Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research article
Selenium and spermine alleviate cadmium induced toxicity in the red seaweed
Gracilaria dura by regulating antioxidants and DNA methylation
Manoj Kumar, A.J. Bijo, Ravi S. Baghel, C.R.K. Reddy*, Bhavanath Jha
Discipline of Marine Biotechnology and Ecology, Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute, Council of Scientic and Industrial Research (CSIR), Gijubhai Badheka Marg,
Bhavnagar 364021, India
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 2 August 2011
Accepted 24 October 2011
Available online 10 November 2011
The protective role of exogenously supplied selenium (Se) and polyamines (PAs) such as putrescine (Put)
and spermine (Spm) in detoxifying the cadmium (Cd) induced toxicity was studied in the marine red alga
Gracilaria dura in laboratory conditions. The Cd exposure (0.4 mM) impede the growth of alga while
triggering the reactive oxygen species (ROS viz. O
2 and H2O2) generation, inhibition of antioxidant
system, and enhancing the lipoxygenase (LOX) activity, malondialdehyde (MDA) level and demethylation
of DNA. Additions of Se (50 mM) and/or Spm (1 mM) to the culture medium in contrast to Put, efciently
ameliorated the Cd toxicity by decreasing the accumulation of ROS and MDA contents, while restoring or
enhancing the level of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants and their redox ratio, phycobiliproteins
and phytochelatins, over the controls. The isoforms of antioxidant enzymes namely superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD, w 150 kDa; Fe-SOD w120 kDa), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px, w120 and 140 kDa),
glutathione reductase (GR, w110 kDa) regulated differentially to Se and/or Spm supplementation.
Furthermore, it has also resulted in enhanced levels of endogenous PAs (specially free and bound
insoluble Put and Spm) and n-6 PUFAs (C20-3, n-6 and C20-4, n-6). This is for the rst time wherein Se
and Spm were found to regulate the stabilization of DNA methylation by reducing the events of cytosine
demethylation in a mechanism to alleviate the Cd stress in marine alga. The present ndings reveal that
both Se and Spm play a crucial role in controlling the Cd induced oxidative stress in G. dura.
2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Cadmium
Selenium
Spermine
DNA methylation
Gracilaria dura
Oxidative stress
1. Introduction
Among the resident organism living in the coastal and estuarine
environment, the marine macroalgae (seaweeds) are the most
threatened by chemical toxicants of which metals are of signicant
component because of their persistence, acute toxicity and high
mobility in food chain [1]. Seaweeds despite being prominent
primary producers in near-shore waters, are also key ecosystem
engineers providing conducive habitat for a variety of marine
organisms. Cd is a metal without any known biological function,
except as a cofactor for carbonic anhydrase in a diatom [2], is most
common environmental toxicants with potential for bioaccumulation and persistence in the body of aquatic organisms, and
produce versatile biotic changes in the aquatic ecosystem [3]. Cd
being a redox inactive metal incapable of generating reactive
oxygen species (ROS) directly through Fenton-type/HabereWeiss
* Corresponding author. Tel.: 91 278 256 5801/256 3805x614; fax: 91 278 256
6970/256 7562.
E-mail address: crk@csmcri.org (C.R.K. Reddy).
0981-9428/$ e see front matter 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.10.016
1.66b,c,d
1.20a,b
14.43c
6.02d
5.80c
40.79
19.28
288.25
120.87
87.30
1.34c,d
1.25c
9.19c
7.14d,e
4.55c
38.78
16.45
293.02
117.04
84.41
2.81a,b
1.17a
13.67a
2.86bc
2.93a
42.89
21.22
342.73
159.63
119.12
1.73e
0.82d
8.89d
4.80d,e
6.79d
27.42
11.25
246.35
113.02
75.09
2.77e
0.86d
8.57d
8.19e,f
3.74d
26.30
12.62
234.01
107.29
70.60
2.03a,b,c
1.34a,b
7.47a,b
6.94a
8.56a,b
42.25
20.65
333.58
174.92
111.07
1.90d
1.19b,c
10.19b
3.45c
4.19b
aef
37.78
18.37
321.70
150.36
105.87
3.94a,b
2.77a
9.37a,b
8.86a
5.98a
44.29
21.44
336.30
176.45
119.90
1.84f
1.13d
12.70e
9.49f
4.09d
21.54
10.61
190.44
105.67
73.37
2.38a
1.47a,b
6.25a,b
11.73a,b
4.70b
0.47 0.04a
0.09 0.03d,e
0.10 0.02e
0.12 0.02de
45.02
20.38
334.93
164.94
109.66
0.21 0.02d
0.24 0.02b
0.29 0.03c,d
0.11 0.01d,e
0.11 0.01e
0.16 0.03c
0.33 0.02c
0.20 0.02b
0.39 0.03b
0.13 0.03c,d
0.11 0.02e
0.10 0.02d,e
0.20 0.03d
0.16 0.02c
0.13 0.02e
0.28 0.01a
0.39c
0.74d,e
0.02d
0.0.5c
6.26
3.80
0.33
0.88
0.58b,c
0.62c
0.04c
0.09c
6.73
5.01
0.41
0.94
Cd Spm
0.53a
0.47e,f
0.02e
0.07d
Spm
7.59
3.05
0.20
0.69
0.42d
1.05b
0.04b
0.15b
4.67
7.52
0.59
1.98
Cd Put Se
0.37d
0.89
0.05a
0.18a
4.39
8.75
0.67
2.45
Cd Put
0.45b,c
0.64e,f
0.03e
0.04c
6.80
3.14
0.21
0.73
Put
0.38b,c
0.30c,d
0.04d
0.13c
6.41
4.27
0.29
0.87
Cd Se
0.55a
0.43d,e,f
0.02e,f
0.12c,d
7.85
3.58
0.16
0.81
Se
0.52d
1.02a
0.06a
0.12a
4.32
9.35
0.69
2.28
Cd
0.20a
0.33f
0.03f
0.09d
7.17
2.85
0.14
0.66
Control
Parameters
2. Results
DGR (%)
MDA (nmol g1 FW)
ROS (mmol g1 FW)
LOX (U mg1 protein)
Metal uptake
(mg g1 DW)
Cd
Se
Pigments
(mg g1 FW)
Chlorophyll
Carotenoids
PE
PC
APC
Cd Spm Se
130
131
Fig. 1. Reactive oxygen species generation in G. dura following the Cd (0.4 mM) exposure for 4 d (a) O
2 and (b) H2O2 radicals were detected with nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) and
3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining, respectively. A-H represents the various treatments viz. control, Cd, Se, Cd Se, Cd Put, Cd Put Se, Cd Spm and Cd Spm Se
respectively.
132
Fig. 2. Changes in the endogenous polyamines level (mmol g1 FW) in G. dura following the Cd (0.4 mM) exposure for 4 d. Put, Spd and Spm represents putrescine, spermidine and
spermine respectively. Different lowercase on the similar bars indicate signicance limits (p < 0.05).
over the control with value 0.73 mmol g1 FW and redox ratio 2.03
respectively (Table 2).
2.3. Antioxidative enzymes activities and their in-gel assay
All the studied antioxidative enzymes exhibited enhanced
activities in the plants exposed to Cd together with Se and/or Spm
treatments. The specic activities of SOD, APX, GR and GSH-Px
except POX increased by 1.4e1.9 fold (p < 0.05) in Cd Se,
Cd Spm, Cd Spm Se treatments while decreased considerably
in Cd, Cd Put, Cd Put Se treatments, over the control activities
with 87, 0.63, 1.25 and 0.99 U mg1 protein respectively (Fig. 3(a)).
Native PAGE analysis supported the spectrophotometric measurements of these enzymes activities (Fig. 3(b)). Apparent higher
activity of SOD observed in Se and Spm treatments was solely
attributed to Mn-SOD (SOD-1,w150 kDa) and Fe-SOD (SOD2,w120 kDa) conrmed by using H2O2/KCN as inhibitors, while
a partial or complete inhibition of Zn-SOD (SOD-3,w100 kDa) was
also observed in Cd, Cd Put and Cd Spm and Cd Spm Se
treatments. Both spectrophotometric analysis as well as in-gel
assay for POX activity indicated its maximal inhibition in the
thalli exposed to Cd, Cd Put, Cd Put Se treatments, while its
activity restored signicantly in plants grown in Se and Spm supplemented media. GR and GSH-Px in particular revealed the
specic response to the Cd exposure and exhibited three isoforms
133
Table 2
Changes in the level of water soluble antioxidants in G. dura following the exposure to Cd (0.4 mM) Se (50 mM) and PAs (1 mM) individually or in dif ferent combinations for 4 d.
NP-SH, PCs, GSSG and GSH (each in mmol g1 FW) indicates non-protein thiols, phytocheletins, oxidised and reduced glutathione respectively. DHA and AsA indicate oxidised
and reduced ascorbate respectively.
Treatments
NP-SH
Control
Cd
Se
Cd Se
Cd Put
Cd Put Se
Cd Spm
Cd Spm Se
LSD (5%)
1.29
1.92
2.00
3.41
2.07
2.21
3.45
3.29
0.43
a-e
GSSG
0.15c
0.37b
0.15b
0.18a
0.30b
0.28b
0.31a
0.33a
0.22
0.47
0.33
0.34
0.48
0.41
0.30
0.25
0.04
GSH
0.04e
0.03a
0.02c
0.03c
0.04a
0.02b
0.02c,d
0.03d,e
0.26
0.17
0.37
0.51
0.21
0.23
0.60
0.68
0.07
GSH/GSSG
0.05d
0.03e
0.08c
0.01b
004d,e
0.01d,e
0.03a
0.08a
1.03
0.37
1.10
1.51
0.45
0.56
1.99
2.74
0.45
0.31d
0.08e
0.29c,d
0.13c
0.12e
0.03e
0.15b
0.23a
PCs
1.02
1.75
1.64
2.90
1.86
1.98
2.86
2.62
0.46
DHA
0.20c
0.40b
0.12b
0.19a
0.28b
0.28b
0.30a
0.40a
0.36
0.45
0.34
0.54
0.43
0.59
0.36
0.25
0.07
AsA
0.02c,d
0.07b
0.06d
0.04a
0.03b,c
0.05a
0.04c,d
0.03e
0.73
0.49
0.74
1.24
0.47
0.51
1.50
1.43
0.30
AsA/DHA
0.21d
0.15c
0.19d
0.24b
0.19c
0.13c
0.21a
0.13a
2.03
1.15
2.23
2.30
1.10
0.86
4.15
5.70
0.81
0.63c
0.54d
0.80c
0.32c
0.46d
0.19d
0.20b
0.52a
Fig. 3. Effect of Cd (0.4 mM) exposure on (a) antioxidative enzymes activities (U mg1 protein) and (b) their isoenzyme analysis in G. dura in various treatments index from A-H
according to Fig. 1. Different lowercase on the bars indicate signicance limits (p < 0.05).
134
Table 3
Changes in the fatty acids composition (% total fatty acids) in G. dura following the exposure to Cd (0.4 mM), Se (50 mM) and PAs (1 mM) individually or in different
combinations for 4 d. UFA and SFA indicates unsaturated and saturated fatty acids respectively.
Fatty acids
Control
C14:0
C15:0
C16:0
C18:0
C16:1(n-7)
C18:1(n-9) cis
C18:1(n-9) trans
C20:3(n6)
C20:4(n-6)
UFA/SFA
1.00
e
34.48
3.15
e
0.45
3.19
6.15
51.59
1.50
aef
Cd
0.11d
1.31c
0.20d
0.05e,f
0.15d
0.31a
2.75b
0.10b
1.97
e
56.93
5.30
3.00
2.72
4.14
2.69
27.18
0.47
Se
0.15a
1.55a
0.52b
0.17a
0.21a
0.33c
0.28d
1.97d
0.02d
1.34
e
34.01
2.54
e
0.62
2.53
6.64
52.37
1.56
0.11c
1.48c
0.19e
0.06e
0.20e
0.33a
2.26b
0.11b
Cd Se
Cd Put
e
e
30.17
2.22
e
0.33
3.36
6.33
56.74
1.95
2.04
1.12
57.37
6.34
2.15
2.46
5.21
3.69
24.18
0.42
1.60d
0.15e
0.06f
0.21d
0.23a
0.58a
0.09a
016a
0.07a
1.69a
0.40a
0.26b
0.15b
0.29b
0.39c
3.10d
0.05d
Cd Put Se
1.54
0.56
56.53
5.89
e
0.61
2.36
4.81
25.73
0.47
0.08b
0.08b
1.17a
0.41a
0.07e
0.11e
0.41b
0.90d
0.01d
Cd Spm
Cd Spm Se
LSD (5%)
e
e
37.23
5.14
e
2.10
5.05
6.34
46.90
1.26
e
e
38.98
3.77
e
1.65
6.80
6.44
43.81
1.18
0.16
0.06
2.36
0.53
0.17
0.22
0.38
0.52
3.77
0.12
1.21b
0.24b
0.24c
0.23b
0.38a
2.48c
0.08c
1.62b
0.35c
0.08d
0.30a
0.21a
3.21c
0.08c
Table 4
Variation in DNA methylation pattern of G. dura following the exposure to Cd (0.4 mM), Se (50 mM) and polyamines (1 mM) individually or in different combinations for 4 d. Put,
Spm, Cd and Se indicate putrescine, spermine, cadmium and selenium respectively. and indicate the presence and absence of bands respectively. Class AeP represents the
different conditions of methylation patterns where Class AeC represents unchanged events with no polymorphic bands, Class DeH represents hypomethylation events and
class IeM represents hypermethylation events. Class NeP represents cases of methylation status of the CCGG sequence between control and treated samples showing
unambiguous information.
Parameter
Class
Methylation pattern
Control
HpaII
Banding pattern
Not polymorphic bands
Demethylation events
(Hypomethylation)
Methylation events
(Hypermethylation)
Not informative
B
e
C
E
e
F
e
G
e
H
e
I
N
e
O
e
P
e
Number of sites
Treated
Msp I
HpaII
Msp I
Cd
Se
Cd Se
Put Cd
Put Cd Se
Spm Cd
Spm Cd Se
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
2
3
68
2
5
9
3
2
2
5
1
3
1
4
2
4
3
3
76
1
2
4
1
0
2
7
1
3
3
4
1
5
2
5
72
2
2
6
1
2
2
8
2
4
3
4
1
4
3
2
66
3
4
8
2
2
3
6
2
4
1
4
4
2
4
3
66
2
3
7
2
2
3
9
1
2
2
5
1
4
3
1
71
4
2
6
1
2
1
8
2
3
3
3
4
2
2
2
74
2
1
5
3
0
2
11
3
4
1
2
4
3
135
136
137
Acknowledgments
The rst author (MK) gratefully acknowledges the Council of
Scientic and Industrial Research (CSIR) for awarding the senior
research fellowship.
138
References
[1] T. Han, S.H. Kang, J.S. Park, H.K. Lee, M.T. Brown, Physiological responses of
Ulva pertusa and U. armoricana to copper exposure, Aquat. Toxicol. 86 (2008)
176e184.
[2] T.W. Lane, F.M.M. Morel, A biological function for cadmium in marine diatoms,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000) 4627e4631.
[3] M. Kumar, P. Kumari, V. Gupta, P.A. Anisha, C.R.K. Reddy, B. Jha, Differential
responses to cadmium induced oxidative stress in marine macroalga Ulva
lactuca (Ulvales, Chlorophyta), Biometals 23 (2010a) 315e325.
[4] E. Pinto, T.C.S. Sigaud-kutner, M.A.S. Leitao, O.K. Okamoto, D. Morse,
P. Colepicolo, Heavy metal-induced oxidative stress in algae, J. Phycol. 39
(2003) 1008e1018.
[5] J. Collen, E. Pinto, M. Pedersen, P. Colepicolo, Induction of oxidative stress in
the red macroalga Gracilaria tenuistipitata by pollutant metals, Arch. Environ.
Contam. Toxicol. 45 (2003) 337e342.
[6] L. Contreras, D. Mella, A. Moenne, J.A. Correa, Differential responses to copper
induced oxidative stress in the marine macroalgae Lessonia nigrescens and
Scytosiphon lomentaria (Phaeophyceae), Aquat. Toxicol. 94 (2009) 94e102.
[7] T.M. Wu, Y.T. Hsu, M. Sung, T.M. Lee, Expression of genes involved in redox
homeostasis and antioxidant defense in a marine macroalga Ulva fasciata by
excess copper, Aquat. Toxicol. 94 (2009) 275e285.
[8] B. Pawlik-Skowronska, J. Pirszel, M.T. Brown, Concentrations of phytochelatins
and glutathione found in natural assemblages of seaweeds depend on species
and metal concentrations of the habitat, Aquat. Toxicol. 83 (2007) 190e199.
[9] R. Trevisan, F.D. Mello, A.S. Fisher, P.M. Schuwerack, A.L. Dafre, A.J. Moody,
Selenium in water enhances antioxidant defenses and protects against
copper-induced DNA damage in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis, Aquat. Toxicol.
101 (2011) 64e71.
[10] Z. Pedrero, Y. Madrid, H. Hartikainen, C. Camara, Protective effect of selenium
in Broccoli (Brassica oleracea) plants subjected to cadmium exposure, J. Agric.
Food Chem. 56 (2008) 266e271.
[11] P. Cartes, A. Jara, L. Pinilla, A. Rosas, M.L. Mora, Selenium improves the antioxidant ability against aluminium-induced oxidative stress in rye grass roots,
Ann. Appl. Biol. 156 (2010) 297e307.
[12] A. Guzman-Uriostegui, P. Garcia-Jimenez, F. Marian, D. Robledo, R.R. Robaina,
Polyamines inuence maturation in reproductive structures of Gracilaria
cornea (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta), J. Phycol. 38 (2002) 1169e1175.
[13] M.S. Sung, T.J. Chow, T.M. Lee, Polyamine acclimation alleviates hypersalinity
induced oxidative stress in a marine green macroalga Ulva fasciata by
modulation of antioxidative enzyme gene expression, J. Phycol. 47 (2011)
538e547.
[14] M. Filek, R. Keskinen, H. Hartikainen, I. Szarejko, A. Janiak, Z. Miszalski,
A. Golda, The protective role of selenium in rape seedlings subjected to
cadmium stress, J. Plant Physiol. 165 (2008) 833e844.
[15] L.N. Lukens, S.H. Zhan, The plant genomes methylation status and response to
stress, implications for plant improvement, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10 (2007)
317e322.
[16] S. Herbette, L. Taconnat, V. Hugouvieux, L. Piette, M.L.M. Magniette, S. Cuine,
P. Auroy, P. Richaud, C. Forestier, J. Bourguignon, J.P. Renou, A. Vavasseur,
N. Leonhardt, Genome-wide transcriptome proling of the early cadmium
response of Arabidopsis roots and shoots, Biochimie 88 (2006) 1751e1765.
[17] T.G. Sors, D.R. Ellis, D.E. Salt, Selenium uptake, translocation, assimilation and
metabolic fate in plants, Photosynth. Res. 86 (2005) 373e389.