Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Motivation of Research
Mitral valves fail mechanically due to disease states such as mitral valve prolapse.
Cryopreservation is used to save tissue for later analysis, but freezing tissues may
change the mechanical properties of the tissue
This research evaluates the effects of different freezing mechanisms on the mechanical
properties of mitral valve tissue
Results Continued
MVP
* p < 0.01
5
2
Statistical Methods
n = 4
Data was analyzed using ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey HSD testing
* p < 0.01 defined for significance; ^ p < 0.15 defined as a trend
0.5
Data
Youngs line
Linear Region
Extensibility
Ultimate Stress/Strain
Toe Region
Radius of Curve
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Strain (mm/mm)
0.5
0.6
0.7
(Left) Data Analysis Summary. Youngs modulus is calculated to be the slope of the linear region during
which the collagen has uncrimped and is being pulled to failure. The extensibility is taken to be the linear
extrapolation of Young's line to the x intercept and represents the point in testing when the stress is being
balanced by collagen integrity rather than uncrimping. The ultimate stress and strain are measured to be the
point at which the valve integrity fails and it rips. (Right) Hysteresis is the area between the loading and
unloading curves and represents the energy lost during the process of loading and unloading tissue
Flow
Meter
LV Chamber
Obtain fresh porcine hearts from abattoir (Fisher Ham and Meats, Spring, TX)
Less hysteresis represents more elastic behavior and less viscous behavior
Freezing time between 1-12 weeks also has little effect on the valves mechanical
properties
Vena Cava
Aorta
Flow-196C
Valves were frozen for either one or 12 weeks at -20C, -80C or
Meter
Studies that use frozen tissue may not retain the same extracellular matrix arrangement as
fresh tissue
Results
LV Chamber
Mechanical Testing
Valves were prepared for mechanical testing by cutting circumferential sections of the
anterior leaflet (clear and rough zones) and posterior leaflet
0.3
Vena Cava
Aorta
0.1
Compliance Reservoir
Chamber
* p < 0.01
0.4
Stress (MPa)
^ p < 0.15
Future Objectives
^
Clear
Rough
Posterior
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Grande-Allen and members of the Grande-Allen Lab for the
support and resources needed to conduct this research. Thanks to Dr. Lau at DeBakey High School
for guidance and support. Funding provided by NIH R01HL107765 grant and the NSF GFRP.