This
explanations,
this
article
addresses
a
number
of
factors
that
explain
these
features,
also
consistent
with
the
Law
of
the
falling
profit
rate:
i)
the
fragmentation
of
the
production
process
towards
certain
semi-peripheral
areas;
ii)
the
international
monetary
system
and
the
accumulation
of
reserves,
which
have
led
to
a
significant
flow
of
capital
from
periphery
to
the
more
developed
economies;
iii)
The
incorporation
of
the
old
planned
economies
to
the
global
law
of
value;
iv)
the
transformations
experienced
by
China;
v)
the
housing
bubble
and
the
profitability
of
capital.
Luk
Matoka
&
Ondej
Lnsk
The
Romani
people
are
now
described
as
a
forgotten
minority.
The
only
visible
attention
that
this
ethnic
group
is
receiving
across
Europe
is
explicitly
or
implicitly
racist.
In
our
contribution
we
will
focus
on
searching
for
the
roots
of
contemporary
racism
mainly
in
Central
Europe,
which
cannot
be
found
without
an
analysis
of
neoliberalism
and
the
crisis
of
capitalism.
Although
we
may
find
more
than
one
similarity
between
the
situation
of
the
Romani
people
and
the
Jewish
community
in
the
late
Weimar
Republic,
it
would
be
a
mistake
not
to
analyse
this
particular
situation
with
respect
to
the
social
and
historical
specificity
of
oppression
faced
by
the
Romani
community.
Ghettoization
practices
affecting
the
Romani
people
can
be
compared
to
(post-)
colonial
rule,
understood
in
terms
of
past
and
present
global
capitalist
expansion.
These
practices
are
no
longer
determined
geographically,
since
they
are
also
implemented
at
national
state
level
as
internal
colonialism.
This
is
why
we
call
these
Central
European
ghettos
islands
of
the
Third
World.
In
this
context,
we
will
focus
on
present-day
attempts
to
consider
the
Romani
minority
as
a
socially
excluded
group,
varying
from
traditional
classifications
(e.
g.
lumpenproletariat)
to
more
recent
ones
(e.
g.
precariat).
Wendy
Matsumura
"Japanese
Marxist
Uno
Kozo
argued
in
his
July
1950
essay,
""Methods
and
Objectives
of
a
Theory
of
Global
Political
Economy""
that
the
post-World
War
I
agricultural
crises
and
general
capitalist
crisis
of
the
late
1920s
were
outcomes
of
the
failures
by
individual
states
to
address
the
global
agrarian
question.
Using
extensive
empirical
data
from
Germany,
Great
Britain,
and
the
United
States
and
he
showed
that
even
states
dominated
by
monopoly
capital
turned
to
a
policy
of
self-sufficiency
in
foodstuffs
after
the
war.
This
global
condition,
which
required
extensive
state
intervention
in
agriculture,
expressed
to
Uno
the
increasingly
complex
and
global
nature
of
the
postwar
agrarian
question.
What
set
Uno
apart
from
his
peers
who
also
theorized
the
agrarian
question
during
the
first
half
of
the
20th
century
was
that
he
focused
on
the
global
condition,
but
just
as
importantly,
on
subjectivities.
He
problematized
Japan's
condition,
in
which
small
peasantry
submitted
to
Matveev
Neoliberalism
and
neopatrimonialism
are
distinct
(and
sometimes
competing)
theories
used
to
explain
the
nature
of
the
political
regime
in
Russia.
While
neoliberal
explanations
focus
on
reforms
which
violently
introduce
market
conditions
and
market
logic
in
all
spheres
of
life,
theories
of
neopatrimonialism
emphasize
the
authoritarian
and
clientelistic
character
of
politics,
the
privatization
of
the
state
by
various
groups,
and
endemic
corruption.
The
objective
of
my
research
is
to
use
these
two
theories
not
as
separate
interpretations
of
Russian
politics,
but
as
indicators
of
two
real
logics
operating
within
the
Russian
political
regime.
Neoliberal
and
neopatrimonial
processes
coexist
and
form
a
relationship
with
one
another.
I
will
present
some
preliminary
remarks
regarding
the
precise
nature
of
this
relationship,
based
on
the
analysis
of
the
discursive
struggle
between
the
neoliberal
and
the
'anti-neoliberal'
experts
and
think
tanks
with
connections
to
various
sections
of
the
Russian
political
establishment.
The
analysis
reveals
the
constant
presence
of
these
two
positions
in
the
public
sphere
and
their
frequent
collision.
Both
neoliberals
and
their
opponents,
despite
the
tension
between
them,
are
crucial
for
the
logic
of
the
Russian
political
regime.
Brendan
McGeever
that
actualised
the
struggle
against
antisemitism
during
the
Civil
War.
Whilst
traditional
interpretations
of
the
Russian
Revolution
have
assumed
that
the
campaigns
against
racism
and
antisemitism
were
conceived
and
carried
out
by
the
Party
leadership
(i.e.
Lenin
and
Trotsky
etc),
this
paper
will
show
that
in
the
case
of
antisemitism,
the
anti-racist
project
that
emerged
within
the
Soviet
state
was
in
fact
the
product
of
a
unique
racial
formation
composed
largely
of
non-Bolshevik
Jewish
Marxists
and
leftwing
Zionists.
The
paper
will
then
go
on
to
reflect
on
these
findings,
arguing
that
they
raise
critical
questions
for
how
we
conceptualise
and
understand
not
only
the
relationship
between
race
and
class,
but
also
the
legacy
of
Marxist
attempts
to
arrest
the
racialisation
of
social
relations
more
generally."
Scott
McLemee
From
"the
Russian
Question"
to
China
(and
Back
Again):
Debating
China
in
Trotskyist
Theory,
1950-58
"The
historiography
of
Trotskyism
too
often
tends
to
be
an
instance
of
Trotskyist
historiography:
a
matter
of
political
combat
continued
by
other
means.
And
nowhere
has
position-taking
and
line-consolidation
been
more
obvious
than
in
narrative
treatments
of
debates
on
the
Russian
question,
i.e.
the
problem
of
characterizing
the
political
economy
that
developed
under
the
Stalin
regime
and
of
assessing
the
precise
class
position
and
dynamics
of
the
party-state
apparatus.
Three
major
answers
were
formulated
within
the
movement
during
Trotskys
lifetime,
identifying
the
USSR
as
either
a
degenerated
workers
state,
state
capitalism,
or
bureaucratic
collectivism.
Many
(possibly
most)
subsequent
accounts
of
the
debate
have
been
written
on
the
behalf
of
one
position
or
the
other.
Creedal
affirmation
is
typically
accompanied
by
a
sort
of
cod
sociology-of-knowledge
explaining
the
source
and
ideological
function
of
the
other
positions.
The
advance
made
by
Marcel
Van
Der
Linden's
Western
Marxism
and
the
Soviet
Union:
A
Survey
of
Critical
Theories
and
Debates
Since
1917
(2007)
comes
only
in
part
through
its
non-polemical
perspective.
Besides
reconstructing
the
arguments
developed
within
the
Trotskyist
movement
alongside
the
theoretical
approaches
and
conclusions
of
figures
never
in
its
ranks
(such
as
Korsch,
Hilferding,
and
Bordiga),
Linden
also
offers
a
suggestive
periodization
of
various
Russian-question
analyses,
placing
their
emergence
and
development
in
the
context
of
major
phases
in
Soviet
history.
In
short,
Western
Marxism
and
the
Soviet
Union
presents
a
major
challenge
to
approaches
that
have
prevailed
in
the
secondary
literature
concerning
the
history
of
Left
Opposition-
derived
political
organizations.
It
breaks
up
the
established
and
self-enforced
patterning
of
differences.
New
constellations
begin
to
form.
And
the
charting
of
them
is
not
exhausted
by
the
typology
and
metatheoretical
remarks
that
the
book
offers
in
conclusion.
Neither
Linden
nor
anyone
else
has
taken
up
the
topic
I
will
pursue.
The
victory
of
the
Peoples
Liberation
Army
in
1949
and
the
system
that
then
emerged
under
the
rule
of
the
Chinese
Communist
Party
were
inevitably
taken
up
by
Trotskyists
in
terms
derived
from
the
various
positions
they
had
already
formulated
regarding
the
Russian
question.
But
for
some
tendencies
the
degree
of
fit
between
concept
and
phenomenon
was
unclear
or
problematic.
Complicating
things
still
more
was
the
rise
of
dirigiste
states
in
other
countries
then
winning
national
liberation.
Zhou
Enlais
role
at
the
Bandung
Conference
in
1955
underscored
the
need
to
understand
the
relationship
between
the
Chinese
system
and
the
emerging
postcolonial
regimes.
Finally,
there
was
the
need
to
assess
how
well
the
theory
of
permanent
revolution
accounted
for
any
of
these
developments
--
or
if
it
did
at
all.
A
number
of
articles
and
internal
documents
by
the
Philips-Miller
group
within
the
Socialist
Workers
Party
in
the
U.S.
expressed
the
clearest
recognition
that
China
and
the
Third
World
regimes
posed
a
set
of
problems
linked
with,
but
distinct
from,
the
Russian
question.
(Named
after
the
party
names
of
Art
Fox
and
Steve
Zeluck,
respectively,
the
Philips-Miller
current
held
a
state-capitalist
analysis.
Based
largely
in
Detroit,
it
was
formed
by
supporters
of
the
Johnson-Forest
Tendency
who
remained
within
the
SWP
after
C.L.R.
James
led
most
of
his
supporters
out
of
it
in
1951.)
Neither
the
Philips-Miller
material
nor
the
positions
regarding
China
formulated
by
other
tendencies
are
treated
in
Western
Marxism
and
the
Soviet
Union.
In
its
periodization
and
logic,
the
whole
discussion
moves
at
a
diagonal
to
Lindens
lines
of
argument.
But
it
offers
the
advantage
of
continuing
his
project
of
reframing
the
Russian
question
as
a
discursive
field
with
implications
not
limited
to
the
terms
or
the
stakes
of
internal
combat.
In
particular,
reconstructing
the
China
discussion
will
show
that
the
the
Russian-question
debate
itself
involves
a
number
of
relays
among
basic
concepts
(including
capitalism,
bureaucracy,
the
bourgeois
revolution,
and
the
stratification
and
composition
of
the
bourgeoisie
itself)
and
how
they
articulate
upon
one
another."
James
Meadway
Surplus
population,
secular
stagnation,
and
the
ghost
of
Malthus:
Rosa
Luxemburgs
Anti-
Kritik
reconsidered
"The
mainstream
of
economics,
from
Robert
Barro
to
Larry
Summers,
has
slowly
begun
to
identify
the
problem
of
secular
stagnation
and
decaying
growth
in
the
developed
world.
Meanwhile,
the
extraordinary
reception
given
to
Thomas
Pikettys
work
has
strongly
restated
the
notion
of
capitalism
as
a
system
driven
not
so
much
by
its
dynamic
potential
as
the
potential
for
enrichment
by
a
powerful
few.
He,
like
other
authors,
has
pointed
to
secular
trends
in
population
dynamics
as
perhaps
holding
the
key
to
slowing
growth
rates
into
the
future.
Rosa
Luxemburgs
vigorous
defence
of
her
great
work,
The
Accumulation
of
Capital,
dealt
directly
with
the
mainstream
of
her
day.
Attacking
the
emergent,
strongly
neoclassical
notion
that
economic
growth
could
be
read
off
population
growth
rates,
she
provided
a
Medien
Open-ended,
agential
and
growingly
(too?)
complex:
comments
on
Bob
Jessops
approaches
to
the
relationship
between
state
power
and
capital
This
paper
analyses
the
evolution
of
Bob
Jessops
understanding
of
the
relationship
between
state
power
and
capital.
We
identify
two
inter-related
tendencies
behind
the
authors
theoretical
developments,
which
are
i)
denying
the
a
priori
substantive
unity
of
various
aspects
of
social
formations
necessary
for
regularising
capital
accumulation,
and
ii)
proposing
an
agential
concept
which
can,
under
certain
conditions,
guarantee
this
unity
in
a
partial,
precarious
and
contradictory
way.
This
leads
to
a
growingly
complex
and
open-
ended
framework.
In
light
of
this,
and
by
identifying
the
debates
and
contexts
in
which
the
Merteuil
"It
is
argued
here
that
the
major
legal
framework
proposed
by
European
states
to
tackle
the
issue
of
prostitution
either
the
abolition
or
the
legalization
perspective
are
serving
a
neoliberal
agenda.
If
both
these
models
are
refused
by
most
of
the
sex
workers
organizations,
their
own
demands
and
analyses
are
still
unheard,
and
fought
against
by
large
parts
of
the
left
and
of
the
feminist
movement,
especially
these
last
months
in
Western
Europe.
From
a
marxist
perspective,
this
case
is
pretty
unique:
while
""the
left""
(or
most
radical
left
parties)
as
a
whole
do
not
have
homogenous
policies
towards
unions
and
social
movements,
they
still
cling
to
a
general
notion
of
""working
class""
politics.
The
left's
disorientation
towards
sex
workers
unionists
is
a
puzzling
fact:
how
does
one
account
for
it
in
a
materialist
perspective?
This
refusal
from
the
progressive
political
forces
to
support
sex
workers
has
to
be
understood
as
an
expression
of
the
more
general
difficulties
for
these
forces
to
think
about
reproductive
work.
If
""doing
sex""
is
to
be
considered
as
a
form
of
reproductive
work
(as
the
author
would
argue),
the
arguments
faced
by
sexworkers
today
boil
down
to
one
and
the
same
claim:
the
idea
that
campaigning
for
wages
in
compensation
for
domestic
labor
(or
reproductive
work)
amounts
to
a
trivialization
of
it.
This
is
pretty
close
to
what
the
feminist
movement
argued
against
the
Wages
for
Housework
campaign.
This
is
even
more
problematic
today
at
the
very
moment
when
neoliberalism
succeed
in
more
and
more
commodify
this
work
on
a
global
scale.
This
paper
then
aims
at
considering
the
struggles
around
reproductive
work
from
a
sex
workers
issues
perspective,
in
order
to
draw
the
potential
revolutionary
perspectives
to
which
the
""sex
work
is
work""
claim
invites
us
to.
While
escaping
the
dual
pitfalls
of
""soft""
prohibitionism
and
a
liberal
ideology
of
""choice"",
this
perspective
has
notably
the
merit
of
uniting
waged
and
unwaged
women
workers
against
both
gender
and
class
oppression
(
then
understood
as
different
""attributes""
of
the
same
""substance"")."
Atle
Mikkola
Kjosen
Anticipating
Realization:
Value's
Logic
of
Movement
and
Amazon's
Anticipatory
Shipping
"
The
online
retail
giant
Amazon
was
recently
awarded
a
patent
for
its
method
and
system
for
anticipatory
package
shipping.
In
essence,
this
patent
describes
how
the
retailer
wants
to
build
a
system
for
delivering
commodities
to
potential
buyers
before
they
place
an
order.
Based
on
previous
orders,
items
in
the
shipping
cart,
and
tracking
of
web-browsing,
the
package
is
sent
to
a
specified
geographic
area
and
while
the
package
is
in
transit
or
waiting
at
a
hub,
the
final
delivery
address
is
specified.
What
is
the
logic
behind
such
methods?
Why
must
exchange
be
anticipated?
This
paper
will
use
Amazons
anticipatory
shipping
as
an
example
with
which
to
explore
why
and
how
value
(and
by
extension
capital)
must
move
and
accelerate.
The
paper
will
focus
on
the
relationship
between
movement,
the
value-form
and
form-determination
to
account
for
why
value
must
move,
how
it
moves
and
by
what
means.
The
paper
argues
that
the
formal
reason
for
why
value
must
move
can
be
located
in
the
immanent
contradiction
of
the
commodity,
which
requires
value
to
appear
in
its
form.
Prior
to
exchange,
products
are
merely
products
of
labour,
use-values,
but
not
yet
consummated
as
values.
There
is
an
imperative
to
transport
commodities
as
fast
as
possible
to
the
market
for
value
to
be
realized;
anticipatory
shipping
is
thus
an
articulation
of
this
imperative."
Marcelo
Milan
A
Marxist
approach
to
economic
analysis
focuses
on
social
class
rather
than
on
individual
agents.
Class
incomes
depend
upon
a
functional
distribution
of
income,
with
wages
earned
by
workers
and
profits
earned
by
capitalists.
But
even
the
very
richest
in
the
US
economy
earn
a
substantial
portion
of
their
total
income
from
employment.
Wages
do
not
only
accrue
to
the
working
class.
Accounting
for
this
entails
deriving
time
series
(for
the
US
economy
1918-2011)
of
a
tri-partite
classification
of
working
class,
managers
who
depend
upon
their
labour
income,
and
managers
who
could
choose
not
to
be
employed
by
anyone;
or,
for
short,
workers,
managers
and
capitalists.
This
enables
a
quantitative
analysis
of
US
classes
and
their
dynamics
over
nearly
a
century,
which
can
substitute
for
the
more
usual
qualitative
analysis
coupled
with
quantitative
guesswork.
Lorenza
Monaco
India,
NCR:
Capital
Strategies
and
Labour
Resistance
in
a
Globalising
Auto
sector
The
intense
wave
of
Labour
unrest
which
has
substantially
shaken
the
Indian
Sub-continent,
and
the
recently
industrialised
National
Capital
Region
in
particular,
somewhat
leads
to
question
the
India
Shining
picture
and
poses
difficult
challenges
to
the
newly
elected
Modi
Government.
Undoubtedly,
the
Neoliberal
development
model
pursued
in
the
past
few
decades,
supported
by
a
progressively
globalising
elite,
reveals
a
profound
detachment
from
grassroots
movements
and
Working
Class
demands.
Examples
of
Labour
organisation
in
the
Automotive
sector,
and
the
unprecedented
strikes
which
have
occurred
at
the
Maruti-
Suzuki
Manesar
plant
in
between
2011
and
2012,
represent
a
very
interesting
case
to
look
at
Industrial
Conflict
and
Capital
Labour
relations
within
the
Indian
Democracy.
Issues
of
Political
Representativeness,
of
Workers
Autonomy
vs
traditional
forms
of
Union
organisation
,
of
sustainability
of
the
implemented
Labour
regime
are
raised,
together
with
an
analysis
of
Capital
onslaught
which,
with
the
active
support
of
the
State,
has
shifted
from
an
initial
attack
to
Workers
rights
to
an
open,
utter
violation
of
basic
Human
Rights.
Frederic
Monferrand
"In
this
paper,
I
would
like
to
subtantiate
the
following
hypothesis
:
the
various
trends
of
Marx's
Capital
interpretations
that
have
(re-)emerged
these
past
ten
years
under
the
name
of
value-form
theory
can
and
should
be
interpreted
as
part
of
an
attempt
to
develop
a
critical
social
ontology.
Despite
the
deep
differences
that
one
can
highlight
between
the
works
of
Backhaus
and
Rancire
(in
Reading
Capital)
Postone
and
Arthur,
or
Kurz
and
Heinrich,
all
these
researchers
share
an
emphasis
on
the
foundationnal
(rather
than
historical)
aspect
of
the
first
section
of
Marx's
Capital
and
a
critique
of
capitalism
in
terms
of
abstraction
rather
than
in
terms
of
alienation
or
exploitation.
Even
though
some
of
them
refuse
the
very
concept
of
ontology,
they
all
tend
to
present
their
work
as
an
attempt
to
grasp
the
deep
structures
(Postone;
1993)
or
the
ontological
ground
(Arthur;
2004)
of
capitalism.
As
opposed
to
most
contemporary
mainstream
social
ontology
(Searle;
1995),
or
even
to
Western
Marxist
attempts
to
reconstruct
Marx's
ontology
(Lukacs;
1978,
Gould;
1978),
they
are
not
engaged
in
a
description
of
the
transhistorical
features
of
society
but
rather
in
a
historically
specific
analysis
of
how
the
value-form
and
its
process
of
valorization
shape
the
basic
structures
of
social
life.
The
social
ontology
they
sketch
can
thus
be
said
to
be
historical
in
the
double
sense
that
they
apprehend
social
being
as
a
process
rather
than
as
a
substance
and
that
they
argue
that
it
is
only
with
the
capitalist
reification
of
social
structures
that
the
social
can
appear
as
an
object
of
ontological
inquiery.
I
will
try
to
elaborate
on
what
I
take
to
be
to
three
main
features
of
this
critical
social
ontology:
first,
drawing
on
Marx's
theory
of
fetishism,
I
will
show
that
the
value-form
should
be
understood
as
a
structure
of
daily-life
social
experience
in
capitalist
social
formations,
that
is,
as
what
transcendantally
circumscribes
what
is
doable
and
thinkable
under
capitalism.
Therefore,
elaborating
on
Marx's
theory
of
money,
I
will
then
argue
that
a
critical
social
ontology
should
be
a
relationnal
one,
according
to
which
the
conditions
of
possibility
of
social
objectivity
should
not
be
looked
for
in
mental
structures,
as
in
mainstream
social
ontology,
but
rather
in
social
structures.
Finally
I
will
turn
to
Marx's
concept
of
organic
system
in
the
Grundrisse
in
order
to
examine
how
a
critical
social
ontology
should
determine
the
interdependance
of
all
the
moments
(production,
consumption,
distribution)
that
constitute
capital
as
a
social
totality
if
it
is
to
account
for
the
differencieted
forms
of
Mookerjea
thesis
by
explaining
how
capitalism
did
not
emerge
in
other
countries,
rather
than
by
taking
one
step
further
and
exploring
the
plurality
of
other
'transitions'.
In
this
context
of
inquiry,
the
case
of
Spain
has
been
truly
neglected,
probably
the
only
exception
being
Julie
Marfany's
very
recent
work
on
the
Catalan
transition
(Marfany,
2012).
Building
and
moving
Brenner's
work,
Marfany
has
begun
to
carve
some
important
inroads
into
what
is
perhaps
a
much
more
complex
transition
to
capitalism.
She
points
out
at
some
stark
contrasts
with
the
English
experience,
like
the
much
larger
role
of
rural
industry
or
Catalonia's
unique
property
relations
(rabassa
morta),
that
sit
uneasily
with
Brenner's
model
of
the
transition.
In
contrast
to
England,
a
much
more
centralised
and
homogenous
country
at
the
time
of
its
transition,
the
Spanish
countryside
is
a
pluriverse
institutional
diversity,
where
parts
of
the
country
experienced
diverging
historical
trajectories
and
almost
every
region
operated
along
unique
property
relations.
This
paper
will
sketch
the
problematique
of
a
Spanish
transition
to
capitalism,
outlining
the
complexity
of
the
Spanish
case
and
presenting
the
challenges
it
poses.
For
example,
if
Brenner's
model
stresses
the
importance
of
depriving
peasants
of
their
means
of
material
reproduction,
forcing
them
off
the
land,
how
do
we
explain
that
Andalusian
agriculture
has
relied
on
a
huge
mass
of
landless
peasants
since
at
least
the
16th
century?
Does
the
institutional
plurality
of
the
Spanish
case
force
us
to
speak
of
the
transition
as
an
uneven
process,
where
capitalism
'arrived'
in
different
stages,
or
do
we
need
to
focus
on
what
may
have
been
multiple
transitions?
The
paper
will
present
the
Spanish
case,
raise
some
hypotheses
on
these
issues,
and
address
methodological
and
theoretical
questions
on
how
to
theorise
the
transition
to
capitalism
outside
of
England."
Kevin
Morgan
Chana Morgenstern
Committed
Literature
in
a
Partitioned
Land:
The
al-Jadid
Communist
Journal
and
the
Making
of
a
Palestinian
and
Arab-Jewish
Literary
Culture
in
1950s
Israel/Palestine
In
the
1950s
and
1960s,
a
group
of
young
Palestinian
and
Arab-Jewish
(Mizrahi)
Communist
writerswho
would
later
become
prominent
poets
and
authors
in
Israel
and
Palestine
began
their
careers
as
editors
and
writers
for
the
Arabic
arts
and
literature
magazine
al-
Jadid,
a
cultural
arm
of
the
Israeli
communist
party.
Palestinian
writers
such
as
Mahmoud
Darwish,
Emile
Habibi,
Hana
Ibrahim
and
Emile
Tuma
and
Arab-Jewish
(Mizrahi)
writers
such
as
Sami
Michael,
Shimon
Ballas
and
Sasson
Somekh
coalesced
around
the
journal
as
a
space
in
which
they
could
engage
in
the
formation
of
a
Communist
cultural
front
to
preserve
Arabic
culture
and
combat
the
developing
milieu
of
Zionism
and
partition
in
Israel/Palestine.
This
paper
will
trace
the
literary
history
of
this
community
of
writers
and
their
works,
paying
special
attention
to
the
cultural
program
that
the
journal
developed
and
the
way
in
which
this
program
catalyzed
literary
production
in
the
journal.
Through
an
analysis
of
articles
and
manifestos,
I
will
show
how
the
journal
advanced
an
aesthetic
program
that
advocated
for
the
development
of
a
committed,
internationalist
and
socialist
realist
Arabic
literature
that
reimagined
notions
of
Arab-Jewish
collectivity.
By
uncovering
and
examining
the
lost
literary
archive
of
al-Jadid,
I
demonstrate
the
way
in
which
the
joint
literature
that
the
journal
fostered
provides
us
with
critical
proof
of
an
anti-partition
resistance
culture
rooted
in
the
local
development
of
Arab
Marxist
and
decolonizing
practices.
This
literature
is
an
integral
but
under-researched
part
of
the
root
system
of
Arab-Jewish
(Mizrahi)
and
Palestinian
literatures
in
Israel/Palestine.
We
need
only
consider
the
impact
of
writers
such
as
Emile
Habibi,
Mahmoud
Darwish,
Shimon
Ballas
and
Sami
Michael
on
the
intellectual
history
and
literature
of
Palestine
and
Israel
to
understand
the
import
of
their
common
political
and
cultural
foundations.
The
literary
history
of
al-Jadid
challenges
the
canonical
separation
of
these
writers
into
two
hostile
literary
camps,
and
allows
us
to
see
their
common
roots
in
a
Marxist,
anti-partition
literature
that
greatly
impacted
subsequent
generations
of
Israeli
and
Palestinian
writers.
Fred
Moseley
Introduction
to
the
English
translation
of
Marxs
Manuscript
of
1863-65
Marxs
only
full
draft
of
Volume
3
of
Capital
was
written
in
the
Economic
Manuscript
of
1863-65.
Marxs
Book
III
manuscript
was
heavily
edited
by
Engels
for
the
first
German
edition
of
Volume
3
in
1894.
It
has
been
a
long-standing
question
in
Marxian
scholarship
concerning
how
much
did
Engels
change
Marxs
manuscript
and
are
there
significant
differences
between
the
two.
Marxs
original
manuscript
was
published
for
the
first
time
in
German
in
1992
in
the
Marx/Engels
Gesamtausgabe
(MEGA),
Section
II,
Volume
4.2,
and
this
important
manuscript
has
now
been
translated
into
English
(by
Ben
Fowkes)
and
will
be
published
by
Brill.
I
am
the
editor
of
the
translation
and
have
written
an
Introduction,
which
highlights
the
main
differences
between
Marxs
original
manuscript
and
Engels
edited
Volume
3,
in
my
view.
My
paper
will
be
this
Introduction.
Baris
Mucen
Mueller
How the Bourgeoisie survives: class and collective subjectivities in Sartres later work
"This
paper
examines
Jean-Paul
Sartres
theory
of
class,
focussing
particularly
on
the
theorisation
of
the
bourgeoisie
in
'LIdiot
de
la
famille'
(1971-2),
his
biography
of
Flaubert.
My
paper
will
argue
that
Sartres
concern
with
the
reproduction
of
the
bourgeoisie
in
his
later
texts
suggests
the
formation
of
a
conception
of
class
subjectivity
which
combines
elements
of
class
consciousness
and
ideology
and
which
further
often
resonates
with
Pierre
Bourdieus
theory
of
class,
despite
the
latters
well-known
criticism
of
'LIdiot'.
Whilst
'LIdiot'
upholds
the
fundamental
concepts
of
Sartres
earlier
notion
of
class,
such
as
the
absence
of
any
organic
class
unity,
my
paper
will
suggest
that
'LIdiot'
re-evaluates
the
social
realm,
marking
a
shift
towards
collective
subjectivities.
Sartres
analysis
of
the
school
Murray
Myers
Cars,
Crisis,
Conflict:
British
car
workers
in
the
1970s
and
the
unmaking
of
the
British
working
class
This
paper
focuses
on
the
experiences
of
British
car
workers
during
the
global
economic
crisis
in
the
1970s
using
a
social
historical
perspective.
At
its
heart
are
the
everyday
experiences
of
work,
political
agitation,
and
shop-floor
conflicts,
which
characterised
the
British
car
industry
in
the
1970s.
As
the
British
car
industry
attempted
to
confront
competition
from
overseas
and
decreasing
profits
at
home,
conflicts
over
jobs,
conditions,
and
wage-rates
affected
the
whole
industry,
and
provided
one
of
the
key
industrial
battlegrounds.
The
shift
from
a
militant,
confident,
and
well
organised
network
of
car
workers
across
Britain
in
the
late
1960s
to
a
weakened
and
neutered
one
in
the
mid
1980s
has
hereto
been
largely
an
undervalued
aspect
of
our
industrial
history,
yet
which
has
many
lessons
over
how
workers
confront
capitalisms
attempt
to
restore
profitability
to
the
system.
Through
analysing
the
specific
historical
experience
of
British
car
workers
during
the
1970s
crisis
we
can
better
understand
this
global
process.
The
paper
will
also
explore
the
role
of
revolutionary
politics
within
the
industry,
the
role
of
gender
inside
and
outside
the
car
factories,
and
attempt
to
draw
lessons
for
present
struggles.
Miryam
Nacimento.
Capital
accumulation
in
the
Alternative
Development
industry
and
the
reproduction
of
drug
policies
in
Peru
"The
current
international
drug
regime
has
established
a
variety
of
measures
aimed
at
suppressing
the
production,
distribution
and
consumption
of
cocaine.
Coca
leaves
are
the
raw
material
for
this
illicit
substance,
which
is
traditionally
grown
by
a
large
number
of
peasants
(cocaleros)
in
the
Andean
region.
In
order
to
limit
their
production
diverted
to
the
illegal
market,
Alternative
Development
policies
have
been
promoted
by
the
United
Nations
and
implemented
by
coca
growing
countries
like
Peru,
Bolivia
and
Ecuador
for
the
past
20
years.
These
interventions
have
sought
alternatives
for
the
cultivation
of
illegal
crops
by
promoting
broad
sustainable
rural
development
strategies
directed
to
coca-growing
peasants.
In
this
context,
and
following
the
shared
responsibility
principle,
big
amounts
of
foreign
aid
have
been
directed
to
fund
Alternative
Development
programs
in
Peru.
Donors
like
the
United
Nations,
the
United
States
and
the
European
Union
have
played
a
central
role
in
the
implementation
of
these
programs.
However,
over
the
years
evidence
confirms
that
despite
AD
interventions
have
caused
some
reductions
in
drug
crop
cultivation,
this
has
occurred
only
within
specific
areas
and
without
having
a
deeper
impact
in
global
drug
supply.
In
this
presentation
I
will
address
the
problem
of
the
inertial
reproduction
of
ineffective
drug
control
policies
like
Alternative
Development
by
analyzing
its
relationships
with
foreign
aid
dynamics
in
the
Andean
countries.
I
will
examine
the
Alternative
Development
policy
model
as
an
industry
where
different
fractions
of
capital
steaming
from
the
international
cooperation
institutions,
governmental
agencies,
civil
society
advocates
and
cocalero
organizations
meet
in
complex
(and
uneasy)
ways.
As
I
will
show,
these
different
fractions
struggle,
negotiate
and
organize
a
particular
form
of
capital
accumulation
that
ends
up
allowing
and
nurturing
the
drug
policy
inertia.
I
will
discuss
these
matters
by
focusing
my
analysis
on
the
implementation
of
an
Alternative
Development
program
located
in
Satipo,
a
longstanding
coca
growing
region
in
Peru.
First,
I
will
depict
the
everyday
practices
of
the
different
actors
involved
in
the
implementation
of
this
program.
In
doing
so,
I
will
also
explain
the
organic
relations
of
capital
formation
within
which
each
of
these
actors
are
embedded.
Secondly,
I
will
analyze
the
different
narratives
about
Alternative
Development
that
are
advanced
by
these
actors
and
how
they
are
informed
and
recreated
through
their
everyday
interaction.
Finally,
I
will
link
both
aspects
in
order
to
examine
how
these
interactions
are
framed
in
a
particular
form
of
capital
accumulation
that
ends
up
supporting
the
perpetuation
of
the
Alternative
Development
industry.
In
this
way,
my
analysis
will
seek
to
explain
the
reproduction
of
this
policy
model
by
disentangling
its
internal
organic
properties
as
well
as
the
common
senses
that
are
present
in
the
dynamic
governing
of
the
Alternative
Development
industry.
In
doing
so,
I
will
use
a
neo
Gramscian
theoretical
approach,
which
acknowledges
the
capitalist
conditions
of
existence
underlying
every
social
practice.
In
this
sense,
I
will
highlight
the
interactions
between
ideas
and
its
material
circumstances
as
well
as
the
way
in
which
these
interactions
help
to
reproduce
a
particular
type
of
drug
control
policies,
like
Alternative
Development
interventions."
Selim
Nadi
people
is
not
an
anti-capitalist
struggle
but
just
a
cultural
struggle
or
identity-politics.
The
main
accusation
against
the
P.I.R
was
the
accusation
of
communautarisme
(this
word
does
not
exist
in
the
english
vocabulary
but
can
be
translated
by
cultural-sectarianism),
but
the
P.I.R
is
not
a
cultural
organization,
it
is
a
political
one
which
is
focusing
it
struggle
against
racism
as
a
system
(which
was
theorized,
in
the
French
context,
by
Sadri
Khiari,
a
Tunisian
activist
and
a
former
member
of
the
4th
International)
and
is
taking
distance
with
the
dogmatic
and
colorblind
notion
of
class
in
the
French
context
certainly
not
doing
away
with
the
relevance
of
class
as
such,
as
the
Party's
political
project
is
a
coalition
and
hegemonic
bloc
with
white
popular
classes.
Analyzing
the
history
of
the
P.I.R
is
very
important
to
show
how
this
organization
put
the
race
question
in
the
French
marxist
political
field.
Jonathan
Neale
From
Copenhagen
to
Paris
-
the
climate
justice
movement
and
the
contradictions
of
ruling
class
climate
strategies
"How
does
the
climate
justice
movement
respond
to
the
Paris
COP?
We
start
with
the
ruling
class.
To
halt
runaway
climate
change
will
require
leaving
the
carbon
in
the
ground,
extensive
government
regulation,
and
massive
public
works
programmes.
(Climate
jobs
campaigns
are
an
attempt
to
do
this
sooner
rather
than
later.)
The
ruling
class
know
this.
They
also
understand
the
science.
And
they
own
the
world
they
don't
want
to
wreck
it.
But
they
are
paralysed
because
massive
public
works
and
regulation
would
mean
the
end
of
the
neoliberal
project.
And
since
2008
the
pressures
of
increased
international
competition
rule
out
the
extra
expense
for
any
competing
national
capital.
In
addition,
those
based
on
high
carbon
corporations
want
no
action
on
all.
The
ruling
class
are
divided,
confused,
and
face
pressure
from
organised
scientists,
NGOs
and
a
wider
public.
So
greenwash
is
piled
upon
contradiction.
And
the
outcome
of
Paris
will
be
terrible.
The
danger
is
repeating
the
demoralisation
after
Copenhagen.
So
the
climate
movement
needs
a
response
big
enough
to
say
this
is
only
the
beginning
of
the
fight.
The
talk
will
report
on
the
state
of
play
on
this
by
November."
John
Nescher
Barbara
Neukirchinger
How
do
we
bring
nonhuman
entities
into
the
social,
or
how
do
we
forge
collectives
of
humans
and
nonhumans
[Latour,
2000]?
This
is,
in
my
view,
one
of
the
key
political
questions
for
the
Anthropocene
and
beyond.
More
than
giving
voice
to
nonhumans,
through
my
doctoral
research
I
explore
aesthetic
modes
of
making
tangible
labour
of
nonhumans
that
is
invisible
in
humans
economy
and
inventing
possible
ways
of
working
together
with
them.
The
aim
of
this
endeavour
is
not
an
economic
product,
not
even
a
social
relation
(immaterial
labour),
instead
it
is
conjunction,
[to]
enter
into
relation
with
entities
not
composed
of
our
matter,
not
speaking
our
language,
and
not
reducible
to
the
communication
of
discreet,
verbal,
or
digital
signs.
[Berardi,
2012]
As
such,
this
practice
tries
to
deterritorialize
away
from
semio-capitalism
into
the
realm
of
political
ecology,
to
imagine
a
politics
of
vital
materialism
[Bennett,
2010].
In
my
recent
art/research
project
All
That
Is
Air
Melts
Into
City
I
have
tackled
the
idea
of
political/economic
representation
of
carbon-dioxide
(CO2),
the
crucial
greenhouse
gas
yet
intangible
to
our
senses.
The
project
is
a
materialisation
of
the
circulation
of
carbon-dioxide
through
human
and
non-human
ecologies.
Carbon-dioxide
takes
a
panoply
of
shapes
as
it
moves
between
air,
animal
bodies,
plants,
rocks,
combustion
engines,
and
further.
Recently
it
has
become
an
economic
figure
too,
the
main
protagonist
of
the
European
Union
Emission
Trading
Scheme
(EU
ETS),
electronic
financial
market
for
trading
in
allowances
to
release
tonnes
of
CO2
into
the
atmosphere
-
European
Emission
Allowances,
or
simply
carbon
stocks.
This
markets
logic
is
complex
and
its
movements
are
hard
to
discern
almost
as
it
is
difficult
to
see
the
molecules
of
CO2
in
the
sky.
Yet,
this
market
is
materially
sited
in
the
City
of
London,
and
the
greenhouse
effect
is
real.
Through
a
performative
walk
across
London,
I
have
enacted
a
series
of
potential
financial
exchanges
of
carbon
stocks
at
a
human
pace.
At
the
same
time,
I
have
tracked
the
photosynthetic
activity
of
the
vegetation
in
the
city,
the
effective
volumes
of
CO2
in
the
air,
and
paralleled
this
with
live
streamed
financial
data
about
the
trading
of
the
carbon
stock.
These
different
types
of
information
have
been
streamed
near-live
on
an
online
platform
thus
bringing
together
a
multitude
of
actors
that
are
not
(yet)
economically
and
politically
related.
The
electronic
stock
market,
the
photosynthetic
labour
of
trees
and
movements
of
the
air
are
assembled
and
represented
together,
thus
revealing
the
present
disjunctions
but
also
possible
conjunctions.
This
is
but
one
of
the
tentative
steps
in
reimagining
our
political
economy
in
the
time
of
climate
change,
and
I
would
like
to
share
it
with
the
public
of
the
Historical
Materialism
conference
and
discuss
possible
ways
of
moving
this
artistic/theoretical
research
further.
More
information
about
the
project
at>
http://allthatisairmeltsintocity.cc/
August Nimtz
"Three
years
after
the
Bolshevik-led
triumph
in
October
1917,
Lenin
wrote
that
his
partys
participation
in
the
four
Russian
State
Dumas
between
1906
and
1915
was
indispensable
in
that
success.
A
detailed
reading
of
that
experience
supports
Lenins
claim
as
well
as
making
it
possible
to
connect
for
the
first
time
the
dots
between
Marx
and
Engelss
electoral/parliamentary
strategy
and
what
the
Bolsheviks
carried
out
in
the
October
Revolution.
This
is
a
distillation
of
the
evidence
presented
in
my
recently
published
two-
volume
book,*Lenins
Electoral
Strategy:
The
Ballot,
the
Streetsor
Both.
*"
Tony
Norfield
The
financial
system
both
reflects
capitalist
economic
power
and
is
a
means
of
reinforcing
it.
This
is
shown
not
simply
in
the
subordination
of
debtors
(countries,
companies
or
individuals)
in
a
'credit
crunch',
but,
more
importantly,
in
the
regular,
day-to-day
operations
of
the
financial
system.
Such
power
is
wielded
not
only
by
banks
and
other
financial
institutions,
but
also
by
the
state
and
all
kinds
of
capitalist
company.
Modern
capitalism
takes
a
financial
form,
one
that
marshals
society's
resources
for
the
benefit
of
the
few.
This
paper
details
the
main
forms
in
which
this
happens
today,
analysing
the
international
flow
of
funds,
the
foreign
exchange,
bond
and
equity
markets
and
explaining
the
central
role
of
what
Marx
called
'fictitious
capital'
(financial
securities).
It
will
examine
how
the
major
imperialist
countries
dominate
global
financial
markets
and
are
able
to
use
these
to
appropriate
surplus
value
from
the
rest
of
the
world
economy.
Diana
O'Dwyer
&
Eileen
Connolly
This
has
helped
capitalism
to
survive
by
further
constraining
the
already
severely
limited
autonomy
of
civil
society
from
capitalist
interests,
tightening
the
integration
of
civil
and
political
society,
and
reinforcing
civil
societys
hegemonic
role
of
continually
(re-)legitimising
the
capitalist
state
and
the
class
relations
it
maintains.
Politically,
it
offers
the
increased
flexibility
and
political
deniability
of
subcontracted
governance,
at
a
time
when
public
trust
in
NGOs
also
far
exceeds
that
in
governments,
political
parties
or
corporations.
Economically,
it
reinforces
a
non-profit
tier
within
the
economic
base,
characterised
by
low
wages
and
conditions.
This
reduces
costs
for
the
state
and
the
social
demands
on
capital,
while
enabling
these
relations
of
production
to
be
justified
ideologically
vis--vis
NGOs
non-
profit
or
charitable
purpose.
Drawing
on
original
research
into
the
international
NGO
campaigns
to
ban
landmines
and
cluster
munitions,
the
paper
shows
how
this
closer
integration
of
civil
and
political
society
has
worked
to
legitimise
a
Western-dominated
international
capitalist
order
and
the
Western-dominated
world
military
order
that
sustains
it.
Western-based
NGOs
working
in
partnership
with
Western
governments
are
key
actors
in
this,
both
domestically
and
in
the
South,
where
together
with
local
partner
NGOs,
they
insinuate
Western-based
transnational
capitalist
interests
within
peripheral
and
semi-peripheral
states.
This
reinforces
historical
processes
of
uneven
and
combined
development
and
helps
create
international
ideological
support
for
an
international
capitalist
order
that
remains
Western-
dominated.
Such
transnational
NGOisation
represents
a
largely
neglected
dimension
of
both
the
internationalisation
of
the
state
and
comprador
capitalism."
Blair
Ogden
words
what
conditions
the
possibility
of
this
phenomenon?
My
paper
is
based
around
three
interlocking
claims.
Hypothesis
(I):
Benjamin
believed
that
divine
violence
is
possible
because
of
the
fact
that
human
beings
possess
the
power
to
execute
a
particular
type
of
judgement.
Hypothesis
(II):
Benjamin
believed
that
aesthetic
judgements
about
beauty
and
political
judgements
about
divine
violence
are
(roughly)
analogous.
Hypothesis
(III):
Benjamin
believed
that
the
agent
of
divine
violence
is
(roughly)
analogous
to
the
figure
of
the
artistic
genius
in
the
Critique
of
Judgement.
According
to
my
interpretation
of
the
Critique
of
Violence
there
is
a
strong
family
resemblance
between
judgements
about
beauty
and
divine
violence
insofar
as
both
judgements
make
use
of
the
activities
of
the
imagination.
This
conclusion
provokes
further
interest
in
the
relationship
between
politics
and
aesthetics.
Hyung-suk
OH & Seung-wook
BAEK
Transformation
of
Korean
capitalism
in
the
1990s:
focused
on
the
Hanbo
bankruptcy
case
Polemics
on
the
causes
of
the
1997
Korean
crisis
diverged
between
neoliberalism
and
developmental-statism.
As
for
the
former,
strong
influences
of
neoliberalism
and
weak
state
were
main
causes
for
the
crisis
whereas
as
for
the
latter
the
strong
state
of
crony
capitalism
was
a
main
cause
for
the
crisis.
Despite
many
differences,
however,
both
claims
share
a
common
issue:
strong
or
weak
state.
On
the
contrary
dynamics
of
capital
is
least
addressed.
This
paper
will
focus
on
the
accumulation
strategy
of
capital,
especially
emphasizing
difficulties
of
Korean
Chaebol
for
profit-making
way-out
in
the
1990s.
I
select
Hanbo
bankruptcy
case
for
my
study.
Hanbo
was
bankrupted
in
January
1997,
and
many
critics
condemned
for
its
irrational
expansion.
I
want
to
challenge
against
that
condemnation
since
over-investments
in
1990s
could
be
regarded
both
as
inevitable
and
partly
rational
for
Korean
capital
considering
internal
and
external
circumstances.
With
Hanbo
case,
I
will
show
that
the
1997
Korean
crisis
revealed
structural
limits
of
dynamics
of
late
20th
Korean
capitalism,
rather
than
the
irrationality
of
crony
capitalism
or
deregulation.
This
study
will
help
to
understand
unique
nature
of
neoliberalism
in
Korea.
Vesa
Oittinen
function.
Its
aim
is
to
reveal
the
upside
down
turned
world
of
capitalist
production
relations,
a
world
which
is
created
by
the
fetishisms
of
commodity
economy.
In
this
respect,
Marxs
idea
of
dialectics
parallels
to
Kants,
who
spoke
of
the
dialectics
as
a
critique
of
illusions
(Kritik
des
Scheins):
the
critical
philosophy
reveals
the
origin
of
illusions
of
transcendental
judgements
(KrV
B
234
sqq.).
In
an
analogous
manner,
the
theory
of
commodity
fetishism
serves
for
Marx
to
unveil
the
illusion(s)
of
bourgeois
political
economy,
which
accepts
the
surface
appearances
of
economic
life
without
questioning
them.
So
there
is
in
this
respect
a
clear
resemblance
between
the
dialectics
in
Kant
and
in
Marx.
Chris
OKane
The
Symbol
of
Power,
The
Form
of
Thought:
Money,
Measure
and
Abstraction
in
Foucault
and
Sohn-Rethel
This
contribution
to
the
critical
theory
stream
looks
to
draw
on
Michel
Foucaults
comments
on
money
in
the
recently
translated
Lectures
on
the
Will
to
Know
in
order
to
compare
Foucaults
and
Alfred
Sohn-Rethels
accounts
of
how
measure
and
abstraction
developed
in
tandem
with
the
emergence
of
the
Ancient
Greek
Market.
In
particular,
it
will
compare
how
their
respective
interpretations
differ
in
regard
to
Foucaults
conception
of
the
symbolic
power
of
money
and
Sohn-Rethels
conception
of
real
and
conceptual
abstraction.
Although
it
is
usually
argued
that
Foucault
possessed
a
neo-Ricardian
interpretation
of
Marx,
and
that
Sohn-Rethel
provided
a
seminal
value-theoretical
interpretation
of
Marxs
critique
of
political
economy,
I
will
also
endeavour
to
show
how
Foucaults
account
of
the
historical-specificity
of
the
Ancient
Greek
market
can
be
used
to
improve
Sohn-Rethels
trans-historicism
and
move
towards
bringing
their
accounts
of
power
and
thought
into
alignment
with
each
other.
Benjamin
Opratko
"In
1986,
the
late
Stuart
Hall
published
his
seminal
Gramscis
relevance
for
the
study
of
race
and
ethnicity.
Preoccupied
with
intervening
in
a
specific
conjuncture
of
(the
crisis
of)
Marxism,
it
formulated
a
powerful
critique
of
orthodox
Marxism
in
rather
general
terms,
yet
remained
rather
vague
in
terms
of
concrete
inquiries
in
the
nature
of
racism(s).
Almost
thirty
years
later,
the
question
of
Gramscis
relevance
remains
with
us:
How
could
a
Gramscian
theoretical
framework
that
is,
a
framework
of
Marxist
analysis
that
places
the
question
of
hegemony
at
its
centre
contribute
to
a
deeper
understanding
of
the
ways
in
which
contemporary
racism(s)
work?
This
paper
discusses
the
possibilities
opened
up
by
Gramsci,
Hall
and
others,
of
analysing
racism
as
an
integral
aspect
of
capitalist
hegemony.
In
a
first
part,
elements
of
a
Hegemony-
theory
of
racism
are
traced
in
Gramscis
own
work,
including
his
considerations
on
the
Southern
Question
and
his
reflections
on
Anti-Semitism.
Secondly,
Stuart
Halls
specific
argument
for
Gramscis
relevance
for
the
study
of
race
and
racism
is
discussed
and
re-
considered,
reconnecting
his
essay
with
earlier
considerations
on
race,
and
especially
with
the
collectively
authored
analysis
of
racialization
in
Policing
the
crisis.
Building
upon
these
arguments,
I
sketch
contours
of
a
theoretical
framework
integrating
the
analysis
of
racism
into
a
Gramscian
problematique
of
hegemony
allowing
investigating
the
concrete
ways
in
which
racism
can
be
considered
part
of
a
historical
bloc.
Finally,
this
theoretical
framework
is
illustrated
by
preliminary
findings
from
ongoing
original
research
on
contemporary
forms
of
anti-Muslim
racism
in
Austria.
Data
collected
in
interviews
conducted
with
journalists
and
media
personnel
is
analysed
as
a
complex
ensemble
of
organic
intellectuals
investments
in
in
a
broad,
hegemonic
anti-Muslim
discourse,
offering
means
of
stabilizing
the
current
historical
bloc
organized
around
implicit
and
explicit
logics
of
class,
gender,
sexuality
and
crisis."
Maia
Pal
Clment
Paradis
You
dont
expect
readers
to
believe
that
theres
actually
a
link
between
Proust
and
the
Marxist
theory,
do
you?
might
ask
the
careful
reader.
Without
any
provocation,
my
answer
will
be
clear:
lets
read
In
Search
of
Lost
Time
again
it
hasnt
revealed
all
its
secrets.
One
of
them
lies
in
the
hotels
depicted
by
the
narrator:
some
of
them
are
of
course
luxury
hotels,
where
aristocrats
and
bourgeois
observe
themselves
and
fantasize
about
the
working
class
serving
them.
But
Proust
also
describes
another
kind
of
hotel:
the
brothel
where
the
same
population
meets,
served
once
again
by
honest
people
exploited
to
the
very
core
of
their
psyche
and
sexuality
or,
as
Lukcs
explains,
reified,
because
everything
and
everybody
is
to
be
consumed
in
these
hotels
by
the
clients,
the
staff
included.
The
logic
of
the
hotels,
every
one
of
them,
is
the
logic
of
prostitution.
As
Jupien,
the
director
of
a
hotel
hiding
a
homosexual
brothel,
explains:
Here,
contrary
to
the
doctrine
of
the
Carmelites,
it
is
thanks
to
vice
that
virtue
is
able
to
live.
Mandeville
and
his
Fable
of
the
Bees
arent
far.
Proust
thus
reveals
the
logic
of
the
economy
of
his
world
a
liberal
logic
based
on
the
disposability
of
human
beings.
The
author
is
here
at
the
core
of
modernity:
as
French
philosopher
Michel
Clouscard
explains,
the
prostitute
is
the
key-commodity;
it
is
the
origin
of
the
reciprocal
engendering
of
market
and
desire.
Unexpectedly,
Proust
describes,
at
the
end
of
his
novel,
a
complex
economical
system,
that
the
Marxist
theory
can
help
us
decipher
and
that
shows
how
capitalism
survives
through
the
reciprocal
promotion
of
the
power
of
money,
sex,
youth
and
beauty,
in
a
real
market
of
desire.
Michael
Patrick McCabe
A
Left
Without
a
State:
Confronting
the
Climate
Crisis
in
the
Context
of
Neoliberal
State
Restructuring
and
Left
Anti-Statism
This
paper
problematizes
neoliberal
state
restructuring
through
the
lens
of
climate
change
in
order
to
challenge
the
politics
of
anti-statism
and
decentralization
that
have
become
dominant
on
the
Left;
most
recently
exemplified
by
the
Occupy
movement,
but
found
in
the
climate
justice
movement.
The
nation-state
is
the
only
institution
with
the
coercive
ability
and
financial
resources
to
confront
and
transcend
the
carbon-economy,
while
adapting
to
the
negative
externalities
produced
by
it.
However,
neoliberal
state
restructuring
has
redirected
the
regulatory
and
interventionist
mechanisms
of
the
nation-state
toward
the
singular
function
of
facilitating
market
processes
of
accumulation.
An
additional
consequence
of
neoliberal
state
restructuring
has
been
a
model
of
austerity
that,
in
the
United
States
and
the
European
Union,
has
resulted
in
a
steady
decline
in
national
funding
for
climate
initiatives.
As
a
result,
the
burden
of
developing
and
implementing
solutions
to
climate
change
is
devolved
to
subordinate
scales
of
government
that
lack
the
structural
and
budgetary
capacity
to
effectively
operationalize
climate
change
adaptation
and
mitigation
strategies.
Therefore,
if
the
Left
is
to
effectively
address
climate
change,
it
must
develop
a
political
program
that
focuses
on
confronting,
and
ultimately
controlling
the
state
as
a
means
by
which
to
redirect
its
functions
away
from
neoliberal
objectives
and
toward
emancipatory
goals
that,
in
the
context
of
climate
change,
range
from
structural
transformations
in
the
energy-economy
to
global
climate
change
adaptation
and
mitigation
initiatives.
Jos
Paulo Guedes
Pinto
"It
is
known
that
lots
of
companies
are
using
mass
collaboration
or
crowdsourcing
as
an
alternative
and/or
a
complement
to
outsource
their
production.
The
diference
is
that
crowdsourcing
relies
on
""free""
individual
agents
that
come
together
and
cooperate
to
improve
a
given
operation
or
solve
a
problem.
This
can
be
incentivized
by
a
reward
system,
though
it
is
not
required.
In
this
paper
we
will
put
in
a
critical
perspective
the
act
of
crowdsource
inovations
by
major
companies.
We
will
present
some
case
studies
and
discuss
if
the
concept
of
superexploitation,
for
example,
is
adequate
to
comprehend
these
new
form
of
labor
that
emerges
in
post-large-scale
industry
enterprises.
One
argument
is
that
the
previous
concept
fails
to
grasp
a
new
form
of
labor
subjection
to
capital.
Albeit
this
kind
of
labor
is
still
under
a
real
subjection
to
capital,
we
can
tell
that
it
is
not
anymore
material
(as
in
large-scale
industries)
but
intellectual.
The
main
question
here
is
why
there
are
a
lot
of
workers
that
supply
these
enterprises
with
their
expertise
almost
for
free?
Class
struggle
still
exists,
of
course,
but
it
takes
new
concepts
to
understand
these
""new""
forms
of
exploitation."
William
A.
Pelz.
-the
difficulty
of
maintaining
a
diverse
organization
that
combined
rival
political
ideologies,
-problem
of
being
an
open
organization
in
a
time
of
repression.
Finally,
a
look
must
be
cast
beyond
the
actual
real
problems
of
the
IWMA
to
the
importance
of
the
International
in
winning
some
workers
to
the
idea
of
internationalism
and
labor
activism.
Sanja
Petkovska
Martinelli
Gender
and
sexuality:
particularities
of
the
labor
force
and
the
accumulation
in
telemarketing.
The
following
paper
to
be
presented
on
the
Eleventh
annual
Historical
Materialism
Conference
is
a
result
of
reflections
that
are
realized
in
my
masters
research,
at
the
department
of
sociology
of
Unicamp,
in
Brazil.
In
this
research
I
study
the
teleworkers
of
Campinas
So
Paulo
and
their
political
experiences,
in
order
to
understand
the
composition
of
the
contemporary
working
class,
as
well
the
main
tendencies
and
aspects
of
the
actual
capitalism.
The
teleworkers
compose
a
historical
recently
category,
they
are
a
result
of
the
changes
in
the
capital
accumulation
pattern
occurred
circa
1980s,
when
the
technological
increment
on
the
work,
the
increase
of
the
service
sector
and
the
globalization
of
capital
occurred.
In
Brazil,
is
from
1990s
when
the
international
division
of
labor,
and
the
neoliberalism
and
the
waves
of
privatization
settled
in
the
country
that
the
telemarketing
appears
as
a
capital
accumulation
sector.
The
teleworkers
are
mostly
young
women,
which
also
has
a
significant
number
of
homosexuals
and
transsexuals.
The
goal
of
this
paper
is
to
develop
a
brief
analysis
and
debate
about
the
following
questions:
whats
the
reason
of
a
large
number
of
women
working
in
telemarketing?
How
the
female
working
force
is
explored
in
this
sector
in
order
to
encourage
their
accumulation
of
capital?
What
is
the
reason
to
find
in
telemarketing
a
large
number
of
homosexuals
and
transgender
from
less
wealthy
classes?
How
these
new
features
reconfigure
aspects
of
the
working
class
in
the
struggle
between
capital
and
labor,
and
their
political
experiences?
Among
other
issues
that
also
will
appear
in
the
discussion
that
the
paper
is
going
to
present
about
the
current
functioning
of
capitalism
and
the
working
class.
Herbert
Pimlott
1979
or
Thatcherism
Revisited:
Rethinking
the
Crisis
of
the
Conjuncture
through
Cultural
Materialism
On
the
35th
anniversary
of
the
publication
of
the
late
Stuart
Hall's
Thatcherism
thesis
in
Marxism
Today,
and
of
Margaret
Thatchers
first
of
three
general
election
victories,
this
paper
offers
a
rethinking
of
the
period
of
crisis
of
the
late
1970s
and
early
1980s
by
drawing
upon
Raymond
Williamss
cultural
materialism
(I
use
1979
as
the
cypher
for
this
period
of
reaction,
versus
1968
as
the
cypher
for
the
radical
1960s).
The
paper
argues
that
part
of
the
weakness
of
Halls
Thatcherism
thesis
was
its
location
within
a
particular
aesthetic-intellectual
formation,
which
alongside
Eric
Hobsbawms
Forward
March
of
Labour
Halted?
thesis,
overlooked
working-class,
counter-hegemonic
formations.
A
key
part
of
understanding
1979,
involves
analysing
the
process
of
re-formation
of
the
working
class
through
an
analysis
of
the
structure
of
feeling,
as
expressed
via
forms
of
working-class
practical
consciousness
in
an
(pre)emergent
culture.
The
subsequent
failure
of
radical
counter-hegemony
cannot
just
be
ascribed
to
Thatcherism's
'authoritarian
populism'
per
se,
but
needs
to
take
into
account
other
aspects
of
the
processes
of
ideological
domination
via
mass
media,
government
and
political
parties,
which
can
be
understood
in
part
via
Williamss
constitutional
authoritarianism,
and
in
part
through
identifying
the
failure
of
a
radical
working
class
emergent
culture
to
become
fully
emergent.
Simon
Pirani
"Global
fossil
fuel
consumption
in
2000-2009
was
running
at
more
than
four
times
the
level
of
1950-1959.
Since
fossil
fuel
consumption,
and
production,
are
key
causes
of
global
warming,
it
is
generally
accepted
that
reduction
of
both
would
be
a
good
thing.
And
yet
policies
aimed
at
reducing
consumption,
at
both
national
and
international
level,
have
failed
a
striking
fact
of
modern
history.
Since
the
1980s,
these
policies
have
neither
reversed,
nor
even
slowed
down,
the
aggregate
fossil
fuel
consumption
growth
rate.
Research
on
what
drives
the
increase
from
the
consumption
side,
and
the
context
of
and
reasons
for
these
policy
failures,
is
obviously
relevant
to
discussion
on
climate
change.
Reducing
greenhouse
gas
emissions
in
the
first
place
means
reducing
fossil
fuel
consumption.
The
way
that
emissions,
and
consumption,
are
counted
is
highly
political.
Much
academic
work
in
disciplines
such
as
industrial
ecology
and
structural
ecology
uses
models
based
on
the
IPAT
equation
(impact
=
population
x
affluence
x
technology)
and
variants
thereof.
The
paper
will
argue
that
such
approaches
often
downplay
or
ignore
the
role
of
economic
and
power
relations
that
shape
industries,
infrastructures
and
technologies
that
account
for
most
emissions.
Vast
differences
not
only
in
consumption
levels
by
different
people,
but
also
between
different
types
of
consumption
(for
manufacture
by
the
company
that
employs
you?
for
personal
use?)
receive
little
attention.
Neo-colonial
economic
relations
between
the
developed
countries
and
others
are
also
often
downplayed,
although
consumption-based
accounting
of
emissions
(i.e.
attributing
emissions
to
the
country
where
stuff
is
consumed,
instead
of
where
it
is
made)
has
begun
to
counter
that.
The
paper
will
review
methods
of
counting
emissions,
and
fossil
fuel
consumption;
consider
some
of
the
notable
trends
in
consumption
over
the
past
fifty
years;
and
propose
research
methods
that
could
help
to
analyse
consumption
in
the
context
of
capitalist
social
relations.
It
is
part
of
a
project
on
the
global
history
of
fossil
fuel
consumption
on
which
the
author
has
begun
work
in
early
2014.
Ana
Podvri
Putting
Compradors
on
the
Test:
Toward
a
Critical
Analytical
Framework
for
Considering
the
Peripherisation
of
Central-Eastern
Europe
As
Slovenia,
for
a
long
time
considered
as
success
story
of
post-socialist
transition,
got
hit
by
the
current
social-economic
crisis,
and
government
proposed
a
new
privatization
program
the
local
left
has
reframed
their
debate
around
the
so-called
comprador
bourgeoisie,
adopting
the
dependency
theory
and
World
System
analysis
discourse.
Actually,
since
mid
2000
an
important
part
of
left
discourse
on
development
of
Eastern
and
Central
Europe
has
adopted
those
theoretical
paradigms
to
address
the
issue
of
economic
and
political
dependency
on
foreign
capital.
However,
regarding
recent
political
and
economic
transformations
on
the
global
scale
we
might
ask
if
those
paradigms
are
still
pertinent
to
consider
contemporary
processes
of
peripherisation
within
EU?
Premised
on
the
commercial
understanding
of
capitalism
could
they
propose
an
analysis
of
those
processes
from
the
standpoint
and
for
the
working
class?
Drawn
mainly
upon
recent
insights
from
Marxist
theory
of
development
and
Marxist
theory
of
the
capitalist
state
a
critical
engagement
with
above-mentioned
approaches
is
politically
necessary
and
theoretical
productive
only
an
analytical
framework
that
grasp
the
social
mechanisms
and
the
underlying
social
logics
of
the
processes
of
peripherisation
within
Europe
could
enable
us
to
articulate
political
strategy
in
favor
of
the
international
solidarity.
Julia
Podziewska
Pozzoni
Between
Philosophy
and
Social
Science:
Althusser
and
the
Della
Volpean
Marxism
As
his
correspondence
demonstrates,
in
the
early
1960s
Louis
Althusser
was
particularly
interested
in
Italian
Marxism,
especially
in
the
current
led
by
Galvano
Della
Volpe.
The
present
paper
argues
that
the
Althusserian-Della
Volpean
link
is
far
from
a
biographical
accident.
On
the
contrary,
it
is
firmly
rooted
in
a
robust
but
original
reading
of
Marx's
work.
In
contrast
to
both
the
dialectical-materialist
orthodoxy
of
traditional
and
Soviet
Marxism
and
the
humanist
inclinations
of
Western
Marxism,
Althusser's
and
the
Della
Volpeans'
insistence
on
the
radical
difference
between
Marx
and
Hegel
attests
their
attempt
to
detach
Marxism
from
its
allegedly
Idealist
or
historicist
roots.
According
to
both
interpretations,
Marx's
"rupture"
with
Hegel's
philosophy
lays
the
foundations
for
his
turn
to
a
scientific
attitude
towards
the
study
of
society.
In
Althusserian
and
Della
Volpean
Marxism,
"Capital"
is
very
much
seen
as
a
work
of
social
science,
to
prove
which
both
schools
resort
to
comparisons
between
Marx's
method
and
classic
standards
of
philosophy
of
science
(French
epistemology
and
post-Galilean
scientific
method,
respectively).
The
paper
then
concludes
by
arguing
that
framing
Marxism
in
modern
epistemological
terms
provided
the
basis
for
a
fruitful
research
programme
in
the
social
sciences.
Katja
Praznik
and
sexuality,
and
thereby
also
the
traditional
view
that
privileged
a
class
politics
rooted
in
capitalist
production.
Here
I
argue
for
an
alternative
understanding
of
production
and
labour,
rooted
in
Marxs
distinction
between
abstract
labour
(in
the
realm
of
value)
and
concrete
labour
(in
the
realm
of
use-value).
While
the
former
is
historically
restricted
to
capitalism,
and
imprisoned
in
both
its
production
relations
and
its
ideology,
the
latter
refers
to
the
immanent
relation
between
humanity
and
nature,
which
privileges
the
overall
process
of
social
reproduction
and
transcends
that
historical
restriction.
If
the
historical
role
of
the
working
class
remains
the
abolition
of
all
classes,
it
will
be
founded
upon
the
unity
of
purpose
that
underpins
concrete
labour
to
meet
social
needs.
The
challenge
is
to
develop
that
unity
of
purpose
into
a
popular
alternative
to
the
rule
of
money.
Nat
Raha
Community
protests
and
social
movements
have
become
a
normalized
part
of
everyday
life
in
former
township
and
informal
settlements.
These
practices
of
democratic
voice
and
resistance
have
met
violent
responses
from
the
state.
In
the
time
of
Marikana,
we
see
echoes
of
an
apartheid
past
where
race
and
class
are
combined
so
that
the
poors
of
South
Africa
remain
peripheral
to
the
development
of
a
nation.
Participation
has
been
shaped
in
a
democratic
South
Africa
in
line
with
notions
of
good
governance.
The
resultant
closure
of
spaces
of
resistance
and
social
movements
converges
with
historically
disadvantaged
race
and
class
identities.
Whether
these
movements
can
be
scaled
up
to
a
collective
response
which
breaks
the
narrow
confines
of
participation
and
re-establishes
water
as
a
human
right
as
more
important
than
water
as
an
economic
good,
remains
to
be
seen.
Nora
Rathzel
&
David
Uzzell
"Especially
since
2006
trade
unions
in
the
global
north
and
the
global
south
as
well
as
international
trade
union
federations
and
confederations
have
been
developing
strategies
against
climate
change.
There
are
many
obstacles
in
the
way
of
trade
union
strategies
for
climate
change
mitigation
and
adaptation.
One
of
the
most
decisive
is
the
policy
conflict
between
unions
in
the
global
north
and
the
global
south.
While
there
are
north-north
and
south-south
differences,
the
conflicts
between
trade
unions
in
the
global
north
and
the
global
south
have
their
origins
both
in
the
unequal
living
conditions
of
workers
and
the
unequal
power
relations
between
unions
in
the
global
south
and
the
global
north.
Based
on
two
research
projects
investigating
trade
unions
environmental
strategies
in
Brazil,
South
Africa,
India,
Sweden,
and
the
UK,
we
discuss
the
different
ways
in
which
unions
of
the
global
north
and
south
assess
the
causes
and
consequences
of
climate
change
and
the
relationship
between
labour
and
nature.
While
in
both
hemispheres
the
protection
of
jobs
and
the
protection
of
nature
need
to
go
hand
in
hand,
it
is
mainly
in
unions
of
the
global
south
that
Capital
is
seen
as
exploiting
both
the
earth
and
the
worker.
This
creates
conflicts
between
northern
and
southern
unions
concerning
the
development
of
climate
change
strategies.
Submission"
Paula
Rauhala
"How
the
West
German
New
Marx
Reading
(Neue
Marx-Lektre)
was
received
in
socialist
countries?
West
German
philosopher
Hans-Georg
Backhaus
first
presented
his
monetary
interpretation
of
Marxs
value
theory
in
juxtaposition
with
Soviet
philosopher
Evald
Ilyenkovs
understanding
of
Marxs
theory
of
value.
In
the
second
part
of
his
series
of
essays
Materialien
zur
Rekonstruktion
Marxschen
Werttheorie
in
1975
Backhaus
quotes
Ilyenkov
stating
that:
[t]heoretical
definitions
of
value
as
such
can
only
be
obtained
by
considering
a
certain
objective
economic
reality
capable
of
existing
before,
outside,
and
independently
of
all
those
phenomena
that
later
developed
on
its
basis
[...]
this
reality
is
direct
exchange
of
one
commodity
for
another
commodity.
Backhaus
states
that
Ilyenkov,
due
to
his
premonetary
and
historicist
understanding,
can't
make
a
difference
between
Marxian
and
Ricardian
theory
of
value.
But
Ricardo
and
Marx
significantly
differ
on
their
understanding
of
the
nature
of
value-objectivity.
Ricardian
labour
theory
of
value
leaves
the
mystifications
brought
about
by
the
value-form
intact.
In
Backhauss
reading
it
is
important
that
Marx's
critique
of
political
economy
is
not
just
an
economic
theory
but
rather
a
critique
concerning
the
perverted
form
of
socialisation
of
labour
through
its
products.
Later
Backhaus
has
recommended
Ilyenkovs
Dialectics
of
the
Abstract
and
the
Concrete
in
Marxs
Capital
to
his
readers,
naming
Ilyenkov
as
a
theoretician
who
understood
the
importance
of
Hegels
philosophy
in
Marxs
work.
Also
Ilyenkov
showed
interest
in
Backhaus's
work.
He
translated
into
Russian
Backhaus's
essay
Zur
Dialektik
der
Wertform.
Elsewhere
Ilyenkov
judges
Backhaus
interpretation
on
value
as
Fichtean.
Peter
Ruben,
a
philosopher
from
GDR,
critiqued
Backhauss
interpretation
on
value
theory
as
Hegelian.
Ruben
himself,
just
like
Backhaus
and
Ilyenkov,
paid
a
considerable
attention
at
Hegels
Science
of
Logic
in
his
reading
of
Marx.
Together
with
the
economist
Hans
Wager
Ruben
wrote
an
article
on
socialist
form
of
value,
encountering
fierce
criticisms
in
GDR.
Besides
Backhaus,
Ruben
discusses
also
other
West
German
theoreticians
and
topics
of
the
New
Marx
Reading,
or
the
Capital-logic
(Kapitallogik),
as
he
names
it.
Ruben
develops
his
ideas
in
a
dialogue
with
the
works
of
Alfred
Schmidt,
Helmut
Reichelt
and
Hans-Jrgen
Schanz,
Grundrisse
and
the
first
German
edition
of
the
Capital.
Aditya
Ray
&
Jayprakash
Sharma
order
to
grasp
better
the
dynamics
of
neoliberal
expansion
and
the
resulting
counter-
movements
in
various
underdeveloped
regions
of
the
Global
South.
Heterodox
schools
such
as
classical
substantivst
as
well
as
postcolonial
streams
exhibit
divergent
understandings
of
capital
accumulation
and
capitalist
development,
which
often
sit
uncomfortably
with
the
Marxist
frame
of
analysis
providing
sometimes
complementary,
sometimes
competing
justifications
for
uneven/underdevelopment
in
the
Global
periphery.
We
believe
however,
that
specific
intellectual
contributions
such
as
Polanyis
(1944)
fundamental
notion
of
the
of
fictitious
commodities
(relating
to
land-labour-and-money)
along
with
Sanyals
(2007)
seminal
idea
of
wasteland
of
capital
a
condition
specific
to,
and
characteristic
of,
post-colonial
capitalism,
read
not
in
isolation
but
in
consonance,
are
useful
as
well
as
critical
concepts
for
sharpening
our
understanding
of
specific
processes
of
neoliberal
capitalist
accumulation
as
well
as
the
ensuing
tumult
at
the
very
margins
of
global
capitalism.
By
ensconcing
the
narrative
about
the
struggle
stemming
from
the
land
grab
by
multinational
mining
corporations
in
resource-rich
but
abjectly
backward
tribal
regions
of
Chhattisgarh
(India)
in
the
above
dynamic
neo
Marixan-heterodox
framework,
the
paper
will
attempt
to
tackle
the
dilemma
of
how,
even
with
the
ostensible
presence
of
severe
class
antagonism
and
resistance
to
structural
relations
of
power
at
such
sites
of
dispossession,
the
structural
hold
of
the
state-corporate
capital
seems
to
negotiate
and
persist
over
considerable
lengths
of
time."
Gianfranco
Rebucini
evidence
that
these
attempts
have
more
and
more
relied
on
a
blurring
of
the
traditional
line
between
'progressive'
and
'reactionary'
demands,
in
particular
in
the
domain
of
sexualities.
However,
an
inquiry
into
LGB
politics
that
merely
takes
into
account
the
normalization
of
subjectivities,
identities
and
practices
obscures
the
more
conjunctural
dynamics
at
stake
in
current
far-right
victimization
of
national-white
queer
bodies.
We
would
argue
that
these
attempts
reflect
a
project
of
undermining
antagonisms
based
on
sexuality.
This
is
part
of
a
more
general
strategy
of
building
a
historical
bloc
through
a
dual
process:
obscuring
social
relations
(of
sexualities,
gender
and
class)
on
the
one
hand,
atomizing
potential
communities
of
resistance
on
the
other.
This
boils
down
to
a
horizon
of
strong
sexual
hierarchies
(where
heterosexuality
remains
the
main
way
of
organizing
production
and
reproduction)
in
a
social
fabric
politicized
through
the
rejection
of
the
non-white
'Other'.
This
implies
that
an
exclusive
focus
on
norms
entraps
left
political
strategy
in
a
power/resistance
game,
preventing
it
to
confront
emerging
sexual/hegemonic
projects.
We
argue
instead
that
left
strategies
aiming
at
transforming
the
sexual
organization
of
production
and
reproduction,
in
an
expansive
dynamic
of
social
alliances,
have
generally
more
political
purchase
and
are
more
conducive
to
undermining
what
is
nowadays
meant
by
'homonationalism'."
Tommaso
Redolfi
Riva
Critique and Presentation: Bailey and Ricardo in Marx's Dialectic of the Form of Value
"Marxs
critique
of
David
Ricardo
represents
a
topic
that
has
often
been
debated.
The
same
cannot
be
said
of
his
criticism
of
Samuel
Bailey,
which
has
for
a
long
time
remained
in
the
shade.
My
aim
in
this
paper
is
not
to
reconstruct
the
role
of
the
works
of
Samuel
Bailey
and
Davis
Ricardo
in
the
development
of
Marxs
critique
of
political
economy
from
a
historical
point
of
view.
My
aim
is
rather
a
theoretical
one,
that
is,
to
show
that
Ricardo
and
Bailey
represent
two
fundamental
moments
of
Marxs
presentation.
Moment
is
here
used
in
a
non-generic
sense:
what
I
wish
to
highlight
is
that
as
they
are
presented
in
Marxs
critique
of
political
economy,
Ricardos
and
Baileys
theories
of
value
represent
two
opposite
and
contradictory
sides
of
the
category
of
value.
After
having
presented
Marxs
critique
of
Ricardo
and
Bailey
I
will
try
to
reflect
on
the
deficiencies
of
classical
and
vulgar
political
economy
from
a
methodological
point
of
view.
Finally
I
intend
to
trace
back
the
methodological
lacks
of
political
economy
to
the
object
of
political
economy
itself:
I
will
try
to
present
Ricardo
and
Baileys
theories
of
value
as
historically
determined
ways
of
existence
of
consciences,
socially
valid
form
of
thought."
Jos
Reis
Ambivalence
and
gloom
on
the
edge
of
the
Atlantic:
the
post-2008
global
crisis
in
Portugal
The
post-2008
global
financial
crisis
unleashed
a
storm
not
only
in
the
material
order
but
also
in
the
symbolic
order.
It
has
shaken
the
hegemony
of
neoclassical
economics
epistemologically,
of
neoliberalism
politically,
while
on
the
cultural
realm
its
impact,
more
varied
across
countries
and
harder
to
summarise
in
one
term,
is
nonetheless
unmistakable.
In
the
case
of
Portugal,
it
is
interesting
how,
despite
a
wide
diversity
of
discourses
in
the
mass
media,
bestseller
books,
through
to
more
academic
accounts,
the
hegemonic
cultural
appropriation
of
the
crisis
that
seems
to
emerge
is
framed
around
a
particular
national
essentialism
of
moral
overtones.
This
kind
of
negative
nationalism
mythologises
the
people
as
a
uniform
mass
who,
rather
than
grand
virtues,
is
instead
uniquely
beset
by
grand
defects
that
ultimately
are
to
blame
for
the
crisis
and
legitimate
all
subsequent
suffering.
This
nebulous
but
very
operative
common
sense
re-invokes
images
from
Portugals
colonial
past,
and
its
particular
coloniser/colonised
ambivalence,
replaced
in
the
post-1980s
period
of
European
integration
for
an
imagination
of
the
Centre
(we
are
a
developed
country),
but
not
quite
suppressed.
At
the
same
time,
and
at
least
for
the
time
being,
it
pervades
projections
of
the
future
in
the
cultural
realm,
from
media
discourse
to
essay
to
art,
with
a
dystopian
stance.
This
communication
draws
on
an
on-going
research
on
how
ideas
of
economic
crisis
are
created
and
appropriated
in
economics,
politics
and
culture.
Matthieu
Olga
The
Lure
of
Agency
and
subjectivity:
Reflecting
on
Hall
and
Laclau
and
the
problem
of
agency
and
practice
in
Marxist
theory
With
the
passing
of
Stuart
Hall
and
Ernesto
Laclau
there
has
been
a
wave
of
interest
in
putting
their
work
in
perspective.
In
this
paper
I
want
to
explore
critically
a
common
if
differentiated
problem
that
Hall
and
Laclau
represent
within
the
context
of
the
post-Marxist
engagements
with
Marxism:
The
lure
of
agency
and
subjectivity.
Both
thinker
in
different
ways
expanded
the
possibilities
of
agency
and
subjectivity
within
a
structurally
and
socially
conceived
analysis
of
the
social
relations
of
production
within
the
materialist
conception
of
history.
What
both
accounts
did
was
to
widen
the
conceptual
space
for
agency
within
social
and
cultural
context
and
privilege
the
subjective
engagement
with
social
contexts
and
conjunctures.
In
doing
so,
they
allowed
new
possibilities
for
a
more
fluid,
plastic,
culturally
discursive
and
phenomenologically
conceived
development
within
Marxist
theory
which
in
turn
encouraged
an
inclusive
and
more
reformist
politics.
Whilst
this
offered
possibilities
that
revivified
Marxist
theory,
it
failed
to
grasp
a
crucial
problem
-
the
lure
of
agency
and
subjectivity
discursively
constituted
failed
to
account
for
the
problem
of
determinations
and
hegemonic
power,
which
were
dismissed
rather
than
engaged
with.
The
proper
terrain
for
the
meeting
of
agency
and
subjectivity
-
and
for
an
accounting
of
its
import
beyond
its
seductive
lure,
is
in
a
concept
of
practice
that
recognizes
precisely
the
materiality
of
human
subjectivity
in
context
and
conjuncture
as
constituting
definite
determinant
structures.
This
paper
will
describe
the
terms
of
this
terrain
and
seek
to
articulate
some
of
the
problem
it
raises
for
Marxists
in
both
accounting
for
agency
and
subjectivity
in
their
proper
place
and
recognizing
the
real
problems
of
building
of
revolutionary
movement
and
politics
Bruce
Robinson
Jen
Roesch
Mechanisms
of
Dependency,
Control
and
Appropriation:
The
State
and
Sexual
Violence
in
the
US
"Sexual
violence
is
often
analyzed
and
discussed
as
being
the
product
of
a
rape
culture.
But
such
violence
has
been
endemic
to
and
intimately
entwined
with
the
history
of
capitalism
in
the
United
States.
Cultural
constructions
and
popular
understandings
of
sexual
and
gender-based
violence
have
shifted
in
different
historical
periods
-
in
relation
both
to
developments
within
capitalism
and
in
response
to
struggles.
The
state
has
played
a
central
role
in
organizing
the
response
to
such
violence
as
well
as
these
popular
understandings.
It
has
consistently
done
so
in
ways
that
continue
to
reinforce
and
reproduce
womens
dependency
and
second-class
citizenship.
Moreover,
state
responses
have
frequently
strengthened
other
repressive
and
oppressive
aspects
of
American
capitalism
most
centrally
racism.
This
paper
will
examine
this
role
as
well
as
the
contradictory
relationship
of
many
of
the
movements
against
sexual
violence
to
it.
Paradoxically,
many
of
the
reforms
advocated
and
won
by
the
feminist
movement
have
helped
to
strengthen
institutions
and
social
relations
that
increase
the
marginalization
and
dependency
of
women
particularly
working
class
women
and
women
of
color.
I
will
situate
the
persistence,
and
current
intensification,
of
violence
within
this
history
and
relationship."
Graciela
Romero
Eduardo
Romero
Dianderas
Indigenous
labor,
ethnicity
and
capital
accumulation
in
the
margins
of
the
State:
the
case
of
timber
industry
networks
in
Peruvian
Amazonia
"In
this
presentation
I
offer
an
economic,
political
and
historical
account
on
how
extractive
capitalism
has
expanded
and
reproduced
in
the
context
of
the
Peruvian
Amazon
lowlands.
First,
I
outline
the
main
challenges
that
extractive
industries
faced
in
the
context
of
early
capitalist
expansive
cycles
in
Amazonia
during
the
late
19th
Century.
Particularly,
I
focus
on
the
way
that
labor
scarcity
and
the
absence
of
a
regional
workforce
were
thought
of
by
emergent
regional
elites
and
entrepreneurs
during
the
early
State
attempts
to
articulate
a
regional
space
in
Amazonia.
I
associate
these
reflections
with
the
marginal
character
historically
attributed
to
Amazonian
territories,
which
have
been
from
thereon
represented
as
boundary
spaces
with
anomalous
economic
and
political
characteristics.
Secondly,
I
offer
a
description
of
how
this
context
informed
the
development
of
a
body
of
non
wage-based
labor
appropriation
strategies
that
dynamically
combined
seduction
and
violence
in
order
to
expand
available
workforce
among
indigenous
populations
of
Amazonia.
I
argue
that
during
this
timeframe
a
well-established
body
of
informal
labor
appropriation
strategies
came
to
be
and
proved
a
certain
exploitative
efficacy
in
articulating
indigenous
workforce
to
international
commodity
chains.
The
emergence
of
these
labor
appropriation
strategies
had
the
double
effect
of
expanding
the
material
flows
of
extractive
capitalism
over
extensive
and
remote
areas
of
the
tropical
rainforest,
while
at
the
same
time
changing
the
way
that
forests,
market
agents
and
commodities
related
to
the
production
of
new
indigenous
subjectivities
and
economic
habits.
Thirdly,
I
turn
to
present
time
in
order
examine
how
these
labor
appropriation
strategies
have
evolved
throughout
time
and
how
they
allow
for
particular
forms
of
capital
accumulation
processes
in
contemporary
Peruvian
Amazonia.
Drawing
on
some
recent
ethnographic
and
quantitative
data,
I
offer
a
description
of
how
racialized
exchanges,
marginal
processes
of
statemaking
and
commercial
international
pressures
intersect
in
specific
local
settings
of
the
Peruvian
rainforest
in
order
to
make
possible
the
production
of
value
and
the
accumulation
of
extractive
capital
at
a
regional
scale.
Finally,
I
discuss
how
these
analytics
can
produce
interesting
elements
for
considering
how
localized
capitalist
projects,
the
production
of
non
wage-based
labor
subjectivities,
and
tropical
rainforests
come
to
be
in
the
margins
of
contemporary
South
American
States.
John
Rose
Lenin
Luxemburg
War
&
Revolution:
Lenin's
criticism
of
Luxemburg's
anti-war
Junius
pamphlet
"Luxemburgs
first
world
war
Junius
pamphlet,
written
in
prison,
was
arguably
the
greatest
anti
war
statement
of
the
last
century.
Its
haunting
theme,
Socialism
or
Barbarism,
prophetically
cast
its
shadow
over
the
last
century
and
continues
to
do
so
now.
Junius
was
also
uncompromising
in
its
hostility
to
Kautskys
pro-war
German
Socialist
Party,
the
SPD,
still
claiming
to
be
a
Marxist
party,
with
a
majority
in
the
German
parliament.
Yet
Lenin,
whilst
recognising
it
was
written
by
an
outstanding
comrade
in
the
revolutionary
socialist
tradition,
(he
didnt
know
RL
was
the
author),
was
uneasy
about
Junius.
(Collected
Works
Volume
22,
pages
305-319,
http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/jul/junius-pamphlet.htm).
Critically,
he
challenges
the
failure
to
break
organisationally
with
Kautsky.
This
captured
a
fundamental
Marxist
principle
uniquely
developed
by
Lenin.
Politics
cannot
be
separated
mechanically
from
organisation.
Junius
risked
failure
by
not
giving
distinct
organisational
expression
to
the
politics
of
its
powerful
anti
war
sentiment.
Kautsky
had
claimed
the
party
had
to
respond
to
the
intensely
patriotic
mood
that
had
swept
through
the
workers
movement.
Lenin
had
already
dismissed
this
as
treachery,
in
'The
Collapse
of
the
Second
International'."
Catherine
Rottenberg
Rouse
Precarity
and/or
the
new
normal?
in
Pakistan:
Neoliberalization,
gendered
labor
regimes
and
informalization
"Since
the
eighties,
there
has
been
increasingly
attention
paid
to
the
informal
sector
both
in
the
advanced
capitalist
countries
as
well
as
in
many
parts
of
the
global
south.
De
Sotos
now
well
known
work,
The
Other
Path,
published
in
1989,
brought
this
to
phenomena
into
the
mainstream,
as
a
major
component
of
peripheral
economies.
Written
at
a
moment
when
the
Fujimoro
regime
in
Peru
was
committed
to
privatization
in
Peru,
and
to
retrenchment
of
the
state
sector,
De
Soto
and
the
Institute
for
Liberty
and
Democracy,
made
virtue
out
of
necessity,
and
sought
to
push
for
laws
that
would
bring
the
informal
sector
under
the
ambit
of
the
state.
The
motivation
was
both
political
and
economic.
De
Sotos
formulation
has
since
dominated
conventional
political
analyses
in
the
U.S.
whereby
informality
and
criminality
are
conflated
with
each
other.
This
perspective
has
allowed
for
ever
greater
degrees
of
policing
and
surveillance
of
marginalized
populations,
and
increased
incarceration
of
the
poor,
and
communities
of
color.
Saskia
Sassens
work
on
globalization,
coming
almost
ten
years
after
De
Sotos,
also
emphasizes
the
increasing
incidence
of
informalization,
but
in
a
vastly
different
register:
she
argues
that
this
sectors
expansion
is
not
only
an
issue
confronting
peripheral
economies,
but
a
rapidly
growing
element
within
advanced
economies.
She
situates
this
development
squarely
within
the
ambit
of
late
capitalism,
and
argues
that
the
ascendance
of
finance
capital
in
todays
marketized
global
economy
are
its
driving
force.
In
many
ways,
her
theorization
of
the
contemporary
turn
to
informalization
echoes
classic
Marxist
understandings
of
the
workings
of
capital
and
the
structural
tendency
within
capitalism
to
render
labor
increasingly
redundant,
and
pushing
such
labor
into
flexible
and
casual
labor
regimes.
While
Sassens
work
provides
a
useful
and
necessary
corrective
to
De
Sotos
earlier
treatment
of
informalization,
it
is
pitched
at
a
level
of
generalization
that
demands
greater
attentiveness
to
local
conditions
under
which
such
informalization
takes
place
within
specific
histories
of
spaces
within
the
global
south
itself.
This
is
where
a
close
reading
of
the
Pakistani
context
is
insightful:
based
on
studies
conducted
by
scholar-activists
within
Pakistan,
I
hope
to
demonstrate
the
relationship
between
the
state,
international
regimes
(both
multilateral
and
economic),
and
local
forces.
Through
a
carefully
periodized
and
space
specific
analysis,
I
hope
to
explicate
the
centrality
of
gender
to
contemporary
informalization
(as
many
of
the
sources
I
draw
upon
suggest),
but
also
to
problematize
certain
assumptions
between
work
and
womens
emancipation,
between
productive
and
unproductive
labor,
production
and
social
reproduction,
and
conclude
with
strategies
to
address
this
current
political-economic
turn.
While
specific
to
Pakistan,
my
expectation
is
that
this
paper
will
provoke
a
necessary
and
much
needed
discussion
on
effective
strategies
designed
to
further
labor
struggles,
as
well
as
subject
our
own
modes
of
categorization
to
a
more
critical
scrutiny."
Camilla
Royle
Rbner
Hansen
Whereas
Marx
speaks
about
the
economic
and
structural
aspects
of
the
base,
I
propose
that
from
the
point
of
view
of
living
labour
it
is
existential
and
organisational.
To
start
at
the
base
thus
means
to
start
from
the
many
ways
in
which
proletarians
aim
to
satisfy
their
needs
and
pursue
their
desires,
and
understands
capital's
ability
to
organise
labour
as
based
on
its
ability
to
monopolise
and
regulate
the
means
and
the
relations
of
desire
and
need.
I
ask:
what
happens
to
the
classical
Marxist
concept
of
class-consciousness,
if
we
take
consciousness
to
be
secondary:
the
self-consciousness
of
the
processes
by
which
needs
and
desires
compose
in
common
resistant
strategies,
and
the
speculative
awareness
of
the
revolutionary
potentialities
of
such
processes?
As
the
Black
Panthers
and
feminist
Marxists
such
as
Silvia
Federici
and
Mariarosa
Dalla
Costa
have
shown,
need
and
desire
is
a
key
field
of
struggle,
one
that
is
much
broader
than
the
capital-labour
struggle
over
exploitation.
This
paper
aims
to
propose
a
theory
of
resistant
and
revolutionary
practices,
which
does
not
start
from
consciousness
but
from
the
composition
and
organisation
of
needs
and
desires
which
are,
at
a
given
time
and
place,
structurally
unsatisfied
or
blocked
by
capital."
Eric-John
Russell
The
following
abstract
is
intended
for
consideration
in
the
Critical
Theory
stream
at
the
conference.
While
it
might
be
said,
correctly
or
not,
that
Theodor
Adornos
relationship
with
Marxs
critique
of
political
economy
is
punctured
by
the
unease
of
an
asphyxiating
cloud
of
omnipotent
rationality,
both
critics
share
in
a
scrutiny
for
the
universally
structuring
mechanism
of
the
exchange
relation.
The
aim
of
my
presentation
will
be
to
clear
a
path
for
this
shared
perspective
and
attempt
to
arbitrate
two
thinkers
often
mired
in
theoretically
tumultuous
friction
in
their
respective
critiques
of
modern
capitalist
society.
Within
both
Dialectic
of
Enlightenment
and
Aesthetic
Theory,
Adorno
formulates
a
distinction
between
the
concept
of
mimesis
and
its
rationalization.
It
will
be
the
purpose
of
the
present
text
to
explore
the
extent
to
which
this
rationalization
of
mimesis
can
be
reconciled
with
Marxs
theory
of
commodity
fetishism.
That
is,
how
might
the
history
of
the
mimetic
faculty,
proceeding
in
accordance
with
the
development
of
rationality
and
the
development
of
sacrifice
and
exchange,
correspond
to
the
fetish
character
of
commodities?
As
will
be
demonstrated,
both
processes
are
grounded
in
the
adaptation
of
a
self
to
objective
forces
of
domination
consecrated
through
the
principle
of
identity
and
equivalence.
I
will
first
sketch
the
fundamental
characteristics
of
mimetic
comportment
before
proceeding
to
its
rationalization,
or
as
Adorno
refers
to
it,
its
repression.
From
there,
a
brief
discussion
on
commodity
fetishism
will
facilitate
an
attempt
to
reconcile
these
seemingly
disparate
criticisms
of
modern
society.
Mario
Saenz
"The
2011
Egyptian
uprising
constituted
a
momentous
event
in
modern
Egyptian
history.
The
uprising
can
be
theorized
as
a
response
to
the
neoliberal
project
that
had
come
to
dominate
Egypt
through
the
policies
of
the
ruling
class.
However,
three
years
on
it
appears
that
the
while
the
configuration
of
social
forces
within
the
ruling
class
may
have
shifted,
neoliberalism
continues
to
dominate
the
Egyptian
political
economy.
The
first
part
of
this
paper
attempts
a
historical
genealogy
of
the
Egyptian
ruling
class
since
1952.
Through
using
Gramscian
and
neo-Gramscian
concepts
this
paper
shows
that
since
2011
specific
actors
within
the
Egyptian
ruling
classconceptualized
as
fractions
of
capitalhave
attempted
to
reconfigure
the
ruling
class
without
changing
dominant
forms
of
capitalist
accumulation,
as
well
as
to
show
how
the
ruling
class
created
the
conditions
that
produced
the
uprising
itself.
However
it
would
be
a
mistake
to
ignore
the
resistance
on
the
part
of
subaltern
groups.
The
ruling
class
is
constantly
in
a
complex
relationship
with
the
subaltern
classes.
Specific
communities
within
the
category
of
the
subaltern
challenge
and
subvert
hegemony.
The
second
part
of
this
paper
will
thus
trace
the
different
fractions
of
labour
that
represent
these
challenges
to
neoliberal
capital.
Through
an
analysis
of
both
the
fractions
of
capital
and
labour,
the
paper
attempts
to
show
why
neoliberal
capitalism
continues
to
dominate
Egypt
as
well
as
why
this
domination
is
not
hegemonic."
Sune
Sandbeck
Uneven and Combined Development and the Sovereign Spaces of Offshore Finance
The
revival
of
the
historical
materialist
concept
of
uneven
and
combined
development
(U&CD)
within
the
field
of
International
Relations
has
refocused
attention
on
the
importance
of
examining
the
interaction
between
different
tempos
of
development
across
space
and
time.
What
has
emerged
from
these
discussions
is
a
theoretical
appreciation
of
the
contingent,
multilinear
and
interactive
trajectories
of
capitalist
state
formation
across
a
global
spatial
terrain
riven
by
social,
economic,
and
geographical
unevenness.
The
proliferation
of
offshore
financial
centres
(OFCs)
in
the
past
few
decades
is
a
subject
that
has
tended
to
fall
outside
the
purview
of
these
debates
and
the
present
paper
suggests
that
the
framework
of
U&CD
sheds
considerable
light
on
the
contingent
historical
context
out
of
which
OFCs
emerged.
However,
the
growing
significance
of
offshore
finance
to
the
global
economy
has
altered
the
very
meaning
of
unevenness
by
rapidly
shifting
the
spatial
contours
and
possibilities
of
capitalist
accumulation,
requiring
a
continual
rearticulation
of
sovereign
power.
The
particular
manner
in
which
offshore
finance
intensifies
some
of
the
central
contradictions
of
capitalism
forces
us
to
rethink
the
spatial
scope
of
U&CD
and
I
examine
how
a
revised
conceptualization
might
enhance
our
understanding
of
the
relationship
between
state
sovereignty
and
capitalist
accumulation.
Nikil
Saval
the
New
York
regional
plan;
and
the
separation
of
the
suburban
campus
setting,
which
gave
rise
to
the
discourse
of
the
knowledge
worker.
Finally
I
will
discuss
contemporary
conditions
of
mass
disaggregation,
at
the
same
time
that
pervasive
casualization
has
brought
talk
of
a
new
proletariat,
or
precariat,
among
the
declassed
white
collar
worker,
as
a
source
of
a
renewal
of
social
protest.
I
will
examine
these
claims
alongside
the
spatial
effects
of
disaggregation
within
white
collar
workforces,
with
many
of
the
factory-like
settings
displaced
to
global
south
countries,
where
they
in
turn
occupy
higher
levels
of
status.
I
will
conclude
with
some
reflections
on
the
current
relationship
between
of
space
and
the
middle
class."
Tina
Schivatcheva
Accidental
hegemon?
Exporting
the
core
chimera
-
Modell
Deutschland
in
the
Eastern
European
periphery
Reunification
has
turned
Germany
into
a
central
actor,
and
then
the
central
actor
in
determining
European
affairs.
Meanwhile
in
the
Eastern
European
periphery,
Germany
has
become
the
indisputable
economic
hegemon.
The
discussion
uses
neo-Gramscian
analysis,
cultural
political
economy
and
Varieties
of
Capitalism
(VoC)
perspectives
to
analyse
the
current
trade
and
socio-economic
relations
of
Germany,
Ukraine
and
Bulgaria
Characteristic
of
the
socio-political
and
socio-economic
transformation
of
Eastern
Europe
is
that
by
the
early
2000s
the
whole
region
had
adopted
the
standards
and
institutional
underpinnings
of
economic
freedom
and
openness
usual
in
Western
market
economies.
Bulgaria
and
Ukraine
have
been
characterized
as
Liberal
Market
Economies
(LMEs),
which
differ
in
their
achieved
levels
of
liberalisation,
privatisation,
and
market-oriented
institution
building.
Meanwhile
Germany,
the
paradigmatic
Coordinated
Market
Economy
(CME)
and
the
birthplace
of
the
tripartist
Modell
Deutschland
has
progressively
strengthened
its
economic
presence
in
Eastern
Europe.
German
economy
(GDP
3.5
trillion)
towers
above
the
economies
of
Bulgaria
and
Ukraine.
For
more
than
10
years
both
Bulgaria
and
Ukraine
have
held
negative
trade
balances
with
the
Bundesrepublik,
amounting
to
the
joint
total
sum
of
approximately
56
billion
dollars
cumulative
profits
(UNCOMTRADE).
Both
Ukraine
and
Bulgaria
have
been
consumers
of
German
industrial
goods
and
exporters
of
low
value-added
products.
Yet
in
spite
of
the
decadal-long
trade
asymmetries
in
favour
of
Germany,
there
have
been
only
a
token
of
complaints
about
the
paucity
of
German
FDI.
Germany's
current
role
goes
beyond
economically
'influencing'
the
region.
A
traditional
realist/neorealist
definition
prescribes
hegemony
as
'the
holding
by
one
state
of
a
preponderance
of
power
in
the
international
systems,
so
that
it
can
single-handedly
dominate
the
rules
and
arrangements
by
which
international
political
and
economic
relations
are
conducted.'
However,
modern
Germany
projects
its
power
not
via
military
force
or
direct
control,
but
by
indirect
control
of
the
rules
and
agendas
(hegemony).
A
discussion
on
the
nature
of
hegemony
should
also
take
into
consideration
Gramsci's
analyses,
in
which
he
emphasizes
the
importance
of
the
voluntaristic
aspect
of
hegemony,
distinguishing
between
'domination'
(coercion,
power)
and
'hegemony'
(ideas,
persuasion,
consensus).
More
recently,
Ikenberry
and
Kupchan
explore
the
relationship
between
power
and
socialization
as
complementary
components
of
hegemony.
They
elaborate
that
'socialization'
serves
as
an
'effective
instrument
of
hegemonic
power
during
critical
historical
periods
in
which
international
change
coincides
with
domestic
crises
in
secondary
states.'
Thus,
although
a
preponderance
of
power
in
material
(economic)
instruments
may
facilitate
the
initial
socialization,
in
the
long
run
it
also
requires
non-material
instruments,
such
as
ideas,
norms,
and
values.
The
analysis
argues
that
the
post-socialist
transition
of
Bulgaria
and
Ukraine
has
not
resulted
in
competitive
and
innovative
market
economies,
but
in
a
loss
of
economic,
social
and
human
capital.
Chronic
political
and
economic
instability
has
increased
the
social
acceptability
of
the
CME
model,
considered
to
represent
Germany,
and
consequently
German
prestige
in
Eastern
Europe.
Thus,
Germany
has
been
endowed
with
the
exemplary
able
tutor
and
Ukraine
and
Bulgaria
-
the
pupils.
Modell
Deutschland
made
in
Bulgaria
and
Ukraine
is
associated
with
the
desirable
qualities
of
stability
and
incrementalism,
innovations
and
good
management
practices.
This
idealized
representation
has
failed
to
distinguish
the
complexities
of
the
socio-economic
development
within
Germany.
Thus,
while
being
eroded
within
Germany
Modell
Deustchland
is
still
attractive
in
Eastern
Europe.
Capturing
the
public
imagination
of
the
Eastern
European
periphery,
the
chimera
of
the
Rhenish
model
has
been
the
most
successful
German
export."
Louis-Georges
Schwartz
Seymour
The
Austerity
State
"It
is
too
often
glibly
assumed
that
austerity
is
a
project
for
downsizing
the
state.
This
ideologeme
is
linked
to
a
series
of
claims
about
the
state
in
the
neoliberal
era,
including
above
all
the
claim
that
the
state
has
been
withdrawing
from
the
economy.
That
ideologeme
is
misplaced.
This
paper
will
argue
that,
while
spending
cuts
and
public
sector
firings
are
the
means
through
which
the
objectives
of
austerity
are
achieved,
and
while
there
are
rational
reasons
for
capitalist
states
to
reduce
the
burden
of
expenditures,
the
long-term
effects
of
austerity
involve
redeploying
state
apparatuses
rather
than
reducing
their
size.
Using
the
examples
of
past
austerity
projects,
and
in
the
light
of
Poulantzian
state
theory,
this
paper
will
argue
that:
The
state
under
austerity
is
neither
reducing
its
scope
nor
withdrawing
from
the
economy,
but
is
rather
changing
the
character
and
mode
of
its
extensive
involvement
in
productive
relations.
The
states
cost-cutting
commitments
are
real,
but
are
subordinate
to
its
crisis-management
commitments.
This
in
practice
tends
to
mean
that
opportunities
for
cost-cutting
are
limited
by
the
constant
need
for
the
state
to
assimilate
and
process
the
crisis
tendencies
in
the
economy.
Austerity
is
a
response
to
capitalist
crisis,
and
as
such
is
part
of
a
project
which
demands
more
state
intervention
rather
than
less.
State
institutions
act
within
a
context
of
class
and
political
struggles,
and
must
register
the
strengths
of
opposing
sides
in
these
struggles.
This
does
not
mean
that
the
state
simply
tallies
the
balance
of
forces
on
either
side
at
any
given
moment.
It
has
its
own
resistant
materiality,
itself
the
result
of
accumulated
outcomes
of
previous
class
and
political
struggles.
It
possesses
a
certain
selectivity
in
favour
of
particular
strategies
as
a
result
of
this,
and
this
determines
the
forms
that
crisis
management
can
take.
The
specific
form
of
crisis
management,
known
as
austerity,
must
be
understood
in
terms
of
the
particular
coalition
of
classes
and
class
fractions
that
dominates
the
state
apparatuses
-
the
power
bloc.
One
effect
of
austerity
is
precisely
to
reorganise
this
power
bloc
to
the
benefit
of
ascendant
or
already
incumbent
class
fractions.
The
relationship
between
a
state
and
the
society
which
it
organises
is
permanently
characterised
by
dysfunction
and
disequilibrium.
This
means
that
no
simple
functionalist
reading
of
austerity
is
possible,
as
it
is
by
no
means
clear
that
everything
the
state
does
can
Sgambati
Leveraging
equity,
securitising
debts:
the
significance
of
modern
banking
in
the
making
of
financialisation
"The
current
debate
on
financialisation
is
changing
our
understanding
of
class
and
class
struggle
(Bryan,
Rafferty
and
Martin
2009),
as
social
property
relations
are
being
progressively
re-conceptualized
in
terms
of
debt
relations
(Ingham
2004,
2008).
This
said,
it
is
not
really
clear
who
in
the
age
of
financialisation
is
indebted
to
whom
and
how
this
affects
the
construction
of
power
relations.
Financialisation
in
effect
signals
the
stabilisation
of
a
capitalist
regime
characterised
by
the
systematic
commodification
of
debt
relations,
a
growth
out
of
measure
of
profit-yielding
financial
instruments,
endemic
speculation,
financial
bubbles
(Knafo
2012;
Hudson
2012):
in
such
a
regime
nobody
is
a
genuine
creditor
because
in
principle
every
proprietor
and
especially
the
financier
-
is
indebted
to
everybody
else
via
a
capillary
infrastructure
of
liquid
financial
relations
encompassing
states
and
markets
altogether.
To
get
a
better
sense
of
how
class
struggle
is
articulated
in
such
a
context
of
institutional
over-indebtedness,
the
paper
aims
to
outline
a
brief
phenomenology
of
the
negotiation
of
value
that
is
at
the
basis
of
modern
banking.
The
latter
is
conventionally
understood
as
a
centralized
form
of
cash
intermediation,
portfolio
management
and
credit-debt
bookkeeping.
Moving
from
a
monetary
understanding,
the
paper
by
contrast
examines
modern
banking
as
the
institutionalisation
of
debt
intermediation
and
the
construction
of
modern
money
as
liquidity.
That
is
to
say,
far
from
mediating
savings,
modern
banking
is
from
principle
involved
with
the
creation
of
money
'out
of
nothing'
in
fact,
with
the
articulation
of
a
monetary
system
of
borrowing
and
lending
capable
of
producing
net
worth,
and
based
upon
a
combination
of
asset
and
liability
management
involving
respectively
leverage
and
securitisation.
The
paper
thus
examines
the
rise
of
English
banking
in
the
second
half
of
the
seventeenth
century.
More
specifically
it
focuses
on:
(a)
the
financial
revolution
initiated
by
goldsmith
bankers,
as
based
on
bank
leverage
(performed
via
bill
discounting);
(b)
the
monetary
revolution
carried
by
the
Bank
of
England
during
the
eighteenth
century,
as
connected
to
the
securitisation
of
the
English
national
debt
and
the
emergence
of
a
liquid
secondary
market
for
public
securities
(Amato
and
Fantacci
2012).
Hence,
without
denying
the
specificities
of
the
current
situation,
the
paper
argues
that
to
grasp
the
significance
of
contemporary
financialisation
we
must
nonetheless
reconsider
the
very
historical
foundations
of
capitalism,
and
in
particular
the
role
of
modern
banking
in
the
production
of
value,
because
it
is
only
from
there
that
we
can
glance
at
the
shining
skyline
of
its
tottering
towers
and
discover
what
lies
today
in
their
shadow.
Nizan
Shaked
Emblematic
of
the
modern
age,
museums
are
at
the
political
crossroads
of
wealth
and
the
public.
Modeled
after
its
European
predecessor,
the
American
museum
perfected
the
formers
reformist
thrust
by
using
a
hybrid
private-public
non-profit
administrative
structure,
where
institutional
governance
has
regularly
been
steered
by
boards
comprised
of
the
upper
echelon.
Artists
in
the
United
States
have,
since
the
late
1960s,
recognized
museums
as
a
stage
where
a
political
drama
is
suspended
in
the
cultural
and
financial
tensions
between
themselves
and
their
work,
professional
personnel
(directors
or
curators),
and
the
museum
board
with
its
oversight
capacities.
A
peculiar
line
of
communication
opened
between
artists
and
the
wealthy,
and
this
paper
will
look
at
key
examples
of
works
that
spoke
directly
to
or
about
patronage.
Universitiesalso
spaces
where
barons
and
boosters
purport
to
share
a
culture
with
intellectuals,
where
conservative
administration
meets
progressive
faculty
and
students
(perhaps
even
revolutionary
on
occasion)differ
from
museums
in
that
the
dialogue
with
wealth
in
the
museum
is
triangulated
by
a
third
entity:
the
public
as
audience.
This
paper
will
discuss
works
staged
with
the
public
in
mind
by
Guerrilla
Art
Action
Group,
Daniel
J.
Martinez,
and
Andrea
Fraser.
I
will
consider
them
within
the
contexts
of
the
brief
yet
significant
forming
of
the
Art
Workers
Coalition
in
the
late
1960s
as
a
reformist
position
of
resistance,
the
efficacy
of
which
was
debated
by
critics
and
artists
such
as
Les
Levine
and
Mel
Ramsden
(of
Art
&
Language),
who
sought
a
more
revolutionary
redefinition
of
art.
The
idea
that
art
could
intervene
into
the
means
of
production
was
subsequently
seen
as
nave
at
best,
after
all,
the
entire
field
is
always
already
super-structural.
But
since
museums
can
offer
insight
into
the
life
cycle
of
case
cultural
transactions,
we
can
also
observe
its
political
and
economic
implications
vis--vis
the
public.
I
will
ground
this
perspective
in
a
work
by
Hans
Haacke,
MoMA
Poll
(1970),
staged
to
engage
the
pubic
in
a
question
about
Nelson
Rockefeller
(then
Governor
of
New
York
State)
in
a
museum
founded
and
governed
by
members
of
the
Rockefeller
family,
and
the
dialogue
it
elicited
between
the
museum
board
(specifically
David
Rockefeller
of
Chase
Manhattan
Bank)
and
its
administration.
Disrupting
the
liberal
faade
the
museum
would
rather
foreground,
Haackes
work
showed
how
politics
and
money
are
related,
unmasking
the
resemblance
of
NY
to
an
oligarchy
in
hopes
to
point
out
a
speculative
road-map
to
its
demise.
Being
pragmatic,
I
also
track
the
process
by
which
museums
have
contained
such
resistance,
and
how
artists
then
responded
in
return,
culminating
with
Andrea
Frasers
contribution
to
the
Whitney
Biennial
in
2012
titled
Le
1%
Cest
Moi.
Rather
than
revolutionizing
art
itself,
or
hitching
it
to
serve
the
revolution,
these
artists
aimed
their
interventions
to
question
what
ideology
does
the
institutional
structure
serve
and
why
it
is
that
the
public
tolerates
it.
Divya Sharma
Metabolic
Rift
and
Resistance:
Political
Ecology
in
colonial
and
post-colonial
Punjab,
India
"This
paper
will
focus
on
conceptualisations
that
build
on
the
Marxian
concept
of
metabolic
rift
(cf.
Foster,
1999;
Moore,
2011;
McMichael
and
Schneider,
2010),
to
examine
how
an
ecological
lens
helps
rethink
the
Marxist
conception
of
political
agency.
I
argue
that
the
framework
of
metabolic
rift
provides
a
way
of
understanding
how
alienation
effected
through
the
separation
of
labour
from
the
production
of
knowledge,
or
the
division
of
mental
and
menial
labour,
shapes
the
articulation
of
resistance,
by
tracing
the
changing
form
of
agrarian
struggles
and
the
landscape
of
rural
resistance
in
the
Indian
state
of
Punjab
through
the
colonial
and
post-colonial
period.
Technological
interventions
have
been
employed
as
a
way
of
reorganizing
agrarian
production
and
rural
life
in
Punjab
by
the
colonial
and
the
post-colonial
state,
exemplified
by
the
establishment
of
the
canal
system
by
the
British
in
the
late
nineteenth
century,
and
the
Green
Revolution
in
the
1960s.
Today,
the
agrarian
crisis
in
Punjab
is
being
articulated
by
farmers
in
a
way
that
signals
that
ecological
viability
is
contingent
on
restructuring
unequal
social
relations
of
production.
In
this
context,
I
suggest
that
an
analytic
focus
on
how
the
changes
in
the
production
process
and
the
practices
of
work
are
experienced,
in
conjunction
with
the
social
relations,
in
which
they
are
embedded,
is
significant
for
understanding
the
forms
in
which
resistance
is
articulated.
It
also
provides
a
theoretical
framework
for
understanding
both
the
rift
in
and
the
reconstitution
of
socio-ecological
relations
historically
and
experientially.
Stuart
Shields
The
time
for
reform
is
always
now:
The
European
Bank
for
Reconstruction
&
Development
and
the
renewal
of
neoliberalisation
in
Central
Eastern
Europe
after
the
financial
"crisis.
The
paper
interrogates
the
role
of
the
EBRD
in
the
refinement
of
neoliberal
strategies
in
post-communist
transition.
By
drawing
upon
a
Gramscian
critical
political
economy
approach,
the
paper
argues
that
the
EBRD
has
promoted
the
deepening
commodification
of
post-communist
social
relations
through
the
diffusion
of
ideas
centred
round
three
successive
waves
of
neoliberalisation
in
Central
Eastern
Europe
(CEE).
The
EBRD
has
taken
advantage
of
a
series
of
crises
to
redefine
the
relationship
between
national
state
and
regional
and
international
institutions,
to
accelerate
the
closure
of
divergent
paths
to
development:
the
first
based
on
market
construction
from
the
early
1990s,
a
second
based
on
reconfiguring
institutional
arrangements
in
CEE
associated
with
European
Union
(EU)
accession,
and
third,
the
neoliberal
promotion
of
competitiveness
after
EU
membership.
The
paper
contends
that
the
EBRDs
strategies
for
neoliberalisation
have
shifted
again
in
response
to
the
current
crisis,
and
thus
a
fourth
wave
of
neoliberalisation
is
emerging
following
the
North
Atlantic
financial
crisis.
This
latest
wave
of
neoliberalisation
evident
in
recent
EBRD
material
prompts
CEE
to
discover
sources
of
growth
less
sensitive
to
changes
in
the
external
environment:
households
and
individuals.
Jonathan
Short
Simon
which
domestic
opposition
is
growing
have
prompted
Russias
actions,
first
in
Georgia,
and
now
in
Ukraine.
John
Smith
Resource
extraction,
production
outsourcing
and
the
new
divisions
of
labour
in
the
global
economy
This
paper
locates
resource-extraction
within
the
broader
context
of
proliferating
global
value
chains,
in
which
lead
firms
(MNCs
headquartered
in
imperialist
countries)
outsource
production
to
low-wage
countries,
thereby
siphoning
surplus
value
extracted
from
super-
exploited
workers
which
reappears
as
value-added
arising
from
their
own
branding
and
retailing
activities.
It
examines
why
the
increasingly
favoured
arms
length
relationships
seen
in
production,
i.e.
the
processing
of
raw
materials
into
finished
goods,
are
not
seen
in
the
extractive
industries,
where
giant
mining
firms
strive
to
maintain
ownership
and
control
over
natural
resources
and
their
extraction.
It
argues
that
resource-extraction
and
production
outsourcing
are
two
essentially
complementary
forms
of
imperialist
exploitation,
a
division
of
labour
between
different
f(r)actions
of
imperialist
capital
whose
profits
increasingly
depend
upon
the
suppression
of
working
people
and
the
subversion
of
national
sovereignty
in
so-called
emerging
nations.
Murray
Smith
The
ability
of
global
capitalism
to
weather
so
well
the
financial
crisis
and
great
recession
of
2007-09,
and
the
palpable
inability
of
socialists
to
extend
their
influence
significantly
in
the
face
of
so
severe
a
systemic
crisis,
has
been
viewed
as
an
enigma
by
many
on
the
left.
An
adequate
explanation
of
this
'enigma'
calls
for
an
exploration
of
three
inter-related
issues:
the
long-standing
and
deep-going
damage
done
by
Stalinism
to
the
Marxist-socialist
project;
the
persistent
hegemony
of
'utopian-reformist'
conceptions
on
the
contemporary
radical
left;
and
the
acute
crisis
of
leadership
that
continues
to
afflict
the
international
working
class.
This
paper
explores
these
issues
by
summarizing
and
extending
some
of
the
principal
arguments
presented
in
'Marxist
Phoenix'
(2014)
by
Murray
E.G.
Smith,
concerning
the
theoretical
and
practical
prerequisites
for
the
revival
of
'scientific
socialism'
as
the
indispensable
foundation
of
an
insurgent
21st-century
socialist
movement.
Stuart
Smithers
Mimesis
and
Magic:
Breaking
the
Spell
of
Self-Forgetfulness
and
Reification
in
Adorno
and
Benjamin
"In
his
1938
letter
to
Benjamin,
Adorno
laments
the
omission
of
theory
in
certain
aspects
of
the
Arcades
study,
suggesting:
If
one
wished
to
put
it
very
drastically,
one
could
say
that
your
study
is
located
at
the
crossroads
of
magic
and
positivism.
That
spot
is
bewitched.
Only
theory
could
break
the
spell
Adornos
warning
reminds
us
not
only
of
the
centrality
of
the
commodity
form
in
Marxist
thought,
but
also
the
critique
of
capital
as
a
medium
and
matrix
for
the
overlapping,
blending,
intersecting,
mystifying
and
often
bewitching
forms
of
commodity,
fetishism,
reification,
and
objectification.
While
both
authors
discuss
magic
and
mimesis
with
the
hope
of
liberating
the
modern
subject
from
arrested
development
(especially
in
the
form
of
reified
consciousness),
Adorno
and
Benjamins
maneuvers
demonstrate
very
different
techniques
of
spell-breaking
with
regard
to
self-reification.
The
primary
concerns
of
this
paper
are
twofold:
First,
to
locate
and
elaborate
the
problem
and
significance
of
the
self-reification
of
consciousness
as
central
not
only
to
Frankfurt
School
thinkers,
but
to
Marxist
thought
more
generally.
Self-reification
presents
itself
as
a
form
of
ego-enclosure
that
is
unconsciously
dependent
on
psychological
structure
and
tendencies
as
well
as
social
structures.
This
concept
of
self-reification
encourages
us
to
question
the
ways
in
which
the
commodity
form
accelerates
and
disguises
the
reality
of
self-forgetting,
which
allows
capital
to
solidify
its
victories
in
the
reified
self.
The
second
concern
of
the
paper
is
to
begin
a
study
of
the
concepts
of
magic
and
mimesis
as
tropes
employed
by
Benjamin
and
Adorno
in
discussions
of
self-forgetfulness
related
to
commodity,
fetish,
and
reification.
The
paper
argues
that
discussions,
images,
and
theories
of
magic
represent
a
special
intersection
for
the
critique
of
the
ideas
of
identity,
naming,
thinking,
and
reification
in
Adorno
and
Benjamin,
a
bewitched
spot
in
which
capitals
mystifying
and
alluring
processes
of
commodity
structure
and
self-reification
are
revealed
and
therefore
made
potentially
more
vulnerable
to
spell-breaking."
Panagiotis
Sotiris
Encounter,
inexistence
of
the
origin
and
virtual
forms
of
communism:
Althussers
new
materialist
practice
of
philosophy
in
the
1970s
The
recent
publication
of
Althussers
1972
course
on
Rousseau
and
of
his
important
manuscript,
from
the
second
half
of
the
1970s,
on
the
Initiation
to
Philosophy
for
non-
philosophers,
along
with
other
texts
already
published
from
the
same
period,
such
as
Machiavelli
and
Us,
the
Transformation
of
Philosophy
lecture
and
the
texts
on
the
crisis
of
Marxism,
offers
us
the
possibility
to
retrace
Althussers
confrontation
with
the
question
of
a
new
and
highly
original
materialist
practice
of
philosophy
as
a
parallel
process
with
this
attempt
towards
a
left
critique
of
the
many
shortcomings
of
the
communist
movement
in
a
period
of
strategic
crisis.
These
texts
help
us
realize
that
the
materialism
of
the
encounter
should
not
associated
only
with
the
posthumously
published
texts
from
the
1980s,
but,
in
Souvlis
propose
a
historical
understanding
which
conceives
the
past
and
present
as
an
organic
totality
adopting
the
presupposition
that
every
history
is
necessarily
contemporary
history.
Vicky
Sparrow
"The
poet
under
capital
has
been
given
a
heavy
task.
Since
Walter
Benjamins
conceptualisation
of
Baudelaire
as
the
poetic
subject
compelled
to
give
voice
to
the
commodity,
and
T.
W.
Adornos
declamation
of
poetrys
death
in
the
wake
of
European
fascism,
the
poetic
producer
contends
with
the
forms
compromised
position.
When
it
is
written
through
the
colonised
minds
and
subject(ivitie)s
of
late
global
capitalism,
poetry
can
do
nothing
but
share
its
linguistic
material
with
capital.
Furthermore,
poetic
language
might
unavoidably
through
techniques
which
raise
the
value
of
its
composite
language
exploit
a
kind
of
inflated
linguistic
economy.
Does
this
methodological
sympathy
with
capitalist
logic
make
poetry
predisposed
to
complicity
with
capitalist
modes
of
domination?
Anyone
reading
mainstream
poetry
now
might
feel
constrained
to
answer
yes.
This
paper
focuses
on
one
writer:
Anna
Mendelssohn,
the
poet
and
activist
made
(in)famous
through
her
1972
conviction
for
conspiracy
to
cause
explosions,
along
with
other
members
of
the
British
anti-capitalist
activist
group,
the
Angry
Brigade.
Mendelssohns
poetic
output
finds
innumerable
ways
of
resisting
the
economico-linguistic
structures
of
meaning
and
domination
she
perceived,
and
attacked,
in
concrete
social
relations
under
capitalism.
The
paper
considers
how
poetry
can
endure
its
commodification;
and
how
the
commodity
form
endures
in
language."
Ross
Speer
make
explicit
the
philosophical
conception
underlying
this
aleatory
materialism
and
it
is
argued
here
that
Gramsci
acts
as
an
important
predecessor
to
the
development
of
this
idea."
Annie
Spencer
mode
of
production,
which
is
inherently
racial
and
gendered
(see
Spencer
2014).
I
posit
that
the
fatal
couplings
of
difference
and
power
that
the
system
requires
(Hall
1992,
in
Gilmore
2008;
see
also
Smith
1984),
always
entail
social
and
geographical
dislocation
(Spencer
2014,
Alexander
2012)
a
process
that
is
always
unfolding,
transmuting,
as
capital
reconfigures
to
subvert
barriers
and
maximize
accumulation
and
one
in
which
the
state
plays
a
central,
but
not
singular,
role.
Jonathan
Stafford
Circulation,
Repetition
and
Globalised
Patterns
of
Accumulation:
the
temporal
logic
of
steam
power
in
nineteenth
century
imperialist
shipping.
In
Volume
III
of
Capital,
Marx
reproduces
a
lengthy
quotation
from
the
Manchester
Guardian
concerning
a
practice
of
fabricating
fictitious
capital
whereby
the
shipping
documents
of
commodities
travelling
from
India
by
sailing
ship
around
the
Cape
of
Good
Hope
to
England
were
sent
rapidly
by
steamships
via
Egypt.
Preceding
the
goods
by
several
months,
the
documents
could
be
redeemed
by
the
company
through
pawning
the
bankers
drafts
with
a
London
bank
well
in
advance
of
actually
having
to
pay
for
the
merchandise.
What
is
significant
for
Marx
in
this
passage
is
that
the
utilisation
of
steamships
marked
the
simultaneous
existence
of
two
distinct
structures
of
temporality
in
the
context
of
the
capitalist
means
of
production.
Steamship
time
as
the
temporality
of
industrial
capital
is
rendered
in
opposition
to
that
of
sail
the
circulatory
logic
of
merchant
capital.
This
historical
departure
marks
the
inception
of
a
new
circulatory
regime,
governed
by
its
own
temporal
structure,
which
runs
in
parallel
with
the
existing
system,
discontinuously
simultaneous
but
nonsynchronous.
This
paper
sets
out
to
challenge
the
received
logic
of
temporal
acceleration
characteristic
of
the
narrative
of
capitalist
spatial
domination
with
a
study
of
new
temporal
modalities
of
accumulation
on
a
global
scale
which
exhibit
circulatory
patterns
distinguished
rather
by
their
predictability
and
repetition.
Luke
Stobart
The
politics
and
'anti-politics'
of
Podemos
Contrary
to
economistic
categorisations
made
of
the
15-M
(Indignados)
movement
in
the
Spanish
State,
this
movement
was
primarily
a
rebellion
against
really
existing
politics
and
an
example
of
the
new
anti-politics
identified
by
Humphrys
and
Tietze.
Due
to
the
historic
dimensions
of
the
15-M,
its
consciousness-raising,
and
the
reconfiguration
of
social
struggle
it
inspired,
the
15-M
has
fed
a
progressively-inclined
organic
crisis
of
the
state.
More
recently,
anti-politics
has
confirmed
its
transformative
potential
through
the
electoral
advance
of
Podemos
a
radical
organisation
mainly
consisting
of
participants
from
the
new
social
movements.
In
a
context
of
political
disaffection
and
institutional
blockage,
Podemos
systematic
antagonism
towards
the
political
caste
enabled
it
to
win
8%
of
the
vote
in
its
first
elections,
and
to
dominate
subsequent
debate
in
the
mainstream.
This
militancy
and
Podemos
new
way
of
doing
politics
(mass
assemblies,
open
primaries
and
rejection
of
closed-door
negotiations)
are
unsettling
and
destabilising
the
traditional
Left,
and
strengthening
calls
for
a
change
in
the
institutional
framework
after
the
abdication
of
King
Juan
Carlos.
Even
when
taking
local
factors
into
account,
the
surprise
impact
of
Podemos
suggests
that
radical
anti-politics
provides
a
strong
basis
for
progressive
projects
within
the
contemporary
international
context.
Robert Stolz
From
Imperial
Agriculture
to
Income
Doubling:
The
Postwar
Japanese
Agrarian
Crisis
Using
Uno
Kozo
and
Tosaka
Juns
understanding
of
a
free-floating
feudalitya
feudal
essence
as
opposed
to
a
feudal
systemthis
paper
will
look
at
Occupation
Japans
(1945-
52)
agricultural
policies
as
a
way
to
explore
how
the
loss
of
Japans
empire
forced
a
rethinking
of
not
only
landholding
and
taxation
policies,
but
also
a
significant
recycling
of
imperial
ideologies
that
had
a
profound
influence
on
the
structure
and
politics
of
the
postwar
Japanese
state.
As
a
way
to
get
at
how
contemporaries
viewed
the
nature
of
the
global
crisis
of
1931-45
and
what
they
considered
necessary
for
a
Japan
without
an
empire,
I
will
use
the
records
and
materials
submitted
to
SCAP
for
the
1950
rehabilitation
hearing
of
the
purged
head
of
Yukijirushi
(Snow
Brand
Dairy),
Kurosawa
Toriz
(1885-1982).
Snow
Brand,
or
its
wartime
incarnation,
Hokkaido
kn
ksha,
is
well
placed
for
this
discussion:
Originally
a
producers
cooperative
conceived
as
a
solution
to
the
vulnerability
of
farmers
to
market
and
political
forces
in
the
Ashio
Copper
Mine
Pollution
Incident,
it
later
became
a
key
part
of
imperial
agricultural
policy
when
Kurosawa
was
appointed
to
the
Imperial
Rule
Assistance
Association
(IRAA).
Though
this
resulted
in
an
initial
breakup
and
purge
by
SCAP,
both
Kurosawa
and
Snow
Brand
had
reformed
on
the
eve
of
the
Ikeda
cabinets
famous
high-growth
and
income
doubling
plans
of
1960.
Ted
Stolze
Stoyanova
The
construction
of
the
idea
of
civil
society
and
its
role
in
the
neoliberal
transformation
in
Bulgaria
This
paper
is
an
attempt
to
contribute
to
research
on
the
postcommunist
transitions
from
socialism
to
capitalism,
and
particularly
on
the
role
of
discourse
and
ideology
in
these.
It
focuses
specifically
on
the
case
of
the
discursive
construction
and
construal
of
the
idea
of
civil
society
within
the
neoliberal
agenda
of
the
transformation
in
Bulgaria.
Throughout
the
course
of
the
Bulgarian
transition,
the
concept
of
civil
society
was
predominantly
borrowed
as
an
abstract
but
ready-made
yardstick
by
which
to
judge
whether
the
country
was
successfully
transitioning
to
a
liberal
democratic
system,
and
the
term
came
to
dominate
political
discourses.
For
the
purposes
of
this
paper,
I
take
four
reports
published
by
NGOs
in
the
period
between
1998
and
2007,
whereby
the
state
of
civil
society
is
evaluated
and
policy
recommendations
made.
I
adopt
the
methodology
of
critical
discourse
analysis
(Fairclough
1995)
in
reading
these
reports,
focusing
on
their
language
as
1)
text,
2)
as
discursive
practice,
involving
the
production
and
interpretation
of
text,
and
as
3)
social
practice.
I
also
draw
on
theories
of
social
imaginaries
(Taylor
2004)
and
of
utopias
and
ideologies
(Mannheim
1936/1976;
Bloch
1954/1986)
to
acquire
the
analytical
lens
to
investigate
questions
of
structure,
agency
and
culture
in
the
discursive
justification
of
the
specific
(neoliberal)
form
of
civil
society
which
was
promoted
in
the
Bulgarian
postcommunist
transformation.
Alen
Suceska
Surin
In
this
paper
I
examine
the
claim,
advanced
in
many
quarters
and
in
several
versions,
that
the
most
recent
forms
of
capitalist
development
have
effectively
discredited
theories
of
uneven
or
dependent
development,
and
this
because
these
theories
hinge
crucially
on
conceptions
that
are
no
longer
plausible
theoretically
and
which
have
been
sidelined
by
recent
historical
events.
Thus,
the
ending
of
the
post-war
'Golden
Age'
ensued
in
a
radical
restructuring
of
world
capitalism
that
saw
the
emergence
of
new
regimes
of
international
competition.
These
regimes,
it
is
claimed,
have
allowed
the
East
Asian
countries
to
emerge
as
full-fledged
industrial
powers
(contra
dependency
theory);
and,
moreover,
the
emergence
of
financialization
has
up-ended
the
old
notion
that
development
has
to
be
predicated
on
industrialization
(again
contra
dependency
theory).
Against
these
views,
Ill
argue
that
dependency
or
uneven
development
theory
can
be
expanded
to
take
into
account
comprador
industrialization
and
financialization.
Dan
Swain
"In
this
paper
I
offer
an
interpretation
of
Lukcs
concept
of
the
actuality
of
revolution
as
a
practical
guide
to
action
which
is
both
consistent
with
and
informed
by
Marxs
commitment
to
proletarian
self-emancipation.
This
concept
has
been
subjected
to
varied
interpretations.
On
the
one
hand,
it
appears
to
refer
to
the
fact
that
revolution
is
historically
possible,
and
recognised
to
be
so.
On
the
other,
it
suggests
a
certain
revolutionary
approach
or
method,
in
which
the
problems
of
everyday
life
are
recognised
as
problems
of
the
revolution.
My
interpretation
stresses
the
latter
of
these
options,
arguing
that
it
is
best
understood
as
a
guide
to
revolutionary
practice,
which
stresses
at
every
stage
practical
questions
of
working
class
empowerment
and
self-emancipation.
To
this
extent
I
agree
with
arguments
from
Paul
LeBlanc
and
Jodi
Dean
that
Lukcs
ideas
are
of
continuing
relevance
for
anyone
committed
to
radical
political
change,
and
neednt
be
understood
as
licensing
an
elitist
approach.
However,
partially
against
Dean
and
LeBlanc,
I
argue
that
there
is
an
elitist
strain
in
Lukcs
which
must
be
properly
disentangled,
and
that
this
rests
on
his
tendency
to
conflate
Marxist
theory
with
revolutionary
class
consciousness.
Although
avoiding
this
conflation
unravels
some
of
Lukcs
neat
dialectical
solutions,
it
does
not
completely
devalue
his
approach
to
revolutionary
practice.
Krystian
Szadkowski
Political
and
economic
consequences
of
the
first
capitalist
transformation
of
the
Polish
higher
education
system
(1990-2008)
"Until
1989
the
socialist
higher
education
system
in
Poland
was
elite-formation
oriented,
with
the
average
participation
rate
of
15%
of
the
youth
population
aged
between
19-24
and
around
400
000
students.
The
first
capitalist
transformation
of
the
sector,
started
in
1990,
brought
enormous
change.
Rapid
expansion
of
the
enrolments,
partially
achieved
through
creation
of
the
large
private
sector
and
internal
privatization
of
the
public
universities,
reached
its
peak
in
2005
with
nearly
2
million
students
enrolled
and
participation
rate
over
50%.
The
specificity
of
this
universalization
of
access
at
the
post-socialist
peripheries
remains
obscure.
Polish
higher
education
system,
despite
size
and
openness,
became
an
accelerator
of
class
division
and
a
factory
of
precarious
workers.
The
article
reads
this
process,
on
the
one
side,
through
the
lenses
of
the
Marxist
analysis
of
a
higher
education
systems'
dynamics
(using
concepts
of
formal
subsumption
and
ideal
form
of
formal
subsumption),
on
the
other,
with
the
focus
on
the
functionality
of
the
system
itself
for
the
expanding
capitalist
labour
market
(absorption
of
the
potentially
unemployed,
reduction
of
the
costs
of
labour
power,
precarization,
substitution
of
the
welfare
provision
under
the
neoliberal
onslaught).
The
final
part
shows
how
this
shift
from
elite
to
universal
access,
specific
for
the
systems
of
some
post-socialist
countries
in
the
region,
not
only
supported
the
expansion
of
capitalism
but
also
formed
one
of
the
most
important
conditions
of
its
survival.
Sebastiano
Taccola
Marx and the Ancients. The Italian debate during the Seventies.
"The
debate
on
the
social
and
economic
life
in
the
ancient
world
has
often
interested
Marx
scholars.
Since
the
1950s,
many
economic
anthropologists,
under
the
influence
of
the
category
of
embedded
economy
proposed
by
Karl
Polanyi,
have
pointed
out
that
the
historical
materialism
categories
are
not
sufficient
to
understand
ancient
societies.
Though
Marx
didnt
leave
us
a
systematic
exposition
of
the
ancient
modes
of
production,
nevertheless,
he
was
really
interested
to
this
kind
of
problem.
It
is
sufficient
to
read
the
parts
dedicated
to
the
pre-capitalistic
modes
of
production
that
can
be
found,
not
only
in
the
Grundrisse
and
in
the
Enthnological
Notebooks,
but
also
some
in
the
Capital.
In
my
presentation
I
will
focus
on
the
Italian
debate
on
Marx
and
the
Ancients
during
the
Seventies.
The
contributions
given
by
Marxian-oriented
Italian
philologists,
archaeologists
and
philosophers,
far
beyond
the
twentieth
century
fundamental
contrast
between
primitivism
and
modernism,
represented
a
deep
critique
of
the
economic
anthropology
and
gave
new
life
to
historical
materialism.
Following
this
path,
it
is
possible
to
develop,
on
the
one
hand,
a
radical
critique
of
the
embedded
economy
model,
and,
on
the
other
hand,
to
overcome
the
hypostasis
and
the
naturalizations
of
mainstream
historiography.
According
to
me,
this
could
be
the
key
for
us
to
build
up
a
rich
comparison
between
the
pre-capitalistic
and
the
capitalistic
modes
of
production,
and
to
actualize
Marxs
critique
of
the
political
economy
method,
as
exposed
by
him
in
the
Introduction
to
Grundrisse.
Daniel
Tanuro
Climate
change:
the
worker's
movement
and
the
necessary
reduction
of
the
material
production
The
2C
Carbon
budget
implies
for
developed
capitalist
countries
to
reduce
their
GHG
emissions
each
year
by
at
least
11%,
from
now
to
2050.
Such
a
reduction
is
a
huge
challenge,
especially
if
it
goes
hand
in
hand
with
a
phasing
out
of
the
nuclear
energy
(which
is
absolutely
necessary,
for
obvious
reasons).
The
building
of
a
new
energy
system,
based
on
renewables,
will
need
great
amounts
of
fossil
fuels
causing
additional
emissions
of
CO2,
compared
to
the
BUA
scenario.
These
emissions
will
have
to
be
compensated
by
drastic
cuts
in
the
primary
energy
consumption.
The
unescapable
conclusion
is
that
the
success
of
the
energy
transition
depends
on
a
serious
reduction
in
the
material
production
and
transportation.
As
a
consequence,
it
is
not
enough
to
ask
for
more
green
jobs.
Neither
a
carbon
tax
will
be
an
instrument
to
cope
with
the
urgency
of
the
situation.
To
conciliate
the
quick
reduction
in
the
material
production
with
the
worker's
demands
for
jobs
and
against
austerity
will
be
possible
only
within
the
framework
of
a
very
radical
and
global
anticapitalist
policy,
including
a.o.:
the
planification
of
the
transition,
at
least
at
the
European
level,
the
nationalisation
of
energy
and
finance,
the
closure
of
harmful
or
unnecessary
industries,
the
worker's
control
on
the
quality
of
their
production,
new
jobs
in
new
public
services
in
the
fields
of
dwelling
insulation,
the
location
of
the
food
production,
land
management
and
care
of
the
environment,
and
a
drastic
reduction
in
the
working
time
-
without
wage
loss-
as
a
qualitative
compensation
for
certain
quantitative
changes
in
the
way
of
life.
There's
no
shortcut,
no
place
for
a
class
collaboration
policy.
The
point
of
non
return
has
been
passed
in
the
melting
of
the
ice
cap
of
Western
Antarctica.
Radical
left
should
unify
its
forces
in
order
to
sound
the
tocsin
and
elaborate
an
ecosocialist
plan
in
order
to
limit
the
catastrophy.
Zehra
Tasdemir
Yasin
Tateishi
"Urban
areas
are
the
most
significant
contributors
to
todays
global
warming.
International
Energy
Agency
estimates
that
approximately
70
%
of
CO2
emissions
stem
from
urban
activities.
At
the
same
time,
as
David
Harvey
argues,
urbanization
is
a
primary
way
of
absorbing
over-accumulated
capital,
which
is
imperative
for
the
survival
of
capitalism.
Can
we
find
any
theoretical
connection
between
fossil
fuel
consumption
within
the
city
and
capitalist
urbanization?
I
shall
try
to
show
that
todays
global
capitalism
and
the
mass
consumption
of
fossil
fuels
are
indeed
closely
linked.
This
shall
be
done
by
showing
not
only
that
capitalist
production
is
fossil-fuel-dependent
(FFD)
but
also
that
spatio-temporal
fixes
for
crises
of
over
accumulation,
as
identified
by
David
Harvey
formulated,
is
FFD
as
well.
The
sequence
might
be
sketched
in
the
following
way:
{[CP
+
FF
=
AC]
[OAC]
[STF(U)
+
FF]}
: Capitalistic Production
FF
: Fossil Fuels
AC
: Accumulation
OAC
: Over Accumulation
Thompson
Alan
Thornett
is
a
writer
and
campaigner
on
ecological
issues.
He
is
active
in
the
Campaign
Against
Climate
Change
and
its
trade
union
committee.
He
is
a
member
of
the
editorial
boards
of
Socialist
Resistance
and
of
International
Viewpoint.
His
book
Militant
Years
is
an
account
of
his
time
as
a
trade
union
leader
in
the
car
industry.
This
paper
will
look
at
what
is
arguably
the
biggest
single
impact
on
the
biosphere
of
the
planet
by
climate
change
and
the
ecological
crisis:
crisis
the
crisis
of
biodiversity.
That
is
best
described
as
the
sixth
great
species
extinction
to
hit
the
planet
in
its
450
million
year
history.
That
we
are
therefore
living
through
a
new
geological
epoch:
the
epoch
of
the
Anthropoceneas
argued
by
ecologist
Eugene
Stoermer
and
Nobel
Prize-winning
atmospheric
chemist
Paul
Cruzen.
That
whilst
previous
mass
extinctions
were
the
result
of
naturally
occurring
phenomena
this
one
is
a
result
of
the
unconscious
activities
of
the
most,
successful,
and
rapacious
species
the
planet
has
producedmodern
human
beings.
The
paper
will
note
that:
Between
40
and
50
percent
of
species
on
the
planet
could
be
extinct
by
the
mid-
century
In the tropics around 5,000 species are being lost each year.
The
extinction
rate
among
amphibians
is
a
mind-boggling
45,000
times
higher
than
the
background
rate
that
existed
for
millions
of
years.
A
quarter
of
all
mammal
species
are
at
risk
(the
background
rate
for
mammals
is
one
in
700
years).
The
acidification
of
the
oceans
means
that
coral
reefs
are
dying
off
as
are
organisms
that
rely
on
calcification
for
their
shell
structure.
The
paper
will
discuss
the
necessary
steps
to
be
taken
to
mitigate
this
situation
and
to
seek
to
reverse
it
and
it
will
argue
that
extinction
rates
of
this
kind
puts
at
risk
all
species
on
the
planet
including,
eventually,
our
own."
Tania
Toffanin
Feminism
in
Italy
after
the
Seventies:
from
the
struggle
for
the
wages
for
housework
to
the
ideology
of
equal
opportunities
"In
Italy
during
the
Seventies
there
were
many
feminist
movements
claiming
for
the
refusal
of
the
androcentrism
but
also
the
idea
of
equality,
considered
as
an
empty
box
useful
for
neglecting
womens
condition.
But
after
the
legalisation
of
divorce
and
abortion
and
the
formal
recognition
of
the
women
question
the
feminist
movements
collapsed.
The
season
of
terrorism
played
a
crucial
role
in
Italy
to
order
the
political
discourse:
after
that
season
the
social
conflict
was
considered
as
mere
violence,
also
for
the
normalisation
done
by
the
Italian
Communist
Party
that
needed
to
be
legitimated
as
a
democratic
party.
In
the
Eighties
while
the
Italian
communist
party
and
left
unionism
changed
their
aims
as
a
consequence
of
the
political
exchange
that
allowed
them
to
keep
their
structure
with
the
assurance
to
decline
any
revolutionary
perspectives,
other
more
radical
left
movements
disappeared.
These
processes
of
both
institutionalization
and
weakening
concerned
also
feminism.
Both
the
concept
of
equality
and
difference
have
mystified
that
also
for
women
the
standard,
the
unit
of
measure
has
become
men
and
their
behaviour
in
public
and
private
sphere.
This
standard
also
changes
on
the
basis
of
economic
and
social
contingencies
but
it
continues
to
dominate.
And
what
about
the
gender
dimension?
It
has
been
formally
but
elusively
solved
by
the
ideology
of
equal
opportunities
while
the
intersection
between
gender
and
class
has
been
totally
silenced.
So
why
do
we
take
for
granted
or
imagine
that
feminism
would
be
fully
impermeable
to
capitalism?
I
think
that
Marxism
has
been
given
more
blame
than
it
had
in
relation
to
the
concealment
of
the
women
question.
Considering
what
happened
in
Italy,
as
working
class
movements
hidden
the
gender,
the
feminist
movements
dismissed
the
class
and
both
feminism
and
Marxism
have
lost
a
crucial
battle.
As
already
highlighted
in
1971
by
Mariarosa
Dalla
Costa,
the
struggle
of
women
had
to
fight
patriarchy
and
act
as
a
catalyst
for
other
subjectivities
dominated
by
the
patriarchal
system.
While
feminist
movements
have
got
lost
in
the
creation
of
modern
gynaecea,
reduced
within
the
logic
of
equal
opportunities,
the
working
class
has
dismissed
its
identity.
The
result
has
been
again
the
disavowal
of
the
inseparable
bond
between
productive
and
reproductive
work
in
a
circular
process
that
allows
the
State
to
deny
any
engagement
in
reducing
the
care
burdens
and
the
reproduction
of
the
patriarchal
system
as
well."
Stavros
TOMBAZOS
Samo
Tomsic
Truskolaski
It
has
often
been
noted
that
Adornos
works
abound
with
references
to
golden
calves,
image
bans
and
broken
vessels.
The
religious
provenance
of
Adornos
terminology,
thus,
invites
the
question
what
if
anything
these
references
mean
in
the
wider
context
of
his
work?
Such
an
inquiry
requires
considerable
qualification
for
two
reasons.
Firstly,
Adorno
does
not
engage
at
any
point
in
a
sustained
scholarly
inquiry
into
the
nature
of
God
that
might
be
called
properly
theological
in
an
academic
sense.
(Certainly,
Adorno
had
no
formal
knowledge
of,
either,
the
Jewish
or
Christian
traditions
from
which
he
draws.)
Secondly,
Adorno
explicitly
accepts
the
verdicts
of
his
intellectual
progenitors
Friedrich
Nietzsche
and
Karl
Marx,
arguing
that
positive
religion
has
lost
its
()
validity;
that
traditional
theology
is
not
restorable.
Accordingly,
his
many
invocations
of
biblical
motifs
are,
indeed,
somewhat
surprising,
begging
the
question
how
they
are
to
be
seen
as
anything
more
than
incidental
metaphors.
My
wager
is
that
the
answer
to
this
question
lies
in
Adornos
enigmatic
notion
of
an
inverse
theology,
contained
in
a
letter
to
Walter
Benjamin,
dated
17.12.1934.
As
I
argue,
the
point
is
that
inverse
theology
presupposes
a
particular
kind
of
reversal:
on
the
one
hand,
it
concerns
a
standard
enlightenment
narrative
which
teaches
that
the
traditional
authority
of
a
monotheistic
world-view
wanes
with
the
advancement
of
the
natural
sciences;
on
the
other
hand,
it
concerns
the
view
that
the
ostensibly
modern
phenomenon
of
capitalism
is
itself
imbued
with
religious
characteristics.
Against
the
backdrop
of
recent
work
on
this
question
(Hamacher,
Santner,
Khatib)
I
ask
whether
it
is
conceivable
that
Adorno,
too,
turns
the
displaced
terms
of
theology
against
the
capitalism
cult
religion."
Sofia
Tsadari
he
50
shades
of
red:
perspectives
of
the
left
in
conflict
during
the
memorandum
era
in
Greece
"The
introduction
of
Greece
to
the
""support""
mechanism
in
the
spring
of
2010
marks
a
historic
milestone.
The
memorandum
era
is
a
synonymous
of
flagrant
oppression
of
the
working
majority
and
the
youth.
At
the
same
time
it
is
a
period
of
extremely
massive
and
important
social
struggles.
Unprecedented
worker's
strikes
and
the
square
movement
constitute
key
moments,
in
the
development
of
which
left-wing
organisations
played
a
leading
role.
So
it
is
important
to
record
what
they
were
advocating,
and
it
is
for
sure
that
there
were
differences.
In
this
viewpoint
""red
had
many
shades"".
In
this
paper
we
will
examine
the
different
assessments
and
political
responses
of
the
left
on
some
issues
that
we
consider
fundamental.
The
background
of
different
political
answers
and
slogans
is
the
basic
assessments
concerning
a)
the
standing
of
Greece
and
its
economy
at
international
level
and
b)
the
character
of
this
new
period
that
follows
the
entry
into
the
memorandum
era.
Is
Greece
a
dependent
territory
and
what
is
the
content
of
the
term
dependency?
Do
we
experience
a
state
of
occupation
similar
to
the
1940s?
(critical
approach
to
the
theories
of
dependence
/
new
occupation).
What
is
the
role
and
the
conditions
of
the
Greek
participation
in
EU?
(critique
of
the
neoliberal
view
underlining
the
facts
of
uneven
development
and
the
exploitative
character
of
the
union,
critical
approach
to
the
possibility
of
a
social
European
Union).
And,
ultimately,
how
is
the
answer
to
these
questions
related
to
the
political
platforms
of
the
left?
(upgrading
the
national
or
class
nature
of
the
struggle).
There
is
an
extensive
discussion
concerning
the
fragmentation
of
the
left
wing.
However,
the
demand
for
unity
stumbles
over
rocks
in
the
darkness.
Which
are
the
rocks?
On
the
basis
of
different
approaches,
the
simple
invocation
of
unity
is
not
sufficient
when
strategic
matters
are
existent.
Capitalism
survives
for
one
more
reason,
because
of
the
strategic
failure
of
the
counter-
power
that
could
overthrow
it."
George
Tsogas
The
Commodity
Form
in
Cognitive
Biocapitalism
-
Alive
and
Excessive
Through
the
thought
of
Sohn-Rethel
we
can
see
how
his
daring
suggestions
on
the
ontological
unity
of
consciousness
and
commodity
exchange
can
have
a
renewed
relevance
for
the
era
of
cognitive
biocapitalism.
He
can
help
us
see
under
new
light
and
explain
how
commodities
in
cognitive
biocapitalism
appeal
and
appear
to
us.
In
this
paper,
we
explain
how
the
feelings
and
emotions
of
the
immaterial
labour
of
thousands
of
people
is
embedded
in
any
commodity,
even
in
such
a
simple
thing
as
a
t-shirt
or
a
pair
of
cool
trainers.
But,
cognitive
biocapitalism
creates
no
simple
commodities.
Each
and
every
one
becomes
the
depository
of
a
vast
array
of
cognition
and
states
of
consciousness;
not
only
of
the
mechanical
knowledge,
the
data
of
the
manufacturing
and
logistic
systems,
but
also
of
the
sentiments,
sensations
and
ways
of
life
of
workers
along
the
value
chain.
All
these
are
amassed
into
a
logo,
a
brand
name,
a
symbol
of
the
commodity,
and
through
it
are
channelled
back
to
us.
They
are
our
own
knowledge
and
thoughts
that
we
project
into
the
commodity
and
it,
in
turn,
sends
them
back
to
us.
They
match
perfectly
our
own
thoughts,
feelings,
and
expectations
of
life,
because
they
are
parts
of
us;
they
are
us.
In
that
way,
it
makes
perfect
sense
that
in
cognitive
biocapitalism
(as
business
practitioners
understand
very
well)
commodities
may
only
come
to
life
(often
through
the
blood
and
tears
of
exploited
workers)
when
and
because
of
a
particular
outlet
for
their
desire,
adoration
and
consumption
has
arose
and
calls
for
them
to
come
into
existence.
We
our
consciousness
are
that
outlet.
Anticipated
consumption
(that
is
our
cognitive
states,
formed
as
they
are
by
capitalist
commodity
exchange)
dictate
what,
how,
where,
when,
how
much,
by
whom,
etc.
will
be
produced.
Production
matches
the
demands
that
consumption
puts
upon
it.
Knowledge
is
not
outside
and
unaffected
by
the
production
Representative Democracy and its Discontents: the Rise of the Rhyzomatic Party Form
"November
2014
will
mark
the
25th
anniversary
of
the
transition
to
democracy
in
Bulgaria.
Far
from
an
occasion
for
jubilation
over
the
relatively
unproblematic
implementation
of
liberal
political
and
economic
reforms,
the
past
year's
popular
mobilizations
and
dismal
performance
of
electoral
politics
have
alarmed
liberal
intellectuals.
In
an
idealist
fashion,
they
are
(mistakenly)
looking
for
the
causes
of
the
crisis
of
representation
the
rise
of
populism
rather
than
in
the
glitches
in
capital
accumulation,
austerity
and
the
incapacity
of
the
neoliberal
ideological
straitjacket
on
democracy
to
offer
change
of
politics,
rather
than
of
politicians.
Since
1989
Bulgarians
have
not
re-elected
any
incumbent
government;
Bulgaria,
therefore,
is
a
country
where
electoral
volatility
makes
it
easy
for
new
parties
to
displace
old
ones,
only
to
be
cast
away
shortly
after.
In
that
respect,
the
2013
mass
protests
in
Bulgaria
were
not
a
disillusionment
with
some
imperfections
of
liberal
democracy
(e.g.
corruption),
but
directed
against
representative
politics
as
such.
Our
contribution
discusses
the
logic
of
the
crisis
of
representation
plaguing
parties
across
the
political
spectrum.
We
scrutinize
the
effects
of
discursive
strategies
of
political
elites
on
party
ideology,
nomenclature
and
organization,
specifically
the
rise
of
what
we
call
rhyzomatic
party
form."
Lori
Turner
position
within
the
production
process)
led
to
theoretical
reflection
on
the
fate
of
the
independent
producer
regarding
both
his
own
work
and
that
of
a
variety
of
authors
whose
works
he
reviewed
as
a
freelance
writer.
Tom
Twiss
Between
1917
and
his
death
in
1940
Trotsky
advanced
three
diverse
analyses
of
the
problem
of
Soviet
bureaucracy,
each
of
which
provided
a
very
different
account
of
how
bureaucracy
was
promoting
capitalist
restoration
in
the
USSR.
This
paper
will
trace
the
development
of
Trotskys
views
on
these
questionsfrom
his
administrative
focus
the
issue
of
bureaucratic
inefficiency
during
the
civil
war
and
the
early
years
of
NEP;
to
his
initially
impressive
but
increasingly
problematic
characterization
of
the
bureaucratized
state
and
party
apparatuses
as
highly
responsive
to
external,
alien
class
pressures
during
the
years
1923-33;
to
his
final
theory,
most
fully
articulated
in
The
Revolution
Betrayed,
of
the
bureaucracy
as
a
highly
autonomous
social
formation
threatening
to
transform
itself
into
a
new
capitalist
class.
The
paper
will
conclude
with
some
observations
regarding
both
the
significant
weaknesses
and
the
major
strengths
of
Trotskys
final
theory
and
its
predictions
regarding
the
restoration
of
capitalism
in
the
Soviet
Union.
Martin
Upchurch
In
February
2014
a
revolt
broke
out
across
Bosnia
and
Herzegovina.
The
rebellion
included
demands
for
payment
of
delayed
wages,
for
renationalisation
of
privatised
industries,
an
end
to
asset
stripping
by
oligarchs,
and
for
the
reduction
of
salaries
for
local
political
elites.
Plenums,
or
peoples
assemblies,
began
to
reject
the
nationalist
and
ethnic
division
of
the
country.
The
roots
of
nationalism
and
ethnic
division
are
located
in
the
1980s
when
the
economy
of
Yugoslavia
was
in
crisis
and
crippled
with
debt
(Chossudovsky
1997).
Nationalism
was
presented
by
elites
as
a
way
out
of
the
crisis.
After
the
civil
wars
Bosnia
was
left
isolated,
held
together
in
ethnically
based
entities
by
the
1995
Dayton
Accord.
Loans
and
grants
from
international
financial
institutions
and
USAID
liberalised
the
economy
but
created
debt
subservience
and
worker
impoverishment
(Upchurch
2009).
However,
a
class-based
anti-nationalist
mood
has
now
developed.
In
this
paper
we
present
the
story
of
the
protests
but
also
examine
the
politics
of
nationalism
and
anti-nationalism
in
post
socialist
states.
We
assess
the
dynamic
interplay
between
nationalism
and
the
economics
of
market
democracy
with
reference
not
only
to
Bosnia
but
also
the
states
of
the
former
Soviet
Union.
Ugo
Rivetti
Here
I
intend
to
examine
the
work
of
Raymond
Williams
through
a
perspective
still
rather
underexplored
by
the
specialized
literature:
namely,
that
of
a
project
interested
in
the
comprehension
of
modern
society
and
of
the
historical
process
that,
beginning
with
the
Industrial
Revolution,
formed
its
bases,
which,
in
the
English
case,
were,
notably,
industrialism
and
democracy.
In
order
to
accomplish
such
task,
I
intend
to
adress
the
relations
between
the
work
of
Williams
and
those
traditions
which
were
his
greatest
influences:
English
literary
criticism
and
Marxism.
These
theoretical
strands
concern
me
both
because
this
matter
(critique
of
modernity)
takes
a
central
position
in
its
theoretical
schemes,
as
well
as
because
they
rest
in
the
foundation
of
Williams
thought,
as
he
himself
stated
on
different
occasions.
I
intend
to
focus
on
the
genesis
of
the
thought
of
Williams
in
its
interrelationship
with
those
two
traditions,
always
assuming
the
fact
that
(and
this
is
my
first
hypothesis)
the
theory
of
culture
of
Williams
can
only
be
plainly
understood
if
inserted
in
this
major
project
of
critique
of
modernity:
as
Williams
states
in
Culture
and
Society
(1958),
the
task
is
to
think
culture
as
a
concept
which
expresses
the
general
reactions
to
the
social
changes
that
took
place
after
the
Industrial
Revolution
and
which
carried
on
throughout
the
19th
and
20th
centuries.
According
to
this
hypothesis,
the
same
statement
could
be
made
about
the
theories
of
culture
of
Marxism
and
of
English
literary
criticism:
when
dissociated
from
its
social
and
historical
dimensions,
the
notions
of
culture
mobilized
by
these
two
approaches
loose
meaning.
My
second
hypothesis
is
that,
when
the
work
of
Raymond
Williams
is
framed
as
a
critique
of
modernity
nourished
by
these
two
theoretical
influences,
it
is
possible
to
identify
a
path
in
its
development:
in
the
1950s,
a
closer
relation
to
the
English
literary
criticism
tradition
and,
as
a
result,
a
critique
of
modernity
as
industrial
society.
On
the
other
hand,
in
the
1960s
and
1970s
(and,
according
to
my
hypothesis,
notably
in
The
Country
and
The
City),
a
closer
relation
to
Marxism
and,
as
a
result,
a
critique
of
modernity
in
a
Marxist
approach:
for
here
(again,
especially
in
The
Country
and
The
City)
Williams
apprehends
the
critique
of
industrial
society
and
civilization
of
the
English
literary
tradition
as
what
it
really
was,
as
a
critique
of
capitalism.
Jonas
Van
Vossole
Global
Climate
Governance:
a
legitimation
crisis
Capitalism,
power
and
alienation
-
Marxist
and
Polanyian
Perspectives
This
article
frames
the
failure
of
COP19
in
Warsaw,
the
problems
of
the
RIO+20
summit,
the
failure
of
the
Copenhagen
COP15
and
the
problems
of
the
carbon
markets
within
a
broader
legitimacy
crisis
of
Global
Governance,
consequence
of
the
crisis
of
the
global
capitalist
socio-ecology.
Two
mechanisms
give
rise
to
the
loss
of
legitimacy;
unequal
development
and
mercantilization,
or
the
reconfiguration
of
the
power
balance
and
the
destruction
of
social
ties.
As
a
consequence
both
winners
and
losers
contest
the
legitimacy
of
the
institutions
and
mechanisms
that
govern
global
capitalism.
In
this
article,
we
distinguish
Marx-type
of
contestation,
referring
to
emerging
classes/states
and
Polanyi-type
of
contestation,
referring
to
the
victims
of
global
mercantilization.
In
the
case
of
Climate
governance,
these
are
represented
by
the
role
of
the
BRICs
in
climate
negotiations
and
by
the
global
environmental
justice
movement.
Murillo
Roncato
In
june
2013,
during
the
Confederations
Cup,
the
wave
of
mass
protests
that,
since
2008,
affected
many
countries
reached
Brazil.
Initially,
the
demonstrations
were
motivated
by
the
rejection
of
the
public
transportation
fare
increases
in
Sao
Paulo.
After
a
violent
state
repression,
the
marches
have
grown
significantly,
spreading
through
various
Brazilian
cities
and
culminating
with
the
direct
involvement
of
millions
of
people.
The
agenda
of
the
protests
also
grew
and
varied,
encompassing
different
demands
from
different
sectors
of
the
Brazilian
society.
These
events
questioned
an
assumed
socioeconomic
optimism
ongoing
in
the
country
based
on
economic
stability,
unemployment
reduction,
welfare
programs,
easier
credit
access,
etc.
,
highlighting
the
limits
of
the
so-called
new
developmentalism
policies.
In
this
context,
our
aim
in
the
article
is
to
analyse
the
various
positions
of
the
left-wing
movement
(intellectuals,
parties,
social
movements,
etc.)
concerning
the
causes,
developments
and
challenges
brought
forward
by
the
so-called
June
Days.
Some
of
the
questions
that
emerge
from
this
debate
are:
the
current
organizational
issues
of
the
working
class,
new
forms
of
struggle,
the
limits
of
the
Partido
dos
Trabalhadores'
hegemony,
the
concurrent
attempt
of
the
traditional
right
to
capitalize
the
national
instabilities,
the
resurgence
of
the
far-right
movement,
etc.
Matt
Vidal
Sociology
and
the
seven
theses
of
Marxism
-
Or,
sociological
marxism
without
apologies
This
paper
seeks
to
challenge
the
declining
influence
of
classical
marxism
within
sociology,
with
a
particular
thought
not
exclusive
focus
on
American
sociology.
While
many
basic
marxist
analytical
categories
and
insights
have
been
assimilated
into
sociology,
and
marxist
concepts
such
as
class,
hegemony
and
the
labor
process
continue
to
be
used
within
sociology
in
vaguely
marxist
ways,
historical
materialism,
crisis
theory
and
value
theory
have
been
largely
excoriated
from
the
discipline,
at
least
within
the
American
academy.
This
exorcism
has
been
largely
performed
by
two
scholars
who
are
among
the
best
known
American
marxist
sociologists
Michael
Burawoy
and
Erik
Olin
Wright
both
of
whom
have
recently
been
presidents
of
the
American
Sociological
Association.
This
paper
reviews
Burawoy
and
Wrights
explicit
attempts
to
define
marxist
sociology
as
a
combination
of
class
analysis,
labor
process
analysis
and
state
theory,
while
explicitly
rejecting
historical
materialism,
value
theory
and
crisis
theory.
As
such,
Burawoy
and
Wright
have
presented
a
neomarxism
that
is
a
gross
distortion
of
classical
marxism,
one
which
systematically
neglects
the
remarkable
range
of
vibrant
theory
and
research
guided
by
the
core
theses
of
classical
marxism.
In
the
process,
they
have
robbed
sociology
of
the
tools
it
needs
to
explain
core
problems
in
the
contemporary
global
political
economy.
I
will
argue
that
despite
the
modern
political
and
academic
ritual
of
trying
to
find
the
holy
grail
that
invalidates
marxism,
it
is
in
fact
a
living,
vibrant
research
program
consisting
of
at
least
seven
core
theses
on
the
social
construction
of
reality,
historical
materialism,
and
the
contradictory
and
problematic
reproduction
of
capitalism
each
of
which
has
inspired
whole
research
traditions,
making
marxism
the
critical
social
research
program
par
excellence.
These
theses,
which
are
irreducibly-marxist,
continue
to
present
singularly
penetrating
and
analytically
fruitful
insights
into
the
operation
of
capitalist
societies.
Without
some
version
of
the
bulk
of
these
theses,
critical
analysis
of
capitalism
would
be
impossible.
As
such,
they
provide
the
basis
for
a
unified
sociological
framework
that
could
if
it
were
not
so
apologetic
offer
a
real
alternative
to
mainstream
economics.
Satnam
Virdee
to
fully
account
for
the
reproduction
of
racism
in
contemporary
society,
and
understand
why
capitalism
continues
to
survive
into
the
21st
century.
Marina
Vishmidt
&
Melanie
Gilligan
Subjects
of
Crisis
This
paper
is
part
of
a
larger
body
of
ongoing
research
and
publishing
investigating
how
current
shifts
in
the
material
relations
of
money,
commodities,
and
social
abstraction
in
general
shape
contemporary
forms
of
interority.
There
has
been
a
surfeit
of
discussion
of
the
ways
in
which
subjects
are
formed
through
their
social
roles
within
the
relations
of
production,
but
less
has
been
said
about
the
determinate
shaping
of
people
by
abstraction.
This
preliminary
inquiry
into
the
relationship
between
capitalist
abstraction
and
subjectivity
has
two
parts.
In
the
first,
we
will
discuss
some
of
the
most
significant
theoretical
accounts
of
capitalist
abstraction;
in
the
second,
we
will
depart
from
the
history
of
Marxist
thought
towards
the
future
of
capitalism,
tracing
a
few
of
the
abstract
psychologies
on
which
that
future
depends,
and
setting
out
some
reflections
on
how
they
-
and
it
-
might
be
overcome.
If
the
contemporary
subject
is
a
derelict
shell
housing
data
bodies,
social
commodities
and
quantified
selves,
we
need
to
develop
another
materialist
understanding
of
the
subject,
one
which
looks
to
the
collective
production
of
affects
and
rationalities
in
resistance
which
both
exhibit
-
and
forecast
the
surpassing
of
-
the
symptoms
of
our
present.'
Zhaohui
Wang
The
world-systems
theory,
the
US-China
economic
relations,
and
the
global
economic
crisis
Through
the
lens
of
the
world-systems
theory,
I
understand
the
global
economic
crisis
as
a
structural
crisis
within
the
world-economy
and
the
China-US
imbalanced
economic
relations
to
a
large
extent
contribute
to
this
structural
crisis.
The
United
States,
as
the
core
country,
has
the
exorbitant
privilege
of
issuing
the
dollar
used
as
international
reserve
currency
and
a
tendency
to
live
beyond
its
means.
China,
as
the
periphery
country,
has
been
committed
to
export-led
growth
based
on
the
maintenance
of
an
undervalued
exchange
rate.
China
has
intervened
in
the
foreign-exchange
market
to
keep
its
currency
down,
which
results
in
large
accumulation
of
dollar
reserves.
I
will
argue
that
the
US
and
China
actually
form
a
symbiotic
relationship
in
the
capitalist
world-economy.
The
growth
of
Chinas
export
engine
and
the
growth
of
its
dollar
reserves
and
US
debts
are
both
closely
linked
to
the
consumption
spree
in
the
US.
However,
I
would
also
argue
that
the
symbiotic
relationship
between
the
US
and
China
is
not
long-term
sustainable
but
conducive
to
the
structural
crisis
of
the
world-
economy.
The
Triffin
Dilemma
has
pointed
out
the
monetary
system
based
on
the
currency
of
one
country
cannot
sustainably
deliver
both
liquidity
and
confidence.
Finally,
I
will
discuss
Chinas
response
policies
to
the
recent
global
economic
crisis
in
both
domestic
and
international
dimensions,
including
the
fiscal
stimulus
package,
the
economic
restructuring,
and
the
internationalization
of
the
renminbi.
Rikard
Warlenius
A
renewable
transition:
Capitalist
barriers
and
Socialist
enticements
Despite
what
obviously
makes
sense,
and
despite
the
long-term
interests
of
ANY
social
class
or
force,
very
little
is
done
to
avoid
catastrophic
climate
change.
In
order
to
overcome
the
self-destructive
mode
of
current
capitalist
development,
we
need
to
consider
what
aspects
of
renewable
energy
are
so
threatening
to
capital
accumulation
that
even
climate
chaos
is
preferred,
and
how
they
can
be
transcended.
Siobhan
Watters
Food
production
was
one
of
capital's
first
strongholds
(i.e.
through
primitive
accumulation)
and
remains
a
principle
mechanism
by
which
capitalism
survives.
We
often
fail
to
realize
that
the
incarceration
of
food
by
the
commodity
form
degrades
the
food
object
itself
and
guarantees
continued
dependency
on
the
wage.
It
is
the
bodys
frailty,
its
need
for
the
means
of
subsistence,
that
forces
the
subject
to
move
through
capitals
infrastructure
of
self-valorization,
repeatedly
constituting
capital
through
the
extraction
of
her
surplus
labour
and
participation
in
exchange.
And
yet,
food
commodities
are
produced
not
to
satisfy
human
need,
but
capitals,
e.g.
the
ways
in
which
food
is
manufactured
are
intended
to
make
products
shelf-stable
and
resilient
in
transit,
not
nutritious
and
safe
for
the
end
consumer.
This
paper
will
explore
the
contradiction
between
the
concrete
and
abstract
natures
of
commodities
as
embodied
by
the
food
object
as
a
way
of
illustrating
the
progressive
disavowal
of
human
need
by
capital,
in
spite
of
human
necessitys
pre-
constitutive
role
in
the
formation
of
capitalist
relations.
This
contradiction
creates
not
only
a
profound
crisis
for
human
life,
but
for
capital
itself,
as
it
ceaselessly
negates
the
ground
of
its
own
survival.
Amy
Wendling
A
Brief
History
of
Property:
How
Duties
to
Objects
and
Community
were
transformed
into
Possessive
Individualism
"As
a
concept,
Property
undergoes
some
crucial
modifications
during
the
modern
and
contemporary
periods.
The
talk
looks
at
the
history
of
the
property
concept
in
the
West,
and
traces
the
narrowing
of
this
concept
to
the
form
of
property
holding
we
recognize
as
possessive
individualism.
Possessive
individualism,
as
its
name
indicates,
is
the
form
of
property
holding
most
likely
to
produce
the
Tragedy
of
the
Commons.
To
illustrate
this,
the
talk
will
discuss
the
troubles
of
the
property
concept,
once
narrowed
into
the
form
of
possessive
individualism,
when
it
is
applied
to
resources
like
surface
and
groundwaters.
A
related
feature
of
possessive
individualism
is
its
disregard
for
the
qualities
of
the
things
held
as
property,
in
favor
of
abstract
quantifications
such
as
their
exchange
value
or
functionality.
So,
as
the
property
concept
comes
to
range
over
more
and
more
kinds
of
things,
it
does
so
by
abstracting
from
their
precise
qualities.
The
talk
will
draw
on
Marxs
histories
of
the
property
concept
in
various
notebooks
and
published
works."
Chris
Williams
Assessing
Development
Strategies
in
the
Context
of
Neoliberalism
and
the
Age
of
Ecological
Crisis:
A
Comparative
Analysis
of
Vietnam,
Morocco
and
Bolivia
"Vietnam,
Morocco
and
Bolivia,
where
I
have
spent
the
last
few
months
examining
the
nexus
of
energy,
water
and
food
in
the
context
of
climate
change,
are
three
rapidly
developing
countries
which
are
simultaneously
among
the
most
severely
threatened
by
global
warming.
While
each
is
on
a
slightly
different
developmental
pathway,
through
capitalist
economic
development
and
growth,
each
is
attempting
to
escape
the
legacy,
amongst
other
power
dynamics,
of
unequal
ecological
exchange
generated
by
a
history
of
European
colonization
and
domination.
As
such,
in
the
new
age
of
ecological
crisis,
they
offer
striking
examples
of
how
ruling
elites
in
each
country,
as
well
as
the
working
people
they
govern,
are
further
assimilating
into
a
United
States-dominated,
globalized
and
neoliberal
capitalism.
In
a
quite
striking
manner,
government
reports
are
replete
with
references
to
climate
change
and
the
need
to
develop
in
ecologically
sustainable
ways.
Yet,
in
practice,
government
policy
often
contradicts
their
own
reports.
The
process
is
therefore
highly
contradictory
and
conflictual,
as
nation
states
see
their
salvation
through
a
prism
of
helter-skelter
growth
based
on
exports,
industrialized
agriculture,
and
the
exploitation
of
natural
resources
which
can
be
seen
as
a
form
of
green
neocolonialism.
Analysis
of
these
countries
on
three
separate
continents,
which
in
many
ways
exemplify
combined
and
uneven
development,
offer
the
opportunity
to
examine
how
internal
pressures
combine
with
larger,
external
forces
of
imperial
power
and
capitalist
dynamics,
to
produce
developmentalist
states
in
the
context
of
expected
severe
climate
disruption.
How
much
room
for
maneuver
do
these
states
have,
and
what
would
be
required
for
any
of
them
to
move
in
a
recognizably
different
direction?
One
that
increases
climate
resilience,
ecological
sustainability
and
social
equity?
To
what
extent
can
one
argue
any
of
them
are
doing
so?
As
a
comparative
analysis,
this
paper
will
examine
similarities
and
differences
in
order
to
generalize
from
these
examples
and
posit
potential
alternatives."
Jocelyn
Wills
Satellite
Surveillance
and
Outer
Space
Capitalism,
Jocelyn
Wills,
History,
Brooklyn
College,
City
University
of
New
York
"My
paper
will
explore
the
ways
in
which
capitalism
in
outer
space
incorporated
satellite-
based
surveillance
technologies,
firms,
entrepreneurs,
and
workers
in
Canada
into
regional
industrial,
academic
and
military
alliances,
particularly
with
the
United
States.
I
employ
research
on
the
45-year
history
of
Canadas
MacDonald,
Dettwiler
and
Associates
(MDA)
as
a
case
study
in
this
development.
Founded
in
Vancouver,
British
Columbia
during
1969,
MDA
evolved
from
a
four-person
software
consultancy
into
one
of
the
worlds
most
significant
suppliers
of
reconnaissance,
communications
and
earth
observation
satellites,
as
well
as
a
prime
commercial
and
government
contractor
for
surveillance
and
intelligence
information.
MDA
is
also
a
major
provider
of
the
ground
stations
that
receive,
process,
archive,
and
exploit
satellite
data,
the
navigational
systems
that
support
aircraft
(including
unmanned
aerial
vehicles,
commonly
known
as
drones),
and
robots
working
in
space.
The
path
from
a
small,
local
firm
to
a
global
operation
was
not
smooth,
but
throughout
the
stages
of
MDAs
development,
engineers
and
scientists
consistently
maintained
their
faith
in
technologys
power
to
revolutionise
the
world
for
the
better.
That
faith,
along
with
MDAs
increasing
integration
into
the
USAs
military-industrial-academic
complex
and
participation
in
the
commercialisation
and
commodification
of
outer
space,
demonstrates
that
a
critical
engagement
with
historical
materialism
continues
to
matter
to
our
understanding
of
society
and
outer
space.
Sociologists
Johan
Sderberg
and
Adam
Netzn
suggest
that
despite
the
post-structural
turn,
a
rejection
of
the
dialectic,
and
the
project
of
deconstructing
the
dichotomy
between
human
agency
and
the
larger
structural
forces
of
capitalism,
we
need
to
remember
that
human
subjects/classes
and
power
structures
have
remained
relatively
stable
precisely
because
we
are
living
in
a
society
seduced
by
dreams
about
perpetual
change
and
newness.
(Sderberg
and
Netzn,
2010,
97,
111)
MDAs
experience
reinforces
this
need.
Karl
Marx
may
have
underestimated
the
adaptability
of
capitalism,
the
many
stages,
technological
innovations
and
class
fractions
it
might
produce.
(Bourdieu,
1984,
283-317)
But
Marx
made
astute
historical
observations,
including:
Men
make
their
own
history,
but
they
do
not
make
it
just
as
they
please;
they
do
not
make
it
under
circumstances
chosen
by
themselves,
but
under
circumstances
directly
encountered,
given
and
transmitted
from
the
past.
(Marx,
1994,
1)
Historians
care
about
such
contexts
as
we
map
change
(and
continuity)
over
time.
Looking
at
the
context
behind
the
MDA
experience
does
not
mean,
however,
that
new
theoretical
approaches
and
the
relationships,
systems,
networks,
and
products
that
people
create
and
engage
do
not
matter.
Rather,
it
is
the
synergy
between
an
uncritical
faith
in
new
technology
and
the
post-structural,
technology
turn
that
has
tended
to
obscure
the
larger
historical
forces
that
drew
MDA
and
others
into
outer
space
projects
in
the
first
place.
MDAs
competitive
posturing
in
outer
space
resulted
in
increased
economic
crises
and
the
further
consolidation
of
the
global
elite
while
simultaneously
contributing
to
increased
global
uncertainty,
including
job
insecurity.
Because
they
thought
they
were
different
from
previous
industrial
workers,
most
engineers
at
MDA
simply
adjusted
to
the
next
phase
of
capitalism
rather
than
challenge
it.
In
this
they
were
far
from
alone.
People
from
all
walks
of
life
rationalise
their
decisions
and
choose
selective
memories
from
the
past
to
make
sense
of
their
current
circumstances.
Social
anthropologist
Hylton
White
recently
captured
this
reality.
In
an
environment
structured
for
unending
expansion,
he
reminds
us
that
capitalism
inevitably
turns
each
new
wave
of
technological
enthusiasm,
gadget
and
profession
from
an
exotic
first
to
a
ubiquitous
commodity.
(White,
2013,
667-81)
Satellite-based
surveillance
technologies
and
outer
space
are
no
different.
The
paper
will
provide
an
overview
of
satellite-based
surveillance
technologies,
their
applications
and
users,
and
how
they
influence
daily
life.
I
then
turn
to
the
historical
context
MDA
inherited
from
previous
generations.
Finally,
I
focus
on
MDA,
and
what
lessons
we
might
draw
from
the
firms
stages
of
development,
the
capitalists
who
guided
the
firm,
and
how
MDAs
engineers
adjusted
to
their
role
as
workers
over
time."
Colin
Wilson
Wolfreys
Austerity
politics
and
the
relationship
between
conservatism
and
fascism
"Austerity
politics
and
the
relationship
between
conservatism
and
fascism
The
European
elections
of
2104
saw
an
unprecedented
rise
in
votes
for
fascist
and
authoritarian
populist
parties
campaigning
on
an
anti-immigration
platform.
This
paper
focuses
on
the
4.7m
votes
achieved
by
the
Front
National
(FN)
in
France
and
the
4.4m
votes
for
UKIP
in
the
UK.
Do
these
results
reflect
a
capacity
on
the
part
of
such
parties
to
win
lasting
electoral
support?
Are
these
scores
primarily
a
symptom
of
the
fragmentation
of
the
mainstream
right,
reflecting
the
disarray
of
a
traditional
conservative
electorate,
or
is
there
evidence
to
suggest
that
working
class
voters
are
being
won
from
the
left
to
authoritarian
politics
via
a
racist
agenda?
The
paper
examines
the
long-term
implications
of
growing
electoral
support
for
authoritarian
populist
and
fascist
parties.
It
assesses
the
role
played
by
mainstream
parties
in
legitimizing
racist
attitudes
towards
immigrants,
situating
the
claims
made
by
Labour
politicians
that
the
party
must
take
a
tougher
line
on
mass
migration
from
Europe
in
the
context
of
the
failure
of
the
UMP
and
the
Parti
Socialiste
to
stem
the
rise
of
the
Front
National
by
pandering
to
racist
attitudes
towards
migrants.
It
examines
the
relationship
between
conservative
and
authoritarian
populist
parties
and
fascism.
To
what
extent
do
parties
like
UKIP,
or
initiatives
like
those
developed
by
Philippe
de
Villiers
in
France,
act
as
temporary
transmission
belts
between
the
mainstream
right
and
parties
with
an
extra-parliamentary
agenda?
Are
they,
and
developments
like
the
anti-gay
marriage
protests
of
2013
in
France,
indications
of
a
more
durable
structural
shift
in
the
political
landscape
of
the
right?
What
evidence
is
there
to
suggest
that
electoral
support
can
be
translated
into
organizational
reserves
for
UKIP
and
the
FN?
What
are
the
differences
in
terms
of
strategy,
organizational
structure
and
ideology
between
populist
parties
and
the
far-right?
What
strategies
should
the
left
develop
to
combat
their
rise?
The
paper
draws
on
historical
studies
of
the
relationship
between
conservatism
and
fascism
to
conclude
that
the
interplay
between
the
two
traditions
is
fluid,
providing
an
assessment
of
potential
outcomes
drawing
on
comparative
contemporary
and
historical
analyses
of
the
relationship
between
political
traditions
in
transition
and
economic
crisis."
Jamie
Woodcock
Possibilities
for
new
workplace
organisation:
workers
refusal
and
the
challenges
for
trade
unions.
The
trade
union
movement
in
the
UK
faces
a
number
of
difficult
challenges:
failing
to
confront
austerity,
falling
membership,
and
an
inability
to
relate
to
precarious
workers.
The
possibilities
for
overcoming
these
are
often
conceived
of
in
terms
of
trade
union
renewal
or
the
adoption
of
an
organising
model.
While
these
are
important
perspectives
for
those
workers
already
in
trade
unions,
they
fail
to
consider
the
large
number
of
workers
who
are
not
members
of
trade
unions.
To
address
these
questions
it
is
necessary
to
begin
with
the
workplace,
rather
than
the
trade
union.
This
paper
seeks
to
explore
how
the
questions
of
resistance
in
the
workplace
can
be
linked
to
an
organisational
strategy
through
a
number
of
examples.
It
will
consider
the
role
of
academic
research
in
relation
to
workers
struggle
by
drawing
on
the
debates
on
the
use
of
workers
inquiries,
specifically
in
the
Italian
Workerist
tradition.
Mario
Trontis
concept
of
the
strategy
of
refusal
will
be
used
to
refocus
the
analysis
on
the
activity
of
workers
themselves
and
consider
the
possibilities
of
new
organisational
forms.
In
conclusion,
the
paper
will
argue
for
an
intervention
into
the
debates
on
trade
unionism
that
combines
critical
theory
with
emerging
examples.
Xavier
Wrona
Xavier do Monte
Consumer
bodies:
queer
and
class
in
Brazil's
"rolezinhos"
"The
paper
proposes
the
use
of
Claire
Hemmings'
statement
of
neo-liberalism
as
precisely
not
queer
to
analyze
the
phenomenon
of
Brazil's
rolezinhos.
Rolezinhos
are
a
brazilian
mass
movement
that
have
been
happening
for
a
couple
of
years
and
recently
called
the
media's
attention
after
a
police
confrotation
during
one
of
their
demonstrations.
At
the
beginning
of
2014,
a
group
of
young
people
from
the
peripheral
areas
of
So
Paulo
decided
to
go
in
a
large
group
to
a
central
shopping
mall,
resulting
in
the
group
being
stopped
by
the
shopping
mall
security
for
no
apparent
reason,
except
the
fact
of
their
race
and
social
origin.
Rolezinhos
are
scheduled
through
social
networks
and
they
gather
circa
of
twenty
people
at
a
time,
most
of
them
poor
adolescents
looking
for
a
leisure
time.
The
phenomenon
of
rolezinhos
arrive
in
the
moment
where
the
politics
of
inclusion
of
the
Labour
Party
of
the
past
twelve
years
are
being
criticized.
Despite
their
success
in
pulling
millions
of
working
class
people
from
poverty,
the
focus
on
turning
the
workers
into
consumers
instead
of
citizens
starts
to
show
its
limits.
Rolezinhos
clearly
define
one
of
those
limits,
and
allows
to
think
about
the
limits
of
neo-liberal
capitalist
and
developmental
discourse
in
emergent
powers
such
as
Brazil.
Liberal
discourse
advances
the
thesis
that
inclusion,
difference
and
multiculturalism
are
possible
once
all
subject-consumer-citizens
have
accepted
some
basic
rules
of
the
game.
Rolezinhos
show
that
the
subject-consumer-citizen
of
neoliberal
discourse
is
not
so
open
and
multicultural
it
has
a
normativity,
a
body,
and
a
race.
The
paper
will
try
to
demonstrate
how
the
racialized
bodies
of
youths
from
the
peripheries
of
So
Paulo
perform
a
sort
of
class
queer
in
relation
to
neo-liberal
discourse,
which
doesn't
recognize
them,
and
doesn't
allow
them
the
privileges
of
participating
in
spaces
that
were
promised
to
be
opened
by
their
position
as
consumers."
Galip
Yalman
"The
Turkish
economy
during
the
2000s
even
before
the
2008
global
financial
crisis
has
been
manifesting
the
symptoms
of
jobless
growth
as
the
increases
in
labour
productivity
have
not
been
accompanied
by
an
improvement
in
real
wages
or
labour
participation
rates
under
the
Justice
and
Development
Party
(AKP)
rule.
Meanwhile,
an
ambitious
acceleration
of
the
process
of
privatization
by
the
AKP
government,
seems
to
have
made
the
country,
an
investors
paradise
from
the
perspective
of
international
finance
capital.
The
privatizations
of
the
large-scale
profitable
state
economic
enterprises
(SEEs)
were
facilitated
through
legislative
changes
that
favoured
foreign
and
domestic
powerful
capital
groups.
However,
the
actual
brunt
of
this
neoliberal
assault
has
been
carried
by
the
workers
of
the
privatized
companies
who
tended
either
to
lose
their
jobs
in
mass
and
were
deprived
of
their
social
rights
or
were
forced
to
work
in
conditions
that
are
increasingly
perceived
to
be
comparable
with
the
19th
century
working
conditions
of
todays
industrialized
countries.
If
the
fate
of
the
workers
of
Tekel
tobacco
products
and
alcoholic
beveridges
monopoly
-
which
was
dismantled
in
order
to
be
privatized
-
provided
a
case
for
the
former,
the
coal
miners
who
paid
with
their
lives
for
being
subjected
to
the
abject
conditions
of
precarity
in
the
recent
mining
disaster
in
Soma
coal
mine
could
be
considered
as
a
saddening
example
of
the
latter.
This
paper
aims
to
provide
a
critical
review
of
the
deliberate
strategies
of
labour
containment
by
the
AKP
government
which
produced
different
modalities
of
the
reproduction
of
labour
as
victims
of
privatization
as
many
workers
who
suffered
the
consequences
of
these
strategies
have
called
themselves.
Hence,
it
will
attempt
to
develop
an
analysis
of
the
case
of
Tekel
workers
and
Soma
coal
miners
in
a
comparative
framework
so
as
to
explore
the
possibilities
for
developing
counter-hegemonic
strategies
and/or
the
reasons
for
lack
of
them."
Faruk
Yalvac
The
authors
of
this
paper
have
written
two
small
books
(Ryggvik,
2013;
Ytterstad,
2013)
that
have
played
a
significant
part
towards
erecting
a
campaign
with
the
two-fold
message
of
May
Day.
But
the
popularity
of
the
idea
of
100
000
new
climate
jobs,
and
the
verbal
support
for
cutting
Norwegian
oil
in
half,
is
not
the
same
as
actual
change.
The
Norwegian
Parliament
is
just
about
to
open
the
new
Sverdrup
Field
in
the
North
Sea
which
alone
will
increase
emissions
by
25
per
cent.
This
paper
is
a
first
attempt
to
develop
into
one
single
article,
a
reduction
and
mobilizing
strategy
for
stopping
the
break-neck
extraction
of
Norwegian
oil,
AND
a
viable
planned
intervention
to
create
100
000
jobs
in
offshore,
wind,
transport
and
buildings.
Drawing
on
previous
critiques
both
of
the
political
economy
of
oil
(Ryggvik
2010)
and
the
hegemony
of
Norwegian
Climate
change
policy
(Nilsen
2001,
Ytterstad
2012),
the
first
part
of
the
paper
debunks
key
arguments
of
the
oil-industrial
complex
in
Norway
(e.g
Norwegian
clean
oil
and
gas
is
better
than
coal,
or
that
Norwegian
emissions
are
locked
into
EU
targets
anyway).
The
second
part
draws
on
the
lessons
of
the
nascent
much
broader
climate
movement
itself
(Ytterstad
forthcoming)
as
well
as
from
the
emerging
literature
of
environmental
labour
studies
(Rthzel
and
Uzzell
2012)
to
argue
for
working
class
agency
aided
and
corrected
by
other
popular
forces,
like
climate
justice
movements,
students
involved
in
divestment
campaigns
at
Norwegian
Universities
or
faith
groups.
The
last
part
of
the
paper
suggest
an
action
plan
before
the
COP
20
meeting
in
Paris,
which
unlike
previous
rounds
of
Summit
demonstrations
is
squarely
focused
on
national
action
(cf
Hovden
and
Lindseth
2004).
Climate
jobs
in
Norway
as
bridge
towards
a
renewable
Norway,
is
we
believe
the
message
that
will
best
strengthen
a
global
campaign
for
climate
jobs
to
keep
carbon
in
the
ground.
Mehmet
Yusufoglu
power
plants,
brutal
mining
laws
against
nature
and
labor,
proliferation
of
coal
burning
energy
plants
and
nuclear
power
investments
were
guaranteed
by
many
legal
regulations
and
laws.
Trying
to
compete
with
Russia
ad
China;
capital
used
a
two
layer
place
oriented
strategy.
Close
markets
in
Europe
and
middle
east
for
energy-material
intensive
products
was
their
first
aim.
Secondly
the
relative
surplus
value
created
depending
on
the
advantage
of
the
place
in
the
energy
and
mining
production
became
a
good
opportunity
mainly
for
the
capitalist
which
have
closer
ties
with
the
developmentalist
neoliberal
government
who
wants
the
create
support
its
own
scattered
capital
against
the
old
finance
capital
groups
which
are
still
dominant
in
Turkish
economy.
These
new
capitalists
exploited
their
close
relations
in
getting
licenses
and
permits
for
commodification
of
natural
resources
and
cycles.
So
there
is
a
intra
class
struggle
parameter
in
the
event.
The
widely
discussed
importance
of
construction
sector
and
the
urbanization
rent
was
a
complementary
of
this
energy-material
intensive
structure.
Uneven
urbanization
became
main
sources
of
income
distribution
problems.
Other
than
the
energy
cost,
low
cost
of
labor
power
(
increased
subcontractor
relations
in
production
processes,
chemicalisation
of
food,
delayed
and
covered
damage
of
environmental
problems
on
workers,
poor
working
and
safety
conditions,
increased
effectiveness
of
social
aid
and
social
services
for
low
wage
earners
and
precarious
workers)
is
especially
necessary
for
service
sectors
in
the
city
and
subcontractors
of
the
main
export
industries.
The
costs
of
products
of
subcontracting
companies
(
e.g.
producers
of
car
parts)
are
important
factors
in
external
competition.
Hence
the
energy
cost
and
labor
cost
reduction
policies
combined
in
Soma
coal
mines.
The
301
miners
who
lost
their
lives
were
producing
cheap
energy
for
construction
sector
and
mainly
export
industries
which
try
to
ease
the
cost
of
floating
energy
prices
and
exchange
values
which
increases
energy
costs.
Unequal
ecological
and
economic
exchange
matters
in
multi-scales."
Ivan
Zambrana-Flores
conflicts,
especially
as
regards
overlapping
territorial
claims,
extractive
frontiers
and
large
infrastructure
projects.
In
this
article,
we
analyze
the
TIPNIS
conflict
around
a
planned
road
through
a
protected
area
as
a
case
study
to
shed
light
on
the
deeper
sources
and
dynamics
of
conflict
as
identified
from
a
political
ecology
perspective.
More
attention
needs
to
be
devoted
to
the
internal
contradictions
of
environmental
and
indigenist
discourses,
instead
of
solely
focusing
critiques
on
inconsistency
in
government
policies.
Carlos
Zamora
The
paradox
of
modernization:
the
alleged
territorial
hegemony
of
the
Brazilian
state
against
capital's
structural
crisis
Aiming
at
a
theoretical
and
critical
analysis
of
the
Brazilians
development
our
approach
aims
to
contribute
to
an
analysis
of
current
power
relations
and
the
prominent
role
that
Latin
America,
represented
by
Brazil,
can
play
in
setting
another
new
world
order.
Redeem
the
historical
dimension
of
socioeconomic
life,
reduced
by
immediate
interests
that
consolidates
power
relations,
is
to
assert
that
any
contribution
to
the
critique
of
International
Political
Economy
not
expend
effort
to
emphasize
the
paradox
of
modernity
is
just
a
baseless
justification
for
restoration
of
bubbles
financial
characteristics
of
a
system
that
was
built
on
the
pillars
of
inequality
and
monetary
rationality.
After
power
relations
underlie
the
idea
that
underdevelopment
is
the
reverse
of
the
development
and
the
two
poles
are
the
same
historical
field.
Therefore,
only
with
an
International
Political
Economy,
which
prioritizes
the
principle
of
interdependence
,
can
engender
the
actual
development
Andreja
Zivkovic
the
nation-state
as
a
weak
link,
a
space
of
the
condensation,
articulation
and
displacement
of
the
contradictions
of
capitalist
accumulation
within
the
European
empire,
and
thus
the
starting
point
for
the
conceptualization
of
political
strategy
proper;
and
dialectically,
the
only
points
from
which
one
can
pose
the
questions
of
national
self-determination
and
the
transformation
of
economic
relations
for
Europe
as
a
whole.
Luciana
Zorzoli
What
does
structural
reforms
meant
to
worker's
organizations?
The
impact
of
neoliberalism
in
the
trade
union
model
in
Argentina.
"Despite
a
longstanding
tradition
in
the
marxist
study
of
neoliberalism
and
the
impact
of
structural
reforms
on
trade
union
structure,
there
are
still
a
wealth
of
important
aspects
to
be
studied
in
Latin
America
since
neoliberalism
has
succeeded
in
promoting
massive
changes
in
most
of
the
relevant
areas
that
frame
trade
union
structure:
industrial
relations
including
the
labour
market
and
workforce
composition
(unemployment,
precarization,
outsourcing),
labour/state
relations,
and
the
form
of
the
state.
This
paper
aims
them
to
bring
light,
along
the
roots
of
actual
trade
union
structures
in
Argentina.
We
will
critically
review
academic
production
and
challenge
their
understanding
of
the
trade
unions
model
through
a
case
where
all
this
tensions
have
been
revealed:
the
murder
of
Mariano
Ferreyra,
a
young
grass
root
activist
by
members
of
""Unin
Ferroviaria""
the
Railways
trade
union.
The
judicial
case
(that
lead
its
general
secretary
among
others
to
conviction
in
2012)
will
show
how
this
""business
unionism""
was
formed
and
will
allow
us
to
discuss
structural
changes
in
workers
organizations
stemming
from
neoliberal
reforms
and
the
last
dictatorship."