Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of Food Physics and Meat Science, Garbenstrasse 21/25 and 3Department of Food Microbiology, Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology,
University of Hohenheim, Garbenstrasse 28, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany; and 2Centre de Cooperation Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le
Developpement (CIRAD), Unite Mixte de Recherche (UMR), Ingenierie des Agropolyme`res et Technologies Emergentes (IATE), Montpellier, 34060 France
MS 12-254: Received 8 June 2012/Accepted 26 January 2013
ABSTRACT
The effect of the addition of a newly synthesized series of rosmarinic acid (RA) esters (REs) and alcohols with chain lengths
of 1, 4, 8, 10, 12, 16, and 18 carbons (RE1 to 18) on the growth behavior of Staphylococcus carnosus LTH1502 and Escherichia
coli K-12 LTH4263 was investigated. An initial microtiter dilution assay indicated activity of compounds against S. carnosus
LTH1502 only, but not E. coli K-12 LTH4263, and a strong dependence of growth inhibition of S. carnosus LTH1502 on the
esters alkyl acid chain lengths. Esters with chains shorter than 8 and longer than 12 had little effect against S. carnosus
LTH1502, whereas esters with chain lengths between 8 and 12 inhibited growth. To better understand the dependence of the
antimicrobial activity of the REs on alkyl chain lengths, RA, n-methyl rosmarinate (RE1), n-dodecyl rosmarinate (RE12), and noctadecyl rosmarinate (RE18) were used in a time-kill assay against S. carnosus LTH1502. Compounds were added at 0.75 mM
in the lag phase, 5 mM in the exponential phase, and 10 mM in the stationary phase. RA had no effect in the lag and exponential
phases but decreased cell counts during the stationary phase. In contrast, RE1 and RE12 decreased cell numbers in all three
phases, with RE12 reducing counts most rapidly. Addition of RE18 did not affect growth regardless of the growth phase.
Appearance and physiological state of S. carnosus LTH1502 cells treated with 200 mM RA after 48 h and with 10 mM RE12
after 4 h were observed by fluorescence microscopy. Images indicated differences in the way the compounds interacted with and
damaged cells. Results were attributed to the different physicochemical properties of RA and its esters.
* Author for correspondence. Tel: z49 711 459 24415; Fax: z49 711 459
24446; E-mail: j.weiss@uni-hohenheim.de.
1540
SURIYARAK ET AL.
1.5 mM. Double-strength MHB (120 ml) was added containing the
bacterial inoculum. Final inoculum levels in the wells were
approximately 5 | 105 CFU/ml. Microtiter plates were incubated
at 37uC with shaking at 180 rpm, and optical density (OD) was
measured after 48 h at 630 nm using a Synergy HT multi-mode
microplate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc., Bad Friedrichshall,
Germany). All measurements were done in triplicate, and samples
were duplicated. The MIC was determined as the concentration at
which the normalized OD (~OD48 h 2 OD0 h) was smaller than
0.05.
Macrobroth endpoint assay. Based on the results of the
microtiter endpoint assay, a concentration below the MIC
determined above was chosen to conduct a macrobroth endpoint
assay with S. carnosus LTH1502 and E. coli K-12 LTH4263. In
that assay, RA and REs were tested at 0.3 mM in PBS containing
5% DMSO to aid in the dissolution of the more lipid-soluble REs
(note that previous studies have shown that DMSO does not inhibit
growth at levels below 10%). The macrobroth assay was
performed by mixing 1 ml of culture in double-strength MHB
(final level: 5 | 105 CFU/ml inoculum) with 1 ml of RA or REs
and incubated at 37uC with shaking at 180 rpm for 48 h. Samples
were withdrawn after 48 h, serially diluted 1:10 in PBS, and plated
on Standard-I nutrient agar for enumeration (Whitley automatic
spiral plater, Don Whitley Scientific Limited, West Yorkshire,
UK). Plates were incubated at 37uC for 24 h, and colonies were
then counted using a colony counter (Synbiosis, Frederick, MD).
All samples were, at a minimum, duplicated.
Microtiter growth-over-time assay. Based on the results of
the above experiments, four compounds (RA, RE1, RE12, and
RE18) were chosen for closer investigation of their activity against
S. carnosus LTH1502, using a microtiter growth-over-time assay.
Wells were loaded with 120 ml of solutions of RA (0 to 1.5 mM),
RE1 (0 to 0.9 mM), RE12 (0 to 0.5 mM), or RE18 (0 to 0.5 mM)
containing DMSO. Twofold-concentrated PBS (120 ml) was added
with the bacterial inoculum. Final inoculation levels were 5 | 105
CFU/ml. Microtiter plates were incubated at 37uC with shaking at
180 rpm, and ODs were measured at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h at 630 nm
using a Synergy HT multi-mode microplate reader (Bio-Tek). All
measurements were done in triplicate, and samples were
duplicated. The MICs were determined.
Macrobroth time-kill assay. To further determine the
functionality of compounds, RA and its esters were added at three
different growth stages to S. carnosus LTH1502 cultures. (i) Lag
1541
FIGURE 2. Cell numbers of S. carnosus LTH1502 (A) and E. coli K-12 LTH4263 (B) and its esters obtained by plate counting after
incubation of bacteria in the presence of 0.3 mM RA for 48 h at 37uC. The inoculation levels of S. carnosus LTH1502 and E. coli K-12
LTH4263 were approximately 5 | 105 CFU/ml. Results with different letters (a to d) are significantly different (P , 0.05).
phase. Overnight cultures were inoculated at 5 | 105 CFU/ml
with RA, RE1, RE12, and RE18 at 0.75 mM (1/2 the MIC of RA).
Cells were enumerated at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 h
to generate a growth curve. (ii) Exponential phase (adapted from
Mascio et al., 2007 (28)). Overnight cultures were diluted to 5 |
106 CFU/ml and incubated at 37uC for 2 h before adding RA and
the respective esters RE1, RE12, and RE18 at 5 mM (10| MIC of
RE12). Cells were enumerated at 0, 0.3, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h. (iii)
Stationary phase. A 20- to 22-h activated culture (,108 CFU/ml)
was collected by centrifugation at 3,000 | g for 15 min at 4uC and
was twice washed with PBS. The bacteria were treated with RA,
RE1, RE12, and RE18 at 10 mM (20| MIC of RE12). Cells were
plated for enumeration at 0, 0.5 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 h.
For enumeration, all samples were serially diluted in PBS and
plated on Standard-I nutrient agar, using a Whitley automatic spiral
plater (Don Whitley Scientific Limited). Plates were incubated at 37uC
for 24 h, and colonies were counted using a colony counter (Synbiosis).
Fluorescence microscopy. Fluorescence microscopy was
used to investigate the appearance and the physiological state of
cells treated with or without RA and its esters. Bacterial cells
imaged were from the stationary phase of the above-described
time-kill assays. Studies have reported that the phenolic group of
RA induces a fluorescence that can be detected if samples are
exciting at 395 nm and emission is recorded at 480 nm. Thus,
direct fluorescence observation of cells without use of a stain was
carried out. Propidium iodide (PI), a fluorescence dye typically
used to monitor changes in cell membrane integrity, was also used
(18); PI is able to give information about a potential cell death. The
excitation and emission ranges of PI are 470 to 490 and 620 to
650 nm, respectively. For staining and imaging, a modified method
from Kim et al. (18) was used: 30 ml of 2 mM PI in DMSO was
mixed with 2 ml of bacterial suspensions treated with RA or RE,
stirred thoroughly, and kept in the dark for 15 min. The samples
were then placed on glass slides and covered with a cover slip.
Treated bacterial cells with or without PI were observed under an
RESULTS
Microtiter and macrobroth endpoint assays with E.
coli K-12 LTH4263 and S. carnosus LTH1502. The
antimicrobial activity of RA against E. coli K-12 LTH4263
1542
SURIYARAK ET AL.
1543
FIGURE 3. Effect of (A) rosmarinic acid (RA), (B) methyl rosmarinate (RE1), (C) dodecyl rosmarinate (RE12), and (D) octadecyl
rosmarinate (RE18) on the growth behavior of S. carnosus LTH1502 over 24 h of incubation. Growth was assessed by measuring the
optical density (OD) of cultures incubated at 37uC in the presence of different concentrations of RA and its esters over the course of 24 h.
Shown is the normalized OD (OD 2 OD0), where OD0 is OD at time zero.
1544
SURIYARAK ET AL.
r
FIGURE 4. Assessment of the effect of addition of rosmarinic
acid and its esters at different stages of growth of S. carnosus
LTH1502. Application concentrations were adjusted to account for
the different sensitivities of cells during the different growth stages:
(A) lag phase, 0.75mM; (B) exponential phase, 5 mM; (C)
stationary phase, 10 mM. Cell numbers were determined by plate
counting at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4.5, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 h.
1545
FIGURE 5. Fluorescence microscopy images of S. carnosus LTH1502 cells incubated with dodecyl rosmarinate (RE12) at 10 mM for 4 h.
Left, fluorescence images observed under 395- to 440-nm filter without PI stain; right, images observed with PI stain.
HLB
Behavior of compound
RA (rosmarinic acid)
RE1 (methyl rosmarinate)
RE12 (dodecyl rosmarinate)
RE18 (octadecyl rosmarinate)
30.5
14.1
7.9
5
Water-soluble compound
Amphiphilic compound with a preference for stabilizing oil-in-water dispersions, forms micelles
Amphiphilic compound, both oil and water soluble, with preference for bilayer structures, forms micelles
Amphiphilic compound, oil-soluble, with a preference for water-in-oil dispersions, forms reverse micelles
Hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) numbers were calculated using the Davis rule (16). Behavior of compounds was visually assessed
by dispersing them in phosphate buffer at pH 7.2. Formation of micelles was assessed by dynamic light scattering studies.
1546
SURIYARAK ET AL.
FIGURE 6. Proposed mechanism of interaction of rosmarinic acid and RE12 with gram-positive bacterial cells.
1547
REFERENCES
1. Al-Sereiti, M. R., K. M. Abu-Amer, and P. Sen. 1999. Pharmacology
of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis Linn.) and its therapeutic
potentials. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 37:124130.
2. Ansel, H. C., W. P. Norred, and I. L. Roth. 1969. Antimicrobial
activity of dimethyl sulfoxide against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, and Bacillus megaterium. J. Pharm. Sci. 58:836839.
3. Bakal, G., and A. Diaz. 2005. The lowdown on lauric arginate: food
antimicrobial hammers away at plasma membrane, disrupting a
pathogens metabolic process. Food Qual. Saf. February/March.
Available at: http://www.foodquality.com/details/article/878217/
The_Lowdown_on_Lauric_Arginate.html. Accessed 5 June 2012.
4. Balaev, A. E., K. N. Dvoretski, and V. A. Doubrovski. 2002.
Refractive index of Escherichia coli cells. Proc. SPIE 4707:253
260.
5. Balgavy, P., D. Uhrkova, J. Gallova, K. Lohner, and G. Degovics.
1993. Interaction of tertiary amine anesthetics with phosphatidylcholine bilayers, p. 184185. In P. Laggner and O. Glatter (ed.), Progress
in colloid and polymer science, vol. 93. Trends in colloid and
interface science VII. Springer, Berlin.
6. Bors, W., M. Christa, K. Stettmaier, L. Yinrong, and F. L. Yeap.
2004. Antioxidant mechanisms of polyphenolic caffeic acid oligomers, constituents of Salvia officinalis. Biol. Res. 37:301311.
7. Chakraborty, D., S. M. Mandal, J. Chakraborty, P. K. Bhattacharyaa,
A. Bandyopadhyay, A. Mitra, and K. Gupta. 2007. Antimicrobial
activity of leaf extract of Basilicum polystachyon (L) Moench. Indian
J. Exp. Biol. 45:744748.
8. Chen, Y.-L., and C.-C. Chou. 2005. Factors affecting the susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus CCRC 12657 to water soluble lactose
chitosan derivative. Food Microbiol. 22:2935.
9. Cheung, S., and J. Tai. 2007. Anti-proliferative and antioxidant
properties of rosemary Rosmarinus officinalis. Oncol. Rep. 17:1525
1531.
10. Chu-Kung, A. F., R. Nguyen, K. N. Bozzelli, and M. Tirrell. 2010.
Chain length dependence of antimicrobial peptide-fatty acid conjugate activity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 345:160167.
11. Cuvelier, M.-E., H. Richard, and C. Berset. 1996. Antioxidative
activity and phenolic composition of pilot-plant and commercial
extracts of sage and rosemary. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 73:645652.
12. Davidson, P. M., J. N. Sofos, and A. L. Branen. 2005. Antimicrobials
in food. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
13. Davies, J. T. 1957. A quantitative kinetic theory of emulsion type. I.
Physical chemistry of the emulsion agent, p. 426438. In Proceedings
of the 2nd International Congress on Surface Activity. Butterworths,
London.
14. Gaysinsky, S., and J. Weiss. 2007. Aromatic and spice plants: uses in
food safety. Stewart Postharvest Solutions 4:916.
15. Gradelski, E., B. Kolek, D. Bonner, and J. Fung-Tomc. 2002.
Bactericidal mechanism of gatifloxacin compared with other
quinolones. Chemotherapy 49:185188.
1548
SURIYARAK ET AL.
16. Guo, X., Z. Rong, and X. Ying. 2006. Calculation of hydrophilelipophile balance for polyethoxylated surfactants by group contribution method. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 298:441450.
17. Karlovska, J., K. Lohner, G. Degovics, I. Lacko, F. Devnsky, and P.
Balgavy. 2004. Effects of non-ionic surfactants N-alkyl-N, Ndimethylamine-N-oxides on the structure of a phospholipid bilayer:
small-angle X-ray diffraction study. Chem. Phys. Lipids 129:3141.
18. Kim, Y.-M., S. Farrah, and R. H. Baney. 2007. Membrane damage of
bacteria by silanols treatment. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 10:252259.
19. Kong, M., X. G. Chen, K. Xing, and H. J. Park. 2010. Antimicrobial
properties of chitosan and mode of action: a state of the art review.
Int. J. Food Microbiol. 144:5163.
20. Kragh-Hansen, U., M. Le Maire, and J. V. Maller. 1998. The
mechanism of detergent solubilization of liposomes and proteincontaining membranes. Biophys. J. 75:29322946.
21. Kubo, I., K. Fujita, K. Nihei, and N. Masuoka. 2003. Non-antibiotic
antibacterial activity of dodecyl gallate. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 11:573
580.
22. Laguerre, M., L. J. Lopez Giraldo, J. Lecomte, M.-C. FigueroaEspinoza, B. Barea, J. Weiss, E. A. Decker, and P. Villeneuve. 2010.
Relationship between hydrophobicity and antioxidant ability of
phenolipids in emulsions: a parabolic effect of the chain length
of rosmarinate esters. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58:28692876.
23. Lecomte, J., L. J. Lopez Giraldo, M. Laguerre, B. Barea, and P.
Villeneuve. 2010. Synthesis, characterization and free radical
scavenging properties of rosmarinic acid fatty esters. J. Am. Oil
Chem. Soc. 87:615620.
24. Lieberman, S., M. G. Enig, and H. G. Preuss. 2006. A review of
monolaurin and lauric acid: natural virucidal and bactericidal agents.
Altern. Complement. Ther. 12:310314.
25. Lohner, K. 1991. Effects of small organic molecules on phospholipid
phase transitions. Chem. Phys. Lipids 57:341362.
26. Lu, Y., and L. Y. Foo. 1999. Rosmarinic acid derivatives from Salvia
officinalis. Phytochemistry 51:9194.
27. Marquis, R. E. 1973. Immersion refractometry of isolated bacterial
cell walls. J. Bacteriol. 116:12731279.
28. Mascio, C. T., J. D. Alder, and J. A. Silverman. 2007. Bactericidal
action of daptomycin against stationary-phase and nondividing
Staphylococcus aureus cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:
42554260.
zcan, M. M., and D. Arslan. 2011. Antioxidant effect of essential
29. O
oils of rosemary, clove and cinnamon on hazelnut and poppy oils.
Food Chem. 129:171174.
zturk, M., M. E. Duru, B. Ince, M. Harmandar, and G. Topcu. 2010.
30. O
A new rapid spectrophotometric method to determine the rosmarinic
acid level in plant extracts. Food Chem. 123:13521356.
31. Petersen, M. S. 1991. Characterization of rosmarinic acid synthase
from cell cultures of Coleus blumei. Phytochemistry 30:28772881.
32. Razzaque, A., and B. E. Ellis. 1977. Rosmarinic acid production in
Coleus cell cultures. Planta 137:287291.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without
permission.