Professional Documents
Culture Documents
July 2014
Flow of Presentation
Keywords
Abbreviation
Introduction
Research Objective
Literature review
Research Methodology
Cost Benefit Analysis of Diesel vs. Solar Water Pump
Conclusion
Bibliography
Appendix
Keywords
Market Potential,
Abbreviation
SWP
MNRE
PVP
PV
Photovoltaic
AC
Alternate Current
DC
Direct Current
JNNSM
RKVY
GDP
GHG
Greenhouse gas
JGS
Jyotirgram Scheme
Year
FY 2012
FY 2013
5000 Cr
8375 Cr
8%
12%
800+
800+
95%
95%
Pump
Inverter
Solar panels
Why Solar?
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
2011
Solar PV
2013
2015
2017
Conventional Power
2019
2021
Market Potential
MP
N
P
Q
MS
= market potential
= total number of potential consumers
= average selling price
= average annual consumption
= market share (%) of consumers buying from firm A
1. http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/market-potential.html
2. http://plantsforhumanhealth.ncsu.edu/extension/marketready/pdfsppt/business_development_files/PDF/estimating_market_potential.pdf
Research Objective
Literature review
Literature review
Literature review
Literature review
Literature review
Research Methodology
Scenario 0
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
250
250
250
250
250
500
1000
2000
63
63
63
63
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
10
10
10
10
26775
53550
107100
214200
Year
Capital Cost
Without
Subsidy (A)
Capital Cost
With 30%
Subsidy (D)
Operating
Cost (B)
Maintenance
Cost (C)
489400
342580
2500
491900
345080
2500
494400
347580
2500
496900
350080
2500
499400
352580
2500
501900
355080
2500
504400
357580
2500
506900
360080
2500
509400
362580
2500
511900
365080
10
2500
514400
367580
Year
Operating
Cost (B)
Maintenan
ce Cost (C)
Total Cost
(A+B+C)
Diesel Pump
Cumulative
Cost
SWP Cost
Without
Subsidy
SWP Cost
With 30%
Subsidy
30000
26775
5000
61775
61775
491900
345080
29453
5000
34453
96228
494400
347580
32398
5000
37398
133625
496900
350080
35638
5000
40638
174263
499400
352580
39201
5000
44201
218464
501900
355080
43121
5000
48121
266585
504400
357580
47434
5000
52434
319019
506900
360080
52177
5000
57177
376196
509400
362580
57395
5000
62395
438590
511900
365080
10
63134
5000
68134
506725
514400
367580
Total
506725
500000
400000
Diesel Pump
300000
200000
100000
0
1
10
Year
Operating
Cost (B)
Maintenan
ce Cost (C)
Total Cost
(A+B+C)
Diesel Pump
Cumulative
Cost
SWP Cost
Without
Subsidy
SWP Cost
With 30%
Subsidy
30000
53550
5000
88550
88550
491900
345080
58905
5000
63905
152455
494400
347580
64795.5
5000
69796
222251
496900
350080
71275.05
5000
76275
298526
499400
352580
78402.56
5000
83403
381928
501900
355080
86242.81
5000
91243
473171
504400
357580
94867.09
5000
99867
573038
506900
360080
104353.8
5000
109354
682392
509400
362580
114789.2
5000
119789
802181
511900
365080
10
126268.1
5000
131268
933449
514400
367580
Total
933449
800000
700000
600000
Diesel Pump
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
0
1
10
Year
Operating
Cost (B)
Maintenan
ce Cost (C)
Total Cost
(A+B+C)
Diesel Pump
Cumulative
Cost
SWP Cost
Without
Subsidy
SWP Cost
With 30%
Subsidy
30000
107100
5000
142100
142100
491900
345080
117810
5000
122810
264910
494400
347580
129591
5000
134591
399501
496900
350080
142550.1
5000
147550
547051
499400
352580
156805.1
5000
161805
708856
501900
355080
172485.6
5000
177486
886342
504400
357580
189734.2
5000
194734
1081076
506900
360080
208707.6
5000
213708
1294784
509400
362580
229578.4
5000
234578
1529362
511900
365080
10
252536.2
5000
257536
1786898
514400
367580
Total
1786898
1600000
1400000
1200000
Diesel Pump
SWP without Subsidy
SWP With 30% Subsidy
1000000
800000
600000
400000
200000
0
10
Year
Operating
Cost (B)
Maintenan
ce Cost (C)
Total Cost
(A+B+C)
Diesel Pump
Cumulative
Cost
SWP Cost
Without
Subsidy
SWP Cost
With 30%
Subsidy
30000
214200
5000
249200
249200
491900
345080
235620
5000
240620
489820
494400
347580
259182
5000
264182
754002
496900
350080
285100.2
5000
290100
1044102
499400
352580
313610.2
5000
318610
1362712
501900
355080
344971.2
5000
349971
1712684
504400
357580
379468.4
5000
384468
2097152
506900
360080
417415.2
5000
422415
2519567
509400
362580
459156.7
5000
464157
2983724
511900
365080
10
505072.4
5000
510072
3493796
514400
367580
Total
3493796
3000000
2500000
Diesel Pump
2000000
1500000
1000000
500000
0
1
10
Conclusion
Particular
250
250
250
250
250
500
1000
2000
Operating/ day
No. of Sunny Days/ Year
No. of Hour Pump
Operating/ Year
Break Even Point
Without Subsidy
Break Even Point
With 30% Subsidy
10 Year
3
4
Year
1
4
3
4
Year
Year
3
4
1
2
Year
Year
2 Year
1
2
Year
Conclusion
Bibliography
Gupta, R. K. (2011). The role of water technology in development: a case study of Gujarat
State. (pp. 1-14). Zaragoza, Spain: UN Water.
Hu, B. (2012). Solar Panel Anomaly Detection and Classification. Waterloo: University of
Waterloo.
Bibliography
IEA. (Octomber, 2011). energy for all: financing access for the poor. energy for all conference
(pp. 19-22). Oslo, Norway: International Energy Agency.
K Palanisami, K. M. (2011). Spread and Economics of Micro-irrigation in India: Evidence from
Nine States. REVIEW OF AGRICULTURE, 1-6.
KPMG. (2011). The Rising Sun - A Point of View on the Solar Energy Sector in India. Mumbai:
KPMG.
lorentz. (2008). Solar Water Pumps in Namibia: A Comparison Between Solar And Diesel.
MNRE. (2013). Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission - SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC WATER
PUMPING SYSTEMS.
Seleshi Bekele Awulachew (IWMI), P. L. (2009). Pumps for small-scale irrigation. IWMI.
SELF. (2008). A COST AND RELIABILITY COMPARISON BETWEEN SOLAR AND DIESEL
POWERED PUMPS. Solar Electric Light Fund (SELF).
Shah. (1993). Groundwater markets and irrigation development: Political economy and practical
policy. Bombay: Oxford University .
Shah, T. (2008). Crop per Drop of Diesel! Energy-Squeeze on Indias Smallholder Irrigation.
Anand, India: International Water Management Institute, .
Shamaila Zia, T. A. (2012). easibility Assessment of photovoltaic pumping for irrigation in West
Bengal, India. 1. Institute of Agricultural Engineering (440e) Universitt Hohenheim, Stuttgart,
Germany 2. Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India.
Bibliography
Shamaila Zia, T. A. (2012). easibility Assessment of photovoltaic pumping for irrigation in West
Bengal, India. 1. Institute of Agricultural Engineering (440e) Universitt Hohenheim, Stuttgart,
Germany 2. Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India.
Shiv Lal, P. K. (2013). Techno-economic analysis of solar photovoltaic based submersible water
pumping system for rural areas of an Indian state Rajasthan . Science Journal of Energy
Engineering, 1-4.
Singhi_Advisors. (2011). Pump & Valve Industry Overview & Opportunities.
Somasekhar. G, B. G. (2014). Marketing Methodology of Solar PV Power Packs. IOSR Journal
of Economics and Finance (IOSR-JEF), 38-43.
SPROSS, J. (2014, February 7). India Wants To Switch 26 Million Water Pumps To Solar Power
Instead Of Diesel. Retrieved April 15, 2014, from http://thinkprogress.org:
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/02/07/3265631/india-solar-pump-swap/
taiyosolar.in. (n.d.). solarpump. Retrieved may 20, 2014, from taiyosolar:
http://taiyosolar.in/solarpump.html
TATA . (2013). Indian Pumps and Industrial Valves Market. TATA Strategic management group.
TERI. (2013). TERI Energy Data Directory & Yearbook (TEDDY) 2012/13. TERI Publication.
The Times of India. (2013, March 4). Power-full Gujarat gives 24-hour electricity. Retrieved
May 10, 2014, from indiatimes.com: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Power-fullGujarat-gives-24-hour-electricity/articleshow/18786012.cms
Tushaar Shah, S. V. (n.d.). Real-time Co-management of Electricity and Groundwater: An
Assessment of Gujarats Pioneering Jyotirgram Scheme. International Water Management
Institute, Anand, India.